Skip to main content
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal logoLink to Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
. 2012 Apr 1;14(4):240–244.

Relationship between Low Birth Weight Neonate and Maternal Serum Zinc Concentration

N Khadem 1, A Mohammadzadeh 2,*, A S Farhat 2, L Valaee 3, M Khajedaluee 4, S M R Parizadeh 5
PMCID: PMC3385804  PMID: 22754688

Abstract

Background

Zinc deficiency can lead to clinically relevant disturbances in tissue functions and particularly important for birth weight of neonates. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between serum zinc in pregnant women and the incidence of low birth weight (<2500 g) in their newborns.

Methods

This case-control study was done on women who delivered low birth weight infants (Cases), and normal birth weight infants (Controls). Blood samples got in all women within 5 minutes of delivery, and assessed the concentration of zinc using electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Serum concentration of zinc was compared.

Results

One hundred and seventeen mothers were enrolled, of them, 65 cases were low birth weight infants (1845±472 g) and 52 were controls (3166± 435 g). Mothers in the case and control groups did not differ in age, body mass index, and socioeconomic or demographic factors. Maternal zinc concentration differed between cases and controls; 753.34±15 µg/l vs. 654.76±12 µg/l respectively. Maternal zinc differed between premature and full term deliveries.

Conclusion

Maternal zinc concentration was shown to affect birth weight and prematurity.

Keywords: Zinc, Low birth weight, Pregnant

Introduction

Low birth weight (LBW) is a crucial and a substantial factor contributing to infant mortality.[1][2] Infants with LBW are at increased risks for long term disability and various physical morbidities.[3] Poor nutrition during pregnancy is recognized as an important cause for LBW particularly in developing countries.[4] Deficiencies in micronutrients such as zinc, iron, folic acid and iodine during pregnancy can cause LBW.[5]

Pregnant women in developing countries were shown to consume diets with a lower density of minerals and vitamins. Suboptimal zinc intake may be relatively common throughout the world.[6] Low zinc intake may be especially detrimental during pregnancy due to the role that zinc plays in growth and development. Potential adverse consequences of zinc deficiency during pregnancy include increased maternal mortality, LBW, prolonged labor, spontaneous abortion and prematurity.[6][7] Impaired zinc status during pregnancy was recently found to adversely influence late fetal development.[8]

Evidences suggests that zinc deficiency is one of the important problems within the developed and developing countries.[9] In 1991, a report emphasized the importance of zinc and also indicated that in countries such as Iran, Egypt, Turkey, China, Yugoslavia, and Canada, due to low consumption of red meat, and high consumption of fiber, zinc deficiency was seen quite often.[9] Zinc deficiency in human was reported for the first time in Iran in 1961[10] and in Egypt in 1963.[11]

Pregnant women are facing zinc deficiency more than the other groups, due to having fetus which need zinc for its poor growth.[12] A separate study in 2001 indicated that using supplementary zinc materials by pregnant mother, increased newborn birth weight, and decreased the mortality rate.[12] The aim of this prospective case-controlled study was to determine the relationship between maternal zinc concentrations and neonatal birth weight in a group of mothers having LBW deliveries as compared to a group who delivered normal birth weight infants. If zinc was found to be involved in the pathogenesis of LBW, then supplementation of zinc during pregnancy could possibly be considered to ameliorate this serious morbidity.

Materials and Methods

We conducted this prospective case-control study at the maternity ward of Imam Reza Hospital and the Neonatal Research Center of Mashhad University for Medical Sciences in Iran. The study protocol was approved by the research office at the university, and written informed consent was obtained from each subject before enrollment. The study was done between May 2006 and February 2007. Mother-infants pairs were included if (i) maternal age was 17-35 years at the time of delivery, and (ii) She had uncomplicated singleton pregnancy.

“Cases” were considered if the birth weight of the newborn was <2500 g without any known underlying risk factors that could explain the reason for the LBW. A “Control” subject was enrolled when a subsequent mother delivered an infant with birth weight =2500 g.

Mothers were not considered for the study if any of the following exclusion criteria were present: A previous history of LBW delivery, twin and multiple pregnancies, preeclampsia and eclampsia, uterine cervical abnormalities, antenatal bleeding, oligo- and polyhydramnios, abnormal maternal conditions prior pregnancies; such as lupus, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, seizure disorders, malignancies, and drug or alcohol abuse.

The investigator did a thorough physical examination of every infant recruited into the study. The infant's weight was taken to the nearest 10 g and the length was recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm. The gestational age was assessed clinically using the Dubowitz method.[13] Medical and social data on mothers were obtained from available information in their records and by direct interviews.

For zinc assays in the first, 5 minutes after delivery, immediately after collection of blood, it was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min. Plasma was separated and kept frozen at -20°C. The samples were analyzed after all of them collected. Serum zinc concentration was determined by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) in a Perkin-Elmer 1100B apparatus (Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer). All samples were analyzed in duplicate. Our laboratory reference range for serum zinc was ≥500 µg/L, which is similar to that of other laboratories.[14][15][16]

All specimens were de-identified before processing, therefore, laboratory staff was masked to clinical conditions. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software (Version 11.5, Chicago, IL, USA). For quantitative data with normal distribution t-test and with abnormal distribution, Kruskal-Wallis test were used. For qualitative data, X2 test was used.

Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to control potential confounding variables. Statistical significance was considered when p was less than 0.05.

Results

The study included 117 mother-infant pairs, of them, 65 were cases and 52 were controls. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are listed in Table 1. Maternal zinc concentration (µg/l) differed between cases and controls; 753.34±15 µg/l vs. 654.76±12 µg/l respectively. It was related to either gestational age or birth weight (Table 2).

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristic of the study population (n=117).

Variable Case (n=65) Control (n=52) Pvalue
A. Maternal
Age (year) 24±4 25.7±5.4 0.059
BMI (mean±SD) 23.4±3.4 22.9±3.2 0.448
Education (%)
Illiterate 4 11 0.336
Primary 47 53
Intermediate 43 32
University 6 4
Income (%)
Monthly income <150$ 21 34 0.029
Monthly income<150-500$ 69 66
Monthly income >500$ 10 0
B. Infant
Gender
Female (%) 43 53 0.281
Male (%) 57 47
Birth Weight (g) 1845±472 3167±435 <0.001
Apgar (mean±SD)
1 minute 7.56±1.33 8.38±0.63 <0.001
5 minute 8.19±1.31 8.94±0.41 <0.001
Gestational Age (wk) 33.4±2.9 39.3±1.4 <0.001

Table 2. Maternal serum zinc concentration according to gestational age and birth weight in case and control groups.

Characteristics Number Zinc concentration (μg/l) P value
Gestational Age (Mean±SD)
<32 week 21 783.28±14
32-37 week 44 769.25±15 <0.001
>37 week 52 654.76±12
Birth weight (Mean±SD)
<2000 gram 36 790.25±14
2000-2500 gram 29 753.34±15 <0.001
>2500 gram 52 654.76±12

On regression analysis, zinc concentrations did not differ between cases and controls (p>0.05) after we controlled for various confounders such as maternal age, body mass index (BMI), educational level, income, neonatal gender, birth weight, gestational age, and Apgar scores.

Discussion

This study demonstrated zinc concentrations in the serum of mothers who delivered LBW infants differ from mothers who delivered infants with a normal birth weight, and serum zinc level in case group was significantly higher than mothers with normal birth weight and mature infants (p<0.01).

Our results showed that zinc level decreased with increasing gestational period. The maximum decrease in zinc level was observed during weeks of 35-36 of gestational age. These results are similar to other studies.[17][18][19][20] Serum zinc was within normal range in all enrolled women. This could be related to the recent mandate by the Ministry of Health of Iran to provide multivitamins and minerals supplementations to all expectant women.

A study carried out by Diet Health and Knowledge Survey of Iran Ministry of Health in 2001 about micronutrient consumption among the pregnant women in eleven regions of Iran was representative of all geographical areas. Analysis showed that prevalence of maternal zinc deficiency in Mashhad was 43.3% and among others areas of Iran, it was a third grade maternal zinc deficiency. Although significant correlation was found between the age of pregnancy and maternal zinc concentration, so during the third trimester, 44% of pregnant women were zinc deficient.[21]

A total of 12 randomized, controlled intervention trials of supplemental zinc and pregnancy outcome have been reported.[22] Of the 12 trials, 6 found no effect of the zinc intervention on pregnancy outcome. Two studies reported that supplemental zinc significantly improved fetal growth.[23][24] Both studies were done in populations in whom maternal zinc depletion was likely. In the study conducted in India, the birth weight of neonates from women in the placebo group averaged only 2.6 Kg. Neonates of zinc-supplemented mothers were 0.3–0.8 Kg more, depending on the length of time supplemental zinc was provided.[23] If the zinc supplement was initiated in the first trimester, the effect on birth weight was greater if it was initiated in the third trimester.

Although plasma zinc concentration is commonly used as an indicator of zinc status, interpretation of the measurement is difficult because plasma zinc concentration decreased with infection, vigorous exercise, and food intake. Assessment is more difficult during pregnancy because plasma zinc concentration declines in proportion to the increase in plasma volume.[25]

It can be concluded that, when mothers receive zinc supplementation during pregnancy, zinc concentration in the blood plays a role in determining the birth weight of term and preterm infants. Our study determined if such conclusion can apply to zinc depleted mothers.

It is accomplished that an early and progressive decline in serum zinc occurs during gestation and a poor maternal zinc status may limit the metabolic adaptation capacity of women especially during pregnancy. Some previous studies demonstrated that zinc deficiency during pregnancy in early weeks can produce abortion and congenital malformation.[26][27] If this deficiency continues during pregnancy, the growth of the fetus may cause complications at birth.[20] Birth weight depends on many factors such as gender of the neonate, maternal age, race, BMI, maternal weight gain during gestation, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Multiple regression analyses should be performed to control for all of these variables before blaming zinc deficiency for the presence of LBW. Maternal zinc concentration was shown to affect birth weight and prematurity.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the research vice-chancellor of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences-Iran for his support in funding this study. Also we are thankful from Miss Mojde Mahmoodi for data collection.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

  • 1.de Onis M, Blössner M, Villar J. Levels and patterns of intrauterine growth retardation in developing countries. Eur J Clin Nutr . 1998;52:S5–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO, Low birth weight. A tabulation of available information. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Osrin D, de L Costello AM. Maternal nutrition and fetal growth: practical issues in international health. Semin Neonatal . 2000;5:209–19. doi: 10.1053/siny.2000.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Klein CJ. Nutrient Requirements For Preterm Infant Formulas 1,2,3. The Journal of Nutrition. 2002;132:S1395S–1577S. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.6.1395S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Child Health Research Project. Special report. Reducing perinatal and neonatal mortality. Baltimore, Maryland: 1999. pp. 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tamura T, Goldenberg RL. Zinc nutriture and pregnancy outcome. Nutrition Research. 1996;16:139–81. doi: 10.1016/0271-5317(95)02068-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Caulfield LE, Zavaleta N, Shankar AH, Merialdi M. Potential contribution of maternal zinc supplementation during pregnancy to maternal and child survival. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68:499S–508S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/68.2.499S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Merialdi M, Caulfield LE, Zavaleta N, Figueroa A, DiPietro JA. Adding zinc to prenatal iron and folate tablets improves fetal neurobehavioral development. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:483–90. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70236-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sandstead HH. Zinc deficiency, A public health problem? Am J Dis Child. 1991;145:853–9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1991.02160080029016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Prasad AS, Halsted JA, Nadimi M. Syndrome of Iron deficiency, anemia, hepatic, hypogonadism, dwarfism and geophagia. Am J Med. 1961;31:532–46. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(61)90137-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Prasad AS, Miale A Jr, Farid Z, Sandstead HH, Schulert AR. Zinc metabolism in patients with the syndrome of iron deficiency anemia, hepatosplenomegaly, dwarfism, and hypognadism. J Lab Clin Med. 1963;61:537–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shah D, Sachdev HP. Effect of gestational zinc deficiency on pregnancy outcomes: summary of observation studies and zinc supplementation trials. Br J Nutr. 2001;85:S101–8. doi: 10.1079/BJN2000301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Capurro H, Konichezky S, Fonseca D, Caldeyro-Barcia R. A simplified method for diagnosis of gestational age in the newborn infant. J Pediatr. 1978;93:120–2. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(78)80621-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hambidge KM, Mauer AM. Trace elements. In: National Research Council, Food and Nutrition Board. Laboratory indices of nutritional status in pregnancy. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 1978. pp. 157–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.King JC, Stein T, Doyle M. Effect of vegetarianism on the zinc status of pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34:1049–55. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/34.6.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Butte NF, Calloway DH, Van Duzen JL. Nutritional assessment of pregnant and lactating navajo women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34:2216–28. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/34.10.2216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.AL-Bader A, Hussain T, Al-Mosawi M, Otaibi M, Abul H, Khalifa D, Dashti H. Serum zinc and copper concentrations in pregnant women from Kuwait. J Trace Elem Exp Med . 1997;10:209–15. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-670X(1997)10:4&#x0003c;209::AID-JTRA1&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Adeniyi FA. The implications if hypozincemia in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . 1987;66:579–82. doi: 10.3109/00016348709022059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Makinde OO, Amole F, Ogunniyi SO. Serum copper,zinc and magnesium in maternal and cord blood at delivery. West Afr J Med. 1991;10:168–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Izquierdo Alvarez S, Castañón SG, Ruata ML, Aragüés EF, Terraz PB, Irazabal YG, González EG, Rodríguez BG. Updating of normal levels of copper,zinc and selenium in serum of pregnant women. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2007;21:49–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2007.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Investigation on status of micro nutrition in Iran on 2001, Diet Health and Knowledge Ward of Iran Ministry of Health, 1st ed. 2006. p. 148. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.King JC. Determinants of maternal zinc status during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:1334S–43S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.5.1334s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Garg HK, Singhal KC, Arshad Z. A study of the effect of oral zinc supplementation during pregnancy on pregnancy outcome. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1993;37:276–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Goldenberg RL, Tamura T, Neggers Y, Copper RL, Johnston KE, DuBard MB, Hauth JC. The effect of zinc supplementation on pregnancy outcome. JAMA. 1995;274:463–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530060037030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Swanson CA, King JC. Reduced serum zinc concentration during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;62:313–8. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198309000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lorenzo Alonso MJ, Bermejo Barrera A, Cocho de Juan JA, Fraga Bermúdez JM, Bermejo Barrera P. Selenium levels in related biological samples: human placenta, maternal and umbilical cord blood ,hair and nails. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2005;19:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2005.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Swanson CA, King JC. Zinc and pregnancy outcome. Am J Clin Nutr. 1987;46:763–71. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/46.5.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Brieflands

RESOURCES