Abstract
Objective(s)
To compare the role of middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility indices in predicting the fetal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction.
Method(s)
The prospective study was conducted on 121 subjects. They were divided into two groups. The study group (n=71) consists of high risk group of pregnant women with growth restricted fetuses. The control group (n=50) consists of pregnant women with healthy fetuses. Both the groups were evaluated by middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery velocimetry between 28 and 41 weeks of pregnancy.
Results
Mothers with abnormal velocimetry had more number of cesarean sections to prevent fetal distress than those with normal velocimetry. The subjects with high risk factors had more number of abnormal waveforms than those without high risk factors. The predictive value of Doppler P.I for detecting abnormal fetal outcome was 94% in middle cerebral artery as against 83% for umbilical artery. The sensitivity was 71% for middle cerebral artery versus 44% for umbilical artery.
Conclusion
Growth restricted fetuses with normal flow velocimetry are at a lower risk than those with abnormal velocimetry in terms of poor Apgar score and neonatal intensive care admission. The average birth weight of the neonates with abnormal Doppler studies was lower as compared to that of neonates with normal velocimetry. Thus middle cerebral artery doppler indices were a better predictor for fetal outcome in IUGR when compared with umbilical artery in terms of sensitivity and predictive value.
Keywords: middle cerebral artery, umbilical artery, intrauterine growth restriction pulsatility index, doppler ultrasonography
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (67.5 KB).
References
- 1.Berkowitz G.S., Chitkara U., Rosenberg J., et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight and Doppler analysis of umbilical artery velocimetry in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation. A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:1149–1153. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90243-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mari G., Moise K.J., Jr, Deter R.L., et al. Doppler assessment of the pulsatility index in the cerebral circulation of the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:698–703. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(89)80063-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mari G., Deter R.L. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in normal and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1262–1270. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90620-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Galbraith R.S., Karchmar E.J., Piercy W.N., et al. The clinical prediction of intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;133:281–286. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90679-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rochelson B.L., Schulman H., Fleischer A., et al. The clinical significance of Doppler umbilical artery velocimetry in the small for gestation fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:1223–1226. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90150-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sepulveda W., Shennan A.H., Peek M.J. Reverse end diastolic flow in the middle cerebral artery: an agonal pattern in the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1645–1647. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70622-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wladimiroff J.W., Tonge H.M., Stewart P.A. Doppler ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow in the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93:471–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Trudinger B.J., Giles W.B., Cook C.M. Flow velocity waveforms in the maternal uteroplacental and fetal umbilical placental circulations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;152:155–163. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(85)80016-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fleischer A., Schulman H., Farmakides G., et al. Umbilical artery velocity waveforms and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:502–505. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90278-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]