Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Jul 14;68(Pt 8):m1069–m1070. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812031273

Aqua­{4,4′-dimeth­oxy-2,2′-[pyridine-2,3-diylbis(nitrilo­methanylyl­idene)]­diphenolato}copper(II)

Fatiha Benghanem a, Razika Benramdane a, Sofiane Bouacida b,*, Saida Keraghel a, Ali Ourari a
PMCID: PMC3414130  PMID: 22904737

Abstract

Mol­ecules of the title compound, [Cu(C21H17N3O4)(H2O)], lie across a crystallographic mirror plane. The CuII atom is five-coordinated in a distorted square-pyramidal environment by two phenolate O atoms and two imine N atoms of the tetra­dentate Schiff base anion in the basal plane and one water mol­ecule in the apical position. Because of symmetry, the pyridine N atom and the corresponding C atom at the 4-position of the pyridine ring are disordered. The crystal packing can be described as being composed of alternating layers stacked along [001]. Intra­molecular C—H⋯N and inter­molecular C—H⋯O and O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions, as well as C—H⋯π and π–π stacking inter­actions [shortest centroid–centroid distance = 3.799 (8) Å and inter­planar distance = 3.469 (2) Å] are observed.

Related literature  

For background, see Ourari et al. (2006); Ouari et al. (2010); Ourari, Ouari et al. (2008); Vyas & Shah (1963); Kataoka et al. (1979). For applications, see: Ourari, Baameur et al. (2008); Coche-Guerente et al. (1995). For the synthesis, see: Huo et al. (1999); Khedkar & Radhakrishnan (1997); Guo & Wong (1999).graphic file with name e-68-m1069-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • [Cu(C21H17N3O4)(H2O)]

  • M r = 456.93

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 23.162 (7) Å

  • b = 5.0997 (14) Å

  • c = 7.769 (2) Å

  • V = 917.7 (4) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.23 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.12 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • 10830 measured reflections

  • 3026 independent reflections

  • 2384 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.056

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032

  • wR(F 2) = 0.060

  • S = 0.89

  • 3026 reflections

  • 142 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.28 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.42 e Å−3

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 1361 Friedel pairs

  • Flack parameter: −0.015 (11)

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2005); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031273/wm2656sup1.cif

e-68-m1069-sup1.cif (22.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031273/wm2656Isup2.hkl

e-68-m1069-Isup2.hkl (145.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å).

Cu1—O1 1.9126 (14)
Cu1—N1 1.9561 (16)
Cu1—O3 2.416 (3)

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

Cg is the centroid of the C2–C7 benzene ring.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O3—H1W⋯O1i 0.84 (2) 2.19 (2) 2.933 (3) 146 (2)
C8—H8A⋯O2ii 0.93 2.57 3.330 (3) 139
C8—H8A⋯N2 0.93 2.49 2.844 (3) 103
C1—H1BCg iii 0.96 2.71 3.528 (4) 143

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Algerian Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique for financial support and Professor L. Ouahab (Laboratoire des Sciences Chimiques, Rennes 1, France) for helpful discussions.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title compound is one of the targeted materials to elaborate modified electrodes in order to use them in heterogeneous electrocatalysis. Therefore, this work is a continuation of investigations where 2,3-diaminophenol and 2,3-diaminopyridine were involved (Ourari et al., 2006; Ouari et al., 2010; Ourari, Ouari et al., 2008). The resulting ligands or complexes may be functionalized by etherification (Vyas & Shah, 1963) or quaternization (Kataoka et al., 1979) reactions using N-(3-bromopropyl)pyrrole. These materials are mainly applied in catalysis, electrocatalysis and sensors (Ourari, Baameur et al., 2008; Coche-Guerente et al., 1995). The synthesis of new salicylaldehyde derivatives containing electropolymerizable units can be considered as the main source of functionalized π-conjugated conducting polymers as those of poly(pyrrole), poly(thiophene) and poly(aniline) (Huo et al., 1999; Khedkar & Radhakrishnan, 1997; Guo & Wong, 1999). We report here the synthesis of the title compound, [Cu(C21H17N3O4)(H2O)], (I) and its crystal structure.

The molecular geometry of (I), and the atomic numbering used, is illustrated in Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit of (I) consists of one-half of the molecule, with the other half generated by a crystallographic mirror plane. Due to this symmetry the N2 and C10 atoms of the pyridine ring are equally disordered. The CuII atom is five-coordinate in a distorted square pyramidal geometry by the O atoms of two 5-methoxysalicylidene groups, the imine N atoms and one molecule of water in the apical position. The bond lengths of the coordination sphere range from 1.9126 (14) to 2.416 (3) Å for Cu—O distances and is 1.9561 (16) Å for the Cu—N distance. The crystal packing in (I) can be described by alterning layers along [001] (Fig. 2). There are one intramolecular C—H···N and two intermolecular C—H···O and O—H···O hydrogen bonding interactions in this packing (Fig. 3), which is further stabilized by C—H···π interactions (Table 2) and π–π stacking (shortest centroid-to-centroid distance 3.799 (8); interplanar distance of 3.469 (2) Å).

Experimental

All reagents were obtained from commercial sources and used without any further purification. 59 mg (0.3 mmol) of copper acetate monohydrate were dissolved in MeOH (10 ml). This solution was added dropwise to a stirred methanolic solution (5 ml) containing 113 mg (0.3 mmol) of the Schiff base ligand (N,N-bis(5-Methoxysalicyidene)-2,3-diaminopyridine). This mixture was stirred and refluxed for 90 minutes under nitrogen atmosphere to give a brown precipitate which was collected by filtration and washed successively with methanol and diethyl ether. After drying in vacuum in the presence of CaCl2, 93.5 mg of the copper complex were obtained (71%). Suitable crystals of green color were obtained from the filtrate after about twenty days. The microanalysis of (I) showed that one molecule of water is present (calc. / found %: C:55.20 /54.78; H:04.19 / 04.12; N: 09.20 / 09.17). Moreover, analysis by infrared spectrometry showing a spectrum with an absorption band at 1628 cm-1 attesting the presence of lattice water with its characteristic vibration band (H—O—H bending) accompanied by the stretching band at about 3500 cm-1 (Fig. 4).

Refinement

H atoms were localized in Fourier difference maps but introduced in calculated positions and treated as riding on their parent atom (C) with C—H = 0.93 Å (methine), 0.96 Å (methyl), and 0.93 Å (aromatic) with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(Caromatic and Cmethine) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(Cmethyl). The H1W proton of the water molecule was located in a difference Fourier map and refined isotropically with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O). Atoms N2 and C10 (with the attached proton) are disordered due to symmetry and were refined with a 0.5 occupancy each.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular geometry of (I) with the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radius. Only the contents of the asymmetric unit are numbered.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The crystal packing of (I) viewed along the a axis showing alterning zigzag layers.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The crystal packing of (I) viewed along the b axis showing intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions [C—H···O and O—H···O] as dashed lines.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The infrared spectrum of the title complex (I), attesting the presence of water.

Crystal data

[Cu(C21H17N3O4)(H2O)] F(000) = 470
Mr = 456.93 Dx = 1.654 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pmn21 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac -2 Cell parameters from 2879 reflections
a = 23.162 (7) Å θ = 2.8–24.8°
b = 5.0997 (14) Å µ = 1.23 mm1
c = 7.769 (2) Å T = 296 K
V = 917.7 (4) Å3 Prismatic, green
Z = 2 0.12 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 2384 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.056
Graphite monochromator θmax = 31.5°, θmin = 2.8°
φ and ω scans h = −33→32
10830 measured reflections k = −7→7
3026 independent reflections l = −11→11

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.060 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0215P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.89 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3026 reflections Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
142 parameters Δρmin = −0.42 e Å3
2 restraints Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 1361 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Flack parameter: −0.015 (11)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
Cu1 0 0.93278 (6) 0.79259 (5) 0.02848 (9)
N1 −0.05624 (7) 1.1402 (3) 0.9220 (2) 0.0272 (4)
O1 −0.05783 (6) 0.7137 (3) 0.69157 (18) 0.0362 (4)
O2 −0.29533 (6) 0.7498 (3) 0.72580 (17) 0.0380 (4)
O3 0 1.2442 (5) 0.5582 (4) 0.0721 (10)
H1W 0.0259 (10) 1.360 (4) 0.562 (4) 0.086*
C1 −0.32485 (8) 0.9589 (4) 0.8080 (5) 0.0432 (6)
H1A −0.3657 0.9321 0.7983 0.065*
H1B −0.3146 1.1216 0.754 0.065*
H1C −0.3142 0.9644 0.9274 0.065*
C2 −0.23570 (8) 0.7593 (4) 0.7284 (2) 0.0300 (4)
C3 −0.20813 (9) 0.5675 (4) 0.6291 (3) 0.0346 (5)
H3A −0.2302 0.4458 0.569 0.042*
C4 −0.14955 (9) 0.5563 (4) 0.6192 (3) 0.0342 (5)
H4A −0.1325 0.4267 0.552 0.041*
C5 −0.11349 (8) 0.7371 (4) 0.7087 (3) 0.0295 (4)
C6 −0.14200 (7) 0.9290 (3) 0.8104 (4) 0.0279 (5)
C7 −0.20319 (8) 0.9363 (4) 0.8174 (3) 0.0305 (5)
H7A −0.2214 1.0636 0.8837 0.037*
C8 −0.11190 (8) 1.1207 (4) 0.9096 (2) 0.0298 (4)
H8A −0.134 1.2414 0.9705 0.036*
C9 −0.03027 (8) 1.3274 (4) 1.0308 (3) 0.0274 (4)
C10 −0.06016 (8) 1.4952 (4) 1.1327 (3) 0.0356 (4) 0.5
H10 −0.1003 1.4959 1.1326 0.043* 0.5
N2 −0.06016 (8) 1.4952 (4) 1.1327 (3) 0.0356 (4) 0.5
C11 −0.03003 (9) 1.6617 (4) 1.2347 (3) 0.0388 (5)
H11 −0.0498 1.7778 1.3057 0.047*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu1 0.02368 (14) 0.02800 (15) 0.03375 (16) 0 0 −0.0046 (2)
N1 0.0238 (8) 0.0287 (9) 0.0291 (9) −0.0019 (6) 0.0017 (7) −0.0028 (7)
O1 0.0257 (7) 0.0348 (8) 0.0480 (9) 0.0006 (6) 0.0017 (7) −0.0130 (7)
O2 0.0247 (7) 0.0460 (8) 0.0433 (9) −0.0026 (6) −0.0047 (6) −0.0076 (7)
O3 0.118 (3) 0.0387 (15) 0.0594 (18) 0 0 −0.0015 (15)
C1 0.0270 (9) 0.0522 (12) 0.0504 (16) 0.0024 (8) −0.0035 (15) −0.0011 (14)
C2 0.0248 (10) 0.0335 (10) 0.0316 (10) −0.0030 (8) −0.0023 (8) 0.0045 (8)
C3 0.0356 (12) 0.0313 (11) 0.0370 (11) −0.0061 (9) −0.0064 (9) −0.0034 (11)
C4 0.0336 (11) 0.0279 (10) 0.0410 (12) −0.0004 (9) −0.0020 (9) −0.0058 (10)
C5 0.0265 (10) 0.0284 (10) 0.0337 (10) −0.0021 (8) −0.0013 (9) 0.0023 (9)
C6 0.0263 (8) 0.0291 (8) 0.0283 (13) −0.0029 (7) −0.0004 (11) −0.0010 (9)
C7 0.0292 (9) 0.0327 (9) 0.0296 (16) 0.0002 (8) 0.0014 (9) −0.0012 (9)
C8 0.0280 (10) 0.0315 (11) 0.0299 (11) −0.0002 (8) 0.0027 (8) −0.0016 (8)
C9 0.0268 (10) 0.0287 (10) 0.0266 (10) −0.0023 (9) −0.0003 (8) −0.0006 (9)
C10 0.0250 (9) 0.0442 (11) 0.0375 (11) 0.0022 (8) 0.0018 (8) −0.0065 (9)
N2 0.0250 (9) 0.0442 (11) 0.0375 (11) 0.0022 (8) 0.0018 (8) −0.0065 (9)
C11 0.0381 (11) 0.0387 (11) 0.0397 (13) 0.0083 (9) 0.0036 (8) −0.0074 (10)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Cu1—O1 1.9126 (14) C3—C4 1.360 (3)
Cu1—O1i 1.9126 (14) C3—H3A 0.93
Cu1—N1i 1.9561 (16) C4—C5 1.425 (3)
Cu1—N1 1.9561 (16) C4—H4A 0.93
Cu1—O3 2.416 (3) C5—C6 1.421 (3)
N1—C8 1.297 (2) C6—C7 1.419 (3)
N1—C9 1.410 (2) C6—C8 1.427 (3)
O1—C5 1.302 (2) C7—H7A 0.93
O2—C2 1.382 (2) C8—H8A 0.93
O2—C1 1.419 (3) C9—C10 1.356 (3)
O3—H1W 0.843 (16) C9—C9i 1.402 (4)
C1—H1A 0.96 C10—C11 1.355 (3)
C1—H1B 0.96 C10—H10 0.93
C1—H1C 0.96 C11—C11i 1.391 (4)
C2—C7 1.364 (3) C11—H11 0.93
C2—C3 1.400 (3)
O1—Cu1—O1i 88.90 (8) C4—C3—H3A 119.5
O1—Cu1—N1i 173.28 (7) C2—C3—H3A 119.5
O1i—Cu1—N1i 93.47 (6) C3—C4—C5 122.00 (19)
O1—Cu1—N1 93.47 (6) C3—C4—H4A 119
O1i—Cu1—N1 173.28 (7) C5—C4—H4A 119
N1i—Cu1—N1 83.50 (9) O1—C5—C6 125.46 (18)
O1—Cu1—O3 94.28 (7) O1—C5—C4 118.15 (18)
O1i—Cu1—O3 94.28 (7) C6—C5—C4 116.40 (17)
N1i—Cu1—O3 91.82 (7) C7—C6—C5 120.2 (2)
N1—Cu1—O3 91.82 (7) C7—C6—C8 116.7 (2)
C8—N1—C9 121.37 (16) C5—C6—C8 123.06 (16)
C8—N1—Cu1 125.63 (13) C2—C7—C6 121.0 (2)
C9—N1—Cu1 112.97 (13) C2—C7—H7A 119.5
C5—O1—Cu1 126.75 (12) C6—C7—H7A 119.5
C2—O2—C1 116.66 (16) N1—C8—C6 125.34 (18)
Cu1—O3—H1W 116 (2) N1—C8—H8A 117.3
O2—C1—H1A 109.5 C6—C8—H8A 117.3
O2—C1—H1B 109.5 C10—C9—C9i 120.71 (11)
H1A—C1—H1B 109.5 C10—C9—N1 124.03 (17)
O2—C1—H1C 109.5 C9i—C9—N1 115.26 (10)
H1A—C1—H1C 109.5 C11—C10—C9 118.30 (18)
H1B—C1—H1C 109.5 C11—C10—H10 120.9
C7—C2—O2 125.62 (19) C9—C10—H10 120.9
C7—C2—C3 119.34 (18) C10—C11—C11i 120.99 (12)
O2—C2—C3 115.05 (17) C10—C11—H11 119.5
C4—C3—C2 121.04 (18) C11i—C11—H11 119.5
O1—Cu1—N1—C8 −6.06 (17) C4—C5—C6—C7 −0.8 (3)
N1i—Cu1—N1—C8 179.97 (13) O1—C5—C6—C8 −0.9 (4)
O3—Cu1—N1—C8 88.35 (16) C4—C5—C6—C8 178.9 (2)
O1—Cu1—N1—C9 175.92 (12) O2—C2—C7—C6 −179.7 (2)
N1i—Cu1—N1—C9 1.95 (15) C3—C2—C7—C6 0.2 (3)
O3—Cu1—N1—C9 −89.67 (13) C5—C6—C7—C2 0.5 (4)
O1i—Cu1—O1—C5 177.79 (13) C8—C6—C7—C2 −179.27 (19)
N1—Cu1—O1—C5 4.09 (17) C9—N1—C8—C6 −176.49 (19)
O3—Cu1—O1—C5 −88.00 (16) Cu1—N1—C8—C6 5.6 (3)
C1—O2—C2—C7 7.1 (3) C7—C6—C8—N1 178.4 (2)
C1—O2—C2—C3 −172.8 (2) C5—C6—C8—N1 −1.4 (4)
C7—C2—C3—C4 −0.5 (3) C8—N1—C9—C10 1.6 (3)
O2—C2—C3—C4 179.41 (18) Cu1—N1—C9—C10 179.67 (16)
C2—C3—C4—C5 0.1 (3) C8—N1—C9—C9i −179.72 (13)
Cu1—O1—C5—C6 −1.6 (3) Cu1—N1—C9—C9i −1.61 (12)
Cu1—O1—C5—C4 178.60 (14) C9i—C9—C10—C11 −0.2 (2)
C3—C4—C5—O1 −179.63 (19) N1—C9—C10—C11 178.43 (17)
C3—C4—C5—C6 0.5 (3) C9—C10—C11—C11i 0.2 (2)
O1—C5—C6—C7 179.4 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) −x, y, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

Please define Cg

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O3—H1W···O1ii 0.84 (2) 2.19 (2) 2.933 (3) 146 (2)
C8—H8A···O2iii 0.93 2.57 3.330 (3) 139
C8—H8A···N2 0.93 2.49 2.844 (3) 103
C1—H1B···Cgiv 0.96 2.71 3.528 (4) 143

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x, y+1, z; (iii) −x−1/2, −y+2, z+1/2; (iv) −x+3/2, −y+2, z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: WM2656).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. & Berndt, M. (2001). DIAMOND Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2001). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Burla, M. C., Caliandro, R., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., De Caro, L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (2005). J. Appl. Cryst. 38, 381–388.
  4. Coche-Guerente, L., Cosnier, S., Innocent, C. & Mailly, P. (1995). Anal. Chim. Acta, 11, 161–169.
  5. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  6. Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.
  7. Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.
  8. Guo, P. & Wong, K. Y. (1999). Electrochem. Commun 1, 559–562.
  9. Huo, L. H., Cao, L. X., Wang, D. M., Cui, N. N., Zeng, G. F. & Xi, S. Q. (1999). Thin Solid Films, 350, 5–9.
  10. Kataoka, K., Ohki, N., Tsuruta, T., Doukai, N. & Inagaki, H. (1979). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 180, 65–77.
  11. Khedkar, S. P. & Radhakrishnan, S. (1997). Thin Solid Films, 303, 167–172.
  12. Ouari, K., Ourari, A. & Weiss, J. (2010). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 40, 831–836.
  13. Ourari, A., Baameur, L., Bouet, G. & Khan, M. A. (2008). Electrochem. Commun. 10, 1736–1739.
  14. Ourari, A., Ouari, K., Bouet, G. & Khan, M. A. (2008). J. Coord. Chem. 61, 3846–3859.
  15. Ourari, A., Ouari, K., Moumeni, W., Sibous, L., Bouet, G. & Khan, M. A. (2006). Transition Met. Chem. 31, 169–175.
  16. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Vyas, G. N. & Shah, N. M. (1963). Org. Synth. Coll. Vol. IV, p. 836.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031273/wm2656sup1.cif

e-68-m1069-sup1.cif (22.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031273/wm2656Isup2.hkl

e-68-m1069-Isup2.hkl (145.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES