Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Jun 13;68(Pt 7):m872–m873. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812023987

catena-Poly[[[(diethyl­enetriamine-κ3 N,N′,N′′)­copper(II)]-μ-cyanido-κ2 C:N] perchlorate]

Peter W R Corfield a,*, Sylvia C Yang b
PMCID: PMC3393153  PMID: 22807721

Abstract

The structure of the title salt, {[Cu(CN)(C4H13N3)]ClO4}n, is composed of copper-containing cations and perchlor­ate anions. The CuII atom shows a square-pyramidal coordination, with equatorial positions occupied by the cyanide C atom [Cu—C = 1.990 (3) Å] and the N atoms of the diethyl­enetriamine ligand (average Cu—N = 2.033 Å), while the axial position is occupied by the N atom of a c-glide-related cyanide group. The axial Cu—N distance of 2.340 (3) Å is longer than the equatorial distances, reflecting Jahn–Teller distortion. The CuII cations are linked by the cyanide groups into infinite chains along the c-axis direction. The refinement included a three-component disordered model for the perchlorate ion. Each minor site is stabilized by hydrogen bonds to N—H donors from four surrounding cations, while one O atom of the major perchlorate site forms hydrogen bonds to three of these cations.

Related literature  

There is a growing body of literature on self-assembled polymers involving copper cyanide moieties, with many examples of one- two- and three-dimensional networks, see, for example: Roof et al. (1968); Chestnut et al. (2001); Kim et al. (2005); Lim et al. (2008). Most of these structures involve CuI atoms bridged by cyanide ligands, while a smaller number are mixed-valence compounds with cyanide linkages between CuI and CuII atoms. The present structure was prepared as a model for CN binding to copper-containing proteins (Fager & Alben, 1972), and is a rare example of a CuII cyanide-bridged linear polymer, similar to the linear polymer reported by Zhan et al. (2007). For the CN stretching frequency, see: Alben & Farrier (1972). graphic file with name e-68-0m872-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • [Cu(CN)(C4H13N3)]ClO4

  • M r = 292.18

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 6.7767 (8) Å

  • b = 21.5081 (16) Å

  • c = 8.3635 (12) Å

  • β = 118.109 (9)°

  • V = 1075.2 (2) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 5.29 mm−1

  • T = 295 K

  • 0.32 × 0.17 × 0.07 mm

Data collection  

  • Picker four-circle diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: integration (Busing & Levy, 1957a ) T min = 0.394, T max = 0.697

  • 3044 measured reflections

  • 1752 independent reflections

  • 1625 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.024

  • 6 standard reflections every 200 reflections intensity decay: none

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.031

  • wR(F 2) = 0.085

  • S = 1.09

  • 1752 reflections

  • 158 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.59 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.35 e Å−3

Data collection: locally modified program (Corfield, 1972); cell refinement: locally modified program (Corfield, 1972); data reduction: cell refinements and data reduction follow procedures in Corfield et al. (1967) and Corfield & Shore (1973); standard deviations of intensities include an ignorance factor (Busing & Levy, 1957b ) set here to 0.06; program(s) used to solve structure: local superposition program (Corfield, 1972); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023987/pk2408sup1.cif

e-68-0m872-sup1.cif (23KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023987/pk2408Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m872-Isup2.hkl (86.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å).

Cu—C8 1.990 (3)
Cu—N1 2.023 (2)
Cu—N4 2.034 (2)
Cu—N7 2.040 (3)
Cu—N8i 2.340 (3)
C8—N8 1.139 (4)

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1B⋯O3ii 0.90 2.38 3.215 (5) 154
N4—H4⋯O3iii 0.91 2.42 3.214 (5) 145
N7—H7A⋯O3i 0.90 2.23 3.092 (4) 161
N1—H1A⋯O4′ 0.90 2.17 2.771 (17) 124
N1—H1B⋯O3′ii 0.90 2.04 2.913 (15) 164
N4—H4⋯O1′iii 0.91 2.30 3.139 (19) 154
N7—H7A⋯O3′i 0.90 2.14 3.040 (16) 173
N1—H1A⋯O1′′ 0.90 2.21 3.06 (4) 156
N1—H1B⋯O4′′ii 0.90 2.51 3.21 (3) 135
N4—H4⋯O3′′iii 0.91 2.12 2.99 (3) 160
N7—H7A⋯O3′′i 0.90 2.45 3.24 (3) 147
N7—H7B⋯O4′′ 0.90 2.50 3.04 (3) 119

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge gratefully the provision of a crystalline sample by James O. Alben and N. J. Farrier, as well as partial support from the National Science Foundation through equipment grant GP8534 awarded to the Ohio State University, where the experimental work was carried out.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title compound, [Cu(dien)CN]ClO4, (Fig. 1), was originally prepared as a simple model for CN- binding to copper-containing proteins, with the expectation that structural data would supplement information from infra-red studies on cyanide binding to the proteins. (Fager and Alben, 1972) The structure is reported now in light of current interest in cyanide-bridged copper polymers.

The crystal structure consists of cyanidodiethylenetriaminecopper(II) cations and perchlorate anions. The cyanide groups link c-glide related copper atoms to form infinite chains along the c axis, as shown in Fig. 2. The coordination of the copper atoms is square pyramidal, with the terdentate diethylenetriamine ligand and the carbon atom of the cyanide group in equatorial positions, and the nitrogen atom of a symmetry-related cyanide group in the axial position.

Atom O4 of the perchlorate group would occupy the sixth coordination site of the CuII atom if the Cu—O4 distance of 2.956 (4) Å represented a chemical bond, making the copper atom octahedrally coordinated. Perchlorate anions rarely coordinate, however, and we prefer the square pyramidal designation, in view of the long Cu—O4 distance, and the displacement of the copper atom by 0.237 (1) Å towards the axial nitrogen atom and away from the perchlorate O4 atom. Furthermore, the O4 atom has similar Ueq values to the other perchlorate oxygen atoms, and is disordered in the same way, whereas bonding to the Cu atom would be expected to localize the atom O4.

The Cu—C—N angle at the cyanide carbon atom is close to linear, at 175.9 (3)°, but the C—N—Cu angle at the bridging cyanide nitrogen atom is 146.5 (2)°, significantly different from 180°. The C—N bond length is 1.139 (4) Å, similar to the terminal bond length of 1.129 Å in K3Cu(CN)4, (Roof et al., 1968).

In the diethylenetriamine ligand, the carbon atoms in each chelate ring lie on opposite sides of the corresponding CuN2 plane. The Cu—N1—C2—C3—N4 chelate ring has the λ conformation, with torsional angle N1—C2—C3—N4 equal to -51.9 (3) °, while the other chelate ring has the δ conformation, with the N4—C5—C6—N7 torsional angle equal to +51.9 (3) °.

Two minor alternative orientations for the perchlorate anion were refined, related to the major orientation by rotation about the Cl—O2 bond, by 34° in one direction, and 25° in the other. (Fig. 3) Each minor site is stabilized by hydrogen bonds to N—H donors from four surrounding cations, while atom O3 of the major perchlorate site forms hydrogen bonds to three of these cations.

Experimental

The compound was prepared by addition of stoichiometric amounts of diethylenetriamine and potassium cyanide to a solution of copper(II) perchlorate. Calculated elemental analysis, based upon C5H13ClCuN4O4: C, 20.55%; H, 4.48%; N, 19.18%. Found: C, 20.60, 20.66%; H, 4.98, 4.58%; N, 19.02%. The CN stretching frequency was 2141.4 cm-1 (Alben and Farrier, 1972).

Refinement

All 13 hydrogen atoms of the diethylenetriamine ligand were found unambiguously in a difference Fourier map, and were initially refined freely. In the final refinements, hydrogen atoms were constrained to idealized positions by SHELXL97.

The assignment of C and N atoms in the cyanide group was checked early in the analysis by carrying out a least-squares refinement with the N and C atoms of the cyanide group reversed. The weighted R factor increased significantly from 0.061 to 0.091. There is no evidence of disorder between the C and N atoms of the cyanide group.

Perchlorate ion disorder: Refinement of a single anisotropic perchlorate group converged successfully with wR2=0.1091 for all 1752 reflections. The thermal parameters indicated large librations about the Cl—O2 bond however, and difference Fourier maps indicated two minor alternative orientations for the perchlorate group.

After initial stringent constraints, the three orientations were refined freely, with common Cl and O2 atoms. The main orientation (O1—O4) was refined anisotropically, with an occupancy fixed at 70%. The two minor orientations (O1'-O4') and (O1''-O4'') were given occupancy factors of 18% and 12% respectively, based upon heights found in difference Fourier maps. U values for O1' and O1'', O3' and O3'', and O4' and O4'' were constrained to be equal. This model reduced wR2 significantly from 0.1091 to 0.0847, with the addition of 22 new parameters.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the [Cu(dien)CN] cation and the major component of the perchlorate anion, with ellipsoids at the 50% level. Atoms C8' and N8' are C8 and N8 at x, 1/2-y, 1/2+z.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Packing of [Cu(dien)CN]ClO4, viewed down the a axis. The darkened bonds show the Cu-CN-Cu chains along the c axis. Only the major perchlorate component is shown.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The disordered perchlorate anion, with ellipsoids drawn at the 25% probability level.

Crystal data

[Cu(CN)(C4H13N3)]ClO4 F(000) = 596
Mr = 292.18 Dx = 1.806 Mg m3Dm = 1.805 Mg m3Dm measured by flotation in chloroform/bromoform mixtures
Monoclinic, P21/c Melting point: 471(2) K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å
a = 6.7767 (8) Å Cell parameters from 25 reflections
b = 21.5081 (16) Å θ = 4–52°
c = 8.3635 (12) Å µ = 5.29 mm1
β = 118.109 (9)° T = 295 K
V = 1075.2 (2) Å3 Plate, dark blue
Z = 4 0.32 × 0.17 × 0.07 mm

Data collection

Picker four-circle diffractometer 1625 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube Rint = 0.024
Oriented graphite 200 reflection monochromator θmax = 63.3°, θmin = 4.1°
θ/2θ scans h = −7→6
Absorption correction: integration (Busing & Levy, 1957a) k = 0→24
Tmin = 0.394, Tmax = 0.697 l = 0→9
3044 measured reflections 6 standard reflections every 200 reflections
1752 independent reflections intensity decay: none

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: real-space vector search
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.085 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.010P)2 + 1.140P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1752 reflections Δρmax = 0.59 e Å3
158 parameters Δρmin = −0.35 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: heavy-atom method Extinction coefficient: 0.0010 (2)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against all reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on all data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
Cu 0.15547 (7) 0.322023 (18) 0.63505 (5) 0.03271 (18)
N1 −0.0930 (4) 0.38484 (12) 0.5101 (3) 0.0426 (6)
H1A −0.0788 0.4034 0.4197 0.051*
H1B −0.2264 0.3655 0.4620 0.051*
C2 −0.0818 (6) 0.43180 (15) 0.6424 (5) 0.0499 (8)
H2A −0.1495 0.4157 0.7135 0.075*
H2B −0.1626 0.4689 0.5799 0.075*
C3 0.1595 (5) 0.44708 (14) 0.7639 (4) 0.0433 (7)
H3A 0.2220 0.4689 0.6965 0.065*
H3B 0.1743 0.4734 0.8632 0.065*
N4 0.2770 (4) 0.38751 (10) 0.8338 (3) 0.0321 (5)
H4 0.2433 0.3746 0.9217 0.038*
C5 0.5219 (5) 0.38908 (15) 0.9155 (4) 0.0410 (7)
H5A 0.5851 0.4108 1.0307 0.061*
H5B 0.5674 0.4104 0.8360 0.061*
C6 0.6010 (6) 0.32285 (15) 0.9427 (5) 0.0481 (8)
H6A 0.7601 0.3214 0.9809 0.072*
H6B 0.5750 0.3034 1.0358 0.072*
N7 0.4756 (4) 0.28942 (12) 0.7688 (4) 0.0430 (6)
H7A 0.4741 0.2484 0.7900 0.052*
H7B 0.5436 0.2949 0.6997 0.052*
C8 0.0609 (5) 0.26492 (13) 0.4243 (4) 0.0344 (6)
N8 0.0196 (4) 0.23248 (12) 0.3050 (3) 0.0428 (6)
Cl 0.30284 (12) 0.40553 (3) 0.28806 (10) 0.0381 (2)
O2 0.4055 (5) 0.45800 (12) 0.2534 (4) 0.0653 (7)
O1 0.0662 (8) 0.4083 (3) 0.1838 (8) 0.0782 (19) 0.70
O3 0.3915 (7) 0.35240 (17) 0.2420 (6) 0.0528 (10) 0.70
O4 0.3631 (8) 0.4055 (2) 0.4760 (6) 0.0593 (12) 0.70
O1' 0.109 (3) 0.3883 (9) 0.125 (3) 0.069 (5)* 0.18
O3' 0.440 (3) 0.3468 (7) 0.349 (2) 0.053 (3)* 0.18
O4' 0.238 (3) 0.4161 (8) 0.419 (2) 0.056 (4)* 0.18
O1'' 0.077 (8) 0.421 (2) 0.243 (5) 0.069 (5)* 0.12
O3'' 0.286 (4) 0.3518 (13) 0.183 (4) 0.053 (3)* 0.12
O4'' 0.413 (5) 0.3815 (12) 0.474 (4) 0.056 (4)* 0.12

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu 0.0355 (3) 0.0299 (3) 0.0297 (3) 0.00199 (16) 0.0128 (2) −0.00357 (15)
N1 0.0402 (14) 0.0407 (14) 0.0389 (14) 0.0040 (11) 0.0121 (12) −0.0018 (11)
C2 0.0497 (19) 0.0416 (17) 0.052 (2) 0.0151 (15) 0.0190 (16) −0.0018 (15)
C3 0.0522 (19) 0.0309 (15) 0.0435 (17) 0.0043 (14) 0.0199 (15) −0.0045 (13)
N4 0.0355 (13) 0.0314 (12) 0.0303 (12) −0.0007 (10) 0.0163 (10) −0.0003 (10)
C5 0.0367 (16) 0.0461 (17) 0.0388 (17) −0.0075 (13) 0.0167 (14) −0.0099 (14)
C6 0.0366 (17) 0.055 (2) 0.0430 (19) 0.0044 (14) 0.0104 (15) −0.0033 (14)
N7 0.0421 (14) 0.0380 (14) 0.0494 (15) 0.0046 (11) 0.0218 (12) −0.0046 (12)
C8 0.0376 (16) 0.0335 (15) 0.0346 (16) 0.0034 (12) 0.0191 (13) 0.0034 (13)
N8 0.0528 (16) 0.0386 (14) 0.0365 (14) 0.0052 (12) 0.0206 (12) −0.0040 (12)
Cl 0.0391 (4) 0.0397 (4) 0.0381 (4) −0.0016 (3) 0.0203 (3) −0.0039 (3)
O2 0.0807 (18) 0.0531 (15) 0.0723 (17) −0.0186 (13) 0.0446 (15) 0.0014 (13)
O1 0.030 (2) 0.077 (4) 0.095 (5) 0.003 (2) 0.003 (3) −0.005 (4)
O3 0.068 (3) 0.0388 (19) 0.064 (3) 0.005 (2) 0.041 (3) −0.0087 (19)
O4 0.069 (3) 0.081 (3) 0.0335 (19) −0.017 (3) 0.029 (2) −0.010 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Cu—C8 1.990 (3) C5—H5B 0.9700
Cu—N1 2.023 (2) C6—N7 1.480 (4)
Cu—N4 2.034 (2) C6—H6A 0.9700
Cu—N7 2.040 (3) C6—H6B 0.9700
Cu—N8i 2.340 (3) N7—H7A 0.9000
N1—C2 1.474 (4) N7—H7B 0.9000
N1—H1A 0.9000 C8—N8 1.139 (4)
N1—H1B 0.9000 N8—Cuii 2.340 (3)
C2—C3 1.500 (5) Cl—O1 1.420 (5)
C2—H2A 0.9700 Cl—O2 1.425 (2)
C2—H2B 0.9700 Cl—O3 1.426 (4)
C3—N4 1.476 (4) Cl—O4 1.426 (4)
C3—H3A 0.9700 Cl—O1' 1.43 (2)
C3—H3B 0.9700 Cl—O3' 1.507 (15)
N4—C5 1.467 (4) Cl—O4' 1.376 (16)
N4—H4 0.9100 Cl—O1'' 1.44 (5)
C5—C6 1.501 (4) Cl—O3'' 1.42 (3)
C5—H5A 0.9700 Cl—O4'' 1.46 (3)
C8—Cu—N1 96.45 (11) C6—C5—H5A 110.3
C8—Cu—N4 171.38 (11) N4—C5—H5B 110.3
N1—Cu—N4 82.98 (10) C6—C5—H5B 110.3
C8—Cu—N7 95.09 (11) H5A—C5—H5B 108.6
N1—Cu—N7 157.48 (11) N7—C6—C5 108.3 (3)
N4—Cu—N7 82.73 (10) N7—C6—H6A 110.0
C8—Cu—N8i 100.04 (10) C5—C6—H6A 110.0
N1—Cu—N8i 100.27 (11) N7—C6—H6B 110.0
N4—Cu—N8i 88.51 (9) C5—C6—H6B 110.0
N7—Cu—N8i 96.66 (10) H6A—C6—H6B 108.4
C2—N1—Cu 109.50 (19) C6—N7—Cu 109.98 (19)
C2—N1—H1A 109.8 C6—N7—H7A 109.7
Cu—N1—H1A 109.8 Cu—N7—H7A 109.7
C2—N1—H1B 109.8 C6—N7—H7B 109.7
Cu—N1—H1B 109.8 Cu—N7—H7B 109.7
H1A—N1—H1B 108.2 H7A—N7—H7B 108.2
N1—C2—C3 108.2 (3) N8—C8—Cu 175.9 (3)
N1—C2—H2A 110.1 C8—N8—Cuii 146.5 (2)
C3—C2—H2A 110.1 O1—Cl—O2 111.1 (3)
N1—C2—H2B 110.1 O1—Cl—O3 111.4 (3)
C3—C2—H2B 110.1 O1—Cl—O4 109.3 (3)
H2A—C2—H2B 108.4 O2—Cl—O3 105.7 (2)
N4—C3—C2 106.9 (2) O2—Cl—O4 108.1 (2)
N4—C3—H3A 110.3 O3—Cl—O4 111.1 (3)
C2—C3—H3A 110.3 O1'—Cl—O2 109.3 (8)
N4—C3—H3B 110.3 O1'—Cl—O3' 104.4 (10)
C2—C3—H3B 110.3 O1'—Cl—O4' 107.9 (11)
H3A—C3—H3B 108.6 O2—Cl—O3' 116.7 (6)
C5—N4—C3 116.4 (2) O2—Cl—O4' 113.6 (7)
C5—N4—Cu 109.27 (17) O3'—Cl—O4' 104.3 (9)
C3—N4—Cu 110.01 (18) O1''—Cl—O2 108.8 (18)
C5—N4—H4 106.9 O1''—Cl—O3'' 105.5 (17)
C3—N4—H4 106.9 O1''—Cl—O4'' 108 (2)
Cu—N4—H4 106.9 O2—Cl—O3'' 114.8 (11)
N4—C5—C6 107.1 (2) O2—Cl—O4'' 116.1 (12)
N4—C5—H5A 110.3 O3''—Cl—O4'' 102.8 (15)
N1—C2—C3—N4 −51.9 (3) N4—C5—C6—N7 51.9 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1B···O3iii 0.90 2.38 3.215 (5) 154
N4—H4···O3iv 0.91 2.42 3.214 (5) 145
N7—H7A···O3i 0.90 2.23 3.092 (4) 161
N1—H1A···O4′ 0.90 2.17 2.771 (17) 124
N1—H1B···O3′iii 0.90 2.04 2.913 (15) 164
N4—H4···O1′iv 0.91 2.30 3.139 (19) 154
N7—H7A···O3′i 0.90 2.14 3.040 (16) 173
N1—H1A···O1′′ 0.90 2.21 3.06 (4) 156
N1—H1B···O4′′iii 0.90 2.51 3.21 (3) 135
N4—H4···O3′′iv 0.91 2.12 2.99 (3) 160
N7—H7A···O3′′i 0.90 2.45 3.24 (3) 147
N7—H7B···O4′′ 0.90 2.50 3.04 (3) 119

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x−1, y, z; (iv) x, y, z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: PK2408).

References

  1. Alben, J. O. & Farrier, N. (1972). Personal communication.
  2. Busing, W. R. & Levy, H. A. (1957a). Acta Cryst. 10, 180–182.
  3. Busing, W. R. & Levy, H. A. (1957b). J. Chem. Phys. 26, 563–568.
  4. Chestnut, D. J., Plewak, D. & Zubieta, J. (2001). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 2567–2580.
  5. Corfield, P. W. R. (1972). Local versions of standard programs, written at Ohio State University.
  6. Corfield, P. W. R., Doedens, R. J. & Ibers, J. A. (1967). Inorg. Chem. 6, 197–204.
  7. Corfield, P. W. R. & Shore, S. G. (1973). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95, 1480–1487.
  8. Fager, L. Y. & Alben, J. O. (1972). Biochemistry, 11, 4786–4792. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Johnson, C. K. (1976). ORTEPII Report ORNL-5138. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.
  10. Kim, D., Koo, J., Hong, C. S., Oh, S. & Do, Y. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 4383–4390. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Lim, M. J., Murray, C. A., Tronic, T. A., deKrafft, K. E., Ley, A. N., de Butts, J. C., Pike, R. D., Lu, H. & Patterson, H. H. (2008). Inorg. Chem. 47, 6931–6947. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Roof, R. B., Larson, A. C. & Cromer, D. T. (1968). Acta Cryst. B24, 269–273.
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Zhan, S.-Z., Li, W., Wang, J.-G., Liang, A.-Q. & Deng, Y.-F. (2007). J. Organomet. Chem. 692, 3568–3573.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023987/pk2408sup1.cif

e-68-0m872-sup1.cif (23KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812023987/pk2408Isup2.hkl

e-68-0m872-Isup2.hkl (86.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES