Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: Biopolymers. 2011;96(1):103–110. doi: 10.1002/bip.21495

Table 2.

Opioid receptor affinities and efficacies of arodyn (1) and its N-terminal substituted analogs

X-NMePhe-Phe-R-Arg-Leu-Arg-Arg-D-Ala-Arg-Pro-Lys-NH2a

Peptide X R Ki ± SEM (nM) Ki ratio
(μ/κ)
AC
% control
@ 10 μMb
κ μ
1,
arodyn c
Acd Phe 10.0 ± 3.0 1750 ± 130 175 88 ± 8
2 e Ac Phe 4.56 ± 0.45 5056 ± 790 1100 86 ± 1
5 CH3OCO Phe 4.93 ± 0.15 1750 ± 100 355 74 ± 13
6 C6H5OCH2CO Phe 7.34 ± 1.37 1450 ± 190 198 98 ± 21
7 Gly Phe 28.9 ± 7.5 3070 ± 130 106 75 ± 8
8 Ac-Gly Phe 8.04 ± 3.14 >10,000 >1240 82 ± 17
3 Ac Trp 13.0 ± 2.6 2990 ± 700 230 105 ± 16
4 Acd Trp 16.1 ± 2.1 1180 ± 290 73 108 ± 5
9 CH3OCO Trp 9.52 ± 1.73 1280 ± 280 134 98 ± 13
10 C6H5OCH2CO Trp 13.3 ± 3.6 1250 ± 140 94 > 90
11 Gly Trp 15.4 ± 4.2 502 ± 145 33 90 ± 8
12 Ac-Gly Trp 21.9 ± 4.8 3760 ± 910 172 83 ± 7
a

The values are the mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments.

b

Relative to the full agonist Dyn A (1-13)NH2 (0% control, 100% inhibition).

c

From reference 28.

d

Phe instead of NMePhe in position 1.

e

From reference 30.