Dear Editor,
The practice of emergency medicine is the ability to perform indicated clinical procedures in a skillful and safe manner.[1][2] Due to multiple factors, including the unpredictable nature of emergency medicine, clinical experience may be quite variable. So clinical experience in the emergency department (ED) is the foundation of emergency medicine.[3][4][5][6] In teaching hospitals, clinical encounter is an increasing significant component of medical students' curriculum [7][8] and one of the clinical experiences of medical students is emergency medicine.[9][10] Thus, all students who are graduated from medical schools should be capable of handling emergency situations.[11][12] While the clinical encounter is understood to be a significant educational experience, little is known about the information of medical students in response to clinical problems, specially in emergency cases. To date, many studies address physicians' information needs but few authors report studies describing medical students' information needs in the ED. The present study aims at analyzing the information needs of medical students in emergency departments which differs from most of the past studies by focusing on the information needs of students, rather than those of clinicians. This study seeks to provide a better understanding of students' information needs and analyzes the content of questions of medical students in response to a clinical encounter that can impact on the clinical education quality, the recognition of students' educational needs, and the educational improvement in emergency and better management of patients by medical students that decreases patient's stay and promotes patient's satisfaction.
The information needs of medical students in the emergency departments are evaluated at teaching hospitals in Iran University of Medical Sciences. A questionnaire was used. During observations, questions were asked by the medical students. In the questionnaire, following the review of the literature, a survey instrument was developed including 17 questions primarily related to the medical students' demographics data, and rate of information needs. Two sets of categories were developed to classify: 1) The content of the information needs recorded as questions and 2) the information need rate. The categorization of students' questions was based on the content of each question; such as diagnosis, treatment and organization. The categorization of information need rate was based on little, moderate and high.
Seventy medical students participated in the study while 45 (64%) were male. 350 questions were noted during our observations. 147 (42%) questions pertained to diagnosing the patient's problem. Organizational questions such as hospital policies and procedures made up a less portion of the questions asked by the students. The analysis revealed a statistical significant relationship (r-0.576, p<0.01) among the students' diagnostic and therapeutic questions. The students reported that the majority of their information needs were laboratories (n=59, 84.3%) and radiography results (n=52, 74.3%) and the least of them were medicolegal coordination (n=7, 10%). The Chi-square analysis revealed a statistical significant relationship among need rate to radiography, laboratory and drug treatment results (p<0.01).
Like those of experienced clinicians, students' information needs most often pertained to diagnosing a problem or choosing a treatment. Cogdill and Moore examined the first-year medical students' information needs in response to a clinical scenario. They found that the majority of students questions asked were related to diagnosis and treatment.[7] The observation showed students' questions were often asked because of a breakdown in the information flows. Although some questions were asked to elicit opinions or confirm order, many questions were asked because the students did not receive the needed information to make or implement a decision. Only 24% (n=84) of the questions noted during observations related to hospital policies, procedures, coordination and management issues. In emergency cases the answer to the organizational questions enabled the students to function more effectively and keep the unit running smoothly.[13] The low occurrence of organizational questions in the students indicates a few students had understood the importance of the interrelationship between clinical and organizational aspects of work in clinical units. This study indicated that 42% questions pertained to diagnosis thus students must have high need to these results because they help to the students to work out the diagnosis. The results revealed a significant correlation among need rate to radiography, laboratory and drug treatment results. In other words, those who had higher need to laboratory and radiography results also had higher need to drug treatment results. The opposite was true for those who had low need to laboratory and radiography results. This study showed that medicolegal issues were not important for the majority medical students, as only 10% (n=7) of students reported that they had high need to this information, since medicolegal affairs are subsequences that some of the patients who are referred to the ED, thus it is important that medical students increasingly consider to them.
Educational programs aiming to promote the medical students' awareness about organizational information and medicolegal issues must be provided in medical schools.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions and support of the directors in teaching hospitals, the emergency departments' supervisors and medical students.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None declared.
References
- 1.van der Vlugt TM, Harter PM. Teaching procedural skills to medical students: one institution's experience with an emergency proce-dures course. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:41–9. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.125613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.David SS, Selvaranjini S, Thomas M. Incorporation of emergency medicine in the undergraduate curriculum. Natl Med J India. 1997;10:80–1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Johnson GA, Pipas L, Newman-Palmer NB, Brown LH. The emergency medicine rotation: a unique experience for medical students. J Emerg Med. 2002;22:307–11. doi: 10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00497-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hockberger RS, Binder LS, Graber MA, Hoffman GL, Perina DG, Schneider SM, Sklar DP, Strauss RW, Viravec DR, Koenig WJ, Augustine JJ, Burdick WP, Henderson WV, Lawrence LL, Levy DB, McCall J, Parnell MA, Shoji KT. American College of Emergency Physicians Core Content Task Force II. The model of the clinical practice of emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:745–70. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.115495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Manthey DE, Coates WC, Ander DS, Ankel FK, Blumstein H, Christopher TA, Courtney JM, Hamilton GC, Kaiyala EK, Rodgers K, Schneir AB, Thomas SH. Task Force on National Fourth Year Medical Student Emergency Medicine Curriculum Guide. Report of the Task Force on National Fourth Year Medical Student Emergency Medicine Curriculum Guide. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shepherd S, Zun L, Mitchell J, Binder L, Emerman C, Green R, Honigman B, Jones J, LaMantia J, Mayer D, et al. A model preclinical, clinical, and graduate educational curriculum in emergency medicine for medical students and rotating residents. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19:1159–66. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81522-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cogdill KW, Moore ME. First-year medical students' information needs and resource selection: responses to a clinical scenario. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997;85:51–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Celenza A. Evolution of emergency medicine teaching for medical students. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18:219–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00862.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ling LJ, Bowles LT, Reynolds R, Kroot L, Roth P. Emergency medicine in the medical school curriculum. Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4:1070–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03682.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kelly AM, Ardagh MW. Does learning emergency medicine equip medical students for ward emergencies? Med Educ. 1994;28:524–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02730.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Celenza A, Jelinek GA, Jacobs I, Kruk C, Graydon R, Murray L. Implementation and evaluation of an undergraduate emergency medicine curriculum. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2001;13:98–103. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2001.00186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.deLahunta EA, Bazarian J. University and community hospital medical student emergency medicine clerkship experiences. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:343–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02717.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.James HE. The Best Form of Instruction for Medical Students to fit them to take their part in Case of National Emergency. Proc R Soc Med. 1921;14:29–35. doi: 10.1177/003591572101402303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
