Abstract
Tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) is associated to the plasma membrane via a GPI-anchor and plays a key role in the biomineralization process. In plasma membranes, most GPI-anchored proteins are associated with “lipid rafts”, ordered microdomains enriched in sphingolipids, glycosphingolipids and cholesterol. In order to better understand the role of lipids present in rafts and their interactions with GPI-anchored proteins, the insertion of TNAP into different lipid raft models was studied using dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), cholesterol (Chol), sphingomyelin (SM) and ganglioside (GM1). Thus, the membrane models studied were binary systems (9:1 molar ratio) containing DPPC:Chol, DPPC:SM and DPPC:GM1, ternary systems (8:1:1 molar ratio) containing DPPC:Chol:SM, DPPC:Chol:GM1 and DPPC:SM:GM1 and finally, a quaternary system (7:1:1:1 molar ratio) containing DPPC:Chol:SM:GM1. Calorimetry analysis of the liposomes and proteoliposomes indicate that lateral phase segregation could be noted only in the presence of cholesterol, with the formation of cholesterol-rich microdomains centered above Tc=41.5°C. The presence of GM1 and SM into DPPC-liposomes influenced mainly ΔH and Δt1/2 values. The gradual increase in the complexity of the systems decreased the activity of the enzyme incorporated. The presence of the enzyme also fluidifies the systems, as seen by the intense reduction in ΔH values, but do not alter Tc values significantly. Therefore, the study of different microdomains and its biophysical characterization may contribute to the knowledge of the interactions between the lipids present in MVs and its interactions with TNAP.
Keywords: alkaline phosphatase, biomimetic system, Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), cholesterol, gangliosides, GPI-anchor, matrix vesicles, microdomains, sphingolipids
1. Introduction
Many studies referring to the participation of tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) during the calcification process have demonstrated the existence of two forms of the enzyme: membrane-bound and soluble TNAP. Although there are controversies related to the physiological role of TNAP, only the membrane-bound enzyme has been associated with the mineralization process [1-9].
TNAP is attached to the cell membrane via a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor. This anchor structure results in lateral mobility of the enzyme in the membrane, accumulation of the enzyme in specific microenvironments, as well as the release of the protein from the membrane by phospholipase C (specific to phosphatidylinositol) in a highly controlled manner [5,7,10].
Recent studies have proposed that a primary role of TNAP in the bone matrix is to restrict the concentration of extracellular inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi), a potent mineralization inhibitor, to maintain a Pi/PPi ratio permissive for normal bone mineralization [7,11-14]. TNAP is also a potent ATPase at the level of matrix vesicles (MVs) [12]. Furthermore, recent data suggest that the location of TNAP on the membrane of MVs plays a role in determining substrate selectivity in this microcompartment [6,13,14].
Given the crucial role of TNAP in the biomineralization process, the significance of MV for skeletal mineralization and the observations that the lipidic composition of MVs changes as mineralization proceeds, it is essential to understand the interrelationship of GPI-anchored TNAP and the lipidic components of the MV membrane [15].
It is important note that lipids are not distributed randomly in biological membranes. Glycosphingolipids (cerebrosides and gangliosides), which typically contains long chains of saturated fatty acids, form transitory aggregates at the external lamella that excludes glycerophospholipids, which typically contains an unsaturated fatty acyl group and a saturated fatty acyl group of smaller length. The long saturated acyl groups of sphingolipids can form more stable and compact associations with the rings of the cholesterol structure than the shorter and generally unsaturated chains of phospholipids, forming what is called “lipid rafts” [16]. The organization of biological membranes into microdomains is believed to play a key role in several cellular processes such as protein targeting and signal transduction [17]. The existence of these microdomains is explained mainly by the lateral phase separation of membrane lipids in a fluid liquid crystalline phase (Lα) and a liquid ordered phase (Lo) rich mostly in cholesterol and sphingolipids [18,19]. It was proposed that these lipid aggregates occur at the surface of the membrane driven only by distinctive intermolecular interactions, including van der Waals interactions between the long, nearly fully saturated chains of sphingomyelin and glycosphingolipids as well as hydrogen bonding between adjacent glycosyl moieties of glycosphingolipids [20]. These interactions may explain the existence of certain lipid compositions resistant to solubilization by detergents, particularly those containing sphingomyelin, cholesterol, glycosphingolipids and saturated phospholipids [21].
In plasma membranes, two classes of proteins would be associated with lipid rafts: proteins anchored to the membrane by two long chains of saturated fat acid linked covalently (two palmitoyl groups or one palmitoyl group and one miristoyl group) and GPI-anchored proteins, as is the case of TNAP. Probably, lipid anchors, as occurs with acyl chains of sphingolipids, form more stable associations with cholesterol and with the long acyl groups in lipid rafts, than with the surrounding phospholipids [22]. Moreover, GPI-anchored proteins would also be concentrated in detergent resistant membranes (DRM), Triton X-100-resistant membrane complexes (TRMC), detergent-insoluble glycolipid-enriched fraction (DIG) or glycosphingolipid-enriched membranes (GEM) [20,23,24].
A number of different biophysical techniques, e.g. Atomic Force Microscopy, Fluorescence Microscopy, Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Spin-label electron resonance spectroscopy, and others [20,21,24,25] have been applied to the characterization of lipid microdomains. These microdomains may occupy up to 50% of membrane surface, are slightly thicker and more ordered (less fluid) than the surrounding microdomains rich in phospholipids, being more difficult to solubilize by neutral detergents. They behave as “rafts” of ordered liquid sphingolipids in an ocean of disordered liquid phospholipids [26].
The microdomains present in membranes are not strictly separated and the proteins can move in a time scale of seconds. However, in a time scale of microseconds (more relevant for many biochemical processes mediated by enzymes and membranes), many proteins reside preferentially in the rafts [22]. So, studies with these systems are essential to understanding the mechanisms of action of TNAP in lipid interfaces.
We recently studied a mimetic system containing only DPPC and cholesterol and showed that the gradual proportional increase of cholesterol in liposomes results in broadening of the phase transition peak and the formation of microdomains [17]. Thus, enzyme incorporation influences cooperativity and induces further changes in calorimetric enthalpy by affecting lipid-lipid interactions. Here we report the production of biomimetic systems with microdomains for the incorporation of TNAP.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Materials
All aqueous solutions were made using Millipore DirectQ ultra pure apyrogenic water. Bovine serum albumin (BSA), Tris hydroxymethyl-amino-methane (Tris), 2-amino-2-methyl-propan-1-ol (AMPOL), sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), p-nitrophenyl phosphate disodium salt (PNPP), dexamethasone, glucose 1-phosphate, glucose 6-phosphate, fructose 6-phosphate, β-glycerophosphate, polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether (polidocanol), α-naphthyl phosphate, Fast Blue RR, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), cholesterol (Chol), sphingomyelin (SM), ganglioside (GM1), were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO, USA); sodium chloride and magnesium chloride were from Merck (São Paulo, SP, Brazil). 75 cm2 plastic culture flasks were from Corning (Cambridge, MA, USA). α-MEM, fetal bovine serum, ascorbic acid, gentamicin and fungizone were from Gibco-Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA). Analytical grade reagents were used without further purification.
2.2. Rat bone marrow cell isolation and culture
Cells were prepared and cultured according to Simão et al. [13]. Bone marrow was obtained from young adult male rats of the Wistar strain weighing 110-120 g. The femora were excised aseptically, cleaned of soft tissues, and washed 3 times, 15 min each in culture medium containing 10 times the usual concentration of antibiotics (see below). The epiphyses of femora were cut off and the marrow flushed out with 20 mL of culture medium. Bone marrow cells released were collected in a 75 cm2 plastic culture flask containing 10 mL of culture medium composed by α-MEM, supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum, 50 μg/mL gentamicin, 0.3 μg/mL fungizone, 10-7 M dexamethasone, 5 μg/mL ascorbic acid and 2.16 mg/mL β-glycerophosphate. Cells were cultured for 14 days at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5 % CO2 and 95 % air, and the medium was changed every 48 h. The cultures were observed and evaluated under an inverted phase microscope after 24 h, 4 days, 10 days and 14 days.
2.3. Preparation of membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase
Membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase, an osteoblast-specific marker, was prepared from cell culture as described by Simão et al. [13]. The cells were washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 2 mM MgCl2, removed with a spatula and resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 10 mM MgSO4 and 0.8 M NaCl (osmotic buffer).
The cell suspension was homogenized using a “potter system” for gentle cell disruption, at 4°C for 15 min, centrifuged at 1,000×g for 3 min and finally the supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C. The pellet corresponding to membrane bound alkaline phosphatase, was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 2 mM MgCl2, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -20°C.
2.4. Estimation of protein
Protein concentrations were estimated according to Hartree [27] in the presence of 2% (w/v) SDS. Bovine serum albumin was used as standard.
2.5. Enzymatic activity measurements
p-Nitrophenylphosphatase (p-NPPase) activity was assayed discontinuously at 37°C in a Spectronic (Genesys 2) spectrophotometer by following the liberation of p-nitrophenolate ion (ε 1 M, pH 13 = 17,600 M-1 cm-1), at 410 nm. Standard conditions were 50 mM AMPOL buffer, pH 10.0, containing 2 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM p-NPP in a final volume of 1.0 mL, as previously described [28,29].
All determinations were carried out in duplicate and the initial velocities were constant for at least 90 min provided that less than 5% of substrate was hydrolyzed. Controls without added enzyme were included in each experiment to allow for the nonenzymatic hydrolysis of substrate. One enzyme unit (1 U) is defined as the amount of enzyme hydrolyzing 1.0 nmol of substrate per min at 37°C per mL or mg of protein.
2.6. Solubilization of alkaline phosphatase with polyoxyethylene 9-lauryl ether
Membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase (0.02 mg/mL of total protein) was solubilized with 1% polidocanol (w/v) (final concentration) for 1 h with constant stirring at 25°C. After centrifugation at 100,000×g for 1 h at 4°C, the solubilized enzyme was concentrated as described by Ciancaglini et al. [6]. To remove excess detergent, 1 mL of polidocanol-solubilized enzyme (~0.05 mg protein/mL) was added to 200 mg of Calbiosorb resin as described by Camolezi et al. [30] and Simão et al. [13] and the suspension was mixed for 2 h at 4°C. The supernatant is the source of detergent-free, solubilized enzyme.
2.7. Liposome preparation
DPPC, Chol, SM and GM1, in appropriate molar ratio, were dissolved in chloroform and dried under nitrogen flow. The resulting lipid film was kept under vacuum overnight and resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 2 mM MgCl2. The mixture was incubated for 1 h at 60°C, above the critical phase transition temperature of the lipid, and vortexed for each 10 min. Large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) were prepared by submitting the suspension to extrusion (eleven times) through two 100 nm polycarbonate membranes in a LiposoFast extrusion system (Liposofast, Sigma-Aldrich). Binary systems constituted by DPPC:Chol, DPPC:SM and DPPC:GM1 (9:1) molar ratio; ternary systems constituted by DPPC:Chol:SM, DPPC:Chol:GM1 and DPPC:SM:GM1 (8:1:1) molar ratio and quaternary system constituted by DPPC:Chol:SM:GM1 (7:1:1:1), molar ratio, 10 mg/mL final concentration, were prepared and used in the same day.
2.8. Incorporation of alkaline phosphatase into liposomes
Equal volumes of liposomes (10 mg/mL) and TNAP (0.02 mg/mL) resulting in a 1:10,000 protein:lipid ratio, in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 2 mM MgCl2, were mixed and incubated at 25 °C during 1 h and the sample was centrifuged at 150,000×g for 20 min. The pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 2 mM MgCl2, to the original volume. TNAP activity of the supernatant and the resuspended pellet was assayed and used to calculate the percent of protein incorporation [13].
2.9. Dynamic light scattering measurements (DLS)
The determination of liposomes size distribution was performed by DLS, using a N5 Submicron Particle Size Analyser (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA). Average value (n=5) of the liposomes diameters was obtained at 25°C by unimodal distribution, previously filtered (0.8 μm), as described by Bolean et al. [17].
2.10. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
Transition phase temperatures (Tc) of the LUVs membranes prepared with different lipid compositions were studied by DSC. All LUVs suspensions and reference buffer employed in the experiment were previously degasified under vacuum (140 mbar) during 15 minutes.
The samples were scanned from 10 °C to 90 °C at an average heating rate of 0.5°C/min and the recorded thermograms were analyzed using a Nano-DSC II - Calorimetry Sciences Corporation, CSC (Lindon, Utah, USA). A minimum of at least three heating and cooling scans were performed for each analysis and all thermograms were reproducible. In order to ensure homogeneity in the analysis of the effect of the insertion of the enzyme and presence of different microdomains on the lipid phase transitions, we have chosen the simplest baseline correction to introduce the least amount of variability when comparing thermograms from different sets of experiments [17].
3. Results and discussion
3.1 Production and biophysical characterization of ternary liposomes and proteoliposomes with microdomains constituted by DPPC:Chol enriched by SM and GM1
Liposomes constituted by DPPC:Chol (9:1), DPPC:Chol:SM (8:1:1) and DPPC:Chol:GM1 (8:1:1) (molar ratios) were evaluated by DLS and DSC and the resulting thermograms are presented in Figure 1. All thermograms were analyzed by deconvolution for a better resolution of the existent distinct peaks in each case.
Figure 1.
DSC thermograms of liposomes (10 mg/mL). Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms were processed in excess heat capacity, Cp (kcal.K-1.mol-1) as a function of temperature (°C) of liposomes constituted by: (A) DPPC:Chol (9:1), (B) DPPC:Chol:SM (8:1:1) and (C) DPPC:Chol:GM1 (8:1:1), molar ratio. Dashed curves symbolize deconvolution analysis.
The average diameters are consistent with the membrane used in the extrusion method (100 nm) and low IP values were obtained for all liposome samples analyzed (Table 1).
Table 1.
Thermodynamic parameters of liposomes (10 mg/mL) constituted by DPPC, Chol, SM and GM1 with different lipid molar ratios.
| Liposome Composition | Lipid Molar Ratio | Diameter (nm) | IP | Peak | ΔH (Kcal.mol-1) | Tc (°C) | Δt1/2 (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPC:Chol | 9:1 | 175.5±7.07 | 0.09±0.08 | 1* 2 |
1.64 4.52 |
40.6 42.0 |
1.08 6.37 |
| DPPC:SM | 9:1 | 168.4±10.80 | 0.13±0.11 | 1 2* |
0.91 8.89 |
29.0 40.0 |
8.02 2.20 |
| DPPC:GM1 | 9:1 | 178.5±8.09 | 0.95±0.08 | 1 | 9.33 | 41.5 | 2.29 |
| DPPC:Chol:SM | 8:1:1 | 146.1±10.8 | 0.10±0.04 | 1 2* 3 |
2.29 1.87 4.79 |
27.8 38.9 40.8 |
23.52 1.66 7.98 |
| DPPC:Chol:GM1 | 8:1:1 | 169.6±13.02 | 0.27±0.12 | 1* 2 |
2.12 3.30 |
41.1 42.9 |
1.75 6.51 |
| DPPC:SM:GM1 | 8:1:1 | 245.7±18.25 | 0.72±0.23 | 1 | 8.42 | 40.5 | 3.70 |
| DPPC:Chol:SM:GM1 | 7:1:1:1 | 151.5±21.94 | 0.12±0.46 | 1* 2 |
2.54 4.20 |
39.1 42.3 |
2.88 7.82 |
Principal transition
As shown in Figure 1-A, DPPC:Chol (9:1) liposomes undergo lateral phase segregation, with the formation of cholesterol-rich domains (TC= 42.0°C) and cholesterol-poor domains (TC= 40.6°C) on the membrane, in agreement with previous studies [17].
The insertion of SM in the DPPC:Chol system provided a considerable broadening on the peaks as shown in Figure 1-B, increasing the Δt1/2 values (Table 1), evidencing a decrease in phase transition cooperativity. Furthermore, a large centered transition in Tc= 27.8 °C was observed in the thermogram, possibly related to the SM or DPPC pre-transition. The total enthalpy (8.95 kcal.mol-1) of the DPPC:Chol:SM system increased in relation to the DPPC:Chol (6.16 kcal.mol-1) binary system. This effect can be explained by the geometry of the SM molecule, capable of stabilizing the membrane through the hydrogen bridges interactions between the hydrocarbon chains.
It is known that the membrane's cholesterol and sphingomyelin clustering differentiate from the DPPC:Chol constituted membranes [31-33]. The compressibility of membranes containing SM/Chol was in fact much better than in membranes constituted by DPPC with equal cholesterol concentration [31,33]. Moreover, water permeability was lower in SM/Chol than in DPPC/Chol, indicating the formation of a more efficient clustering.
Natural SM normally constitutes a populational mixture with amide-bonds of the hydrocarbon chain differentiating in width and length (from 16 to 24 carbons) [34]. The hydrocarbon chain composition of the SM varies among the tissues, however, the presence of exceptionally long chains is common, giving the molecule a natural asymmetry. PCs normally have moderately long hydrocarbon chains (16-18 carbons) with lengths approximately the same [35].
GM1 are generally found in higher concentrations in the brain, whereas present in many types of cells and are known for residing exclusively in the extracellular monolayer of biological membranes [36]. In systems used as membrane models, such as unilamellar vesicles, it was shown that GM1 distribute themselves between the two surfaces of the monolayers [37,38].
In contrast to cholesterol, it is known that GM1, when added to DPPC-constituted vesicles, does not undergo lateral phase segregation [39,40]. As can be seen in Figure 1-C, the lateral phase segregation with a peak centered at a higher Tc (42.9 °C) than the characteristic DPPC Tc (41.5 °C) relates to cholesterol-rich microdomains. In this case, the presence of GM1 in the ternary systems influences mainly ΔH and the phase transition cooperativity (Table 1).
DSC and X-ray diffraction studies show that bovine brain GM1, with low hydration, exhibits a wide thermal transition and forms a cylindrical hexagonal phase instead of bilayer [41]. Aqueous dispersions with gangliosides and egg yolk DPPC were examined using electronic microscopy; lamellar structures were observed in low concentrations of gangliosides (<30%), spherical micelles in high concentrations of gangliosides (>80%) and cylindrical structures in the 45:48% GM1:DPPC ratio respectively. This suggests that the cylindrical structure represented an intermediary in the conversion of the lamellar phase to the micellar phase [42]. It is important to point out that the DSC curves obtained for GM1 presented in literature [43], alone or in vesicular systems in the presence of DPPC, are difficult to compared, since they have shown very wide transition peaks besides being obtained with very high heating and cooling velocities, which contributes to a loss in measurement quality.
TNAP was incorporated to liposomes forming proteoliposomes of binary and ternary lipid mixtures. In the proteoliposome's thermogram constituted by DPPC:Chol (9:1) (Figure 2-A) the lateral phase segregation can be noted. Since the same profile was detected for liposomes with the same composition, it proves that the enzyme is not capable of influencing the calorimetric profile of this system; however, the thermodynamic parameters are significantly altered. Comparing the thermodynamic parameter values of the liposomes shown on Table 1 with the proteoliposomes parameters from Table 2, an intense decrease in total ΔH can be observed, demonstrating how much the enzyme can fluidify the system.
Figure 2.
DSC thermograms of proteoliposomes (10 mg/mL). Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms were processed in excess heat capacity, Cp (kcal.K-1.mol-1) as a function of temperature (°C) of liposomes constituted by: (A) DPPC:Chol (9:1), (B) DPPC:Chol:SM (8:1:1) and (C) DPPC:Chol:GM1 (8:1:1), molar ratio. Dashed curves symbolize deconvolution analysis.
Table 2.
Thermodynamic parameters of proteoliposomes (10 mg/mL) constituted by DPPC, Chol, SM and GM1 with different lipid molar ratios.
| Proteoliposome Composition | Lipid Molar Ratio | Incorporation (%) | Diameter (nm) | IP | Peak | ΔH (Kcal.mol-1) | Tc (°C) | Δt1/2 (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPC:Chol | 9:1 | 62.1 | 132.7±8.75 | 0.11±0.05 | 1* 2 |
0.58 1.17 |
40.4 42.4 |
1.59 5.75 |
| DPPC:SM | 9:1 | 21.9 | 133.1±9.10 | 0.09±0.06 | 1 | 2.71 | 39.6 | 2.60 |
| DPPC:GM1 | 9:1 | 17.9 | 145.8±20.43 | 0.29±0.18 | 1 | 3.01 | 41.4 | 2.87 |
| DPPC:Chol:SM | 8:1:1 | 30.2 | 136.3±21.87 | 0.12±0.11 | 1* 2 |
0.56 1.24 |
38.6 41.0 |
1.93 7.18 |
| DPPC:Chol:GM1 | 8:1:1 | 30.6 | 127.5±18.63 | 0.22±0.12 | 1* 2 |
0.45 1.48 |
40.4 43.1 |
2.32 7.11 |
| DPPC:SM:GM1 | 8:1:1 | 27.6 | 140.7±21.89 | 0.27±0.16 | 1 | 2.11 | 40.5 | 5.00 |
| DPPC:Chol:SM:GM1 | 7:1:1:1 | 25.6 | 113.1±15.54 | 0.25±0.21 | 1 2* |
0.45 1.41 |
38.2 42.0 |
4.10 8.37 |
Principal transition
Tc values were not significantly altered. Regarding cooperativity (Table 2), it can be noted that the first centered peak at 40 °C becomes a little wider, however, the second peak centered at 42 °C becomes slightly more cooperative. The TNAP reconstitution in DPPC:Chol liposomes yielded a 62.1% incorporation of the catalytic activity.
In Figures 2-B and 2-C the thermogram profiles for the ternary proteoliposomes constituted by DPPC:Chol:SM and DPPC:Chol:GM1 (8:1:1) molar ratio, respectively, can be observed. In the first case we see that, in the presence of the enzyme the peak referring to the pre-transition is eliminated. In the second case, the profile stays very similar when compared to the liposome system, yet the peak distinction is more evident when the enzyme is present. Comparing the thermodynamic parameters, the presence of the enzyme fluidifies the systems, with a decrease in ΔH values of the proteoliposomes compared to the liposomes.
The TNAP reconstitution in DPPC:Chol:SM and DPPC:Chol:GM1 liposomes yielded an incorporation of around 30% of the enzymatic activity, demonstrating that the presence of SM and GM1 has a negative effect in the enzyme incorporation when compared to the values obtained for the proteoliposomes in the presence of cholesterol.
The spontaneous insertion of AP in lipid ordered domains was visualized using AFM, which supports the preference of GPI-anchored proteins for the lipid bilayer area in which lipid clustering is tight [25].
3.2 Production and biophysical characterization of binary liposomes and proteoliposomes constituted by DPPC:SM and DPPC:GM1
Next, we studied binary vesicles in the absence of cholesterol to examine the thermotropic behavior of SM and GM1 alone. For that purpose, DPPC:SM and DPPC:GM1 (9:1) molar ratio constituted liposomes were used (Figure 3). Deconvolution analysis enable the detection of a centered pre-transition at Tc=20.0 °C and a main transition peak at Tc=40.0 °C (Figure 3), in agreement with earlier studies [44,45].
Figure 3.
DSC thermograms of binary systems without cholesterol (10 mg/mL). Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms were processed in excess heat capacity, Cp (kcal.K-1.mol-1) as a function of temperature (°C) of vesicles constituted by: (A) DPPC:SM (9:1) liposome, (B) DPPC:SM (9:1) proteoliposome, (C) DPPC:GM1 (9:1) liposome and (D) DPPC:GM1 (9:1) proteoliposome, molar ratio. Dashed curves symbolize deconvolution analysis.
SM and PC have regularly cylindrical molecular forms, forming bilayers when hydrated to minimize free energy [46]. Nevertheless, SM exhibits a more complex behavior than PC in membranes [34,44,47]. SMs with saturated hydrocarbon chains with a length of 16 to 24 carbons have a main transition between 37 and 48 °C, with an increase in temperature, although not linear, with the increase in the carbon chain [47]. Tc values for SM are normally less affected by the cis-insaturation insertion in the carbon chain when compared to other phospholipids. The phenomenon was attributed to the bilayer stabilization by hydrogen bonds [47].
Through the data from Table 1 it is possible to notice a significant increase in the ΔH value for the DPPC:SM liposomes value (8.89 Kcal.mol-1) in relation to the DPPC:Chol liposomes (ΔHtotal = 6.16 Kcal.mol-1). This fact demonstrates that the SM molecule geometry is capable of stabilizing the DPPC molecule. This more efficient lipid packing can be in part explained by a better attraction of the van der Waals force between the saturated hydrocarbon chains and the DPPC.
The addition of GM1 to the DPPC vesicles was not able to affect the characteristic Tc of DPPC, showing evidence of just a slight broadening of the peak with decrease of cooperativity in the system phase transition (Figure 3-C and Table 1).
These data can be related with the results found by Reed and Shipley [43], which shows a small effect on Tc and broadening of the DPPC phase transition peak with and addition of up to 9.5% mol in GM1. In addition to that, we observed that the presence of GM1 was capable of increasing ΔH, thus making the vesicle systems more packed (Table 1).
It is important to note that lateral phase segregation was not detected in any of the thermograms (DPPC:SM and DPPC:GM1), under these conditions. Hence, cholesterol is likely responsible for this effect when two distinct peaks are observed in the thermograms referring to the ternary systems.
We can emphasize then that the DSC technique is an efficient method to study the microdomains formation and the changes in thermodynamic parameters caused by the different lipid compositions. Furthermore, this technique can give us an idea of the presence of the enzyme in membrane model systems. This method does not require the use of probes that might disturb the system. It is also insensitive to the size of the domain. Thus, the evidence of the presence of small domains, not resolvable with light microscopy, can be obtained [48].
As seen in Figure 3-B, the presence of the enzyme in proteoliposomes thermogram constituted by DPPC:SM (9:1), the peak related to the pre-transition is eliminated.
Regarding the DPPC:GM1 (9:1) (Figure 3-D) proteoliposomes, the enzyme is not capable of influencing the calorimetric profile of this system, but the thermodynamic parameters are expressively altered. By comparing the thermodynamic parameters of the liposomes presented on Table 1 with the proteoliposome's parameters from Table 2, we have a significant decrease in total ΔH values, demonstrating how much the enzyme can fluidify the system. Cooperativity is slightly affected with a small widening of the peaks (Table 2).
In the TNAP reconstitution studies in DPPC:SM and DPPC:GM1 liposomes around 20% incorporation of catalytic activity was obtained, demonstrating a negative effect even greater in the enzyme incorporation when compared to the values obtained for the DPPC:Chol constituted proteoliposomes.
Sesana et al. [49] have shown a reduction in hydrolysis Vmax of alkaline phosphatase in the presence of Chol and SM in proteoliposomes constituted by a PC matrix. Moreover, there was an increase in liposomes diameters. The presence of GM1, however, has provided a small increase in hydrolysis Vmax and did not significantly alter liposome diameters.
3.3 Production and biophysical characterization of ternary liposomes and proteoliposomes with microdomains constituted by DPPC:SM:GM1
To better understand these data, it was necessary to perform studies involving ternary systems constituted by DPPC:SM:GM1 (8:1:1 molar ratio), that is, in the absence of Chol, in order to perceive the consequences of the interactions of SM and GM1. The average diameter data and polydispersion values are shown on Table 1 for the liposome systems as on Table 2 for the proteoliposomes systems.
The calorimetric profile of this liposome is shown on Figure 4, where one can observe the elimination of the pre-transition characteristic peak, centered around 29 °C, which is present on the thermogram obtained for the DPPC:SM (9:1) liposomes.
Figure 4.
DSC thermograms of ternary systems without cholesterol (10 mg/mL). Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms were processed in excess heat capacity, Cp (kcal.K-1.mol-1) as a function of temperature (°C) of vesicles constituted by DPPC:SM:GM1 (8:1:1), molar ratio: (—) liposome and (- - -) proteoliposome.
Lateral phase segregation was not detected for this system, thus confirming that the SM and GM1 interactions, in these conditions, also do not cause the existence of microdomains rich in certain compounds.
Through the data from Table 1 it is possible to see a high ΔH value for the liposomal system (8.42 Kcal.mol-1), demonstrating once more that the geometry of the SM and GM1 molecules stabilize the DPPC constituted membrane, making the clustering among lipids more efficient.
The three ternary systems, present very similar Tc, from 40 to 41 °C (Table 1). Furthermore, these systems present enlarged peaks with high Δt1/2 values.
In Figure 4, the sharp decrease in ΔH values by the presence of the enzyme in the vesicular system becomes more evident. Its presence does not significantly influence Tc and decreases cooperativity with the increase in Δt1/2 value (Table 2).
The TNAP reconstitution in DPPC:SM:GM1 liposomes has provided around 30% incorporation of the catalytic activity (Table 2). These data demonstrate a negative effect very similar among ternary systems.
3.4 Production and biophysical characterization of quaternary liposomes and proteoliposomes with microdomains constituted by DPPC:Chol:SM:GM1
In conclusion, studies aiming to increase the complexity of the system were performed with the objective to approximate our mimetic systems to the existent microdomains in biological membranes, the so called “lipid rafts”. Thus, DPPC:Chol:SM:GM1 (7:1:1:1 molar ratio) constituted liposomes were formed in the same conditions mentioned above.
The calorimetric profile of the liposome and proteoliposomes systems is in Figure 5. With the deconvolution analysis, the presence of microdomains rich in cholesterol can be observed, characterized by the second peak centered at 42.3 °C (Figure 5-A). This Tc values is very similar to the one found for binary and ternary systems where cholesterol is present, this being another strong evidence that this transition is related to the lateral phase transition induced by the sterol. This phase segregation is even more pronounced when the enzyme is present in the system (Figure 5-B), since the second peak area centered at 42 °C becomes more resolved (Table 2), showing a higher ΔH (1.41 kcal.mol-1) value.
Figure 5.
DSC thermograms of quaternary systems (10 mg/mL). Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms were processed in excess heat capacity, Cp (kcal.K-1.mol-1) as a function of temperature (°C) of vesicles constituted by DPPC:Chol:SM:GM1 (7:1:1:1), molar ratio: (A) Liposome and (B) Proteoliposome. Dashed curves symbolize deconvolution analysis.
Regarding Tc, the main transition peak as well as the peak relating to the microdomains rich in cholesterol, for the liposome and proteoliposomes, are very similar. In a previous work in our research group, Bolean et al. [17] have compared the calorimetric profile of three different systems: DPPC-liposome, DPPC-proteoliposomes and DPPC-proteoliposomes after TNAP cleavage using PIPLC. This study shows that the alterations related to the proteoliposome system fluidity are related mainly to the GPI anchor insertion.
The quaternary liposome presents a phase transition with a high Δt1/2 value and low cooperativity and this broadening is even greater in the presence of the enzyme (Table 2). The TNAP reconstitution in such system resulted in around 25% incorporation of catalytic activity. This was one of the smallest percentage value among all the systems studied, showing that the association of the four components induces a greater negative effect in the enzyme incorporation.
4. Conclusions
In summary, with the increase of the lipid components in the membrane models, even more complex models can be formed with the presence of lipid microdomains. Due to the favorable molecular interactions between the lipid rafts components, direct insertion of the enzyme via its GPI anchor is observed but with smaller percentages of enzyme incorporation. Thus, the strategy of enzyme incorporation into liposome with complex compositions via direct insertion results in low yield of incorporation.
The already formed liquid-ordered complexes in the liposomes are presented with a greater lipid packing when compared to other regions of the membrane surface. Because of this, the posterior insertion of the enzyme into these microdomains was difficult. On the other hand, these systems are excellent for the study of changes in the enzyme catalytic activity in the presence of different lipids in model membranes. For further studies it would be necessary to form two separate vesicle systems and join them; the first proteoliposome with the enzyme inserted efficiently (Ciancaglini et al., 2006; Simão et al., 2010a) and the second with the presence of lipid microdomains. With the use of this strategy, better yields of TNAP incorporation could be achieved.
In general, the presence of TNAP in proteoliposomes caused a reduction in ΔH values when compared to the systems without the protein. Furthermore, there was a reduction in cooperativity, but changes in TC were not detected. In some cases, the presence of the enzyme resulted in an even greater segregation of the different phase transition peaks.
The relevance of the results described in this study encourages us to carry out further biophysical studies with membrane models that better mimic MVs. The results also encourage studies about the kinetic behavior of TNAP in the presence of different lipid microdomains. This can contribute to the overall understanding of the roles of lipids and their interactions with TNAP during the biomineralization process.
Research Highlights.
The formed liquid-ordered complexes in the liposomes present a greater lipid packing when compared to other regions of the membrane surface.
Smaller percentages of enzyme incorporation due to the greater lipid packing of the rafts components when compared to other regions of the membrane surface.
A pronounced decrease in ΔH when liposomes systems are compared with proteoliposomes.
Enzyme incorporation mainly influences the reduction in cooperativity but changes in TC were not detected.
The presence of the enzyme resulted in an even greater segregation of the different phase transition peaks.
These systems are excellent for the study of changes in the enzyme catalytic activity in the presence of different lipids in model membranes.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Priscila Cerviglieri for the linguistic advice. We also thank FAPESP, CAPES and CNPq for the financial support given to our laboratory. MB, AMSS and BZF received a CAPES, FAPESP and CNPq scholarship, respectively.
References
- 1.Cyboron GW, Wuthier RE. Purification and initial characterization of intrinsic membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase from chicken epiphyseal cartilage. J. Biol. Chem. 1981;256:7262–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wuthier RE, Chin JE, Hole JE, Register TC, Laura YH, Ishikawa Y. Isolation and characterization of calcium accumuling matrix vesicles from chondrocytes of chicken epiphsyeal growth plate cartilage in primary culture. J. Biol. Chem. 1985;260:15972–15979. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Curti C, Pizauro JM, Rossinholi G, Vugman I, Mello de Oliveira JA, Leone FA. Isolation and kinetic properties of an alkaline phosphatase from rat bone matrix- induced cartilage. Cell. Mol. Biol. 1986;32:55–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Say JC, Ciuffi K, Furriel RPM, Ciancaglini P, Leone FA. Alkaline phosphatase from rat osseous plates: purification and biochemical characterization of a soluble form. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1991;1074:256–62. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(91)90161-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Leone FA, Pizauro JM, Ciancaglini P. Rat osseous plate alkaline phosphatase: a search for its role in biomineralization. Trends in Comparative Biochem. Physiol. 1997;3:57–73. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ciancaglini P, Simão AMS, Camolezi FL, Millán JL, Pizauro JM. Contribution of matrix vesicles and alkaline phosphatase to ectopic bone formation. Braz J Med Biol. Res. 2006;39:603–610. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2006000500006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Millán JL. Mammalian Alkaline Phosphatase: From Biology to Applications in Medicine and Biotechnology. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; Weinheim: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mota A, Silva P, Neves D, Lemos C, Calhau C, Torres D, Martel F, Fraga H, Ribeiro L, Alçada MNMP, Pinho MJ, Negrão MR, Pedrosa R, Guerreiro S, Guimarães JT, Azevedo I, Martins MJ. Characterization of rat heart alkaline phosphatase isoenzymes and modulation of activity. Braz J Med Biol. Res. 2008;41:600–609. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2008000700009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Orimo H. The mechanism of mineralization and the role of alkaline phosphatase in health and disease. J. Nippon. Med. Sch. 2010;77:4–12. doi: 10.1272/jnms.77.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pizauro JM, Ciancaglini P, Leone FA. Characterization of the phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C-released form of rat osseous plate alkaline phosphatase and its possible significance on endochondral ossification. Molecular and Cel. Biochem. 1995;152:121–129. doi: 10.1007/BF01076074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Anderson HC, Sipe JB, Hessle L, Dhamyamraju R, Atti E, Camacho NP, Millán JL. Impaired calcification around matrix vesicles of growth plate and bone in alkaline phosphatase-deficient mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2004;164:841–847. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63172-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ciancaglini P, Yadav MC, Simão AMS, Narisawa S, Pizauro JM, Farquharson C, Hoylaerts MF, Millán JL. Kinetic Analysis of Substrate Utilization by Native and TNAP-, NPP1- or PHOSPHO1-Deficient Matrix Vesicles. J. Bone and Mineral Research. 2010;25:716–23. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.091023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simão AM, Yadav MC, Narisawa S, Bolean M, Pizauro JM, Hoylaerts MF, Ciancaglini P, Millán JL. Proteoliposomes harboring alkaline phosphatase and nucleotide pyrophosphatase as matrix vesicle biomimetics. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:7598–609. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.079830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Simão AM, Yadav MC, Ciancaglini P, Millán JL. Proteoliposomes as matrix vesicles’ biomimetics to study the initiation of skeletal mineralization. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010;43:234–41. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500008. Review. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu LN, Guo Y, Genge BR, Ishikawa Y, Wuthier RE. Transport of inorganic phosphate in primary cultures of chondrocytes isolated from the tibial growth plate of normal adolescent chickens. J Cell Biochem. 2002;86:475–89. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Eddin M. The state of lipid rafts: from model membrane to cell. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2003;32:257–83. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.142439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bolean M, Simão AMS, Favarin BZ, Millán JL, Ciancaglini P. The effect of cholesterol on the reconstitution of alkaline phosphatase into liposomes. Biophys Chem. 2010;152:74–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brown DA, London E. Structure and function of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:17221–4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R000005200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Simons K, Toomre D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;1:31–9. doi: 10.1038/35036052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Simons K, Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997;387:569–72. doi: 10.1038/42408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dietrich C, Bagatolli LA, Volovyk ZN, Thompson NL, Levi M, Jacobson K, Gratton E. Lipid Rafts Reconstituted in Model Membranes. Biophys. J. 2001;8:1417–28. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76114-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yeagle PL. Second Edition Academic Press, INC.; 2004. The membranes of cells. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kouzayha A, Besson F. GPI-alkaline phosphatase insertion into phosphatidylcholine monolayers: phase behavior and morphology changes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;333:1315–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Giocondi MC, Besson F, Dosset P, Milhiet PE, Le Grimellec C. Temperature-dependent localization of GPI-anchored intestinal alkaline phosphatase in model rafts. J Mol Recognit. 2007;20:531–7. doi: 10.1002/jmr.835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Milhiet PE, Giocondi MC, Baghdadi O, Ronzon F, Roux B, Le Grimellec C. Spontaneous insertion and partitioning of alkaline phosphatase into model lipid rafts. EMBO Rep. 2002;3:485–90. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Didier M, Lenne PE, Rigneault H, He HT. Dynamic of the plasma membrane: how to combine fluidity and order. Embo J. 2006;25:3446–57. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hartree EF. Determination of protein: a modification of the Lowry method that gives a linear photometric response. Anal. Biochem. 1972;48:422–27. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90094-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Simão AMS, Beloti MM, Cezarino RM, Rosa AL, Pizauro JM, Ciancaglini P. Membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase from ectopic mineralization and rat bone marrow cell culture. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2007;146:679–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Simão AMS, Beloti MM, Rosa AL, de Oliveira PT, Granjeiro JM, Pizauro JM, Ciancaglini P. Culture of osteogenic cells from human alveolar bone: A useful source of alkaline phosphatase. Cell. Biol. Int. 2007;31:1405–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2007.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Camolezi FL, Daghastanli KRP, Magalhães PP, Pizauro JM, Ciancaglini P. Construction of an alkaline phosphatase-liposome system: a tool for biomineralization study. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2002;34:1091–101. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00029-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li XM, Momsen MM, Smaby JM, Brockman HL, Brown RE. Cholesterol Decreases the Interfacial Elasticity and Detergent Solubility of Sphingomyelins. Biochemistry. 2001;40:5954–63. doi: 10.1021/bi002791n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Snyder B, Freire E. Compositional domain structure in phosphatidylcholine cholesterol and sphingomyelin-cholesterol bilayers. Prodc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1980;77:4055–59. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.4055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Needham D, Nunn RS. Elastic deformation and failure of lipid bilayer membranes containing cholesterol. J. Biophys. 1990;58:997–1009. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82444-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Barenholz Y. In: Physiology of Membrane Fluidity. Shinitzky M, editor. Vol. 1. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1984. pp. 131–173. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Merrill AH, Jr., Schmelz EM, Dillehay DL, Spiegel S, Shayman JA, Schroeder JJ, Riley RT, Voss KA, Wang E. Sphingolipids - The Enigmatic Lipid Class: Biochemistry, Physiology, and Pathophysiology. Toxico. and Pharmaco. 1997;142:208–225. doi: 10.1006/taap.1996.8029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fishman PH, Brady RO. Biosynthesis and function of gangliosides. Science. 1976;194:906–915. doi: 10.1126/science.185697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cestaro B, Barenholz Y, Gatt S. Hydrolysis of di- and trisialo gangliosides in micellar and liposomal dispersion by bacterial neuraminidases. Biochem. 1980;19:615–19. doi: 10.1021/bi00545a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Maggio B, Montich GG, Cumar FA. Surface topography of sulfatide and gangliosides in unilamellar vesicles of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 1988;46:137–46. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(88)90124-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sillerud LO, Schafer DE, Yu RK, Konigsberg WH. Calorimetric properties of mixtures of ganglioside GM1 and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine. J Biol Chem. 1979;254:10876–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Masserini M, Freire E. Thermotropic characterization of phosphatidylcholine vesicles containing ganglioside GM1 with homogeneous ceramide chain length. Biochem. 1986;25:1043–49. doi: 10.1021/bi00353a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Curatolo W, Small DM, Shipley GG. Phase behavior and structural characteristics of hydrated bovine brain gangliosides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1977;468:11–20. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(77)90147-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hill MW, Lester R. Mixtures of gangliosides and phosphatidylcholine in aqueous dispersions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972;282:18–30. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90307-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Reed RA, Shipley GG. Properties of ganglioside GM1 in phosphatidylcholine bilayer membranes. Biophys. J. 1996;70:1363–72. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79694-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bar LK, Barenholz Y, Thompson TE. Effect of Sphingomyelin Composition on the Phase Structure of Phosphatidylcholine–Sphingomyelin Bilayers. Biochem. 1997;36:2507–16. doi: 10.1021/bi9625004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ramstedt B, Slotte JP. Comparison of the Biophysical Properties of Racemic and d-Erythro-N-Acyl Sphingomyelins. Biophys. J. 1999;77:1498–06. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76997-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Marsh D. General features of phospholipid phase transitions. Chem. and Phys. of Lipids. 1991;57:109–20. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(91)90071-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Koynova RD, Caffrey M. Phases and phase transitions of the sphingolipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1995;1255:213–36. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(94)00202-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Epand RM. Detecting the presence of membrane domains using DSC. Biophys. Chem. 2007;126:197–200. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2006.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sesana S, Re F, Bulbarelli A, Salerno D, Cazzaniga E, Masserini M. Membrane features and activity of GPI-anchored enzymes: Alkaline phosphatase reconstituted in model membranes. Biochem. 2008;47:5433–40. doi: 10.1021/bi800005s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





