Skip to main content
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery logoLink to Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
. 2012 May 9;15(2):266–272. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs068

In patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery excision, what is the best way to locate a subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodule in order to achieve successful excision?

Mahvash Zaman a, Haris Bilal b, Chui Yen Woo a, Augustine Tang c,*
PMCID: PMC3397726  PMID: 22572410

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was ‘In patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) excision, what is the best way to locate a subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodule (PN) in order to achieve successful excision?’ Altogether, 107 papers were found using the reported search, of which 19 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers were tabulated. The hook-wire technique showed a varied success rate ranging from 58 to 97.6% and a relatively higher failure rate due to wire dislodgement. The most common complication of this method was pneumothorax. CT-guided spiral-wire localization displayed a success rate of 86% with the added advantage of providing more stability than the hook-wire technique and permitting manipulation. Radio-guided localization techniques and fluoroscopic-aided methods using contrast media displayed consistently high sensitivities with few complications. The radio-guided technique had the benefit of allowing a longer time-period between the staining of the nodule and the operation. Ultrasonography showed sensitivities ranging from 92.6 to 100%; however, it is highly operator-dependent. Finger palpation was shown to achieve suboptimal results and should be avoided. We concluded that radio-guided surgery is a preferable method. It showed high accuracy with minimal complications and operator dependence in detecting subcentimetre PNs when compared with other techniques such as ultrasonography, finger palpation, fluoroscopic, hook-wire, spiral-wire and microcoil localization.

Keywords: Review, Solitary pulmonary nodule, Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, Localization technique

INTRODUCTION

A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. This is fully described in the ICVTS [1].

THREE-PART QUESTION

In patients undergoing [video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) excision], what is the best way to locate a [subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN)] in order to achieve [successful excision]?

CLINICAL SCENARIO

You are in clinic with a 40-year old ex-smoker with a history of mild haemoptysis. He has had negative findings on sputum cytology, CXR and fiberoptic bronchoscopy. He has undergone a thorax CT scan which shows and is reported as a subcentimetre SPN on the right upper lobe of an indeterminate nature; however, there is no mediastinal lymphadenopathy and the abdomen is normal. Upon performing a PET scan, the lesion has an SUV Max of 6.9. After discussing the findings, due to a strong family history of cancer, the patient would prefer to have the nodule excised rather to be kept under CT surveillance. You discuss the operation via the VATS technique and the possibility of not being able to localize the nodule; subsequently, a mini-thoracotomy is considered. The patient is otherwise healthy with normal respiratory function. You are unsure as to what would be the best method to locate the nodule and decide to check the literature.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Medline 1990 to August 2011 using the OVID interface:

[video assisted thoracoscopic surgery/OR VATs.mp.] AND [pulmonary nodule/OR solitary pulmonary nodule.mp] AND [localisation technique/OR localization technique.mp]

SEARCH OUTCOME

One hundred and seven papers were found using the reported search. From these, 19 papers were identified that provided the best evidence to answer the question. These are presented in Table 1.

Table 1:

Best evidence papers

Author, date, journal and country
Study type (level of evidence)
Patient group Outcome(s) Results Comments/weaknesses
Powell et al. (2004), Ann Surg, Canada [13]

Human phase I trial
(level 2b)
CT-guided localization using microcoils combined with fluoroscopic visualization

n = 12

Included: growing PNs <20 mm in maximum diameter in peripheral lung
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Mean time for coil insertion

Number of patients with complications
11.8 ± 3.2 mm

100%

42 ± 16 min


2 (16.7%)—1 pneumothorax, 1 small haemothorax (asymptomatic)
- VAT resection of the nodules was successful in all patients

- Safe, effective, fast technique

- Very small sample size, single institute-based study
Mayo et al. (2009), Radiology, Canada [14]

Prospective cohort study
(level 2b)
CT-guided localization using microcoils

n = 69 (30 males, 39 females, mean age: 60.7 ± 10.1 years)

Included: PN >30 mm, located in peripheral lung tissue
Success rate

Mean nodule size

Complications



Conversion to thoracotomy
97%

12.4 ± 4.5 mm

3 patients (4%)—2 pneumothorax requiring a chest tube, 1 haemothorax

2 patients (3%)—endostapler could not be closed around PN
- Microcoil technique more successful than non-guided approach (97 vs. 54%)

- Low rates of procedural complications (coil displacement—3%)

- Study limited by all resections performed at one centre by three surgeons, one experienced radiologist performed all localizations, 73 procedures but 69 patients—some had multiple lesions
Eichfeld et al. (2005), Ann Thorac Surg, Germany [15]

Prospective cohort study
(level 2b)
CT-guided spiral-wire localization

n = 22 (14 males, 8 females, average age: 60.4 years)
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Average procedure time

Complications



Conversion to thoracotomy
8 mm (range: 2–22)

86%

24 min


14 patients had a small pneumothorax not requiring any intervention (64%)

3 patients (14%)—intubation problems, pleural adhesions and dislocated wire
- Main advantages were low complication rate, short duration, safe and stable fixation of the nodule (spiral wire is more stable than a hook wire and also allows manipulation)

- Small sample size, lack of experience using the technique
Miyoshi et al. (2009), Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, Japan [2]

Retrospective cohort study
(level 2b)
CT-guided short hook-wire and suture marking system

n = 108 (44 males, 64 females, mean age: 59.1 years)

Selection for localization based on: Lesion diameter ≤10 mm, distance from pleural surface >5 mm, lesion mostly comprising ground glass appearance
Success rate

Missing events (missing unresected lesion or hook wire)

Number of patients with complications
93.6%

8 (6.4%) missing events—5 unresected lesions, 3 hook wires not recovered

5 (4.5%)—4 pneumothorax, 1 displacement of hook wire
- Showed reasonable clinical outcomes regardless of the lesion characteristics

- Retrospective study, short hook wire provides less anchoring power for traction on lung tissue compared with long

Pittet et al. (2007), World J Surg, Switzerland [3]

CT-guided localization using suture hook-wire system

Nodule size

<10 mm in 68% (range: 2–20 mm)

- Hook-wire system shown to be successful, quick and low complication rate

Retrospective cohort study
(level 2b)
n = 45 (23 males, 22 females, average age: 58 years)

Excluded: PN in direct contact with pleura, PN >1 and <1 cm beneath pleural surface
Success rate

Average procedure time

Complications


Conversion to thoracotomy
96%

50 min


3 patients (6%)—1 haemothorax, 2 pneumonia

2 patients (4%)—not possible to resect lesion by VATS
- Possible reduced procedure-related costs as duration of general anaesthesia reduced due to hook-wire being placed under local anaesthesia

- Retrospective study, single institute-based, bilateral resection performed in 4 patients

Dendo et al. (2002), Radiology, Japan [4]

Retrospective cohort study
(level 2b)
Localization using short hook-wire and suture system

n = 150 (71 males, 79 females, mean age: 61.8 years)

Group A1: Patients at institution A with procedure performed in 1993–1996
Group A2: Patients at institution A with procedure performed in 1996–2000
Group B: Patients at institution B with procedure performed in 1998–2000
Mean nodule size


Success rate


Complications
A1—9.4 ± 6.8 mm
A2—11.0 ± 4.8 mm
B—10.6 ± 6.5 mm
97.6%
(A1—92%, A2—100%, B—98%)
Pneumothorax—32.1%
Pulmonary
haemorrhage—14.8%
Haemothorax—0.6%
- Usefulness of short hook-wire and suture system affirmed by high success rate, applicability to multiple lesions and patient comfort

- 168 procedures yet 150 patients—some had multiple lesions
Ciriaco et al. (2004), Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, Italy [5]

Retrospective cohort study
(level 2b)
CT-guided hook-wire localization

n = 53

Included: PN was not apical/diaphragmatic, size <10 mm, distance from pleural surface >15 mm
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Average procedure time

Complications




Conversion to thoracotomy
16 ± 6 mm (range: 5–28)

58%

40 ± 7 min


Pneumothorax in 4 patients (7.5%), hook-wire dislodgement in 4 patients (7.5%)

4 patients (7.5%)
Reasons: impossibility to localize PN, pleural adhesions, local enucleation
- Preoperative hook wire is an effective technique when the PN size is <10 mm and distance is >15 mm. Permitted a VATS resection that otherwise would not have been possible due to size or PN/distance from pleural surface

- Retrospective analysis, single-institution-based study
Chen et al. (2007), J Formos Med Assoc, Taiwan [6]

Retrospective cohort study
(level 2b)
CT-guided hook-wire localization

n = 41 (20 males, 21 females, mean age: 52.5 ± 5.1 years)
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Mean localization time

Complications
9.7 ± 1.6 mm

95%

30.4 ± 2.8 min


8 minimal pneumothoraces (18.6%), 6 minimal haemorrhages (13.9%), 1 haemothorax (2.3%), 3 hook-wire dislodgement (7%)
- Hook-wire localization helps precise lesion identification and may serve as a traction device to lift up the lung for wedge resection

- Retrospective study, included foreign body removal rather than PN in 3 patients, 2 patients had 2 nodules removed
Gonfiotti et al. (2007), Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, Italy [7] Hook-wire vs. radio-guided surgery Mean nodule size Group A: 11 mm
Group B: 11 mm
- No statistical significance between the two groups in locating the nodule, both far superior compared with finger palpation




Prospective randomized study
(level 1b)
n = 50 (32 males, 18 females, average age: 56.3 years)

Group A (hook wire): 25
Group B (radio-guided using Tc-99): 25
Finger palpation tried in both groups

Included: Nodule maximum diameter <20 mm, distance from nearest pleural surface 1.5–3 cm, consent

Excluded: Multiple nodules, mediastinal lymphedenopathy, suspicion of metastases
Success rate






Average procedure time



Number of patients with complications
Group A:
Hook wire—84% Palpation—28%
Group B:
Radio-guided—96%
Palpation—24%


Group A: 41 min (range: 24–98)
Group B: 43 min (range: 20–85)

Group A: 6 (24%) cases of pneumothorax
Group B: 1 (4%) case of pneumothorax


- Radio-guided had fewer complications and failures. Hook-wire demonstrated complications linked primarily to external technical factors

- Small sample size, single institute
Burdine et al. (2002), Chest, USA [11]

Prospective cohort study
(level 2b)
CT-guided localization using radiolabelled technetium

n = 17
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Complications
9.2 ± 3.7 mm

100%

1 pneumothorax (6%)
- The use of a radiolabelled marker precluded conversion to thoracotomy

- Limited information on patient characteristics, all patients had known malignancies, very small study sample
Chella et al. (2000), Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, Italy [12]

Prospective cohort study
(level 2b)
Radio-guided localization using technetium-99

n = 39 (27 males, 12 females, average age: 60.8 years)

Included: Patients with PNs <20 mm in maximum diameter for at least 5 mm from visceral pleura
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Average procedure time

Complications
8.3 mm (range: 4–19)

100%

130 min (range: 60–190)


6 cases of asymptomatic pneumothorax (16%)
- Radio-guided localization by gamma-probe allows the detection and excision of small nodules in an easy and safe way, with minimal complications and a high success rate

- Single institute, small sample size
Watanabe et al. (2006), J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, Japan [18]

Prospective cohort study
(level 2b)
Fluoroscopic-assisted resection using lipiodol

n = 174 (average age: 62 ± 11 years)

Included: nodules < 10 mm, ground glass opacity lesions
Excluded: nodules >30 mm, nodules within inner two-thirds of lung, nodules >10 mm and within 10 mm from pleural surface
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Complications 
10 ± 6 mm

100%

Chest pain requiring analgesia—16 patients (11%), haemosputum—11 patients (6%), pneumothorax—30 patients (17%), haemopneumothorax—1 patient (0.6%)
- Lipiodol is a safe and inexpensive procedure for localizing small PNs for VATS resection

- Complications associated with insertion of the needle rather than the lipiodol itself
Moon et al. (1999), Ann Thorac Surg, Korea [19]

Retrospective cohort study
(level 2b)
Fluoroscopic-aided resection using contrast media

n = 28 (15 males, 13 females, average age: 53 years)

23 patients had solitary nodules, 5 had multiple nodules
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Average procedure time

Complications
17 ± 7.6 mm

100%

27.5 ± 11 min


4 minor complications related to CT localization
- Water-insoluble contrast media enable better imaging of nodule as they do not diffuse

- Apart from lengthy CT time and time concomitant of portable fluoroscopy personnel, method is safe and effective

- Small sample size, study included patients with multiple nodules
Nomori et al. (2002), Ann Thorac Surg, Japan [20]

Retrospective cohort study
(level 2b)
Fluoroscopy-assisted resection using lipiodol and coloured collagen

n = 16 (10 males, 6 females, age range: 45–79 years)
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Complications
7 mm (range: 4–10)

100%

1 case of pneumothorax (6%)
- Marking procedure using both lipiodol and coloured collagen (atelocollagen and methylene blue) can localize small and deeply situated PNs safely and successfully

- Small sample size, retrospective study, single institute-based results, does not specify exact inclusion/exclusion criteria
Lenglinger et al. (1994), Am J Roentgenol, Austria [16]

Prospective cohort study
(level 2b)
Methylene blue staining

n = 15 (9 males, 6 females, average age: 60 years)

Only CT was used to guide all localizations
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Average procedure time

Complications





Conversion to thoracotomy
16 mm (range: 8–33)

100%

32 min (range: 18–47)


Pulmonary haemorrhage—3 patients (20%),
pneumothorax—5 patients (33%), no adverse reactions to dye

4 patients (27%)—1 due to haemorrhage, 1 for lobectomy treatment, 2 problems with technical devices
- Staining of PNs before VATs is an accurate technique for localization, less costly than placement of hook wires, and obviates wire-related complications

- Use of methylene blue may be limited in patients with extensive anthracotic pigmentation

- Very small sample size
McConnell et al. (2002), J Pediatr Surg, USA [17]

Retrospective cohort study
(level 2b)
Methylene blue staining using autologous blood

n = 17 (average age: 11 years)
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Average procedure time

Complications
9 mm (range: 3–38)

100%

70 min


1 patient conversion to thoracotomy due to stapler malfunction (6%)
- Using methylene blue with autologous blood binder provides accurate localization several hours after injecting nodule

- Small sample size, all sample children, more nodules resected than were localized preoperatively (study not based on solitary nodules), retrospective study
Piolanti et al. (2003), Eur Radiol, Italy [21]

Prospective cohort study
(level 2b)
Ultrasonography

n = 35 (23 males, 12 females, age range: 18–75 years)
Mean nodule size

Success rate

Complications not reported
13.2 ± 5.9 mm

92.6%
- Showed good sensitivity, affordable localization technique, non-invasive, no exposure to radiation

- Requires skilled ultrasound operator

- Small sample size, single institute-based study
Matsumoto et al. (2004), Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, Japan [10]

Prospective cohort study
(level 2b)
Ultrasonography during VATS vs. video imaging and palpation

n = 23 (14 males, 9 females, average size: 61.8 years)

Included: patients with nodules located in the peripheral lung, <30 mm in diameter on CT, no definitive diagnosis
Overall success rate for each nodule

Average time for ultrasonography during VATS

Complications
Ultrasonography: 100%
Palpation: 88%
Video image: 60%
7 min



None reported
- For nodules <10 mm on CT scan, the detection rate by ultrasonography was significantly higher than by video imaging (P = 0.012)
Santambrogio et al. (1999), Ann Thorac Surg, Italy [22]

Prospective cohort study
(level 2b)
Ultrasonography

n = 18 (12 males, 6 females, average age: 63 ± 11 years)

Included: Patients with deep nodules <20 mm without a definitive diagnosis
Success rate

Mean nodule size

Average procedure time

Complications
100%

13.9 ± 4.4 mm

10 ± 4 min


None reported
- Thoracoscopic ultrasound is a difficult technique requiring experience; however, it can quickly, safely and effectively localize solitary nodules

- Small sample size

RESULTS

Several techniques for the localization of SPN were described and are well known in their positive or negative aspects: finger palpation, intraoperative ultrasound, hook-wire, spiral-wire, fluoroscopic and radio-guided detection are most commonly used.

The hook-wire technique showed a sensitivity ranging from 58 to 97.6% in various studies [27] and a relatively higher failure rate due to the dislodgment of the wire reaching up to 47% [79]. Commonly associated complications such as pneumothorax were fewest with the short hook-wire technique used by Miyoshi et al. [2]. In the only randomized trial comparing techniques of localization, Gonfiotti et al. [7] simultaneously reviewed the radio-guided surgery technique using technetium-99 against the radio-guided hook-wire technique in 50 patients. The technetium-99 group had a better success rate at 96% compared with the hook-wire technique group at 84%. However, this was not a statistically significant difference. Finger palpation was also carried out in both subgroups; however, the radio-guided and hook-wire techniques were found to be far superior (96 vs. 24% and 84 vs. 28%, respectively). In addition, finger palpation achieved suboptimal results in the study carried out by Matsumoto et al. [10]. Finger palpation for subcentimetre nodules during VATS resection is not advisable as small port size and operator dependence make it unreliable.

Both studies that solely utilized radioactive technetium [11, 12] to localize pulmonary nodules (PNs) achieved 100% success rates. The radionuclide has a half-life of 6 h, increasing the available time frame between PN labelling and operating. Centres must have the necessary equipment and radiation protection regulations in place to offer this method of localization.

In 2004, Powell et al. [13] carried out a study involving just 12 patients with undiagnosed growing PNs of ∼12 mm mean size. These were marked preoperatively using percutaneously placed CT-guided platinum microcoils and then excised by a fluoroscopically guided VATS resection. A sensitivity of 100% was shown using this technique with all patients achieving a successful resection. Selection bias and small sample size may limit its clinical implications. With a similar technique, Mayo et al. [14] achieved a success rate of 97% and much fewer complications (4 vs. 16.7%).

Eichfeld et al. [15] used spiral-wire localization in 22 patients to localize PNs with a mean size of 8 mm and achieved an 86% success rate. The spiral-wire technique gives good stability and permits manipulation. An added advantage is that the marked nodule can be pulled towards the thoracic wall before resection, therefore allowing the exact placement of the linear stapler. Complications are fewer using the spiral-wire technique when compared with the hook-wire technique.

Methylene blue staining of the nodules produced high sensitivities [16, 17], although the studies were based on small sample sizes of 15 and 17, respectively. It provides an accurate method for localizing PNs, although the density of colouration of the target area may be affected by the time elapsed between methylene blue labelling and thoracoscopy. The use of methylene blue may also be limited in patients with anthracotic pigmentation as the dye may be difficult to see during VATS. Fluoroscopic-aided resection using contrast media also yielded high success rates [1820]. Water-insoluble contrasts such as lipiodol provide good-quality imaging of PNs even several hours after localization.

Ultrasonography demonstrated sensitivities ranging from 92.6 to 100% in localizing PNs across three studies [10, 21, 22]. This method offers a quick, more affordable, less invasive way of localizing lesions with virtually no complications reported but is highly operator-dependent and is limited by the presence of air in the lungs.

CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE

Radio-guided surgical localization is preferable to pinpoint subcentimetre nodules during VATS. In comparison with the other techniques, it offers a higher sensitivity, minimal operator dependence, minimal complications and lower risk of failures.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Dunning J, Prendergast B, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2003;2:405–9. doi: 10.1016/S1569-9293(03)00191-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miyoshi K, Toyooka S, Gobara H, Oto T, Mimura H, Sano Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of short hook wire and suture marking system in thoracoscopic resection for pulmonary nodules. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36:378–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pittet O, Christodoulou M, Pezzetta E, Schmidt S, Schnyder P, Ris HB. Video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of a small pulmonary nodule after computed tomography-guided localization with a hook-wire system. Experience in 45 consecutive patients. World J Surg. 2007;31:575–8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0343-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dendo S, Kanazawa S, Ando A, Hyodo T, Kouno Y, Yasui K, et al. Preoperative localization of small pulmonary lesions with a short hook wire and suture system: experience with 168 procedures. Radiology. 2002;225:511–8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2252011025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ciriaco P, Negri G, Puglisi A, Nicoletti R, Del Maschio A, Zannini P. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary nodules: rationale for preoperative computed tomography-guided hookwire localization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:429–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2003.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen YR, Yeow KM, Lee JY, Su IH, Chu SY, Lee CH, et al. CT-guided hook wire localization of subpleural lung lesions for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106:911–8. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60061-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gonfiotti A, Davini F, Vaggelli L, De Francisci A, Caldarella A, Gigli PM, et al. Thoracoscopic localization techniques for patients with solitary pulmonary nodule: hookwire versus radio-guided surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32:843–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bernard A. Resection of pulmonary nodules using video-assisted thoracic surgery. The Thorax Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:202–4. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mack MJ, Shennib H, Landreneau RJ, Hazelrigg SR. Techniques for localization of pulmonary nodules for thoracoscopic resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106:550–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Matsumoto S, Hirata T, Ogawa E, Fukuse T, Ueda H, Koyama T, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of small nodules in the peripheral lung during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26:469–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Burdine J, Joyce LD, Plunkett MB, Inampudi S, Kaye MG, Dunn DH. Feasibilily and value of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery wedge excision of small pulmonary nodules in patients with malignancy. Chest. 2002;122:1467–70. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.4.1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chella A, Lucchi M, Ambrogi MC, Menconi G, Melfi FM, Gonfiotti A, et al. A pilot study of the role of TC-99 radionuclide in localization of pulmonary nodular lesions for thoracoscopic resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;18:17–21. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00411-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Powell TI, Jangra D, Clifton JC, Lara-Guerra H, Church N, English J, et al. Peripheral lung nodules. Fluoroscopically guided video-assisted thoracoscopic resection after computer tomography-guided localization using platinum microcoils. Ann Surg. 2004;240:481–9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000137132.01881.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mayo JR, Clifton JC, Powell TI, English JC, Evans KG, Yee J, et al. Lung nodules: CT-guided placement of microcoils to direct video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical resection. Radiology. 2009;250:576–85. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2502080442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eichfeld U, Dietrich A, Ott R, Kloeppel R. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary nodules after computed tomography-guided marking with a spiral wire. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:313–6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lenglinger FX, Schwarz CD, Artmann W. Localization of pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic surgery: value of percutaneous staining with methylene blue. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:297–300. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.2.7518642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McConnell PI, Feola GP, Meyers RL. Methylene blue-stained autologous blood for needle localization and thoracoscopic resection of deep pulmonary nodules. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:1729–31. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.36707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Watanabe K, Nomori H, Ohtsuka T, Kaji M, Naruke T, Suemasu K. Usefulness and complications of computed tomography-guided lipiodol marking for fluoroscopy-assisted thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules: experience with 174 nodules. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:320–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moon SW, Wang YP, Jo KH, Kwack MS, Kim SW, Kwon OK, et al. Fluoroscopy-aided thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary nodule localized with contrast media. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1815–20. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00764-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nomori H, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. Fluoroscopy-assisted thoracoscopic resection of lung nodules marked with lipiodol. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:170–3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03615-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Piolanti M, Coppola F, Papa S, Pilotti V, Mattioli S, Gavelli G. Ultrasonographic localization of occult pulmonary nodules during video-assisted thoracic surgery. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2358–64. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1916-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Santambrogio R, Montorsi M, Bianchi P, Mantovani A, Ghelma F, Mezzetti M. Intraoperative ultrasound during thoracoscopic procedures for solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:218–22. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00459-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES