Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2012 May 22;140(1):53–63. doi: 10.1007/s10709-012-9657-6

Genetic variability of arrhenotokous and thelytokous Venturiacanescens (Hymenoptera)

Irene Mateo Leach 1,2, Steven Ferber 1, Louis van de Zande 1, Leo W Beukeboom 1,
PMCID: PMC3386485  PMID: 22729870

Abstract

The ichneumonid wasp Venturia canescens (Hymenoptera) has been studied extensively for foraging behaviour and population dynamics of sexually (arrhenotokous) and parthenogenetically (thelytokous) reproducing individuals. Here we report the development of a set of microsatellite markers for V.canescens and use them to show that arrhenotokous individuals have more genetic variability than thelytokous ones, which are even homozygous for all tested loci. Crosses between arrhenotokous individuals suggested one marker, Vcan071, to be linked with the Complementary Sex Determiner (CSD) locus and one, Vcan109, with the Virus Like Protein (vlp-p40) locus. The genome size of V. canescens was estimated to be 274–279 Mb. We discuss how both reproductive modes can give rise to the observed genetic variability and how the new markers can be used for future genetic studies of V. canescens.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10709-012-9657-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Venturia canescens, Genetic variability, Linkage, Microsatellites, Recombination, Reproductive mode

Introduction

Genomic information and genetic tools are essential for the genetical analysis of biological traits. They are available for many plant and animal species that are of economical value such as crops and life stock. However, very little genetic and genomic information is available for parasitoid wasps. Genetic marker linkage maps have been published for few parasitoids (Antolin et al. 1996; Laurent et al. 1998; Gadau et al. 1999, 2008; Holloway et al. 2000; Beukeboom et al. 2010; Niehuis et al. 2010). Molecular markers are also essential for annotating full genome sequences, such has recently been done for the wasp Nasonia (Werren et al. 2010). Marker development and genomic information provides the first step towards the genetic analysis of parasitoid behaviour and life history traits. This is needed to gain a better understanding of the behavioural ecology and evolution of parasitoids and their use in biological control (Roderick and Navajas 2003; Wajnberg et al. 2008).

The ichneumonid wasp Venturia canescens (Hymenoptera) has been studied extensively in behavioural ecology, such as for testing optimal foraging and energy allocation (e.g. Amat et al. 2006; Thiel et al. 2006; Lucchetta et al. 2008; Metzger et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2009; Desouhant et al. 2010; Lukas et al. 2010; Pelosse et al. 2010). V. canescens is a parasitoid of lepidopteran larvae that occur on figs and almonds in southern Europe (Driessen and Bernstein 1999). As all Hymenoptera, it has haplodiploid reproduction. Sexual reproduction under haplodiploidy is called arrhenotoky: unfertilized eggs develop into haploid males and fertilized eggs into diploid females. Asexual reproduction is called thelytoky: diploid females develop parthenogenetically from unfertilized eggs and males are absent. V. canescens is a rare example of a species that has both sexually and parthenogenetically reproducing individuals that occur in sympatry (Schneider et al. 2002). Arrhenotokous females have meiotic oogenesis that allows for recombination. In contrast, thelytokous females have a form of automictic parthenogenesis that allows for some variation among offspring, but will lead to an irreversible increase of homozygosity in populations over time (for details see Beukeboom and Pijnacker 2000; Mateo Leach et al. 2009b).

Schneider et al. (2002) studied the geographical distribution and genetic diversity of arrhenotokous and thelytokous populations of V. canescens in the Côte d’Azur (France) using both nuclear and mitochondrial markers. Analysis of the genetic structure of the populations revealed one widespread thelytokous lineage and a few rare ones with high genetic similarity to arrhenotokous individuals. In a later study, Schneider et al. (2003) found similar results with wasps collected from a 500 km transect along the Rhône Valley in Southern France. At that time only Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) nuclear markers and Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) mitochondrial markers were available which restricted the analysis of population structure. This lack of suitable markers for population genetic analysis prompted us to develop a series of microsatellite markers that are more efficient and reliable for intraspecific studies.

Another field in which application of molecular markers is particularly rewarding is that of locating genes underlying specific traits, such as the sex determining loci in Hymenoptera. Many hymenopteran species have a form of complementary sex determination in which sex depends on the allelic composition of a single or multiple loci (Cook 1993; van Wilgenburg et al. 2006; Heimpel and de Boer 2008). The CSD locus has been mapped in a number of hymenopteran species (Antolin et al. 1996; Holloway et al. 2000; Gadau et al. 2001) and cloned from the honey bee (Beye et al. 2003). However, the phylogenetic distribution of single and multiple loci CSD within the Hymenoptera is still far from clear, and the csd gene has not yet been isolated from any other species than the honey bee. V. canescens has been shown with genetic crosses to have single locus CSD (Beukeboom 2001). Another commonly used locus in V. canescens for genetic studies is the Virus Like Particle locus (vlp-p40). VLPs are important in parasitoid-host interactions as they coat the parasitoid’s egg preventing it to be detected and destroyed by the immune system of the host (Fedderson et al. 1986; Hellers et al. 1996; Reineke et al. 2006). vlp-40 Is a gene with two allelic forms differing in the presence of a short tandem repeat of 54 bp in the coding region (vlp+ and vlp−; Hellers et al. 1996). These two variants have been used to characterize arrhenotokous and thelytokous strains form the field and in the lab (Beck et al. 2001; Schneider et al. 2003). In this study we determine its linkage to the newly developed microsatellite markers.

Studies of biological traits in V. canescens, such as life history and foraging behaviour, can be taken further if genomic information is available, as that allows for uncovering the genetic basis of these traits. The aim of our study is to provide some basic genomic information of V. canescens, including its genome size and a set of microsatellite markers that can be useful for future biological studies of this species. This set of markers complements a previously developed set of 59 microsatellites for this species (Butcher et al. 2000), which proved to be uninformative for our studies. We apply these markers to investigate in more detail the genomic variability of arrhenotokous and thelytokous wasps using individuals from the same populations as Schneider et al. (2002). In addition, we use sequence data of the mitochondrial COI gene to support the observed differences in genetic variability between the two reproductive modes.

Materials and methods

Physical genome size estimation

The diploid physical genome size of V. canescens was determined by standard flow cytometry. Adult female wasp heads were homogenized in Galbraith buffer (21 mM MgCl2, 30 mM tri-Na citrate dihydrate, 20 mM MOPS, 0.1 % Triton X-100, 1 mg/l RNase, pH 7.2), filtered (50 μm), stained overnight in propidium iodide (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and loaded on a LFRII flow cytometer (BD BioSciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). As size standard we used whole body cells of Drosophila melanogaster and the hymenopteran Nasonia vitripennis whose haploid genome sizes are known to be 176 and 312 Mb respectively (Wilfert et al. 2007; Werren et al. 2010).

Microsatellite marker development

Genomic DNA from 10 arrhenotokous female wasps collected at Mont Boron in 1999 (Schneider et al. 2002) was extracted using a standard proteinase K/salt-chloroform Protocol (Sambrook et al. 1989). Presence and quality of DNA was checked on a 1 % agarose gel. A microsatellite genomic library was constructed according to the SSR capture enrichment method of Connel et al. (1998) by Baseclear B.V. (Leiden, the Netherlands). DNA was fractionated by nebulization and ligated to adapters (oligo AP-11: 5′-CTCTTGCTTAGATCTGGACTA-3′ and oligo AP-12: 5′-TAGTCCAGATCTAAGCAAGAGCACA-3′). Selection for a subset of adapter ligated fragments was done by PCR amplification with AP-11 adaptor as primer. Biotinylated repeat oligos (GAG, CTA, CAT, CAC, GAG and CAAC) were used to hybridize and isolate repeat sequences from the fragmented DNA. The fragments containing repeat sequences were isolated using streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads (Promega). One microliter of the selected fragments was amplified using AP-11 oligo, ligated into pCRII vectors (Invitrogen) and transformed into Escherichia coli DH10B cells according to Sambrook et al. (1989). Positive clones were selected for PCR amplification using M13 forward or reverse primers and the resulting fragments were sequenced on an Applied Biosystems DNA analyzer 3730 using Big Dye terminator V3.1 (Applied Biosystems). To characterize the repeats in the clone sequences, these were further analyzed using the Tandem Repeat Finder software (Benson 1999). On the selected sequences, primers were designed with software PRIMER 3 (Rozen and Skaletsky 2000).

Linkage analysis of the csd and vlp-p40 loci

For the linkage analysis of the csd locus a brother-sister cross was used similar to Beukeboom (2001) to create linkage disequilibrium between the csd locus and linked microsatellites. A microsatellite locus linked to the csd locus will be heterozygous in diploid females and homozygous in diploid males that carry two sex alleles that are identical by descent. All offspring were genotyped for 15 polymorphic microsatellites and male ploidy was determined with flow cytometry. For the linkage analysis of the vlp-p40 locus we crossed two strains that were known to harbour different vlp-p40 alleles. Segregation of the vlp-p40 and microsatellite alleles was scored in haploid sons based on the known linkage phase in their heterozygous mothers. For amplification of the vlp-p40 locus we used specific primers (VLPF 5′-CTCAATATGTGGGGTGGTGG-3′ and VLPR 5′-TCGCAGTGGCTTGTCAGAGT-3′) (Hellers et al. 1996). PCR reactions for vlp-p40 were performed in 0.4× PCR buffer magnesium free (Promega) supplemented to a final concentration of 1 mM MgCl2, 0.08 mM dNTPs (Roche), 0.2 pmol/ml of each primer, 0.4 units of Taq polymerase (Promega) and approximately 5 ng of template DNA. The PCR profile was 1 cycle of 2 min at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 55 °C, 1 min at 72 °C and a final cycle of 10 min at 72 °C. PCR products were checked on an 1.5 % agarose gel. Linkage was tested with a Chi-square test with Yates correction and a significance level of p < 0.01.

Microsatellite variation

Genomic DNA was extracted from the abdomen of 22 arrhenotokous and 7 thelytokous females from field collected populations (SOM Table 5). One female per population was used because wasps collected from a single site had a chance of being genetically related (see Schneider et al. 2002 for details). Fifteen microsatellite markers were selected based on reliability in amplification and variability for genotyping these 29 individuals; 26 wasps from the same populations as the ones used in Schneider et al. (2002), two additional populations from France, and one from Spain (SOM Figure 1; SOM Table 1).

The genetic diversity of microsatellite markers was quantified per reproductive mode using number of alleles, heterozygosity, allelic richness and allele frequencies observed in each group using Fstat (Goudet 2001). To determine whether there was a significant difference between the genetic diversity of the two reproductive modes, we performed a Wilcoxon matched pairs test on a set of 15 microsatellites to compare the observed heterozygosities and a t test to compare the allelic richness between both reproductive modes using Statistica (StatSoft, OK, USA). An unrooted UPGMA tree using Nei’s standard genetic distance DS (Nei 1987) was constructed with the software package POPULATIONS (available at: http://bioinformatics.org/~tryphon/populations/). The genetic variability per individual was calculated as the number of heterozygous markers divided by the number of markers amplified. The mean heterozygosity per reproductive mode was compared with a two sample t test using the statistical package Statistix 4.0 analytical software.

Mitochondrial DNA analysis

A 449-bp fragment of the mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) gene was amplified by PCR with primers COI Vcan F 5′-GGTTTGGCTCTATTGGGATAA-3′ and COI Vcan R 5′-AAAATGTTGAGGGAAAAATGTTAGA-3′. PCR reactions were carried out in a 25 μl reaction volume containing approximately 5 ng of DNA, 1× PCR buffer magnesium free (Promega), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs (Roche), 0.2 μM of each primer and 0.4 units of Taq polymerase (Promega). The cycling conditions were 1 min denaturation at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 94 °C, 1 min annealing at 55 °C, and 1 min and 30 s extension at 72 °C, ending with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were purified with isopropanol and sequenced in one direction using primer COI Vcan F with fluorescent Big Dye terminator (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) on a 377 DNA sequencer from Applied Biosystems. Mitochondrial COI sequences were aligned using ClustalX (Thompson et al. 1997) and haplotype diversity was calculated using DnaSP version 4.10 (Rozas et al. 2003). Genetic distances were calculated with DNADIST using the software package PHYLIP version 3.6 (Felsenstein 2004) to construct a distance tree.

Results

Genome size

The DNA content of female V. canescens head cells was 1.56 compared to D. melanogaster cells and 0.89 compared to N. vitripennis (Fig. 1). The physical size of the genome of V. canescens was therefore estimated to be between 274 Mb (176 Mb × 1.56) and 279 Mb (312 Mb × 0.89).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flow cytometric analysis of the V. canescens genome. The known genome sizes of (a) D. melanogaster and (b) N. vitripennis (dark grey shading) are used for comparison. Cell number is indicated on the y-axis and propidium-iodide (PI-A) concentration as a measure of DNA concentration on the x-axis. Genome size is estimated to be 274–279 Mb

Microsatellite marker development

Of 287 sequenced fragments from the enriched library, 143 sequences (49.8 %) contained a repeat motif of di-, tri- or tetranucleotides. 50 % Of the repeat motif containing sequences had one microsatellite motif, others had two (25 %), three (17 %) or four and more (8 %) repeat types. 53 % Of the microsatellites were dinucleotides, 32 % trinucleotides, and 15 % tetranucleotides. The proportion of perfect repeats (according to Weber’s definition, Weber 1990) was 46.6 %. Among the dinucleotide motifs the most common were TC/AG (39 %) and CT/GA (24.8 %) (SOM Table 2). Many different trinucleotide repeats were represented in the library: CAA/GTT (9 %) and AGA/TCT (7 %) being the most abundant ones. We also found a large diversity of tetranucleotide repeats of which GTGC/CACG and ATCT/TAGA were the most abundant ones (13 %). Our results are in contrast with the most predominant motif found by Butcher et al. (2000), which was GT, but consistent with motifs in other Hymenoptera (Estoup et al. 1993; Pannebakker et al. 2010). From the data summarized in Pannebakker et al. (2010), Apis mellifera is the most comparable species to V. canescens according to the proportion of microsatellites and type of repeats, followed by the three sister species of Nasonia. A total of 56 reliably amplifiable microsatellite markers could be developed (SOM Table 2). These are labelled Vcan060-Vcan115 following the notation of Butcher et al. (2000) and expand their set of 59 microsatellite markers published in Genbank.

Linkage analysis

We looked for linkage between some of our microsatellite markers and two loci of interest known from V. canescens. The csd locus was investigated in an inbreeding cross and found to be closely linked with marker Vcan071 (recombination frequency 6 %, p = 0.04, N = 31; SOM Table 3). The inheritance of the vlp-p40 locus and 27 microsatellite markers was investigated in haploid offspring of heterozygous females. Only microsatellite marker Vcan109 showed significant linkage with the vlp-p40 locus after Bonferroni correction with a recombinational distance of 4.7 centiMorgan (χ2 = 48, 246, df = 1, p < 0.0001, N = 64) (SOM Table 4). We were not able to construct a complete linkage map of our markers, because sample sizes per family were too small and the number of polymorphic markers that were shared between multiple families too low.

Microsatellite marker variation

Of the 56 newly developed microsatellites, only 15 were polymorphic in both arrhenotokous and thelytokous individuals. Twenty-two arrhenotokous and seven thelytokous individuals representing 29 populations were screened with these 15 polymorphic microsatellites. Table 1 summarizes the number of alleles, number of individuals amplified, observed heterozygosity and allelic richness per marker and reproductive mode. Allele frequencies are given in SOM Table 6. The number of alleles per locus varied from 2 to 11 in the arrhenotokous individuals and 1–2 in the thelytokous individuals. The arrhenotokous individuals had significantly higher observed heterozygosities than the thelytokous females (H O-arrh = 0.48, H O-thel = 0, Wilcoxon matched pairs test, Z = 3.38, p = 0.0007, N = 15 microsatellite loci) as well as higher allelic richness values (A arrh = 3.73, A thel = 1.60, t test, t = 6.98, df = 14, p < 0.0001, N = 15). Although the number of females tested for each reproductive mode was different, this does not affect the average heterozygosity, but only the variance, as the likelihood of representation of low frequency alleles is smaller in the thelytokous sample. The mean proportion of heterozygous markers per individual (Table 2) is 0.50 (SE = 0.12, N = 21) in the arrhenotokous and 0.0 in the thelytokous (SE = 0.0, N = 7) sample. The difference in the heterozygosity level is significant (t test, t = 10.57, df = 26, p < 0.0001), even though three times as many arrhenotokous individuals were tested, and reveals that thelytokous individuals are completely homozygous for all tested loci. The total number of alleles observed in both modes is 76 alleles in the arrhenotokous group and 24 in the thelytokous one. Thus, proportionally the same number of alleles is present in both reproductive modes, but thelytokous individuals carry more often two similar alleles. There are four alleles that are unique for the thelytokous group.

Table 1.

Overview of variation at 15 microsatellites for arrhenotokous and thelytokous V. canescens

Locus Allele size Arrhenotokous Thelytokous
N A N ind H O A N A N ind H O A
Vcan061 178–200 7 21 0.67 4.206 2 7 0.00 1.989
Vcan062 250–266 4 21 0.67 3.662 2 7 0.00 1.989
Vcan063 174–186 4 19 0.53 3.030 1 7 0.00 1
Vcan064 277–295 6 21 0.48 3.468 2 6 0.00 2
Vcan065 200–236 11 21 0.86 7.251 2 7 0.00 1.989
Vcan066 240–260 5 21 0.67 3.635 2 7 0.00 1.989
Vcan067 139–160 6 16 0.44 5.334 2 7 0.00 1.989
Vcan069 217–229 5 18 0.50 3.344 1 6 0.00 1
Vcan070 213–230 5 19 0.37 3.388 2 6 0.00 2
Vcan071 228–246 7 12 0.25 5.627 2 6 0.00 2
Vcan097 140–152 3 20 0.40 2.500 2 7 0.00 1.989
Vcan109 189–193 3 19 0.63 2.867 1 7 0.00 1
Vcan110 172–174 2 17 0.00 1.842 1 6 0.00 1
Vcan112 143–161 4 21 0.33 2.731 1 6 0.00 1
Vcan114 237–251 4 19 0.47 3.007 1 6 0.00 1
Mean over loci 5.07 0.48 3.73 1.60 0.00 1.60

Given are allele size range, number of alleles (N A), number of females tested (N ind), observed heterozygosity (H O) and allelic richness (A) per locus and reproductive mode

Table 2.

Genetic diversity per individual

Arrhenotokous Thelytokous
Sample M H H/M Sample M H H/M
Bl’E A 97 10 6 0.60 Anth T 97 14 0 0
StJ A 97 13 6 0.46 Pmer T 97 14 0 0
Cd’Al A 97 13 9 0.69 Val T 97 13 0 0
StL A 97 14 6 0.43 Ant T 03 15 0 0
CsM A 97 13 5 0.38 Valb T 03 14 0 0
SV A 97 13 6 0.46 MtB T 03 15 0 0
GOT A 97 13 7 0.54 SJ T 03 13 0 0
Mt.B A 97 13 8 0.62
PdC A 97 14 7 0.50
Pmer A 97 13 9 0.69
Eze A 98 15 9 0.60
LB A 98 14 7 0.50
MtG A 98 13 5 0.38
MtV A 98 14 10 0.71
Anth A 98 15 4 0.27
Pm A 98 14 8 0.57
StG A 98 13 4 0.31
Vala A 98 14 7 0.50
VF A 98 14 7 0.50
VV A 98
Ant A 03 15 5 0.33
MtB A 03 14 7 0.50

The number of markers amplified for each individual (M), the number of heterozygous markers (H) and the heterozygosity per individual as (H)/(M) are indicated

Mitochondrial DNA variation

Six single base pair polymorphisms were found in the COI gene among 27 samples (20 arrhenotokous and 7 thelytokous) (Table 3) yielding five haplotypes. Haplotypes 1 and 2 differ in four base pairs, but haplotypes 3, 4 and 5 differed from one another in one base pair only. A distance tree of 27 samples is shown in Fig. 3. Haplotypes 1, 2, 3 and 5 were exclusive to arrhenotokous individuals whereas haplotype 4 was the only haplotype present among the thelytokous wasps and occurred in two arrhenotokous individuals. These results expand those of Schneider et al. (2002) who could only distinguish two haplotypes based on RFLPs. The genetic distance analysis (Fig. 2) indicated a clear differentiation between both reproductive modes but there was no obvious clustering of arrhenotokous individuals according to their mitochondrial haplotype or geographical origin.

Table 3.

Mutation positions of mitochondrial haplotypes

Position
Haplotype 018 019 020 301 397 419
Hap 1 T C A A
Hap 2 A G G A
Hap 3 T A T A A
Hap 4 T A T A G
Hap 5 C A T A A

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Unrooted cladogram based on the 449 bp mitochondrial COI sequence. Genetic distances were calculated using the F84 method in PHYLIP version 3.6 (Felsenstein 2004). Colours indicate the haplotypes. Location abbreviations are listed in SOM Table 1

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Distance tree illustrating the relationships among arrhenotokous and thelytokous individuals of V. canescens. The tree was based on Nei’s standard genetic distance DS (Nei 1987) using 15 microsatellite loci. Colours indicate the haplotype of each individual. Location abbreviations are listed in SOM Table 1

Discussion

The physical genome size of the parasitoid wasp V. canescens was estimated to be between 274 and 279 Mb which is slightly smaller than the genome of the parasitoid N. vitripennis (312 Mb, Werren et al. 2010), and comparable to the hymenopterans Trichogramma (246 Mb) and the honey bee (262 Mb) (The Honey bee Genome Consortium 2006; Wilfert et al. 2007).

We developed a set of microsatellite markers for V. canescens and used it to compare genetic variability of arrhenotokous and thelytokous individuals. They complement previously reported microsatellite markers (Butcher et al. 2000) which were largely monomorphic in our study populations. A subset of our new markers was polymorphic and we focused on those 15 that were variable in both reproductive modes.

Variation at microsatellite markers in thelytokous wasps is governed by the cytological mode of parthenogenesis (Stouthamer and Kazmer 1994). Beukeboom and Pijnacker (2000) reported central fusion automictic parthenogenesis as the mode of diploidy restoration in thelytokous eggs of V. canescens. This mechanism allows recombination to occur in early stages of oogenesis, but leads to an increase of homozygosity. Distal loci will become homozygous over generations while loci near a centromere will remain heterozygous because recombination results only in homozygosity of those loci that are on the exchanged chromatids and cross-overs are reduced near the centromeres. As a consequence, thelytokous individuals are expected to be more homozygous than arrhenotokous ones (Speicher et al. 1965; Crozier 1971; Beukeboom and Pijnacker 2000). The degree of heterozygosity and the allelic richness of 15 microsatellite markers was found to be higher in arrhenotokous than thelytokous individuals, which is in agreement with this prediction. Even more, all thelytokous individuals were completely homozygous which suggest that all markers were on distal portions of the chromosomes and/or that the fixed heterozygous regions near centromeres were small. This result also indicates that recombination is not reduced under thelytokous reproduction in this species, which is in agreement with a study on the thelytokous parasitoid Lysiphlebus fabarum, even though not all loci were homozygous in this species (Sandrock and Vorburger 2011). The first study of genetic variability in combination with central fusion was in the cape honey bee, Apis mellifera capensis. In this species thelytokous queens did not have reduced recombination (Oldroyd et al. 2008), but thelytokously reproducing workers retained high levels of heterozygosity suggesting strong recombination suppression (Baudry et al. 2004; Oldroyd et al. 2011). Recently, an even more extreme case of reduced recombination in thelytokous individuals was described for the little fire ant Wasmannia auropunctata (Rey et al. 2011). Thelytokous queens of this species produce workers via automictic parthenogenesis with central fusion, which apparently do not undergo any homozygosation. The authors suggest that maintenance of genetic variation by heterozygosity as a result of extreme low recombination rates and automixis, confers a selective advantage to asexual reproducing W. auropunctata. More studies of thelytokous species are needed to understand how and why recombination is suppressed in some species (cape honey bee, little fire ant) but not in others (parasitoids V. canescens, L. fabarum).

As shown in the distance tree of Fig. 2, the arrhenotokous and thelytokous individuals are completely separated according to the nuclear marker composition. There are four unique alleles in the thelytokous populations that are not found among the arrhenotokous individuals. There are five mitochondrial haplotypes that showed an accurate association with reproductive mode: thelytokous individuals had exclusively haplotype 4, which was shared with arrhenotokous individuals among which also other haplotypes were present. The most likely explanation for this pattern among our samples is a single origin of thelytoky from arrhenotokous individuals with haplotype 4. Subsequent homozygosation of the genome has likely resulted in the rapid nuclear differentiation of the thelytokous individuals.

We looked for possible linkage of the microsatellite markers with two known loci of V. canescens. The sex determination locus csd appears to be associated with marker Vcan071, as the number of homozygous diploid males for this microsatellite locus is significantly deviant from expected values (χ2 (GOF) = 5.88; df = 1; 0.01 < p < 0.025) corresponding to a recombination distance of 18 cM (3/17, SOM Table 3). The sex locus has been mapped to a single location in other Hymenoptera such as Bombus terrestris (Gadau et al. 2001), Bracon hebetor (Antolin et al. 1996) and Bracon sp. near hebetor (Holloway et al. 2000). In the honey bee csd has not only been mapped (Hunt and Page 1995) and physically located on chromosome VIII (Beye and Moritz 1996), but also been isolated and characterized (Beye et al. 2003; Hasselmann et al. 2008; Gempe et al. 2009). The vlp-p40 locus, that plays a role in protecting the wasp egg from its host immunity response (Hellers et al. 1996), is linked to marker Vcan109 with a recombination distance of 4.7 cM (SOM Table 4). As V. canescens has N = 11 chromosomes to find one linked marker out of 27 tested is according to expectation. Hence, our results are consistent with a single and unlinked position of these two genes in the V. canescens genome.

We can compare the degree of homozygosity at the two loci vlp-p40 and csd and their linked markers between arrhenotokous and thelytokous individuals. Complementary sex determination means that femaleness depends on heterozygosity of the csd locus. The csd locus is expected to be heterozygous in both arrhenotokous and thelytokous females. CSD is only compatible with thelytoky (all female production) if the csd locus is located in a region were heterozygosity is maintained, such as near a centromere or in an inversion (Beukeboom and Pijnacker 2000). The linked Vcan071 marker is therefore expected to have a higher degree of heterozygosity in thelytokous individuals than unlinked markers. In this study, Vcan071 as well as all other 14 microsatellites were homozygous in all tested thelytokous individuals. This could mean that the csd locus is highly recombining itself (Beye et al. 2003), or that linkage is not tight enough and sample sizes too small to detect heterozygosity. Malmberg et al. (2000) found among a sample of 102 arrhenotokous and 19 thelytokous females, 35 and zero heterozygotes respectively for vlp-p40 (χ2 = 18.97, df = 2, p = 7.6E-05). A reduced heterozygosity of this gene in thelytokous individuals is in concordance with the vlp-p40 locus undergoing genome homozygosation and it may therefore be located in a region of frequent recombination, such as distal from a centromere. In accordance, the linked marker Vcan109 was found to be homozygous in all seven tested thelytokous females.

We have shown that the developed microsatellite markers for V. canescens are a useful tool for study of the genetic variability of arrhenotokous and thelytokous individuals. The markers can also be used for more detailed genetic studies in V. canescens in the future, for example Quantitative Trait Locus mapping of life history and behavioural traits. Arrhenotokous and thelytokous females have different foraging behaviour and oviposition strategies (e.g. Amat et al. 2006) and they allocate energy in different ways (e.g. Pelosse et al. 2010; Lukas et al. 2010). Genetic study of these traits would be informative for other species and increase our understanding of the genetics of adaptation in parasitoids.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10709_2012_9657_MOESM1_ESM.ps (1MB, ps)

Collection sites in South-Eastern France. Location abbreviations are indicated in SOM Table 1. Modified after Beukeboom et al. (1999) (PS 1047 kb)

Acknowledgments

We thank Albert Kamping for help with statistical analysis, Vicky Schneider for providing wasps and Bernd Grillenberger for valuable help with tree construction.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Contributor Information

Irene Mateo Leach, Phone: +31-50-3615382, FAX: +31-50-3615525, Email: i.v.mateo.leach@umcg.nl.

Louis van de Zande, Email: louis.van.de.zande@rug.nl.

Leo W. Beukeboom, Phone: +31-50-3638448, FAX: +31-50-3632412, Email: l.w.beukeboom@rug.nl

References

  1. Amat I, Desouhant E, Bernstein C. The influence of temperature and host availability on the host exploitation strategies of sexual and asexual parasitic wasps of the same species. Oecologia. 2006;148:153–161. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0332-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baudry E, Kryger P, Allsopp M, Koeniger N, Vautrin D, Mougel F, Cornuet J-M, Solignac M. Whole-genome scan in thelytokous-laying workers of the cape honeybee (Apis mellifera capensis): central fusion, reduced recombination rates and centromere mapping using half-tetrad analysis. Genetics. 2004;167:243–252. doi: 10.1534/genetics.167.1.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Antolin MF, Bosio CF, Cotton J, Sweeney W, Strand MR, Black WC (1996) Intensive linkage mapping in a wasp (Bracon hebetor) and a mosquito (Aedes aegypti) with single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Genetics 143:1727–1738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Beck M, Reineke A, Lorenz H, Theopold U, Schmidt O. Two distinct reproductive strategies are correlated with an ovarian phenotype in co-existing parthenogenetic strains of a parasitic wasp. J Insect Physiol. 2001;47:1189–1195. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00102-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:573–580. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beukeboom LW. Single-locus complementary sex determination in Venturia canescens (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Neth J Zool. 2001;51:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  7. Beukeboom LW, Pijnacker LP. Automictic parthenogenesis in the parasitoid Venturia canescens (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) revisited. Genome. 2000;43:939–944. doi: 10.1139/g00-061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Beukeboom LW, Niehuis O, Pannebakker BA, Koevoets T, Gibson JD, Shuker DM, van de Zande L, Gadau J. A comparison of recombination frequencies in intraspecific versus interspecific mapping populations of Nasonia. Heredity. 2010;104:302–309. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beye M, Moritz RFA. Mapping the sex locus of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) Naturwissenschaften. 1996;83:424–426. doi: 10.1007/BF01142068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Beye M, Hasselmann M, Fondrk MK, Page RE, Omholt SW. The gene csd is the primary signal for sexual development in the honey bee and encodes an SR-type protein. Cell. 2003;114:419–429. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00606-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Butcher RDJ, Hubbard SF, Whitfield WGF. Microsatellite frequency and size variation in the parthenogenetic parasitic wasp Venturia canescens (Gravenhorst) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Insect Mol Biol. 2000;9:375–384. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00199.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Connel JP, Pammi S, Iqbal MJ, Huizinga T, Reddy AS. A high-through-put procedure for capturing microsatellites from complex plant genomes. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1998;16:341–349. doi: 10.1023/A:1007536421700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cook JM. Sex determination in the Hymenoptera: a review of models and evidence. Heredity. 1993;71:421–435. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1993.157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Crozier RH. Heterozygosity and sex determination in haplo-diploidy. Am Nat. 1971;105:399–412. doi: 10.1086/282733. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Desouhant E, Lucchetta P, Giron D, Bernstein C. Feeding activity pattern in a parasitic wasp when foraging in the field. Ecol Res. 2010;25:419–428. doi: 10.1007/s11284-009-0671-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Driessen G, Bernstein C. Patch departure mechanisms and optimal host exploitation in an insect parasitoid. J Anim Ecol. 1999;68:445–459. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00296.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Estoup A, Solignac M, Harry M, Cornuet JM. Characterisation of (GT)n and (CT)n microsatellites in two insect species: Apismellifera and Bombusterrestris. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:1427–1431. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.6.1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fedderson I, Sander K, Schmidt O (1986) Virus-like particles with host protein-like antigenic determinants protect an insect parasitoid from encapsulation. Experientia 42:1278–1281
  19. Felsenstein J (2004) PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) Version 3.6. Distributed by the author, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
  20. Gadau J, Page RE, Werren JH. Mapping of hybrid incompatibility loci in Nasonia. Genetics. 1999;153:1731–1741. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.4.1731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gadau J, Gerloff CU, Kruger N, Chan H, Schmid-Hempel P, Wille A, Page RE., Jr A linkage analysis of sex determination in Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Heredity. 2001;87:234–242. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00919.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gadau J, Niehuis O, Peire A, Werren JH, Baudry E, Beukeboom LW. Jewel wasp, Nasonia spp. In: Hunter W, Kole C, editors. Genome mapping and genomics in animals. Berlin: Springer; 2008. pp. 27–41. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gempe T, Hasselmann M, Schiøtt M, Hause G, Otte M, Beye M. Sex determination in honeybees: two separate mechanisms induce and maintain the female pathway. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html
  25. Hasselmann M, Gempe T, Schiøtt M, Nunes-Silva CG, Otte M (2008) Evidence for the evolutionary nascence of a novel sex determination pathway in honeybees. Nature 454:519–523 [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Heimpel G, de Boer JG. Sex determination in the Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 2008;53:209–230. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hellers M, Beck M, Theopold U, Kamei M, Schmidt O. Multiple alleles encoding a virus-like particle protein in the ichneumonid endoparasitoid Venturia canescens. Insect Mol Biol. 1996;5:239–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1996.tb00098.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Holloway AK, Strand MR, Black WC, Antolin MF. Linkage analysis of sex determination in Bracon sp near hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Genetics. 2000;154:205–212. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hunt GJ, Page RE. Linkage map of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, based on RAPD markers. Genetics. 1995;139:1371–1382. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Laurent V, Wajnberg E, Mangin B, Schiex T, Gaspin C, Vanlerberghe-Masutti F. A composite genetic map of the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma brassicae based on RAPD markers. Genetics. 1998;150:275–282. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.1.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu YQ, Bernstein C, Thiel A. Travel duration, energetic expenditure, and patch exploitation in the parasitic wasp Venturia canescens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009;63:1459–1469. doi: 10.1007/s00265-009-0800-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lucchetta P, Bernstein C, Thery M, Lazzari C, Desouhant E (2008) Foraging and associative learning of visual signals in a parasitic wasp. Anim Cogn 11:525–533 [DOI] [PubMed]
  33. Lukas J, Bernstein C, Gu HN, Dorn S. Could different environmental conditions select for different flight characteristics in sexual and asexual parasitoid Venturia canescens? Entomol Exp Appl. 2010;136:80–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.01000.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Malmberg T, Beukeboom LW, Driessen G, van Alphen JJM. Distribution of a VLP-protein polymorphism in sexual and asexual Venturia canescens populations (Hymenoptera) Proc Exp Appl Entomol Neth NEV Amsterdam. 2000;11:89–93. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mateo Leach I, Hesseling A, Huibers WH, Witsenboer H, Beukeboom LW, van de Zande L. Transcriptome and proteome analysis of ovaries of arrhenotokous and thelytokous Venturia canescens. Insect Mol Biol. 2009;18:477–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00890.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mateo Leach I, Pannebakker BA, Schneider MV, Driessen G, van de Zande L, Beukeboom LW (2009b) Thelytoky in Hymenoptera with Venturia canescens and Leptopilina clavipes as case studies. In: Schön I, Martens K, van Dijk P (eds) Lost sex. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–74
  37. Metzger M, Bernstein C, Desouhant E. Does constrained oviposition influence offspring sex ratio in the solitary parasitiod wasp Venturia canescens? Ecol Entomol. 2008;33:167–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00953.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nei M. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  39. Niehuis O, Gibson JD, Rosenberg MS, Pannebakker BA, Koevoets T, Judson AK, Desjardins CA, Kennedy K, Duggan D, Beukeboom LW, van de Zande L, Shuker DM, Werren JH, Gadau J. Recombination and its impact on the genome of the haplodiploid parasitoid wasp Nasonia. PLoS ONE. 2010;19:e8597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Oldroyd BP, Allsopp MH, Cloag RS, Lim J, Jordan LA, Beekman M. Thelytokous parthenogenesis in unmated queen honeybees (Apis mellifera capensis): central fusion and high recombination rates. Genetics. 2008;180:359–366. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.090415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Oldroyd BP, Allsopp MH, Lim J, Beekman M. A thelytokous lineage of socially parasitic honey bees has retained heterozygosity despite at least 10 years of inbreeding. Evolution. 2011;65:860–868. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pannebakker BA, Niehuis O, Hedley A, Gadau J, Shuker DM. The distribution of microsatellites in the Nasonia parasitoid wasp genome. Insect Mol Biol. 2010;19:91–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pelosse P, Amat I, Bernstein C, Desouant E. The dynamics of energy allocation in adult arrhenotokous and thelytokous Venturia canescens. Entomol Exp Appl. 2010;135:68–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00965.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reineke A, Asgari S, Schmdt O. Evolutionary origin of Venturia canescens virus like particles. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2006;61:123–133. doi: 10.1002/arch.20113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rey O, Loiseau A, Facon B, Foucaud J, Orivel J, Cornuet JM, Robert S, Dobigny G, Delabie JH, Mariano Cdos S, Estoup A. Meiotic recombination dramatically decreased in thelytokous queens of the little fire ant and their sexually produced workers. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2591–2601. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Roderick GK, Navaias M. Genes in new environments: genetics and evolution in biological control. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4:889–899. doi: 10.1038/nrg1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rozas J, Sanchez-del Barrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:2496–2497. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ. Primer 3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawtz S, Misener S, editors. Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Totowa: Human Press; 2000. pp. 365–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring. Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sandrock C, Vorburger C. Single-locus recessive inheritance of asexual reproduction in a parasitoid wasp. Curr Biol. 2011;21:433–437. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schneider MV, Beukeboom LW, Driessen G, Lapchin L, Bernstein C, van Alphen JJM. Geographical distribution and genetic relatedness of sympatrical thelytokous and arrhenotokous populations of the parasitoid Venturia canescens (Hymenoptera) J Evol Biol. 2002;15:191–200. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00394.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schneider MV, Driessen G, Beukeboom LW, Boll R, van Eunen K, Selzner A, Talsma J, Lapchin L. Gene flow between arrhenotokous and thelytokous populations of Venturia canescens (Hymenoptera) Heredity. 2003;90:260–267. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Speicher BR, Speicher KG, Roberts FL. Genetic segregation in the unisexual wasp Devorgilla. Genetics. 1965;52:1035–1041. doi: 10.1093/genetics/52.5.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stouthamer R, Kazmer DJ. Cytogenetics of microbe-associated parthenogenesis and its consequences for gene flow in Trichogramma wasps. Heredity. 1994;73:317–327. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1994.139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. The Honey Bee Genome Consortium Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nature. 2006;443:931–949. doi: 10.1038/nature05260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Thiel A, Driessen G, Hoffmeister TS. Different habitats, different habits? Response to foraging information in the parasitic wasp Venturia canescens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2006;59:614–623. doi: 10.1007/s00265-005-0088-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Van Wilgenburg E, Driessen G, Beukeboom LW. Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an “unintelligent” design? Frontiers Zool. 2006;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-3-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wajnberg E, Bernstein C, van Alphen J. Behavioural ecology of insect parasitoids: from theoretical approaches to field applications. Oxford UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  60. Weber JL. Informativeness of human (cc-dA)n (dG-dT)n polymorphisms. Genomics. 1990;7:524–530. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(90)90195-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Werren JH. Functional and evolutionary insights from the genomes of three parasitoid Nasonia species. Science. 2010;327:343–348. doi: 10.1126/science.1178028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wilfert L, Gadau J, Schmid-Hempel P. Variation in genomic recombination rates among animal taxa and the case of social insects. Heredity. 2007;98:189–197. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

10709_2012_9657_MOESM1_ESM.ps (1MB, ps)

Collection sites in South-Eastern France. Location abbreviations are indicated in SOM Table 1. Modified after Beukeboom et al. (1999) (PS 1047 kb)


Articles from Genetica are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES