Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2011 Dec 2;19(5):1605–1611. doi: 10.1007/s11356-011-0672-4

Effects of alfalfa and organic fertilizer on benzo[a]pyrene dissipation in an aged contaminated soil

Dengqiang Fu 1,2, Ying Teng 1, Yongming Luo 1,2,✉, Chen Tu 1, Shixing Li 1,2, Zhengao Li 1, Peter Christie 3
PMCID: PMC3386484  PMID: 22134861

Abstract

Background

A climate-controlled pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of planting alfalfa and applying organic fertilizer on the dissipation of benzo[a]pyrene from an aged contaminated agricultural soil.

Results

Short-term planting of alfalfa inhibited the dissipation of benzo[a]pyrene from the soil by 8.9%, and organic fertilizer enhanced benzo[a]pyrene removal from the soil by 11.6% compared with the unplanted and unfertilized treatments, respectively. No significant interaction was observed between alfalfa and organic fertilizer on benzo[a]pyrene dissipation. Sterilization completely inhibited the removal of benzo[a]pyrene from the soil indicating that its degradation by indigenous microorganisms may have been the main mechanism of dissipation. Furthermore, significant positive relationships were observed between benzo[a]pyrene removal and the contents of soil ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, and total mineral nitrogen at the end of the experiment, suggesting that competition between plants and microorganisms for nitrogen may have inhibited benzo[a]pyrene dissipation in the rhizosphere of alfalfa and the addition of organic fertilizer may facilitate microbial degradation of benzo[a]pyrene in the soil.

Keywords: Alfalfa, Organic fertilizer, Benzo[a]pyrene, Aged contaminated soil

Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are of particular concern due to their hydrophobic, recalcitrant, persistent, potentially carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic properties and their ubiquitous occurrence in the environment (Flowers et al. 2002; Samanta et al. 2002; Johnsen and Karlson 2007; Patrolecco et al. 2010; Wolz et al. 2011). Most of the PAHs in the environment are present in surface soils (Wild and Jones 1995; Wilcke 2007). Bioremediation is regarded as a promising strategy for restoring contaminated agricultural soils (Peng et al. 2008; Silva et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2010). Numerous studies have shown that many plant species may promote PAH degradation in soils because plant root exudates, rich in organic acids and mineral nitrogen, may increase the indigenous soil microbial population including PAH-degrading microorganisms (Wetzel et al. 1997; Binet et al. 2000; Liste and Alexander 2000; Muratova et al. 2003; Cofield et al. 2007; Wei and Pan 2010; Teng et al. 2011). Other studies have also shown that some plants may inhibit the removal of PAHs from contaminated soil (Cofield et al. 2007; Smith et al. 2008). Competition for nutrients between plants and soil microorganisms may impede PAH removal in the rhizosphere. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), the most widely grown perennial legume in the world, is a deep-rooted perennial species that may have strong potential for the remediation of a number of organic contaminants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls and PAHs (Chekol et al. 2004; Fan et al. 2008; Teng et al. 2011). Muratova et al. (2003) suggested that alfalfa root exudates are high in organic acids and mineral nitrogen and can promote the growth of soil microorganisms, including PAH degraders. Furthermore, Cheng et al. (2008) found that organic fertilizer application can enhance the biodegradation of PAHs in rhizoshpere soil. However, most of these studies have been conducted with experimentally (artificially) contaminated soils and have concentrated on low molecular weight PAHs such as phenanthrene and pyrene. However, little is known about the effects of alfalfa and organic fertilizer on high molecular weight PAHs such as benzo[a]pyrene dissipation in an aged contaminated soil. And the influence of nutrient in organic fertilizer, especially mineral N, on the dissipation of benzo[a]pyrene is greatly concerned about.

Our recent study found that total concentrations of 16 US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) priority PAHs in some surface soils in the Yangtze River Delta region of east China were over 10.0 mg kg−1 dry soil and the benzo[a]pyrene content reached 1.0 mg kg−1. According to the Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines released by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME 2004), this soil would not be suitable for agricultural use because of its high concentration of PAHs. Remedial measures would be required to restore normal soil function.

The aim of the present study was to determine whether planting alfalfa and applying organic fertilizer would have significant effects on the dissipation of benzo[a]pyrene from a long-term contaminated agricultural soil. In addition, soil mineral nitrogen and pH were determined to investigate the relationships between soil properties and benzo[a]pyrene dissipation. It was hoped that the results would be useful in understanding the potential for remediating a real agricultural soil contaminated with benzo[a]pyrene.

Materials and methods

Soil

The soil studied was collected from the top 15 cm of a PAH-contaminated agricultural field in the Yangtze River Delta region of east China. The contaminated site was adjacent to a gas station which has resulted in PAH pollution over a 30-year period, and PAHs were the main contaminants in the soil according to our previous study (Teng et al. 2011). The soil type is classified as a Hortic Anthrosol according to the World Reference Base soil classification system. Stones and plant root residues in the sampled soil were discarded. The soil was then air-dried, sieved through a 2-mm mesh, and stored at 4°C in the dark prior to use. Physicochemical analysis according to the methods of Lu (1999) shows that the soil is a silt loam with an average organic matter content of 23.4 g kg−1, 1.44 g kg−1 total nitrogen, 0.86 g kg−1 total phosphorus, 12.3 g kg−1 total potassium, 5.02 mg kg−1 ammonium nitrogen, and 3.16 mg kg−1 nitrate nitrogen, soil pH 4.5 (1:2.5 soil/water) determined using a pH meter. Total concentrations of 16 USEPA priority PAHs in the soil were 12.4 mg kg−1 dry soil, with three-ring, four-ring, and five-ring PAH congeners accounting for about 6.0%, 50.7%, and 43.3% of the total PAH contents, and the concentration of benzo[a]pyrene was 1,176 ± 9 μg kg−1 dry soil. Considering the strong carcinogenic risk and food safety of agricultural soil, benzo[a]pyrene was selected as the main target contaminant of PAHs in the soil in this study.

Organic fertilizer

Organic fertilizer was purchased from an agricultural market in Nanjing, China. The physicochemical properties of the organic fertilizer were pH 3.5 (1:2.5 organic fertilizer/water), moisture content 2.7%, organic matter 221 g kg−1, total nitrogen 150 g kg−1, total phosphorus 3.83 g kg−1, and total potassium 19.2 g kg−1. Benzo[a]pyrene was below detection level (<0.1 μg kg−1).

Plants

Alfalfa (M. sativa L.) seeds were purchased from Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Science, China. Before sowing, the seeds were surface sterilized in a 10% (v/v) solution of hydrogen peroxide for 10 min, rinsed with sterile distilled water, and germinated on moist filter paper for 24 h.

Experimental design and sample collection

The pot experiment was carried out in a climate-controlled plant growth chamber. There were five treatments set up in a fully randomized layout: (1) sterilized soil as control (CK), (2) unplanted and unfertilized soil (U), (3) soil planted with alfalfa (P), (4) soil amended with 0.1% organic fertilizer (F), and (5) soil planted with alfalfa and amended with 0.1% organic fertilizer (PF). There were three replicates of each treatment.

Contaminated soil (250 g) was placed in each pot. Soil for the sterilized treatment was autoclaved at 121°C and 0.1 MPa for 20 min. Sterilized water was added to adjust the soil moisture content to 60% water holding capacity. As for the treatments of F and PF, organic fertilizer as base fertilizer was applied into the soil and thoroughly mixed. After equilibration for 24 h in the climate-control chamber, ten germinated alfalfa seeds were sown 1 cm below the surface soil in each pot for treatments P and PF. Two weeks later, the weaker seedlings were removed to leave four seedlings in each pot. The plants were illuminated for a 14-h photoperiod (1.5 × 104 Lx), and the temperature was maintained at 25°C. The leachate from all pots was collected using the tray and returned to the soil. The plants were watered daily with sterilized water to maintain soil moisture during plant growth. Throughout the experiment, the pots were periodically repositioned to minimize edge effects.

The effects of soil sterilization on PAH dissipation were evaluated by collecting a soil sample of about 5.0 g after sterilization. After 60 days of cultivation, plant samples were carefully removed, washed with tap water to remove any attached soil particles, and oven-dried at 50°C to constant weight. Oven-dried plants were divided into shoots and roots, and ground for benzo[a]pyrene analysis. Soil in each pot was poured out on the stainless steel tray and thoroughly homogenized, and then sampled. Soil samples were freeze-dried, passed through a 0.3-mm sieve, and stored at 4°C prior to benzo[a]pyrene analysis.

Extraction and analysis of benzo[a]pyrene in soil and plants

Benzo[a]pyrene in soil samples was extracted using Soxhlet extraction (Ni et al. 2008). In brief, 2.00 g of freeze-dried sample (equivalent to 1.94 g dry soil) and 2.00 g anhydrous sodium sulfate were mixed, wrapped with filter paper, and placed in a Soxhlet extractor. The extractor was then fitted to a 100-ml round bottom flask containing 60 ml dichloromethane, and the extraction was performed at 53°C for 24 h in a water bath. All the extracts in the round bottom flasks were dried by rotary evaporation. The residues were dissolved in 2.0 ml of cyclohexane, and 0.5 ml of the solute was transferred and purified with a silica gel column (8 × 220-mm glass column filled with 1.0 g silica) and washed with a mixture of hexane and dichloromethane (1:1, v/v). The first 1.0 ml of eluate was discarded. The second 2.0 ml aliquot of eluate was collected, dried by sparging with N2, and then redissolved in 1.0 ml acetonitrile for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis.

Plant samples were extracted by an ultrasonication method (Song et al. 1995). Briefly, 1.00 g plant sample and 1.00 g anhydrous sodium sulfate were mixed and extracted with 20 ml methanol at 30°C in an ultrasonicator (600 W) for 15 min. The solvent was then decanted, collected, and replenished three times. The solvent fractions were combined, passed through a glass fiber filter, and dried by a rotary evaporator. The subsequent steps were the same as for the soil sample analysis as described above.

Analysis of benzo[a]pyrene was carried out according to the method of Qian et al. (2007). The analysis was conducted on a Shimadzu Class-VP HPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a fluorescence detector (RF-10AXL). The reversed phase column (Varian Chrom Spher 5, Palo Alto, CA) was specialized for benzo[a]pyrene analysis. The detection limit for the benzo[a]pyrene was less than 0.1 μg kg−1.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using the Origin 8.0 for Windows software package. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance. Mean values were compared by least significant difference at the 0.05 level.

Results

Soil benzo[a]pyrene dissipation

After 60 days of cultivation, the residual concentrations of benzo[a]pyrene in the soil ranged from 245 to 1,072 μg kg−1 in the different treatments. The percent removal rates of soil benzo[a]pyrene in the different treatments are shown in Fig. 1. Only 8.8% of benzo[a]pyrene was dissipated in the abiotic sterile control treatment, while 66.7% was dissipated in unplanted soil. Planting alfalfa inhibited the dissipation of benzo[a]pyrene from soil by 8.9%, while organic fertilizer increased benzo[a]pyrene removal by 11.6% when compared with the unplanted treatment. The percent removal rate of benzo[a]pyrene in organic fertilizer-amended planted soil was significantly lower than in the fertilized treatment but significantly higher than in the planted treatment. Analysis of variance showed no significant interaction between the effects of planting alfalfa and applying organic fertilizer on benzo[a]pyrene removal.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Benzo[a]pyrene removal rate in different treatments after 60 days of alfalfa cultivation. CK sterilized soil, U unplanted and unfertilized soil, P soil planted with alfalfa, F fertilized soil, PF soil planted with alfalfa and fertilized

Plant biomass and benzo[a]pyrene accumulation in alfalfa roots and shoots

There were two planted treatments set up in this experiment as described above. Plant biomass and benzo[a]pyrene accumulated in alfalfa roots and shoots are presented in Table 1. Organic fertilizer significantly increased the shoot and total biomass of alfalfa but decreased the root biomass slightly. Higher concentrations of benzo[a]pyrene in alfalfa roots and shoots were observed in P than in PF. Organic fertilizer significantly decreased the benzo[a]pyrene concentrations in alfalfa roots and shoots. The amounts of benzo[a]pyrene that accumulated in alfalfa biomass were not significantly different between P and PF treatments. Compared with the amount of benzo[a]pyrene lost from the soil, benzo[a]pyrene extracted by plants could be ignored in both P and PF treatments.

Table 1.

Plant biomass and total benzo[a]pyrene uptake by alfalfa roots and shoots

Plant biomass (g pot−1) Benzo[a]pyrene accumulated in plant (ng pot−1) Contribution of plant uptake to the soil benzo[a]pyrene removal (%)
Root Shoot Root Shoot
P 0.49a 0.57b 1.06a 1.23b 0.0016
PF 0.40a 1.01a 0.64b 1.59a 0.0013
Open in a new tab

P planted with alfalfa, PF planted with alfalfa and amended with organic fertilizer. Within columns, mean values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05)

Soil mineral nitrogen concentrations and soil pH

The concentrations of soil mineral nitrogen (ammonium N and nitrate N) at the end of the experiment are presented in Table 2. After 60 days of experiment, soil ammonium N concentrations across all treatments ranged from 1.93 to 8.43 mg kg−1 dry soil, and soil nitrate N concentrations ranged from 1.28 to 5.37 mg kg−1 dry soil. Compared with the initial concentrations of soil mineral N, no significant changes were observed in CK, while soil ammonium N decreased by 23.5% and nitrate N increased by 6.0% in the unplanted treatment. Planting alfalfa reduced the concentrations of ammonium N and nitrate N. Organic fertilizer increased the soil mineral N concentration significantly.

Table 2.

Soil ammonium N and nitrite N concentrations and soil pH under the different treatments

Treatment Soil ammonium N (mg kg−1 dry soil) Soil nitrate N (mg kg−1 dry soil) Soil pH
CK 5.25 ± 0.11b 3.79 ± 0.60b 4.77 ± 0.02a
U 3.84 ± 0.18c 3.35 ± 0.27b 4.61 ± 0.02b
P 1.93 ± 0.02d 1.28 ± 0.10c 4.76 ± 0.01a
F 8.43 ± 0.50a 5.37 ± 0.20a 4.24 ± 0.03d
PF 5.73 ± 0.50b 3.56 ± 0.27b 4.32 ± 0.01c
Open in a new tab

CK sterilized soil, U unplanted soil, P soil planted with alfalfa, F soil with organic fertilizer, PF soil planted with alfalfa and amended with organic fertilizer. Within columns, mean values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05)

Soil pH under the different treatments is shown in Table 2. Soil pH was influenced by planting alfalfa and applying organic fertilizer. Compared with the initial soil pH, planting alfalfa increased the soil pH by 0.3 units and organic fertilizer amendment decreased the soil pH by 0.3. Analysis of variance indicates that there were significant differences between the soil pH values under the different treatments.

Correlation between benzo[a]pyrene removal and soil physicochemical properties

Correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between benzo[a]pyrene removal and soil properties. The results are given in Table 3. In general, significant positive correlations (p < 0.01) were observed between the benzo[a]pyrene removal and organic fertilizer, soil ammonium N, nitrate N, and total mineral N. Soil pH was significantly and negatively correlated with the removal of benzo[a]pyrene (p < 0.01). However, no significant correlation (p > 0.01) was observed between planting of alfalfa and benzo[a]pyrene removal.

Table 3.

Correlation between benzo[a]pyrene removal rate and soil physicochemical properties

Removal rate of soil benzo[a]pyrene
Correlation coefficient P value
Planting alfalfa −0.607 3.61 × 10−2
Organic fertilization 0.766 3.69 × 10−3 a
Soil ammonium N 0.955 1.38 × 10−6 a
Soil nitrate N 0.964 4.55 × 10−7 a
Total mineral N 0.969 2.24 × 10−7 a
Soil pH −0.896 8.00 × 10−5 a
Open in a new tab

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). For planting alfalfa and organic fertilization parameters, planted and fertilized soil were defined as 1 and unplanted and non-fertilized soil were defined as −1

Discussion

In this study, the alfalfa cultivation had negative effects on benzo[a]pyrene removal, but up to 78% of soil benzo[a]pyrene was dissipated in the soil amended with 0.1% organic fertilizer (F), a much larger amount than reported from similar studies (Li et al. 2008; Wu et al. 2008). Moreover, we also found that sterilization completely inhibited benzo[a]pyrene removal. The 8.8% of benzo[a]pyrene dissipation in the abiotic sterile control treatment is due to non-biodegradation. As a semi-volatile compound, benzo[a]pyrene could evaporate partly from soil during the high-temperature sterilization process and be dissipated by photodegradation in the surface soil (Wild and Jones 1993). The removal was caused by biodegradation and enhanced by fertilizer application. This suggests that benzo[a]pyrene-degrading microorganisms may exist in the contaminated soil, and microbial degradation of benzo[a]pyrene by indigenous microorganisms was the main mechanism of benzo[a]pyrene removal from the soil. Biodegradation of benzo[a]pyrene in long-term contaminated soil by indigenous microorganisms has usually been considered to be a very long-term process (Bossert et al. 1984, 1986; Coover et al. 1987; Keck et al. 1989). The half-life of benzo[a]pyrene in soil ranges from 100 days to 14.6 years (Wild et al. 1991; Wilcock et al. 1996). It was therefore surprising that about 78% of soil benzo[a]pyrene was dissipated during the 60 days of cultivation in the present study, and the organisms degrading benzo[a]pyrene in this soil deserve further study. Furthermore, the soil properties and environmental conditions in our study appeared to be suitable for biodegradation of benzo[a]pyrene. A relatively low soil pH, a constant temperature, and a favorable moisture content may be conducive to biodegradation of benzo[a]pyrene.

Alfalfa was considered to be a promising candidate for phytoremediation of PAH-contaminated soil (Muratova et al. 2003; Teng et al. 2011). However, the results of our study indicate that planting alfalfa inhibited benzo[a]pyrene removal from the long-term contaminated soil. According to the correlation analysis, the residual mineral N concentration was positively related to the benzo[a]pyrene removal rate from soil. Alfalfa growth removes much mineral N from the soil and resulted in a significant decrease of the total mineral N by 60.7% of the initial soil concentration, suggesting that competition between plants and microorganisms for nitrogen may have impeded benzo[a]pyrene removal from the rhizosphere of alfalfa. Smith et al. (2008) reported that total N removal by plants was negatively correlated with percent loss of phenanthrene (r 2, 0.73), chrysene (r 2, 0.80), fluoranthene (r 2, 0.56), and pyrene (r 2, 0.55) in a 3-year field study. Hutchinson et al. (2001) found that when fertilizer was applied by weekly irrigation instead of daily irrigation, the vegetation did not significantly impact PAH dissipation, leading to the conclusion that roots and microbial populations quickly depleted the available N from the irrigation water and used it for cellular functions of growth rather than breakdown of PAH contaminants in the soil. There was a significant negative relationship between total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH, C11 to C40) degradation and initial concentration of ammonium N in aged composts. Lack of N fertilizer impacted TPH in composts, and application of ammonium-based fertilizer was a useful measure to enhance phytoremediation when ammonium availability was low (Choi and Chang 2009). Nitrogen is also the major nutrient in bioremediation projects in order to adjust the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of the soil. Nitrogen is primarily used for cellular growth (NH+4 or NO−3) and as an alternative electron acceptor (NO−3). The PAHs dissipation effect at a C/N ratio of 10:1 was significantly higher than at a C/N of either 25:1 or 40:1 (Teng et al. 2010). Joner et al. (2002) also found that N, P, and root exudates were necessary for phytoremediation and suggested intensive fertilization with slow release fertilizers to ensure the replenished mineral nutrients for both plant and microbial populations. One of the main mechanisms for phytoremediation of organic contaminants with alfalfa is rhizodegradation, which is an important chemical–biological process by alfalfa root exudates stimulating indigenous microbial communities to utilize organic contaminants in the rhizosphere soil. During the rhizodegradation, plant growth and microbial activities all need nutrient, especially nitrogen source may be a limited factor. A negative impact of mycorrhizal plants on PAH dissipation (Joner et al. 2006) was speculated to be the result of mycorrhiza scavenging N and depleting the soil of critical nutrients for microbial degradation of the contaminants. Plants and microbes can compete for nutrients in the soils and sediments and may have negatively affected the microbial activity (Kaye and Hart 1997; Hodge et al. 2000; Joner et al. 2002), resulting in less efficient phytoremediation of PAHs. Taken together, our results lead us to conclude that in order for phytoremediation to be effective, the plants must be optimally fertilized to support plant growth while also maximizing the activity of the populations of PAH-degrading microorganisms.

Soil pH is an important factor which affects benzo[a]pyrene removal from contaminated soils. Lower soil pH is beneficial for benzo[a]pyrene degradation. The soil pH was influenced by planting alfalfa and applying organic fertilizer. Several previous studies suggested that planting alfalfa increased soil pH slightly (Moreira and Fageria 2010). However, other studies have indicated that planting alfalfa can decrease soil pH (Chen et al. 2001; Yang et al. 2009; Zhang and Hu 2004). How planting alfalfa affects soil pH may be related with soil types. The influence of organic fertilizer on soil pH will depend on the properties of both soil and fertilizer. The pH of organic fertilizer used in this study was 3.5, which was significantly lower than the initial soil pH. Thus, the soil pH was acidified by application of the fertilizer.

Conclusions

Under our experimental conditions, short-term planting of alfalfa inhibited benzo[a]pyrene dissipation from the aged contaminated agricultural soil and organic fertilizer application led to a significant increase in benzo[a]pyrene removal from the soil. Furthermore, soil mineral N concentrations and soil pH were significantly correlated with benzo[a]pyrene removal. A better understanding of the mechanism of benzo[a]pyrene dissipation will depend on the identification and characterization of native microbial degraders of the PAH in the soil.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Project BK2009016), the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Project KSCX2-YW-G-071), and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) Project 2007AA061101).

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Binet P, Portal JM, Leyval C. Dissipation of 3–6-ring polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the rhizosphere of ryegrass. Soil Biol Biochem. 2000;32:2011–2017. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00100-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bossert ID, Kachel MW, Bartha R (1984) Fate of hydrocarbons during oily sludge disposal in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:763–767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Bossert ID, Bartha R (1986) Structure-biodegradability relationships of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. B Environ Contam Tox 37:490–495 [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. CCME . Canadian soil quality guidelines for the protection of environmental and human health: summary tables. Updated. Winnipeg: CCME; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chekol T, Vough LR, Chaney RL. Phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated soils: the rhizosphere effect. Environ Int. 2004;30:799–804. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2004.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen W, McCaughey WP, Grant CA, Bailey LD. Pasture type and fertilization effects on soil chemical properties and nutrient redistribution. Can J Soil Sci. 2001;81:395–404. doi: 10.4141/S99-103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheng KY, Lai KM, Wong JWC. Effects of pig manure compost and nonionic-surfactant Tween 80 on phenanthrene and pyrene removal from soil vegetated with Agropyron elongatum. Chemosphere. 2008;73:791–797. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi WJ, Chang SX. Technical note: nitrogen fertilization effects on the degradation of aged diesel oil in composted drilling wastes. Int J Phytoremediation. 2009;11:441–450. doi: 10.1080/15226510802655971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cofield N, Schwab AP, Banks MK. Phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil: part 1. Dissipation of target contaminants. Int J Phytoremediation. 2007;9:355–370. doi: 10.1080/15226510701603858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Coover MP, Sims RC (1987) The effect of temperature on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon persistence in an unacclimated agricultural soil. Hazardous waste and hazardous materials, 4:69–82
  11. Fan SX, Li PJ, Gong ZQ, Ren WX, He N. Promotion of pyrene degradation in rhizosphere of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Chemosphere. 2008;71:1593–1598. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Flowers L, Rieth SH, Cogliano VJ, Foureman GL, Hertzberg R, Hofmann EL, Murphy DL, Nesnow S, Schoeny RS. Health assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures: current practices and future directions. Polycycl Aromat Comp. 2002;22:811–821. doi: 10.1080/10406630213574. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hodge A, Robinson D, Fitter A. Are microorganisms more effective than plants at competing for nitrogen? Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:304–308. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01656-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hutchinson SL, Schwab AP, Banks MK. Phytoremediation of aged petroleum sludge: effect of irrigation techniques and scheduling. J Environ Qual. 2001;30:1516–1522. doi: 10.2134/jeq2001.3051516x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnsen AR, Karlson U. Diffuse PAH contamination of surface soils: environmental occurrence, bioavailability, and microbial degradation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;76:533–543. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1045-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Joner EJ, Corgie SC, Amellal N, Leyval C. Nutritional constraints to degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a simulated rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem. 2002;34:859–864. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00018-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Joner EJ, Leyval C, Colpaert JV. Ectomycorrhizas impede phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) both within and beyond the rhizosphere. Environ Pollut. 2006;142:34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaye JP, Hart SC. Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms. Trends Ecol Evol. 1997;12:139–143. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01001-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Keck J, Sims RC, Coover MP. Evidence for cooxidation of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. Water Res. 1989;23:1467–1476. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(89)90110-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li XJ, Li PJ, Lin X, Zhang CG, Li Q, Gong ZQ. Biodegradation of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by microbial consortia in soil and slurry phases. J Hazard Mater. 2008;150:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liste HH, Alexander M. Plant-promoted pyrene degradation in soil. Chemosphere. 2000;40:7–10. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00216-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lu RK. Analytical methods of soil and agricultural chemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  23. Moreira A, Fageria NK. Liming influence on soil chemical properties, nutritional status and yield of alfalfa. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo. 2010;34:1231–1239. doi: 10.1590/S0100-06832010000400022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Muratova A, Hubner Th, Tischer S, Turkovskaya O, Möder M, Kuschk P. Plant–rhizosphere-microflora association during phytoremediation of PAH-contaminated soil. Int J Phytoremediation. 2003;5:137–151. doi: 10.1080/713610176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ni JZ, Luo YM, Wei R, Li XH. Distribution patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons among different organic carbon fractions of polluted agricultural soils. Geoderma. 2008;146:277–282. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Patrolecco L, Ademollo N, Capri S, Pagnotta R, Polesello S. Occurrence of priority hazardous PAHs in water, suspended particulate matter, sediment and common eels (Anguilla anguilla) in the urban stretch of the River Tiber (Italy) Chemosphere. 2010;81:1386–1392. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peng RH, Xiong AS, Xue Y, Fu XY, Gao F, Zhao W, Tian YS, Yao QH. Microbial biodegradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:927–955. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00127.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Qian W, Ni JZ, Luo YM, Li XH, Zou DX. Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Chin J Chromatogr. 2007;25:221–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Samanta SK, Singh OV, Jain RK. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: environmental pollution and bioremediation. Trends Biotechnol. 2002;20:243–248. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01943-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Silva IS, dos Santos E, de Menezes CR, Faria AF, Franciscon E, Grossman M, Durrant LR. Bioremediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soil by native soil microbiota and bioaugmentation with isolated microbial consortia. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:4669–4675. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith KE, Schwab AP, Banks MK. Dissipation of PAHs in saturated, dredged sediments: a field trial. Chemosphere. 2008;72:1614–1619. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Song YF, Ou ZQ, Sun TH. Analytical method of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil and plant samples. Chin J Appl Ecol. 1995;6:92–96. [Google Scholar]
  33. Teng Y, Luo YM, Ping LF, Zou DX, Li ZG, Christie P. Effects of soil amendment with different carbon sources and other factors on the bioremediation of an aged PAH-contaminated soil. Biodegradation. 2010;21:167–178. doi: 10.1007/s10532-009-9291-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Teng Y, Shen YY, Luo YM, Sun XH, Sun MM, Fu DQ, Li ZG, Christie P. Influence of Rhizobium meliloti on phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by alfalfa in an aged contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater. 2011;186:1271–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wei SQ, Pan SW. Phytoremediation for soils contaminated by phenanthrene and pyrene with multiple plant species. J Soils Sediments. 2010;10:886–894. doi: 10.1007/s11368-010-0216-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wetzel SC, Banks MK, Schwab AP. Rhizosphere effects on the degradation of pyrene and anthracene in soil. In: Kruger EL, Anderson TA, Coats JR, editors. Phytoremediation of soil and water contaminants. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1997. pp. 254–262. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wilcke W. Global patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil. Geoderma. 2007;141:157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wilcock RJ, Corban GA, Northcott GL, Wilkins AL, Langdon AG. Persistence of polycyclic aromatic compounds of different molecular size and water solubility in surfcial sediment of an intertidal sandflat. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1996;15:670–676. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620150509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wild SR, Jones KC. Biological and abiotic losses of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soils freshly amended with sewage sludge. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1993;12:5–12. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620120103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wild SR, Jones KC. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in the United Kingdom environment: a preliminary source in inventory and budget. Environ Pollut. 1995;88:91–108. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(95)91052-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wild SR, Obbard JP, Munn CI, Berrow ML, Jones KC. The long-term persistence of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in an agricultural soil amended with metal-contaminated sewage sludges. Sci Total Environ. 1991;10:235–253. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(91)90037-F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wolz J, Schulze T, Lubcke-von VU, Fleig M, Reifferscheid G, Brack W, Kuhlers D, Braunbeck T, Hollert H. Investigation on soil contamination at recently inundated and uninundated sites. J Soils Sediments. 2011;11:82–92. doi: 10.1007/s11368-010-0267-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wu YC, Luo YM, Zou DX, Ni JZ, Liu WX, Teng Y, Li ZG. Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contaminated soil with Monilinia sp.: degradation and microbial community analysis. Biodegradation. 2008;19:247–257. doi: 10.1007/s10532-007-9131-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang HS, Zhang QG, Tai JC, Ge XL, Wang NN. Effects of growth years on soil pH and phosphatase activities in alfalfa fields. Chin J Grassland. 2009;31:32–35. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang XQ, Hu MG. The effect of alfalfa on physical and chemical properties of saline soil. Pratacult Sci. 2004;21:31–34. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang J, Yin R, Lin XG, Liu WW, Chen RR, Li XZ. Interactive effect of biosurfactant and microorganism to enhance phytoremediation for removal of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soils. J Health Sci. 2010;56:257–266. doi: 10.1248/jhs.56.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Science and Pollution Research International are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES