Skip to main content
Journal of Neurophysiology logoLink to Journal of Neurophysiology
. 2012 Apr 11;108(2):406–418. doi: 10.1152/jn.00642.2011

Intrinsic voltage dynamics govern the diversity of spontaneous firing profiles in basal forebrain noncholinergic neurons

Saak V Ovsepian 1,2,, J Oliver Dolly 2, Laszlo Zaborszky 1
PMCID: PMC3404798  PMID: 22496531

Abstract

Spontaneous firing and behavior-related changes in discharge profiles of basal forebrain (BF) neurons are well documented, albeit the mechanisms underlying the variety of activity modes and intermodal transitions remain elusive. With the use of cell-attached recordings, this study identifies a range of spiking patterns in diagonal band Broca (DBB) noncholinergic cells of rats and tentatively categorizes them into low-rate random, tonic, and cluster firing activities. It demonstrates further that the multiplicity of discharge profiles is sustained intrinsically and persists after blockade of glutamate-, glycine/GABA-, and cholinergic synaptic inputs. Stimulation of muscarinic receptors, blockade of voltage-gated Ca2+-, and small conductance (SK) Ca2+-activated K+ currents as well as chelating of intracellular Ca2+ concentration accelerate low-rate random and tonic firing and favor transition of neurons into cluster firing mode. A similar trend towards higher discharge rates with switch of neurons into cluster firing has been revealed by activation of neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors with the NPY or NPY1 receptor agonist [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY. Whole cell current-clamp analysis demonstrates that the variety of spiking modes and intermodal transitions could be induced within the same neuronal population by injection of bias depolarizing or hyperpolarizing currents. Taken together, these data demonstrate the intrinsic and highly variable character of regenerative firing in BF noncholinergic cells, subject to powerful modulation by classical neurotransmitters, NPY, and small membrane currents.

Keywords: neuropeptide Y, modulation, pacemaker, spontaneous activity


the functional state of neuronal assemblies is critical for processing synaptic inputs in sensory, motor, and associative cortices (Gray 1994; Fries et al. 2001; Uhlhaas and Singer 2010). Defined by intrinsic biophysical properties and extrinsic synaptic drives, the activity of neurons in these cortical areas and their output are constantly adjusted by ascending modulator inputs from subcortical nuclei (Zaborszky et al. 1999; Semba 2000; Jones 2003). The basal forebrain (BF) is one of the key modulator systems of the brain with its topographically organized and all-embracing projections innervating the entire cerebral mantle (Jones 2004; Mesulam 2004). Through distributed innervations, it disseminates homeostatic and instructive signals from the reticular core of the forebrain, midbrain, and several brain stem structures to the higher levels. Until recently, most of the modulator functions of the BF have been attributed to its cholinergic component (Everitt and Robbins 1997; Jones 2004) despite the fact that cholinergic cells constitute only a third of the total population of BF neurons (Gritti et al. 1997; Zaborszky et al. 1999). More recently, however, the direct influence of basalo-cortical GABA- and glutamatergic drives on the activity and functions of neurons in both allo- and isocortices has been documented (McLin et al. 2002; Hur and Zaborszky 2005; Costa et al. 2006; Lin et al. 2006; Ovsepian 2006; Lin and Nicolelis 2008; Hur et al. 2009; Huh et al. 2010). These findings together with morphological evidence for monosynaptic BF GABAergic inputs in hippocampal and neocortical neurons (Freund and Gulyas 1991; Freund and Meskenaite 1992) strongly implicate the importance of the noncholinergic ascending synaptic drive in adjusting the neuronal activity and synaptic plasticity in these structures (McLin et al. 2002; Lin et al. 2006; Ovsepian 2006).

Simultaneous recording of BF single unit firing and cortical field potentials in vivo revealed a considerable heterogeneity in discharge profiles of BF neurons, which correlated significantly with population dynamics of cortical networks (Aston-Jones et al. 1984; Buzsaki et al. 1988; Zaborszky and Duque 2003; Lee et al. 2004). Based on the field potential recordings from various cortical areas, behavioral state, and firing patterns, several categories of BF cells have been defined (Szymusiak and McGinty 1986; Detari 2000; Zaborszky and Duque 2003). Intriguingly, these and numerous other studies also suggested considerable topographical overlap between neurons exhibiting various discharge profiles (Detari et al. 1987; Alam et al. 1997; Duque et al. 2000; Lee et al. 2004; Lin et al. 2006). These findings along with state-dependent transitions of tonic regular firing units into irregular spiking (Buzsaki et al. 1988; Manns et al. 2000; Lee et al. 2004) along with intermodal switches between various profiles in the same cells in anesthetized and behaving rats (Duque et al. 2000; Lin et al. 2006; Lin and Nicolelis 2008) suggest considerable flexibility of the regenerative activity in BF neurons. It remains unknown, however, to what extent the diversity of spiking profiles can be attributed to intrinsic electrogenic mechanisms and how influential are synaptic inputs in shaping the output of these neurons.

The present study analyses the spontaneous firing of noncholinergic cells in the diagonal band Broca (DBB) in acute brain slices. It shows that the variety of outputs in these (putative GABA- or possibly also glutamatergic) neurons is generated intrinsically, subject to modulation by synaptic inputs, intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]), apamin-sensitive Ca2+ activated K+ currents (IKCa), and neuropeptide Y (NPY). It also demonstrates that various discharge patterns with intermodal transitions can be induced within the same neuronal population through biasing their membrane potential with small depolarizing or hyperpolarizing currents.

METHODS

Prelabeling of DBB cholinergic neurons with Cy3-IgG192.

Experiments were performed in accordance with the U.S. Public Health Service Policy on Human Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the National Institute of Health and approved by the Rutgers University Institutional Board. Under deep anesthesia (ketamine: 90 mg/kg; xylasine: 10 mg/kg ip), Cy3-192IgG (2–4 μl; 0.4 mg/ml; 0.5 μl/min) was stereotaxically injected into the lateral ventricles of juvenile Sprague-Dawley rats (postnatal 12–14 days old) with a Hamilton syringe (22-gauge needle). Because BF cholinergic cells are the only forebrain neurons expressing low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor p75, Cy3-192IgG (Cy3-labeled monoclonal antibody against p75 receptor 192IgG) gets internalized and labels selectively cholinergic BF neurons. The injection coordinates used were as follows: 0.8 mm posterior from bregma, 1.2 mm lateral from midline, and 3–4 mm below the dura mater. Two to four days later Cy3-192IgG-injected animals were killed and used for electrophysiological recordings.

Slice preparation with identification and recordings from noncholinergic DBB cells.

Under deep anesthesia (with ketamine: 120 mg/kg; xylasine: 10 mg/kg), the Cy3-192IgG-preinjected animal was decapitated and the brain was removed and placed in low Na+, low Ca2+, high Mg2+ containing ice-cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid (slicing aCSF) of the following composition (in mM): 75 sucrose, 85 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 0.5 CaCl2, 4 MgCl2, and 25 glucose, with pH 7.4, continuously bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2. With the Vibrotome Series 1000 (St. Louis, MO), forebrain segment containing DBB was sliced (300 μ, coronal plane) and tissue was transferred for a 30-min incubation at 32°C (95% O2-5% CO2 bubbling) in the solution of the same composition, except that sucrose was omitted and the concentration of Na+ was increased to 125 mM. Subsequently, slices were transferred to recording aCSF containing the following (in mM): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, and 25 glucose, where it was kept aerated until used. Recordings were made in the environmental chamber fixed to the stage of an Olympus upright microscope (BX51) under continuous perfusion at a rate of 1–2 ml/min. DBB neurons were visualized using differential interference contrast and fluorescence optics. Cy3 was excited through a 540-nm band-pass filter; images (12 bit) were obtained with ×40 water dipping objective at 512- to 535-pixel resolution with a CCD camera (Quantix 57; Roper Scientific) mounted on the microscope; cells negative to Cy3-IgG192 were taken as noncholinergic neurons (Hartig et al. 1998; Wu et al. 2000).

Patch pipettes with an in-bath resistance of 3–6 MΩ were pulled from borosilicate glass capillary tubing (P97 puller; Sutter Instruments). For cell-attached recordings, electrodes were filled with filtered extracellular solution. For whole cell experiments, an internal solution of following composition was used (in mM): 140 KCH3O3S, 5 KCl, 5 NaCl, 2 MgATP, 0.01 EGTA, 10 HEPES, and 0.3 Tris-GTP pH 7.2. All recordings were obtained in current-clamp mode (Multiclamp 700B; Molecular Devices) in the aCSF maintained at temperatures close to physiological (34.5–36.5°C). Cell-attached recording configuration was established by positioning the recording pipette in close proximity to the neuronal soma followed by application of slight negative pressure to facilitate the loose seal formation (<50 MΩ) (Ovsepian and Friel 2010). In whole cell experiments, the electrode capacitance and series resistance were compensated under voltage-clamp using build-in protocols, followed by switch of the amplifier into the current-clamp mode. Membrane voltage was not corrected for liquid junction potentials. Only cells that showed spontaneous firing with stable spike overshoots exceeding +10 mV during the whole recording session were included in current analysis. The effects of drugs and chemicals were assessed via bath application at specified concentrations. Amplifier circuitry was used for injection of constant positive or negative currents through the patch electrode. The output signals of both cell-attached and whole cell experiments were filtered at 10 kHz and saved for offline analysis. Evoked responses were induced by direct stimulation of neurons with rectangular depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current pulses (30-pA increments; 1s) from hyperpolarized holding potentials, which was maintained closed to −65 mV by steady current passed through the patch pipette. For measurements of the action potential voltage peak and after-hyperpolarizing potentials (AHPs), a reference voltage was defined during the upstroke where dV/dt exceeds 5 V/s (see Fig. 2, A2 and B2). This voltage was also taken as a voltage threshold for generation of action potentials in response to depolarizing current injection (Ovsepian and Friel 2008) (IgorPro, 6.01; Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR). Action potential width was evaluated as the width of the spike waveform at half-amplitude, measured from the same reference voltage. Stretches of spike trains of ≥5-min duration were used for assessments of spontaneous firing parameters with threshold crossing macro (Clampfit 10.0; Molecular Devices). Action potential discharge rate and regularity [interspike interval variation coefficient (ISI CV)] were measured for each individual cell before and after treatment. Firing was defined as tonic if two or more action potentials (range 2–31) were generated per second with maximum ISI variability (ISI standard deviation) not exceeding 50% of the mean ISI. Cluster firing was defined empirically as spike sequences (>3 action potentials; typically 5–9) with individual action potentials interspaced by periods of quiescence, which exceeded at least three times the mean ISIs within the spike packs (clusters). Profiles not meeting these criteria were considered as low-rate random firing.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Electrophysiological properties of Cy3-IgG192-positive and -negative neurons in DBB area: current-clamp recordings of membrane responses produced by pulse stimuli. A and B, top to bottom: traces represent recordings of membrane voltage responses to current-pulse stimuli (protocols indicated below). Note a characteristic shoulder with delayed firing of cholinergic cell in response to depolarizing stimuli (A, top, arrow) and activation of inward rectifier current by strong negative current pulse stimulus (A, bottom). B: lower current intensity threshold for spike generation with rebound discharge and depolarizing sag, activated by hyperpolarizing current stimuli are well-known characteristics of basal forebrain noncholinergic cells. A2 and B2: representative first action potential evoked by depolarizing pulse stimulus (top) with its first order derivative (dV/dt) at bottom. Note faster action potential waveform with shallower after-hyperpolarizing potential (AHP) of noncholinergic neuron (B2) compared with the cholinergic (Cy3-IgG192)-positive neuron. Vm, membrane voltage.

Double labeling of DBB cholinergic neurons and fluorescence microscopy.

Experimental procedures conformed to the guidelines approved by the Dublin City University Ethics Committee under the license of the Department of Children and Health, Ireland. The surgical procedure (n = 3) and lateral ventricular injections of Cy3-IgG192 (n = 2) or saline (n = 1) were performed as described above; animals were allowed to recover for 2 days. On the third day, they were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (Euthatal, Pfizer; 200 mg/kg ip) and perfused transcardially with 150 ml 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4, followed by a 100 ml 4% paraformaldehyde, pH 7.4. The brains were removed from the skulls and postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, pH 7.4, at 4°C overnight, cryoprotected with 30% sucrose solution in 0.1 M PBS, and sectioned (coronal, 35-μm thick) on freezing microtome (Leica, CM3050 S). The free-floating sections from genu of corpus callosum to the crossing of anterior commissure were collected in PBS, washed three times, and incubated in 0.4% Triton X-100 for an hour in the dark box at room temperature. After three thorough washes, the tissue was incubated in blocking solution containing 5% BSA and 2% rabbit serum for 1 h followed by incubation in anti-choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) polyclonal antibody (Millipore; AB144P) in 1:100 dilutions in the same blocking solution with 0.4% Triton X-100 in 0.1 PBS, overnight in the dark box (room temperature). Following five rounds of wash with 0.1 PBS (5 min each), sections were incubated in secondary rabbit anti-goat polyclonal antibody (1:1000 dilutions) labeled with FITC for 2 h. This was followed by thorough rinsing of the tissue in 0.1 PBS and mounting on charged glass slides. After being air-dried, slices were covered with Vectashield hardest medium. The internal control for the staining was carried out with omission of primary antibody. Field micrographs were obtained (×40 objective) using laser scanning microscope in epifluorescence mode (pinhole wide open; AxioObserver, Carl Zeiss). Argon and helium/neon lasers provided the 488 and 568 nm lines for excitation. The emitted signals were sampled in a frame mode at spatial resolution of 30-nm per pixel with 1.5-μs dwell time. ChAT- and Cy3-positive neurons of the DBB nucleus, which in rat anatomically extends between septum and caudal extension of the horizontal limb of the DBB bordering with magnicellular preoptic area (Zaborszky et al. 1999), were sampled for current analysis. Neuronal cell bodies were counted within defined subregions of the DBB nucleus and tabulated for analysis. Colocalization of Cy3 and FITC is estimated based on the presence of two labels within the same pixel of digitally acquired images, using colocalization macro (Zen 2008).

Data analysis and statistical significance.

Data are reported as means ± SE with statistical significance estimated using paired or unpaired Student's t-test. In experiments involving multiple-repeated comparisons, one-way ANOVA was applied for significance assessment. The difference between samples was defined as significant if P value was <0.05.

Drugs and chemicals.

All chemicals and drugs were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) except Cy3-IgG192, which was purchased from Advanced Targeting Systems, and NPY, NPY1, and NPY5 receptor agonists [Leu31,Pro34] NPY and [d-TRP34]-NPY, which were obtained from Tocris (Tocris Biosciences). Secondary rabbit anti-goat polyclonal antibody labeled with FITC was purchase from Abcam.

RESULTS

Intraventricular injection of Cy3-IgG192 labels exclusively DBB cholinergic neurons.

Numerous Cy3-labeled neurons were visible in medial septum, in DBB, in ventral pallidum, and in more caudal BF nuclei in fixed brain slices of Cy3-IgG192 injected animals. At higher magnification, distinctly punctuate intracellular presence of Cy3 was evident, consistent with its uptake and concentration in endosomal compartments (Hartig et al. 1998; Kacza et al. 2000). Immunostaining of MS and DBB containing slices for ChAT revealed vast majority of DBB ChAT-positive profiles being also labeled with Cy3-IgG192 (97.4 ± 1.9%; Fig. 1, A–C). Similarly, almost all Cy3-IgG192-positive profiles in the DBB were also labeled positive for ChAT (98.7 ± 1.1%; Fig. 1C). These data are consistent with an high specificity of Cy3-IgG192 as a marker for labeling cholinergic neurons in DBB nuclei and agree with earlier studies, showing ∼100% in situ colabeling of ChAT-positive cells with Cy3-IgG192 in rostral BF nuclei (Hartig et al. 1998). Congruently, whole cell recordings from DBB Cy3-IgG192-positive and -negative neurons in 300-μm slices (n = 6 and n = 11, respectively) revealed characteristics electrophysiological profiles (Fig. 2, A and B, and Fig. 3, A–C) with hyperpolarization-activated inward rectifier current seen in all but only Cy3-IgG192-positive neurons (6/6, 100%; Fig. 2A). In contrast, the majority of Cy3-unlabeled (8/11, ∼72%) cells responded to hyperpolarizing stimuli by delayed depolarizing sag potential, attributed to slow activating Ih current (Fig. 2B), with the rest exhibiting relatively linear I/V relation within negative potential ranges. Differences were also revealed in responses of these cells to suprathreshold depolarizing stimuli, with all Cy3-IgG192-positive cells exhibiting a characteristic shoulder (outward rectification) before the onset of action potentials firing from more depolarized voltages (voltage threshold: −32.4 ± 2.1 mV vs. −37.3 ± 1.8 mV; P = 0.021) with action potentials being slower (half width: 0.54 ± 0.03 ms vs. 0.31 ± 0.02 ms; P < 0.001) and followed by more prominent AHPs (19.5 ± 3.1 mV vs. 4.2 ± 1.2; P < 0.001; Fig. 2, A and B). These observations verify the adequacy of Cy3-IgG192 in vivo prelabeling as a reliable method for identification of noncholinergic neurons in the DBB. It should be emphasized, however, that Cy3-IgG192 cannot be applied with the same certainty for differentiating cholinergic from noncholinergic cells in more caudal nuclei of the BF, due to the fact that ChAT-positive profiles therein do not always express p75 nerve growth factor receptor (Ferreira et al. 2001; Nickerson Poulin et al. 2006).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Immunostaining of slices for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) confirms exclusive specificity of Cy3-IgG192 for cholinergic population of diagonal band Broca (DBB) neurons. A and B: in vivo Cy3-IgG192-prelabeled cholinergic DBB neurons stained for ChAT. A, left: Cy3-IgG192 labeling; middle: same section stained for ChAT; right: left and middle frames overlaid (merged). Arrows on the left and middle frames point onto ChAT negative vascular elements adjoined to the pia but labeled with Cy3-IgG192. VDB and HDB, vertical and horizontal limbs of diagonal band Broca, respectively; VP, ventral pallidum. B: framed area (white square) from A, right, enlarged. Note a high degree of colabeling of cholinergic neurons with Cy3-IgG192. Arrows indicate some of ChAT-positive somas within the HDB area labeled also with Cy3. C: summary plots indicating the percentage of colabeling of ChAT-positive cells with Cy3-IgG192 (left) and vice versa (right). Total population of counted cells (n = 297) is taken as 100% (white bars); fraction of double-labeled neurons is expressed as black bars (%).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Cell-attached recording from DBB noncholinergic neurons in brain slices. A–C: Fluorescence live micrographs (300-μm slice) of HDB of DBB illustrating Cy-IgG192-labeled cholinergic cells (A) with closer view of cholinergic (B1 and B2) and noncholinergic (C1 and C2) neurons: fluorescence (B1 and C1) and differential interference contrast (DIC; B2 and C2) micrographs. C1 and C2: arrowheads point to the soma of the same neuron. D: examples of random (top), tonic (middle), and cluster (bottom) firing profiles with corresponding (E) instantaneous frequency plots. F: interspike interval (ISI) distribution histograms of 3 different profiles. G and H: summary plots of average firing rates (G) and ISI variation coefficient (H) of random, tonic, and cluster firing activities. *Significance of the differences (one-way ANOVA test).

Spontaneous firing activity of DBB noncholinergic neurons in acute slices.

Cell-attached recordings were used to examine the spontaneous firing activity of medium and large size Cy3-IgG192-negative neurons within vertical and horizontal limbs of DBB (Fig. 3, A–C). The vast majority of tested cells (108 from 116, 93.1%) showed continuous firing during entire recording session. Consistent with single unit in vivo data (see discussion), noncholinergic BF neurons in slice revealed a variety of discharge profiles, which were tentatively classified in three categories. The bulk (74/108; 68.5%) exhibited tonic firing (discharge range: 2–31 Hz; means ± SE: 9.18 ± 1.2 Hz), while the rest generated action potentials randomly (12/108; 11.1%) at relatively lower rates (discharge range: 0.1–5.2 Hz; means ± SE: 3.1 ± 0.7 Hz) or fired spikes in clusters (22/108; 20.3%; range: 15–45 Hz; means ± SE: 20.2 ± 2.4; Fig. 3, D–G). Comparison of the discharge rates revealed significant differences between three profiles (P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA). The heterogeneity of firing patterns was reflected also in ISI distribution histograms, with a relatively regular firing tonic profiles yielding Gaussian shaped ISI distribution histograms, contrasting to skewed ISI distribution of random or cluster firing cells (Fig. 3, E–H). Accordingly, the ISI CV was the lowest in tonic (means ± SE: CV = 0.22 ± 0.1) followed by random (means ± SE: CV = 0.58 ± 0.13) and being the highest in clusters firing profiles (means ± SE: CV = 0.86 ± 0.14; P = 0.00032, one-way ANOVA; Fig. 3H). Thus, in the absence of long-range synaptic inputs in acute brain slices, DBB neurons discharge spontaneously, similar to single units of BF shown in vivo (Zaborszky and Duque 2003).

GABAergic synaptic inputs modulate the output of DBB noncholinergic neurons.

To establish if main synaptic inputs contribute to ongoing firing of DBB neurons, the effects of glutamate, GABA/glycine, and acetylcholine receptor blockers on spiking of these cells were examined. Application of broad spectrum glutamate and GABAA/glycine receptor blockers (5 mM kynurinate and 200 μM picrotoxin, respectively) (Altmann et al. 1976; Stone 1993) caused notable discharge acceleration in tonic firing profiles (n = 9; rate increase: 32.5 ± 6.2%, P = 0.00052) with reduction in ISI CV (P < 0.0001; Fig. 4, A1 and A2). These changes were visible in ISI distribution histograms, which become narrower and shifted towards lower ISIs (Fig. 4A2). Similar treatment induced discharge acceleration and ISI CV reduction in random and cluster firing neurons, albeit these changes reached statistical significance only in the first group (n = 4, rate increase: 41.2 ± 12.1%, P = 0.032; n = 5, rate increase: 17.3 ± 9.1%, P = 0.25; not shown). Next, relative contribution of inhibitory inputs to modulation of spontaneous firing was assessed, given that neurons in rostral BF receive intense GABA/glycinergic synaptic inputs (Segal 1986; Bengtson and Osborne 2000). Markedly, picrotoxin, a potent blocker of GABA/glycine-activated Cl channels fully replicated the acceleration of spontaneous firing with ISI CV reduction produced by its coapplication with kynurinate (n = 5; firing rate increase: 38.5 ± 5.2%, P = 0.00039; 3.2-fold reduction in ISI CV, P < 0.0001; Fig. 4, B1 and B2). Similar experiments with only kynurinate revealed no alterations in the rate and regularity of spontaneous firing (rate: P = 0.48; CV: P = 0.51; n = 4). These data are consistent with substantial inhibitory but not excitatory synaptic activity in DBB noncholinergic cells in acute brain slices. As noncholinergic cells receive profuse innervations from local cholinergic neurons (Zaborszky et al. 1986, 1999; Brauer et al. 1998), next the effects of blockade of muscarinic-receptor mediated endogenous cholinergic drive with atropine (n = 9) and activation of muscarinic cholinergic receptors with muscarine (n = 10) were assessed in the presence of kynurinate and picrotoxin. No changes in discharge rate or regularity of tonic (n = 5, P = 0.78) and cluster firing (n = 4, P = 0.31) cells were revealed upon application of atropine (10 μM) (Morton and Davies 1997). In contrast, both tonic (discharge rate increase: 32.4 ± 5.1%; n = 7, P = 0.029) and cluster firing (discharge rate increase: 24.4 ± 4.6%, n = 3, P = 0.008) were accelerated after exposure of slices to muscarine (20 μM) (Peinado 2000). Acceleration of firing produced by muscarine was accompanied with enhancement of ISI CV (2.5-fold, n = 7) and emergence of spike cluster episodes (Fig. 4, C1 and C2). Overall, these findings suggest considerable modulation of the firing activity of DBB noncholinergic cell by spontaneous GABAA/glycinergic but not glutamate- or cholinergic synaptic inputs.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Inhibitory synaptic drive modulates the output of DBB noncholinergic cells. A1: instantaneous firing rate graph with corresponding raster plots of tonic firing cell before (red: top and bottom) and after (black: top and bottom) blockade of excitatory [with kynurinate (Kyn)] and inhibitory [with picrotoxin (Picro)] synaptic inputs. A2: ISI histograms of the same cell before and after application of the blockers (red and black, respectively). Note that pharmacological treatment eliminates prolonged ISIs (A1) and curtails the shoulder of the ISI histogram. Here and in subsequent figures: Avg. and CV, average discharge rate and coefficient of ISI variation, respectively. B1 and B2: picrotoxin alone mimics the effects kynurinate and picrotoxin on tonic firing profile. Reduction of ISI variability caused by picrotoxin (B1) is reflected in tightened and left-shifted ISI histogram (B2). C1: muscarine (after the blockade of glutamate and GABA receptors) renders regular tonic firing profile erratic and causes the emergence of spike clusters (C1 and C2), an effect reflected in notable broadening of the ISI histogram (C2).

Voltage-gated ICa+ and apamin-sensitive IK+ stabilize the intrinsic firing activity of noncholinergic DBB neurons.

Next, the role of voltage-activated Ca2+ (ICa2+) and IKCa in regulating the spontaneous firing of noncholinergic DBB cells was examined after pharmacological blockade of ionotropic glutamatergic and GABA/glycinergic synaptic inputs. Inhibition of high- and low-voltage activated ICa2+ by cobalt (CoCl2, 100 μM) caused a rapid discharge rate increase and switched tonic firing cells into cluster firing mode (10 min after treatment: firing rate increase: 134.6 ± 11.6%; CV increase: 4.3-fold; P < 0.0001; n = 9; Fig. 5, A1 and A2). In seven neurons, high rate irregular firing induced by cobalt persisted during the entire (15 min) recording session, while in two cells, discharge acceleration was followed by cessation of firing (not shown). The effects of cobalt were mimicked by another inorganic voltage-activated ICa2+ blocker cadmium (CdCl2, 200 μM; n = 5, 10 min after treatment: firing rate increase: 126.7 ± 16.2%; CV increase: 3.6-fold; P < 0.0001), as well as by a selective small-conductance IKCa (SK) channel inhibitor apamin (50 nM; n = 6; 10 min after treatment: firing rate increase: 89%; CV increase: 3.2-fold; P < 0.0001; Fig. 5B), suggesting a stabilizing role of high-voltage activated ICa2+ and SK IKCa on firing activity of BF noncholinergic neurons. The stabilizing role of Ca2+ on intrinsic pacemaking was further confirmed by whole cell current clamp recordings through dialysis of neurons with a rapid Ca2+ chelator BAPTA (20 mM). Introduction of BAPTA via patch pipette rapidly accelerated the spontaneous spiking of noncholinergic neurons (n = 7; firing rate increase: 180.6 ± 19.4% at 25–35 s after breaking the membrane; P < 0.0001) and switched tonic firing cells into high-frequency cluster firing activity mode (Fig. 5, C–E). Similar to some of cobalt-treated cells, acceleration of firing caused by BAPTA was followed by cessation of spiking, with membrane potential settling at depolarized voltages (−42.5 ± 2.1 mV, n = 7). Intriguingly, in five cells silenced by BAPTA, firing could be restored by injection of hyperpolarizing current (Fig. 5E). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that both the rate and pattern of spontaneous firing in DBB noncholinergic neurons are under control of inhibitory synaptic inputs, voltage-activated ICa2+, SK IKCa, and intracellular [Ca2+] (Fig. 5F).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Voltage-activated Ca2+ influx and intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]) stabilize the firing activity of noncholinergic cells. A1: effect of cobalt on tonic firing (thick black bar over the graph) with representative raster plots (top). A2: ISI histograms of spontaneous firing activity of the same neuron before and after treatment; note that cobalt dramatically accelerates the ongoing firing and renders it irregular, causing leftward shift of the ISI distribution histogram peak with rightward extension of its shoulder. B1 and B2: effect of apamin (black horizontal bar) on tonic spiking cell. B1: instantaneous firing rate graph with raster plots, bottom and top, respectively. B2: ISI histograms of the same neuron before and after its treatment with apamin. C–E: whole cell recordings with dialysis of tonic-firing cell with BAPTA causes membrane depolarization and firing acceleration with transition into cluster firing (D) followed by cessation of firing (E). Note, that injection of negative current restores the firing silenced by BAPTA. F: summary plot of average discharge rates and ISI CV of DBB noncholinergic cells: 1) low-rate random spiking (n = 12, ○); 2 and 3) tonic spiking before and after treatment with kynurinate and picrotoxin (n = 9, ● and □); 4) control cluster firing (n = 22, ■); and 5, 6, and 7) cluster firing induced in kynurinate and picrotoxin-treated cells by their further exposure to cobalt chloride (n = 9, ♢), cadmium chloride (n = 5, ♦), and apamine (n = 6, ▼). Note that both the discharge rates and the ISI CVs of authentically cluster firing neurons and cluster firing produced by pharmacological treatments closely overlap.

NPY and [Leu31,Pro34] NPY accelerate spontaneous firing of noncholinergic cells.

The presence of NPY-positive neurons in the BF and modulation of cortical activity by this peptide when injected into the BF (Zaborszky and Duque 2003; Duque et al. 2007; Toth et al. 2007) encouraged us to investigate its potential role in governing the discharge characteristics of BF cholinergic (Zaborszky et al. 2009) and noncholinergic cells. Of the 6 NPY receptor subtypes (NPY1–6), NPY1 and NPY5 are shown to be residing at postsynaptic elements, where they are negatively coupled to voltage-gated Ca2+ currents (Gehlert 1994; McQuiston et al. 1996; Lin et al. 2003). In the presence of kynurinate and picrotoxin, application of NPY (0.5 μM) caused gradual discharge acceleration in noncholinergic neurons (in 8 of 9 tested cells, firing rate increase: 67.7%; P = 0.0016), an effect accompanied with an increase in ISI CV (P = 0.0003) and emergence of spike clusters (Fig. 6A). In a similar way, the effects of NPY1-receptor-selective agonist [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY (0.5 μM) (Klapstein and Colmers 1997) and NPY5-receptor-selective agonist [d-TRP34]-NPY, NPY5 (0.5 μM) (Pronchuk et al. 2002) were tested (Fig. 6, B and C). Like NPY, application of [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY caused firing acceleration (in 7 of 8 tested cells, firing rate increase: 67.7%; P = 0.0019) with transition of neurons into cluster spiking mode. These changes were associated with enhancement of ISI CV (P = 0.00012), reflected in leftward shift of skewed ISI distribution histogram (Fig. 6B). Alterations of spiking caused by NPY and [Leu31,Pro34] contrasted to the lack of visible effects on spontaneous firing rate and regularity in slices exposed to NPY5-receptor agonist [d-TRP34]-NPY (n = 8; rate change: P = 0.54; ISI CV change: P = 0.32, respectively; Fig. 6C). To establish membrane potential changes associated with NPY-induced acceleration of spiking, the effects of this peptide were examined using whole cell current clamp recordings. From four spontaneously firing Cy3-IgG192-negative cells tested, in three NPY (0.5 μM) caused increase in both discharge rate (72.3 ± 11%; P = 0.0021) and ISI CV (3.4 ± 0.3-fold) associated with a shift of the interspike voltage towards more depolarized potentials and reduction of AHPs (Fig. 7, A and B). These effects reversed only partially after a 15- to 20-min washout (34.1 ± 9%; 2.2 ± 0.2-fold) of the peptide. Overall, these findings suggest that the majority of noncholinergic DBB cells are responsive to NPY, which via stimulation of NPY1 receptors, accelerates and switches their spiking into cluster firing mode.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and NPY1 receptor agonist [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY accelerate and renders DBB noncholinergic cells irregular. A1: instantaneous firing rate graphs and raster plots of tonic firing profile before and after its exposure to NPY (in the presence of kynurinate and picrotoxin). A2: ISI distribution histograms before and after treatment; note the leftward shift of ISI peak and rightward extension of histogram's shoulder. B1 and B2: similar changes in spontaneous firing were also produced by NPY1 receptor agonist [Leu31,Pro34]-NPY. High-frequency discharge stimulated by NPY induces clustered spike episodes interrupted with gaps of lacking spikes (raster). C1 and C2: unlike, application of NPY5 receptor agonist, [d-TRP34]-NPY did not cause notable change in the instantaneous firing rate or regularity of noncholinergic neuron.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Acceleration of noncholinergic cell firing produced by NPY is due to its depolarizing effects and reduction of AHPs. A: example of continuous recording of spontaneous firing activity in whole cell current-clamp mode before and during application of 0.5 μM NPY. Broken line at bottom indicates the level of the membrane potential corresponding to −60 mV. Note gradual shift of the minimal membrane potential after exposure of neuron to NPY. Top: grey, control; black, NPY application. B: spike trains from marked segment (arrow) expanded. It is evident that NPY strongly increases the discharge rate and renders the regular firing neuron into irregular (cluster) firing profile. Similar observations were made in 4 noncholinergic cells examined.

Distinct discharge modes of noncholinergic DBB neurons are interconvertible and can be mimicked by injection of bias currents.

A key question in BF research is if the variety of single unit discharge profiles documented in vivo reflects heterogeneity of neuron types rigidly tuned for defined firing patterns or it is an indicative of an array of dynamic states of the same cell population capable of supporting multiple outputs. Our findings show that DBB noncholinergic cells can switch among random, tonic regular, and cluster firing modes. Because intermodal transitions associate with changes in discharge rate and membrane potential, we proposed that the variety of patterns could be induced by biasing the membrane potential of these cells towards more depolarizing or hyperpolarizing voltages. To test this, effects of steady positive or negative currents on firing modes of DBB noncholinergic cells were examined under the blockade of both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs. Figure 8, A–C, illustrates examples of intermodal switch in noncholinergic neuron caused by bias current injection. As shown, tonic regular activity is switched to cluster firing mode by depolarization while constant hyperpolarizing current turns a cluster firing neuron into tonic (Fig. 8, A and B). With such manipulations, a low-rate random firing neurons could be switched into tonic, which in turn converted into cluster firing by injection additional depolarizing current or vice versa (Fig. 8, B and C, and Fig. 9). Similar experiments with low rate random (n = 5), tonic (n = 11), and cluster firing (n = 6) cells demonstrated that variety of functional states are highly dynamic and interconvertible regardless their initial firing profile. Notably, a strong depolarizing current could also mimic effects of BAPTA or cobalt, occasionally causing complete blockade of spiking with emergence of sub-threshold membrane potential oscillations (n = 11; Fig. 8D), a feature attributed to BF GABAergic neurons stimulated by prolonged depolarizing currents (Alonso et al. 1996). Taken together, these findings are consistent with dynamic nature of intrinsic pacemaker mechanisms of BF noncholinergic cells, which are likely to contribute to the variety of firing modes described by in vivo studies.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Intrinsic voltage dynamics govern the variety of firing profiles in noncholinergic DBB neurons. A: an example of depolarization-induced switch of tonic firing profile into cluster firing (left and middle, respectively) with its return into tonic firing mode after removal of the steady depolarizing current. Intensities of injected currents here and below are indicated above. B: example of cluster firing profile with transition into tonic regular firing mode caused by hyperpolarizing steady current injection. C: low-rate random firing neuron switched into regular tonic firing profile by steady depolarizing current followed by recovery of the initial firing mode after removal of depolarizing stimuli. D: block of firing activity with emergence of the subthreshold membrane oscillations revealed under strong depolarization.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Switch of spontaneous firing activity of DBB noncholinergic neuron between different discharge profiles by injected constant currents. A: random firing DBB noncholinergic cell switched into tonic followed by its further conversion into cluster firing mode by increasing depolarizing current. B: high-frequency cluster firing DBB noncholinergic neuron turned into tonic firing followed by its further switch into low-rate random firing by hyperpolarizing current. Intensities of injected currents are at top.

DISCUSSION

BF neurons integrate and relay a wide range of instructive and homeostatic modulator signals from the brain stem and midbrain reticular nuclei to the cortical mantle. Electrophysiological analysis in vivo revealed considerable state and behavior-related diversity of single unit firing activity in these neurons. Little is known, however, if a variety of discharge profiles signifies a medley of BF neuron types rigidly tuned to generate defined outputs or whether it is indicative of dynamic intrinsic mechanisms of a relatively homogenous neuronal population. This study demonstrates the considerable flexibility and interconvertibility of different firing profiles within the same population of DBB noncholinergic cells in acute brain slices, a subject of modulation by synaptic inhibition, cholinergic (muscarinic) drive, NPY, and intracellular [Ca2+] dynamics.

Modulation of firing activity of DBB noncholinergic cells by synaptic drives.

Electrophysiological data presented here indicate a range of self-sustained spiking profiles in BF noncholinergic cells in acute brain slices. It is conceivable that the biophysical mechanisms supporting a range of discharge modes shown here contribute to the multiplicity of outputs of these neurons discovered in the intact brain (Aston-Jones et al. 1984; Pang et al. 1998; Duque et al. 2000; Lee et al. 2004), given that both the firing rate and pattern of neurons in slices closely mimic those reported in vivo. Because strong tetrodotoxin-sensitive GABAergic synaptic inputs have been observed in several brain structures, including hippocampus (Alger and Nicoll 1980; Collingridge et al. 1984; Toth et al. 1997), cerebral cortex (Salin and Prince 1996), BF cholinergic neurons (Khateb et al. 1998), and cerebellum (Ovsepian and Friel 2010), described herein, spontaneously firing noncholinergic cells (108 from 116 cells examined with cell attached recordings exhibited intrinsic firing, 93.1%) could represent the GABAergic neuronal population of the BF. Such conjecture is consistent with a failure of kynurinate to induce notable changes in the firing activity of noncholinergic cells, implying a relatively quiescent state of DBB local glutamatergic cells. It also provides an important clue that might explain the somewhat lower discharge rates of tonic firing noncholinergic cells in slices, compared with those found in vivo (Pang et al. 1998; Duque et al. 2000; Hassani et al. 2010), where long-range excitatory inputs can activate BF noncholinergic neurons. Although it is tempting to speculate that disproportionate effects of picrotoxin on tonic, random, and cluster firing (discharge rate increase: ∼32, ∼41, and ∼17%, respectively) could reflect disproportionate levels of inhibitory drives in these cells, other mechanisms that might also contribute to regulating the efferent output of intrinsically active neurons should be considered (Jaeger et al. 1997; Gauck and Jaeger 2000). The hyperpolarization-activated cation Ih, voltage-gated [Ca2+], KCa currents (Griffith 1988; Alonso et al. 1996; Easaw et al. 1997; Bengtson and Osborne 2000; Sotty et al. 2003) and persistent Na+ current (Ovsepian SV and Zaborszky L, unpublished data) identified in BF noncholinergic cells are likely to be critical in driving intrinsic activity. The flexible nature with capability to produce a range of activity patterns influenced by neurotransmitters and modulators suggests that both endogenous firing mechanisms and prevailing synaptic inputs would contribute to the ascending noncholinergic drive with important implications for population activity of neurons in recipient cortical fields. Indeed, as demonstrated by us and others, blockade of GABA/glycinergic synaptic transmission or activation of cholinergic or NPY receptors strongly alter the main parameters of spike trains in BF noncholinergic cells.

Intrinsic voltage dynamics can dictate the multiplicity of discharge mode in DBB noncholinergic cells.

One of the key findings of this study is that chelation of intracellular [Ca2+] with BAPTA causes membrane depolarization with switch of tonic and low rate irregular firing profiles into cluster firing. A similar trend has also been observed after the blockade of voltage-activated Ca2+ channels, consistent with tight coupling between the endogenous spiking machinery and intracellular [Ca2+] signaling. Our data are consistent with BAPTA (20 mM) (Roussel et al. 2006) being more effective in destabilizing the intrinsic firing machinery of noncholinergic cells, leading to high-frequency cluster firing followed by complete silencing of all tested neurons, compared with inorganic [Ca2+] channel blockers such as cobalt and cadmium, which silenced only a fraction of noncholinergic neurons. A likely explanation for the discrepancy between the effects of BAPTA and [Ca2+] channel blockers could be the additional stabilizing influence of internal-store released [Ca2+] (Velumian and Carlen 1999; Roussel et al. 2006) on regenerative spiking of DBB noncholinergic cells. Indeed, internally applied BAPTA blocks effectively processes relying on cytosolic free [Ca2+] (Velumian and Carlen 1999) while blockers of Ca2+ channels would predominantly suppress functions activated by voltage-gated [Ca2+] influx. Comparable depolarizing effects of BAPTA with acceleration of regenerative spiking have been also reported in other central neurons (Williams et al. 2002; Roussel et al. 2006). Intriguingly, through such linkage of intracellular [Ca2+] with electrogenic machinery of noncholinergic cells, the internal [Ca2+] stores can play an important role in tuning the basalo-cortical drive, with direct influence on the dynamics of cortical networks. Because Ca2+ homeostasis in neurons is subject to developmental regulation (Murchison and Griffith 1999, 2007; Toescu and Verkhratsky 2000; Felmy and Schneggenburger 2004; Ovsepian and Friel 2008), noncholinergic ascending drive along with cholinergic inputs (Ovsepian et al. 2004; Hasselmo and Giocomo 2006; Ovsepian 2008) is likely to modulate the state of cortical networks and plasticity mechanisms, with implications for age-related neurodegenerative processes (Harman 2002, 2006; Wojda et al. 2008). In this context, it should be emphasized that several neurotransmitter-activated processes relating Ca2+ signaling and internal store-released [Ca2+] have been demonstrated in BF neurons (Alreja and Liu 1996; Fort et al. 1998; Wu et al. 2004; Xu et al. 2004). The highly dynamic character of intrinsic firing of these cells was also confirmed through demonstration of the influence of small bias currents on various spiking patterns and their interconvertibility in BF noncholinergic cells, an observation that suggests a continuum rather than multiple neuron types with rigidly defined activity profiles. The latter along with cross-modal flexibility should broaden considerably their tuning curves for a wide range of inputs with the advantage that at any given time broader discharge rates and patterns can be covered by these neurons. Receptive to inputs with more than one variable, greater intrinsic flexibility of noncholinergic cells will therefore also render the population output of these cells less sensitive to the loss of a small number of cells or increase in the level of noise (Lewis and Kristan 1998; Eurich and Wilke 2000; Sanger 2003), improving the reliability of signal transfer from the modulator brain stem and mid-brain nuclei through the BF to higher forebrain structures. Because the best use of population representation dictates that overall entropy (which is related to the variability of the spike patterns) in neuronal network is high (McCulloch 1965; Llinas 2001; Sanger 2003), different activity patterns of DBB noncholinergic cells should also improve the capacity of these cells to represent and process simultaneously a range of inputs. Interestingly, the higher proportion of tonic profiles revealed by our experiments suggests that tonic firing is the most preferred and electrochemically favorable activity state of noncholinergic cells. Given that the discharge modes of these neurons and their dynamic states can be influenced by synaptic inputs and modulator drives, their output at a given time should represent the integral of self-sustaining activity with synaptic drives and modulator inputs (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Hypothetical model depicting main activity profiles with factors driving transitions between various profiles in basal forebrain (BF) noncholinergic cells. Homeostasis and instructive ascending signals from reticular midbrain and brain stem nuclei stimulate one of three principal modes of activity in BF noncholinergic neurons, through neurotransmitter (GABAergic, glycinergic, and cholinergic) and NPY-activated mechanisms and intracellular [Ca2+] signaling. These various states of activity can also be induced by changes in net currents, driving membrane voltage towards depolarized or hyperpolarized potentials. Alterations of firing activity between different modes through direct basalo-cortical modulator pathway (top box) impacts directly the activity of cortical neurons.

Functional implications.

Although both cholinergic and noncholinergic components of the ascending basalo-cortical modulator system are well recognized, there is ongoing dispute over the origin of the diversity of various activity profiles in BF projection neurons (Zaborszky and Duque 2003). While some studies, based on discharge characteristics classify three subpopulations of BF neurons (Szymusiak and McGinty 1986), others defined at least five different neuron subtypes (Detari et al. 1987; Detari and Vanderwolf 1987) with neurochemical identity of single units exhibiting various profiles in vivo remaining a matter of controversy. Manns and co-workers, for instance, attributed burst firing activity to cholinergic projection neurons (Manns et al. 2000) while others suggested that bursts are not characteristic to cholinergic cells but can be generated by parvalbumin-positive neurons (Duque et al. 2000; Zaborszky and Duque 2003). Nonetheless, most reports demonstrate a range of firing profiles in BF, extending from low-rate random to high-frequency tonic or burst-cluster firing (Detari et al. 1987; Duque et al. 2000; Zaborszky and Duque 2003; Lin et al. 2006; Lin and Nicolelis 2008). The flexible character of noncholinergic cell outputs in slices revealed here suggests that the various firing patterns found in vivo could be manifestations of different discharge modes of relatively homogeneous cell populations capable of supporting multiple activity profiles. The broad range of activity patterns of noncholinergic neurons described here should enable the use of both rate and temporal codes by these cells for processing inputs and communicating highly dynamic outputs to recipient cortical fields.

GRANTS

This research was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant NS-023945 (to L. Zaborszky) and by a PRTLI4 grant from the Irish Higher Education Authority to the Neuroscience Research Stream of Target-Driven Therapeutics and Theranostics Programme (P.I.: O. J. Dolly).

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Author contributions: S.V.O. and L.Z. conception and design of research; S.V.O. performed experiments; S.V.O. analyzed data; S.V.O., O.J.D., and L.Z. interpreted results of experiments; S.V.O. prepared figures; S.V.O. and L.Z. drafted manuscript; S.V.O., O.J.D., and L.Z. edited and revised manuscript; S.V.O., O.J.D., and L.Z. approved final version of manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the help Inga Antyborzec with immunohistochemistry. We also thank Dr. Tibor Koos, Dr. Valerie O'Leary, and Cargi Unal for insightful comments on this manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. Alam MN, McGinty D, Szymusiak R. Thermosensitive neurons of the diagonal band in rats: relation to wakefulness, and non-rapid eye movement sleep. Brain Res 752: 81–89, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alger BE, Nicoll RA. Spontaneous inhibitory post-synaptic potentials in hippocampus: mechanism for tonic inhibition. Brain Res 200: 195–200, 1980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alonso A, Khateb A, Fort P, Jones BE, Muhlethaler M. Differential oscillatory properties of cholinergic, and noncholinergic nucleus basalis neurons in guinea pig brain slice. Eur J Neurosci 8: 169–182, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alreja M, Liu W. Noradrenaline induces IPSCs in rat medial septal/diagonal band neurons: involvement of septohippocampal GABAergic neurons. J Physiol 494: 201–215, 1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Altmann H, Ten Bruggencate G, Pickelmann P, Steinberg (1976) Effects of GABA R, glycine, picrotoxin, and bicuculline methochloride on rubrospinal neurones in cats. Brain Res 111: 337–345, 1976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aston-Jones G, Shaver R, Dinan T. Cortically projecting nucleus basalis neurons in rat are physiologically heterogeneous. Neurosci Lett 46: 19–24, 1984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bengtson CP, Osborne PB. Electrophysiological properties of cholinergic, and noncholinergic neurons in the ventral pallidal region of the nucleus basalis in rat brain slices. J Neurophysiol 83: 2649–2660, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brauer K, Seeger G, Hartig W, Rossner S, Poethke R, Kacza J, Schliebs R, Bruckner G, Bigl V. Electron microscopic evidence for a cholinergic innervation of GABAergic parvalbumin-immunoreactive neurons in the rat medial septum. J Neurosci Res 54: 248–253, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Buzsaki G, Bickford RG, Ponomareff G, Thal LJ, Mandel R, Gage FH. Nucleus basalis, and thalamic control of neocortical activity in the freely moving rat. J Neurosci 8: 4007–4026, 1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Collingridge GL, Gage PW, Robertson B. Inhibitory post-synaptic currents in rat hippocampal CA1 neurones. J Physiol 356: 551–564, 1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Costa RM, Lin SC, Sotnikova TD, Cyr M, Gainetdinov RR, Caron MG, Nicolelis MA. Rapid alterations in corticostriatal ensemble coordination during acute dopamine-dependent motor dysfunction. Neuron 52: 359–369, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Detari L. Tonic and phasic influence of basal forebrain unit activity on the cortical EEG. Behav Brain Res 115: 159–170, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Detari L, Vanderwolf CH. Activity of identified cortically projecting, and other basal forebrain neurones during large slow waves and cortical activation in anaesthetized rats. Brain Res 437: 1–8, 1987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Detari L, Juhasz G, Kukorelli T. Neuronal firing in the pallidal region: firing patterns during sleep-wakefulness cycle in cats. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 67: 159–166, 1987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Duque A, Balatoni B, Detari L, Zaborszky L. EEG correlation of the discharge properties of identified neurons in the basal forebrain. J Neurophysiol 84: 1627–1635, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Duque A, Tepper JM, Detari L, Ascoli GA, Zaborszky L. Morphological characterization of electrophysiologically, and immunohistochemically identified basal forebrain cholinergic and neuropeptide Y-containing neurons. Brain Struct Funct 212: 55–73, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Easaw JC, Petrov T, Jhamandas JH. An electrophysiological study of neurons in the horizontal limb of the diagonal band of Broca. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 272: C163–C172, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Eurich CW, Wilke SD. Multidimensional encoding strategy of spiking neurons. Neural Comput 12: 1519–1529, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. Central cholinergic systems, and cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 48: 649–684, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Felmy F, Schneggenburger R. Developmental expression of the Ca2+-binding proteins calretinin, and parvalbumin at the calyx of held of rats and mice. Eur J Neurosci 20: 1473–1482, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ferreira G, Meurisse M, Tillet Y, Levy F. Distribution and co-localization of choline acetyltransferase and p75 neurotrophin receptors in the sheep basal forebrain: implications for the use of a specific cholinergic immunotoxin. Neuroscience 104: 419–439, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fort P, Khateb A, Serafin M, Muhlethaler M, Jones BE. Pharmacological characterization, and differentiation of non-cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons in vitro. Neuroreport 9: 61–65, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Freund TF, Gulyas AI. GABAergic interneurons containing calbindin D28K or somatostatin are major targets of GABAergic basal forebrain afferents in the rat neocortex. J Comp Neurol 314: 187–199, 1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Freund TF, Meskenaite V. Gamma-aminobutyric acid-containing basal forebrain neurons innervate inhibitory interneurons in the neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 738–742, 1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fries P, Reynolds JH, Rorie AE, Desimone R. Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science 291: 1560–1563, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gauck V, Jaeger D. The control of rate, and timing of spikes in the deep cerebellar nuclei by inhibition. J Neurosci 20: 3006–3016, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gehlert DR. Subtypes of receptors for neuropeptide Y: implications for the targeting of therapeutics. Life Sci 55: 551–562, 1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gray CM. Synchronous oscillations in neuronal systems: mechanisms, and functions. J Comput Neurosci 1: 11–38, 1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Griffith WH. Membrane properties of cell types within guinea pig basal forebrain nuclei in vitro. J Neurophysiol 59: 1590–1612, 1988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gritti I, Mainville L, Mancia M, Jones BE. GABAergic, and other noncholinergic basal forebrain neurons, together with cholinergic neurons, project to the mesocortex and isocortex in the rat. J Comp Neurol 383: 163–177, 1997 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Harman D. Alzheimer's disease: role of aging in pathogenesis. Ann NY Acad Sci 959: ; discussion 463–385, 2002384–395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Harman D. Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis: role of aging. Ann NY Acad Sci 1067: 454–460, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hartig W, Seeger J, Naumann T, Brauer K, Bruckner G. Selective in vivo fluorescence labelling of cholinergic neurons containing p75(NTR) in the rat basal forebrain. Brain Res 808: 155–165, 1988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hassani OK, Henny P, Lee MG, Jones BE. GABAergic neurons intermingled with orexin, and MCH neurons in the lateral hypothalamus discharge maximally during sleep. Eur J Neurosci 32: 448–457, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hasselmo ME, Giocomo LM. Cholinergic modulation of cortical function. J Mol Neurosci 30: 133–135, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huh CY, Goutagny R, Williams S. Glutamatergic neurons of the mouse medial septum, and diagonal band of Broca synaptically drive hippocampal pyramidal cells: relevance for hippocampal theta rhythm. J Neurosci 30: 15951–15961, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hur EE, Zaborszky L. Vglut2 afferents to the medial prefrontal, and primary somatosensory cortices: a combined retrograde tracing in situ hybridization study [corrected]. J Comp Neurol 483: 351–373, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hur EE, Edwards RH, Rommer E, Zaborszky L. Vesicular glutamate transporter 1, and vesicular glutamate transporter 2 synapses on cholinergic neurons in the sublenticular gray of the rat basal forebrain: a double-label electron microscopic study. Neuroscience 164: 1721–1731, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jaeger D, De Schutter E, Bower JM. The role of synaptic, and voltage-gated currents in the control of Purkinje cell spiking: a modeling study. J Neurosci 17: 91–106, 1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jones BE. Arousal systems. Front Biosci 8: s438–451, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Jones BE. Activity, modulation, and role of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons innervating the cerebral cortex. Prog Brain Res 145: 157–169, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kacza J, Grosche J, Seeger J, Brauer K, Bruckner G, Hartig W. Laser scanning, and electron microscopic evidence for rapid and specific in vivo labelling of cholinergic neurons in the rat basal forebrain with fluorochromated antibodies. Brain Res 867: 232–238, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Khateb A, Fort P, Williams S, Serafin M, Muhlethaler M, Jones BE. GABAergic input to cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons. Neuroscience 86: 937–947, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Klapstein GJ, Colmers WF. Neuropeptide Y suppresses epileptiform activity in rat hippocampus in vitro. J Neurophysiol 78: 1651–1661, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee MG, Manns ID, Alonso A, Jones BE. Sleep-wake related discharge properties of basal forebrain neurons recorded with micropipettes in head-fixed rats. J Neurophysiol 92: 1182–1198, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lewis JE, Kristan WB., Jr Representation of touch location by a population of leech sensory neurons. J Neurophysiol 80: 2584–2592, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lin J, Ozeki M, Javel E, Zhao Z, Pan W, Schlentz E, Levine S. Identification of gene expression profiles in rat ears with cDNA microarrays. Hear Res 175: 2–13, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lin SC, Nicolelis MA. Neuronal ensemble bursting in the basal forebrain encodes salience irrespective of valence. Neuron 59: 138–149, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lin SC, Gervasoni D, Nicolelis MA. Fast modulation of prefrontal cortex activity by basal forebrain noncholinergic neuronal ensembles. J Neurophysiol 96: 3209–3219, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Llinas RR. I of the Vortex: from Neurons to Self. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  51. Manns ID, Alonso A, Jones BE. Discharge properties of juxtacellularly labeled, and immunohistochemically identified cholinergic basal forebrain neurons recorded in association with the electroencephalogram in anesthetized rats. J Neurosci 20: 1505–1518, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. McCulloch WS. Embodiments of Mind. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1965 [Google Scholar]
  53. McLin DE, III, Miasnikov AA, Weinberger NM. Induction of behavioral associative memory by stimulation of the nucleus basalis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 4002–4007, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. McQuiston AR, Petrozzino JJ, Connor JA, Colmers WF. Neuropeptide Y1 receptors inhibit N type calcium currents and reduce transient calcium increases in rat dentate granule cells. J Neurosci 16: 1422–1429, 1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mesulam MM. The cholinergic innervation of the human cerebral cortex. Prog Brain Res 145: 67–78, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Morton RA, Davies CH. Regulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated synaptic responses by adenosine receptors in the rat hippocampus. J Physiol 502: 75–90, 1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Murchison D, Griffith WH. Age-related alterations in caffeine-sensitive calcium stores, and mitochondrial buffering in rat basal forebrain. Cell Calcium 25: 439–452, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Murchison D, Griffith WH. Calcium buffering systems, and calcium signaling in aged rat basal forebrain neurons. Aging Cell 6: 297–305, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nickerson Poulin A, Guerci A, El Mestikawy S, Semba K. Vesicular glutamate transporter 3 immunoreactivity is present in cholinergic basal forebrain neurons projecting to the basolateral amygdala in rat. J Comp Neurol 498: 690–711, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ovsepian SV. Enhancement of the synchronized firing of CA1 pyramidal cells by medial septum preconditioning: time-dependent involvement of muscarinic cholinoceptors, and GABAB receptors. Neurosci Lett 393: 1–6, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ovsepian SV. Differential cholinergic modulation of synaptic encoding, and gain control mechanisms in rat hippocampus. Neurosci Res 61: 92–98, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ovsepian SV, Friel DD. The leaner P/Q type calcium channel mutation renders cerebellar Purkinje neurons hyper-excitable, and eliminates Ca2+-Na+ spike bursts. Eur J Neurosci 27: 93–103, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ovsepian SV, Friel DD. Enhanced synaptic inhibition disrupts the efferent code of cerebellar Purkinje neurons in leaner Ca(v)2.1 Ca (2+) channel mutant mice. Cerebellum 2010. September 16 [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Ovsepian SV, Anwyl R, Rowan MJ. Endogenous acetylcholine lowers the threshold for long-term potentiation induction in the CA1 area through muscarinic receptor activation: in vivo study. Eur J Neurosci 20: 1267–1275, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Pang K, Tepper JM, Zaborszky L. Morphological and electrophysiological characteristics of noncholinergic basal forebrain neurons. J Comp Neurol 394: 186–204, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Peinado A. Traveling slow waves of neural activity: a novel form of network activity in developing neocortex. J Neurosci 20: RC54, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Pronchuk N, Beck-Sickinger AG, Colmers WF. Multiple NPY receptors Inhibit GABA(A) synaptic responses of rat medial parvocellular effector neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Endocrinology 143: 535–543, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Roussel C, Erneux T, Schiffmann SN, Gall D. Modulation of neuronal excitability by intracellular calcium buffering: from spiking to bursting. Cell Calcium 39: 455–466, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Salin PA, Prince DA. Spontaneous GABAA receptor-mediated inhibitory currents in adult rat somatosensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 75: 1573–1588, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sanger TD. Neural population codes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13: 238–249, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Segal M. Properties of rat medial septal neurones recorded in vitro. J Physiol 379: 309–330, 1986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Semba K. Multiple output pathways of the basal forebrain: organization, chemical heterogeneity, and roles in vigilance. Behav Brain Res 115: 117–141, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sotty F, Danik M, Manseau F, Laplante F, Quirion R, Williams S. Distinct electrophysiological properties of glutamatergic, cholinergic, and GABAergic rat septohippocampal neurons: novel implications for hippocampal rhythmicity. J Physiol 551: 927–943, 2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Stone TW. Neuropharmacology of quinolinic, and kynurenic acids. Pharmacol Rev 45: 309–379, 1993 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Szymusiak R, McGinty D. Sleep-related neuronal discharge in the basal forebrain of cats. Brain Res 370: 82–92, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Toescu EC, Verkhratsky A. Parameters of calcium homeostasis in normal neuronal ageing. J Anat 197: 563–569, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Toth A, Hajnik T, Zaborszky L, Detari L. Effect of basal forebrain neuropeptide Y administration on sleep, and spontaneous behavior in freely moving rats. Brain Res Bull 72: 293–301, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Toth K, Freund TF, Miles R. Disinhibition of rat hippocampal pyramidal cells by GABAergic afferents from the septum. J Physiol 500: 463–474, 1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Uhlhaas PJ, Singer W. Abnormal neural oscillations, and synchrony in schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci 11: 100–113, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Velumian AA, Carlen PL. Differential control of three after-hyperpolarizations in rat hippocampal neurones by intracellular calcium buffering. J Physiol 517: 201–216, 1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Williams SR, Christensen SR, Stuart GJ, Hausser M. Membrane potential bistability is controlled by the hyperpolarization-activated current I.(H.) in rat cerebellar Purkinje neurons in vitro. J Physiol 539: 469–483, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wojda U, Salinska E, Kuznicki J. Calcium ions in neuronal degeneration. IUBMB Life 60: 575–590, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Wu M, Shanabrough M, Leranth C, Alreja M. Cholinergic excitation of septohippocampal GABA but not cholinergic neurons: implications for learning, and memory. J Neurosci 20: 3900–3908, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wu M, Hajszan T, Xu C, Leranth C, Alreja M. Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor activation produces a direct excitation of identified septohippocampal cholinergic neurons. J Neurophysiol 92: 1216–1225, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Xu C, Michelsen KA, Wu M, Morozova E, Panula P, Alreja M. Histamine innervation, and activation of septohippocampal GABAergic neurones: involvement of local ACh release. J Physiol 561: 657–670, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zaborszky L, Duque A. Sleep-wake mechanisms, and basal forebrain circuitry. Front Biosci 8: d1146–1169, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Zaborszky L, Heimer L, Eckenstein F, Leranth C. GABAergic input to cholinergic forebrain neurons: an ultrastructural study using retrograde tracing of H.RP, and double immunolabeling. J Comp Neurol 250: 282–295, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Zaborszky L, Duque A, Alreja M, Ovsepian SV. Effect of NPY in the cholinergic basal forebrain in rat: double-immunolabeling electron microscopy and in vitro electrophysiological studies (Abstract). Neuropeptides: 10 Neuropharm. Conference Satellite to the SFN 2009 Program and Abstract Book (P2.1.04), 2009 [Google Scholar]
  89. Zaborszky L, Pang K, Somogyi J, Nadasdy Z, Kallo I. The basal forebrain corticopetal system revisited. Ann NY Acad Sci 877: 339–367, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurophysiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES