Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (71.2 KB).
References
- 1.CDC NCHS data brief, centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db,35ltm; Accessed May 7, 2010.
- 2.Chaillet N., Dumont A. Evidence based strategies for reducing caesarean section rates: a Meta-analysis Birth. 2007;34(1):53–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00146.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.RCOG statement on the study on caesarean section rate variance among English NHS Trusts the BMJ, 7 Oct. 2010.
- 4.Kambo I., Bedi N., Dhillon B.S., Saxena N.C. A critical appraisal of caesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int. J. Gynecol Obstetet. 2001;79:151–158. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00226-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Villar J., Vallarade E., Wojdyia, Zavaleta N., Carroli G., Velazia A., et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcome the 2006 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America Lancet. 2006;367:1819–1829. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.American college of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Americal College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists practice bulletin Operative vaginal delivery; Washington DC; ACOG June, 2000.
- 7.Goetzinger K.R., Macones G.D. Operative vaginal delivery: Current trends in Obstetrics Women’s Health (Lond. Engl.) 2008;4(3):281–290. doi: 10.2217/17455057.4.3.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yeomans E.R. Operative vaginal delivery: Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):645–653. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cfbefd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Al-Suhel R., Gill S., Robson S., Shadbolt B. Kjelland’s forceps in the new millennium. Maternal & neonatal outcomes of attepted rational forceps delivery. Aust NZ J. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;49(5):510–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01060.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Johnson RB, Heycock E, Carter J, Sultan AH et al; Maternal and Child Health after assisted vaginal delivery: five year follow up of a randomized controlled study comparing forceps & vacuum; Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol: 1999 Jun, 106(6). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Krause M. The term breech trial; the rise and fall of randomized controlled trial — a critical survey. Geburtshlife Neonatal. 2006;210(4):121–125. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-947215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kok M., Cnossen J., Gravendeel L., Post J.A., Mol B.W. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(1):76–84. doi: 10.1002/uog.6277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists ACOG practice bulletine. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery no.5, July 1999. Clinical management guidelines for Obstetrician and Gynaecologist Int.J Gynecol Obstet Aug. 1999: 66(2) 197–204 [PubMed]
- 14.Jastrow N., Chaillet N., Roberge S., et al. sonographic lower segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: A systematic review. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2010;32(4):321–327. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34475-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]