Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology
. 2012 Apr 25;303(2):F201–F208. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00140.2012

Glycoforms of UT-A3 urea transporter with poly-N-acetyllactosamine glycosylation have enhanced transport activity

Hua Su 1, Conner B Carter 1, Otto Fröhlich 2, Richard D Cummings 3, Guangping Chen 1,
PMCID: PMC3404584  PMID: 22535801

Abstract

Urea transporters UT-A1 and UT-A3 are both expressed in the kidney inner medulla. However, the function of UT-A3 remains unclear. Here, we found that UT-A3, which comprises only the NH2-terminal half of UT-A1, has a higher urea transport activity than UT-A1 in the oocyte and that this difference was associated with differences in N-glycosylation. Heterologously expressed UT-A3 is fully glycosylated with two glycoforms of 65 and 45 kDa. By contrast, UT-A1 expressed in HEK293 cells and oocytes exhibits only a 97-kDa glycosylation form. We further found that N-glycans of UT-A3 contain a large amount of poly-N-acetyllactosamine. This highly glycosylated UT-A3 is more stable and is enriched in lipid raft domains on the cell membrane. Kifunensine, an inhibitor of α-mannosidase that inhibits N-glycan processing beyond high-mannose-type N-glycans, significantly reduced UT-A3 urea transport activity. We then examined the native UT-A1 and UT-A3 glycosylation states from kidney inner medulla and found the ratio of 65 to 45 kDa in UT-A3 is higher than that of 117 to 97 kDa in UT-A1. The highly stable expression of highly glycosylated UT-A3 on the cell membrane in kidney inner medulla suggests that UT-A3 may have an important function in urea reabsorption.

Keywords: N-glycan, urine concentration, urea absorption, vasopressin, inner medulla


urea is one of the most important solutes contributing to the medullary osmolarity gradient in the kidney. Rapid urea reabsorption in the terminal inner medulla collecting duct (IMCD) is mediated by a specialized facilitative urea transporter (UT) protein (10, 24). This process is critically important for the kidney to maintain medullary hypertonicity and enable maximal urinary concentration to occur, and therefore plays an important role in the maintenance of water and nitrogen balance (24).

The first UT gene was cloned in 1993 (38). At present, two mammalian UT subfamilies have been reported, the renal tubular-type urea transporter UT-A and the erythrocyte-vascular-type urea transporter UT-B (24). UT-A has six splicing isoforms; the longest form is UT-A1 with an open reading frame of 929 amino acids in rat. Two other forms of the transporter are also expressed, UT-A3, which represents an NH2-terminal half of UT-A1, and UT-A2, which represents a COOH-terminal half of UT-A1 (3, 16). UT-A1 and UT-A3 are both expressed in the IMCD and are believed to contribute to the very high urea permeability of the IMCD (10). UT-A2 is expressed in the descending thin limb of the loop of Henle and involved in urea recycling between the interstitium and the loop of Henle (34).

UT-A1 has been extensively investigated. It is expressed in the IMCD epithelial cells and plays a critical role in the urinary concentrating mechanism, as demonstrated by UT-A1/UT-A3 knockout mice that have a seriously impaired urinary concentrating ability (10). Vasopressin (also known as antidiuretic hormone) is the major hormone that regulates UT-A1 activity in vivo. Vasopressin rapidly regulates IMCD urea transport activity by increasing UT-A1 phosphorylation (39) and membrane trafficking (18). UT-A1 expressed in the inner medulla (IM) exhibits two different glycosylation forms that differ in size, 97 and 117 kDa; both are derived from a single 88-kDa core protein (5). It was believed that these two glycoforms of UT-A1 are the mature glycosylation forms, since they are both insensitive to endoglycosidase H treatment (5). However, our recent study shows that the 117-kDa form is more heavily glycosylated and contains poly-N-acetyllactosamine (poly-LacNAc) (8), whereas the 97-kDa form is a hybrid form containing a high amount of mannose (8). For unknown reasons, upon heterologous expression of UT-A1 in Xenopus laevis oocytes (8), Chinese hamster ovary (15), Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) (8, 11), and HEK293 (14) cells, only the 97-kDa form appears.

UT-A3 from rat kidney encodes a 460-amino acid protein comprising the NH2-terminal part of UT-A1 (16). Both UT-A1 and UT-A3 are transcribed from the same promoter (16, 21). Although both UT-A1 and UT-A3 are highly expressed in IMCD, their distribution is slightly different. In situ hybridization (27) and immunohistostaining (33) demonstrate that UT-A3 is only detectable in the deep part of the IM (IM tip), whereas UT-A1 is distributed over the entire IM (IM tip and base). Immunoblots with UT-A3 antibody by Terris et al. (33) identify two bands at ∼44 and ∼67 kDa in the IM. Upon removal of N-glycans by treatment with PNGase, these two bands disappear and yield a single band at 40 kDa.

The exact function and cellular location of UT-A3 in the kidney remains controversial. The large abundance of UT-A3 protein in the IMCD suggests it may also be important in handling renal urea. Because UT-A1 is expressed in the apical membrane of IMCD epithelial cells and mediates urea reabsorption from the tubular lumen, one possible function for UT-A3 in the IMCD is that it could serve as the basolateral UT, permitting urea to exit from the cells (27, 29). Indeed, Stewart et al. (30, 31) showed that UT-A3 is in the basolateral membrane in mouse kidney IMCD cells, and basolateral urea flux is detected from mUT-A3-MDCK cells. However, Terris et al. (33) showed that UT-A3 is located in the apical membrane in rat kidney IMCD cells. The double immunostaining revealed no overlap of UT-A3 with Na-K-ATPase at the basolateral surface, making it unlikely that UT-A3 represents the basolateral UT, at least in rat (33).

In freshly prepared suspensions of rat IMCD, forskolin treatment increases the UT-A3 abundance in the plasma membrane (PM) and phosphorylation, similar to UT-A1 (4). Although UT-A1 and UT-A3 are both expressed in the apical membrane of epithelial cell in rat IMCD, a study by Blount and coworkers (4) showed that these two transporters do not form a complex through a protein-protein interaction, suggesting that UT-A1 and UT-A3 function independently as separate transporters. Truly, they function independently in heterologous expression in oocytes (8, 27) and cultured cells (11, 30), indicating that their individual function does not require the presence of one another. Because UT-A1 and UT-A3 share the same promoter, it is impossible to generate solely a UT-A1 or UT-A3 knockout mouse. Deletion of UT-A1 exon 10 results in a mouse lacking both UT-A1 and UT-A3 (10). In the absence of a UT-A3-deficient mouse, it is not possible to evaluate the role of UT-A3 in vivo. Thus, there is limited knowledge of the function of UT-A3 in inner medullary urea reabsorption and urinary concentration.

Although UT-A3 represents only the NH2-terminal half of UT-A1, it exhibits a high urea transport activity in vitro (27). In this study, we have examined the functional role of N-glycosylation in UT-A1 vs. UT-A3 and found that differential glycosylation, and especially the content of poly-LacNAc in N-glycans in UT-A3, is associated with stabilization of UT-A3 and its increased urea transport activity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmids.

Rat UT-A1 and UT-A3 cDNAs coding the full-length protein were initially subcloned into p3XFLAG-CMV-10 vector (Sigma) in HindIII/EcoRI sites, then the genes, including the NH2-terminal fused triple FLAG tag (FLAG-UT-A1 and FLAG-UT-A3), were subcloned into mammalian expression vector pcDNA3. All of the constructs were verified by nucleotide sequence analysis.

Cell culture, transfection, and treatment.

HEK293 cells were routinely cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS at 37°C in 5% CO2. Plasmids were transfected by Lipofectamine (Invitrogen). For the protein degradation study, the cells were incubated with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide (Calbiochem) and chased for 18 h. After treatment, the cells were collected, solubilized in RIPA buffer, and processed for Western blot analysis.

Lipid raft isolation.

HEK293 cells grown in 10-cm plates were transfected with pcDNA3-FLAG-UT-A1 or pcDNA3-FLAG-UT-A3. After 48 h, cells were lysed in ice-cold 0.5% Brij96/TNEV buffer (10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM sodium vanadate, and protease inhibitor cocktail) for 30 min on ice. Cell membrane lipid raft fractionations were performed with a 5–40% sucrose discontinuous gradient as reported previously (8). Equal sizes of fractions (∼400 μl) were collected from the top to bottom and analyzed by Western blot.

Glycosidase PNGase F treatment.

For removal of N-glycans from glycoproteins, lipid raft membrane fractions (fractions 2∼4) were first denatured in 0.5% SDS and 1% β-mercaptoethanol by boiling for 10 min and subsequently digested with PNGase F (New England Biolabs) at 37°C for 2 h. The samples were then processed for Western blot.

Lectin pulldown assay.

Equal amounts of cell or tissue lysates were incubated with 25 μl of lectin suspensions at 4°C overnight. After being washed, the precipitated samples were boiled in 35 μl of Laemmli buffer and used for Western blot with UT-A1 or FLAG antibodies. Agarose-bound concanavalin A (ConA), wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), Sambucus nigra lectin (SNA), Aleuria aurantia lectin (AAL), Phaseolus vulgaris leukoagglutinin, and tomato lectin (Lycopersicum esculentum lectin) all were purchased from Vector Laboratories.

Oocyte isolation, microinjection, and urea flux.

X. laevis oocytes were prepared and maintained in OR3 medium as described previously (39). Capped UT-A1 and UT-A3 cRNAs were transcribed from linearized pGH19-UT-A1 or UT-A3 with T7 polymerase by using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Ultra Kit (Ambion). Five femtomoles of cRNA were injected into oocytes. For the kifunensine treatment, before cRNA injection, oocytes were preinjected with 23 ng kifunensine (Sigma) for 2 h. After 3 days, urea transport activity was measured by [14C]urea uptake (n = 6 oocytes/time point) as described (8). Protein expression from 10 cells/group was assessed by Western blot analysis.

Kidney IM tissue collection and Northern blot analysis.

Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories) weighing 125–200 g were used for evaluation of UT-A1 and UT-A3 mRNA expression. The IM was dissected from kidneys and cut in half as IM tip and IM base. Total RNA was extracted by TRIzol (Invitrogen). The RNA integrity was examined by RNA gel with ethidium bromide stain. Ten micrograms of RNA were used for electrophoresis and blotted on a Hybond-N+ nylon membrane (Amersham). A 2.7-kb fragment of rat UT-A1 cDNA containing the full-length UT-A1 coding region was used as a probe and labeled with [32P]dCTP (PerkinElmer) by the Megaprime DNA-labeling system (Amersham). The membrane was hybridized with the denatured UT-A1 cDNA probes in Rapid-hyb buffer (Amersham) for 2 h at 65°C. After being washed, the membrane was exposed to X-ray film. The signals of UT-A1 and UT-A3 were quantified by NIH ImageJ software. All animal protocols were reviewed and approved by the Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories) weighing 100–150 g received free access to water and standard rat chow (Purina).

IM tissue PM preparation.

PM isolation was performed by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation (8). IM tips from two rats were pooled and lysed in HB buffer (250 mM sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, and 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4) with a handheld Dounce homogenizer. After centrifugation for 5 min at 1,000 g, the supernatants were loaded on a five-step sucrose gradient (2.0, 1.6, 1.4, 1.2, and 0.8 M sucrose) and centrifuged in a SW28 rotor at 25,000 rpm for 2 h. PM was collected from the density interface of 1.2/0.8 M and diluted (1:3) in HB for further ultracentrifugation with a SW50.1 rotor at 30,000 rpm for 1 h. The pellets were resuspended in RIPA buffer and used for lectin pulldown experiments and for Western blot.

Western blot analysis.

Western blotting was performed as described (8). Blots were probed with primary antibody at 4°C overnight, followed by secondary anti-mouse or anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare) and developed by enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare). Anti-FLAG antibody was from Sigma. Anti-UT-A1 NH2-terminal antibody was described previously (8). Western blot band densities were quantitated with the NIH ImageJ.

Statistical analysis.

All values were expressed as means ± SD. Statistical analysis of the data was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey honest significant difference tests. Differences were considered as significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

UT-A3 exhibits a stronger activity than UT-A1 in Xenopus oocytes.

Structurally, UT-A1 is two times as large as UT-A3 and contains two urea-conducting units (UT-A3 and UT-A2) (Fig. 1A). To compare their activity, we normalized the injected cRNAs. Equal molar amounts (5 femtomol/oocyte) of UT-A1 (5 femtomol = 5.3 ng) or UT-A3 (5 femtomol = 2.8 ng) cRNAs were injected into oocytes. Although only one-half of UT-A1, UT-A3 has a higher urea transport rate than UT-A1 (Fig. 1B). The UT-A1 and UT-A3 protein expression level on the cell membrane was examined by surface biotinylation and followed by Western blot using a UT-A1 NH2-terminal antibody. UT-A1 exhibits a single band at 98 kDa, as described previously (8, 11, 14). Surprisingly, UT-A3 exhibits two major bands, a 45-kDa band and a broad band around 65 kDa (Fig. 1C). Figure 1D is the densitometric analysis of Fig. 1C from three independent experiments showing a significant amount of UT-A3 membrane expression.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Urea transport mediated by urea transporter (UT)-A1 and UT-A3 in oocytes. A: structure showing that UT-A3 is the NH2-terminal half of UT-A1. B: urea flux. The same amount (5 femtomol·23 nl−1·oocyte−1) of UT-A1 and UT-A3 cRNAs was injected in the oocyte. Later (3 days), urea transport activity was measured by [14C]urea uptake for 1 and 3 min (mean ± SD, n = 6 oocytes/time point, **P < 0.01). C: analysis of protein expression. UT-A1 and UT-A3 protein expression on the cell membrane was examined by biotinylation and followed by Western blot with a UT-A1 NH2-terminal antibody. D: quantification of C. Membrane (biotinylated) UT-A1 and UT-A3 proteins were quantified and assessed as %total UT protein from 3 independent experiments (mean ± SD, n = 3, *P < 0.05).

UT-A3 is expressed in lipid raft domains at the cell membrane.

We previously reported that the highly glycosylated 117-kDa glycoforms of UT-A1 from kidney are preferably localized in lipid raft microdomains (8); thus, we examined the lipid raft association of UT-A3 expressed in HEK293 cells. FLAG-tagged UT-A3 and UT-A1 (as a control) were transiently transfected into HEK293 cells. After 48 h, lipid rafts were isolated by using the nonionic detergent Brij96. UT-A1 only shows a 98-kDa form (Fig. 2A). UT-A3 demonstrates two glycoforms at 45 and 65 kDa. The more highly glycosylated UT-A3 is solely distributed in lipid raft domains (Fig. 2A), similar to the lipid raft distribution of 117-kDa UT-A1 from kidney IM (8).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Distribution of UT-A3 in lipid raft domains. A: lipid raft experiments. UT-A1 with an NH2-terminal fused triple FLAG tag (FLAG-UT-A1) and UT-A3 were transiently transfected into HEK293 cells. Later (2 days), the cells were lysed in 0.5% Brij96. The lipid raft fractions were isolated from a 5–40% sucrose gradient and probed with FLAG antibody. IB, immunoblot. B: PNGase F digestion. Lipid raft fractions 2–4 were collected and deglycosylated by PNGase F at 37°C for 2 h. The samples were processed for Western blot with FLAG antibody. The results are representative of 3 independent experiments.

To confirm that the two UT-A3 bands are due to the different extents of glycosylation, we collected membrane fractions 2–4 and processed for PNGase F digestion. After removal of N-glycans, the two bands collapsed to a single band at 40 kDa (Fig. 2B). As a control, after deglycosylation treatment, the 98-kDa UT-A1 shifted to 88 kDa.

The 65-kDa glycoform of UT-A3 contains high amounts of poly-LacNAc.

Because the UT-A3 glycoform has a single predicted N-glycosylation site at Asn279, the high apparent molecular weight of that form is likely to be due to a large-sized N-glycan. Typically, such very large N-glycans contain long repeats of the disaccharide [3Galβ1–4GlcNAcβ1-]n, which is known as poly-LacNAc. To explore the N-glycan structure of UT-A1 and UT-A3, we collected UT-A1 and UT-A3 lipid raft fractions 2–4 and performed pulldown assays by using different lectins that recognized different structural determinants in glycans. As shown in Fig. 3, the 97-kDa UT-A1 is bound by both ConA and WGA. These lectins bind glycans with high contents of mannose or N-acetylglucosamine/sialic acid, respectively (6, 2, 20, 23, 1). By contrast, the 45-kDa glycoforms of UT-A3 were mainly pulled down by ConA, indicating a significant amount of mannose, whereas the 65-kDa glycoforms of UT-A3 were pulled down by WGA and tomato lectin, which binds preferentially to glycans with long poly-LacNAc chains (19). These results indicate that the 65-kDa glycoform of UT-A3 has GlcNAc/sialic acid and poly-LacNAc. The glycoforms of both UT-A1 and UT-A3 expressed in HEK293 cells bind weakly to SNA, which specifically binds sialic acid-linked α2–6 to galactose (28). Interestingly, these glycoforms differ in fucosylation, since UT-A1, but not UT-A3, was efficiently precipitated by AAL, a lectin that efficiently binds α-linked fucose (37).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Lectin pulldown assay. A: lectin pulldown assay. Lipid raft fractions 2–4 were collected and diluted 3-fold with RIPA buffer. Next, equal amounts of the fractions were incubated with 30 μl lectin beads overnight at 4°C. After being washed, the samples were eluted by Laemmli buffer and analyzed by Western blot with FLAG antibody. B: quantification of protein lectin binding from two independent experiments (mean ± SD, n = 2). ConA, concanavalin A; WGA, wheat germ agglutinin; SNA, Sambucus nigra lectin; AAL, Aleuria aurantia lectin.

Kifunensine reduces UT-A3 urea transport activity.

To confirm whether the mature glycosylation is important for the increased UT activity of UT-A3, we preinjected Xenopus oocytes with kifunensine for 2 h. Kifunensine inhibits ER α-mannosidase I (9), which prevents further maturation of N-glycans, resulting in accumulation of high-mannose-type N-glycans. As seen in Fig. 4A, kifunensine treatment significantly reduced UT-A3, as well as UT-A1, urea transport activity. The effect of kifunensine on UT-A1 and UT-A3 glycan structure was examined by lectin pulldown. UT-A1 expressed in oocytes was efficiently precipitated by ConA, and weakly by WGA, and not by other lectins (Fig. 4B). The relatively immature N-glycosylation of UT-A1 when expressed in oocytes could be one of the reasons why it has lower activity. By contrast, UT-A3 glycosylation was hardly recognized by ConA, indicating that the N-glycans were highly processed, as confirmed by the efficient precipitation with both WGA and tomato lectin. After kifunensine treatment, both UT-A1 and UT-A3 were precipitated only by ConA, and, notably, the high-molecular-weight form of UT-A3 seen in the absence of kifunensine was not observed (Fig. 4B). These results demonstrate that UT-A3, but not UT-A1, when expressed in oocytes acquired poly-LacNAc chains and has more highly processed N-glycans compared with those in UT-A1.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Kifunensine (Kifu) treatment. A: urea flux. The oocytes were preinjected with or without kifunensine (23 ng/oocyte) for 2 h, and then equal molar amounts of UT-A1 or UT-A3 were injected. Later (3 days), urea transport activity was measured by [14C]urea uptake (mean ± SD, n = 6 oocytes, **P < 0.01). B: lectin pulldown. Equal amounts of cell lysates were incubated with lectin beads overnight at 4°C. After being washed, the pulled down proteins were examined by Western blot with UT-A1 antibody. The results are representative of 3 independent experiments.

Fully glycosylated 65-kDa UT-A3 has extended half-life time.

One of the important roles of N-glycosylation is to increase protein stability (7). To investigate this possibility in relation to UT-A3, FLAG-UT-A3 and UT-A1 were transfected into HEK293 cells. After 2 days, the cells were treated with cycloheximide to block synthesis of new protein, and the total protein expression of UT-A3 was chased for 18 h. As shown in Fig. 5, the lower glycosylated 45-kDa UT-A3 exhibited faster turnover with a half-life time of ∼10 h, the same as UT-A1; by contrast, the high glycosylated 65-kDa UT-A3 was more stable with an extended half-life time >18 h.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Analysis of UT-A3 protein degradation. A: Western blot analysis. FLAG-UT-A1 and UT-A3 were transiently transfected into HEK293 cells. Later (2 days), the cells were treated with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) for the indicated time. The cells were lysed in RIPA buffer, and the UT-A1 and UT-A3 protein levels were evaluated by Western blot with FLAG antibody. B: densitometric analysis of Western blot results from 3 independent experiments (mean ± SD, n = 3).

Differential mRNA and protein expression of UT-A3 in IM.

To compare these results on in vivo expressed glycoforms of UT-A1 and UT-A3, we examined native UT-A3 expression in the kidney. Northern blots demonstrated that UT-A3 is only present in the IM tip, whereas UT-A1 exists in both IM tip and base. This is consistent with prior studies using in situ hybridization (27). We quantified UT-A1 and UT-A3 mRNA expression in the IM tip. UT-A3 is only about one-fifth as abundant as UT-A1 (Fig. 6A). At the protein level, the total UT-A3 abundance (65 + 45 kDa) appears to be only slightly lower than that of UT-A1 (117 + 97 kDa) (Fig. 6B). Unlike the heterologously expressed UT-A1, the native UT-A1 from kidney tissue appears to be two major glycoforms, including the highly glycosylated form of 117 kDa that is bound by both WGA and tomato lectin, and thus has a high content of both GlcNAc/sialic acid and poly-LacNAc (8) (Fig. 6C). We prepared cell PM and then carefully examined UT-A3 and UT-A1 expression on the cell PM. The UT-A3 ratio of 65 to 45 kDa is higher than that of 117–97 kDa in UT-A1 (Fig. 6B), indicating that UT-A3 on the cell membrane is heavily glycosylated. As expected, the 65-kDa UT-A3 on the cell membrane is efficiently pulled down by both WGA and tomato lectin, which indicates that the 65-kDa glycoform contains high amounts of both GlcNAc/sialic acid and poly-LacNAc (Fig. 6C).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

UT-A3 expression in kidney inner medulla (IM). A: Northern blot hybridization. Total RNA samples extracted from kidney IM tip and base were hybridized with [32P]dCTP-labeled UT-A1 cDNA probe. The bar graph shows the quantification of the signals of UT-A1 and UT-A3 from the IM tip (mean ± SD, n = 3, **P < 0.01). B: UT-A3 protein expression from total tissue lysates or plasma membrane (PM). The PM samples from 3 rat IM tips were isolated by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation and analyzed by Western blot with UT-A1 antibody. The bar graph (arbitrary units, ×1,000) shows the quantification of total UT-A1 and UT-A3 protein abundance from lysates. C: lectin pulldown assay. IM tip PM samples from 3 rats were incubated with 30 μl lectin beads overnight at 4°C. UT-A1 and UT-A3 in the precipitated samples were detected by Western blot with UT-A1 antibody. PHA-L, Phaseolus vulgaris leukoagglutinin.

DISCUSSION

Glycosylation is a key posttranslational modification that can affect the structure and function of glycoproteins. We (8, 7) and others (36) have shown that the state of glycosylation is related to UT-A1 activity. UT-A1 from kidney IM is fully glycosylated and appears as two glycoforms: 97 and 117 kDa (5, 8). Animal experiments show that these two forms are regulated differentially in different pathological conditions. The 117-kDa form increases dramatically in several states associated with decreased urea concentration, such as streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus (17), low-protein diet (32), hypercalcemia (25), water diuresis (32), and furosemide administration (32). These changes could reflect the fact that the kidney increases urea transport activity in response to the specific needs under crucial situations. Indeed, a tubule perfusion study of IMCD from diuretic rats shows that the appearance of the 117-kDa isoform is associated with increased urea permeability (36). Therefore, the change in the relative abundance of the 97- and 117-kDa forms of UT-A1 may play important roles in regulating UT-A1 function in vivo. Direct evidence demonstrates that inhibition of glycosylation by tunicamycin or elimination of the two glycosylation sites within UT-A1 at Asn279 and Asn742 by mutation significantly affects UT-A1 membrane trafficking and lipid raft expression and reduces UT-A1 protein stability and urea transport activity (8, 7).

Both UT-A1 and UT-A3 are highly expressed in the terminal IMCD. Because UT-A1 is the longest form among the three kidney isoforms of UT-A1, UT-A2, and UT-A3, it has been more extensively studied and is believed to play a key function in urea reabsorption from the apical membrane of IMCD cells (10, 22). By contrast, the role of UT-A3 in kidney urea reabsorption and intrarenal urea recycling has not been well explored. A decade ago, Shayakul et al. (27) observed that urea transport mediated by UT-A3 has higher uptake levels than that by UT-A1 in oocyte expression. However, they did not examine the protein expression of these two transporters, and the possible mechanism was not addressed (27). Structurally, UT-A1 is two times as large as UT-A3. It is not clear at present how UT-A3, which represents the NH2-terminal half of UT-A1, has more urea transport activity compared with UT-A1. In this study, we further compared these two transporters by comparing their transport functions at similar expression levels and found that the single UT-A3 molecule had a higher activity than that of UT-A1, which is consistent with the finding reported by Shayakul et al. (27). Strikingly, protein analysis by Western blot shows that, in addition to a 45-kDa band, UT-A3 has a heavily glycosylated broad band around 65 kDa. UT-A1 has only the low glycosylated 97-kDa band as seen before (8). It is well known that maturation of glycosylation is linked to proper function in many glycosylated proteins (12, 13, 35, 26). We propose that the mature glycosylation form of UT-A3 could be contributing to the increased activity. This was confirmed by treatment with kifunensine (Fig. 4), which shows that blocking glycosylation maturation significantly reduces UT-A3 urea transport activity.

We observed that UT-A3, which possesses the same amino acid sequence as the NH2-terminal half of UT-A1, is glycosylated differently from UT-A1. Only a lower glycosylated 97-kDa UT-A1 has been identified in heterologous expression (8, 15, 11, 14), whereas UT-A3, as shown in this study, can get fully glycosylated in both oocytes and HEK293 cells. We previously reported that N-glycosylation facilitates UT-A1 lipid raft expression (8). Consistently, we observed that the highly glycosylated 65 kDa of UT-A3 shows preferential association with lipid raft domains, similar to the lipid raft distribution of the 117-kDa UT-A1 from kidney IM (8). Targeting to lipid raft microdomains is important for membrane protein apical trafficking in polarized epithelial cells (8). Thus the high glycosylation of UT-A3 may enhance its membrane expression by facilitating transporter targeting to lipid rafts. We compared the glycan structures of UT-A1 and UT-A3 from cell membrane lipid raft fractions. The 97-kDa UT-A1 glycan mainly contains less mature N-glycans rich in mannose and GlcNAc/sialic acid as reported in MDCK cells (8). The low band of UT-A3 is primarily a mannose-rich glycoforms that is only bound by ConA. As expected, the larger band of 65 kDa UT-A3 contains a large amount of GlcNAc/sialic acid, and particularly poly-LacNAc, as it is bound efficiently by both WGA and tomato lectin, respectively. However, UT-A1 also has a significant amount of fucose, a feature not seen in UT-A3. The mechanism of differential processing of N-glycans in these different transporter forms is unclear and should be the subject of future studies.

In the current study, we also observed that the N-glycosylation differs between oocytes and HEK293 cells for both UT-A1 and UT-A3. In HEK293 cells, UT-A3 shows clearly the two different size bands at 45 and 65 kDa (Fig. 2, A and B), which is similar to the sizes observed in kidney IM. UT-A3 expressed in oocytes has a 45-kDa band but with a broader smear of heterogeneous glycosylated forms. They are different glycosylation forms, since the high glycosylated UT-A3 smear disappeared after kifunensine treatment (Fig. 4B). Also, the 97-kDa UT-A1 expressed in MDCK cells contains significant amounts of GlcNAc/sialic acid (8), but it has very low GlcNAc/sialic acid in oocytes (Fig. 4B), much more immature than in MDCK (8) and HEK293 cells (Fig. 3). This may be related to the very low transport activity of UT-A1 compared with UT-A3, especially in oocytes.

The finding that UT-A3 has enhanced activity linked to a high level of glycosylation and poly-LacNAc content may have important physiological significance. Although both UT-A1 and UT-A3 are expressed in IM, UT-A3 is more concentrated in the terminal IMCD. Interestingly, at the mRNA level, we found that UT-A3 is only one-fifth of UT-A1 in the IM tip, but UT-A3 protein abundance is only slightly lower than that of UT-A1. There are several possibilities for this, including that UT-A3 mRNA may be more stable and/or UT-A3 protein is more stable. In support of the latter, the 65-kDa UT-A3 has a significantly extended half-life time in this study (Fig. 5). Another interesting finding is that the highly glycosylated 65-kDa UT-A3 in the PM is more abundant than the 117-kDa UT-A1, strongly suggesting that UT-A3 may have more impact on controlling the final urea reabsorption in the terminal part of the kidney collecting duct.

In summary, the large abundance and codistribution of UT-A3 with UT-A1 in the terminal IMCD suggests that UT-A3 may play an important role in renal urea handling. Because of its small size (one-half of UT-A1) and being less explored, the functionality of UT-A3 may have been underappreciated for a long time. In this study, we found that the single UT-A3 molecule has much stronger transport activity than UT-A1. The mature glycosylation of UT-A3, with high amounts of poly-LacNAc, could contribute to the increased urea transport activity of UT-A3. Interestingly, relative to the low level of mRNA, we found that kidney IMCD actually has a high UT-A3 protein expression level, particularly the 65-kDa UT-A3 in PM fractions. Taken together, our study strongly suggests that UT-A3 may act as an effective UT and play a much more important role in kidney than thought to date. Further in vivo investigations are required to reevaluate the role of UT-A3 in kidney urea reabsorption and the urinary concentrating mechanism.

GRANTS

This work was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant R01-DK-087838 (to G. Chen).

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Author contributions: H.S. and C.B.C. performed experiments; H.S., O.F., R.D.C., and G.C. analyzed data; H.S., O.F., R.D.C., and G.C. interpreted results of experiments; H.S. and G.C. prepared figures; G.C. conception and design of research; G.C. drafted manuscript; G.C. edited and revised manuscript; G.C. approved final version of manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Allen AK, Neuberger A, Sharon N. The purification, composition and specificity of wheat-germ agglutinin. Biochem J 131: 155–162, 1973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Baenziger JU, Fiete D. Structural determinants of concanavalin A specificity for oligosaccharides. J Biol Chem 254: 2400–2407, 1979 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bagnasco SM, Peng T, Nakayama Y, Sands JM. Differential expression of individual UT-A urea transporter isoforms in rat kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 11: 1980–1986, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Blount MA, Klein JD, Martin CF, Tchapyjnikov D, Sands JM. Forskolin stimulates phosphorylation and membrane accumulation of UT-A3. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293: F1308–F1313, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bradford AD, Terris JM, Ecelbarger CA, Klein JD, Sands JM, Chou CL, Knepper MA. 97- and 117-kDa forms of collecting duct urea transporter UT-A1 are due to different states of glycosylation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 281: F133–F143, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Brewer CF, Bhattacharyya L. Specificity of concanavalin A binding to asparagine-linked glycopeptides. A nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion study. J Biol Chem 261: 7306–7310, 1986 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Chen G, Fröhlich O, Yang Y, Klein JD, Sands JM. Loss of N-linked glycosylation reduces urea transporter UT-A1 response to vasopressin. J Biol Chem 281: 27436–27442, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chen G, Howe AG, Xu G, Fröhlich O, Klein JD, Sands JM. Mature N-linked glycans facilitate UT-A1 urea transporter lipid raft compartmentalization. FASEB J 25: 4531–4539, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Elbein AD, Tropea JE, Mitchell M, Kaushal GP. Kifunensine, a potent inhibitor of the glycoprotein processing mannosidase I. J Biol Chem 265: 15599–15605, 1990 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fenton RA, Chou CL, Stewart GS, Smith CP, Knepper MA. Urinary concentrating defect in mice with selective deletion of phloretin-sensitive urea transporters in the renal collecting duct. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 7469–7474, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Fröhlich O, Klein JD, Smith PM, Sands JM, Gunn RB. Urea transport in MDCK cells that are stably transfected with UT-A1. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286: C1264–C1270, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Haeuptle MA, Hennet T. Congenital disorders of glycosylation: an update on defects affecting the biosynthesis of dolichol-linked oligosaccharides. Hum Mutat 30: 1628–1641, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hendriks G, Koudijs M, van Balkom BW, Oorschot V, Klumperman J, Deen PM, van der Sluijs P. Glycosylation is important for cell surface expression of the water channel aquaporin-2 but is not essential for tetramerization in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 279: 2975–2983, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Huang H, Feng X, Zhuang J, Fröhlich O, Klein JD, Cai H, Sands JM, Chen G. Internalization of UT-A1 urea transporter is dynamin dependent and mediated by both caveolae and clathrin coated pit pathways. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 299: F1389–F1395, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Huang H, Yang Y, Eaton DC, Sands JM, Chen G. The N-terminal 81-aa fragment is critical for UT-A1 urea transporter bioactivity. J Epithel Biol Pharmacol 3: 34–39, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Karakashian A, Timmer RT, Klein JD, Gunn RB, Sands JM, Bagnasco SM. Cloning and characterization of two new isoforms of the rat kidney urea transporter: UT-A3 and UT-A4. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 230–237, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kim D, Sands JM, Klein JD. Changes in renal medullary transport proteins during uncontrolled diabetes mellitus in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 285: F303–F309, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Klein JD, Fröhlich O, Blount MA, Martin CF, Smith TD, Sands JM. Vasopressin increases plasma membrane accumulation of urea transporter UT-A1 in rat inner medullary collecting ducts. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 2680–2686, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Merkle RK, Cummings RD. Relationship of the terminal sequences to the length of poly-N-acetyllactosamine chains in asparagine-linked oligosaccharides from the mouse lymphoma cell line BW5147. Immobilized tomato lectin interacts with high affinity with glycopeptides containing long poly-N-acetyllactosamine chains. J Biol Chem 262: 8179–8189, 1987 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Naismith JH, Field RA. Structural basis of trimannoside recognition by concanavalin A. J Biol Chem 271: 972–976, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Nakayama Y, Naruse M, Karakashian A, Peng T, Sands JM, Bagnasco SM. Cloning of the rat Slc14a2 gene and genomic organization of the UT-A urea transporter. Biochim Biophys Acta 1518: 19–26, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Nielsen S, Terris J, Smith CP, Hediger MA, Ecelbarger CA, Knepper MA. Cellular and subcellular localization of the vasopressin-regulated urea transporter in rat kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 5495–5500, 1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Peters BP, Ebisu S, Goldstein IJ, Flashner M. Interaction of wheat germ agglutinin with sialic acid. Biochemistry 18: 5505–5511, 1979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sands JM. Critical role of urea in the urine-concentrating mechanism. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 670–671, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sands JM, Flores FX, Kato A, Baum MA, Brown EM, Ward DT, Hebert SC, Harris HW. Vasopressin-elicited water and urea permeabilities are altered in IMCD in hypercalcemic rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 274: F978–F985, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Scheiffele P, Peränen J, Simons K. N-glycans as apical sorting signals in epithelial cells. Nature 378: 96–98, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Shayakul C, Tsukaguchi H, Berger UV, Hediger MA. Molecular characterization of a novel urea transporter from kidney inner medullary collecting ducts. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F487–F494, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Shibuya N, Goldstein IJ, Broekaert WF, Nsimba-Lubaki M, Peeters B, Peumans WJ. The elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) bark lectin recognizes the Neu5Ac (alpha 2–6)Gal/GalNAc sequence. J Biol Chem 262: 1596–1601, 1987 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Stewart GS, Fenton RA, Wang W, Kwon TH, White SJ, Collins VM, Cooper GJ, Nielsen S, Smith CP. The basolateral expression of mUT-A3 in the mouse kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286: F979–F987, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Stewart GS, King SL, Potter EA, Smith CP. Acute regulation of mUT-A3 urea transporter expressed in a MDCK cell line. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292: F1157–F1163, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Stewart GS, Thistlethwaite A, Lees H, Cooper GJ, Smith CP. Vasopressin regulation of the renal UT-A3 urea transporter. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F642–F648, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Terris JM, Ecelbarger CA, Sands JM, Knepper MA. Long-term regulation of renal urea transporter protein expression in rat. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 729–736, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Terris JM, Knepper MA, Wade JB. UT-A3: localization and characterization of an additional urea transporter isoform in the IMCD. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F325–F332, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Uchida S, Sohara E, Rai T, Ikawa M, Okabe M, Sasaki S. Impaired urea accumulation in the inner medulla of mice lacking the urea transporter UT-A2. Mol Cell Biol 25: 7357–7363, 2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Vagin O, Kraut JA, Sachs G. Role of N-glycosylation in trafficking of apical membrane proteins in epithelia. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F459–F469, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Vladimir P, Klein JD, Kozlowski SD, Wall SM, Sands JM. Vasopressin increases urea permeability in the initial IMCD from diabetic rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 289: F531–F535, 2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Yazawa S, Furukawa K, Kochibe N. Isolation of fucosyl glycoproteins from human erythrocyte membranes by affinity chromatography using Aleuria aurantia lectin. J Biochem 96: 1737–1742, 1984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. You G, Smith CP, Kanai Y, Lee WS, Stelzner M, Hediger MA. Cloning and characterization of the vasopressin-regulated urea transporter. Nature 365: 844–847, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Zhang C, Sands JM, Klein JD. Vasopressin rapidly increases phosphorylation of UT-A1 urea transporter in rat IMCDs through PKA. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 282: F85–F90, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES