Skip to main content
Molecular Vision logoLink to Molecular Vision
. 2012 Jun 23;18:1719–1726.

Mutation screening of the PCDH15 gene in Spanish patients with Usher syndrome type I

Teresa Jaijo 1,2, Aki Oshima 3, Elena Aller 1,2, Carol Carney 4, Shin-ichi Usami 5, José M Millán 1,2,6,, William J Kimberling 4,7
PMCID: PMC3398493  PMID: 22815625

Abstract

Purpose

PCDH15 codes for protocadherin-15, a cell-cell adhesion protein essential in the morphogenesis and cohesion of stereocilia bundles and in the function or preservation of photoreceptor cells. Mutations in the PCDH15 gene are responsible for Usher syndrome type I (USH1F) and non-syndromic hearing loss (DFNB23). The purpose of this work was to perform PCDH15 mutation screening to identify the genetic cause of the disease in a cohort of Spanish patients with Usher syndrome type I and establish phenotype-genotype correlation.

Methods

Mutation analysis of PCDH15 included additional exons recently identified and was performed by direct sequencing. The screening was performed in 19 probands with USH already screened for mutations in the most prevalent USH1 genes, myosin VIIA (MYO7A) and cadherin-23 (CDH23), and for copy number variants in PCDH15.

Results

Seven different point mutations, five novel, were detected. Including the large PCDH15 rearrangements previously reported in our cohort of patients, a total of seven of 19 patients (36.8%) were carriers of at least one pathogenic allele. Thirteen out of the 38 screened alleles carried pathogenic PCDH15 variants (34.2%).

Conclusions

Five out of the seven point mutations reported in the present study are novel, supporting the idea that most PCDH15 mutations are private. Furthermore, no mutational hotspots have been identified. In most patients, detected mutations led to a truncated protein, reinforcing the hypothesis that severe mutations cause the Usher I phenotype and that missense variants are mainly responsible for non-syndromic hearing impairment.

Introduction

Usher syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder recognized as the most frequent cause of deaf-blindness. The frequency of Usher syndrome has been estimated to be 3.2–6.2/100,000 [1,2], in Spain 4.2/100,000 [3].

The standard clinical classification of Usher syndrome has three clinical categories, types I, II, and III [4,5]. Usher syndrome type I (USH1) is characterized by severe to profound congenital hearing impairment, vestibular dysfunction, and prepubertal onset of retinitis pigmentosa (RP); type II (USH2) displays moderate to severe hearing impairment, normal vestibular function, and teenage onset of RP. Usher syndrome type III (USH3) presents with progressive hearing loss and variable vestibular function and onset of RP.

Seven loci for USH1 have been mapped so far, and five of these genes have been identified: myosin VIIA (MYO7A, USH1B), Usher syndrome 1C (USH1C, USH1C), cadherin-23 (CDH23, USH1D), protocadherin-15 (PCDH15, USH1F), and Usher syndrome 1G (USH1G, USH1G) [6,7]. MYO7A and CDH23 are reported to be the most prevalent genes, causing 29%–55% and 19%–35% of USH1 cases, respectively [8-12]. The PCDH15 gene is involved in 11%–19% [9,11-13], whereas the remaining USH1 genes play a minor role in the disease, its prevalence lower than 10% [9,11,14,15].

PCDH15 was initially described to span 980 kb of genomic DNA, and several transcripts were identified [16]. The longest transcript (isoform A) comprised 33 exons and encoded a protein of 1,955 amino acids. Protocadherin-15 was composed of an extracellular domain with a signal peptide and 11 cadherin repeats (ectodomains, EC), a transmembrane, and a cytoplasmic domain (CD1). Ahmed et al. [17,18] characterized six additional exons: exon 11a encoding a new cadherin repeat, exons 25a (non-coding) and 25b that coded for a new 5′-UTR and a signal peptide, exon 34, and exons 35 and 36 that encoded two novel and alternative cytoplasmic domains, CD2 and CD3, respectively.

Protocadherin-15 was localized in the inner ear hair cell stereocilia and in the retinal photoreceptors [13]. This protein is important in the morphogenesis and cohesion of stereocilia bundles. Protocadherin-15 and cadherin-23 proteins interact to form tip links that connect the stereocilia in the inner hair cells and are thought to gate the mechanoelectrical transduction channel [19]. In the retina, strong expression in the photoreceptors, particularly in the outer photoreceptor segments, has been observed for protocadherin-15, suggesting a role in the function or maintenance of the photoreceptor cells [13].

Mutations in PCDH15 are responsible for USH1 and for autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss (DFNB23) [13]. To date, several PCDH15 mutation screenings have been performed, and more than 30 different point mutations have been identified as well as large rearrangements, including deletions and duplications (UMD-PCDH15 Locus Specific Database [20-22]).

In the present study, we report the results of sequence analysis of all 38 coding exons of the PCDH15 gene in 15 probands with Usher syndrome type I and four clinically non-classified USH from the Spanish population. These patients had been previously screened for mutations in MYO7A and CDH23 and for copy number variants in PCDH15.

Methods

Patients

Nineteen unrelated Spanish patients were mainly recruited from the Federación de Asociaciones de Retinosis Pigmentaria de España (FARPE) and from the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) and Ophthalmology services of Spanish hospitals.

Patients were clinically diagnosed with Usher syndrome. Fifteen were classified as USH1 based on audiological tests, vestibular function, and ophthalmologic evaluations, whereas four were non-classified because of lack of data. Audiometric examination consisted on otoscopic exploration, pure-tone audiometry, and speech audiometry. The ophthalmologic exploration included visual acuity measurements, fundus ophthalmoscopy, and visual field examination. Vestibular testing consisted of electronystagmography, gaze, and positional nystagmus. This cohort was selected because previous studies had discarded the MYO7A and CDH23 genes as responsible for the disease [10,12,23]. In most cases, samples from family members were obtained.

A set of 50 healthy unrelated Spanish samples were used as controls. The ethics committees from the Boys Town National Research Hospital and the Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria IIS - La Fe approved the present study. All the procedures used conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent for genetic testing was obtained from all participants after the nature and possible consequences of the study were explained.

Mutation screening

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood collected in EDTA tubes using an automated DNA extractor (MagNA Pure compact Instrument, Roche Applied Science, GmbH). All the 38 coding exons of the PCDH15 gene and intronic sequences flanking each exon were PCR amplified using primers listed in Appendix 1 [16,17]. Products were sequenced following the manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA), and the obtained sequences were compared with the corresponding reference sequences (NM_033056; EU718480 for CD2-isoform 1; EU718481 for CD2-isoform 2; and EU718482 for CD3) using the BLAST program. Whenever two putative pathologic variants were identified in a patient, segregation analysis was performed on all available family members to confirm the cosegregation with the disease and to determine parental origin.

Computational analysis

Splice-site variants were in silico analyzed to predict their effect on the donor and acceptor splice sites. Two programs were used: the Splice Site Prediction by Neural Network (NNSPLICE 0.9) and Spliceview.

Missense changes were studied using different programs to predict whether variants are deleterious. PolyPhen classifies an amino acid substitution as probably damaging, possibly damaging, benign, or unknown, PMut provides a binary prediction of neutral or pathologic, and SIFT predicts whether a change is tolerated or deleterious.

Results

Mutation analysis of PCDH15 in 19 unrelated Spanish patients revealed seven different point mutations, five novel, in six patients (Table 1 and Table 2). These changes included one probably pathogenic missense variant and six pathogenic mutations: one frameshift, two splice-site mutations, and three nonsense changes.

Table 1. Probable pathogenic point mutations identified in Spanish Usher I patients in the PCDH15 gene.

Nucleotide change Amino acid change Exon/ intron Number patients/ alleles SNP Domain References
Missense
c.401G>A
p.R134Q
5
1/1

EC1
[22]
Frameshift
c.1304_1305insC
p.T436YfsX12
11
1/1

EC4
This study
Splice-site
c.2868+5G>A

21
1/1

EC9
This study
c.3717+2dupT

27
1/2

EC11
This study
Nonsense
c.733C>T
p.R245X
8
1/1
rs111033260
EC2
[24]
c.1737C>G
p.Y579X
14
1/1

EC5
This study
c.2782A>T p.K928X 21 1/2 This study

In bold: Variants not previously reported.

Table 2. Segregation analysis and clinical information of Spanish patients in whom pathogenic PCDH15 mutations have been detected.

Patient Paternal allele Maternal allele Sensorineural hearing loss Vestibular function Age at diagnosis of RP Visual field Visual acuity Fundus appearance
RP-219
c.3717+2dupT
c.3717+2dupT
Congenital, profound, stable
vestibular dysfunction
2
Concentric loss <10° (17 years)
0,3 / 0,15 (17 years)
Typical RP
RP-367
c.158–52781_475–3295dup
p.R134Q
Congenital, profound, stable
vestibular dysfunction
8
Concentric loss 10° (12 years)
0,7 / 0,8 (12 years)
Typical RP + macular involvement
RP-576M
p.K928X
p.K928X
Congenital, profound, stable
ND
22
ND
0,8 / 0,7 (23 years)
Typical RP + macular involvement
RP-982
c.158–52781_475–3295dup
c.158–52781_475–3295dup
Congenital, profound, stable
vestibular dysfunction
7–8
Concentric loss. 10° (32 years)
0,6 /0,6 (32 years)
Typical RP
RP-1034
c.92–13779_157+41368del
p.R245X
Congenital, profound, stable
vestibular dysfunction
9
Concentric loss. 5° (15 years)
0,7 /0,7 (13 years)
Typical RP
RP-1286
c.1304_1305insC
+
Congenital, profound, stable
ND
9
Concentric loss (36 years)
ND
ND
RP-1323 c.2868+5G>A p.Y579X Congenital, profound ND ND ND ND RP

Age at diagnosis of RP is showed in years. ND: No data.

Segregation analysis was performed in all cases where two pathologic variants were found, and cosegregation of mutations with the disease was observed in all families.

Missense variants

One missense change, classified as probably pathogenic, was identified in this study. Variant p.R134Q (c.401G>A) located in EC1 was detected in trans in patient RP-367, carrier of a duplication of exons 4–6 in PCDH15 (family previously reported by Aller et al. [22]). The PMut and SIFT programs predicted this variant as neutral and tolerated. However, PolyPhen classified the variant as possibly damaging.

Frameshift mutation

One frameshift mutation was detected in the heterozygous state in patient RP-1286. This variant consists of the insertion of a cytosine between positions c.1304 and c.1305 of the PCDH15 gene, leading to a frameshift causing a truncated protein in the EC4 domain. This insertion is produced near the end of exon 11. Nevertheless, no effect on the splicing process was predicted by the splicing analysis programs used.

Splice site mutations

Two splicing variants were detected in our cohort of patients. c.2868+5G>A was detected in the heterozygous state in patient RP-1323, who is also a carrier of a nonsense mutation, and variant c.3717+2dupT was found homozygously in patient RP-219. Specific splicing programs showed that these variants abolished the recognition of the consensus donor splice sites.

Nonsense mutations

Three mutations causing direct stop codons were identified. The mutation p.R245X (c.733C>T) has been widely described in previous studies in patients with USH1 [24]. This variant is predicted to truncate the protein in the EC2 domain. In our cohort of patients, the variant was detected in a compound heterozygous patient, RP-1034, with the reported deletion comprising exon 3 of the PCDH15 gene [22].

The novel mutation p.Y579X (c.1737C>G) identified in patient RP-1323 causes a truncation in exon 14 encoding the EC5 domain. That variant was identified in our proband together with a splice-site mutation.

Finally, we detected the mutation p.K928X (c.2782A>T) in the homozygous state in patient RP-576M, who belongs to a consanguineous family. This mutation, located in exon 21, leads to the loss of the last three EC domains as well as the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains.

In addition to the probable pathogenic mutations listed in Table 1, 38 sequence variants were identified in our cohort of patients (Appendix 2). Eleven exonic changes were detected. Two were located in exons 35 and 36: p.E1611A (c.4832A>C) in exon 35 (protocadherin-15-CD2) and p.Q1654P (c.4961A>C) in exon 36 (protocadherin-15-CD3). The remaining 27 variants were intronic. Based upon previous studies, segregation analysis, bioinformatic predictions, and allele frequencies, these 38 variants were classified as non-pathogenic.

Clinical data from patients with at least one clear pathologic mutation are shown in Table 2. In PCDH15 patients for whom detailed clinical information was obtained, a typical Usher syndrome type I phenotype was observed. They were diagnosed with profound sensorineural hearing impairment before 1 year of age, and at least in three cases vestibular dysfunction was present. The age at diagnosis of RP occurred before 10 years, with the exception of patient RP-576M, who showed the first symptoms of the disease at the age of 22. Eye fundus revealed attenuation of vessels, waxy pallor of the optic nerve head, and bone spicules deposits (typical RP). Two patients also had macular involvement. The visual field loss was concentric, and the degree of visual acuity ranged from 0.15 to 0.8, depending on the age at ophthalmological evaluation and the degree of progression of the disease.

Discussion

In the present report, we describe the results obtained from the mutation screening of the PCDH15 gene in a series of 19 Spanish patients with USH in whom MYO7A and CDH23 had been previously discarded as disease-causative. This study includes the analysis of the additional coding exons as well as the results of the screening of large rearrangements involving PCDH15 previously reported [22].

Seven different point mutations were detected, two in the homozygous state. Including the large deletion and duplication detected in our patients with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Comparative Genomic Hybidization (CGH) array [22], seven patients were carriers of at least one pathologic variant (36.8%). Thirteen pathologic PCDH15 alleles out of the 38 screened alleles were detected (34.2%).

All detected mutations have a clear pathogenic effect with the exception of the missense variant p.R134Q. It has been considered probable pathogenic because it was not detected in control samples and because it was found in trans together with a large PCDH15 duplication. Mutation p.R134G was described as responsible for non-syndromic recessive deafness in two consanguineous families from Pakistan [13,17]. This may indicate an important role for the amino acid R134 in the protein.

Two missense variants, p.N174S and p.R1273S, were detected in very low frequency (see Appendix 2). The novel variant p.N174S was identified in one allele of patient RP-1321, also a carrier of variant p.Q1496H (classified as pathogenic) located in the CDH23 gene [12]. Both genes are located in the same chromosome (PCDH15 in 10q21.1 and CDH23 in 10q22.3). Segregation analysis was performed in this family, and we observed that both missense variants were located in cis. These results do not support a possible digenic inheritance between CDH23 and PCDH15 in this family. The PCDH15 change was not detected in control chromosomes, but bioinformatic tools do not suggest a pathologic effect of this variant. In view of these results, we considered the PCDH15 variant p.N174S probably non-pathogenic.

Regarding variant p.R1273S, it was identified in the heterozygous state in patient RP-1387. Bioinformatic analyses showed different results, classifying this change as neutral (PMut), tolerated (SIFT), and probably damaging (PolyPhen). The change was not found in 100 control chromosomes, and the loss of a positive charge at position 1273 of the protein could affect the structure and interactions of protocadherin-15. However, a second PCDH15 mutation was not detected. Bonnet et al. [25] reported this variant in the heterozygous state in one patient with USH1 with the second mutated allele remaining undetected. The authors classified p.R1273S as presumably pathogenic. However, we considered this change a presumed non-pathogenic variant.

Pathogenic variants were not detected in the additional PCDH15 exons. Two missense changes were identified, p.E1611A (located in exon 35, CD2) and p.Q1654P (exon 36, CD3). Whereas the protocadherin-15-CD1 has a restricted expression profile, a wider pattern of expression was observed in protocadherin-15-CD2 and -CD3 [17]. To date, no mutation has been reported in the additional exons. This could be due to the small sample size screened for mutations or because mutations in these isoforms do not cause Usher syndrome but perhaps other disorders.

No mutational hotspots or recurrent mutations have been identified in the PCDH15 gene, with the exception of p.R245X, a founder mutation responsible for about 50%–60% of Usher syndrome type I cases in the Ashkenazi Jewish population [24,26].

Despite the exhaustive screening of PCDH15, including the direct sequencing of all coding exons from known isoforms and including a search for large rearrangements, only one heterozygous mutation, c.1304_1305insC, was identified in patient RP-1286. Technical errors or hidden mutations in gene regions such as introns or regulatory sequences may account for this case. This patient may also be a carrier of a variant in PCDH15, and two causative mutations may be located in some other USH gene. However, we calculated that there was only a 0.0046 probability that this case is a happenstance carrier [27].

PCDH15 mutations were detected in seven patients. All were referred to as USH1, although detailed clinical data were obtained from only six, supporting their clinical diagnosis. Mutations in PCDH15 are responsible for Usher syndrome type I (USH1F) and DFNB23. Previous studies suggest an association of hypomorphic alleles with DFNB23 due to the conservation of residual function sufficient for normal vision but not for hearing, while severe mutations are USH1 causative [13,28]. In our cohort of patients, most of the detected pathologic variants were truncating mutations. Only in patient RP-367 was a missense variant identified in trans together with a large duplication, in whom a clear USH1 diagnosis was established. Ahmed et al. [13,17] described DFNB23 families homozygous for variant p.R134G. The phenotypic differences could be due to the second mutation (a rearrangement leading to a truncated protein in our patient with USH1), or that the missense variants had different effects on protein.

A better understanding of the consequences of PCDH15 mutations within the different isoforms and tissues where the mutations are expressed will help shed light on which functions are conserved or damaged causing different phenotypes as USH1 or DFNB23. This knowledge will be helpful in developing therapies for these diseases.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to the patients participating in the study and to their family members, and also to FARPE for their help and co-operation. This work was supported by grants PI07/0558 and PI08/90311 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. CIBERER is an initiative of the Institute of Health Carlos III from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. In the USA, the research was supported by grants from Foundation Fighting Blindness (BR-GE-0606–0343), the National Institute of Deafness and other Communication Disorders (P01 DC01813). This study was presented as a poster at the 6th Molecular Biology of Hearing & Deafness Conference (UK, 11–14 July, 2007) and the European Human Genetics Conference (31 May – 3 June 2008 Barcelona, Spain).

Appendix 1. Primers to sequence the PCDH15 gene.

To access the data, click or select the words “Appendix 1.” This will initiate the download of a compressed (pdf) archive that contains the file. The melting temperature used to amplify these fragments was 55 °C. aPrimers previously described by Ahmed et al. [16]. bPrimers modified from Ahmed et al. [16]. cPrimers previously described by Ahmed et al. [17]. dPrimers described in the present study.

Appendix 2. Presumed non-pathogenic alterations found in PCDH15.

To access the data, click or select the words “Appendix 2.” This will initiate the download of a compressed (pdf) archive that contains the file. NV: Variants not previously described. *: Nomenclature based on the protocadherin-15-CD2 (EU718480). **: Nomenclature based on the protocadherin-15-CD3 (EU718482). Variant c.986–81C>T has been previously described [11], but no SNP number has been assigned.

References

  • 1.Keats BJ, Corey DP. The usher syndromes. Am J Med Genet. 1999;89:158–66. Review. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cohen M, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Luxon L. The changing face of Usher syndrome: clinical implications. Int J Audiol. 2007;46:82–93. doi: 10.1080/14992020600975279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Espinós C, Millán JM, Beneyto M, Nájera C. Epidemiology of Usher syndrome in Valencia and Spain. Community Genet. 1998;1:223–8. doi: 10.1159/000016167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smith RJ, Berlin CI, Hejtmancik JF, Keats BJ, Kimberling WJ, Lewis RA, Möller CG, Pelias MZ, Tranebjaerg L. Clinical diagnosis of the Usher syndromes. Usher Syndrome Consortium. Am J Med Genet. 1994;50:32–8. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320500107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kimberling WJ, Möller C. Clinical and molecular genetics of Usher syndrome. J Am Acad Audiol. 1995;6:63–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Saihan Z, Webster AR, Luxon L, Bitner-Glindzicz M. Update on Usher syndrome. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009;22:19–27. doi: 10.1097/wco.0b013e3283218807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Millán JM, Aller E, Jaijo T, Blanco-Kelly F, Gimenez-Pardo A, Ayuso C. An update on the genetics of usher syndrome. J Ophthalmol. 2011;2011:417217. doi: 10.1155/2011/417217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bharadwaj AK, Kasztejna JP, Huq S, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Evaluation of the myosin VIIA gene and visual function in patients with Usher syndrome type I. Exp Eye Res. 2000;71:173–81. doi: 10.1006/exer.2000.0863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ouyang XM, Yan D, Du LL, Hejtmancik JF, Jacobson SG, Nance WE, Li AR, Angeli S, Kaiser M, Newton V, Brown SD, Balkany T, Liu XZ. Characterization of Usher syndrome type I gene mutations in an Usher syndrome patient population. Hum Genet. 2005;116:292–9. doi: 10.1007/s00439-004-1227-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jaijo T, Aller E, Oltra S, Beneyto M, Nájera C, Ayuso C, Baiget M, Carballo M, Antiñolo G, Valverde D, Moreno F, Vilela C, Perez-Garrigues H, Navea A, Millán JM. Mutation profile of the MYO7A gene in Spanish patients with Usher syndrome type I. Hum Mutat. 2006;27:290–1. doi: 10.1002/humu.9404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roux AF, Faugère V, Le Guédard S, Pallares-Ruiz N, Vielle A, Chambert S, Marlin S, Hamel C, Gilbert B, Malcolm S, Claustres M, French Usher Syndrome Collaboration Survey of the frequency of USH1 gene mutations in a cohort of Usher patients shows the importance of cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 genes and establishes a detection rate of above 90%. J Med Genet. 2006;43:763–8. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.041954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Oshima A, Jaijo T, Aller E, Millan JM, Carney C, Usami S, Moller C, Kimberling WJ. Mutation profile of the CDH23 gene in 56 probands with Usher syndrome type I. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:E37–46. doi: 10.1002/humu.20761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ahmed ZM, Riazuddin S, Ahmad J, Bernstein SL, Guo Y, Sabar MF, Sieving P, Riazuddin S, Griffith AJ, Friedman TB, Belyantseva IA, Wilcox ER. PCDH15 is expressed in the neurosensory epithelium of the eye and ear and mutant alleles are responsible for both USH1F and DFNB23. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:3215–23. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aller E, Jaijo T, Beneyto M, Nájera C, Morera C, Pérez-Garrigues H, Ayuso C, Millán J. Screening of the USH1G gene among Spanish patients with Usher syndrome. Lack of mutations and evidence of a minor role in the pathogenesis of the syndrome. Ophthalmic Genet. 2007;28:151–5. doi: 10.1080/13816810701537374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aparisi MJ, García-García G, Jaijo T, Rodrigo R, Graziano C, Seri M, Simsek T, Simsek E, Bernal S, Baiget M, Pérez-Garrigues H, Aller E, Millán JM. Novel mutations in the USH1C gene in Usher syndrome patients. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2948–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ahmed ZM, Riazuddin S, Bernstein SL, Ahmed Z, Khan S, Griffith AJ, Morell RJ, Friedman TB, Riazuddin S, Wilcox ER. Mutations of the protocadherin gene PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:25–34. doi: 10.1086/321277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ahmed ZM, Riazuddin S, Aye S, Ali RA, Venselaar H, Anwar S, Belyantseva PP, Qasim M, Riazuddin S, Friedman TB. Gene structure and mutant alleles of PCDH15: nonsyndromic deafness DFNB23 and type 1 Usher syndrome. Hum Genet. 2008;124:215–23. doi: 10.1007/s00439-008-0543-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ahmed ZM, Goodyear R, Riazuddin S, Lagziel A, Legan PK, Behra M, Burgess SM, Lilley KS, Wilcox ER, Riazuddin S, Griffith AJ, Frolenkov GI, Belyantseva IA, Richardson GP, Friedman TB. The tip-link antigen, a protein associated with the transduction complex of sensory hair cells, is protocadherin-15. J Neurosci. 2006;26:7022–34. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1163-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kazmierczak P, Sakaguchi H, Tokita J, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Milligan RA, Müller U, Kachar B. Cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 interact to form tip-link filaments in sensory hair cells. Nature. 2007;449:87–91. doi: 10.1038/nature06091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Baux D, Faugère V, Larrieu L, Le Guédard-Méreuze S, Hamroun D, Béroud C, Malcolm S, Claustres M, Roux AF. UMD-USHbases: a comprehensive set of databases to record and analyse pathogenic mutations and unclassified variants in seven Usher syndrome causing genes. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:E76–87. doi: 10.1002/humu.20780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Le Guédard S, Faugère V, Malcolm S, Claustres M, Roux AF. Large genomic rearrangements within the PCDH15 gene are a significant cause of USH1F syndrome. Mol Vis. 2007;13:102–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aller E, Jaijo T, García-García G, Aparisi MJ, Blesa D, Díaz-Llopis M, Ayuso C, Millán JM. Identification of large rearrangements of the PCDH15 gene by combined MLPA and a CGH: large duplications are responsible for Usher syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:5480–5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jaijo T, Aller E, Beneyto M, Najera C, Graziano C, Turchetti D, Seri M, Ayuso C, Baiget M, Moreno F, Morera C, Perez-Garrigues H, Millán JM. MYO7A mutation screening in Usher syndrome type I patients from diverse origins. J Med Genet. 2007;44:e71. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.045377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ben-Yosef T, Ness SL, Madeo AC, Bar-Lev A, Wolfman JH, Ahmed ZM, Desnick RJ, Willner JP, Avraham KB, Ostrer H, Oddoux C, Griffith AJ, Friedman TB. A mutation of PCDH15 among Ashkenazi Jews with the type 1 Usher syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1664–70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bonnet C, Grati M, Marlin S, Levilliers J, Hardelin JP, Parodi M, Niasme-Grare M, Zelenika D, Délépine M, Feldmann D, Jonard L, El-Amraoui A, Weil D, Delobel B, Vincent C, Dollfus H, Eliot MM, David A, Calais C, Vigneron J, Montaut-Verient B, Bonneau D, Dubin J, Thauvin C, Duvillard A, Francannet C, Mom T, Lacombe D, Duriez F, Drouin-Garraud V, Thuillier-Obstoy MF, Sigaudy S, Frances AM, Collignon P, Challe G, Couderc R, Lathrop M, Sahel JA, Weissenbach J, Petit C, Denoyelle F. Complete exon sequencing of all known Usher syndrome genes greatly improves molecular diagnosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:21. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brownstein Z, Ben-Yosef T, Dagan O, Frydman M, Abeliovich D, Sagi M, Abraham FA, Taitelbaum-Swead R, Shohat M, Hildesheimer M, Friedman TB, Avraham KB. The R245X mutation of PCDH15 in Ashkenazi Jewish children diagnosed with nonsyndromic hearing loss foreshadows retinitis pigmentosa. Pediatr Res. 2004;55:995–1000. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000125258.58267.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kimberling WJ. Estimation of the frequency of occult mutations for an autosomal recessive disease in the presence of genetic heterogeneity: application to genetic hearing loss disorders. Hum Mutat. 2005;26:462–70. doi: 10.1002/humu.20221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Doucette L, Merner ND, Cooke S, Ives E, Galutira D, Walsh V, Walsh T, MacLaren L, Cater T, Fernandez B, Green JS, Wilcox ER, Shotland LI, Li XC, Lee M, King MC, Young TL. Profound, prelingual nonsyndromic deafness maps to chromosome 10q21 and is caused by a novel missense mutation in the Usher syndrome type IF gene PCDH15. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:554–64. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Vision are provided here courtesy of Emory University and the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China

RESOURCES