Abstract
The complete and assembled genome sequences were determined for six strains of the alphaproteobacterial genus Methylobacterium, chosen for their key adaptations to different plant-associated niches and environmental constraints.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Genomic and metagenomic investigations have highlighted the prevalent role of methylotrophic microorganisms in a variety of marine, freshwater, and terrestrial environments (3–4, 6). These data have propelled new understanding of the molecular intricacies of microbial methylotrophic metabolism (1) and have sparked continued interest in their potential for biotechnological applications (15). In this work, the assembled complete genome sequences of six strains of the alphaproteobacterial genus Methylobacterium were determined. The selected strains were chosen for key characteristics, in terms of ecology, physiology, and metabolism (Table 1), in order to investigate how such adaptive features are reflected at the level of genome composition and architecture.
Table 1.
Organism | Key characteristic(s) | Genome analysis |
GenBank accession no. | Reference | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Size (Mb) | % GC | No. of rrn operons | No. of tRNAs | No. of CDSa | ||||
M. extorquens strain PA1 | Arabidopsis thaliana epiphyte | 5.471 | 68.2 | 5 | 58 | 5,410 | NC_010172 | 11 |
M. extorquens strain CM4 | Chloromethane degrader | 5.778 | 68.2 | 5 | 61 | 3,112 | NC_011757 | 13 |
0.380 | 66.3 | 388 | NC_011758 | |||||
0.023 | 63.9 | 44 | NC_011760 | |||||
M. extorquens strain BJ001b | Populus deltoides x nigra DN34 endophyte | 5.800 | 69.4 | 5 | 58 | 6,017 | NC_010725 | 17 |
0.025 | 64.9 | 30 | NC_010727 | |||||
0.023 | 66.8 | 31 | NC_010721 | |||||
M. radiotolerans strain JCM 2831 | Radioresistant strain | 6.078 | 71.5 | 4 | 56 | 6,325 | NC_010505 | 9 |
0.586 | 69.6 | 2 | 1 | 650 | NC_010510 | |||
0.047 | 62.5 | 66 | NC_010509 | |||||
0.043 | 63.2 | 1 | 75 | NC_010514 | ||||
0.038 | 63.7 | 1 | 60 | NC_010517 | ||||
0.036 | 62.0 | 64 | NC_010518 | |||||
0.028 | 61.0 | 1 | 45 | NC_010502 | ||||
0.022 | 61.1 | 38 | NC_010504 | |||||
0.021 | 65.1 | 33 | NC_010507 | |||||
Methylobacterium sp. strain 4-46 | Lotononis bainesi nodulating, photosynthetic | 7.659 | 71.6 | 6 | 63 | 8,337 | NC_010511 | 7 |
0.058 | 65.1 | 108 | NC_010373 | |||||
0.020 | 59.2 | 34 | NC_010374 | |||||
M. nodulans strain ORS 2060 | Nonpigmented, nitrogen fixing, Crotalaria nodulating | 7.772 | 68.9 | 7 | 71 | 8,879 | NC_011894 | 10 |
0.488 | 65.9 | 2 | 630 | NC_011892 | ||||
0.458 | 65.7 | 609 | NC_011887 | |||||
0.040 | 64.2 | 84 | NC_011893 | |||||
0.038 | 61.6 | 66 | NC_011895 | |||||
0.020 | 61.4 | 30 | NC_011888 | |||||
0.013 | 60.5 | 16 | NC_011889 | |||||
0.010 | 67.2 | 14 | NC_011890 |
Number of annotated protein-coding sequences in MicroScope (16).
This strain, originally reported as M. populi strain BJ001 (17), was assigned to the species M. extorquens based on 16S rRNA gene identity (99.3%) and overall genome similarity with the four other sequenced M. extorquens strains (∼80% identity over 75% of its genome sequence) (also see reference 18).
Genomes were sequenced at the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using combinations of small to medium DNA libraries (3, 6, and 8 kb), as well as fosmid libraries (35 and 40 kb), with Sanger sequencing (7.3 to 9.6× coverage) completed with 454 pyrosequencing (20× coverage). All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/protocols/prots_production.html. Draft assemblies and quality assessment were obtained using the Phred/Phrap/Consed software package. Possible misassemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher (8), PCR amplification, and transposon bombing of bridging clones (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walking, and PCR amplification. A final assembly (7.5 to 10.5× coverage) was obtained for all 6 genomes (Table 1), and automatic annotation was performed using the JGI-Oak Ridge National Laboratory annotation pipeline (12). Additional automatic and manual sequence annotations, as well as comparative genome analysis, were performed using the MicroScope platform at Genoscope (16).
The six Methylobacterium strains show significant variation in chromosome size and plasmid content (Table 1), and each possesses several conserved gene clusters known to be involved in methylotrophy in Methylobacterium (2, 18). Five of the strains possess conserved clusters of genes associated with photosynthesis, including genes encoding the light-harvesting complex and the reaction center, and genes involved in biosynthesis of bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoids. Further analyses of these six genomes will include comparisons to the two Methylobacterium genomes already reported (18), i.e., M. extorquens AM1, a major model strain in studies of methylotrophy (2) and genome evolution (5), and the dichloromethane-degrading strain M. extorquens DM4 (14). This will define both core- and strain-specific features of Methylobacterium strains and provide new insights into the metabolic flexibility of these facultative methylotrophs and into the modes of bacterial adaptation to specific ecological niches.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
GenBank accession numbers for all the chromosomes and plasmids sequenced in this study are shown in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research resulted from an approved proposal (Marx_0165_051130) evaluated during the DOE-CSP-05 program supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science. The team of C.J.M. was also supported by an NSF grant (IOB-0612591), and the team of S.V. was also supported by a mobility grant from CNRS (USA mobility program). The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute was supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231.
We are grateful to the JGI personnel who participated in the sequencing, assembly, and automated annotation processes.
REFERENCES
- 1. Anthony C. 2011. How half a century of research was required to understand bacterial growth on C1 and C2 compounds; the story of the serine cycle and the ethylmalonyl-CoA pathway. Science Prog. 94:109–137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Chistoserdova L. 2011. Modularity of methylotrophy, revisited. Environ. Microbiol. 13:2603–2622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chistoserdova L. 2010. Recent progress and new challenges in metagenomics for biotechnology. Biotechnol. Lett. 32:1351–1359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chistoserdova L, Kalyuzhnaya MG, Lidstrom ME. 2009. The expanding world of methylotrophic metabolism. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63:477–499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chou H-H, Chiu H-C, Delaney NF, Segre D, Marx CJ. 2011. Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptation. Science 332:1190–1192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Delmotte N, et al. 2009. Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:16428–16433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Fleischman D, Kramer DM. 1998. Photosynthetic rhizobia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1364:17–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Han C, Chain P. 2006. Finishing repetitive regions automatically with Dupfinisher, p 141–146 In Arabnia HR, Valafar H. (ed), Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology CSREA Press, Las Vegas, NV [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ito H, Iizuka H. 1971. Part XIII: taxonomic studies on a radio-resistant Pseudomonas. Agric. Biol. Chem. 35:1566–1571 [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jourand P, et al. 2004. Methylobacterium nodulans sp. nov., for a group of aerobic, facultatively methylotrophic, legume root-nodule-forming and nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:2269–2273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Knief C, Frances L, Vorholt JA. 2010. Competitiveness of diverse Methylobacterium strains in the phyllosphere of Arabidopsis thaliana and identification of representative models, including M. extorquens PA1. Microb. Ecol. 60:440–452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mavromatis K, et al. 2009. The DOE-JGI standard operating procedure for the annotations of microbial genomes. Stand. Genomic Sci. 1:63–67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. McDonald IR, Doronina NV, Trotsenko YA, McAnulla C, Murrell JC. 2001. Hyphomicrobium chloromethanicum sp. nov. and Methylobacterium chloromethanicum sp. nov., chloromethane-utilizing bacteria isolated from a polluted environment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51:119–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Muller EEL, et al. 2011. Functional genomics of dichloromethane utilization in Methylobacterium extorquens DM4. Environ. Microbiol. 13:2518–2535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Schrader J, et al. 2009. Methanol-based industrial biotechnology: current status and future perspectives of methylotrophic bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 27:107–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Vallenet D, et al. 2009. MicroScope: a platform for microbial genome annotation and comparative genomics. Database. doi:10.1093/database/bap021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Van Aken B, Peres CM, Doty SL, Yoon JM, Schnoor JL. 2004. Methylobacterium populi sp. nov., a novel aerobic, pink-pigmented, facultatively methylotrophic, methane-utilizing bacterium isolated from poplar trees (Populus deltoides x nigra DN34). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:1191–1196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Vuilleumier S, et al. 2009. Methylobacterium genome sequences: a reference blueprint to investigate microbial metabolism of C1 compounds from natural and industrial sources. PLoS One 4:e5584 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]