Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1986 Apr 11;14(7):3137–3142. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.7.3137

Evidence for transcription and potential translation of the human 1.9 kb HindIII repetitive element.

B A Citron, P V Chaudary, D N Rao, S Kaufman
PMCID: PMC339726  PMID: 3008108

Abstract

Recombinant cDNA clones corresponding to the human 1.9kb HindIII repetitive element have been isolated from a cDNA library of liver cytoplasmic polyadenylated RNA. These cDNAs share 95% homology with the reported genomic DNA sequence and a similar amount of homology at the amino acid level with putative coding sequences (see preceding article by Mottez et al). They were isolated as two of four false positives from a human cDNA library in lambda gt11 and were selected with an antibody to an unrelated enzyme. These results provide direct evidence that this repetitive element is transcribed to form poly(A)+ RNA which could be translatable. Also, these observations may add to our understanding of the sources of false positives which are frequently observed in screens of cDNA libraries with antibodies as probes.

Full text

PDF
3137

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennetzen J. L., Hall B. D. Codon selection in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1982 Mar 25;257(6):3026–3031. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Darnell J. E., Jr Variety in the level of gene control in eukaryotic cells. Nature. 1982 Jun 3;297(5865):365–371. doi: 10.1038/297365a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haynes S. R., Toomey T. P., Leinwand L., Jelinek W. R. The Chinese hamster Alu-equivalent sequence: a conserved highly repetitious, interspersed deoxyribonucleic acid sequence in mammals has a structure suggestive of a transposable element. Mol Cell Biol. 1981 Jul;1(7):573–583. doi: 10.1128/mcb.1.7.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jelinek W. R., Schmid C. W. Repetitive sequences in eukaryotic DNA and their expression. Annu Rev Biochem. 1982;51:813–844. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.004121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kanehisa M., Fickett J. W., Goad W. B. A relational database system for the maintenance and verification of the Los Alamos sequence library. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):149–158. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kwok S. C., Ledley F. D., DiLella A. G., Robson K. J., Woo S. L. Nucleotide sequence of a full-length complementary DNA clone and amino acid sequence of human phenylalanine hydroxylase. Biochemistry. 1985 Jan 29;24(3):556–561. doi: 10.1021/bi00324a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lerman M. I., Thayer R. E., Singer M. F. Kpn I family of long interspersed repeated DNA sequences in primates: polymorphism of family members and evidence for transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(13):3966–3970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.13.3966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Manuelidis L., Biro P. A. Genomic representation of the Hind II 1.9 kb repeated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 May 25;10(10):3221–3239. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.10.3221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Manuelidis L. Nucleotide sequence definition of a major human repeated DNA, the Hind III 1.9 kb family. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 May 25;10(10):3211–3219. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.10.3211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Manuelidis L., Ward D. C. Chromosomal and nuclear distribution of the HindIII 1.9-kb human DNA repeat segment. Chromosoma. 1984;91(1):28–38. doi: 10.1007/BF00286482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Martinez H. M. An efficient method for finding repeats in molecular sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Jul 11;11(13):4629–4634. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.13.4629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):499–560. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Orgel L. E., Crick F. H. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 1980 Apr 17;284(5757):604–607. doi: 10.1038/284604a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Queen C., Wegman M. N., Korn L. J. Improvements to a program for DNA analysis: a procedure to find homologies among many sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Jan 11;10(1):449–456. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.1.449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Staden R. An interactive graphics program for comparing and aligning nucleic acid and amino acid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 May 11;10(9):2951–2961. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.9.2951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wetlaufer D. B., Ristow S. Acquisition of three-dimensional structure of proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1973;42:135–158. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.42.070173.001031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yarus M., Folley L. S. Sense codons are found in specific contexts. J Mol Biol. 1985 Apr 20;182(4):529–540. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90239-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Young R. A., Davis R. W. Efficient isolation of genes by using antibody probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Mar;80(5):1194–1198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.5.1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES