Skip to main content
The Texas Heart Institute Journal logoLink to The Texas Heart Institute Journal
. 1984 Sep;11(3):268–274.

Advantages of List-Mode Data Acquisition in Gated Blood Pool Studies

E Gordon Depuey 1,2, John J Almasi 1,2, Robert L Eisner 1,2, Paul H Murphy 1,2, Robert E Sonnemaker 1,2, John A Burdine 1,2
PMCID: PMC341723  PMID: 15227060

Abstract

Because of physiologic R-R interval variability and arrhythmia, frame-mode acquisition of gated images may produce erroneous left ventricular volume curves, particularly in the diastolic filling phase. Eighteen patients in sinus rhythm underwent gated imaging in which both frame-mode and list-mode acquisitions were used. The systolic portions of the volume curves were similar in both studies, and the ejection fractions correlated well (R = 0.97). “Dropout” of data in the late diastolic phase, noted in 15 patients in whom frame mode was used, was not present in list mode, in which the atrial kick was clearly delineated. In additional patients with various arrhythmias, separate volume curves were obtained with list mode for premature, post-premature, and sinus beats. In patients with atrial fibrillation, a prominent peak mid-range on the R-R histogram was selected, and a complete volume curve was obtained. It was concluded that list-mode acquisition provided improved volume curves, with particular applicability in arrhythmic patients.

Full text

PDF
268

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bacharach S. L., Green M. V., Borer J. S., Ostrow H. G., Bonow R. O., Farkas S. P., Johnston G. S. Beat-by-beat validation of ECG gating. J Nucl Med. 1980 Apr;21(4):307–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brash H. M., Wraith P. K., Hannan W. J., Dewhurst N. G., Muir A. L. The influence of ectopic heart beats in gated ventricular blood-pool studies. J Nucl Med. 1980 Apr;21(4):391–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dyke S. H., Cohn P. F., Gorlin R., Sonnenblick E. H. Detection of residual myocardial function in coronary artery disease using post-extra systolic potentiation. Circulation. 1974 Oct;50(4):694–699. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.50.4.694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamby R. I., Aintablian A., Wisoff G., Hartstein M. L. Response of the left ventricle in coronary artery disease to postextrasystolic potentiation. Circulation. 1975 Mar;51(3):428–435. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.3.428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Murphy P. H. ECG gating: does it adequately monitor venticular contraction? J Nucl Med. 1980 Apr;21(4):399–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Popio K. A., Gorlin R., Bechtel D., Levine J. A. Postextrasystolic potentiation as a predictor of potential myocardial viability: preoperative analyses compared with studies after coronary bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Jun;39(7):944–953. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(77)80206-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Texas Heart Institute Journal are provided here courtesy of Texas Heart Institute

RESOURCES