Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Jun 30;68(Pt 7):o2285. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812028607

2,2′-Sulfonyl­dipyrazine 4-oxide

Ai-Min Li a, Ya Zhang a, Zhi-Wei Wang a, Chong-Qing Wan a,*
PMCID: PMC3394064  PMID: 22798929

Abstract

In the title compound, C8H6N4O3S, the dihedral angle between the pyrazine rings is 85.04 (1)°. In the crystal, mol­ecules are arranged along the a axis and are linked by C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and pyrazine–pyrazine π–π inter­actions [centroid–centroid distance = 3.800 (1) Å, forming an infinite chain array. The chains are connected by C—H⋯O(oxide) hydrogen bonds into layers lying parallel to the ab plane. Along the c axis, the layers are stacked and linked through C—H⋯O(sulfon­yl) inter­actions, forming a three-dimensional network.

Related literature  

For metal complexes with 2,2′-sulfonyl­dipyrazine, see: Wan & Mak (2011). For crystal structures of pyridyl-based N-oxide and their metal complexes, see: Jia et al. (2008).graphic file with name e-68-o2285-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C8H6N4O3S

  • M r = 238.23

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.6860 (16) Å

  • b = 15.841 (3) Å

  • c = 9.0624 (14) Å

  • β = 117.813 (13)°

  • V = 975.9 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.33 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.45 × 0.30 × 0.25 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007) T min = 0.688, T max = 1.000

  • 6606 measured reflections

  • 2429 independent reflections

  • 1586 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.058

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.063

  • wR(F 2) = 0.203

  • S = 1.07

  • 2429 reflections

  • 145 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.85 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812028607/zq2171sup1.cif

e-68-o2285-sup1.cif (15.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812028607/zq2171Isup2.hkl

e-68-o2285-Isup2.hkl (119.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C2—H2A⋯O1i 0.93 2.32 3.130 (5) 146
C3—H3A⋯O3ii 0.93 2.56 3.419 (4) 153
C7—H7A⋯N1iii 0.93 2.57 3.449 (3) 157

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (grant No. 2122011) and the Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KM201210028018) for financial support.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Pyridyl based sulfonyl derivatives were widely used in supramolecular assemblies of transition metal complexes (Wan & Mak, 2011). Pyridyl based N-oxide derivatives have also been demonstrated as versatile building blocks to construct supramolecular architectures of various metal complexes (Jia et al., 2008). In the present context, we report the structure of the title compound, a new N-oxide compound derived from 2,2'-sulfonyldipyrazine.

In the title compound, the value of the C1(sp2)—S1—C5(sp2) angle is 103.92 (1)° with two attached pyrazinyl rings exhibiting a dihedral angle of 85.04 (1)°, as shown in Fig. 1. The angular-shaped molecules are arranged along the a axis. As shown in Fig. 2, two adjacent molecules arranged with an inversion center are interconnected through C7—H7A···N1iii and π···π interactions (Cg···Cgiii = 3.800 (1) Å, Cg represents the C5-N3-C6-C7-N4-C8 ring; symmetry code: iii = 2 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z). The dimers are further interconnected through π···π interactions between Cg and Cgiv [Cg···Cgiv = 4.174 (2) Å, the distance between the closest ring atom and one Cg is 3.597 (2) Å; symmetry code = 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z]. The formed chains are further connected through C3—H3A···O3ii(oxynitride) hydrogen bonds to form a layer almost parallel to the ab plane (symmetry code: ii = 2 - x, - y, 1 - z). Along the c axis, the formed layers are stacked and interconnected through C2—H2A···O1i(sulfonyl) interactions to form a three-dimensional framework (Fig. 3, Table 1; symmetry code: i = x, -y + 1/2, z + 1/2).

Experimental

The title compound was obtained as a serendipitous byproduct as the 2,2'-dipyrazine sulfide (0.022 g, 0.1 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of methanol 2 ml and acetonitrile 2 ml to react with Mn(ClO4)2.6H2O (0.036 g, 0.1 mmol) with constantly stirring at room temperature. After three hours, the clear solution was filtrated and kept in air for about one week to yield colourless block crystals (7 mg, 29% yield). We got the the title compound as a matter of the oxidability by perchlorate acid from Mn(ClO4)2.6H2O.

Refinement

All hydrogen positions were calculated after each cycle of refinement using a riding model with C—H = 0.93 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). The highest peak (0.8 e.Å-3) in the difference Fourier map is located at 1.1 Å from atom N4. The refinement of a model including one H atom at this position led to lower R1 and wR2 values but it is chemically meaningless since there is no counter ion in the crystal structure. A positional disorder of the oxo O atom (partially on atoms O4 and O2) is surely the best solution but in this case too many restraints had to be used in the final refinements to get an acceptable model (with an site-occupancy ratio greater than 0.9:0.1).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The atom-numbering scheme of the title complex. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 35% probability level and H atoms are shown as sticks of arbitrary radii.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The hydrogen-bonding (C—H···N) and π···π stacking interactions between parallel chains along the a axis, which are respectively shown as thin red-dashed lines and thick blue-dashed lines (symmetry codes: i = - x + 2, - y + 1, - z + 1; ii = x + 1, y, z).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Three-dimensional structure of the title molecule viewed down the a direction. The red dashed lines represent hydrogen-bonding interactions.

Crystal data

C8H6N4O3S F(000) = 488
Mr = 238.23 Dx = 1.621 Mg m3Dm = 1.621 Mg m3Dm measured by not measured
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 365 reflections
a = 7.6860 (16) Å θ = 2.6–28.4°
b = 15.841 (3) Å µ = 0.33 mm1
c = 9.0624 (14) Å T = 296 K
β = 117.813 (13)° Needle-like, colourless
V = 975.9 (3) Å3 0.45 × 0.30 × 0.25 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer 2429 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1586 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.058
ω scans θmax = 28.4°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007) h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.688, Tmax = 1.000 k = −21→11
6606 measured reflections l = −12→11

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.063 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.203 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0981P)2 + 0.5688P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2429 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
145 parameters Δρmax = 0.85 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.46 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 0.50844 (11) 0.33579 (5) 0.25247 (12) 0.0436 (3)
N1 0.8484 (4) 0.27476 (19) 0.2912 (4) 0.0531 (8)
N2 0.8080 (4) 0.12101 (18) 0.4199 (4) 0.0520 (8)
N3 0.6907 (4) 0.4321 (2) 0.5196 (4) 0.0540 (8)
N4 0.7631 (6) 0.5635 (2) 0.3499 (6) 0.0699 (10)
O1 0.4354 (3) 0.35188 (18) 0.0788 (3) 0.0581 (7)
O2 0.3755 (4) 0.31172 (17) 0.3141 (4) 0.0627 (8)
O3 0.7852 (6) 0.0494 (2) 0.4742 (6) 0.0996 (13)
C1 0.6949 (4) 0.25624 (19) 0.3152 (4) 0.0403 (7)
C2 0.6667 (5) 0.1820 (2) 0.3776 (5) 0.0494 (9)
H2A 0.5552 0.1732 0.3910 0.059*
C3 0.9681 (5) 0.1382 (2) 0.4026 (5) 0.0535 (9)
H3A 1.0685 0.0985 0.4351 0.064*
C4 0.9844 (5) 0.2134 (2) 0.3375 (6) 0.0582 (10)
H4A 1.0959 0.2229 0.3244 0.070*
C5 0.6391 (4) 0.4281 (2) 0.3598 (4) 0.0416 (8)
C6 0.7790 (6) 0.5037 (3) 0.5944 (6) 0.0627 (11)
H6A 0.8189 0.5105 0.7076 0.075*
C7 0.8125 (6) 0.5678 (3) 0.5086 (7) 0.0677 (13)
H7A 0.8734 0.6167 0.5664 0.081*
C8 0.6737 (5) 0.4914 (2) 0.2717 (5) 0.0561 (9)
H8A 0.6355 0.4843 0.1588 0.067*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.0286 (4) 0.0384 (4) 0.0661 (6) −0.0005 (3) 0.0238 (4) −0.0064 (4)
N1 0.0336 (13) 0.0392 (15) 0.090 (2) −0.0016 (11) 0.0314 (14) 0.0025 (14)
N2 0.0566 (17) 0.0332 (14) 0.073 (2) 0.0047 (13) 0.0357 (16) 0.0039 (14)
N3 0.0531 (17) 0.0451 (17) 0.062 (2) 0.0018 (13) 0.0250 (15) −0.0052 (14)
N4 0.069 (2) 0.0405 (17) 0.110 (3) −0.0067 (16) 0.050 (2) −0.0055 (19)
O1 0.0378 (12) 0.0647 (17) 0.0632 (17) 0.0072 (11) 0.0165 (11) −0.0084 (13)
O2 0.0493 (14) 0.0492 (15) 0.109 (2) −0.0070 (12) 0.0529 (15) −0.0115 (14)
O3 0.117 (3) 0.0558 (19) 0.159 (4) 0.020 (2) 0.092 (3) 0.033 (2)
C1 0.0313 (14) 0.0330 (15) 0.0563 (19) −0.0009 (12) 0.0203 (13) −0.0058 (14)
C2 0.0477 (18) 0.0394 (17) 0.074 (2) 0.0008 (14) 0.0395 (18) −0.0013 (16)
C3 0.0350 (16) 0.0456 (19) 0.072 (2) 0.0044 (14) 0.0187 (16) −0.0014 (18)
C4 0.0315 (16) 0.0463 (19) 0.099 (3) 0.0001 (14) 0.0318 (18) 0.0007 (19)
C5 0.0311 (14) 0.0333 (15) 0.062 (2) 0.0036 (12) 0.0230 (14) −0.0017 (14)
C6 0.055 (2) 0.056 (2) 0.068 (3) 0.0036 (18) 0.0203 (19) −0.017 (2)
C7 0.047 (2) 0.041 (2) 0.115 (4) −0.0084 (16) 0.038 (2) −0.024 (2)
C8 0.055 (2) 0.045 (2) 0.072 (3) 0.0007 (16) 0.0323 (19) −0.0001 (18)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

S1—O1 1.425 (3) N4—C8 1.351 (5)
S1—O2 1.426 (3) C1—C2 1.366 (5)
S1—C5 1.784 (3) C2—H2A 0.9300
S1—C1 1.790 (3) C3—C4 1.362 (6)
N1—C1 1.328 (4) C3—H3A 0.9300
N1—C4 1.343 (4) C4—H4A 0.9300
N2—O3 1.281 (4) C5—C8 1.382 (5)
N2—C3 1.339 (5) C6—C7 1.374 (7)
N2—C2 1.368 (4) C6—H6A 0.9300
N3—C5 1.312 (5) C7—H7A 0.9300
N3—C6 1.333 (5) C8—H8A 0.9300
N4—C7 1.306 (6)
O1—S1—O2 119.66 (17) N2—C3—C4 120.2 (3)
O1—S1—C5 106.68 (17) N2—C3—H3A 119.9
O2—S1—C5 109.23 (16) C4—C3—H3A 119.9
O1—S1—C1 108.72 (16) N1—C4—C3 123.6 (3)
O2—S1—C1 107.53 (17) N1—C4—H4A 118.2
C5—S1—C1 103.92 (14) C3—C4—H4A 118.2
C1—N1—C4 114.3 (3) N3—C5—C8 124.2 (3)
O3—N2—C3 121.5 (3) N3—C5—S1 116.4 (3)
O3—N2—C2 120.0 (3) C8—C5—S1 119.4 (3)
C3—N2—C2 118.5 (3) N3—C6—C7 121.7 (4)
C5—N3—C6 114.9 (4) N3—C6—H6A 119.1
C7—N4—C8 115.9 (4) C7—C6—H6A 119.1
N1—C1—C2 125.6 (3) N4—C7—C6 123.4 (4)
N1—C1—S1 115.7 (2) N4—C7—H7A 118.3
C2—C1—S1 118.6 (2) C6—C7—H7A 118.3
C1—C2—N2 117.7 (3) N4—C8—C5 119.8 (4)
C1—C2—H2A 121.1 N4—C8—H8A 120.1
N2—C2—H2A 121.1 C5—C8—H8A 120.1
C4—N1—C1—C2 −1.3 (5) N2—C3—C4—N1 1.6 (7)
C4—N1—C1—S1 −179.2 (3) C6—N3—C5—C8 1.0 (5)
O1—S1—C1—N1 59.3 (3) C6—N3—C5—S1 −176.7 (3)
O2—S1—C1—N1 −169.8 (3) O1—S1—C5—N3 169.1 (2)
C5—S1—C1—N1 −54.1 (3) O2—S1—C5—N3 38.4 (3)
O1—S1—C1—C2 −118.8 (3) C1—S1—C5—N3 −76.1 (3)
O2—S1—C1—C2 12.1 (3) O1—S1—C5—C8 −8.7 (3)
C5—S1—C1—C2 127.8 (3) O2—S1—C5—C8 −139.4 (3)
N1—C1—C2—N2 0.1 (6) C1—S1—C5—C8 106.1 (3)
S1—C1—C2—N2 178.0 (3) C5—N3—C6—C7 −0.1 (5)
O3—N2—C2—C1 −177.9 (4) C8—N4—C7—C6 0.5 (6)
C3—N2—C2—C1 1.9 (5) N3—C6—C7—N4 −0.6 (6)
O3—N2—C3—C4 177.1 (4) C7—N4—C8—C5 0.3 (6)
C2—N2—C3—C4 −2.8 (6) N3—C5—C8—N4 −1.1 (5)
C1—N1—C4—C3 0.4 (6) S1—C5—C8—N4 176.5 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C2—H2A···O1i 0.93 2.32 3.130 (5) 146
C3—H3A···O3ii 0.93 2.56 3.419 (4) 153
C7—H7A···N1iii 0.93 2.57 3.449 (3) 157

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) −x+2, −y, −z+1; (iii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: ZQ2171).

References

  1. Bruker (2007). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Jia, J. H., Blake, A. J., Champness, N. R., Hubberstey, P., Wilson, C. & Schröder, M. (2008). Inorg. Chem. 47, 8652–8664. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Wan, C. Q. & Mak, T. C. W. (2011). New J. Chem. 35, 319–327.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812028607/zq2171sup1.cif

e-68-o2285-sup1.cif (15.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812028607/zq2171Isup2.hkl

e-68-o2285-Isup2.hkl (119.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES