Skip to main content
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2012 Feb 29;3(5):970–974. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.625

The clinical usefulness of urinary N1,N12-diacetylspermine (DiAcSpm) levels as a tumor marker in patients with colorectal cancer

YOSHIFUMI NAKAYAMA 1,2,, TAKAYUKI TORIGOE 1, NORITAKA MINAGAWA 1, KOJI YAMAGUCHI 1
PMCID: PMC3389634  PMID: 22783374

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of urinary N1,N12-diacetylspermine (DiAcSpm) measured by the colloidal gold aggregation method as a tumor marker for colorectal cancer (CRC). The preoperative urine of 113 CRC patients was collected, and the urinary DiAcSpm was measured by a reagent kit for DiAcSpm determination based on colloidal gold aggregation using automatic biochemical analyzers. The urinary DiAcSpm levels significantly correlated with distant metastasis and Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage. The positive rates of urinary DiAcSpm were significantly higher than those of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) or cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in stages 0+I, II, III and IV. The positive rates of urinary DiAcSpm were also significantly higher than those of serum CEA or CA19-9 in the early and advanced CRC groups according to the Japan Classification of Colorectal Cancer. Therefore, urinary DiAcSpm, measured by a reagent kit for DiAcSpm determination based on colloidal gold aggregation, may be useful as a non-invasive tumor marker in patients with CRC.

Keywords: N1,N12-diacetylspermine; DiAcSpm; urine; tumor marker; colorectal cancer

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most fatal types of cancer worldwide. In Japan, CRC was estimated to be the most common cause of female cancer-related mortality and the third most common cause of male cancer-related mortality in 2006 (1). Although chemotherapy has had a beneficial impact on the overall survival of patients with metastatic CRC, the prognosis remains relatively poor. Therefore, the identification of tumor markers that could detect early CRC and determine CRC patients at a high risk of recurrence are required.

Polyamines, including putrescine, cadaverine, spermidine and spermine, are alkylamines with multiple amino groups that are ubiquitously produced by eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Their metabolites are acetylated and diacetylated derivatives, respectively. Rapidly growing tissues usually have active polyamine synthesizing systems and contain large amounts of polyamines (2). Polyamine excretion in the urine may increase when such tissues are present in the body. A previous study indicated that the amount of polyamines excreted in the urine was higher in patients with cancer compared to that in healthy individuals (3). However, results of subsequent studies showed that the total amount, as well as the amount of individual free and monoacetylated polyamines in the urine, were not suitable as reliable tumor markers, as these yielded a number of false positive and negative results (4,5).

N1,N12-diacetylspermine (DiAcSpm) is a minor component of human urine that constitutes less than 0.5% of the total polyamine species in normal human urine. DiAcSpm was initially detected and characterized by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fractionation (6,7), followed by enzymatic detection. Antibodies highly-specific for DiAcSpm were previously prepared, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system applicable for the determination of urinary DiAcSpm was established (8,9). Several studies have reported that DiAcSpm in the urine measured by ELISA may be useful as a novel tumor marker of CRC (10,11), breast cancer (10,11) and hepatocellular carcinoma (12). Since then, the development of an ELISA procedure for measuring the DiAcSpm in the urine has enabled extensive clinical studies to be conducted.

A reagent kit for DiAcSpm determination based on colloidal gold aggregation that can be used with automatic biochemical analyzers was recently developed (13,14). This method is considered to be more rapid and more convenient than the ELISA method. Therefore, we evaluated the usefulness of urinary DiAcSpm as a tumor marker for CRC using a reagent kit for DiAcSpm determination based on colloidal gold aggregation.

Patients and methods

Patients

A total of 113 patients with primary CRC who underwent surgery at the Department of Surgery at the Wakamatsu Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoma, Japan, from 2008 to 2010 were recruited for this study, and their clinical data were analyzed (Table I). Of the 113 patients, 90 patients underwent curative surgery, and 23 patients underwent palliative surgery, including palliative resection, construction of an artificial anus or implantation of a central venous feeding tube and port for chemotherapy. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to the study. No patients received chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery. The clinicopathological findings were determined according to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classification (15).

Table I.

Characteristics of the 130 patients with colorectal cancer.

Characteristic No.
No. of patients 113
Gender
 Male 64
 Female 49
Age (years) (mean ± SD) 69.3±11.0
Location
 Colon 76
 Rectum 37
Histological type
 Differentiated 106
 Undifferentiated 7
Depth of invasion
 Tis (0) 1
 T1 8
 T2 18
 T3 53
 T4a 22
 T4b 11
Metastasis
 Lymph node (−/+) 52/61
 Distant (−/+) 90/23
TNM stage
 0 1
 I 18
 II 32
 III 39
 IV 23

TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis. SD, standard deviation.

Urine samples

Urine samples were collected from all 113 patients with CRC after informed consent was obtained. These samples were frozen at −20°C until use.

Determination of DiAcSpm by colloidal gold aggregation

The urinary DiAcSpm concentrations were determined using an Auto DiAcSpm reagent kit (Alfresa Pharma Co., Osaka, Japan) at the Alfresa Pharma research assay laboratory, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The assay is based on the specific binding between a bovine serum albumin-acetylspermin conjugate, as a DiAcSpm mimic, and a stable red-purple solution of colloidal gold antibody complexes (13). The cut-off values for urinary DiAcSpm, which were the mean +2 SD for healthy subjects, were 210 nmol/g·Cre in males and 250 nmol/g·Cre in females, respectively.

Clinicopathological assessment

The tumors were staged by two pathologists, who had no prior knowledge of the results of the assays, according to the 7th edition of the UICC TNM classification (15). Clinicopathological factors, including age, gender, tumor size, histological type, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and staging, were analyzed for associations with the urinary DiAcSpm levels.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± SD and were statistically analyzed using the Student’s t-test and regression analysis, as appropriate. The correlations between the parameters were also assessed statistically using the χ2 test with the Stat View-J statistical software package (version 5.0, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

A total of 113 patients diagnosed with primary CRC and their characteristics were analyzed (Table I). The urinary DiAcSpm levels in the patients with stage IV disease were significantly elevated compared with those in the patients with stage 0+I, II or III disease (Table II). Similarly, the serum CEA levels in the patients with stage IV disease were significantly elevated compared with those in patients with stage 0+I or II disease (Table II). However, the serum CA19-9 levels were not significantly different among the patients with different disease stages (Table II).

Table II.

Preoperative levels of urinary DiAcSpm, serum CEA and CA19-9 in patients with colorectal cancer.

TNM stage No. of cases Urinary DiAcSpm (nmol/g·Cre) Serum CEA (ng/ml) Serum CA19-9 (U/ml)
0+I 19 258.6±101.1 2.0±1.2 60.3±194.9
II 32 625.8±1204.3 6.1±11.1 19.7±20.3
III 39 367.9±548.0 14.2±54.1 25.2±45.0
IV 23 1935.7±2412.9a 45.2±79.6a 1290.4±4850.2
Total 113 742.0±1426.0 16.2±50.1 287.1±2210.8

The urinary DiAcSpm levels in patients with stage IV disease were significantly elevated compared with those in patients with stage 0+I, II or III disease. Similarly, the serum CEA levels in patients with stage IV disease were significantly elevated compared with those in the patients with stage 0+I or II disease.

a

p< 0.05.

DiAcSpm, N1,N12-diacetylspermine; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, cancer antigen 19-9; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis.

The urinary DiAcSpm levels significantly correlated with the presence of distant metastasis and the TNM stage. However, the DiAcSpm levels did not correlate with clinicopathological characteristics, such as patient age, gender, histopathological type, depth of invasion or presence of lymph node metastasis (Table III).

Table III.

Association between the preoperative levels of DiAcSpm and clinicopathological factors of the patients with colorectal cancer.

Preoperative value of DiAcSpma

Variables Negative Positive P-value
Age (years)
 ≤69.3 15 48
 >69.3 19 31 0.1023
Gender
 Male 19 45
 Female 15 34 0.9154
Location
 Colon 22 54
 Rectum 12 25 0.7046
Histological type
 Differentiated 31 75
 Undifferentiated 3 4 0.4469
Depth of invasion (T)
 ≤T2 8 19
 T3≤ 26 60 0.7203
Lymph node metastasis (N)
 (−) 15 37
 (+) 19 42 0.7904
Distant metastasis (M)
 (−) 34 36
 (+) 0 23 0.0004
TNM stage
 I/II/III 34 36
 IV 0 23 0.0004
a

The cut-off values for urinary DiAcSpm, which represent the mean+ 2 SD for healthy subjects, were 210 nmol/g·cre in males and 250 nmol/g·cre in females, respectively.

DiAcSpm, N1,N12-diacetylspermine.

According to the evaluation of the urinary DiAcSpm levels, the positive rates for the urinary DiAcSpm were 66.7 in stage 0+I patients, 71.9 in stage II, 48.7 in stage III and 100% in stage IV patients, respectively, which demonstrated a total rate of 69.0% in 113 patients. The positive rates of the serum CEA were 27.8 in patients with stage 0+I disease, 46.9 in stage II, 38.5 in stage III and 78.3% in stage IV, respectively, demonstrating a total rate of 44.2% in all patients. The positive rates of serum CA19-9 were 22.2 in those of stage 0+I disease, 15.7 in stage II, 20.5 in stage III and 56.5% in stage IV, respectively, which demonstrated a total rate of 26.5% in all 113 patients (Table IV). The positive rates of urinary DiAcSpm were significantly higher than those of serum CEA or CA19-9 in patients with all stages of CRC (Table IV).

Table IV.

Preoperative positive ratio (%) of urinary DiAcSpm, serum CEA and CA19-9 in patients with colorectal cancer.

TNM stage No. of cases Urinary DiAcSpm (%) Serum CEA (%) Serum CA19-9 (%)
0+I 19 66.7a 27.8 22.2
II 32 71.9b 46.9 15.7
III 39 48.7a 38.5 20.5
IV 23 100.0a 78.3 56.5
Total 113 69.0b 44.2 26.5

The positive rates of urinary DiAcSpm were significantly higher than those of serum CEA or CA19-9 in patients with all stages of CRC.

a

p<0.05,

b

p< 0.001.

DiAcSpm, N1,N12-diacetylspermine; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, cancer antigen 19-9; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis.

The patients were divided into an early and an advanced CRC group according to the Japan Classification of Colorectal Cancer. The positive rates in the early CRC group were 66.7 for DiAcSpm, 11.1 for CEA and 11.1% for CA19-9, and the positive rates in patients with advanced CRC were 69.2 for DiAcSpm, 47.1 for CEA and 27.9% for CA19-9, respectively. The positive rates of urinary DiAcSpm in the early and advanced CRC groups were significantly higher than those of serum CEA or CA19-9 (Table V).

Table V.

Preoperative positive ratio (%) of urinary DiAcSpm, serum CEA and CA19-9 in patients with colorectal cancer.

Status of CRC No. of cases Urinary DiAcSpm (%) Serum CEA(%) Serum CA19-9 (%)
Early 9 66.7a 11.1 11.1
Advanced 104 69.2b 47.1 27.9
Total 113 69.0b 44.2 26.5
a

p< 0.05,

b

p< 0.001.

Early; early CRC indicated until submucosal invasion; advanced, advanced CRC indicated more deeply invaded beyond proper muscle by the Japan Classification of Colorectal Cancer. DiAcSpm, N1,N12-diacetylspermine; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19- 9, cancer antigen 19-9; CRC, colorectal cancer.

Discussion

The present study has shown the usefulness of urinary DiAcSpm as a tumor marker for CRC as measured by the colloidal gold aggregation method. This method is considered to be more rapid and more convenient compared with the ELISA system, as this method uses an Auto DiAcSpm reagent kit method on colloidal gold aggregation and an automatic clinical analyzer. This method is able to measure a large number of samples at one time compared with the ELISA method.

Certain studies have reported the usefulness of the urinary DiAcSpm level as measured by ELISA in patients with CRC (10,11), breast cancer (10,11), and hepatocellular carcinoma (12). The positive rate of urinary DiAcSpm measured by ELISA for CRC patients (n=248) was 75.8%, which was markedly higher than the positive rates for serum CEA (39.5%, p<0.0001) and CA19-9 (14.1%, p< 0.0001) (10). Another study indicated that the sensitivity of DiAcSpm measured by ELISA in CRC patients (n=33) was 69.6%, which was also superior to that of serum CEA (46.8%) and CA19-9 (15.6%) (11). Hiramatsu et al also reported that the positive rate of urinary DiAcSpm measured by ELISA for 83 cases of breast cancer (60.2%) was higher than the sensitivities of CEA (37.3%, p=0.0032) and CA15-3 (37.3%, p=0.0032) (10). A further study indicated that the sensitivity of DiAcSpm measured by ELISA in breast cancer patients (n=28) was 46.4%, which was higher than that of serum CEA (3.8%) and CA15-3 (0%) (11). These studies have demonstrated that the urinary DiAcSpm level, as measured by ELISA, is useful as a tumor marker in patients with CRC and breast cancer. However, the positive rate of urinary DiAcSpm as measured by ELISA for hepatocellular carcinoma was 65.5%, which was similar to that for AFP or PIVKA-II (12). Results of the present study indicated that the positive rate of urinary DiAcSpm measured by the Auto DiAcSpm reagent kit based on colloidal gold aggregation in all CRC patients was 69.0%; this positive rate was similar to that measured by ELISA in the other studies (10,11).

In a previous study, the urinary DiAcSpm concentration, as measured by ELISA, was elevated in 60% of TNM colon cancer stage 0+I patients, whereas only 10% (p<0.0001) and 5% (p<0.0001) of these patients were CEA- and CA19-9-positive, respectively (10). The positive rate of urinary DiAcSpm measured by the colloidal gold aggregation method in the early CRC group was 66.7%, whereas only 11.1 (p<0.005) and 11.1% (p<0.005) of these patients were CEA- and CA19-9-positive, respectively (Table V). These studies indicated that the urinary DiAcSpm level is elevated from an early stage of CRC, and this increase can be detected by the ELISA and colloidal gold aggregation methods. Therefore, the measurement of urinary DiAcSpm may be suitable for screening patients for CRC. However, although the sensitivity of DiAcSpm for early stage breast cancer (stage I and II; 28.1%) was significantly higher than that of CEA (3.1%; p=0.0064) and CA15-3 (0%; p=0.001) (10), the positive rate of urinary DiAcSpm in the early stage breast cancer patients was low, therefore the measurement of urinary DiAcSpm may be not suitable for screening patients for breast cancer.

Although the use of conventional tumor markers, including serum CEA or CA19-9, require the relatively invasive collection of blood samples, the collection of urine is easy and does not result in any pain for the patients. Findings of the present study have shown that the urinary DiAcSpm level may be useful as a non-invasive tumor marker measured by a reagent kit for DiAcSpm determination based on the colloidal gold aggregation.

In this study, the positive rate of urinary DiAcSpm measured by the colloidal gold aggregation method in the patients with stage III was lower than the rates of the other stages. However, results from other studies have indicated that the positive rate of the urinary DiAcSpm measured by ELISA in patients with stage III was almost identical to that in the other stages (10). This discrepancy may be due to the small number of patients studied compared with the previous studies. Therefore, continued experiments with a larger number of subjects may be required to confirm the results.

In conclusion, the present study indicated that the urinary DiAcSpm level, as measured by a reagent kit for DiAcSpm determination based on the colloidal gold aggregation, may be useful as a non-invasive tumor marker for detecting patients with CRC.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms. Yuko Ueda and Miyuki Warashina for their technical assistance. This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.

References

  • 1.Matsuda T, Marugame T, Kamo KI, Katanoda K, Ajiki W, Sobue T The Japan Cancer Surveillance Research Group. Cancer incidence and incidence rate in Japan in 2006: Based on data from 15 population-based cancer registries in the monitoring of cancer incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Japn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42:139–147. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thomas T, Thomas TJ. Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001;58:244–258. doi: 10.1007/PL00000852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Russell DH. Increased polyamine concentrations in the urine of human cancer patients. Nat New Biol. 1971;223:144–145. doi: 10.1038/newbio233144a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Löser C, Fölsch UR, Paprotny C, Creutzfeldt W. Polyamines in colorectal cancer, evaluation of polyamine concentrations in colon tissue, serum and urine of 50 patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1990;65:958–966. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900215)65:4<958::aid-cncr2820650423>3.0.co;2-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bachrach U. Polyamines as markers of malignancy. Prog Drug Res. 1992;39:9–33. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7144-0_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hiramatsu K, Sugimoto M, Kamei S, Kinoshita K, Iwasaki K, Kawakita M. Determination of the amounts of polyamines excreted in urine: determination of N1,N8-diacetylspermidine and N1,N12-diacetylspermine as components commonly occurring in normal human urine. J Biochem. 1995;117:107–112. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hiramatsu K, Sugimoto M, Kamei S, Hoshino M, Kinoshita K, Iwasaki K, Kawakita M. Diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of N1,N8-diacetylspermidine and N1,N12-diacetylspermine in urine as novel markers of malignancy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1997;123:539–545. doi: 10.1007/s004320050102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hiramatsu K, Miura H, Kamei S, Iwasaki K, Kawakita M. Development of a sensitive and accurate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system that can replace HPLC analysis for determination of N1,N12-diacetylspermine in human urine. J Biochem. 1998;124:231–236. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hamaoki M, Hiramatsu K, Suzuki S, Nagata A, Kawakita M. Two enzymed-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) systems for N1,N8-diacetylspermidine and N1,N12-diacetylspermine using monoclonal antibodies. J Biochem. 2002;132:783–788. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hiramatsu K, Takahashi K, Yamaguchi T, Matsumoto H, Miyamoto H, Tanaka S, Tanaka C, Tamamori Y, Imajo M, Kawaguchi M, Toi M, Mori T, Kawakita M. N1,N12- diacetylspermine as a sensitive and specific novel marker for early- and late-stage colorectal and breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:2986–2990. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Umemori Y, Kuribayashi K, Tsuji N, Nishidate T, Kameshima H, Hirata K, Watanabe N. Evaluating the utility of N1,N12- diacetylspermine and N1,N8-diacetylspermidine in urine as tumor markers for breast and colorectal cancers. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:1894–1899. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Enjoji M, Nakamuta E, Arimura E, Morizono S, Kuniyoshi M, Fukushima M, Kotoh K, Nawata H. Clinical significance of urinary N1,N12-diacetylspermine levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Biol Markers. 2004;19:322–327. doi: 10.1177/172460080401900411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kawakita M, Hiramatsu K, Yanagiya M, Doi Y, Kosaka M. Determination of N1,N12-diacetylspermine in urine: a novel tumor marker. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;720:367–378. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-034-8_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Samejima K, Hiramatsu K, Takahashi K, Kawakita M, Kobayashi M, Tsumoto H, Kohda K. Identification and determination of urinary acetylpolyamines in cancer patients by electrospray ionization and time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2010;401:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, editors. International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM Classification Of Malignant Tumors. 7th edition. Wiley-Liss; New York, NY: 2010. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES