Abstract
Nuclear genomes of eukaryotes are bombarded by a continuous deluge of organellar DNA which contributes significantly to eukaryote evolution. Here, we present a new PCR-based method that allows the specific amplification of nuclear integrants of organellar DNA (norgs) by exploiting recent deletions present in organellar genome sequences. We have used this method to amplify nuclear integrants of plastid DNA (nupts) from the nuclear genomes of several nicotiana species and to study the evolutionary forces acting upon these sequences. The role of nupts in endosymbiotic evolution and the different genetic factors influencing the time available for a chloroplastic gene to be functionally relocated in the nucleus are discussed.
Keywords: DNA transfer, endosymbiotic evolution, functional gene relocation, functional gene transfer, norg, numt, nupt, organelle
Eukaryotic cells arose more than a billion years ago when an ancestor of the nucleated cell engulfed a free-living α-proteobacterium1 followed by a cyanobacterium2 that were gradually converted into mitochondria and chloroplasts (plastids) respectively. Since these events, there is a continuous influx of organellar DNA entering the nuclear genome.3-5 Organellar DNA in the nucleus is referred as numts (nuclear integrants of mitochondrial DNA6) and nupts (nuclear integrants of plastid DNA7) or collectively as norgs (nuclear integrants of organelle DNA8). These norgs contribute significantly to eukaryote evolution by providing a major source of genetic diversity. They also create new genes,9 new nuclear exons encoding parts of novel proteins10,11 and novel gene regulatory elements.12
Interestingly, the large reduction in organelle genome size that accompanied endosymbiotic transfer of cytoplasmic organellar genes to the nucleus did not greatly change the spectrum of proteins required for function and biogenesis of the cytoplasmic organelles.7 Genes derived from organellar genomes are prokaryote-like and do not immediately become functional when transferred to the nuclear genome. The rare adaptation of an organellar gene in this new environment requires the acquisition of nuclear gene regulatory elements and a target peptide if the protein is to be functional within the organelle.13,14 The number of nuclear regulatory elements required for function of an organellar gene presumably varies since some plastid promoters (e.g., psbA) can function in the nucleus,14,15 some organellar genes encode cryptic organellar protein targeting signals16 and sequences in the 3′UTR of some plastid genes can promote cytoplasmic mRNA polyadenylation.13,14
To elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which a norg-encoded gene becomes functional in the nucleus and replaces the organellar version, it is necessary to understand the evolutionary fate of norg sequences. In general, such studies have been confined to a few seed plants having both nuclear and organellar genomes sequenced17-22 and are likely to be compromised by large contiguous norg sequences being excluded as “contaminating” bona fide organellar DNA during nuclear genome assembly. The experimental isolation of norg sequences is greatly complicated by the presence of higher copy numbers of organellar genomes compared with nuclear genomes in most cells. Previous studies have relied upon differential methylation23 between the organellar and the nuclear genomes and only allowed the characterization of norgs that have recently been inserted. To circumvent these problems, we developed an innovative PCR-based method that allows the amplification of recent and older norgs (up to several millions of years old) in a range of eukaryotes. This method, presented in detail in Rousseau-Gueutin et al.,24 avoids the amplification of the high-copy number extant organellar genomes and allows the specific amplification of norg sequences by placing a PCR primer in a region recently deleted from the organellar genome. Organellar deletion events were identified by comparison of the organellar genomes of several closely related species. We have used this method to amplify nupts of several members of the Nicotiana genus as plastomes sequences were available for three Nicotiana species and four closely related Solanaceous species. We were able to sequence seven unrearranged nupts (25 kb in total) derived from various plastomic regions which encode several plastidic genes. The origin of the transfers and the evolutionary processes that have acted upon the nupts were then studied by sequence comparisons with the native cytoplasmic organellar genomes and those of closely related species.25 These nupts were estimated to have been transferred between appoximately 0.03 and 5.8 million years ago and we determined that potential protein-coding and non-coding sequences were evolving neutrally in the nuclear genome. Some of the nupts open reading frames (ORFs) were destroyed by indels leading to frameshifts and/or nucleotide substitutions causing premature stop codons (Fig. 1A and B). However, in several instances potential protein coding-sequences maintained intact ORFs (no indels but some substitutions). The oldest of these surviving ORFs was approximately 5.8 million years old, suggesting that lengthy periods are sometimes available for transferred chloroplast genes to gain nuclear function. This time will presumably vary depending upon the length of the ORF, the nature of its coding sequence, the conservation constraints on the amino-acid sequence, the physical location in the nuclear genome and to chance due to the stochastic nature of random mutations.
In rare cases of activation of an organellar gene in the nucleus (Fig. 1C), two functional copies will coexist in two separate genetic compartments of the cell until one became defunct. If the nuclear and organelle-encoded copies were equally efficient, loss of functionality is presumably the result of chance mutation silencing one or the other copy.26,27 Prime face this would generally favor the retention of the organelle copy since there is a higher substitution rate in the nuclear genome than in the plastome.28 In addition organellar genes are organized in operons and are usually uniparentally inherited, again favoring the status quo.29 If the nuclear copy becomes defunct (Fig. 1D), the whole process can be repeated with another nupt. However if the organellar copy looses its functionality, then the nucleus becomes the permanent location of that gene (Fig. 1E). This explains the net diminution of cytoplasmic organellar genomes and the increased genetic influence of the nucleus. It is noteworthy that this kind of functional relocation of organellar genes to the nucleus has ceased in animals but is still occurring in plants, although other genetic effects of norg integration (e.g., creation of new exons10 or increased genetic diversity) still continue in both kingdoms.30
Why have some genes remained in the cytoplasmic organelles? While some genes may remain in the plant plastome for reasons of maintaining redox balance,31 others could perhaps be relocated, but have so far failed to do so despite the long time available and the frequent transfer of organellar DNA. However, a few plastidic genes (e.g., accD, infA, rpl22 and rpl32) have recently relocated to the nucleus of some plants (reviewed in ref. 32) and more may soon be identified as a number of essential genes have been lost from the plastome in a variety of angiosperms.33 The process of organellar genome reduction therefore appears to be ongoing.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (project number DP0986973).
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- Mya
millions of years ago
- nupt
nuclear integrants of plastid DNA
- numt
nuclear integrants of mitochondrial DNA
- norg
nuclear integrants of organelle DNA
- UTR
untranslated region
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/psb/article/18762
References
- 1.Andersson SG, Karlberg O, Canbäck B, Kurland CG. On the origin of mitochondria: a genomics perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;358:165–77, discussion 177-9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Deusch O, Landan G, Roettger M, Gruenheit N, Kowallik KV, Allen JF, et al. Genes of cyanobacterial origin in plant nuclear genomes point to a heterocyst-forming plastid ancestor. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:748–61. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Thorsness PE, Fox TD. Escape of DNA from mitochondria to the nucleus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1990;346:376–9. doi: 10.1038/346376a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huang CY, Ayliffe MA, Timmis JN. Direct measurement of the transfer rate of chloroplast DNA into the nucleus. Nature. 2003;422:72–6. doi: 10.1038/nature01435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stegemann S, Hartmann S, Ruf S, Bock R. High-frequency gene transfer from the chloroplast genome to the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:8828–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1430924100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lopez JV, Yuhki N, Masuda R, Modi W, O’Brien SJ. Numt, a recent transfer and tandem amplification of mitochondrial DNA to the nuclear genome of the domestic cat. J Mol Evol. 1994;39:174–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00163806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Timmis JN, Ayliffe MA, Huang CY, Martin W. Endosymbiotic gene transfer: organelle genomes forge eukaryotic chromosomes. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:123–35. doi: 10.1038/nrg1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leister D. Origin, evolution and genetic effects of nuclear insertions of organelle DNA. Trends Genet. 2005;21:655–63. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Martin W, Rujan T, Richly E, Hansen A, Cornelsen S, Lins T, et al. Evolutionary analysis of Arabidopsis, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:12246–51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.182432999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Noutsos C, Kleine T, Armbruster U, DalCorso G, Leister D. Nuclear insertions of organellar DNA can create novel patches of functional exon sequences. Trends Genet. 2007;23:597–601. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kleine T, Maier UG, Leister D. DNA transfer from organelles to the nucleus: the idiosyncratic genetics of endosymbiosis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:115–38. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Knoop V, Brennicke A. A mitochondrial intron sequence in the 5′-flanking region of a plant nuclear lectin gene. Curr Genet. 1991;20:423–5. doi: 10.1007/BF00317072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stegemann S, Bock R. Experimental reconstruction of functional gene transfer from the tobacco plastid genome to the nucleus. Plant Cell. 2006;18:2869–78. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.046466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lloyd AH, Timmis JN. The origin and characterization of new nuclear genes originating from a cytoplasmic organellar genome. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2019–28. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cornelissen M, Vandewiele M. Nuclear transcriptional activity of the tobacco plastid psbA promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:19–29. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ueda M, Fujimoto M, Arimura SI, Tsutsumi N, Kadowaki KI. Presence of a latent mitochondrial targeting signal in gene on mitochondrial genome. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1791–3. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shahmuradov IA, Akbarova YY, Solovyev VV, Aliyev JA. Abundance of plastid DNA insertions in nuclear genomes of rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2003;52:923–34. doi: 10.1023/A:1025472709537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Richly E, Leister D. NUPTs in sequenced eukaryotes and their genomic organization in relation to NUMTs. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21:1972–80. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Huang CY, Grünheit N, Ahmadinejad N, Timmis JN, Martin W. Mutational decay and age of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes transferred recently to angiosperm nuclear chromosomes. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:1723–33. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.060327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Matsuo M, Ito Y, Yamauchi R, Obokata J. The rice nuclear genome continuously integrates, shuffles, and eliminates the chloroplast genome to cause chloroplast-nuclear DNA flux. Plant Cell. 2005;17:665–75. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.027706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Noutsos C, Richly E, Leister D. Generation and evolutionary fate of insertions of organelle DNA in the nuclear genomes of flowering plants. Genome Res. 2005;15:616–28. doi: 10.1101/gr.3788705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guo XY, Ruan SL, Hu WM, Cai D, Fan LJ. Chloroplast DNA insertions into the nuclear genome of rice: the genes, sites and ages of insertion involved. Funct Integr Genomics. 2008;8:101–8. doi: 10.1007/s10142-007-0067-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ayliffe MA, Scott NS, Timmis JN. Analysis of plastid DNA-like sequences within the nuclear genomes of higher plants. Mol Biol Evol. 1998;15:738–45. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rousseau-Gueutin M, Ayliffe MA, Timmis JN. Conservation of plastid sequences in the plant nuclear genome for millions of years facilitates endosymbiotic evolution. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:2181–93. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.185074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hazkani-Covo E, Sorek R, Graur D. Evolutionary dynamics of large numts in the human genome: rarity of independent insertions and abundance of post-insertion duplications. J Mol Evol. 2003;56:169–74. doi: 10.1007/s00239-002-2390-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Martin W, Herrmann RG. Gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus: how much, what happens, and Why? Plant Physiol. 1998;118:9–17. doi: 10.1104/pp.118.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Adams KL, Song K, Roessler PG, Nugent JM, Doyle JL, Doyle JJ, et al. Intracellular gene transfer in action: dual transcription and multiple silencings of nuclear and mitochondrial cox2 genes in legumes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:13863–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wolfe KH, Li WH, Sharp PM. Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:9054–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wicke S, Schneeweiss GM, dePamphilis CW, Müller KF, Quandt D. The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76:273–97. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hazkani-Covo E, Zeller RM, Martin W. Molecular poltergeists: mitochondrial DNA copies (numts) in sequenced nuclear genomes. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Allen JF. Redox control of gene-expression and the function of chloroplast genomes—an hypothesis. Photosynth Res. 1993;36:95–102. doi: 10.1007/BF00016274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rousseau-Gueutin M, Lloyd AH, Sheppard AE, Timmis JN. Gene transfer to the nucleus. In: Bullerwell C, ed. Organelle Genetics: Evolution of Organelle Genomes and Gene Expression. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2011:147-71. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Magee AM, Aspinall S, Rice DW, Cusack BP, Se´mon M, Perry AS, et al. Localized hypermutation and associated gene losses in legume chloroplast genomes. Genome Res. 2010;20:1700–10. doi: 10.1101/gr.111955.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]