Skip to main content
International Journal of General Medicine logoLink to International Journal of General Medicine
. 2012 Jun 20;5:547–552. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S31429

Domestic injuries and suicide among women of reproductive age in Iran

Zahra Fardiazar 1, Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani 2,, Reza Mohammadi 3
PMCID: PMC3396110  PMID: 22807643

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to map out some epidemiological aspects of intentional and unintentional injuries among Iranian women of reproductive age using a national registry.

Methods

Injury data were taken from a national-based injury surveillance system over the period 2000–2002. The study population comprised 31.5% of the population of Iran.

Results

Of all the 307,064 domestic injuries reported during the years 2000–2002, about 152,600 cases (49.7%) involved women. About half of these women (76,474) were in the reproductive age group. The majority (42.7%) of injuries among women of reproductive age were burn wounds followed by lacerations in 32.6%. Eighty-five percent of suicide cases were poisonings, followed by 11% for suicides by burning. However, 45.2% of burn suicides were fatal, compared with a 0.89% fatality rate for poisonings. Of all female suicide victims, 1029 died, 174 victims became disabled, while the remainder improved or were undergoing therapy when reported.

Conclusion

Injuries, especially burns, are a major public health problem for women of reproductive age.

Keywords: injuries, women’s health, accidents, burns, falls, poisonings, home safety, domestic injuries, epidemiology

Introduction

The traditional view of injuries as “accidents” or random events, has resulted in historical neglect of this important area of public health.1 Injury epidemiology can be defined as “the study of the distribution and determinants of injuries and safety-related states/events in specified populations, and the application of this study to prevent injuries and promote safety”.2 Reports of injuries, if based on large-scale studies or widespread registries, are appropriate for focusing on specific populations prone to particular diseases and injuries.

The home, which is considered by many people to be a safe haven for living, may not prove to be so, according to statistics for domestic injuries worldwide. Children and women can be at higher risk of injuries in the home due to greater exposure to home hazards. Much research has been done on these injuries, especially during recent decades.3,4 However, most of the available knowledge is based on hospital data, and research data showing details of domestic injuries among women of reproductive age, especially from low-income and middle-income countries, are limited. The aim of this study was to map out some epidemiological aspects of intentional and unintentional injuries among Iranian women of reproductive age using a national registry.

Materials and methods

Injury data were taken from a national-based injury surveillance system for the period 2000–2002. The system included registration forms for home-related injuries treated in health or emergency centers. In addition, a hierarchical reporting system was designed to gather data from all over the country. The surveillance system used in this study was based on the work of 31 Iranian universities in medical sciences and health services that are responsible for both medical education and delivering health services. All catchment areas were encompassed, but some universities initiated their program with just a portion of their population.

The study population comprised 31.5% of the population of Iran. The register was initially constructed in order to map the epidemiology of home-related injuries sustained in the country. In Iran, the population in rural areas, but not that in all urban areas, is well defined, which means that the incidence rate in this study is valid mostly for the former segment of the population and small cities.

The variables for injury recording included a minimum data set which was tested in a pilot program.5 During the implementation phase of the register, a computerized questionnaire was also designed and sent to all health administration centers in the country. A countrywide training program consisting of annual workshops at national, provincial, and district levels had been carried out for all staff who were working in the field.

Seven variables were selected for determination of injury patterns, ie, the specific location of occurrence of injury in the home environment (n = 10), injury mechanism (n = 16), type of injury (n = 16), part of body injured (n = 16), age and gender of the victim, and outcome (n = 4). A standardized registration form was used for data collection. Data were collected at hospital outpatient emergency departments, health care centers in rural and urban areas, and most peripheral health services in rural areas, known as “health houses”. Data entered into a standard questionnaire was created in the Epi6 program, which was available to all health administration centers in the country. All centers were sending a disc to Iran’s Center for Disease Control (CDC) in Tehran annually, and these were merged to form the national dataset. Quality control measures included checking for repeatability of cases, same-month revision of all completed forms, double data entry, missing data, and underreporting. This procedure was supposed to control 20% of all data registered in the first year and 10% in the following years. Supervisors of the program at the provincial and national levels monitored and controlled the data according to the plan. Monitoring excluded checking the completed forms and data entered in the computer system.

For this research, the national dataset was restricted to female injury victims for overall analysis and limited to those 15–49 years of age, generally known as “women of reproductive age”. Data were analyzed using the Stata 11 statistical software package. Both descriptive and analytical methods were used. Frequency and relative frequency tables were produced. Age-adjusted incidence rates and mortality rates were plotted. The denominator for the five-year intervals of age needed to calculate incidence rates was estimated using averages of two national population censuses conducted in 1996 and 2006. The Chi-square test was used to assess predictors of mortality, followed by bivariate estimation of odds ratios along with their 95% confidence intervals. Finally, a logistic regression multivariate analysis was done while adhering to the standards of model development, as well as an assessment of model fitness and appropriateness. The analyses were done in accordance with the ethical codes of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education in Iran.

Results

Of the 307,064 home injuries reported during the years 2000–2002, about 152,600 cases (49.7%) involved women. About half of these women (76,474) belonged to the reproductive age group studied in this research. A histogram of the age distribution is given in Figure 1, and age-adjusted incidence rates are shown in Figure 2. The mean age of the women in the reproductive age group was 28 ± 9.5 years, with a median age of 26 years.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Histogram of age for Iranian women victims of injury.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates for Iranian female injury victims.

Notes: y axis, age-adjusted rates as per 1000 for incidence and per 100,000 for mortality; x axis, age groups of five-year intervals except for older than 80 years.

Overall, 56% of domestic injuries in the women of reproductive age occurred in the living room or a bedroom, 28.4% in the kitchen, 10.3% in the yard or garden, and the remainder occurred in other parts of the house, including the bathroom, stable, stairs, or stockroom, or on the roof. Hands and fingers were injured in 37,934 cases (49.6%), the lower limbs in 16,534 cases (21.6%), with multiple trauma in 2104 cases (2.8%), and involvement of other organs in the remaining cases. With regard to the mechanism of injury, 37.7% of all women and 32.3% of women in the reproductive age group were injured by hot liquids. The rest of the mechanisms of injury along with age group comparisons are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Distribution of injury mechanisms among the women injury victims in Iran compared for the three age groups

Injury mechanism <15 years Reproductive age >49 years Total P value
Attack and sting 691 745 271 1707 <0.001
Collision with sharp objects 8931 22,520 4,437 35,888 <0.001
Collision with substance 3181 3821 1,212 8214 <0.001
Contact with hot objects 3934 4033 1,233 9200 <0.001
Exposure to fire 1782 3206 781 5769 <0.001
Hot liquids 26,328 24,699 6501 57,528 <0.001
Falls 4388 3927 1936 10,251 <0.001
Overthrown (fall at the same level) 4408 4316 2190 10,914 <0.001
Foreign body 493 661 115 1269 <0.01
Chemical materials 218 546 60 824 <0.001
Violence 130 539 73 742 <0.001
Others 376 638 147 1161 <0.01
Suicide 142 2,906 106 3154 <0.001
Overcome by smoke 94 365 58 517 <0.001
Using drugs or poison 1424 3283 147 4854 <0.001
Falling debris 115 151 65 331 <0.001
Drowning 38 6 3 47 <0.001
Electric shock 91 112 27 230 <0.001
Total 56,764 76,474 19,362 152,600 <0.001

The majority (42.7%) of injuries among women of reproductive age were burn wounds followed by lacerations (32.6%, Table 2). Age-adjusted incidence rates for female burn injury victims versus other types of injuries are compared in Figure 3 for the various age groups.

Table 2.

Types of injuries among women trauma victims in Iran

Kind of injury Under 15 years Reproductive age Above 49 years Total
Amputation 116 134 53 303
Bleeding 152 218 56 426
Brain trauma 342 217 91 650
Bumping 1604 2669 921 5194
Burn 32,182 32,620 8593 73,395
Contusion 1047 1165 454 2666
Cuts and lacerations 11,909 24,963 5085 41,957
Eye injury 189 267 22 478
Fractures 3189 3174 2265 8628
Multiple 52 87 32 171
Others 199 300 52 551
Pain 280 413 119 812
Poisoning 1755 6280 295 8330
Shock 67 69 18 154
Suffocation 147 164 34 345
Crush injuries 3534 3734 1272 8540
Total 56,764 76,474 19,362 152,600

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Age-adjusted incidence rates for Iranian female burn injury victims versus other types of injuries.

Notes: x axis, age groups of five-year intervals except for over 80 years; y axis, age-adjusted rates as per 1000.

Eighty-five percent of suicides were the result of poisonings, followed by 11% due to burns. However, 45.2% of suicides by burning were fatal compared with a fatality rate of only 0.89% for poisoning. This means a 50 times higher risk of fatality for self-inflicted burns compared with poisoning.

For all the injuries, 42.5%, 27.2%, and 30.3% were reported by primary health centers, secondary health centers, and hospitals, respectively. Of the female cases, 1029 died, 174 became disabled, and the remainder improved or were undergoing therapy when reported. Multivariate analysis found that age group, injury mechanism, and injured body part were significant predictors of death. On bivariate analysis, women of reproductive age had the highest likelihood of death compared with those who were younger or older. The adjusted odds ratio of death, through multivariate analysis, for the reproductive age group remained higher than for childhood injuries, but was slightly lower than the figure for the group aged 50 years and older. The adjusted odds ratios from the multivariate analysis are given in Table 3. Among women of reproductive age, the risk of dying after injury was 5.5 times higher for burns versus other types of injury (95% confidence interval 4.6–6.6).

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios for injury death predictors derived from logistic regression analysis of Iranian national registry data

Death predictors OR [95% CI]

Reference group
Injury mechanism
Attack and sting
 Collision with sharp objects 0.1 0.0390539 0.3863006
 Collision with substance 0.5 0.1582152 1.535345
 Contact with hot objects 1.9 0.7130849 5.57533
 Exposure to fire 27.6 10.28564 74.12296
 Hot liquids 0.8 0.2783321 2.064572
 Falls 1.8 0.6655159 5.115443
 Overthrown (fall at the same level) 0.5 0.1512783 1.404848
 Foreign body 2.8 0.8299897 9.202418
 Chemical materials 30.4 10.95673 84.18282
 Violence 6.1 2.008061 18.58508
 Others 7.4 2.533444 21.49362
 Suicide 31.8 11.78978 85.76353
 Overcome by smoke 28.6 10.08895 80.84251
 Using drugs or poisons 3 1.074721 8.577741
 Falling debris 9.8 3.072298 31.24254
 Drowning 222.9 69.42403 716.0821
 Electric shock 21.7 6.829051 68.69778
Age group
 <15 years
 Reproductive age 1.7 1.409415 1.986962
 Beyond reproductive age Body part 2.1 1.689494 2.628329
 Head and neck injuries and brain trauma 2.6 1.980075 3.407706

Discussion

In this study, the incidence of injuries were found to be higher among preschool-aged children. This is in line with previous overall and injury-specific studies.6,7 Younger middle-aged women, although they had lower incidence rates, had higher mortality rates, indicative of higher case fatality in the early reproductive years. Consistent results from multivariate analysis indicated that women of reproductive age had a higher likelihood of death compared with younger women. Although this group of injury victims are not well addressed in the research literature, some burn studies have reported such a pattern.8

The mortality slope was found to start increasing after the age of 10 years, and remaining high for up to the first two decades of life. In Iranian culture, women are responsible for doing household chores, mainly cooking and cleaning. Some young females are employed in households that are not their own, while others are obliged to work in their home as family members.9 The risk may decrease in later life for two reasons; the first is that women become more skilled as they get older, and the second is that, through the later phase of their reproductive life, their daughters grow older and share both the responsibilities and the risks.

The majority of injuries among women of reproductive age were burns, which are among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide.10 Traffic accidents rank first in injury morbidity and mortality in many countries, including Iran. Burns rank second in childhood and third overall among injuries in Iran.11,12 Although little research has focused on injuries in the reproductive age group, some regional studies have found burns to be catastrophic injuries during pregnancy.1315 Nevertheless, when it comes to domestic injuries among women of reproductive age, our research showed that burns are the leading cause of both morbidity and mortality. This could be due to the fact that cooking at home is the most important domestic responsibility of women in Iran. Burns, cuts, and lacerations may be the most common risks of unsafe cooking practices. A major concern in this regard would be safety procedures for cooking at home. Cooking safety is dependent on the safety of cooking appliances, and unsafe behaviors and a dangerous cooking environment all need to be addressed in prevention work.1618 Although women of reproductive age are at higher risk of cooking-related injuries, cooking is not the sole source of domestic injuries in women and, like other family members, they are also susceptible to other sources of injury.

As could be inferred from Table 1, women of reproductive age are more likely to be involved in violence and injuries related to suicide. We found that self-inflicted burns were 50 times more likely to be fatal compared with suicide by poisoning. Self-inflicted burns are shown to be a major public health problem in Iran, and particularly so among young women.19,20 The attention of health policy-makers in Iran needs to be drawn to this problem. Regardless of regional variations in suicide patterns, mortality from suicide is undoubtedly a major public health problem. According to a World Health Organization report, approximately one million people worldwide died as a result of suicide in 2000.21

A large number of staff are currently employed in the Iranian health care system to work specifically in the field of reproductive health and primary health care in childhood, so it seems quite reasonable to consider possible integration of a focused national injury prevention and safety promotion program into the current health service package delivered to women of reproductive age.

Like any other register-based study, we were able to study only the most important variables of interest in injury research because of the minimum data requirement in national registers. Underregistration of death counts is common in death registry systems, and it is even higher in event-disease registers that also collect information about outcome measures, including mortality.22 Our study is not an exception, and the injury incidence and mortality rates presented here should be interpreted as minimum rates due to inevitable underestimation.

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Krug EG, Sharma GK, Lozano R. The global burden of injuries. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(4):523–526. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.4.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sadeghi-Bazargani H. Injury epidemiology and publishing injury research. J Inj Violence Res. 2012;4(1):1. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v4i1.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arshi S, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Mohammadi R, Mohammad Zadeh MS, Rouhi A, Barak M. Burns comprising 3/4th of home injuries in preschool children of rural areas of Ardabil province, Iran. J Med Sci. 2007;7(2):248–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Mohammadi R, Svanstrom L, et al. Epidemiology of minor and moderate burns in rural Ardabil, Iran. Burns. 2010;36(6):933–937. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mohammadi R, Ekman R, Svanstrom L, Gooya MM. Rationales for home safety promotion in the Iranian primary healthcare system: results from a pilot study. Public Health. 2006;120(1):58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Allorto NL, Oosthuizen GV, Clarke DL, Muckart DJ. The spectrum and outcome of burns at a regional hospital in South Africa. Burns. 2009;35(7):1004–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.MacKenzie EJ. Epidemiology of injuries: current trends and future challenges. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(1):112–119. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a018006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Mohammadi R. Epidemiology of burns in Iran during the last decade (2000–2010): review of literature and methodological considerations. Burns. 2011;38(3):319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mohammadi R, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Gooya MM. Box 4.2 in: World Report on Child Injury Prevention. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2008. Burns to young working females in work and home settings. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349(9063):1436–1442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Naghavi M, Djafari N, Alaeddini F, Akbari I. Injury Epidemiology in the Islamic Republic of Iran. 1st ed. Tehran, Iran: Iranian Ministry of Health Publications; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Naghavi M, Abolhassani F, Pourmalek F, Jafari N, Moradi M, Eshrati B. Burden of diseases and injuries in Iran. Iran J Epidemiol. 2009;4(1):1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pacheco LD, Gei AF, VanHook JW, Saade GR, Hankins GD. Burns in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5 Pt 2):1210–1212. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000164062.93264.08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mabrouk AR, el-Feky AE. Burns during pregnancy: a gloomy outcome. Burns. 1997;23(7–8):596–600. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(97)00055-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Maghsoudi H, Samnia R, Garadaghi A, Kianvar H. Burns in pregnancy. Burns. 2006;32(2):246–250. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peck MD, Kruger GE, van der Merwe AE, Godakumbura W, Ahuja RB. Burns and fires from non-electric domestic appliances in low and middle income countries. Part I: the scope of the problem. Burns. 2008;34(3):303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peck MD, Kruger GE, van der Merwe AE, et al. Burns and injuries from non-electric-appliance fires in low- and middle-income countries Part II: a strategy for intervention using the Haddon matrix. Burns. 2008;34(3):312–319. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sadeghi BH, Arshi S, Ekman R, Mohammadi R. Prevention-oriented epidemiology of burns in Ardabil provincial burn centre, Iran. Burns. 2011;37(3):521–527. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maghsoudi H, Garadagi A, Jafary GA, et al. Women victims of self-inflicted burns in Tabriz, Iran. Burns. 2004;30(3):217–220. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2003.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ahmadi A, Mohammadi R, Stavrinos D, Almasi A, Schwebel DC. Self-immolation in Iran. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(3):451–460. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31817112f1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.De Leo D, Bertolote J, Lester D. World Report on Violence and Health. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mathers C, Lopez A, Salomon J, Ezzati M. National burden of disease studies: a practical guide. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2001. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of General Medicine are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES