Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):406. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.406

Payment for coroners' postmortem examinations

Financial gain is pathetic...

Mary N Sheppard 1
PMCID: PMC341402  PMID: 14962892

Editor—Alcolado remembers as a house officer requesting a postmortem examination and being forced to make it a coroner's at the request of a pathologist.1

Firstly, let me make it clear that nobody can force someone to make a death into a coroner's post mortem if a cause of death is established. The doctor simply signs the death certificate to this effect. I know of no pathologist who can bend the ear of the coroner to this extent—rather the opposite. In my experience, cases are often not referred to the coroner that should be, such as postoperative deaths.

Secondly, the idea that the pathologist receives “a substantial payment” for each coroner's post mortem is laughable. I get £78 for each postmortem case I do, and this often involves four to six hours of work because I deal with complex postoperative deaths that usually require detailed examination and histology. The BMA is looking into the fees for coroners' autopsies and campaigning for a substantial increase. The pathologist who forced Alcolado to turn a case into a coroner's post mortem must have been desperate to waste his or her precious time for £78.

Finally, all coroners' cases in my hospital are actively used for teaching and audit purposes.

Competing interests: None declared.

References


Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES