Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
letter
. 2012 Jun 13;109(30):E2029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207795109

Reply to Kojo: Mechanisms of antioxidant-induced DNA damage

Jennifer T Fox a, Srilatha Sakamuru b, Ruili Huang b, Nedelina Teneva a, Steven O Simmons c, Menghang Xia b, Raymond R Tice d, Christopher P Austin b, Kyungjae Myung a,1
PMCID: PMC3409727

There are several different mechanisms by which antioxidants induce DNA damage in cultured cells. In a Letter to the Editor, Kojo (1) suggests that one of these mechanisms, the generation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) resulting from the exposure of antioxidants to high levels of oxygen in cell culture media, could be primarily responsible for the DNA damage and cell death observed in in vitro studies using resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein (2). Thus, the author questions whether the three antioxidants could act as genotoxins (and by extension, chemotherapeutic agents) in vivo where oxygen concentrations are low. Although this is a valid concern, there are two key pieces of evidence that argue against it. First, recognizing that resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein could be acting as prooxidants in our studies, we had measured the production of reactive oxygen species in cultured cells following treatment with these compounds at concentrations of 92 μM using the general oxidative stress indicator CM-H2DCF-DA (Invitrogen) and found no difference compared with treatment with DMSO alone. Second, other groups have shown that resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein can successfully reduce tumor growth in mice (35). Taken together, these data suggest that the production of H2O2 does not make a significant contribution to the phenotypes observed following resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein treatments. Rather, these compounds act through other mechanisms, which may involve the intercalation of DNA and/or the inhibition of topoisomerase, DNA polymerase, and ribonucleotide reductase.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Kojo S. Oxygen is the key factor associated with the difference between in vivo and in vitro effects of antioxidants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E2028. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205916109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fox JT, et al. High-throughput genotoxicity assay identifies antioxidants as inducers of DNA damage response and cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:5423–5428. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114278109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Constantinou AI, Krygier AE, Mehta RR. Genistein induces maturation of cultured human breast cancer cells and prevents tumor growth in nude mice. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68(Suppl):1426S–1430S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/68.6.1426S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Garvin S, Ollinger K, Dabrosin C. Resveratrol induces apoptosis and inhibits angiogenesis in human breast cancer xenografts in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2006;231(1):113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Miocinovic R, et al. In vivo and in vitro effect of baicalein on human prostate cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2005;26:241–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES