Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Jul 18;68(Pt 8):o2484. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812031510

3-Bromo-2-hy­droxy­benzaldehyde

Jessica B Metlay a, Joseph M Tanski a,*
PMCID: PMC3414939  PMID: 22904926

Abstract

The mol­ecule of the title compound, C7H5BrO2, is almost planar (r.m.s. deviation from the plane of all the non-H atoms = 0.0271 Å) and displays intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonding between the phenol group and the aldehyde O atom. Packing is directed by weak inter­molecular C—H⋯Br inter­actions and π-stacking between nearly parallel mol­ecules [dihedral angle = 5.30 (6)° and centroid–centroid distance = 3.752 (1) Å].

Related literature  

For information on the synthesis of the title compound, see: Hansen & Skattebol (2005). For recent uses of the title compound in the synthesis of biologically active compounds, see: Velázquez et al. (2012); Wang et al. (2012); Zhang et al. (2012). For use of the title compound to prepare Schiff base ligands for metal coordination chemistry, see: Escudero-Adán et al. (2010); McGarrigle et al. (2004); Tzubery & Tshuva (2012). For related crystal structures, see: Balasubramani et al. (2011); Fan, You, Liu, Qian & Huang (2008); Fan, You, Qian, Liu & Huang (2008) Iwasaki et al. (1976); Kirchner et al. (2011); Tang et al. (2010).graphic file with name e-68-o2484-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C7H5BrO2

  • M r = 201.02

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.0282 (3) Å

  • b = 14.9715 (7) Å

  • c = 6.8472 (3) Å

  • β = 108.907 (1)°

  • V = 681.61 (5) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 5.96 mm−1

  • T = 125 K

  • 0.22 × 0.08 × 0.03 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker 2007) T min = 0.354, T max = 0.842

  • 10788 measured reflections

  • 2074 independent reflections

  • 1815 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.024

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.019

  • wR(F 2) = 0.048

  • S = 1.04

  • 2074 reflections

  • 95 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031510/bg2472sup1.cif

e-68-o2484-sup1.cif (13KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031510/bg2472Isup2.hkl

e-68-o2484-Isup2.hkl (102KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031510/bg2472Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond and C—H⋯Br interaction geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O1 0.79 (2) 1.90 (2) 2.6364 (16) 154 (2)
C4—H4⋯Br1i 0.95 3.05 3.798 (2) 137

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Vassar College. X-ray facilities were provided by the US National Science Foundation (grant No. 0521237 to JMT).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title compound, 3-bromo-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde, may be synthesized by reflux of 2-bromophenol with anhydrous magnesium dichloride, solid paraformaldehyde, and triethylamine in dry tetrahydrofuran (Hansen & Skattebol, 2005). Salicylaldehyde and its derivatives are commonly employed in the formation of Schiff bases for use as ligands in metal coordination chemistry. Schiff base complexes derived from 3-bromo-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde have been reported for several metals, including titanium (Tzubery & Tshuva, 2012), zinc (Escudero-Adán et al., 2010) and chromium (McGarrigle et al., 2004). 3-Bromo-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde is used as a synthetic reagent in the synthesis of biologically active compounds such as potential antiviral compounds (Velázquez et al., 2012), chiral aromatic spiroketals (Wang et al., 2012), and anticancer agents (Zhang et al., 2012).

The structure of the title compound (Fig. 1) shows that the molecule is planar, with a root mean square deviation from the plane of all atoms, excluding the aryl H atoms, of 0.0271 Å. The phenol is intramolecularly hydrogen bonded to the aldehyde group meta to it on the aryl ring, with an O···O distance of 2.6364 (16) Å and O—H···O angle of 154 (2)°. This intramolecular hydrogen bond is common to salicylaldehyde derivatives, having metrical parameters comparable to related structures (viz., 3,5-dibromo-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (Fan, You, Qian, Liu & Huang, 2008); 3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (Fan, You, Liu, Qian & Huang, 2008); 3-bromo-5-tert-butyl-2 -hydroxybenzaldehyde (Balasubramani et al., 2011); 2-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (Iwasaki et al., 1976); 2-hydroxy-3-nitrobenzaldehyde (Tang et al., 2010); hydroxybenzaldehyde (Kirchner et al., 2011). While O···O distances are rather similar in these structures (range: 2.597 (3)-2.713 (6)Å; Δ: 5%), O—H···O angles are slightly more uneven (range: 143 (2)-163 (2)Å, Δ: 13%) depending on the nature of intermolecular interactions involving the phenol and aldehyde substituents on neighbouring molecules.

Inspection of the molecular packing reveals that the crystal structure is organized by weak intermolecular C-H···Br interactions, with an H···Br distance of 3.05 Å and C—H···Br angle of 136.74°. There also exists an offset face-to-face π-stacking chain of molecues running parallel to the crystallographic c-axis, with an angle between the planes of the overlapping molecules of 5.30 (6)°. This π-stacking is characterized by a centroid-to-centroid distance of 3.752 (1) Å and centroid-to-plance distances of 3.346 (1) and 3.488 (1), resulting in a ring-offsets of 1.381 (2) and 1.697 (2) Å, respectively (Fig 2).

Experimental

Crystalline 3-bromo-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company, USA.

Refinement

All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms on carbon were included in calculated positions and refined using a riding model at C–H = 0.95 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2 × Ueq(C) of the aryl C-atoms. The hydrogen atom on oxygen was located in the difference map and refined freely. The extinction parameter (EXTI) refined to zero and was removed from the refinement.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A view of the title compound with the atom numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A view of the offset face-to-face π-stacking in the structure of the title compound (See text for details)

Crystal data

C7H5BrO2 F(000) = 392
Mr = 201.02 Dx = 1.959 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 6585 reflections
a = 7.0282 (3) Å θ = 2.7–30.5°
b = 14.9715 (7) Å µ = 5.96 mm1
c = 6.8472 (3) Å T = 125 K
β = 108.907 (1)° Plate, colourless
V = 681.61 (5) Å3 0.22 × 0.08 × 0.03 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 2074 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1815 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.024
φ and ω scans θmax = 30.5°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker 2007) h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.354, Tmax = 0.842 k = −21→21
10788 measured reflections l = −9→9

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.048 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0249P)2 + 0.1779P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2074 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
95 parameters Δρmax = 0.46 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.25 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Br1 0.11374 (2) 0.567091 (9) 0.25208 (2) 0.02342 (6)
O2 0.12613 (15) 0.76969 (8) 0.28306 (17) 0.0236 (2)
H2 0.144 (4) 0.8217 (17) 0.294 (4) 0.055 (8)*
C1 0.4646 (2) 0.88799 (9) 0.3840 (2) 0.0228 (3)
H1 0.5839 0.9229 0.4229 0.027*
O1 0.30259 (19) 0.92736 (7) 0.33528 (18) 0.0284 (2)
C6 0.3410 (2) 0.64329 (9) 0.3299 (2) 0.0170 (2)
C7 0.3132 (2) 0.73579 (9) 0.3323 (2) 0.0166 (2)
C3 0.6776 (2) 0.75351 (10) 0.4401 (2) 0.0202 (3)
H3 0.7925 0.7913 0.4781 0.024*
C5 0.5322 (2) 0.60728 (9) 0.3814 (2) 0.0192 (3)
H5 0.5480 0.5443 0.3776 0.023*
C2 0.4853 (2) 0.79087 (9) 0.38599 (19) 0.0177 (2)
C4 0.7016 (2) 0.66178 (10) 0.4385 (2) 0.0219 (3)
H4 0.8323 0.6363 0.4760 0.026*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Br1 0.01950 (8) 0.01875 (8) 0.03050 (9) −0.00399 (5) 0.00602 (6) −0.00323 (5)
O2 0.0177 (5) 0.0199 (5) 0.0302 (6) 0.0043 (4) 0.0037 (4) −0.0004 (4)
C1 0.0317 (8) 0.0177 (6) 0.0188 (6) −0.0035 (6) 0.0080 (6) 0.0005 (5)
O1 0.0383 (7) 0.0187 (5) 0.0275 (6) 0.0039 (4) 0.0095 (5) 0.0031 (4)
C6 0.0183 (6) 0.0165 (6) 0.0158 (6) −0.0017 (5) 0.0049 (5) −0.0020 (5)
C7 0.0168 (6) 0.0177 (6) 0.0144 (6) 0.0022 (5) 0.0040 (5) −0.0002 (5)
C3 0.0190 (7) 0.0241 (7) 0.0175 (6) −0.0041 (5) 0.0059 (5) −0.0014 (5)
C5 0.0222 (7) 0.0172 (6) 0.0181 (6) 0.0027 (5) 0.0062 (5) −0.0014 (5)
C2 0.0222 (6) 0.0169 (6) 0.0134 (6) −0.0018 (5) 0.0050 (5) −0.0005 (5)
C4 0.0174 (6) 0.0265 (7) 0.0208 (6) 0.0037 (5) 0.0048 (5) −0.0009 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Br1—C6 1.8933 (13) C7—C2 1.4107 (19)
O2—C7 1.3466 (16) C3—C4 1.384 (2)
O2—H2 0.79 (2) C3—C2 1.397 (2)
C1—O1 1.2284 (19) C3—H3 0.9500
C1—C2 1.4609 (19) C5—C4 1.391 (2)
C1—H1 0.9500 C5—H5 0.9500
C6—C5 1.3836 (19) C4—H4 0.9500
C6—C7 1.3993 (19)
C7—O2—H2 103.8 (18) C4—C3—H3 119.8
O1—C1—C2 124.12 (14) C2—C3—H3 119.8
O1—C1—H1 117.9 C6—C5—C4 121.02 (13)
C2—C1—H1 117.9 C6—C5—H5 119.5
C5—C6—C7 120.67 (13) C4—C5—H5 119.5
C5—C6—Br1 119.87 (10) C3—C2—C7 120.60 (13)
C7—C6—Br1 119.45 (10) C3—C2—C1 119.08 (13)
O2—C7—C6 119.90 (12) C7—C2—C1 120.32 (13)
O2—C7—C2 122.02 (12) C3—C4—C5 119.28 (13)
C6—C7—C2 118.08 (12) C3—C4—H4 120.4
C4—C3—C2 120.32 (13) C5—C4—H4 120.4
C5—C6—C7—O2 −179.59 (12) O2—C7—C2—C3 178.81 (12)
Br1—C6—C7—O2 1.18 (17) C6—C7—C2—C3 −1.59 (19)
C5—C6—C7—C2 0.79 (19) O2—C7—C2—C1 −1.71 (19)
Br1—C6—C7—C2 −178.43 (9) C6—C7—C2—C1 177.89 (12)
C7—C6—C5—C4 0.6 (2) O1—C1—C2—C3 178.64 (13)
Br1—C6—C5—C4 179.81 (11) O1—C1—C2—C7 −0.9 (2)
C4—C3—C2—C7 1.0 (2) C2—C3—C4—C5 0.4 (2)
C4—C3—C2—C1 −178.47 (13) C6—C5—C4—C3 −1.2 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O2—H2···O1 0.79 (2) 1.90 (2) 2.6364 (16) 154 (2)
C4—H4···Br1i 0.95 3.05 3.798 (2) 137

Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BG2472).

References

  1. Balasubramani, V., Vinuchakkaravarthy, T., Gopi, S., Narasimhan, S. & Velmurugan, D. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o3375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Bruker (2007). SAINT, SADABS and APEX2 Bruxer AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  4. Escudero-Adán, E. C., Belmonte, M. M., Benet-Buchholz, J. & Kleij, A. W. (2010). Org. Lett. 12, 4592–4595. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Fan, Y., You, W., Liu, J.-L., Qian, H.-F. & Huang, W. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Fan, Y., You, W., Qian, H.-F., Liu, J.-L. & Huang, W. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Hansen, T. V. & Skattebol, L. (2005). Org. Synth. 82, 64–68.
  8. Iwasaki, F., Tanaka, I. & Aihara, A. (1976). Acta Cryst. B32, 1264–1266.
  9. Kirchner, M. T., Bläser, D., Boese, R., Thakur, T. S. & Desiraju, G. R. (2011). Acta Cryst. C67, o387–o390. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. McGarrigle, E. M., Murphy, D. M. & Gilheany, D. G. (2004). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 15, 1343–1354.
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Tang, B., Chen, G., Song, X., Cen, C. & Han, C. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Tzubery, A. & Tshuva, E. Y. (2012). Inorg. Chem. 51, 1796–1804. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Velázquez, F., Venkatraman, S., Lesburg, C. A., Duca, J., Rosenblum, S. B., Kozlowski, R. A. & Njoroge, F. G. (2012). Org. Lett. 14, 556–559. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, X., Han, Z., Wang, Z. & Ding, K. (2012). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 936–940. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, H., Liu, J.-J., Sun, J., Yang, X.-H., Zhao, T.-T., Lu, X., Gong, H.-B. & Zhu, H.-L. (2012). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 20, 3212–3218. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031510/bg2472sup1.cif

e-68-o2484-sup1.cif (13KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031510/bg2472Isup2.hkl

e-68-o2484-Isup2.hkl (102KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812031510/bg2472Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES