Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2012 Jul 27;2012:bcr0220125942. doi: 10.1136/bcr.02.2012.5942

Treatment of dry age-related macular degeneration with dobesilate

P Cuevas 1, L A Outeiriño 2, J Angulo 1, G Giménez-Gallego 3
PMCID: PMC3387461  PMID: 22729337

Abstract

The authors present anatomical and functional evidences of dry age-macular degeneration improvement, after intravitreal treatment with dobesilate. Main outcomes measures were normalisation of retinal structure and function, assessed by optical coherence tomography, fundus-monitored microperimetry, electrophysiology and visual acuity. The effect might be related to the normalisation of the outer retinal architecture.

Background

This is a very safe and promising efficient treatment for dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Case presentation

This is a representative case from an institutional trial using dobesilate therapy in early dry AMD. This early stage of AMD may not be evident by ophthalmoscopic examination but can be inferred by reduced retinal function.1 Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is unequivocally the method for accurate early morphological detection, in vivo, of outer retinal layer changes in dry AMD.2 3

This study was performed with patient’s consent after the Ethical Committee approval of our Institution. A 54-year-old man presented with methamorphia in his right eye. A comprehensive ocular examination including Shellen visual acuity measurements and OCT was performed at baseline and 7 and 14 days after dobesilate injection. Fundus-monitored microperimetry was performed at baseline and after 14 days of treatment. The patient received an intravitreal solution of dobesilate (150 μl) under sterile conditions, following the International Guidelines for intravitreal injections4 in his right eye. Dobesilate was administered as a 12.5% solution of diethylammonium 2,5-dihydroxybenzenesulfonate (etamsylate; Dicynone Sanofi-Aventis). The pH of the solution was 3.2 at the opening of the phial and 5.2 after a 1:20 dilution in Milli-Q water, respectively. Mitogenesis experiments carried out as described by Fernández et al5 show that etamsylate inhibits FGF-driven mitogenesis with the same efficiency than the potassium dobesilate salt employed in those studies which first demonstrated this inhibitory activity (not shown).

As depicted in the OCT image before treatment (figure 1A), the patient had both foveal and temporal extrafoveal photoreceptor disruption. At baseline, inner retinal layers were normal, whereas the outer retinal layers showed structural alterations: 1) the integrity of photoreceptor inner segment and outer segment was not preserved (layers corresponding to those labelled 1 and 2 at the inset); 2) retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) showed rarefactions and thinning (layer labelled 3 at the red framed inset). In contrast, as figure 1B,C show, normalisation of outer retinal layers was achieved after dobesilate treatment. In addition, central foveal thickness increased after dobesilate treatment (138 μm at baseline vs 200 μm after 7 days of treatment). Retinal sensitivity map assessed by fundus-monitored microperimetry normalised after 14 days of treatment (figure 2A,B). The normalisation of retinal structure was associated with a gain of visual acuity: 0.4 at baseline versus 0.8 and 0.9 after 7 and 14 days of treatment, respectively. As an additional functional assessment, a full field electroretinogram (ERG) of the treated right eye of the patient was performed after 1 month of treatment, according to standard protocols recommended by the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, and compared with the record of the normal untreated left eye. As figure 3 shows, ERG patterns were similar in untreated and treated eye, suggesting no photoreceptor toxicity of intravitreal dobesilate.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Optical coherence tomogram before treatment showing interface of the inner and outer segment of the photoreceptor layer. RPE/Bruch’s membrane complex was disturbed with absence in many sites (A). The eye 7 days after receiving intravitreal injection of dobesilate, with marked resolution of outer retinal layers (B). Aspect of the eye after 14 days of intravitreal dobesilate treatment (C). Right panels represent magnification of insets from A, B and C, respectively, each one framed in a different colour. (1) Interface of the inner and outer segment of the photoreceptor layer. (2) Outer segment-retinal pigment epithelium interdigitation. (3) Retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch’s membrane complex. (4) Choriocapillaries and choroidea.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Fundus-monitored microperimetry map before (A) and after 14 days (B) of intravitreal dobesilate treatment.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

ERG traces corresponding to untreated and treated eyes, respectively, 1 month after intravitreal dobesilate injection. Traces corresponding to two subsequent measurements are superimposed in each case as estimation of its reproducibility.

Discussion

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is estimated to affect between 30 and 50 million people worldwide,6 and is the most common cause of legal blindness in industrialised countries.7 It represents a chronic disease with progressive stages and variable rates of progression over time. Clinically and histologically, AMD is generally classified into two major subtypes: dry or non-exudative AMD, of which geographic atrophy is a severe form, and wet or exudative AMD. Dry AMD progresses more slowly and manifests RPE and photoreceptor dysfunction and degeneration.8 Wet AMD, on the other hand, is more debilitating and often develops after early dry AMD. The key feature of wet AMD is choroidal neovascularisation (CNV), the growth of new blood vessels from the choroids into the region underlying the RPE or extending into the subretinal space.9 The holy grail of therapy for AMD is to avoid the development of CNV. Despite a recent breakthrough with antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular AMD, so far, there are no treatments available for patients with dry AMD. To identify potential targets for intervention, a better understanding of the pathogenesis of dry AMD appears mandatory. Although the aetiology of AMD is not completely understood, it is indisputable that inflammation has a critical role in both dry and wet AMD.8 1014 Consequently, conventional therapies based on inhibiting angiogenesis do not seem an appropriate strategy in the case of dry AMD. However, the aetiology of the disease suggests that the treatment of inflammation could be a suitable alternative to treat dry AMD.

The subretinal space, the interface between the apical surface of the RPE and the outer segments of photoreceptors, is a locus of particular interest in the relationship between inflammation and AMD. Microglial cell activation in the outer retina has been proposed as part of the pathogenic mechanism in some retinal diseases including AMD with its implication of photoreceptor and RPE loss.13 15 16 Microglial cells are the resident macrophages of the central nervous system that synthesise fibroblast growth factor (FGF) when they become activated. Since they also express FGF receptors, these growth factors should autocrinely contribute to sustain a chronic inflammation.1719 In healthy retina, microglial cells are located in inactivated conditions mainly in the inner retina. Under normal conditions, the subretinal space is a zone of special immune privilege20 maintained by the activity of RPE cells which secrete immunosuppressive factors into this space,21 and also by the notable absence of retinal microglia in the outer retina.22 However, under conditions of advanced age and photoreceptor injury, retinal microglia cells translocate from the inner retina into the outer retina and accumulate in the subretinal space, where they acquire the morphological features of activation.23 24 Importantly, activated microglia is found in the subretinal space of patients with AMD.25

FGF, in spite of being an angiogenesis promoter,26 is involved also in inflammation2730 and seems to play key roles in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases as well as in AMD, through activation of microglial cells.19 The aim of the present interventional case was to find out whether intravitreal dobesilate, a FGF inhibitor,5 could constitute a therapeutic option in the treatment of dry AMD. The case here presented suggests that, indeed, dobesilate could be an efficient drug for early treatment of dry AMD. Although the implication of FGF in microglial cell migration from the inner retina to the outer retina, and its activation in this site in AMD has not been specifically studied, the general antimigratory5 and anti-inflammatory activities3133 of dobesilate could explain its efficacy in dry AMD.

Calcium dobesilte is the active principle of Doxium, a drug used for more than 35 years that has been orally administered for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy with a good safety profile.34 Haritoglu et al35 have carried out a well-statistically performed study to assess the real clinical benefits of oral calcium dobesilate (Doxium) in the treatment of diabetic retinopathies. The study concluded that the oral administration of dobesilate did not show statistically significant clinical benefits. The discrepancy between these last results and those reported here may be explained on the basis of the administration procedures. Probably the oral administration is not the best choice for dobesilate to reach the adequate concentration at the retina. Dobesilate has a very low product of solubility at the acidic pH of the stomach, and, further, readily oxidises at the duodenal pH. Accordingly, a local delivery seems a better choice in order to reach appropriate therapeutic concentrations of dobesilate in the case of well-delimited targets, as is the case reported here. The similarity of the ERG patterns of the treated and untreated eye (figure 3) shows that the intravitreal dobesilate administration does not seem to cause any obvious alterations of the retinal cells, since any damage of the photoreceptors that destroys the cells or reduces its responsiveness will lead to decrease in the ERG response amplitude.

Intravitreal dobesilate treatment led to normalisation of retinal structure and significant gain in visual acuity and may improve the future management of dry AMD. Obviously, the actual clinical value of dobesilate in dry AMD described here needs to be further investigated in a prospective randomised clinical trial with a longer follow-up. This study is ongoing.

Learning points.

  • Dry age-related macular degeneration is a retinal inflammatory disease associated with vision loss.

  • There are no treatments available for this condition.

  • Intravitreal dobesilate normalises retinal structure and function, paralleled with vision improvement.

Footnotes

Competing interests: None.

Patient consent: Obtained.

References

  • 1.Green WR. Histopathology of age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis 1999;5:27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fleckenstein M, Charbel Issa P, Helb HM, et al. High-resolution spectral domain-OCT imaging in geographic atrophy associated with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4137–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brar M, Kozak I, Cheng L, et al. Correlation between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence at the margins of geographic atrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:439–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aiello LP, Brucker AJ, Chang S, et al. Evolving guidelines for intravitreous injections. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 2004;24(5 Suppl):S3–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fernández IS, Cuevas P, Angulo J, et al. Gentisic acid, a compound associated with plant defense and a metabolite of aspirin, heads a new class of in vivo fibroblast growth factor inhibitors. J Biol Chem 2010;285:11714–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gehrs KM, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, et al. Age-related macular degeneration–emerging pathogenetic and therapeutic concepts. Ann Med 2006;38:450–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fine SL, Berger JW, Maguire MG, et al. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2000;342:483–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rodrigues EB. Inflammation in dry age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmologica 2007;221:143–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chappelow AV, Kaiser PK. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration: potential therapies. Drugs 2008;68:1029–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nowak JZ. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD): pathogenesis and therapy. Pharmacol Rep 2006;58:353–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Patel M, Chan CC. Immunopathological aspects of age-related macular degeneration. Semin Immunopathol 2008;30:97–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hollyfield JG, Bonilha VL, Rayborn ME, et al. Oxidative damage-induced inflammation initiates age-related macular degeneration. Nat Med 2008;14:194–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buschini E, Piras A, Nuzzi R, et al. Age related macular degeneration and drusen: neuroinflammation in the retina. Prog Neurobiol 2011;95:14–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Telander DG. Inflammation and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Semin Ophthalmol 2011;26:192–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang J, Ohno-Matsui K, Yoshida T, et al. Amyloid-beta up-regulates complement factor B in retinal pigment epithelial cells through cytokines released from recruited macrophages/microglia: Another mechanism of complement activation in age-related macular degeneration. J Cell Physiol 2009;220:119–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ma W, Zhao L, Wong WT. Microglia in the outer retina and their relevance to pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012;723:37–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Araujo DM, Cotman CW. Basic FGF in astroglial, microglial, and neuronal cultures: characterization of binding sites and modulation of release by lymphokines and trophic factors. J Neurosci 1992;12:1668–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu X, Mashour GA, Webster HF, et al. Basic FGF and FGF receptor 1 are expressed in microglia during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: temporally distinct expression of midkine and pleiotrophin. Glia 1998;24:390–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee M, Kang Y, Suk K, et al. Acidic fibroblast growth factor (FGF) potentiates glial-mediated neurotoxicity by activating FGFR2 IIIb protein. J Biol Chem 2011;286:41230–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Streilein JW, Ma N, Wenkel H, et al. Immunobiology and privilege of neuronal retina and pigment epithelium transplants. Vision Res 2002;42:487–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zamiri P, Sugita S, Streilein JW. Immunosuppressive properties of the pigmented epithelial cells and the subretinal space. Chem Immunol Allergy 2007;92:86–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee JE, Liang KJ, Fariss RN, et al. Ex vivo dynamic imaging of retinal microglia using time-lapse confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4169–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ng TF, Streilein JW. Light-induced migration of retinal microglia into the subretinal space. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:3301–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xu H, Chen M, Manivannan A, et al. Age-dependent accumulation of lipofuscin in perivascular and subretinal microglia in experimental mice. Aging Cell 2008;7:58–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gupta N, Brown KE, Milam AH. Activated microglia in human retinitis pigmentosa, late-onset retinal degeneration, and age-related macular degeneration. Exp Eye Res 2003;76:463–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Giménez-Gallego G, Rodkey J, Bennett C, et al. Brain-derived acidic fibroblast growth factor: complete amino acid sequence and homologies. Science 1985;230:1385–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Byrd VM, Ballard DW, Miller GG, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1) enhances IL-2 production and nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB in FGF receptor-bearing Jurkat T cells. J Immunol 1999;162:5853–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meij JT, Sheikh F, Jimenez SK, et al. Exacerbation of myocardial injury in transgenic mice overexpressing FGF-2 is T cell dependent. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002;282:H547–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rossini M, Cheunsuchon B, Donnert E, et al. Immunolocalization of fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1), its receptor (FGFR-1), and fibroblast-specific protein-1 (FSP-1) in inflammatory renal disease. Kidney Int 2005;68:2621–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zittermann SI, Issekutz AC. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF-2) potentiates leukocyte recruitment to inflammation by enhancing endothelial adhesion molecule expression. Am J Pathol 2006;168:835–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bussolino F, Biffignandi P, Arese P. Platelet-activating factor–a powerful lipid autacoid possibly involved in microangiopathy. Acta Haematol 1986;75:129–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Piller NB. Assessment of the anti-inflammatory action of calcium dobesilate. Effect on macrophages attaching to subcutaneously implanted coverslips in guinea pigs. Arzneimittelforschung 1990;40:698–700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wollina U, Abdel-Naser MB, Mani R. A review of the microcirculation in skin in patients with chronic venous insufficiency: the problem and the evidence available for therapeutic options. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2006;5:169–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Allain H, Ramelet AA, Polard E, et al. Safety of calcium dobesilate in chronic venous disease, diabetic retinopathy and haemorrhoids. Drug Saf 2004;27:649–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Haritoglou C, Gerss J, Sauerland C, et al. ; CALDIRET study group. Effect of calcium dobesilate on occurrence of diabetic macular oedema (CALDIRET study): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 2009;373:1364–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES