Skip to main content
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India logoLink to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India
. 2011 Mar 13;60(4):301–311. doi: 10.1007/s13224-010-0047-7

Colour Doppler in IUGR- Where are we and where do we go?

Lulla Chander 1, Garg Sonal 1,2,
PMCID: PMC3394530

Abstract

Intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR) is an important perinatal problem giving rise to increased morbidity and mortality in the growth restricted fetus. The aim of fetal medicine today, is to prevent the mere occurrence of IUGR in high risk pregnancies and to deliver the fetuses already afflicted with growth restriction, before they have suffered from the effects of hypoxia. The use of Doppler provides this information, which is not readily obtained from the other conventional tests of fetal well being. The Doppler patterns follow a longitudinal trend in the arterial and venous circulation of the fetus as well as the placental vasculature guiding management decisions regarding the appropriate time of delivery. Progressive knowledge of the fetal circulation and its adaptation when the fetus is subjected to hypoxia, has helped us recognize the early signs of IUGR thereby improving the prognosis of these complicated pregnancies. It has therefore become the gold standard in the management of the growth-restricted fetus.

Key words: Intra uterine growth restriction, Fetal circulatory changes in IUGR, Doppler based management in IUGR Aortic Isthmus

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (304.2 KB).

References

  • 1.Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), Mandruzzato GJ Perinatal Medicine- 01- January- 2008; 36(4): (Medline) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism in the Developing Fetus, Adré J. du Plessis, MBChB, MPH, Clinics in Perinatology - Volume 36,Issue 3 (September 2009) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Scifres C.M., Stamilio D., Macones G.A., Odibo A.O. Predicting perinatal mortality in preterm intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(10):723–728. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1223284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kingdom J.C., Burrell S.J., Kaufmann P. Pathology and clinical implications of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9(4):271–286. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.09040271.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Doppler Vascular changes in IUGR-Mari G, Piconi J, Seminars in Perinatology, June 2008 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Relationship between abnormal fetal testing and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction. 2007. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Padmagirison R., Rai L. Fetal doppler versus NST as predictors of adverse perinatal outcome in severe preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;56:134–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Trudinger B.J. Doppler ultrasonography and fetal well being. In: Reece E.A., Hobbins J.C., Mahoney M., editors. Medicine of the fetus and the Mother. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co.; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges, Jun Zhang, PhD, MD, Mario Merialdi, MD, PhD, Lawrence D. Platt, MD, Michael S. Kramer, MD, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology — Volume 202,Issue 6 (June2010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Fleischer A., Schulman H., Farmakides G., Bracero L., Blattner P., Randolph G. Umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:502–505. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90278-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Proctor L.K., Toal M., Keating S., Chitayat D., Okun N., Windrim R.C., et al. Placental size and the prediction of severe early-onset intrauterine growth restriction in women with low pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;4(3):274–282. doi: 10.1002/uog.7308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Usefulness of a placental profile in high-risk pregnancies, Meghana Toal, MBBS1 Cynthia Chan, BSc1, Shafagh Fallah, PhD3, Fawaz Alkazaleh, MD1,Vandana Chaddha, MD1, Rory C. Windrim, MD1, John C.P. Kingdom, MD1,2, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Abnormal fetal cerebral and umbilical doppler measurements in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction predicts the severity of perinatal morbidity, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound Volume 29Issue 3, pages 146–151, Gregory Stearne MD, Lawrence E. Shields, MD, Theodore J. Dubinsky, MD. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Chauhan S.P., Gupta L.M., Hendrix N.W., et al. Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;200:409.e1–409.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yoon B.H., Romero R., Roh C.R., Kim S.H., Ager J.W., Syn H.C., et al. Relationship between the fetal biophysical profile score, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and fetal blood acid-base status determined by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:1586–1594. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90441-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Martinez R., Figueras F., Oros D., et al. Cerebral blood perfusion and neurobehavioral performance in full-term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;201:474.e1–474.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ozcan T., Sbracia M., d’Ancona R.L., Copel J.A., Mari G. Arterial and venous Doppler velocimetry in the severely growth restricted fetus and associations with adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12:39–44. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12010039.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Scherjon S. A., Kok J. H., Oosting H., Zondervan H. A. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of the pulsatility index calculated from pulsed Doppler flow velocity waveforms in three fetal vessels. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1993;100:134–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15208.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Arbeille P., Maulik D., Fignon A., et al. Assessment of the fetal pO2 changes by cerebral and umbilical Doppler on lamb fetuses during acute hypoxia. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21:861–870. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(95)00025-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wladimiroff J.W., Tonge H.M., Stewart P. A. Doppler ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow in the human fetus. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1986;93:471–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Manogura A.C., Turan O., Kush M.L., et al. Predictors of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm growth-restricted neonates. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;198:638.e1–638.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Johnson P., Maxwell D.J., Tynan M.J., Allan L.D. Intracardiac pressures in the human fetus. Heart. 2000;84:59–63. doi: 10.1136/heart.84.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kiserud T., Kessler J., Ebbing C., Rasmussen S. Ductus venosus shunting in growth-restricted fetuses and the effect of umbilical circulatory compromise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:143–1499. doi: 10.1002/uog.2784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Baschat A.A. Fetal responses to placental insufficiency: an update. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111:1031–1041. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Palma-Dias R.S., Fonseca M.M., Brietzke E., Fritsch A., Schlatter D., Maurmann C.B., et al. Screening for placental insufficiency by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 22–24 weeks of gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;24(4):462–469. doi: 10.1159/000178141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Phupong V., Dejthevaporn T. Predicting risks of preeclampsia and small for gestational age infant by uterine artery Doppler. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2008;27(4):387–395. doi: 10.1080/10641950801958059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Toal M., Keating S., Machin G., et al. Determinants of adverse perinatal outcome in high-risk women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler images. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:330.e1–330.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ruskamp, Fouron 2003 Reference values for an index of fetal aortic isthmus blood flow during the second half of pregnancy, Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecology 2003; 21: 441–444 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.Quantitative assessment of circulatory changes in the fetal aortic isthmus during progressive increase of resistance to umbilical blood flow P Bonnin, JC Fouron, G Teyssier, SE Sonesson and A Skoll Circulation 1993;88;216–222 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 30.Fouron JC. 2003. The unrecognized physiological and clinical significance of the fetal aortic isthmus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31.Rizzo G., Capponi A., Vendola M., Pietrolucci M. E., Arduini D. Relationship between aortic isthmus and ductus venosus velocity waveforms in severe growth restricted fetuses. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:1042–1047. doi: 10.1002/pd.2121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.The IUGR prognostic scale, Walid MS — Arch Gynecol Obstet — 01 Dec 2007; 276(6): 633–640 (Medline) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 33.atSerial hemodynamic measurement in normal pregnancy, preeclampsia, and intrauterine growth restriction, Saskia Rang, MDa, Gert A. van Montfrans, PhDb Hans Wolf, PhDa,, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology — Volume 198,Issue 5 (May 2008) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 34.Do growth retarded premature infants have different rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality than appropriately grown premature infants? JM Piper, EMJ Xenakis, MMc Farland, Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 35.Makikallio K. Is it time to add aortic isthmus evaluation to the repertoire of Doppler investigations for placental insufficiency? (Opinion) Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:6–9. doi: 10.1002/uog.5239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ghidini A. Doppler of the ductus venosus in severe preterm growth restriction. Atest in search of a purpose? Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:250–251. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000254964.11691.af. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cognitive function in young adults following intrauterine growth restriction with abnormal fetal aortic blood flow, E. TIDEMAN, K. MARSAL and D. LEY, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 614–618 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.The transitional phase of ductus venosus reversed flow in severely premature IUGR fetuses, Picconi JL-American Journal of Perinatology -01- April- 2008; 25(4): 199–203. (Medline) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 39.Grivell RM, Wong L, Bhatia V. Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jan 21 2009;CD007113. [Medline]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Jasovic-Siveska E.I., Jasovic V.I. Real-time ultrasound in the detection of intrauterine growth retardation in preeclampsia. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2008;109(9):405–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES