Skip to main content
Cardiovascular Research logoLink to Cardiovascular Research
editorial
. 2012 Apr 27;95(3):265–268. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvs155

Intracellular Ca2+ waves, afterdepolarizations, and triggered arrhythmias

Yohannes Shiferaw 1, Gary L Aistrup 2, J Andrew Wasserstrom 2,*
PMCID: PMC3400355  PMID: 22542713

1. Introduction

Clinical studies have shown that sudden death is initiated by an ill-timed propagated ectopic beat that leads to fibrillation.14 However, the mechanism underlying these focal excitations is not completely understood. Experimental studies have demonstrated that abnormal calcium (Ca2+) cycling is a critical factor in the development of focal excitations.59 These excitations can be caused by spontaneous Ca2+ release (SCR) in the form of intracellular Ca2+ waves. These waves are initiated when Ca2+ release from a few Ca2+ release units (CRUs) on the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) causes regenerative release in adjoining units via Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR), causing Ca2+ wave propagation. The resulting depolarizing inward current through the electrogenic Na+–Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) depolarizes the cell membrane to threshold, producing a triggered beat.1014

The relationship between subcellular Ca2+ waves and focal excitations in cardiac tissue is, however, still not completely understood. The basic unanswered question is how Ca2+ release within a population of cardiac cells can induce sufficient inward current to overcome the electrotonic load of the neighbouring cells. In this paper, we will discuss some key ideas that are essential in answering this question, focusing on the probabilistic nature of SCR and the importance of measuring the timing distribution of Ca2+ waves in multicellular populations in tissue. We will also discuss our recent results showing that the likelihood of a triggered beat is determined by the variance of the timing distribution, which is dictated by the time course of SR reloading.15,16 In addition, we will discuss our observations of a form of Ca2+ wave that is distinct from SCR. These Ca2+ waves occur only during rapid pacing and occur with a latency that is significantly shorter than the spontaneous waves observed following cessation of pacing. We argue that these Ca2+ waves are ‘triggered’ as opposed to ‘spontaneous’, since they must be initiated by L-type Ca2+ channel (LCC) openings rather than random ryanodine receptor (RyR) openings. Finally, we discuss the complex dynamics and timing of these waves and why they may be at least as—and possibly more—arrhythmogenic than spontaneous waves.

2. How do spontaneous Ca2+ waves cause triggered arrhythmias?

Spontaneous Ca2+ waves are typically observed under conditions of SR Ca2+ overload and are known to cause depolarization of the cardiac cell membrane that, under the right conditions, can achieve the threshold for activation for spontaneous electrical activity.17,18 This process occurs because the Ca2+ released during Ca2+ waves induces sufficient inward current via the activation of Ca2+-sensitive currents, particularly forward-mode NCX current but possibly other Ca2+-sensitive inward currents. The resulting depolarization, known as a delayed afterdepolarization (DAD), is regulated by the timing and the amount of Ca2+ released by the Ca2+ wave so that if the DAD is early enough and large enough, it can activate the rapid Na+ inward current, producing a triggered beat.12,19,20

The bi-directional coupling between subcellular Ca2+ and voltage is thought to be the mechanism underlying a variety of triggered arrhythmias. However, a fundamental question regarding the arrhythmogenic potential for Ca2+ waves is how Ca2+ release in single cells becomes sufficiently synchronized in both time and space to produce enough depolarization to bring a critical mass of tissue to voltage threshold. To address this question, recent studies have applied confocal imaging of subcellular Ca2+ in individual cardiac myocytes of the whole rat heart.15,21 These studies show that the timing of SCR is determined by localized Ca2+ release events which propagate as Ca2+ waves. The precise origin of these localized release events is not known, but it is likely that they are due to localized, SCR events of sufficient magnitude to propagate as a fire-diffuse-fire wave. Based on this physical picture, the probability distribution of the time to the first propagating SCR event (first latency distribution) dictates how Ca2+ waves are coordinated among cells in tissue. To quantify this probability distribution, we measured the average and variance of the first latency distribution.15 These quantities both decreased with increasing pacing rate and external Ca2+ concentration, thus explaining the reduced latency and increased synchronization of SCR across large cell populations.

In order to understand the mechanisms responsible for reduced timing variability, we applied numerical simulations of subcellular Ca2+ release within cells and groups of cells.15,16 These simulations revealed that the decrease in variance of the first latency distribution can be explained by the faster recovery of the SR Ca2+ load. This occurs because the uptake of Ca2+ back into the SR is up-regulated due to increased diastolic Ca2+ concentrations during rapid pacing. Thus, the faster recovery kinetics of SR Ca2+ content are directly responsible for both reduced latency and decreased timing variability. Therefore, even though the timing of Ca2+ waves is statistically independent between cells, these events tend to occur at the same time because all cells in the population experience a faster SR Ca2+ recovery. Thus, the apparent synchronization of Ca2+ waves among cells can be explained by the intrinsic properties of Ca2+ cycling, without invoking Ca2+ diffusion between cells.

3. Initiation of Ca2+ waves: triggered vs. spontaneous

In order to initiate a Ca2+ wave, Ca2+ release must first occur within a single CRU and then diffuse to initiate Ca2+ release at the neighbouring CRUs via CICR. Hence, it is important to understand the mechanisms that initiate the first Ca2+ release event. There are two distinct possibilities: (i) an LCC transitions to the open state and allows a flux of Ca2+ to enter, diffuse, and then trigger Ca2+ release from the local RyR cluster; (ii) an RyR channel in the cluster randomly transitions to the open state and allows Ca2+ to flow from the SR into the CRU, which induces Ca2+ release via CICR. Ca2+ waves induced by the above mechanisms will be referred to as ‘triggered Ca2+ waves’ and ‘spontaneous Ca2+ waves’, respectively. Most experimental studies typically measure Ca2+ waves following the cessation of pacing. In this case, the first Ca2+ wave typically occurs during the resting membrane potential, when the open probability of LCCs is low and they are therefore more likely to be spontaneous rather than triggered. However, triggered Ca2+ waves can be observed under the appropriate conditions, such as in heart failure.22,23 Figure 1A shows a longitudinal recording of a line-scan confocal image of a single myocyte from the epicardial surface of an intact failing spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) heart. Despite small Ca2+ transients evoked during stimulation at a basic cycle length (BCL) of 400 ms, a series of large Ca2+ waves (indicated by arrows) occurred during stimulation but were absent following the cessation of pacing. The incidence of triggered waves is non-uniform in the failing heart as shown in the transverse recording (Figure 1B) of two neighbouring myocytes in which normal excitation–contraction (E–C) coupling is present in Cell 1 while triggered waves (arrows) occur only during pacing in Cell 2. Supplementary material online, Video S1, shows a site where there are small Ca2+ transients in all cells in the visual field, even though many of the cells are also showing propagated triggered Ca2+ waves which cease immediately when pacing stops, after which several spontaneous waves develop in some cells before pacing is re-initiated. Hence, we can conclude that these waves are not spontaneous and are most likely triggered by LCC openings during the action potential (AP).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Triggered waves in congestive heart failure. (A) Longitudinal line-scan recording of a single cell on the epicardial surface of a failing intact SHR heart paced at BCL = 400 ms. Arrows indicate triggered waves. The top trace is the ECG and the bottom trace is the mean intensity profile. (B) Transverse recording of two neighbouring myocytes during pacing at BCL = 700 and 400 ms. Reproduced from Wasserstrom et al.22 with permission.

4. Mechanism for triggered waves

Ca2+ waves propagate in cardiac cells due to a fire-diffuse-fire mechanism that allows local Ca2+ release events to spread throughout the cell. A crucial requirement for this to occur is that there must be a large enough population of CRUs in the cell that have not already been activated. If this condition is not met, then Ca2+ waves will abort since they will quickly encounter regions of the cell that have recently released Ca2+ and are refractory. Therefore, an essential condition for the formation of triggered waves is the presence of a large population of available CRUs shortly after the AP upstroke. Under normal pacing conditions, the number of available CRUs following the AP upstroke is low since most CRUs have been triggered by LCC openings. However, under conditions of Ca2+ overload or rapid pacing, it is likely that the number of available CRUs is much larger than normal. There are two distinct mechanisms for this to occur. First, the open probability of LCCs during the AP plateau may be much smaller than normal so that only a few LCCs open to trigger Ca2+ sparks, because high diastolic Ca2+ levels during rapid pacing will induce Ca2+-induced inactivation of LCCs and reduce their open probability. Furthermore, elevated diastolic Ca2+ increases the likelihood of Ca2+ wave propagation, since RyR open probability increases with Ca2+ concentration. Secondly, the response of CRUs to LCC openings is a sharp threshold function of the SR load24 so that the availability of CRUs depends on the time course of the SR reloading. Consequently, triggered waves can occur if the SR load is below some threshold immediately following an AP upstroke but then crosses that threshold during the ensuing AP. In this case, the timing of the triggered waves is dependent on the time course of the SR load immediately following the AP upstroke.

The mechanisms described above can explain the presence of triggered waves during heart failure. In these cells, E–C coupling is disrupted due to an abnormal t-tubule pattern, which leaves a large number of RyRs that can no longer be triggered by LCC channel openings.25,26 Thus, LCC openings in a large number of CRUs are insufficient to induce Ca2+ release. This leaves a large population of CRUs that can support a Ca2+ wave, thus promoting triggered waves. Furthermore, elevated diastolic Ca2+ in heart failure ensures that the number of LCC openings is reduced due to Ca2+-induced inactivation, while RyR channels are more prone to induce and support Ca2+ waves.

5. Triggered waves as a novel mechanism of early afterdepolarizations

An important and novel feature of triggered waves is that they occur during the AP, whereas spontaneous waves occur only during diastole. Thus, the timing of spontaneous Ca2+ waves suggests their involvement in DADs while triggered waves might also be involved in the induction of early afterdepolarizations (EADs), depending on the timing of the first triggered spark. This mechanism for EADs is novel as it is generally believed that EADs are due to a voltage-dependent mechanism involving Ca2+ and K+ currents, although there is some evidence that SR Ca2+ release, and perhaps even Ca2+ waves, may cause EADs.14 Certainly, the timing of triggered waves is consistent with this intriguing notion since these Ca2+ release events are both large and late during systole, so that the inward current generated late during the AP plateau could be sufficient in both timing and magnitude to provide enough inward current to produce a late Phase-2 or -3 depolarization. However, if it is in fact true that EADs might also occur as the result of Ca2+ cycling, possibly arising from triggered waves, then this behaviour should respond quite readily to pharmacological interventions which target intracellular Ca2+ cycling that is independent of traditional notions of SR Ca2+ overload, since this is not a requirement for triggered waves as it is for spontaneous Ca2+ waves.

6. Triggered waves and arrhythmias: role of ectopic foci

How might triggered waves contribute to cardiac arrhythmias? In order for an ectopic beat to occur due to triggered Ca2+ waves, it will be necessary that these events occur in large cell populations. For this to occur, a triggered wave should occur within a critical fraction of cells in tissue, at roughly the same time, in order to summate to overcome the electrotonic current drain to the surrounding cells. It is possible for this to occur if the frequency of triggered waves is high. This is precisely what we would expect in Ca2+ overload and heart failure where, as observed experimentally, the frequency of triggered waves increased dramatically. A particularly important feature of triggered waves is that they occur during systole at rapid rates. Thus, the timing variability of these events is naturally less than that of spontaneous Ca2+ waves, which can occur over a much longer time interval during diastole. Thus, it may be possible that during rapid pacing, triggered waves can occur nearly simultaneously in many cells. Also, it is important to consider that an ectopic excitation due to triggered waves may be more dangerous than that due to spontaneous Ca2+ waves, because triggered waves can occur at short time intervals after an AP upstroke. Therefore, the coupling interval between a triggered excitation and the previous paced beat can occur during or towards the end of the AP so that the ensuing wave front will closely follow the wave back of the preceding beat and will have a higher likelihood of propagation failure. Hence, we expect that ectopic foci due to triggered waves would have a higher probability of leading to wave break and fibrillation.

7. Triggered waves and arrhythmias: formation of a dynamic substrate

Wave break occurs when ectopic excitation propagates in cardiac tissue with a non-uniform AP duration (APD) distribution. In particular, if there are large gradients in APD, then a triggered excitation can propagate into a region where a short APD occurred, whereas block occurs in a refractory region following a long APD. Triggered waves can lead to a heterogeneous distribution of APD, since they occur during an AP and therefore significantly change the APD on a beat-to-beat basis. Thus, if a region of tissue exhibits a larger than average fraction of triggered waves on a certain beat, then the APD in this region may be significantly larger than in neighbouring regions. Another mechanism for the formation of a heterogeneous APD substrate is that since Ca2+ and voltage are bi-directionally coupled, triggered waves destabilize the periodic response of the APD. Thus, a triggered Ca2+ wave between beats will typically induce an increase in the APD. This effect will then feed back on Ca2+ on the next beat, since a larger APD in one beat will tend to lead to reduced LCC current in the next, owing to the shorter diastolic interval. Furthermore, a triggered Ca2+ wave will deplete the SR and prevent Ca2+ release on the next beat. Thus, we expect that a triggered wave will disrupt the dynamics of voltage and Ca2+ under rapid pacing conditions. In the tissue setting, this will lead to spatial gradients in APD, since different cells will respond differently to rapid pacing, preventing spatiotemporal synchronization of the voltage and Ca2+ response. This mechanism is similar to spatially discordant APD alternans where one region of tissue alternates in a long–short–long–short pattern, while a neighbouring region alternates out of phase (short–long–short–long). Here, we expect an even more complex dynamic pattern, as triggered waves will disrupt the non-linear response of both voltage and Ca2+ cycling.

8. Conclusions

Numerous studies have shown that various cardiac arrhythmias are initiated by triggered excitations that are caused by SCR. However, it is not well understood how Ca2+ release at the single-cell level can lead to triggered activity in tissue. In this manuscript, we described several ideas that are necessary to understand the precise connection between subcellular Ca2+ and the triggers for arrhythmias in the heart. In particular, the timing distribution of SCR within a large cell population in tissue is the key factor that determines whether SCR activity can summate to form ectopic foci. Moreover, it is the time course of SR calcium release that determines the variance of this distribution and that is the critical factor to determine the likelihood of triggered activity. Insights gained from these studies suggest novel gene-based or pharmacological treatments that seek to target the formation of dangerous ectopic beats. For example, our work has identified the rate of SR Ca2+ refilling as a potential therapeutic target since it controls the relative synchrony of SCR in a population of cells. Furthermore, we have described ‘triggered waves’ which may be highly arrhythmogenic since they occur early in the AP and thus can induce propagating excitations that are more likely to undergo wave break. Also, owing to their early onset, triggered waves provide a putative mechanism for EADs that has not been described before. These findings should stimulate further exploration of these complex spatiotemporal features of Ca2+ and their connection with cardiac arrhythmias.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Cardiovascular Research online.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant #R01HL101196) and the American Heart Association Grant 0830298N.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

References

  • 1.Xie Y, Sato D, Garfinkel A, Qu Z, Weiss JN. So little source, so much sink: requirements for afterdepolarizations to propagate in tissue. Biophys J. 2010;99:1408–1415. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wit AL, Rosen MR. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias. Am Heart J. 1983;106:798–811. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(83)90003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gilmour RF, Jr, Moise NS. Triggered activity as a mechanism for inherited ventricular arrhythmias in German shepherd Dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1526–1533. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00618-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Janse MJ. Electrophysiological changes in heart failure and their relationship to arrhythmogenesis. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61:208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wehrens XH, Lehnart SE, Marks AR. Intracellular calcium release and cardiac disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2005;67:69–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.67.040403.114521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cerrone M, Noujaim SF, Tolkacheva EG, Talkachou A, O'Connell R, Berenfeld O, et al. Arrhythmogenic mechanisms in a mouse model of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circ Res. 2007;101:1039–1048. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.148064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clusin WT. Calcium and cardiac arrhythmias: DADs, EADs, and alternans. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2003;40:337–375. doi: 10.1080/713609356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pogwizd SM, Bers DM. Cellular basis of triggered arrhythmias in heart failure. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2004;14:61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2003.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chudin E, Goldhaber J, Garfinkel A, Weiss J, Kogan B. Intracellular Ca(2+) dynamics and the stability of ventricular tachycardia. Biophys J. 1999;77:2930–2941. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77126-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bers DM. Cardiac excitation–contraction coupling. Nature. 2002;415:198–205. doi: 10.1038/415198a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bers DM, Lederer WJ, Berlin JR. Intracellular Ca transients in rat cardiac myocytes: role of Na–Ca exchange in excitation–contraction coupling. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:C944–C954. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1990.258.5.C944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schlotthauer K, Bers DM. Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) release causes myocyte depolarization. Underlying mechanism and threshold for triggered action potentials. Circ Res. 2000;87:774–780. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.9.774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ferrier GR, Moe GK. Effect of calcium on acetylstrophanthidin-induced transient depolarizations in canine Purkinje tissue. Circ Res. 1973;33:508–515. doi: 10.1161/01.res.33.5.508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Burashnikov A, Antzelevitch C. Late-phase 3 EAD. A unique mechanism contributing to initiation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29:290–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00336.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wasserstrom JA, Shiferaw Y, Chen W, Ramakrishna S, Patel H, Kelly JE, et al. Variability in timing of spontaneous calcium release in the intact rat heart is determined by the time course of sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium load. Circ Res. 2010;107:1117–1126. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.229294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen W, Aistrup G, Wasserstrom JA, Shiferaw Y. A mathematical model of spontaneous calcium release in cardiac myocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;300:H1794–H1805. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01121.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stuyvers BD, Boyden PA, ter Keurs HE. Calcium waves: physiological relevance in cardiac function. Circ Res. 2000;86:1016–1018. doi: 10.1161/01.res.86.10.1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Takamatsu T, Wier WG. Calcium waves in mammalian heart: quantification of origin, magnitude, waveform, and velocity. FASEB J. 1990;4:1519–1525. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.4.5.2307330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen W, Wasserstrom JA, Shiferaw Y. Role of coupled gating between cardiac ryanodine receptors in the genesis of triggered arrhythmias. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297:H171–H180. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00098.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ferrier GR, Saunders JH, Mendez C. A cellular mechanism for the generation of ventricular arrhythmias by acetylstrophanthidin. Circ Res. 1973;32:600–609. doi: 10.1161/01.res.32.5.600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fujiwara K, Tanaka H, Mani H, Nakagami T, Takamatsu T. Burst emergence of intracellular Ca2+ waves evokes arrhythmogenic oscillatory depolarization via the Na+–Ca2+ exchanger: simultaneous confocal recording of membrane potential and intracellular Ca2+ in the heart. Circ Res. 2008;103:509–518. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.176677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wasserstrom JA, Sharma R, Kapur S, Kelly JE, Kadish AH, Balke CW, et al. Multiple defects in intracellular calcium cycling in whole failing rat heart. Circ Heart Fail. 2009;2:223–232. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.811539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kapur S, Aistrup GL, Sharma R, Kelly JE, Arora R, Zheng J, et al. Early development of intracellular calcium cycling defects in intact hearts of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299:H1843–H1853. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00623.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jiang D, Xiao B, Yang D, Wang R, Choi P, Zhang L, et al. RyR2 mutations linked to ventricular tachycardia and sudden death reduce the threshold for store-overload-induced Ca2+ release (SOICR) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:13062–13067. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402388101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Song LS, Sobie EA, McCulle S, Lederer WJ, Balke CW, Cheng H. Orphaned ryanodine receptors in the failing heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:4305–4310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509324103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.He J, Conklin MW, Foell JD, Wolff MR, Haworth RA, Coronado R, et al. Reduction in density of transverse tubules and L-type Ca(2+) channels in canine tachycardia-induced heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;49:298–307. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(00)00256-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data
Download video file (18.7MB, avi)

Articles from Cardiovascular Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES