Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2012 May 2;53(29):3722–3726. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.04.121

Lithiation and Electrophilic Substitution of Dimethyl Triazones

Sunkyu Han 1, Dustin S Siegel 1, Mohammad Movassaghi 1
PMCID: PMC3404850  NIHMSID: NIHMS374747  PMID: 22844161

Abstract

The lithiation and electrophilic substitution of dimethyl triazones is described. Directed lithiation or tin-lithium exchange of dimethyl triazones afforded the corresponding dipole stabilized nucleophiles that were trapped with various electrophiles. Keto-triazone derivatives accessed by acylation of such nucleophiles were readily converted to the corresponding imidazolone heterocycles.

Keywords: Triazone, Lithiation, Urea, Imidazolone, Synthesis


Complex-induced proximity effects have been utilized extensively to functionalize otherwise unactivated sites of a molecule.i In particular, the metalation and electrophilic substitution of carbon centers adjacent to a nitrogen bearing an electron withdrawing group has been studied extensively,ii and several examples of the directed lithiation of alkyl urea derivatives have been reported.iii However, there have been no previous reports of the lithiation of alkyl triazone derivatives. While triazones have found great utility in protection of primary amines,iv their potential use to mask urea functional groupings has received far less attention.v In the context of our studies concerning the total synthesis of the agelastatin alkaloids,vi we employed metalated triazone 1 as a synthetic equivalent of metalated urea 2 to access functionalized urea derivative 3 (Scheme 1). Herein, we report our observation on the directed lithiation and electrophilic substitution of 1,3-dimethyl triazones in addition to derivatization of related keto-triazones to the corresponding imidazolone heterocycles.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Use of the metalated triazone 1 as a synthetic equivalent of a metalated urea 2.

For these studies, we prepared several 1,3-dimethyl triazones by direct condensation of dimethyl urea (4), formalin, and various primary amines (Table 1).iva,ivb Trimethyl triazone 6a was prepared in 42% yield after purification by vacuum distillation (Table 1, entry 1). The isopropyl and mesityl triazones (6b and 6c) were obtained in 20% and 21% yields, respectively (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). Notably, the benzyl and p-toluene triazones 6d and 6e were both readily prepared on greater than 30 gram scale in 91% and 71% yield, respectively (Table 1, entries 4 and 5), and could be efficiently purified by recrystallization from hexanes, rendering them particularly attractive urea surrogate from a preparative standpoint.

Table 1.

Synthesis of triazones

graphic file with name nihms374747u1.jpg
Entry Amine Time (h) Yield of 6 (%)
1 5a, R = Me 24 42a
2 5b, R = iPr 24 20b
3 5c, R = Mesityl 48 21b
4 5d, R = Bn 17 91c
5 5e, R = C6H4-p-Me 19 71c
a

Purified by distillation.

b

Purified by silica gel flash column chromatography.

c

Purified by recrystallization from hexanes.

We next examined the directed lithiation of 1,3-dimethyl triazones. Treatment of the 1,3-dimethyl triazone derivatives with one equivalent of s-butyl lithium at −78 °C in THF followed by quenching with deuterium oxide afforded the corresponding triazone products with complete deuterium incorporation at the methyl group α to the nitrogen (Table 2). Under optimal conditions the lithiation of the methyl and benzyl triazones 6a and 6d, respectively, with s-butyl lithium followed by quenching with deuterium oxide afforded the corresponding monodeuterated products in moderate yields (41% and 50%, respectively; Table 2, entries 1 and 3). Unfortunately, these reactions were plagued by the rapid formation of self-condensation byproducts via addition of the lithiated triazone to the C2-carbonyl of another triazone. The yields for the formation of the deuterated benzyl triazone were identical when quenched after 10, 30, or 60 min periods, which suggests that once formed, the lithiated triazone intermediates were stable at −78 °C for up to one hour (Table 2, entries 3–5). Interestingly, the mesityl and toluyl triazones 6c and 6e, respectively, underwent the lithiation and deuteration sequence with greater efficiency to afford the monodeuterated products 7c and 7e in 95% and 85% yield, respectively (Table 2, entries 2 and 6). Importantly, we observed that the formation of undesired self-condensation byproducts was significantly suppressed with these substrates. It should be noted that the use of s-butyllithium was found to be optimal for the lithiation of dimethyl triazones. Attempted use of n-butyllithium as the base additive predominantly led to undesired addition of the butyl group to the C2 carbonyl group of the urea. Alternatively, the use of t-butyllithium as the base additive resulted in formation of a complex mixture of products consistent with indiscriminate lithiation of the triazone substrates at undesired positions. Furthermore, metal amides were ineffective as the base additive at −78 °C and their use at higher temperatures was complicated by decomposition of lithiated triazone intermediates. Finally, inclusion of other common additives such as tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) or hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA) in combination with s-butyllithium gave no clear advantage.

Table 2.

Directed lithiation and deuterium incorporation of 1,3-dimethyl triazone

graphic file with name nihms374747u2.jpg
Entry Substrate Time (min) Yield of 7a (%)
1 6a, R = Me 10 41
2 6c, R = Mes 15 95
3 6d, R = Bn 10 50
4 6d, R = Bn 30 50
5 6d, R = Bn 60 50
6 6e, R = C6H4-p-Me 15 85
a

Products showed complete monodeuterium incorporation at C7.

We then evaluated the reactivity of various electrophiles with the lithiated triazones (Table 3). The lithiated triazones underwent nucleophilic addition to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes (Table 3, entry 1–3) and benzaldehyde (Table 3, entry 4) in moderate yields (47–70%). Methyl ester derivatives were suitable electrophiles for this chemistry and afforded the corresponding keto-triazone products (Table 3, entries 5–13). The use of 2.5 equivalents of the triazone nucleophile resulted in full and efficient conversion of methyl benzoate (12) to ketone 22 (Table 3, entry 5). In more challenging cases, an increase in the equivalents of the nucleophile led to an increase in the yield of the desired adduct (Table 3, entries 6–8, and 11–12). The use of excess lithiated triazone allowed for the generation of the desired keto-triazones 25c and 25e from methyl ester 15, which contains an acidic lactam N–H proton (Table 3, entry 11–13). However, when a large excess of lithiated triazone was used, we sometimes observed the formation of minor double-addition byproducts. The lithiated triazone could also be trapped with trialkyltin chlorides to afford versatile and stable α-stannylated triazones 26d–e and 27d–e (Table 3, entry 14–17)–substrates that allowed for a more practical C–C bond formation (vide infra).vii,viii

Table 3.

Triazone addition to various electrophiles

graphic file with name nihms374747u3.jpg
Entry Substrate Electrophile Triazone (equiv) Product Yielda(%)
1b 6d graphic file with name nihms374747t1.jpg 2 graphic file with name nihms374747t2.jpg 70
2b 6d graphic file with name nihms374747t3.jpg 2 graphic file with name nihms374747t4.jpg 17
3b 6d graphic file with name nihms374747t5.jpg 1.7 graphic file with name nihms374747t6.jpg 47
4b 6d graphic file with name nihms374747t7.jpg 1.7 graphic file with name nihms374747t8.jpg 65
5 6a graphic file with name nihms374747t9.jpg 2.5 graphic file with name nihms374747t10.jpg 91
6b 6d graphic file with name nihms374747t11.jpg 2 graphic file with name nihms374747t12.jpg 21
7b 6d 4 49
8b 6d 6 70
9 6a graphic file with name nihms374747t13.jpg 2 graphic file with name nihms374747t14.jpg 37
10b 6d 6 80
11 6c graphic file with name nihms374747t15.jpg 3.5 graphic file with name nihms374747t16.jpg 50
12 6c 4 72
13c 6e 4 65
14d 6d Bu3SnCl 16 1 graphic file with name nihms374747t17.jpg 45
15e 6e Bu3SnCl 16 1 64
16 6d Cy3SnCl 17 2 graphic file with name nihms374747t18.jpg 90
17e 6e Cy3SnCl 17 1 45
a

Isolated yield after purification.

b

TMEDA (2 equiv) was used as an additive.

c

HMPA (2 equiv) was used as an additive.

d

1.5 equivalent of trialkyltin chloride was used.

e

1.1 equivalent of trialkyltin chloride was used.

Mes: mesityl

Despite the successful direct lithiation of 1,3-dimethyl triazones described above, the formation of triazone self-condensation byproducts complicated the reaction, and an excess of the triazone was needed to form the desired products efficiently (Table 3, entries 8 and 10). In order to address this issue, we evaluated whether tin-lithium exchange could generate the lithiated triazones with greater efficiency.ix When stannyl triazone 26d was treated with one equivalent of n-butyllithium at −78 °C in THF, the desired lithiated triazone intermediate was obtained quantitatively. Importantly, the rapid rate of tin-lithium exchange completely suppressed the formation of self-condensation byproducts. This method required only two equivalents of lithiated triazone (via tin-lithium exchange) to convert methyl ester 14 to ketone 24d in 74% yield (Table 4, entry 1) as compared to the six equivalents required using the direct lithiation route (Table 3, entry 10). Additionally, conversion of methyl ester 15 to the corresponding keto-triazone 25 using reagents generated through tin-lithium exchange afforded the desired keto-triazone products in higher yields than the direct lithiation protocol previously described (Table 4, entries 2–4).

Table 4.

Nucleophilic addition of the lithiated triazone obtained by tin-lithium exchange

graphic file with name nihms374747u4.jpg
Entry Substrate Electrophile Stannane(equiv) Product Yielda (%)
1 26d, R = Bn graphic file with name nihms374747t13.jpg 2 graphic file with name nihms374747t19.jpg 74
2 26a, R = Me graphic file with name nihms374747t15.jpg 3 graphic file with name nihms374747t20.jpg 62
3 26d, R = Bn 3.5 83
4 26e, R = C6H4-p-Me 3.5 80
3.5
a

Isolated yield after purification.

Finally, we investigated the synthesis of imidazolones from keto-triazones.vi,x To our delight, the triazone moiety in 28 could be readily hydrolyzed in the presence of aqueous hydrochloric acid in methanol at 23 °C. The 2,3-disubstituted imidazolone 30 was obtained in 83% yield through a condensative cyclization of a putative keto-urea intermediate 29 (Scheme 2).vi,xi

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Formation of imidazolone 30 from keto-triazone 28. Reagents and Conditions: (a) 0.5 N HCl (2 equiv), MeOH, 23 °C, 83%. PMB: p-methoxybenzyl

The alkylation of these versatile keto-triazones provides an expedient route to trisubstituted imidazolones. For example, the methylation of keto-triazone 31 occurred efficiently via its deprotonation with sodium hydride followed by treatment of the corresponding enolate with methyl iodide to afford keto-triazone 32 in 91% yield (Scheme 3). When the methylated keto-triazone 32 was treated with aqueous hydrochloric acid in methanol at 63 °C, 2,4-dimethyl-3-phenyl imidazolone 33 was obtained in 100% yield.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Formation of trisubstituted imidazolone 33. Reagents and Conditions: (a) NaH (1.2 equiv), MeI (2 equiv), DMF, 0→23 °C, 91%; (b) 0.5 N HCl (2 equiv), MeOH, 63 °C, 100%.

In summary, we have described the utility of 1,3-dimethyl triazones in the introduction of a urea functional grouping through directed lithiation to afford dipole-stabilized lithiated triazone intermediates that can be trapped with various electrophiles (Table 3). We have also shown that stannylated triazones prepared from such lithiated triazones provide a highly efficient source of the desired lithiated triazones and can lead to significant improvement in more complex unions (Table 4). The resulting keto-triazones not only provide further opportunity for introduction of additional substituents but they also serve as excellent precursors for the corresponding imidazolone heterocycles.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge financial support by NIH-NIGMS (GM074825). M.M. is a Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • i.Beak P, Meyers AI. Acc Chem Res. 1986;19:356.. For a review, see: Whisler MC, MacNeil S, Snieckus V, Beak P. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:2206. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300590.
  • ii.Beak P, Zajdel WJ. Chem Rev. 1984;84:471. [Google Scholar]
  • iii.Hassel T, Seebach D. Helv Chim Acta. 1978;61:2237.Resek J, Beak P. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:405.Anderson DR, Faibish NC, Beak P. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:7553.Clayden J, Turner H, Pickworth M, Adler T. Org Lett. 2005;7:3147. doi: 10.1021/ol0508025.Clayden J, Dufour J, Grainger DM, Helliwell M. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:7488. doi: 10.1021/ja071523a.Bach R, Clayden J, Hennecke U. Synlett. 2009:421.Smith K, El-Hiti GA, Hegazy AS, Kariuki B. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2011;7:1219. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.7.142.. For an example of directed lithiation of DMPU, see: Sun X, Collum DB. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:2459.
  • iv.(a) Knapp S, Hale JJ, Bastos M, Gibson BF. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:2109. [Google Scholar]; (b) Knapp S, Hale JJ, Bastos M, Moline A, Chen KY. J Org Chem. 1992;57:6239. [Google Scholar]; (c) Knight SD, Overman LE, Pairaudeau G. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:9293. [Google Scholar]; (d) Pearson WH, Lee IY, Mi Y, Stoy P. J Org Chem. 2004;69:9109. doi: 10.1021/jo048917u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • i.(a) Shimizu LS, Smith MD, Hughes AD, Shimizu KD. Chem Comm. 2001:1592. doi: 10.1039/b102159c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xu Y, Smith MD, Krause JA, Shimizu LS. J Org Chem. 2009;74:4874. doi: 10.1021/jo900443e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Tian L, Wnag C, Dawn S, Smith MD, Krause JA, Shimizu LS. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:17620. doi: 10.1021/ja906474z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • vi.Movassaghi M, Siegel DS, Han S. Chem Sci. 2010;1:561. doi: 10.1039/c0sc00351d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • vii.For the use of 27e in the copper mediated cross-coupling reaction with a key thioester, see: reference 6.
  • viii.Representative experimental procedure for lithiation and electrophilic trapping of a dimethyl triazone–synthesis of stannyltriazone 27e: To a solution of triazone 6e (10.0 g, 46.0 mmol, 1 equiv) in tetrahydrofuran (400 mL) at −78 °C under an argon atmosphere was added s-butyllithium (1.4 M in cyclohexane, 34.5 mL, 48.0 mmol, 1.05 equiv) rapidly via cannula. After 10 min, the resulting bright orange mixture was transferred via cannula over a 15 min period to a solution of tricyclohexyltin chloride (20.3 g, 50.0 mmol, 1.10 equiv) in tetrahydrofuran (400 mL) at −78 °C. After 1.5 h, saturated aqueous ammonium chloride solution (100 mL) was added via syringe, and approximately 80% of the volatiles were removed by concentration of the mixture under reduced pressure. The residue was partitioned between dichloromethane (800 mL) and water (800 mL). The layers were separated, and the organic layer was washed with brine (800 mL), was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue absorbed onto silica gel was loaded as a solid, and was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel: diam. 6 cm, ht. 15 cm; eluent: hexanes then 10% ethyl acetate in hexanes) to afford stannyltriazone 27e (12.1 g, 45%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 20 °C): δ 7.07 (app-dd, J = 8.7, 0.7 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (app-d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H,), 4.60 (s, 2H), 4.58 (s, 2H), 2.85 (s, 3H), 2.78 (t, J = 12.2 Hz, 2H), 2.27 (s, 3H), 1.82-1.74 (m, 6H), 1.65-1.56 (m, 9H), 1.52-1.13 (m, 18H). 13C NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3, 20 °C): δ 156.3, 146.1, 132.2, 130.0, 119.5, 69.2, 67.3, 32.7, 32.3, 29.5, 28.7, 27.9, 27.4, 20.8. FTIR (neat) cm−1: 2915 (s), 2844 (s), 1636 (s), 1515 (s), 1444 (s), 1407 (m), 1299 (s), 1201 (m), 991 (m). HRMS (m/z): calc’d for C30H50N3OSn, [M+H]+: 588.2987, found: 588.2982. TLC (15% ethyl acetate in hexanes), Rf: 0.20 (CAM, UV).
  • ix.(a) Peterson D. J Organometal Chem. 1970;21:63. [Google Scholar]; (b) Pearson WH, Lindbeck AC, Kampf JW. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:2622. [Google Scholar]
  • x.Zav’yalov SI, Ezhova GI, Kravchenko NE, Kulikova LB, Dorofeeva OV, Rumyantseva EE, Zavozin AG. Pharm Chem J. 2004;38:256. [Google Scholar]
  • xi.(a) Marckwald W. Chem Ber. 1892;25:2354. [Google Scholar]; (b) Duschinsky R, Dolan LA. J Am Chem Soc. 1946;68:2350. doi: 10.1021/ja01215a064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES