Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1985 Jan 25;13(2):473–484. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.2.473

Comparison of genomic fragment and clone sequences within a long interspersed repeated sequence of the mouse genome.

D L Vizard, J Yarsa
PMCID: PMC341009  PMID: 2987797

Abstract

The 393bp nucleotide sequence of a HindIII genomic fragment mapping within the major long interspersed repeated sequence family (MIF-1, Bam, L1) of mouse is reported and compared to clone sequences of the same region of this repeated sequence. The consensus of the clone sequences significantly differs from the genomic fragment sequence by additions and deletions that are inconsistent with the physical and biochemical properties of the genomic fragment. While alternative explanations could account for some of these differences, several aspects of the experimental results imply that cloning artifacts contribute to the discrepancies. Despite the differences between the clone and genomic fragment sequences, the biologically interesting features previously noted in clone sequences (promoter-like signals and an open reading frame) are conserved in the genomic fragment sequence.

Full text

PDF
473

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown S. D. A mouse dispersed repeat sequence showing remarkable similarities to the long terminal repeats of retroviruses. Gene. 1983 Jul;23(1):95–97. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90220-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown S. D., Piechaczyk M. Insertion sequences and tandem repetitions as sources of variation in a dispersed repeat family. J Mol Biol. 1983 Apr 5;165(2):249–256. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80256-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fanning T. G. Size and structure of the highly repetitive BAM HI element in mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Aug 11;11(15):5073–5091. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.15.5073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Geck P., Nász I. Concentrated, digestible DNA after hydroxylapatite chromatography with cetylpyridinium bromide precipitation. Anal Biochem. 1983 Dec;135(2):264–268. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90681-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kłysik J., Stirdivant S. M., Wells R. D. Left-handed DNA. Cloning, characterization, and instability of inserts containing different lengths of (dC-dG) in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1982 Sep 10;257(17):10152–10158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lund T., Grosveld F. G., Flavell R. A. Isolation of transforming DNA by cosmid rescue. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jan;79(2):520–524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.2.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Martin S. L., Voliva C. F., Burton F. H., Edgell M. H., Hutchison C. A., 3rd A large interspersed repeat found in mouse DNA contains a long open reading frame that evolves as if it encodes a protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(8):2308–2312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.8.2308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):499–560. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Meunier-Rotival M., Bernardi G. The Bam repeats of the mouse genome belong in several superfamilies the longest of which is over 9 kb in size. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Feb 10;12(3):1593–1608. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.3.1593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rogers J. A straight LINE story. Nature. 1983 Nov 10;306(5939):113–114. doi: 10.1038/306113a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rubin C. M., Schmid C. W. Pyrimidine-specific chemical reactions useful for DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Oct 24;8(20):4613–4619. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.20.4613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Singer M. F., Thayer R. E., Grimaldi G., Lerman M. I., Fanning T. G. Homology between the KpnI primate and BamH1 (M1F-1) rodent families of long interspersed repeated sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Aug 25;11(16):5739–5745. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.16.5739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith T. F., Waterman M. S., Sadler J. R. Statistical characterization of nucleic acid sequence functional domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Apr 11;11(7):2205–2220. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.7.2205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vizard D. L., Yarsa J. Long interspersed repeated sequences of the mouse genome. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Feb 24;781(1-2):143–152. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(84)90132-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES