P,P′-Diphenyl­ethyl­enediphosphinic acid dihydrate

Abstract

The title compound, C₁₄H₁₆O₄P₂·2H₂O, possesses a crystallographic inversion center where two –P(=O)(OH)(C₆H₅) groups are joined together via two –CH₂ groups. In the crystal, the acid molecules are linked by the water molecules via O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation of a two-dimensional network lying parallel to (101).

Related literature  

For background on related phosphine macrocycles, see: Caminade & Majoral (1994 ▶); Swor & Tyler (2011 ▶). For related syntheses, see: Lambert & Desreux (2000 ▶). For literature related to the use of phosphine complexes as N₂ scrubbers, see: Miller et al. (2002 ▶). For a related structure, see: Costantino et al. (2008 ▶). For literature related to the macrocycle effect, see: Melson (1979 ▶).

Experimental  

Crystal data  

• C₁₄H₁₆O₄P₂·2H₂O

• M _r = 346.24

• Monoclinic,

• a = 10.8280 (16) Å

• b = 6.2455 (10) Å

• c = 12.861 (2) Å

• β = 91.177 (2)°

• V = 869.5 (2) ų

• Z = 2

• Mo Kα radiation

• μ = 0.27 mm⁻¹

• T = 173 K

• 0.27 × 0.23 × 0.12 mm

Data collection  

• Bruker APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer

• Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000 ▶) T _min = 0.930, T _max = 0.968

• 9251 measured reflections

• 1888 independent reflections

• 1696 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

• R _int = 0.021

Refinement  

• R[F ² > 2σ(F ²)] = 0.039

• wR(F ²) = 0.109

• S = 1.09

• 1888 reflections

• 112 parameters

• H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

• Δρ_max = 0.41 e Å⁻³

• Δρ_min = −0.39 e Å⁻³

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
O2—H1O⋯O1S	1.06 (3)	1.40 (3)	2.459 (2)	173 (2)
O1S—H1S⋯O1i	0.87 (3)	1.82 (3)	2.687 (2)	178 (3)
O1S—H2S⋯O1ii	0.91 (4)	1.78 (4)	2.682 (2)	167 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In a recent publication, we showed that complexes of the type trans-Fe(P₂)₂Cl₂ (P₂ = a bidentate phosphine) will react with dinitrogen at high pressure to form trans-[Fe(P₂)₂(N₂)Cl]⁺ (Miller et al., 2002). This reaction is potentially useful as a way to scrub dinitrogen from natural gas contaminated with dinitrogen. Unfortunately, the phosphine ligands in these dinitrogen-scrubbing complexes slowly dissociate in aqueous solution, leading to degradation of the complexes. This prevents a practical pressure-swing process from being developed. One potential method to obtain complexes that are more robust is to use a phosphine macrocycle in place of the two bidentate ligands. (The "macrocycle effect" predicts that the binding constant for a macrocyclic ligand is orders of magnitude higher than the binding constant for two bidentate ligands (Melson, 1979)).

In addition to their usefulness in the N₂-scrubbing scheme described above, macrocyclic phosphine compounds are sought after in general as ligands for transition metal complexes because of their strong binding properties. However, the synthesis of phosphine macrocycles is a relatively underdeveloped area. One approach to macrocyclic phosphines is a template synthesis in which two secondary bidentate phosphines are coordinated to a common metal center and then covalently linked. The title molecule is both a precursor in the synthesis of the secondary bidentate phosphine 1,2-bis(phenylphosphino)ethane (MPPE, used in our laboratory for subsequent conversion into a macrocyclic phosphine ligand) and the oxidation product of MPPE. The X-ray structure of the title molecule recrystallized from ethanol has been reported (Costantino et al., 2008). As might be expected, the structure has an extensive hydrogen bonding network involving oxygen atoms (in the P=O and –OH groups) and H atoms (in the O—H groups). In contrast to the method used in this previous report, the structure reported here was recrystallized from water, which resulted in a different structure due to solvent water molecules.

The title compound has a centrosymmetrical structure where two –P(=O)(OH)(C₆H₅) groups are joined together via two –CH₂ groups. The terminal –OH group forms a very strong O(2)—H(1O)···O(1 s) H-bond with the solvent water molecule (Figure 1 and Table 1): the O(2)···(O1s), O(2)—H(10) and O(1 s)···H(10) distances are 2.459 (2), 1.06 (3) and 1.40 (3) Å, respectively and the O(2)—H(10)···O(1 s) angle is 173 (3)°.

Experimental

The title molecule was prepared serendipitously while attempting to synthesize a phosphine macrocycle using a Cu(I) template. 1,2-Bis(phenylphosphino)ethane (MPPE) (2 equiv.) was reacted with Cu(MeCN)₄PF₆ (1 equiv.) in acetonitrile to yield the corresponding Cu(MPPE)₂PF₆ complex. A similar complex (with trifluoromethanesulfonate counter anion) was reported to be relatively air-stable for several months (Lambert & Desreux, 2000). However, after several weeks of exposure to air, the Cu(MPPE)₂PF₆ complex decomposed and the phosphine ligands were fully oxidized, yielding the title compound. The crude oxidized phosphine was recrystallized from water, yielding crystals of the title molecule. Note that the title compound can be reduced back to the starting secondary bis-phosphine.

Refinement

The structure was solved using direct methods and refined with anisotropic thermal parameters for non-H atoms. H atoms in the main molecule were positioned geometrically and refined in a rigid group model, C—H = 1.2U_eq(C) for –CH₂ and –CH groups. H atoms in the terminal –OH group and in a solvent water molecule involved in intermolecular H-bonds were found from the residual density and refined with isotropic thermal parameters. There are some alongations of thermal parameters of the carbon atoms in the phenyl rings indicating that the phenyl rings in the structure are flexible.

Figures

Fig. 1.

A fragment of the crystal structure of P,P'-diphenylethylenediphosphinic acid with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids and the atom-numbering scheme. [Symmetry code (A): -x,-y,-z].

Crystal data

C14H16O4P2·2H2O	F(000) = 364
Mr = 346.24	Dx = 1.322 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/n	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn	Cell parameters from 4007 reflections
a = 10.8280 (16) Å	θ = 2.4–28.0°
b = 6.2455 (10) Å	µ = 0.27 mm−1
c = 12.861 (2) Å	T = 173 K
β = 91.177 (2)°	Block, colorless
V = 869.5 (2) Å3	0.27 × 0.23 × 0.12 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Bruker APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer	1888 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube	1696 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	Rint = 0.021
φ and ω scans	θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000)	h = −13→13
Tmin = 0.930, Tmax = 0.968	k = −7→7
9251 measured reflections	l = −16→16

Refinement

Refinement on F2	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.109	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.09	w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0533P)2 + 0.4488P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1888 reflections	(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
112 parameters	Δρmax = 0.41 e Å−3
0 restraints	Δρmin = −0.39 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are takeninto account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, anglesand torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are onlyused when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Ų)

	x	y	z	Uiso*/Ueq
P1	0.84023 (4)	0.19271 (7)	0.54585 (3)	0.02826 (16)
O1	0.77895 (12)	0.0487 (2)	0.62175 (10)	0.0395 (3)
O2	0.92075 (11)	0.3728 (2)	0.59502 (10)	0.0368 (3)
C1	0.94816 (15)	0.0518 (3)	0.46715 (13)	0.0318 (4)
H1B	0.9039	−0.0607	0.4270	0.038*
H1C	0.9847	0.1527	0.4170	0.038*
C2	0.72834 (16)	0.3127 (3)	0.45984 (14)	0.0356 (4)
C3	0.6126 (2)	0.2218 (6)	0.4494 (2)	0.0835 (10)
H3A	0.5926	0.0983	0.4887	0.100*
C4	0.5256 (3)	0.3103 (9)	0.3818 (3)	0.1219 (18)
H4A	0.4467	0.2452	0.3737	0.146*
C5	0.5523 (3)	0.4894 (7)	0.3271 (2)	0.0949 (12)
H5A	0.4910	0.5519	0.2827	0.114*
C6	0.6673 (3)	0.5807 (5)	0.3356 (2)	0.0762 (8)
H6A	0.6861	0.7047	0.2961	0.091*
C7	0.7566 (2)	0.4916 (4)	0.40205 (17)	0.0526 (5)
H7A	0.8366	0.5537	0.4076	0.063*
O1S	0.8284 (2)	0.6587 (3)	0.69946 (14)	0.0622 (5)
H1O	0.875 (2)	0.491 (4)	0.6401 (19)	0.062 (7)*
H1S	0.792 (3)	0.621 (5)	0.756 (3)	0.086 (10)*
H2S	0.801 (3)	0.783 (6)	0.670 (3)	0.092 (10)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Ų)

	U11	U22	U33	U12	U13	U23
P1	0.0299 (2)	0.0269 (3)	0.0281 (2)	0.00257 (16)	0.00540 (16)	0.00037 (15)
O1	0.0459 (7)	0.0341 (7)	0.0390 (7)	0.0028 (6)	0.0142 (6)	0.0059 (5)
O2	0.0347 (6)	0.0363 (7)	0.0395 (7)	0.0003 (5)	0.0030 (5)	−0.0077 (6)
C1	0.0347 (9)	0.0328 (9)	0.0280 (8)	0.0056 (7)	0.0050 (7)	−0.0023 (7)
C2	0.0308 (9)	0.0425 (10)	0.0337 (9)	0.0061 (7)	0.0022 (7)	0.0010 (7)
C3	0.0406 (12)	0.131 (3)	0.0778 (18)	−0.0223 (16)	−0.0133 (12)	0.0428 (19)
C4	0.0413 (14)	0.226 (5)	0.097 (2)	−0.011 (2)	−0.0203 (15)	0.066 (3)
C5	0.0592 (17)	0.166 (4)	0.0587 (16)	0.044 (2)	−0.0078 (13)	0.028 (2)
C6	0.103 (2)	0.0722 (18)	0.0535 (14)	0.0296 (17)	−0.0077 (14)	0.0196 (13)
C7	0.0597 (13)	0.0459 (12)	0.0518 (12)	0.0027 (10)	−0.0082 (10)	0.0102 (10)
O1S	0.1045 (15)	0.0336 (8)	0.0501 (9)	0.0127 (8)	0.0378 (10)	0.0049 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

P1—O1	1.4928 (13)	C3—H3A	0.9500
P1—O2	1.5500 (13)	C4—C5	1.355 (5)
P1—C2	1.7883 (18)	C4—H4A	0.9500
P1—C1	1.7927 (16)	C5—C6	1.373 (5)
O2—H1O	1.06 (3)	C5—H5A	0.9500
C1—C1i	1.534 (3)	C6—C7	1.393 (3)
C1—H1B	0.9900	C6—H6A	0.9500
C1—H1C	0.9900	C7—H7A	0.9500
C2—C7	1.380 (3)	O1S—H1O	1.40 (3)
C2—C3	1.380 (3)	O1S—H1S	0.87 (3)
C3—C4	1.383 (4)	O1S—H2S	0.91 (4)
O1—P1—O2	115.11 (8)	C2—C3—H3A	119.9
O1—P1—C2	110.63 (8)	C4—C3—H3A	119.9
O2—P1—C2	108.45 (8)	C5—C4—C3	120.4 (3)
O1—P1—C1	112.15 (8)	C5—C4—H4A	119.8
O2—P1—C1	102.64 (8)	C3—C4—H4A	119.8
C2—P1—C1	107.32 (8)	C4—C5—C6	120.3 (2)
P1—O2—H1O	117.6 (14)	C4—C5—H5A	119.9
C1i—C1—P1	111.97 (15)	C6—C5—H5A	119.9
C1i—C1—H1B	109.2	C5—C6—C7	120.0 (3)
P1—C1—H1B	109.2	C5—C6—H6A	120.0
C1i—C1—H1C	109.2	C7—C6—H6A	120.0
P1—C1—H1C	109.2	C2—C7—C6	119.7 (2)
H1B—C1—H1C	107.9	C2—C7—H7A	120.2
C7—C2—C3	119.5 (2)	C6—C7—H7A	120.2
C7—C2—P1	121.16 (15)	H1O—O1S—H1S	116 (2)
C3—C2—P1	119.37 (18)	H1O—O1S—H2S	122 (2)
C2—C3—C4	120.1 (3)	H1S—O1S—H2S	116 (3)
O1—P1—C1—C1i	−60.33 (19)	C7—C2—C3—C4	−0.3 (5)
O2—P1—C1—C1i	63.78 (18)	P1—C2—C3—C4	−178.9 (3)
C2—P1—C1—C1i	177.97 (16)	C2—C3—C4—C5	−1.5 (6)
O1—P1—C2—C7	162.61 (16)	C3—C4—C5—C6	2.2 (6)
O2—P1—C2—C7	35.49 (19)	C4—C5—C6—C7	−1.2 (5)
C1—P1—C2—C7	−74.74 (18)	C3—C2—C7—C6	1.3 (4)
O1—P1—C2—C3	−18.8 (3)	P1—C2—C7—C6	179.83 (19)
O2—P1—C2—C3	−146.0 (2)	C5—C6—C7—C2	−0.6 (4)
C1—P1—C2—C3	103.8 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
O2—H1O···O1S	1.06 (3)	1.40 (3)	2.459 (2)	173 (2)
O1S—H1S···O1ii	0.87 (3)	1.82 (3)	2.687 (2)	178 (3)
O1S—H2S···O1iii	0.91 (4)	1.78 (4)	2.682 (2)	167 (3)

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+3/2, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (iii) x, y+1, z.