Abstract
Background
The mitochondrial (mt) displacement loop (D-loop) is known to accumulate structural alterations and mutations. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the D-loop among chronic dialysis patients and healthy controls.
Methodology and Principal Findings
We enrolled 193 chronic dialysis patients and 704 healthy controls. SNPs were identified by large scale D-loop sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. Chronic dialysis patients had lower body mass index, blood thiols, and cholesterol levels than controls. A total of 77 SNPs matched with the positions in reference of the Revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (CRS) were found in the study population. Chronic dialysis patients had a significantly higher incidence of 9 SNPs compared to controls. These include SNP5 (16108Y), SNP17 (16172Y), SNP21 (16223Y), SNP34 (16274R), SNP35 (16278Y), SNP55 (16463R), SNP56 (16519Y), SNP64 (185R), and SNP65 (189R) in D-loop of CRS. Among these SNPs with genotypes, SNP55-G, SNP56-C, and SNP64-A were 4.78, 1.47, and 5.15 times more frequent in dialysis patients compared to controls (P<0.05), respectively. When adjusting the covariates of demographics and comorbidities, SNP64-A was 5.13 times more frequent in dialysis patients compared to controls (P<0.01). Furthermore, SNP64-A was found to be 35.80, 3.48, 4.69, 5,55, and 4.67 times higher in female patients and in patients without diabetes, coronary artery disease, smoking, and hypertension in an independent significance manner (P<0.05), respectively. In patients older than 50 years or with hypertension, SNP34-A and SNP17-C were found to be 7.97 and 3.71 times more frequent (P<0.05) compared to patients younger than 50 years or those without hypertension, respectively.
Conclusions and Significance
The results of large-scale sequencing suggest that specific SNPs in the mtDNA D-loop are significantly associated with chronic dialysis. These SNPs can be considered as potential predictors for chronic dialysis.
Introduction
Mitochondria (mt) are organelles that are susceptible to oxidative stress. The presence of excessive amounts of reactive oxidative species (ROS) results in mitochondrial oxidative damage and inefficient repair of mtDNA [1]–[3]. This can contribute to pathophysiological processes, including aging, degenerative disease [4]–[6] and cancer [7]. In these circumstances, somatic mutations are also generated [8].
The displacement loop (D-loop) regions of mtDNA does not encode any functional proteins [9], [10] and is known to accumulate mutations at a higher frequency than other regions of mtDNA in the setting of increased oxidative stress [11]. The D-loop contains the initial site of heavy chain replication and the promoters for heavy and light chain transcription. Therefore, it is responsible for the regulation of mtDNA replication and transcription [10], [11]. The D-loop is highly polymorphic, and some polymorphisms are associated with aging [12]–[15], coronary artery disease [16], and a variety of tumors, including lung [17], colorectal [18], liver [19], gastric [20], breast [21], cervical [22], melanoma [23], head and neck [24], oral [25], and kidney [26] cancers. However, D-loop polymorphisms are not associated with prostate cancer 27,28. Most of these D-loop studies focus on some cancer-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for mtDNA, which were accompanied by poly-C tract alterations [21], [24], [25], [29], [30]. However, D-loop polymorphisms have not been systematically characterized in chronic dialysis patients.
Complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD) promote morbidity and mortality [31]. CKD patients can be classified according to kidney function along a continuum from mild renal dysfunction to irreversible kidney failure. CKD increases oxidative stress [32] which has been demonstrated to influence mtDNA content in CKD patients [33], [34].
Because the D-loop region susceptible to oxidative stress, we hypothesized that specific SNP patterns in the D-loop of chronic dialysis patients may serve as potential genetic markers for chronic dialysis. To examine this hypothesis, we performed D-loop sequencing and used bioinformatic tools to identify SNPs that were associated with chronic dialysis when compared to healthy controls.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
We enrolled 704 unrelated Taiwanese of ethnic Chinese background in this study through the hospital health examination center after giving consent. Participants included 312 men and 392 women with a mean age of 51.9 years. We enrolled 193 dialysis patients from the outpatient dialysis unit of the same hospital. They were composed of 78 men and 115 women with a mean age of 49 years. Venous blood samples were collected after overnight fasting. The serum was separated using a centrifuge and stored at −80°C. DNA was isolated from leucocytes using PUREGENE® DNA Purification kit (Gentra, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and stored at −20°C. The protocol for the present study was approved by the Committee on Human Research at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CMRPG850271, CMRPG850272, CMRPG850242, CMRPG850252, IRB 95-0395B) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants signed a written informed consent form to obtain the approval for participation in this study.
Assessment of Oxidative and Anti-oxidative Stress Capacities
Serum free thiols were determined by direct reaction of the thiols with 5,5-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) to form 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid (TNB). The amount of thiols was calculated from the absorbance determined using the extinction coefficient of TNB (A412 = 13,600 M−1 cm−1). The serum thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) concentration was assessed according to the method of Ohkawa et al. [35]. Results are expressed as micromoles of TBARS per liter. A standard curve of TBARS was obtained by hydrolysis of 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane (TEPP).
D-loop Sequencing
The mtDNA control region segment (relative to nucleotide (nt) regions 15911–16569 and 1–602 in the Revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (“rCRS”) [36]; NC_012920) was amplified using the forward primer L15911 (5′-ACCAGTCTTGTAAACCGGAG-3′) and the reverse primer H602 (5′-GCTTTGAGGAGGTAAGCTAC-3′). The products were purified with gel extraction kits (Watson BioMedicals Inc.) and sequenced using primer L15911 and primer L29 (5′-CTCACGGGAGCTCTCCATGC-3′) on an ABI 377XL DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). However, due to the conversion of thymine to cytosine and the presence of homopolymeric cytosine tracts at nt16184–16193 and nt303–315 within the D-loop region of some subjects, the sequencing procedure was prematurely terminated. Therefore, we also performed reverse sequencing using 2 additional sets of primers, H81 (5′-CAGCGTCTCGCAATGCTATC-3′) and H528 (5′-TTCGGGGTATGGGGTTAGCA-3′). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions used were as follows: an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 60°C for 1 min, and extension at 68°C for 2 min, with a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The PCR fragments were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.
SNP Identification
DNA sequences were analyzed by using the DNASTAR software and Bio Edit Sequence Alignment Editor freeware (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html). After multiple sequence alignments were performed, both 5′ and 3′ ends of the sequences were trimmed into blunt ends. The SNPs were identified by calculating each nucleotide (A, T, C, or G) for each position in the trimmed and aligned sequences by “count if = ” in Excel software. SNP frequencies greater than 1% were selected for further investigation. The SNPs were compared to the D-loop polymorphisms in rCRS as shown in MITOMAP [37] (http://www.mitomap.org/MITOMAP/PolymorphismsControl).
Statistical Analysis
Chi-square tests were used to compare basic characteristics between patients and controls. A sequence of analyses was adopted for SNP selection. The Chi-square tests were first used to compare distributions of SNPs between patients and controls. Nine SNPs with significant differences and with sufficient cell sizes were chosen for further analysis. These 9 SNPs were included in a logistic regression model with backward selection. Only statistically significant SNPs were selected by logistic regression. The same logistic regression selection process was also conducted for several subgroups. Lastly, the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) from selected SNPs were computed on the basis of logistic regression with additional covariates of basic demographic characteristics (Table 1). The statistical data were expressed as mean ± SD. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Table 1. Basic demographic characteristics of patients and controls.
| patients | controls | Chi-square | |||||
| total | n | % | n | % | P value | ||
| Total | 897 | 193 | 21.5 | 704 | 78.5 | ||
| Sex | female | 427 | 115 | 59.6 | 312 | 44.3 | 0.0002 |
| male | 470 | 78 | 40.4 | 392 | 55.7 | ||
| Age | ≤50 | 422 | 97 | 50.3 | 325 | 46.2 | 0.3127 |
| >50 | 475 | 96 | 49.7 | 379 | 53.8 | ||
| Mean (SD) | 49.0 | (13.9) | 51.9 | (12.9) | 0.0055 | ||
| DM | N | 836 | 161 | 83.4 | 675 | 98.3 | <0.0001 |
| Y | 44 | 32 | 16.6 | 12 | 1.7 | ||
| CHD | N | 854 | 170 | 88.1 | 684 | 98.4 | <0.0001 |
| Y | 34 | 23 | 11.9 | 11 | 1.6 | ||
| HT | N | 593 | 109 | 56.5 | 484 | 69.6 | 0.0006 |
| Y | 295 | 84 | 43.5 | 211 | 30.4 | ||
| Smoke | N | 698 | 170 | 88.1 | 528 | 75.0 | 0.0001 |
| Y | 199 | 23 | 11.9 | 176 | 25.0 | ||
| BMI | Mean (SD) | 22.3 | (3.8) | 24.5 | (3.5) | <0.0001 | |
| TBARS | Mean (SD) | 1.1 | (0.6) | 1.2 | (0.8) | 0.0801 | |
| Thiols | Mean (SD) | 1.5 | (0.5) | 2.0 | (0.4) | <0.0001 | |
| TG | Mean (SD) | 169.5 | (128.1) | 130.4 | (85.7) | <0.0001 | |
| Chol | Mean (SD) | 189.4 | (35.7) | 202.1 | (37.9) | <0.0001 | |
Abbreviations and/or units: CHD: coronary heart disease, HT: hypertension, BMI: body mass index, TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (µM), Thiols (µM); TG: triglyceride (mg/dL), Chol: cholesterol (mg/dL).
Results
Basic Demographic Characteristics
The study participants included 193 dialysis patients and 704 healthy controls, and their basic characteristics are shown in Table 1. Most of these characteristics were found to be significantly different, except for age groups and blood TBARS levels. The patients were 3 years younger (49.0±13.9 vs. 51.9±12.9) than the controls and had lower values of body mass index (BMI), blood thiols, and cholesterol levels. The mean triglyceride (TG) level was higher in patients than in controls. There was a significantly higher incidence of comorbidities of diabetes, hypertension (HT), and coronary heart disease (CHD) in dialysis patients compared to controls.
D-loop Sequencing, Alignment, and SNP Identification
There are 2 poly-C regions in the mitochondrial D-loop that stretch between nt16180–16195 [38] and nt303–315 [9]. Because the length of these mononucleotide repeats varies, they may interfere the sequence alignment processing or lead to error alignment in part. Accordingly, the sequences for these 2 repeat regions were replaced with the corresponding sequences for the reference CRS to improve the performance of sequence alignment. The sequencing data from the 5′ and 3′ ends of nt15911–16000 and nt486–602 were of poor quality and, therefore, were trimmed after confirmation of sequence alignment. Finally, aligned sequences were trimmed to the same length ranging from nt16000–16569 and nt1–485 for further SNP identification (Table S1 and Table S2; all D-loop trimmed sequences for cases and controls and their alignment visualization, respectively). After examining each nt for each position of the trimmed sequence, 77 SNPs with frequencies greater than 1% were identified (Table S3). The relationships between positions of the aligned sequences and D-loop in the reference CRS as well as the SNP types in the IUPAC code are listed in Table 2.
Table 2. SNP identification from aligned sequences of cases and controls and their positional information.
| SNP No. | Align-position*1 | D-loop position*2 | IUPAC code | SNP No. | Align-position*1 | D-loop position*2 | IUPAC code |
| 1 | 51 | 16051 | R | 40 | 298 | 16298 | Y |
| 2 | 86 | 16086 | Y | 41 | 304 | 16304 | Y |
| 3 | 92 | 16092 | H | 42 | 309 | 16309 | R |
| 4 | 93 | 16093 | Y | 43 | 311 | 16311 | Y |
| 5 | 108 | 16108 | Y | 44 | 316 | 16316 | R |
| 6 | 111 | 16111 | Y | 45 | 319 | 16319 | R |
| 7 | 126 | 16126 | Y | 46 | 324 | 16324 | Y |
| 8 | 129 | 16129 | R | 47 | 327 | 16327 | Y |
| 9 | 136 | 16136 | Y | 48 | 335 | 16335 | R |
| 10 | 140 | 16140 | Y | 49 | 355 | 16355 | Y |
| 11 | 145 | 16145 | R | 50 | 356 | 16356 | Y |
| 12 | 148 | 16148 | Y | 51 | 357 | 16357 | Y |
| 13 | 157 | 16157 | Y | 52 | 362 | 16362 | Y |
| 14 | 162 | 16162 | R | 53 | 390 | 16390 | R |
| 15 | 164 | 16164 | R | 54 | 399 | 16399 | R |
| 16 | 167 | 16167 | Y | 55 | 463 | 16463 | R |
| 17 | 172 | 16172 | Y | 56 | 519 | 16519 | Y |
| 18 | 209 | 16209 | Y | 57 | 662 | 93 | R |
| 19 | 217 | 16217 | Y | 58 | 672 | 103 | R |
| 20 | 218 | 16218 | Y | 59 | 715 | 146 | H |
| 21 | 223 | 16223 | Y | 60 | 719 | 150 | Y |
| 22 | 227 | 16227 | R | 61 | 720 | 151 | Y |
| 23 | 234 | 16234 | Y | 62 | 721 | 152 | Y |
| 24 | 235 | 16235 | R | 63 | 722 | 153 | R |
| 25 | 243 | 16243 | H | 64 | 754 | 185 | R |
| 26 | 248 | 16248 | Y | 65 | 758 | 189 | R |
| 27 | 249 | 16249 | Y | 66 | 763 | 194 | Y |
| 28 | 256 | 16256 | Y | 67 | 764 | 195 | Y |
| 29 | 257 | 16257 | H | 68 | 768 | 199 | Y |
| 30 | 260 | 16260 | Y | 69 | 769 | 200 | R |
| 31 | 261 | 16261 | Y | 70 | 773 | 204 | Y |
| 32 | 266 | 16266 | N | 71 | 776 | 207 | R |
| 33 | 272 | 16272 | R | 72 | 779 | 210 | R |
| 34 | 274 | 16274 | R | 73 | 786 | 217 | Y |
| 35 | 278 | 16278 | Y | 74 | 803 | 234 | R |
| 36 | 290 | 16290 | Y | 75 | 804 | 235 | R |
| 37 | 291 | 16291 | Y | 76 | 885 | 317 | Y |
| 38 | 295 | 16295 | Y | 77 | 1019 | 461 | Y |
| 39 | 297 | 16297 | Y |
1.The positions are defined by the aligned sequences from cases and controls. Due to the poor quality at both 5′ and 3′ ends for PCR amplified by primers L15911/H602 as described in materials and methods, the sequences of nt15911–16000 and nt486–602 of the NC_012920 were excluded. nt249/353/354 of the NC_012920 were not included because they were not found in our sequencing data.
2.The position for the D-loop in the Revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (“rCRS”; NC_012920).
Significance Analysis for 77 Individual SNPs
The P values for 77 individual SNPs with A, G, C, and T distribution data were analyzed (Table S4). Nine SNPs were selected from 77 SNPs by Chi-square tests with significant differences and sufficient cell sizes; their genotype distributions are compared in Table 3. For each SNP, the genotype that appeared at a higher frequency in patients was selected as the indicator. Hence, the indicators for the SNPs 5, 17, 21, 34, 35, 55, 56, 64, and 65 (16108Y, 16172Y, 16223Y, 16274R, 16278Y, 16463R, 16519Y, 185R, and 189R) were T, C, C, A, C, G, C, A, and G, respectively. These 9 indicators were further added into a logistic regression by employing the backward selection method.
Table 3. The 9 SNPs with significantly different genotype distributions between patients and controls.
| patients | controls | Chi-square | ||||||
| Variable* 1 | Variable* 2 | total | n | % | n | % | P value | |
| total | 897 | 193 | 704 | |||||
| SNP 5 | 16108Y | C | 877 | 185 | 95.9 | 692 | 98.3 | 0.0419 |
| T | 20 | 8 | 4.1 | 12 | 1.7 | |||
| SNP 17 | 16172Y | C | 126 | 36 | 18.7 | 90 | 12.8 | 0.0376 |
| T | 771 | 157 | 81.3 | 614 | 87.2 | |||
| SNP 21 | 16223Y | C | 394 | 97 | 50.3 | 297 | 42.2 | 0.0453 |
| T | 503 | 96 | 49.7 | 407 | 57.8 | |||
| SNP 34 | 16274R | A | 13 | 6 | 3.1 | 7 | 1.0 | 0.0294 |
| G | 884 | 187 | 96.9 | 697 | 99.0 | |||
| SNP 35 | 16278Y | C | 843 | 188 | 97.4 | 655 | 93.0 | 0.0238 |
| T | 54 | 5 | 2.6 | 49 | 7.0 | |||
| SNP 55 | 16463R | A | 888 | 188 | 97.4 | 700 | 99.4 | 0.0125 |
| G | 9 | 5 | 2.6 | 4 | 0.6 | |||
| SNP 56 | 16519Y | C | 488 | 119 | 61.7 | 369 | 52.4 | 0.0224 |
| T | 409 | 74 | 38.3 | 335 | 47.6 | |||
| SNP 64 | 185R | A | 25 | 14 | 7.3 | 11 | 1.6 | 0.0000 |
| G | 872 | 179 | 92.7 | 693 | 98.4 | |||
| SNP 65 | 189R | A | 874 | 184 | 95.3 | 690 | 98.0 | 0.0373 |
| G | 23 | 9 | 4.7 | 14 | 2.0 | |||
1The annotation of these SNPs is listed in Table 2.
2SNPs in rCRS position with IUPAC code.
Backward Logistic Regression Analysis for 9 SNPs
As shown in Table 4, we identified 3 statistically significant indicators (SNP55 G, SNP56 C, and SNP64 A). Individuals with the SNP55 G increase risk of chronic dialysis by 4.78 times (OR, 95% CI = 1.26∼18.09, P = 0.0212). SNP56 C or SNP64 A subjects increase risk of chronic dialysis by 1.47 (95% CI = 1.06∼2.04, P = 0.0225) or 5.15 (95% CI = 2.29∼11.60, P = 0.0001) times. The AORs of the 3 SNPs were further computed by adding the covariates shown in Table 1 into the logistic regression analysis. Following this, only SNP64 A remained significant (OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 1.61∼16.35, P = 0.0057). Hence, SNP64 is only an independent SNP for disease as well as for the patients’ basic characteristics. On the other hand, while SNP55 and SNP56 found in the backward logistic regression could only be considered as independent SNPs among the 77 SNPs, they were affected by covariates.
Table 4. The OR and AOR for the 3 SNPs selected by backward logistic regression.
| Variable* 1 | OR* 2 | 95% CI | P value | AOR* 3 | 95% CI | P value |
| SNP 55 G vs. A | 4.78 | 1.26–18.09 | 0.0212 | 1.35 | 0.15–12.41 | 0.7886 |
| SNP 56 C vs. T | 1.47 | 1.06–2.04 | 0.0225 | 1.41 | 0.89–2.24 | 0.1441 |
| SNP 64 A vs. G | 5.15 | 2.29–11.60 | 0.0001 | 5.13 | 1.61–16.35 | 0.0057 |
1.The annotation of these SNPs is listed in Table 2.
2.Odds ratios (ORs) were computed by having only SNP variables in the logistic regression.
3.Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were computed by having SNP variables in the analysis model with covariates of sex, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, smoker, hypertension, age, body mass index, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance, thiols, triglyceride, and cholesterol.
Stepwise Regression for Subgroups Related to Several Basic Demographic Characteristics
Similar procedures were also conducted in several subgroups (Table 5). While the frequencies of SNP55 and SNP64 were found to be significantly higher in women, only those with SNP64 A genotype had a statistically significant higher risk of chronic dialysis (AOR = 35.80, 95% CI = 3.23∼396.84, P = 0.004). In subjects older than 50 years, SNP34 A genotype was significantly associated with chronic dialysis (AOR = 7.97, 95% CI = 1.25∼50.94, P = 0.028). For subjects without diabetes, without CHD, no smoking habit, or without HT, SNP64 A was the independent SNP in association with chronic dialysis (AOR = 3.48, 4.69, 5.55, and 4.67, P = 0.010, 0.016, and 0.046, respectively). For subjects with history of hypertension, SNP17 C was significantly associated with chronic dialysis (AOR = 3.71, 95% CI = 1.10∼12.55, P = 0.035).
Table 5. The OR and AOR for the 9 SNPs selected by backward logistic regression for subgroups related to several basic demographic characteristics.
| (no adjust) *1 | female | male | age< = 50 | age>50 | |||||||||||
| effect *2 | OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | |||
| SNP 5 T vs. C | 5.88 | 1.78–19.44 | 0.004 | ||||||||||||
| SNP 17 C vs. T | 1.81 | 1.01–3.28 | 0.048 | ||||||||||||
| SNP 21 C vs. T | 2.06 | 1.22–3.47 | 0.007 | ||||||||||||
| SNP 34 A vs. G | 5.26 | 1.15–24.00 | 0.032 | ||||||||||||
| SNP 35 C vs. T | |||||||||||||||
| SNP 55 G vs. A | 6.10 | 1.10–33.79 | 0.039 | 11.43 | 1.17–111.50 | 0.036 | |||||||||
| SNP 56 C vs. T | |||||||||||||||
| SNP 64 A vs. G | 15.24 | 3.29–70.73 | 0.001 | 5.59 | 1.89–16.57 | 0.002 | |||||||||
| SNP 65 G vs. A | 8.14 | 1.57–42.28 | 0.013 | ||||||||||||
1.Odds ratios (ORs) were computed by having only SNP variables in the logistic regression.
2.Significant SNPs were selected by backward logistic regression for subgroups.
3.Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were computed by having SNP variables in the analysis model with covariates of sex, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, smoker, hypertension, age, body mass index, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance, thiols, triglyceride, and cholesterol.
4.Adjusted covariates were added in models with significant SNPs.
P = P value.
Discussion
To date, most association studies of chronic dialysis focus on the nuclear genome [39]–[43] rather on mtDNA. In our previous report [9], we addressed the association between polymorphisms in the poly-C tract (D310) of the mtDNA D-loop and probability of dialysis treatment. However, we found that the poly-C tract was not significantly different in dialysis patients compared with healthy controls. In addition to the poly-C tract, SNPs are also found in the D-loop. Therefore, we decided to determine whether there was any association between chronic dialysis and SNPs in the D-loop in this study.
Using sequence alignment, we found 9 SNPs present at significantly higher frequency in dialysis patients (SNP5, 17, 21, 34, 35, 55, 56, 64, and 65). Among them, 3 significant indicators (SNP55 G, SNP56 C, and SNP64 A) were independently associated with a high risk of chronic dialysis. Furthermore, only women with the SNP64 A genotype were statistically significant to be associated with chronic dialysis. SNP34 A was significantly associated with chronic dialysis in subjects older than 50 years. For subjects without diabetes, CHD, or hypertension, or in non-smokers, SNP64 A was statistically associated with chronic dialysis. Individuals with history of hypertension were significantly associated with chronic dialysis if they carried SNP17 C.
In this study, we focused solely on the question of whether individual SNPs within the D-loop were associated with chronic dialysis. However, the consideration of interdependence among SNPs was found to improve the association of genetic variations with several diseases [44], [45] and cancers [46]–[54]. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that some rare SNPs may still contribute to the synergistic association with chronic dialysis.
According to the diseases-associated mtSNPs in the D-loop locus in MITOMAP [37] (http://www.mitomap.org/bin/view.pl/MITOMAP/MutationsCodingControl), only 7 mtSNPs were reported. With reference to the rCRS, these are C114T, C150T, T195C, C309CC, T16189C, A16300G, and C16519T. We only identified C150T (SNP60), T195C (SNP67), and C16519T (SNP56) in our study (Table 2), and of these, only C16519T (SNP56) was significantly associated with chronic dialysis (Table 3 and Table 4). Similarly, C16519T was reported to be associated with “cyclic vomiting syndrome with migraine” [55], [56]. When stratification of genotypes by demographic characteristics was considered, C16519T did not appear to be a marker associated with chronic dialysis (Table 5). On the contrary, we identified several novel mtSNPs associated with chronic dialysis, suggesting that these mtSNPs are potential genetic markers for this disease.
The acquisition of ROS-induced mutations in CKD may be a consequence of increased oxidative burden in patients with chronic renal failure [9], [32], [33], [57]. For example, elevated oxidative stress in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients may lead to alterations in the mtDNA copy number in peripheral leukocytes [33]. In our current study, the mtSNPs listed in Table 3 were homoplasmic, as revealed by sequencing chromatograms (data not shown) [58]–[60]. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that a minor fraction of heteroplasmic mutations, below the level of sensitivity of the sequencing method that we used, may be present. We suggest that additional PCR/restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis may assist in the identification of mitochondrial heteroplasmy [61], [62]. In light of this, we are unable to identify mtSNPs that are suitable as progression markers for CKD with our current data, since our sequencing method lacked sufficient sensitivity to detect ROS-induced mutations. Therefore, the biological and clinical significance of the homoplasmic mtSNPs are more suitable as potential genetic markers for chronic dialysis, rather than progression markers of CKD.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of SNPs in the mtDNA D-loop showing that they are significantly associated with chronic dialysis. The study also demonstrated the relationship of SNPs with comorbidities in dialysis patients. One may postulate that the presence of these SNPs is a risk factor for the development of end-stage renal disease, and that they may be used as markers to predict the likelihood of dialysis. In the future, further studies are needed to establish the role of these SNPs in the pathophysiology of CKD and to validate their clinical application.
Supporting Information
Case (n = 193)-D-loop trimmed sequences in FSATA format.
(TXT)
Control (n = 704)-D-loop trimmed sequences in FSATA format.
(TXT)
77 SNP genotype raw data for cases and controls.
(XLSX)
P values of 77 individual SNPs for cases and controls.
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the valuable technical assistance of Miss Yi-Ju Tsai, Miss Jia-Ying Yang, and Mr. Yu-Da Lin.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This study was partly supported by grants from Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital under contract nos. CMRPG850271, CMRPG850272, CMRPG850242, and CMRPG850252, the Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Republic of China (DOH101-TD-C-111-002), and the Kaohsiung Medical University Research Foundation (KMUER014 and KMU-M110001) and the National Sun Yat-sen University-KMU Joint Research Project (#NSYSUKMU 101-006). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.do Rosario Marinho AN, de Moraes MR, Santos S, Ribeiro-Dos-Santos A. Human aging and somatic point mutations in mtDNA: A comparative study of generational differences (grandparents and grandchildren). Genet Mol Biol. 2011;34:31–34. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khaidakov M, Heflich RH, Manjanatha MG, Myers MB, Aidoo A. Accumulation of point mutations in mitochondrial DNA of aging mice. Mutat Res. 2003;526:1–7. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(03)00010-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rose G, Passarino G, Franceschi C, De Benedictis G. The variability of the mitochondrial genome in human aging: a key for life and death? Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;34:1449–1460. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00042-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mao P, Reddy PH. Aging and amyloid beta-induced oxidative DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: implications for early intervention and therapeutics. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812:1359–1370. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kashihara N, Haruna Y, Kondeti VK, Kanwar YS. Oxidative stress in diabetic nephropathy. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:4256–4269. doi: 10.2174/092986710793348581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Karbowski M, Neutzner A. Neurodegeneration as a consequence of failed mitochondrial maintenance. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123:157–171. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0921-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sotgia F, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Lisanti MP. Mitochondrial oxidative stress drives tumor progression and metastasis: should we use antioxidants as a key component of cancer treatment and prevention? BMC Med. 2011;9:62. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.He Y, Wu J, Dressman DC, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Markowitz SD, et al. Heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA mutations in normal and tumour cells. Nature. 2010;464:610–614. doi: 10.1038/nature08802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen JB, Lin TK, Liao SC, Lee WC, Lee LC, et al. Lack of association between mutations of gene-encoding mitochondrial D310 (displacement loop) mononucleotide repeat and oxidative stress in chronic dialysis patients in Taiwan. J Negat Results Biomed. 2009;8:10. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-8-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Penta JS, Johnson FM, Wachsman JT, Copeland WC. Mitochondrial DNA in human malignancy. Mutat Res. 2001;488:119–133. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(01)00053-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clayton DA. Transcription and replication of mitochondrial DNA. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:11–17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.suppl_2.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Michikawa Y, Mazzucchelli F, Bresolin N, Scarlato G, Attardi G. Aging-dependent large accumulation of point mutations in the human mtDNA control region for replication. Science. 1999;286:774–779. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5440.774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Coskun PE, Ruiz-Pesini E, Wallace DC. Control region mtDNA variants: longevity, climatic adaptation, and a forensic conundrum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2174–2176. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630589100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang Y, Michikawa Y, Mallidis C, Bai Y, Woodhouse L, et al. Muscle-specific mutations accumulate with aging in critical human mtDNA control sites for replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:4022–4027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061013598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang J, Asin-Cayuela J, Fish J, Michikawa Y, Bonafe M, et al. Strikingly higher frequency in centenarians and twins of mtDNA mutation causing remodeling of replication origin in leukocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:1116–1121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.242719399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mueller EE, Eder W, Ebner S, Schwaiger E, Santic D, et al. The mitochondrial T16189C polymorphism is associated with coronary artery disease in Middle European populations. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Suzuki M, Toyooka S, Miyajima K, Iizasa T, Fujisawa T, et al. Alterations in the mitochondrial displacement loop in lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:5636–5641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lievre A, Chapusot C, Bouvier AM, Zinzindohoue F, Piard F, et al. Clinical value of mitochondrial mutations in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3517–3525. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang C, Zhang F, Fan H, Peng L, Zhang R, et al. Sequence polymorphisms of mitochondrial D-loop and hepatocellular carcinoma outcome. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;406:493–496. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.02.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu CW, Yin PH, Hung WY, Li AF, Li SH, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutations and mitochondrial DNA depletion in gastric cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005;44:19–28. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Parrella P, Xiao Y, Fliss M, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Mazzarelli P, et al. Detection of mitochondrial DNA mutations in primary breast cancer and fine-needle aspirates. Cancer Res. 2001;61:7623–7626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goia-Rusanu CD, Iancu IV, Botezatu A, Socolov D, Huica I, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in patients with HRHPV-related cervical lesions. Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol. 2011;70:5–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ebner S, Lang R, Mueller E, Eder W, Oeller M, et al. Mitochondrial haplogroups, control region polymorphisms and malignant melanoma: A study in Middle European Caucasians. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ha PK, Tong BC, Westra WH, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Parrella P, et al. Mitochondrial C-tract alteration in premalignant lesions of the head and neck: a marker for progression and clonal proliferation. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:2260–2265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu SA, Jiang RS, Chen FJ, Wang WY, Lin JC. Somatic mutations in the D-loop of mitochondrial DNA in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol: in press. 2011. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Nagy A, Wilhelm M, Kovacs G. Mutations of mtDNA in renal cell tumours arising in end-stage renal disease. J Pathol. 2003;199:237–242. doi: 10.1002/path.1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mueller EE, Eder W, Mayr JA, Paulweber B, Sperl W, et al. Mitochondrial haplogroups and control region polymorphisms are not associated with prostate cancer in Middle European Caucasians. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim W, Yoo TK, Shin DJ, Rho HW, Jin HJ, et al. Mitochondrial DNA haplogroup analysis reveals no association between the common genetic lineages and prostate cancer in the Korean population. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nomoto S, Yamashita K, Koshikawa K, Nakao A, Sidransky D. Mitochondrial D-loop mutations as clonal markers in multicentric hepatocellular carcinoma and plasma. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:481–487. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wada T, Tanji N, Ozawa A, Wang J, Shimamoto K, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutations and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine content in Japanese patients with urinary bladder and renal cancers. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:3403–3408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lenz O, Fornoni A. Chronic kidney disease care delivered by US family medicine and internal medicine trainees: results from an online survey. BMC Med. 2006;4:30. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Himmelfarb J, Stenvinkel P, Ikizler TA, Hakim RM. The elephant in uremia: oxidant stress as a unifying concept of cardiovascular disease in uremia. Kidney Int. 2002;62:1524–1538. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00600.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen JB, Lin TK, Liou CW, Liao SC, Lee LC, et al. Correlation of oxidative stress biomarkers and peritoneal urea clearance with mitochondrial DNA copy number in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2008;28:853–859. doi: 10.1159/000139638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang YC, Lee WC, Liao SC, Lee LC, Su YJ, et al. Mitochondrial DNA copy number correlates with oxidative stress and predicts mortality in nondiabetic hemodialysis patients. J Nephrol. 2011;24:351–358. doi: 10.5301/JN.2010.5816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979;95:351–358. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Andrews RM, Kubacka I, Chinnery PF, Lightowlers RN, Turnbull DM, et al. Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA. Nat Genet. 1999;23:147. doi: 10.1038/13779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ruiz-Pesini E, Lott MT, Procaccio V, Poole JC, Brandon MC, et al. An enhanced MITOMAP with a global mtDNA mutational phylogeny. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D823–828. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liou CW, Lin TK, Chen JB, Tiao MM, Weng SW, et al. Association between a common mitochondrial DNA D-loop polycytosine variant and alteration of mitochondrial copy number in human peripheral blood cells. J Med Genet. 2010;47:723–728. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.077552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zheng ZL, Hwang YH, Kim SK, Kim S, Son MJ, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha and cardiovascular disease in hemodialysis patients. Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;113:c104–111. doi: 10.1159/000228542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sperati CJ, Parekh RS, Berthier-Schaad Y, Jaar BG, Plantinga L, et al. Association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in JAK3, STAT4, and STAT6 with new cardiovascular events in incident dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:845–855. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sigrist MK, McIntyre CW. Vascular calcification is associated with impaired microcirculatory function in chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;108:c121–126. doi: 10.1159/000114202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kalousova M, Germanova A, Jachymova M, Mestek O, Tesar V, et al. A419C (E111A) polymorphism of the glyoxalase I gene and vascular complications in chronic hemodialysis patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1126:268–271. doi: 10.1196/annals.1433.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wetmore JB, Johansen KL, Sen S, Hung AM, Lovett DH. An angiotensin converting enzyme haplotype predicts survival in patients with end stage renal disease. Hum Genet. 2006;120:201–210. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0191-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yao L, Zhong W, Zhang Z, Maenner MJ, Engelman CD. Classification tree for detection of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-by-SNP interactions related to heart disease: Framingham Heart Study. BMC Proc. 2009;3:S83. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-3-s7-s83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lin GT, Tseng HF, Chang CK, Chuang LY, Liu CS, et al. SNP combinations in chromosome-wide genes are associated with bone mineral density in Taiwanese women. Chin J Physiol. 2008;51:32–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Briollais L, Wang Y, Rajendram I, Onay V, Shi E, et al. Methodological issues in detecting gene-gene interactions in breast cancer susceptibility: a population-based study in Ontario. BMC Med. 2007;5:22. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bostrom MA, Kao WH, Li M, Abboud HE, Adler SG, et al. Genetic association and gene-gene interaction analyses in African American dialysis patients with nondiabetic nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis: in press. 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Yen CY, Liu SY, Chen CH, Tseng HF, Chuang LY, et al. Combinational polymorphisms of four DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3, and XRCC4 and their association with oral cancer in Taiwan. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008;37:271–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00608.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zheng SL, Sun J, Wiklund F, Smith S, Stattin P, et al. Cumulative association of five genetic variants with prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:910–919. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa075819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lin GT, Tseng HF, Yang CH, Hou MF, Chuang LY, et al. Combinational polymorphisms of seven CXCL12-related genes are protective against breast cancer in Taiwan. OMICS. 2009;13:165–172. doi: 10.1089/omi.2008.0050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yang CH, Chuang LY, Chen YJ, Tseng HF, Chang HW. Computational analysis of simulated SNP interactions between 26 growth factor-related genes in a breast cancer association study. OMICS. 2011;15:399–407. doi: 10.1089/omi.2010.0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chuang LY, Chang HW, Lin MC, Yang CH. Chaotic particle swarm optimization for detecting SNP-SNP interactions for CXCL12-related genes in breast cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012;21:336–342. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32834e31f6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chuang LY, Lin YD, Chang HW, Yang CH. An improved PSO algorithm for generating protective SNP barcodes in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yang CH, Chuang LY, Cheng YH, Lin YD, Wang CL, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism barcoding to evaluate oral cancer risk using odds ratios-based genetic algorithms. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012;28:362–368. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Boles RG, Zaki EA, Lavenbarg T, Hejazi R, Foran P, et al. Are pediatric and adult-onset cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) biologically different conditions? Relationship of adult-onset CVS with the migraine and pediatric CVS-associated common mtDNA polymorphisms 16519T and 3010A. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:936–e972. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zaki EA, Freilinger T, Klopstock T, Baldwin EE, Heisner KR, et al. Two common mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms are highly associated with migraine headache and cyclic vomiting syndrome. Cephalalgia. 2009;29:719–728. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01793.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rao M, Li L, Demello C, Guo D, Jaber BL, et al. Mitochondrial DNA injury and mortality in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:189–196. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007091031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Reiner JE, Kishore RB, Levin BC, Albanetti T, Boire N, et al. Detection of heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA in single mitochondria. PLoS One. 2010;5:e14359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tan DJ, Chang J, Chen WL, Agress LJ, Yeh KT, et al. Novel heteroplasmic frameshift and missense somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in oral cancer of betel quid chewers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003;37:186–194. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Andrew T, Calloway CD, Stuart S, Lee SH, Gill R, et al. A twin study of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms shows that heteroplasmy at multiple sites is associated with mtDNA variant 16093 but not with zygosity. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.McFarland R, Chinnery PF, Blakely EL, Schaefer AM, Morris AA, et al. Homoplasmy, heteroplasmy, and mitochondrial dystonia. Neurology. 2007;69:911–916. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000267843.10977.4a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wang Q, Boles RG. Individual human hair mitochondrial DNA control region heteroplasmy proportions in mothers and children. Mitochondrion. 2006;6:37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2005.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Case (n = 193)-D-loop trimmed sequences in FSATA format.
(TXT)
Control (n = 704)-D-loop trimmed sequences in FSATA format.
(TXT)
77 SNP genotype raw data for cases and controls.
(XLSX)
P values of 77 individual SNPs for cases and controls.
(XLSX)