Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1985 Mar 11;13(5):1443–1465. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.5.1443

The kinetic properties of cruciform extrusion are determined by DNA base-sequence.

D M Lilley
PMCID: PMC341088  PMID: 4000940

Abstract

The extrusion kinetics of two cruciforms derived from unrelated DNA sequences differ markedly. Kinetic barriers exist for both reactions, necessitating elevated temperatures before extrusion proceeds at measureable speeds, but the dependence upon temperature and ionic strength is quite different for the two sequences. One, the ColE1 inverted repeat, exhibits a remarkably great temperature dependence of reaction rate and is suppressed by moderate amounts of NaCl or MgCl2. In contrast, the other, a synthetic inverted repeat present in pIRbke8, shows more modest temperature dependence and has a requirement for the presence of salt, with optimal concentrations being 50 mM NaCl or 100 microM MgCl2. Under optimal conditions, cruciform extrusion rates are fast (t1/2 less than 60m) at 37 degrees C for both sequences at native superhelix densities. In 50 mM NaCl the pIRbke8 inverted repeat is characterised by an Arrhenius activation energy of 42.4 +/- 3.2 kcal mole -1. The differences in kinetic properties between the two sequences indicate that DNA base sequence is itself an important factor in determining cruciform kinetics, and possibly even in the selection of the mechanistic pathway.

Full text

PDF
1443

Images in this article

1448Image
on p.1448
1450Image
on p.1450
1451Image
on p.1451
1453Image
on p.1453
1454Image
on p.1454

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benham C. J. Stable cruciform formation at inverted repeat sequences in supercoiled DNA. Biopolymers. 1982 Mar;21(3):679–696. doi: 10.1002/bip.360210314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Courey A. J., Wang J. C. Cruciform formation in a negatively supercoiled DNA may be kinetically forbidden under physiological conditions. Cell. 1983 Jul;33(3):817–829. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dean F., Krasnow M. A., Otter R., Matzuk M. M., Spengler S. J., Cozzarelli N. R. Escherichia coli type-1 topoisomerases: identification, mechanism, and role in recombination. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 2):769–777. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dingwall C., Lomonossoff G. P., Laskey R. A. High sequence specificity of micrococcal nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jun 25;9(12):2659–2673. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.12.2659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gellert M., Mizuuchi K., O'Dea M. H., Ohmori H., Tomizawa J. DNA gyrase and DNA supercoiling. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 1):35–40. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gellert M., O'Dea M. H., Mizuuchi K. Slow cruciform transitions in palindromic DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(18):5545–5549. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gough G. W., Lilley D. M. DNA bending induced by cruciform formation. Nature. 1985 Jan 10;313(5998):154–156. doi: 10.1038/313154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Holbrook S. R., Sussman J. L., Warrant R. W., Church G. M., Kim S. H. RNA-ligant interactions. (I) Magnesium binding sites in yeast tRNAPhe. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977 Aug;4(8):2811–2820. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.8.2811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jack A., Ladner J. E., Rhodes D., Brown R. S., Klug A. A crystallographic study of metal-binding to yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA. J Mol Biol. 1977 Apr 15;111(3):315–328. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80054-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lilley D. M. DNA: sequence, structure and supercoiling. The twentieth Colworth medal lecture. Biochem Soc Trans. 1984 Apr;12(2):127–140. doi: 10.1042/bst0120127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lilley D. M. Hairpin-loop formation by inverted repeats in supercoiled DNA is a local and transmissible property. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Mar 25;9(6):1271–1289. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.6.1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lilley D. M., Hallam L. R. The interactions of enzyme and chemical probes with inverted repeats in supercoiled DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1983 Oct;1(1):169–182. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1983.10507433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lilley D. M., Hallam L. R. Thermodynamics of the ColE1 cruciform. Comparisons between probing and topological experiments using single topoisomers. J Mol Biol. 1984 Nov 25;180(1):179–200. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90436-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lilley D. M., Kemper B. Cruciform-resolvase interactions in supercoiled DNA. Cell. 1984 Feb;36(2):413–422. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90234-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lilley D. M., Markham A. F. Dynamics of cruciform extrusion in supercoiled DNA: use of a synthetic inverted repeat to study conformational populations. EMBO J. 1983;2(4):527–533. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01458.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lilley D. M., Palecek E. The supercoil-stabilised cruciform of ColE1 is hyper-reactive to osmium tetroxide. EMBO J. 1984 May;3(5):1187–1192. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01949.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lilley D. M. Structural perturbation in supercoiled DNA: hypersensitivity to modification by a single-strand-selective chemical reagent conferred by inverted repeat sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 May 25;11(10):3097–3112. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.10.3097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lilley D. M. The inverted repeat as a recognizable structural feature in supercoiled DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6468–6472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lyamichev V. I., Panyutin I. G., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Evidence of cruciform structures in superhelical DNA provided by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. FEBS Lett. 1983 Mar 21;153(2):298–302. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)80628-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lyamichev V., Panyutin I., Mirkin S. The absence of cruciform structures from pAO3 plasmid DNA in vivo. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1984 Oct;2(2):291–301. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1984.10507568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MARMUR J., DOTY P. Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J Mol Biol. 1962 Jul;5:109–118. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(62)80066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mizuuchi K., Mizuuchi M., Gellert M. Cruciform structures in palindromic DNA are favored by DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):229–243. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90325-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Panayotatos N., Wells R. D. Cruciform structures in supercoiled DNA. Nature. 1981 Feb 5;289(5797):466–470. doi: 10.1038/289466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Panyutin I. G., Lyamichev V. I., Lyubchenko YuL A sharp structural transition in pA03 plasmid DNA caused by increased superhelix density. FEBS Lett. 1982 Nov 8;148(2):297–301. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(82)80828-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Platt J. R. POSSIBLE SEPARATION OF INTERTWINED NUCLEIC ACID CHAINS BY TRANSFER-TWIST. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 Mar 15;41(3):181–183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.41.3.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Quigley G. J., Teeter M. M., Rich A. Structural analysis of spermine and magnesium ion binding to yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):64–68. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sinden R. R., Broyles S. S., Pettijohn D. E. Perfect palindromic lac operator DNA sequence exists as a stable cruciform structure in supercoiled DNA in vitro but not in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(7):1797–1801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.7.1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sinden R. R., Pettijohn D. E. Cruciform transitions in DNA. J Biol Chem. 1984 May 25;259(10):6593–6600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Singleton C. K. Effects of salts, temperature, and stem length on supercoil-induced formation of cruciforms. J Biol Chem. 1983 Jun 25;258(12):7661–7668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Singleton C. K., Wells R. D. Relationship between superhelical density and cruciform formation in plasmid pVH51. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jun 10;257(11):6292–6295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thompson B. J., Camien M. N., Warner R. C. Kinetics of branch migration in double-stranded DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jul;73(7):2299–2303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.7.2299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vologodskii A. V., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. Theoretical study of cruciform states in superhelical DNAs. FEBS Lett. 1982 Jul 5;143(2):257–260. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(82)80111-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES