Introduction
Scrapie is a naturally occurring disease of domestic and wild (mouflon) sheep and goats. The disease was first reported in sheep over 250 y ago and in Canada in 1938 (1). While the precise cause of the disease is still the subject of significant research, abnormal prion protein is associated with the presence of disease (2,3). Pregnancy appears to trigger the migration of abnormal prion protein to the reproductive tract (4,5,6,7). Birthing fluids and tissues, such as placenta, from infected females contain large quantities of the scrapie agent (8,4). Healthy animals become infected by eating or licking contaminated materials in the lambing or kidding environment. Newborn lambs and kids sharing the same contaminated environment (lambing pen) are extremely susceptible to infection (4,8). Adult females sharing the same environment are also at risk but may require repeated exposure to a contaminated environment before becoming infected (4,7). Although scrapie is an infectious disease, it is not highly contagious. In contrast to some diseases, such as foot-and-mouth disease, casual contact between animals and inanimate objects, such as vehicle tires, people, or the wind, are not known to transmit scrapie (4,5,9,10,11).
Several separate research studies on the potential of scrapie transmission by embryos have produced conflicting results (12,13,14,15). At present, there is inadequate information to negate embryo transfer as a transmission risk or to provide advice on appropriate measures to mitigate this risk. There is no evidence to date that implicates semen in the transmission of scrapie.
Clinical signs of scrapie rarely develop before the age of 18 mo and are highly variable. The majority of cases are diagnosed in animals 2 to 5 y of age. As many animals do not show overt clinical signs until late in the course of the disease, significant transmission of the scrapie agent occurs prior to any visible indications of a disease problem (16,17,18,19,20,21).
The predominant nervous signs of scrapie are as follows (22):
a change in mental status (apprehension, teeth grinding, aggression);
altered sensation (pruritus or itchiness, loss of wool, excoriation and inflammation of the skin, nibble reflex, excessive licking);
tremors; and
abnormal posture and locomotion (ataxia, “bunny hopping,” recumbency).
Scrapie is a reportable disease in Canada. Anyone suspecting this disease must report this suspicion to a district veterinarian of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Diseases that may be confused with scrapie include heavy infestations of ectoparasites (lice & mites), photosensitization, pregnancy toxemia, listeriosis, rabies, maedi-visna, and poisonings (organophosphates and copper).
Role of genetics
Genetic makeup has been determined to be a significant factor in an animal's susceptibility to infection with scrapie. A gene that regulates the incubation period for scrapie (the amount of time to develop the disease) has been identified (23,24,25,26,27,28). The presence of specific amino acids at certain sites on the gene confer scrapie susceptibility. At the other end of the spectrum, the presence of other amino acids at the same sites on the gene appear to confer scrapie resistance. It is still not known whether animals with these latter genotypes do not become infected with the scrapie agent or whether they are merely protected from developing the clinical signs of scrapie (29,30).
The specific amino acids and the sites that appear to confer susceptibility verus resistance vary with the strain of scrapie agent involved and the breed of sheep (31). While the genetic profile for all sheep breeds present in North America has not been determined, all positive cases of scrapie that have been genotyped in North America have been determined to be homozygotes for glutamine (QQ) at codon 71 (Balachrandan A, Sutton D, personal communications).
A blood test (32,33,34,35) is commercially available in Canada to determine the genetic profile of an animal. It is possible to use genetic profile as a farm management tool. Selection of breeding rams may include examination of their genetic profile by blood test. Recent science indicates that the genotype of the fetus may influence the migration and accumulation of abnormal prion in the placenta of an infected ewe (36). A 171 QQ infected ewe carrying a 171 QQ fetus would result in the accumulation of large quantities of abnormal prion, which is then shed during birth or abortion. Theoretically, in a fetus with a genotype 171 QR or 171 RR, the abnormal prion does not accumulate in the placenta and associated fluids. This would mean that use of a 171 RR ram could prevent the shedding of abnormal prion at lambing, even from infected ewes. Heavy promotion of the use of 171 RR rams across Canada might be effective in minimizing the spread of scrapie, but it could result in a significant change in the genotypic profile of sheep in Canada; there might be impacts on secondary characteristics, such as carcass quality, or the unveiling of previously unidentified congenital problems (36).
Detection of infected animals
Routine methods of preventing a disease that is transmitted between animals are vaccination, quarantine, testing, and removal. Since the scrapie agent elicits no detectable immune response in the host, vaccinations and serological testing for presence of antibodies have not been possible to date. At this time, there is no treatment to cure an animal that has contracted the disease.
Scrapie is currently diagnosed by examining brain and other tissues (4,7,37,38,39,40,41,42,43). Lymphoid follicles on the third eyelid (nictitating membrane) may be harvested for testing. However, the abnormal prion protein is not found in this tissue in all scrapie agent-infected sheep. This possibility of a falsely negative test, combined with the fact that this tissue is relatively labor-intensive to harvest, limits the use of the third eyelid test in screening for the presence of disease in groups of animals. Determination of the negative disease status of individual animals is not possible with this test.
The lack of a preclinical screening test for live sheep and goats also presents a challenge to the development of an active surveillance program for scrapie. Brain samples from mature animals could be harvested at the time of slaughter, if this occurs in the presence of a trained individual; in order to support effective disease eradication, active surveillance is only useful when a trace back to the source of the infection (infected premises) is possible. The lack of identification in its small ruminant populations is a substantial obstacle that Canada currently faces in the development of active surveillance and effective eradication of scrapie.
Farm management measures
The lack of a useful preclinical diagnostic test for screening large numbers of live sheep and goats means that the current method of preventing the introduction of scrapie is to maintain a closed flock for females and embryos. If replacement ewes are required, they should be sourced from flocks not known to be affected by scrapie and that take measures to prevent the introduction of scrapie. The following are some preventive steps that a potential purchaser or new owner of purchased animals can take.
1. Purchase animals from premises known to be a minimal risk for scrapie.
2. Test for genetic scrapie susceptibility and avoid introducing scrapie-susceptible animals.
3. Limit introductions to males and semen.
4. Although feed has not been identified as a significant factor in the transmission of scrapie, comply with the feed ban. Feed or feed ingredients manufactured and distributed for the use of nonruminant species, such as pigs, poultry, dogs, or cats, should not be fed to sheep or goats.
Scrapie control at the national level
Due to the constraints on active surveillance outlined above, the national scrapie control program has been slow in detecting new infected premises. However, concerns over transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in general may provide the impetus for governments and industry to address such issues as identification and resource implementation, significant enhancements to the national control program.
Footnotes
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Greenwood.
References
- 1.Scofield FW. A case of scrapie in an imported ewe. Rep Ont Vet Coll 1938:34–35.
- 2.Prusiner SB. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 1982;216 (9, Apr):136–144. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.O'Rourke KI, Baszler TV, Besser TE, et al. Preclinical diagnosis of scrapie by immunohistochemistry of third eyelid lymphoid tissue. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:3254–3259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.Pattison IH, Hoare MN, Jebbett JN, Watson WA. Spread of scrapie to sheep and goats by oral dosing with foetal membranes from scrapie-affected sheep. Vet Rec 1972;90:465–468. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Pattison IH, Hoare MN, Jebbett JN, Watson WA. Further observations on the production of scrapie in sheep by oral dosing with foetal membranes from scrapie-affected sheep. Br Vet J 1974;130:1xv–1xvii. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 6.Onodera T, Ikeda T, Maramatsu Y, Shinagawa M. Isolation of the scrapie agent from the placenta of sheep with natural scrapie in Japan. Microbiol Immunol 1993;37:311–316. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Race R, Jenny A, Sutton D. Scrapie infectivity and proteinase K-resistant prion protein in sheep placenta, brain, spleen and lymph node: implications for transmission and antemortem diagnosis. J Infect Dis 1998;178:949–953. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 8.Stockmann S. Scrapie: an obscure disease of sheep. J Comp Pathol 1913;26:317–327.
- 9.Pattison IH, Millson GC. Experimental transmission of scrapie to goats and sheep by the oral route. J Comp Pathol 1961;71:233–244.13692308
- 10.Stamp JT, Brotherston JG, Zlotnik I, Mackay JMK, Smith W. Further studies on scrapie. J Comp Pathol 1959;69;268–280. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Haralambiev H, Ivanov I, Vesselinova A, Mermerski K. An attempt to induce scrapie in local sheep in Bulgaria. Zentralbl Veterinarmed 1973;20:701–709. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12.Foote WC, Clark W, Maciulis A, et al. Prevention of scrapie transmission in sheep using embryo transfer. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54:1863–1868. [PubMed]
- 13.Foster JD, McKelvey WA, Fraser H, et al. Experimentally induced bovine spongiform encephalopathy did not transmit via goat embryos. J Gen Virol 1999;80:517–524. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 14.Foster JD, Hunter N, Williams AI, et al. Observations on the transmission of scrapie in experiments using embryo transfer. Vet Rec 1996;138:559–562. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Foster JD, McKelvey WAA, Mylne JA, et al. Studies on maternal transmission of scrapie in sheep by embryo transfer. Vet Rec 1992;130:341–343. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Pattison IH. Scrapie in the Welsh mountain breed of sheep and its experimental transmission to goats. Vet Rec 1965;77:1388–1390. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17.Young GB, Stamp JT, Renwick CC, Dickinson AG. Field observations on scrapie incidence ARS 91–53. Report of scrapie [seminar], Washington, DC, 1998:199–206.
- 18.Sigurdarson S. Epidemiology of scrapie in Iceland and experience with control measures. In: Bradley R, Savey M, and Marchant B, eds. Sub-acute Spongiform Encephalopathies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publ, 1991:233–242.
- 19.Morgan KL, Nicholas K, Glover MJ, Hall AP. A questionnaire survey of the prevalence of scrapie in sheep in Britain. Vet Rec 1990;127:373–376. [PubMed]
- 20.Wineland NE, Detwiler LA, Salman MD. Epidemiologic analysis of reported scrapie in sheep in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998;212:713–718. [PubMed]
- 21.Dickson AG. Scrapie in sheep and goats. In: Kimberlin RH, ed. Slow Virus Diseases of Animals and Man. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pr, 1976:210–241.
- 22.Geering WA, Forman AJ, Nunn MJ. Exotic diseases of animals: a field guide for Australian vets. Canberra: Australian Govt Publ Service, 1995:291.
- 23.Oesch B, Westaway D, Walchli M, et al. A cellular gene encodes scrapie PrP 27–30 protein. Cell 1985;40:735–746. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 24.Carlson GA, Kingsbury DT, Goodman PA. Linkage of prion protein and scrapie incubation time genes. Cell 1986;46:503–511. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 25.Hunter N, Hope J, McConnell I, Dickinson AG. Linkage of the scrapie-associated fibril protein (PrP) gene and Sinc using congenic mice and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Gen Virol 1987;68:2711–2716. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Hunter N, Foster JD, Dickinson AG, Hope J. Linkage of the gene for the scrapie associated fibrile protein (PrP) to the Sip gene in Cheviot sheep. Vet Rec 1989;124:363–366. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Westaway D, Goodman PA, Mirenda CA, McKinley MP, Carlson GA, Prusiner SB. Distinct prion proteins in short and long scrapie incubation period mice. Cell 1987;51:651–662. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28.Hunter N, Moore L, Hosie BD, Digwall WS, Greig A. Association between natural scrapie and PrP genotype in a flock of Suffolk sheep in scotland. Vet Rec 1997;140:59–63. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Westaway D, Zuliani V, Cooper CM, et al. Homozygosity for prion protein alleles encoding glutamine-171 renders sheep susceptible to natural scrapie. Genes Dev 1994;8:959–969. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 30.O'Rourke KI, Holyoak GR, Clark WW, et al. PrP genotypes and experimental scrapie in orally inoculated Suffolk sheep in the United States. J Gen Virol 1997;78:975–978. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Hoinville LJ. A review of the epidemiology of scrapie in sheep. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 1996;15:827–852. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Smits MA, Bosser A, Schreuder BEC. Prion protein and scrapie susceptibility. Vet Q 1997;19:101–105. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan V, Krehbiel JD, Cao Y, Venta PJ. Development and usefulness of new polymerase chain reaction-based tests for detection of different alleles at codons 136 and 171 of the ovine prion protein gene. Am J Vet Res 1999;60:884–887. [PubMed]
- 34.Thorgeirsdottir S, Sigurdarson S, Thorisson HM, Georgsson G, Palsdottir A. PrP gene polymorphism and natural scrapie in Icelandic sheep. J Gen Virol 1999;80:2527–2534. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Erhart G, Brandt H, Breyhahn R, et al. Conditions and possibilities for genotyping sheep for scrapie resistance as part of breeding programs. Zuchtungskunde 2002;74:6–31.
- 36.Tuo W, O'Rourke KI, Zhuang D, Cheevers WP, Spraker Tr, Knowles DP. Pregnancy status and fetal prion genetics determine PrPSc accumulation in placentomes of scrapie-infected sheep. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:6310–6315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 37.Hadlow WJ, Kennedy RC, Race RE. Natural infection of Suffolk sheep with scrapie virus. J Infect Dis 1982;146:657–664. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Tuo W, Zhuang D, Knowles DP, Cheevers WP, Sy MS, O'Rourke KI. Prp-c and Prp-Sc at the fetal-maternal interface. J Biol Chem 2001;276:18229–18234. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39.VanKeulen LJ, Schreuder BE, Bromans ME, Langeveld JP, Smits MA. Scrapie-associated prion protein in the gastrointestinal tract of sheep with natural scrapie. J Comp Pathol 1999;121:55–63. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 40.Van Keulen LJ, Schreuder BE, Meloen RH, et al. Immunohistochemical detection and localization of prion protein in brain tissue of sheep with natural scrapie. Vet Pathol 1995;32:299–308. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Beekes M, McBride PA. Early accumulation of pathological PrP in the enteric nervous system and gut-associated lymphoid tissue of hamsters orally infected with scrapie. Neurosci Lett 2000;278: 181–184. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 42.Heggebo R, Press CM, Gunnes G. Distribution of prion protein in the ileal Peyer's patch of scrapie-free lambs and lambs naturally and experimentally exposed to the scrapie agent. J Gen Virol 2000;81:2327–2337. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 43.Andreoletti O, Berthon P, Marc, et al. Early accumulation of PrPSc in gut-associated lymphoid and nervous tissues of susceptible sheep from a Romanov flock with natural scrapie. J Gen Virol 2000;81:3115–3126. [DOI] [PubMed]
