Abstract
Experimental models of autoimmune diseases have led to the conclusion that an immune response to nuclear antigens is a sentinel marker for loss of tolerance and potential tissue damage. Various proteins are targets of antinuclear antibodies in a variety of autoimmune diseases, ranging from systemic rheumatologic disorders to diseases affecting specific organs such as the liver. Autoantibodies against specific nuclear constituents have also been used as probes to understand the structure and the function of the targeted components and their relevance to disease pathogenesis. Approximately a quarter of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) have antibodies targeting proteins of the nuclear pore complex (NPC), a multi-protein structure that mediates molecular transport across the nuclear envelope. Autoantibodies against the integral membrane glycoprotein gp210 and nucleoporin p62 appear to be highly specific for PBC, an autoimmune disease characterized by progressive destruction of intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells. This review discusses the diagnostic and clinical relevance of anti-NPC antibodies in PBC and the possibility that this autoimmune response may arise as a result of molecular mimicry.
Keywords: autoantibody, autoantigen, autoimmunity, nuclear envelope, nuclear pore complex, nucleoporin, primary biliary cirrhosis
INTRODUCTION
Loss of immunological tolerance to the nucleus is among the best-studied topics in autoimmunity, largely due to the fact that anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) are frequently present in a variety of autoimmune diseases [1–11]. However, the mechanisms responsible for the induction of immune responses against distinct nuclear antigens and their relevance to specific diseases remain elusive. ANA can be predictive of the future development of autoimmune disease and present years or possibly even decades before the onset of clinically evident disease [9]. To complicate the matter, ANA can be found at relatively low titers in up to 5% of “healthy” individuals, with the prevalence increasing with age. In some cases, ANA may be irrelevant to pathogenesis, possibly conferring protection from development of disease [12–14].
ANA are generally detected in clinical laboratories by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy (IIF) using as a substrate HEp-2 cells, a human laryngeal carcinoma line. HEp-2 cells are usually selected because they have large nuclei and cells in the preparations can be present in various stages of mitosis, allowing for discrimination of distinct staining patterns [15–18]. Nuclear fluorescence indicates not only the presence of ANA but also the localization of reactive antigens within the nucleus, as characteristic staining patterns are frequently correlated with specific diseases [15, 18, 19].
ANA in serum samples from patients with PBC often produce a rim-like pattern when examined by IIF, suggesting that the targets of the autoantibodies are components of the nuclear envelope (NE) [20–24]. A smooth rim-like fluorescence pattern suggests antibody recognition of an antigen of the nuclear lamina or inner nuclear membrane whereas a punctate pattern suggests that the recognized antigen is a component of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) [15, 19]. Autoantibodies specific for constituents of the NE antibodies have also been described in other autoimmune diseases sometimes associated with PBC, such as Sjögren’s syndrome [25]. Additionally, such autoantibodies are occasionally present in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and mixed connective tissue disorders [26, 27]. These findings have prompted a series of investigations to define the autoantigens of the NE in PBC and to attempt to dissect their role in pathogenesis.
The NE
The NE is a highly organized membranous structure [28] divided into the nuclear membranes (outer, inner and pore domains), NPCs and the nuclear lamina. The outer nuclear membrane is directly continuous with the rough endoplasmic reticulum and the perinuclear space separates the inner from the outer membrane. The inner and pore membranes contain unique sets of intrinsic and extrinsic proteins [28, 29]. The lamins, intermediate filament proteins that form the nuclear lamina, are extrinsic proteins of the inner nuclear membrane. Some transmembrane proteins freely diffuse between the inner, outer and pore membrane domains of the NE without concentrating in any of them. NPCs are located at sites at where the inner and outer membranes fuse to form the pore membranes. Most of the protein building blocks of the NPC are called nucleoporins, some of which are transmembrane proteins of the pore membrane and most of which are non-membrane proteins of the complex.
The NPC
The number of NPCs varies among different cell types of different species. Among mammals, there are approximately 3,000 to 5,000 NPCs per nucleus. During interphase, the passage of molecules from and to the nucleus occurs strictly via the NPC. It is ~100–120 nm in diameter with a central transport channel measuring ~40 nm in diameter. The aqueous central transport channel allows for the exchange of macromolecules including RNA, proteins and ribonucleoproteins across the nuclear envelope, a process assisted by soluble transport receptors [29, 30]. NPCs are also involved in chromatin organization, control of gene expression and replication-coupled DNA repair [29]. Electron microscopy and more recently X-ray crystallography have helped elucidate the structure and unique architecture of NPCs, in addition to providing insight as to how these macromolecular structures regulate the bidirectional exchange of macromolecules between the cytoplasm and nucleus [29, 31]. NPCs have a central doughnut-shaped central core with an eightfold rotational symmetry associated with cytoplasmic filaments and a nuclear basket, each composed of complexes of various nucleoporins (Figure 1) [29, 31]. This distinctive architecture gives to NPC the flexibility required for the dynamic macromolecular translocation [31–33].
Figure 1.
Schematic diagram of a nuclear pore complex showing its major substructures and known localizations of several nucleoporins.
NPCs were first described sixty years ago with the advent of electron microscopy; however, mechanistic details regarding their functions have only recently been elucidated [34–37]. The nucleoporins comprise a family of at least 30 different evolutionary conserved proteins [29, 32, 33, 38, 39]. Each nucleoporin exists in multiple copies, and approximately 500–1,000 protein molecules are present in the fully assembled NPC. A nucleoporin is generically denoted as Nup, followed by a number that refers to its molecular mass. However, a uniform nomenclature has not yet been agreed upon and the molecular masses of nucleoporins vary among species. Several authors have adopted a classification based on the approximate localization within the NPC. This classification has led to six categories including: (A) integral membrane proteins of the pore membrane domain of NE; (B) membrane-apposed coat nucleoporins; (C) adaptor nucleoporins; (D) channel nucleoporins; (E) nuclear basket nucleoporins; and, (F) cytoplasmic filament nucleoporins.
Antibodies against gp210 in PBC
In the late 1980s, Lozano et al [23] and Lassoued et al [21] demonstrated that serum samples from patients with PBC give a rim-like pattern when examined by IIF and that the antibodies recognized a NE protein with a molecular weight of approximately 200 kDa. A subsequent study by Courvalin et al identified this protein as gp210 [40]. Nickowitz et al [41] expressed a full-length recombinant gp210 and showed that all serum samples from patients with PBC reacting with the 200 kDa protein recognized the recombinant protein, thus confirming the identity of gp210 as the 200 kDa target in PBC.
Gp210 is a type I integral membrane protein that anchors NPCs to the pore membrane [42, 43]. It has a cytoplasmic C-terminal tail domain that faces the nuclear pore complex and an N-terminal domain located in the perinuclear space. The C-terminal tail of gp210 consists of 58 amino acids while the luminal domain contains 1808 amino acids (including the signal sequence) with several N-linked oligosaccharides. Gp210 likely participates in the events that take place when a new nuclear pore complex is formed, as well as the transmission of signals from the perinuclear cisterna to the nuclear pore [44]. There are data to suggest that gp210 is organized into the pore membrane as a large array of dimers that may form a luminal submembranous protein skeleton [44].
Anti-gp210 antibodies in PBC are immunoglobulin G isotype and primarily recognize a 15-amino acid linear stretch within the C-terminal domain of the protein [45]. A second subdominant epitope at the N-terminal end of the antigen has also been described but the significance of this finding remains elusive [46]. Most studies investigating the prevalence of anti-gp210 antibodies in patients with PBC have used purified extracts of NE proteins from various cell preparations or recombinant or synthetic polypeptides corresponding the C-terminal epitopic region. The majority of these studies reveal a ≥96% specificity of anti-gp210 antibodies for PBC [21, 23, 25, 41, 46–54]. Depending on the assay and the cohort, the prevalence of anti-gp210 in PBC varies, ranging from 9.4%[41] to 41.2% [23]. Most studies report a prevalence of anti-gp210 antibodies in PBC within a 22–32% range [21, 46–48, 50–54]. A multicenter study including 1,175 patients with PBC from North America, Europe and Japan reported anti-gp210 antibody reactivity in 17.9% (210 cases) patients with PBC [55]. The same study demonstrated that anti-gp210 antibodies were slightly less prevalent in patients with a diagnosis of PBC but without antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) detected by IIF (37/253, 14.6%) compared to those with detectable AMA (174/922, 18.9%). Similar findings have been obtained in another cohort of patients with PBC [56].
Antibodies against Nup62 in PBC
Nup62 was the first nucleoprotein to be identified and characterized [38]. It is a 60kD glycoprotein, which forms a subcomplex with nucleoporins p54, p58/p45 [57, 58]. Like one third of nucleoporins, p62 contains phenylalanine-glycine repeats. These repeats are part of larger motifs, which constitute binding sites for nuclear transport receptors and are involved in mRNA export [29, 59].
In contrast to antibodies against gp210, the significance of antibodies against nup62 in PBC remains less well established. Wesierska-Gadek et al [60] reported anti-nup62 antibodies in 32% of patients with PBC. In two studies, Miyachi and colleagues [51] reported the presence of anti-nup62 antibodies in 7 of 31 (22%) and 40 of 128 (31%) of patients with PBC [25]. Wesierska-Gadek et al [61] et al provided data suggesting that a highly-sensitive assay based on immunoprecipitation of recombinant antigen may more frequently detect reactivity to nup62 in PBC [62]. Some studies have also reported anti-nup62 reactivity in SLE and Sjögren’s syndrome [25–27, 63]; however, whether these patients had concomitant PBC is not clear [51]. Kraemer et al studied a small cohort of patients with SLE and detected anti-nup62 antibodies in 6 out of 25 (24%) [27]; however, the control group only included two unaffected individuals, raising concerns about the specificity of their assay. Kreamer et al. also reported an association between anti-nup62 antibodies and renal damage or advanced neuropathy but this correlation has not bee repeated [27]. No sera from patients with SLE were included in the control groups tested by Miyachi et al [25, 51] and Wesierska-Gadek [60–62, 64], leaving unanswered the question as to the prevalence of anti-nup62 in this disease. The simultaneous presence of gp210 and nup62 autoantibodies appears to be a characteristic feature of PBC [51] with few exceptions [63].
A single study has shown that anti-nup62 antibodies are directed against an epitope within the amino terminal of the protein [26]. Preliminary results published by Meda et al [65] suggest that the region spanning amino acids 473 to 499 of nup62 is the major CD4+ T cell epitope. Some evidence suggests a lack of distinct linear B-cell epitopes on nup62 [65].
Clinical significance of anti-NPC antibodies in PBC
Early studies provided inconsistent results regarding the clinical significance of anti-gp210 antibodies in PBC. Lassoued and colleagues originally reported no difference between patients with and without detectable anti-gp210 antibodies in regards to biochemical indices of liver disease, clinical outcome or histological lesions [21]. Patients with anti-gp210 antibodies less frequently had PBC-related extrahepatic diseases, such as arthralgias and Raynaud's phenomenon, and had significantly lower titers of AMA [21]. A retrospective study of 159 patients with PBC also failed to demonstrate a correlation between the presence of anti-gp210 antibodies and prognosis, although this study reported a higher incidence of arthritis in patients [41]. A multi-center Japanese study did not reveal a relationship between the presence of anti-gp210 antibodies and histological staging in patients with PBC [25]. In contrast, other studies have reported a poor prognosis and more severe disease in patients with PBC and anti-gp210 antibodies. These disparate findings may be explained by the ethnic origins or geographic locations of patients with PBC or the different antigenic preparations and assays used for anti-gp210 antibody detection [16, 17].
In 2001, Invernizzi et al assessed the clinical significance of antibody reactivity to NPC proteins using proteins purified from cellular extracts [66] and found that patients with PBC with detectable anti-NPC antibodies more frequently manifested cirrhosis. A subsequent study by the same group suggested that the presence of anti-NPC antibodies identified a group of patients that progressed faster and experienced a more unfavorable clinical course [64]. Nakamura et al [54] conducted a multi-center study based on retrospective cohorts of patients with PBC in the National Hospital Organization Study Group for Liver Disease in Japan and found that a sustained antibody response to the C-terminal immunodominant epitope of gp210 identified patients who were at higher risk for progression to end-stage liver disease. They further reported that patients who received ursodiol but retained high-titer serum antibodies to gp210 had a higher incidence of progression to end-stage liver disease [54].
The clinical significance of antibodies to gp210 have also been investigated in Japanese, British, Spanish, Italian and Greek cohorts of PBC and these studies have suggested that the their presence is associated with more severe disease and a worse prognosis [48, 56, 67, 68]. Nakamura et al [69] examined the expression of gp210 in livers and found significantly greater immunostaining for the protein in the NE of small bile ducts of subjects with PBC compared to controls. The same study reported that patients with greater portal inflammation, interface hepatitis and lobular inflammation expressed more gp210 in biliary epithelial cells [69]. These results led the authors to speculate that increased and/or aberrant expression of gp210 in small intrahepatic bile duct cells may contribute to their immune-mediated destruction. However, Nakamura et al [69] also noted increased gp210 immunostaining in 10–58% of specimens from patients without serum antibodies against gp210 who had chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C and autoimmune hepatitis, suggesting that over-expression of gp210 in biliary cells is not restricted to PBC. The authors subsequently reported in 276 patients with PBC that anti-gp210 antibodies were an independent risk factor for more severe interface hepatitis, lobular inflammation and ductular proliferation [53].
Anti-NPC antibodies after liver transplantation
Recurrence of PBC in the allograft after orthotopic liver transplantation has been well documented [70–73]. The persistence of PBC-specific AMA and ANA post-transplant has also been reported [50, 72, 73]. Mattalia and colleagues [50] tested patients for serum anti-gp210 autoantibodies before and after orthotopic liver transplantation and demonstrated that these autoantibodies persisted in the majority of patients after receiving allografts. A subsequent study by Luettig et al largely confirmed these findings, finding that gp210 autoantibodies may decrease in titer after transplantation but generally persist even after more than six years [52]. The lower antibody titers may result from intensive post-transplant immunsuppression. In a French series of patients with PBC who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation, the majority of patients had anti-gp210 antibodies six years afterwards [74].
Do anti-NPC antibodies arise by molecular mimicry?
A long-standing hypothesis about autoantibody generation in autoimmune diseases is that it is due to molecular mimicry. Shimoda et al [75] investigated the possible role of molecular mimicry between nuclear and mitochondrial antigens recognized by T-cells in PBC and identified sequences of various nuclear antigens, including gp210, sharing motifs of glutamate-any amino acid-aspartate-lysine or glutamate-isoleucine-glutamate-any amino acid-aspartate, which were also essential for the recognition of the major CD4 T-cell epitope on the E2 subunit of mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC-E2), the major target antigen of AMA [75]. The immunodominant PDC-E2 peptide was used to generate six reactive T cell clones, five of which reacted with gp210 mimics with prominent reactivity involving a peptide spanning amino acids 188–201 [75]. Shimoda et al also established three CD4 T-cell clones selected by recombinant gp210 and found that the epitope recognized by one clone was also reactive with the 188–201 peptide [75]. These results suggest that anti-gp210 autoantibodies may arise from molecular mimicry of PDC-E2 in PBC.
CONCLUSIONS
Autoantibodies against gp210, an integral membrane protein of the nuclear pore complex, are very specific for PBC. Autoantibodies against nup62, a non-membrane nucleoporin, also occur in the disease. Some studies suggest that these autoantibodies may identify individuals with PBC who have more severe disease and a poorer outcome; however, prospective studies are lacking. It remains unclear whether the loss of immunological tolerance and the induction of immune responses to these NPC antigens is an epiphenomenon, subsequent to cell destruction during an autoimmune assault, or primarily involved in the tissue pathogenesis of PBC.
TAKE-HOME MESSAGES.
-
*
Loss of immunological tolerance to the nucleus is amongst the best studied topics in autoimmunity.
-
*
The diversity of the repertoire that reflect ANAs is often disease specific.
-
*
In primary biliary cirrhosis, ANAs react with unique components of the nuclear envelope.
-
*
Understanding the organization of the membranous structure of the nuclear envelope is critical for defining the specificity of ANAs in PBC.
-
*
Anti-gp210 autoantibodies in PBC primarily recognize a 15 amino acid stretch within the C terminal domain.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Financial support provided by National Institutes of Health grant DK39588.
Abbreviations
- AMA
antimitochondrial antibodies
- ANA
antinuclear antibodies
- IIF
indirect immunofluorescence microscopy
- NE
nuclear envelope
- NPC
nuclear pore complex
- Nup
nucleoporin
- PBC
primary biliary cirrhosis
- PDC-E2
E2 subunit of mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex
- SLE
systemic lupus erythematosus
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Agmon-Levin N, Shapira Y, Selmi C, Barzilai O, Ram M, Szyper-Kravitz M, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of serum autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis. Journal of autoimmunity. 2010;34:55–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aringer M, Smolen JS. Therapeutic blockade of TNF in patients with SLE-Promising or crazy? Autoimmunity reviews. 2012;11:321–325. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Belizna C, Henrion D, Beucher A, Lavigne C, Ghaali A, Levesque H. Anti-Ku antibodies: Clinical, genetic and diagnostic insights. Autoimmunity reviews. 2010;9:691–694. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bonaguri C, Melegari A, Ballabio A, Parmeggiani M, Russo A, Battistelli L, et al. Italian multicentre study for application of a diagnostic algorithm in autoantibody testing for autoimmune rheumatic disease: conclusive results. Autoimmunity reviews. 2011;11:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Defendenti C, Atzeni F, Spina MF, Grosso S, Cereda A, Guercilena G, et al. Clinical and laboratory aspects of Ro/SSA-52 autoantibodies. Autoimmunity reviews. 2011;10:150–154. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee TP, Tang SJ, Wu MF, Song YC, Yu CL, Sun KH. Transgenic overexpression of anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibody and activation of Toll-like receptor 4 in mice induce severe systemic lupus erythematosus syndromes. Journal of autoimmunity. 2010;35:358–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2010.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Perl A. Pathogenic mechanisms in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity. 2010;43:1–6. doi: 10.3109/08916930903374741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Szalat R, Ghillani-Dalbin P, Jallouli M, Amoura Z, Musset L, Cacoub P, et al. Anti-NuMA1 and anti-NuMA2 (anti-HsEg5) antibodies: Clinical and immunological features: A propos of 40 new cases and review of the literature. Autoimmunity reviews. 2010;9:652–656. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tan EM, Schur PH, Carr RI, Kunkel HG. Deoxybonucleic acid (DNA) and antibodies to DNA in the serum of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Invest. 1966;45:1732–1740. doi: 10.1172/JCI105479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ullal AJ, Reich CF, 3rd, Clowse M, Criscione-Schreiber LG, Tochacek M, Monestier M, et al. Microparticles as antigenic targets of antibodies to DNA and nucleosomes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Journal of autoimmunity. 2011;36:173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang YH, Yan Y, Rice JS, Volpe BT, Diamond B. Enforced expression of the apoptosis inhibitor Bcl-2 ablates tolerance induction in DNA-reactive B cells through a novel mechanism. Journal of autoimmunity. 2011;37:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shoenfeld Y, Toubi E. Protective autoantibodies: role in homeostasis, clinical importance, and therapeutic potential. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:2599–2606. doi: 10.1002/art.21252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Meroni PL, Shoenfeld Y. Predictive, protective, orphan autoantibodies: the example of anti-phospholipid antibodies. Autoimmunity reviews. 2008;7:585–587. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Forger F, Matthias T, Oppermann M, Becker H, Helmke K. Clinical significance of anti-dsDNA antibody isotypes: IgG/IgM ratio of anti-dsDNA antibodies as a prognostic marker for lupus nephritis. Lupus. 2004;13:36–44. doi: 10.1191/0961203304lu485oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Worman HJ. Nuclear envelope protein autoantigens in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatol Res. 2007;37(Suppl 3):S406–S411. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bogdanos DP, Invernizzi P, Mackay IR, Vergani D. Autoimmune liver serology: current diagnostic and clinical challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3374–3387. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bogdanos DP, Komorowski L. Disease-specific autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:502–512. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Courvalin JC, Worman HJ. Nuclear envelope protein autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis. 1997;17:79–90. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1007185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Worman HJ, Courvalin JC. Antinuclear antibodies specific for primary biliary cirrhosis. Autoimmunity reviews. 2003;2:211–217. doi: 10.1016/s1568-9972(03)00013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ruffatti A, Arslan P, Floreani A, De Silvestro G, Calligaro A, Naccarato R, et al. Nuclear membrane-staining antinuclear antibody in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. J Clin Immunol. 1985;5:357–361. doi: 10.1007/BF00918255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lassoued K, Brenard R, Degos F, Courvalin JC, Andre C, Danon F, et al. Antinuclear antibodies directed to a 200-kilodalton polypeptide of the nuclear envelope in primary biliary cirrhosis. A clinical and immunological study of a series of 150 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1990;99:181–186. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91246-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lassoued K, Guilly MN, Danon F, Andre C, Dhumeaux D, Clauvel JP, et al. Antinuclear autoantibodies specific for lamins. Characterization and clinical significance. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:829–833. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-6-829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lozano F, Pares A, Borche L, Plana M, Gallart T, Rodes J, et al. Autoantibodies against nuclear envelope-associated proteins in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1988;8:930–938. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840080438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Courvalin JC, Lassoued K, Worman HJ, Blobel G. Identification and characterization of autoantibodies against the nuclear envelope lamin B receptor from patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. J Exp Med. 1990;172:961–967. doi: 10.1084/jem.172.3.961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Miyachi K, Hankins RW, Matsushima H, Kikuchi F, Inomata T, Horigome T, et al. Profile and clinical significance of anti-nuclear envelope antibodies found in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: a multicenter study. Journal of autoimmunity. 2003;20:247–254. doi: 10.1016/s0896-8411(03)00033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kraemer DM, Kraus MR, Kneitz C, Tony HP. Nucleoporin p62 antibodies in a case of mixed connective tissue disease. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003;10:329–331. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.10.2.329-331.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kraemer DM, Tony HP. Nuclear Pore Protein p62 Autoantibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Open Rheumatol J. 2010;4:24–27. doi: 10.2174/1874312901004010024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hetzer MW. The nuclear envelope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2:a000539. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hoelz A, Debler EW, Blobel G. The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:613–643. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060109-151030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Macara IG. Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001;65:570–594. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.4.570-594.2001. table of contents. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hsia KC, Stavropoulos P, Blobel G, Hoelz A. Architecture of a coat for the nuclear pore membrane. Cell. 2007;131:1313–1326. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature. 2007;450:695–701. doi: 10.1038/nature06405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, et al. Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies. Nature. 2007;450:683–694. doi: 10.1038/nature06404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Callan HG, Tomlin SG. Experimental studies on amphibian oocyte nuclei. I. Investigation of the structure of the nuclear membrane by means of the electron microscope. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1950;137:367–378. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1950.0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Watson ML. Further observations on the nuclear envelope of the animal cell. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1959;6:147–156. doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.2.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rout MP, Blobel G. Isolation of the yeast nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1993;123:771–783. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.4.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Matunis MJ, Coutavas E, Blobel G. A novel ubiquitin-like modification modulates the partitioning of the Ran-GTPase-activating protein RanGAP1 between the cytosol and the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol. 1996;135:1457–1470. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.6.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Davis LI, Blobel G. Identification and characterization of a nuclear pore complex protein. Cell. 1986;45:699–709. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90784-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.DeGrasse JA, DuBois KN, Devos D, Siegel TN, Sali A, Field MC, et al. Evidence for a shared nuclear pore complex architecture that is conserved from the last common eukaryotic ancestor. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:2119–2130. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900038-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Courvalin JC, Lassoued K, Bartnik E, Blobel G, Wozniak RW. The 210-kD nuclear envelope polypeptide recognized by human autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis is the major glycoprotein of the nuclear pore. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:279–285. doi: 10.1172/JCI114696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nickowitz RE, Wozniak RW, Schaffner F, Worman HJ. Autoantibodies against integral membrane proteins of the nuclear envelope in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1994;106:193–199. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(94)95333-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wozniak RW, Bartnik E, Blobel G. Primary structure analysis of an integral membrane glycoprotein of the nuclear pore. J Cell Biol. 1989;108:2083–2092. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.6.2083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Greber UF, Senior A, Gerace L. A major glycoprotein of the nuclear pore complex is a membrane-spanning polypeptide with a large lumenal domain and a small cytoplasmic tail. EMBO J. 1990;9:1495–1502. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08267.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Favreau C, Bastos R, Cartaud J, Courvalin JC, Mustonen P. Biochemical characterization of nuclear pore complex protein gp210 oligomers. Eur J Biochem. 2001;268:3883–3889. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02290.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nickowitz RE, Worman HJ. Autoantibodies from patients with primary biliary cirrhosis recognize a restricted region within the cytoplasmic tail of nuclear pore membrane glycoprotein Gp210. J Exp Med. 1993;178:2237–2242. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.6.2237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wesierska-Gadek J, Hohenauer H, Hitchman E, Penner E. Autoantibodies from patients with primary biliary cirrhosis preferentially react with the amino-terminal domain of nuclear pore complex glycoprotein gp210. J Exp Med. 1995;182:1159–1162. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.4.1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bandin O, Courvalin JC, Poupon R, Dubel L, Homberg JC, Johanet C. Specificity and sensitivity of gp210 autoantibodies detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a synthetic polypeptide in the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1996;23:1020–1024. doi: 10.1002/hep.510230512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Itoh S, Ichida T, Yoshida T, Hayakawa A, Uchida M, Tashiro-Itoh T, et al. Autoantibodies against a 210 kDa glycoprotein of the nuclear pore complex as a prognostic marker in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;13:257–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1998.01553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tartakovsky F, Worman HJ. Detection of Gp210 autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis using a recombinant protein containing the predominant autoepitope. Hepatology. 1995;21:495–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mattalia A, Luttig B, Rosina F, Leung PS, Van de Water J, Bauducci M, et al. Persistence of autoantibodies against recombinant mitochondrial and nuclear pore proteins after orthotopic liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis. Journal of autoimmunity. 1997;10:491–497. doi: 10.1006/jaut.1997.0156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Miyachi K, Shibata M, Onozuka Y, Kikuchi F, Imai N, Horigome T. Primary biliary cirrhosis sera recognize not only gp210 but also proteins of the p62 complex bearing N-acetylglucosamine residues from rat liver nuclear envelope. Anti-p62 complex antibody in PBC. Mol Biol Rep. 1996;23:227–234. doi: 10.1007/BF00351173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Luettig B, Boeker KH, Schoessler W, Will H, Loges S, Schmidt E, et al. The antinuclear autoantibodies Sp100 and gp210 persist after orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1998;28:824–828. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(98)80233-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nakamura M, Kondo H, Mori T, Komori A, Matsuyama M, Ito M, et al. Anti-gp210 and anti-centromere antibodies are different risk factors for the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;45:118–127. doi: 10.1002/hep.21472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nakamura M, Shimizu-Yoshida Y, Takii Y, Komori A, Yokoyama T, Ueki T, et al. Antibody titer to gp210-C terminal peptide as a clinical parameter for monitoring primary biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2005;42:386–392. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Liu H, Norman GL, Shums Z, Worman HJ, Krawitt EL, Bizzaro N, et al. PBC screen: an IgG/IgA dual isotype ELISA detecting multiple mitochondrial and nuclear autoantibodies specific for primary biliary cirrhosis. Journal of autoimmunity. 2010;35:436–442. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2010.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Muratori P, Muratori L, Ferrari R, Cassani F, Bianchi G, Lenzi M, et al. Characterization and clinical impact of antinuclear antibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:431–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schwarz-Herion K, Maco B, Sauder U, Fahrenkrog B. Domain topology of the p62 complex within the 3-D architecture of the nuclear pore complex. J Mol Biol. 2007;370:796–806. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Guan T, Muller S, Klier G, Pante N, Blevitt JM, Haner M, et al. Structural analysis of the p62 complex, an assembly of O-linked glycoproteins that localizes near the central gated channel of the nuclear pore complex. Mol Biol Cell. 1995;6:1591–1603. doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.11.1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Capelson M, Doucet C, Hetzer MW. Nuclear pore complexes: guardians of the nuclear genome. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2010;75:585–597. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2010.75.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wesierska-Gadek J, Hohenuer H, Hitchman E, Penner E. Autoantibodies against nucleoporin p62 constitute a novel marker of primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:840–847. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8608894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wesierska-Gadek J, Klima A, Komina O, Ranftler C, Invernizzi P, Penner E. Characterization of autoantibodies against components of the nuclear pore complexes: high frequency of anti-p62 nucleoporin antibodies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1109:519–530. doi: 10.1196/annals.1398.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wesierska-Gadek J, Klima A, Ranftler C, Komina O, Hanover J, Invernizzi P, et al. Characterization of the antibodies to p62 nucleoporin in primary biliary cirrhosis using human recombinant antigen. J Cell Biochem. 2008;104:27–37. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ou Y, Enarson P, Rattner JB, Barr SG, Fritzler MJ. The nuclear pore complex protein Tpr is a common autoantigen in sera that demonstrate nuclear envelope staining by indirect immunofluorescence. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;136:379–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02432.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wesierska-Gadek J, Penner E, Battezzati PM, Selmi C, Zuin M, Hitchman E, et al. Correlation of initial autoantibody profile and clinical outcome in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2006;43:1135–1144. doi: 10.1002/hep.21172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Meda F, Longhi MS, Bogdanos DP, Invernizzi P, Ma Y, Mieli- Vergani G, et al. Fine specificity of anti-nup62 T-helper 1 cell (TH1) immune responses in priumary biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2009;50:S248. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Invernizzi P, Podda M, Battezzati PM, Crosignani A, Zuin M, Hitchman E, et al. Autoantibodies against nuclear pore complexes are associated with more active and severe liver disease in primary biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2001;34:366–372. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)00040-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bogdanos DP, Liaskos C, Pares A, Norman G, Rigopoulou EI, Caballeria L, et al. Anti-gp210 antibody mirrors disease severity in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;45:1583. doi: 10.1002/hep.21678. author reply-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sfakianaki O, Koulentaki M, Tzardi M, Tsangaridou E, Theodoropoulos PA, Castanas E, et al. Peri-nuclear antibodies correlate with survival in Greek primary biliary cirrhosis patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:4938–4943. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i39.4938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nakamura M, Takii Y, Ito M, Komori A, Yokoyama T, Shimizu-Yoshida Y, et al. Increased expression of nuclear envelope gp210 antigen in small bile ducts in primary biliary cirrhosis. Journal of autoimmunity. 2006;26:138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kaplan MM, Gershwin ME. Primary biliary cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1261–1273. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Neuberger J. Primary biliary cirrhosis. Lancet. 1997;350:875–879. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)05419-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Neuberger J. Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis: indications and risk of recurrence. J Hepatol. 2003;39:142–148. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(03)00283-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Neuberger J. Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis. Autoimmunity reviews. 2003;2:1–7. doi: 10.1016/s1568-9972(02)00103-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Dubel L, Farges O, Courvalin JC, Sebagh M, Johanet C. Persistence of gp210 and multiple nuclear dots antibodies does not correlate with recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis 6 years after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 1998;28:169–170. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(98)80220-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Shimoda S, Nakamura M, Ishibashi H, Kawano A, Kamihira T, Sakamoto N, et al. Molecular mimicry of mitochondrial and nuclear autoantigens in primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1915–1925. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00387-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

