Abstract
Background
The complete genome of Rana grylio virus (RGV) was sequenced and analyzed recently, which revealed that RGV 50L had homologues in many iridoviruses with different identities; however, the characteristics and functions of 50L have not been studied yet.
Methodology/Principal Findings
We cloned and characterized RGV50L, and revealed 50L functions in virus assembly and gene regulation. 50L encoded a 499-amino acid structural protein of about 85 kDa in molecular weight and contained a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and a helix- extension-helix motif. Drug inhibition assay demonstrated that 50L was an immediate-early (IE) gene. Immuno-fluorescence assay revealed that 50L appeared early and persisted in RGV-infected cells following two distribution patterns. One pattern was that 50L exhibited a cytoplasm-nucleus- viromatrix distribution pattern, and mutagenesis of the NLS motif revealed that localization of 50L in the nucleus was NLS-dependent; the other was that 50L co-localized with viral matrix which plays important roles in virus assembly and the life circle of viruses.
Conclusions/Significance
RGV 50L is a novel iridovirus IE gene encoded structural protein which plays important roles in virus assembly.
Introduction
Rana grylio virus (RGV) is a pathogenic agent that causes lethal disease in cultured pig frogs (Rana grylio), which was the first iridovirus isolated in China [1], [2]. Previous studies have revealed that RGV is a large, icosahedral, dsDNA virus, belonging to the family Iridoviridae and closely related to frog virus 3, the type species of the genus Ranavirus [3]–[5]. At least 16 structural proteins were detected [2]. Cellular changes and some viral proteins involved in RGV infection and replication have been identified and characterized, such as 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD), deoxyuridine triphosphatase (dUTPase), thymidine kinase (TK) and a gene belonging to the essential for respiration and viability family (ERV1) [6]–[11]. In application, a recombinant RGV containing EGFP gene (ΔTK-RGV) was constructed, which could be easily detected by fluorescent microscopy [12]. Recently, the complete genome of RGV has been sequenced and analyzed, and the results confirmed that RGV belongs to the genus Ranavirus [13].
Iridoviruses, belonging to Nucleo-Cytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDVs), contain circularly permutated and terminally redundant double-stranded DNA genomes ranging from 103 to 212 kbp in length and replicate in both the nucleus and cytoplasm of infected cells, and could infect varieties of invertebrates and poikilothermic vertebrates [14]. Based on the Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Virus (ICTV), the family Iridoviridae is currently classified into five genera: Ranavirus, Lymphocystivirus, Megalocytivirus, Iridovirus and Chloriridovirus [15]. Members of the genus Ranavirus could cause systemic disease or die-offs in a wide range of economically and ecologically important vertebrates including fish, amphibians and reptiles, which have become serious problems in modern aquaculture, fish farming and wildlife conservation, leading to serious economic losses [16]–[18].
Virion assembly of iridoviruses takes place in electron-lucent viral matrix (virus factory) which contains virus particles at different stages of assembly, including empty capsids, capsids with partial cores and the matured nucleocapsids [3], [5]. Little is known about the precise process of virion morphogenesis in iridoviruses. Up to date, only two structure proteins of iridoviruses have been identified to be linked to virion assembly, including the major capsid protein (MCP) (RGV ORF 97R) and a putative myristoylated membrane protein (ORF 53R of RGV and FV3) [19]. MCP of iridovirus is an internal lipid membrane, the sequence of which is highly conserved within all members of the family [20]. The MCP comprises 40% of the total virion protein content and contains the viral genome, constituting the inner core of iridovirus particles [21], [22]. Knock down studies using artificial microRNAs and asMOs demonstrated that 53R was indispensable for virion assembly, and in vitro studies also showed that 53R was associated with virus factories and the virion membrane [23]–[25].
Analysis of the RGV genome showed that it contains 106 ORFs encoding peptides ranging from 41 to 1294 amino acids in length, and the ORF 50L, containing a putative SAP motif [named after SAF-A/B, Acinus and PIAS (protein inhibitor of activated STAT)], shares high identity with soft-shelled turtle iridovirus (STIV) while relatively low with FV3 [13]. The homolog of RGV 50L in Singapore grouper iridovirus (SGIV), SGIV 25L, has been detected by LC-MALDI workflow [26], however, the characteristics and functions of the gene have not been studied yet.
To understand the role of RGV 50L in iridovirus propagation, we cloned RGV 50L gene, prepared anti-RGV 50L serum, characterized its expression pattern and detected its molecular mass. Then, cycloheximide (CHX) and cytosine arabinofuranoside (Ara C) were used to identify the expression pattern of RGV 50L. Subsequently, EGFP-50L and NLS motif mutant EGFP-50L-ΔNLS were constructed to identify subcellular locations of the fusion protein. Moreover, ΔTK-RGV and anti-RGV 50L serum were used to detect the localization of 50L protein during RGV infection. Furthermore, in order to know the effect of 50L on other RGV genes, real-time quantitative PCR of MCP were determined in 50L-pcDNA3.1 stably transfected cells.
Results
Sequence Analysis of RGV 50L
The complete ORF of RGV (GenBank Accession No. JQ654586) 50L, a fragment of 1500 bp in length, was amplified from RGV genomic DNA using specific primers. Sequence analysis revealed that RGV 50L encodes 499 amino acids and contains several conserved features, including a lysine-rich nuclear localization signal (NLS), a helix-extension-helix motif (putative SAP domain) and a continuous QQEKQQPEE AVVE tri-repeated sequence (Fig. 1). 50L had homologues in many iridoviruses, showing high identities (82∼100%) with STIV 52L, common midwife toad ranavirus (CMTV) 59R, epizootic hematopoietic necrosis virus (EHNV) 83L, and Ambystoma tigrinum virus (ATV) 79L, while relatively low (less than 50%) with FV3 49L, grouper iridovirus (GIV) 9L, Singapore grouper iridovirus (SGIV) 25L, lymphocystis disease virus (LCDV-1) 59L and lymphocystis disease virus-China (LCDV-C) 62R (Table 1).
Figure 1. Multiple sequence alignment of 50L homologues in iridoviruses.
RGV, Rana grylio virus; STIV, soft-shelled turtle iridovirus; CMTV, common midwife toad ranavirus; EHNV, epizootic hematopoietic necrosis virus; ATV, Ambystoma tigrinum virus; TFV, tiger frog virus; FV3, frog virus 3; RRV, Regina ranavirus; GIV, grouper iridovirus; SGIV, Singapore grouper iridovirus; LCDV-1, lymphocystis disease virus 1; LCDV-C, lymphocystis disease virus-China. The completely conserved amino acid residues are indicated by a black background, while the grey background are partially conserved residues with greater than 80% identity, and key amino acid residues in SAP domain are indicated by colorful backgrounds. Conserved motifs are shown by rectangles and labeled as Repeated Sequence, NLS motif and SAP domain above the alignment, respectively. Gaps (dashes) were introduced to maximize the alignment.
Table 1. Comparisons of RGV 50L with its homologues in other iridoviruses.
| Virus | Accession No. | ORFa | Length (aa)b | MWc (kDa) | Id%d |
| RGV | JQ654586 | 50L | 499 | 55.5 | 100 |
| STIV | EU627010 | 52L | 499 | 55.5 | 100 |
| CMTV | JQ231222 | 59R | 503 | 55.8 | 89 |
| EHNV | FJ433873 | 83L | 541 | 60.7 | 85 |
| ATV | AY150217 | 79L | 513 | 60.0 | 82 |
| TFV* | AF389451 | 51L, 52L | 440 | 49.5 | 69 |
| FV3 | AY548484 | 49L | 249 | 27.5 | 49 |
| RRV | – | – | 193 | 21.4 | 33 |
| GIV | AY666015 | 9L | 505 | 55.8 | 23 |
| SGIV | AY521625 | 25L | 510 | 56.5 | 23 |
| LCDV-1 | L63545 | 59L | 200 | 22.2 | 12 |
| LCDV-C | AY380826 | 62R | 197 | 22.3 | 12 |
Prokaryotic and Temporal Expression of RGV 50L
To prepare anti-RGV 50L serum, pET32a-50L was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) and expression of the 50L-His fusion protein was induced. As shown in Fig. 2A, the induced fusion protein was approximately 75 kDa (Lane 2–4), whereas no protein band was found at the same position of the non-induced 50L-pro/BL21 (Lane 1). The fusion protein was purified using Ni2+-NTA affinity chromatography (Lane 5), and used to prepare anti-RGV 50L antibody in mice.
Figure 2. Prokaryotic and temporal expression of RGV 50L.
(A) SDS-PAGE of prokaryotic expressed and purified fusion protein 50L-His. Lane 1: pET32a/50L, non-induced; lane 2: pET32a/50L, induced; lane 3: precipitate of induced pET32a/50L after ultrasonication; lane 4: supernatant of induced pET32a/50L after ultrasonication; lane 5: the purified protein by Ni2+-NTA affinity chromatography. (B) Real-time quantitative PCR detection of RGV transcriptional levels in RGV-infected EPC cells. EPC cells were infected by RGV at an M.O.I. of 1. 50L mRNA levels was measured by real-time PCR analysis at different time (0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 h) post-infection (p.i.), mock infected cells was used as negative control. Transcriptional level of RGV 50L mRNA was expressed by the common logarithm of the relative quantity (Log ΔRQ). All the values were normalized to the β-actin gene. The values represent averages of three independent experiments, with the range indicated (±SD). (C) Western blot analysis of temporal expression pattern of 50L protein. Proteins from the experiment described in (B) were analyzed by western blot analysis, and β-actin was detected under the same conditions as an internal control. Protein markers were indicated (lane M).
The temporal expression pattern of RGV 50L was characterized by real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blot analysis. Transcriptional level of RGV 50L was expressed by the common logarithm of the relative quantity (Log ΔRQ). As shown in Fig. 2B, transcripts of 50L increased from 4 h post infect (p.i.) in RGV-infected cells and the value of Log ΔRQ was more than six at 48 h p.i. A specific protein band for 50L could be detected from 8 h p.i. by western blot assay using anti-RGV 50L antibody and the quantity also increased with the elongation of infection time (Fig. 2C).
Molecular Mass Detection of RGV 50L
The MW of 50L shown in Fig. 2C was about 85 kDa, which was much larger than the data 55 kDa predicted using DNAStar. In order to confirm the result and assure the correctness of ORF prediction, further western blot analysis was performed with RGV-infected cells, 50L-pcDNA3.1 transfected cells, purified RGV particles and control cells. As shown in Fig. 3, positive signals could be detected in RGV-infected cells, 50L-pcDNA3.1 transfected cells and purified RGV particles (Lane 3–5 respectively), and the positive bands were about 85 kDa, while no signals were detected in mock-infected cells and pcDNA3.1 transfected cells (Lane 1 and 2 respectively). The result confirmed that the MW of RGV 50L was about 85 kDa and the predicted ORF was correct.
Figure 3. Molecular weight detection of 50L.
EPC cells were mock (EPC), infected by 1 M.O.I. RGV (RGV/EPC), transfected with plasmid pcDNA3.1 (pcDNA3.1) and 50L-pcDNA3.1 (50L-pcDNA3.1), respectively, after incubated for 12 h, the samples were detected by western blot assay. The purified RGV particles were analyzed together (Purified RGV). Protein markers were indicated.
Identification of RGV 50L as an Immediate-early Gene
To verify the transcriptional pattern of RGV, drug inhibition assay was carried out using Cycloheximide (CHX) and Cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside (Ara C). The samples were detected by RT-PCR and western blot analysis, and the 50L, dUTPase and MCP were confirmed to be IE, E and L transcripts gene, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4A, the 50L transcript could be detected in the RGV-infected samples and the samples treated with 50 µg ml−1 of CHX and infected with RGV for 6 h, and that treated with 100 µg ml−1 of Ara C and infected with RGV for 48 h, but not in samples only treated drugs above. Proteins extracted from the corresponding samples were detected by western blot analysis. The result was shown in Fig. 4B, which was consistent with RT-PCR analysis. The data demonstrated that RGV 50L is an IE gene during the in vitro infection.
Figure 4. RT-PCR and western blot detection of 50L under drug treatments.
(A) RT-PCR analysis of RGV 50L gene following treatments with CHX or AraC. Lane 1: CHX-treated uninfected at 6 h p.i.; lane 2: CHX-treated RGV-infected at 6 h p.i.; lane 3: RGV-infected at 6 h p.i.; lane 4: AraC-treated uninfected at 48 h p.i.; lane 5: AraC-treated RGV-infected at 48 h p.i.; lane 6: RGV-infected at 48 h p.i.; and DNA markers are indicated. Every sample was detected by RT-PCR using primers of 50L, dUTPase, MCP, respectively. β-actin gene was used as an internal control. (B) Western blot analysis of RGV 50L expression following treatments with CHX or AraC. Protein samples from described in (A) were analyzed by western blot analysis, and β-actin was detected under the same conditions as an internal control. Protein markers were indicated.
Intracellular Localization of RGV 50L
Immuno-fluorescence assay was performed to reveal the intracellular localizations of 50L distribution. ΔTK-RGV, which could emit green fluorescence, was used to confirm the infection of RGV. As shown in Fig. 5, 50L appeared early and persisted in the infected cells, and its localization changes of 50L followed two routes, one route was that weak red signals could be detected initially in the cytoplasm at 6 h post infection (p.i.), later appeared in both the cytoplasm and nucleolus at 8 h p.i, then mainly in the nucleolus at 10 h p.i. and the phenomenon was similar at 12 h p.i., subsequently, the RGV-infected cells were observed to be in clusters and strong signals could be detected in the cytoplasm, nucleus and viral matrix at 16 h p.i., at last, the signals aggregated mainly in the viral matrix; the other was that 50L co-localized with viral matrix (arrows): at first the viral matrix was very tiny, and the red fluorescent signal of 50L was a tiny spot, then viral matrices became bigger and bigger, and the red spotted signals of 50L also increased, at last the viral matrix became a large one near the nucleus and completely co-localized with 50L.
Figure 5. Immuno-fluorescence localization of 50L during RGV-infection.
EPC cells were infected with 1 M.O.I. of ΔTK-RGV for 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h, and fixed, permeabilized and stained with anti-RGV 50L serum and RRX-conjugated anti-mouse antibody, followed by Hoechst 33342. Mock-infected cells were used as a negative control. Red fluorescence showed the localization of the fusion protein (RRX), green fluorescence showed the virus infected cells (EGFP), the cell nuclei were shown by Hoechst 33342 (Hoechst 33342), and the merged photos were also listed (Merge). The arrows indicated viral matrices. Magnification ×100 (oil-immersion objective).
Dynamic changes of 50L-EGFP fusion protein in pEGFP-50L-transfected cell were detected. Strong green fluorescent signals (long arrows) first appeared mainly in the cytoplasm and little in the nucleus at 16 h after transfection, then less in the cytoplasm and more in the nucleus at 24 h, and only in the nucleus at 48 h (Fig. 6). Furthermore, in the site-directed mutagenesis assay, normal 50L and NLS mutant 50L were used for transfection, and green fluorescence was detected at 48 h after transfection. The results showed that green fluorescent signals only appeared in the nucleus in the pEGFP-50L transfected cells, however, positive signals (short arrows) only appeared in the cytoplasm of the pEGFP-50L-ΔNLS transfected cells at 48 h (Fig. 6), which suggested that the NLS motif of RGV 50L plays an important role in its localization in the nucleus of cells.
Figure 6. Subcellular localization of 50L detected by 50L-EGFP fusion protein.
First EPC cells were transfected with plasmid pEGFP-50L or pEGFP-N3 and the fusion proteins were detected at 16 h and 24 h. Then the cells were transfected with plasmid pEGFP-50L or pEGFP-50L-ΔNLS and the fusion proteins were detected at 48 h. Green fluorescence showed the localization of the fusion protein (EGFP), the cell nuclei were shown by Hoechst 33342 (Hoechst 33342), and the merged photos were also listed (Merged). 50L-EGFP fusion protein was indicated by long arrows and 50L-ΔNLS-EGFP protein was indicated by short arrows. Magnification ×100 (oil-immersion objective).
Effects of 50L on mRNA Levels of RGV 53R
RGV 53R is an important structural protein of RGV. The effect of RGV 50L on the transcriptional level of the gene was analyzed by qRT-PCR, which detected the relative mRNA level of 53R in the 50L-pcDNA3.1/pcDNA3.1 transfected cells after infected by RGV. Compared with the controls (pcDNA3.1 transfected cells), mRNA level of 53R was higher at 24 and 36 h p.i. (Fig. 7). The result implied that 50L protein may effect the transcription of RGV53R.
Figure 7. Effect of 50L over-expression on mRNA level of RGV 53R.
EPC cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3.1-50L. Then, after 24 h, the transfectants were mock-infected or infected by 1 M.O.I. of RGV respectively. Total RNAs were extracted at 24 and 36 h p.i. mRNA level of RGV 53R gene was detected by qRT-PCR. Relative quantities for each sample were expressed as N-fold changes in target gene expression relative to the same gene target in the calibrator sample, and normalized to the β-actin gene. The values represent averages of three independent experiments, with the range indicated (±SD). The significant differences between control and treatments groups are determined by T-TEST. *p<0.001.
Effect of siRNAs on RGV 50L Silencing
To knockdown RGV 50L, three chemically synthesized siRNAs targeted to 50L and a negative control siRNA were used to reduce 50L gene expression. As shown in Fig. 8, the band of 50L in the siRNA-319 transfected sample was the weakest at 24 h p.i., which revealed that siRNA-319 suppressed the expression of RGV 50L most effectively among the four siRNAs. So siRNA-319 was selected for viral titer assay (expressed as TCID50/ml). Viral titers of siRNA-NC and un-transfected samples did not show significant difference with that of siRNA-319 transfected samples, and cytopathic effects were similar among these samples (data not shown).
Figure 8. RGV 50L silencing assay by siRNA.

EPC cells, cultured in 24-well plates at about 8.0×105 cells/ml, were transfected with siRNAs targeted to 50L (siRNA-319, 594 and 811) and a negative control (siRNA-NC) at a final concentration of 150 nM, respectively. Then, 5 h later, the transfected and un-transfected cells were incubated with approximately 1 MOI RGV for 1 h and harvested at 24 h p.i. The silence effect of siRNAs on the expression of 50L was detected by western blot analysis. β-actin gene was used as an internal control.
Discussion
Although homologues of RGV 50L could be found in many iridoviruses belonging to the genera Ranavirus and Lymphocystivirus, those from lymphocystiviruses showed low identities with 50L, and the predicted molecular masses and identity percentages compared with 50L of those from other ranaviruses made a great difference, which may be related to different adaptabilities of different viruses.
The MW of 50L detected by western blot assay in RGV infected cells was 85 kDa, which was much larger than the predicted 55 kDa. Further western blot analysis of RGV-infected cells, pcDNA3.1–50L transfected cells and purified RGV particles showed that the positive bands were about 85 kDa and identical in the three samples (which was consisted with our previous report that RGV indeed contains a 85 kDa structural protein [2]). The data confirmed that the protein encoded by 50L gene was actually larger than the predicted data, and also demonstrated that the ORF prediction of 50L was correct. The difference in the actual and predicted MW suggested that RGV 50L may be subjected to eukaryotic post translational modifications, which are indispensable for functions of some proteins [27], [28]. This is in line with the characteristic of 50L sequence. PredictProtein analysis of 50L sequence showed that it contained many putative phosphorylation sites besides five N-myristoylation sites, such as one cAMP- and cGMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation site, four protein kinase C phosphorylation sites and fourteen casein kinase II phosphorylation sites (Table 2). Similar phenomena have been observed in Singapore grouper iridovirus (SGIV) ICP18 and ICP46 [29], [30].
Table 2. Summary of the putative post translational modifications in 50L protein.
| Motif | Site | Pattern | Randomized probability |
| cAMP- and cGMP- dependent protein kinasephosphorylation site | 339 to 342 KRRT | [RK](2)-x-[ST] | 1.572e−03 |
| Protein kinase C phosphorylation site | 70 to 72 SKK | [ST]-x-[RK] | 1.423e−02 |
| 180 to182 TAK | |||
| 376 to378 TLK | |||
| 422 to424 TKR. | |||
| Casein kinase II phosphorylation site | 35 to 38 TFSE | [ST]-x(2)-[DE] | 1.482e−02 |
| 78 to 81 SYAD | |||
| 100 to 103 SEPE | |||
| 189 to 192 TKTE | |||
| 191 to 194 TESE | |||
| 227 to 230 SDSE | |||
| 229 to 232 SENE | |||
| 289 to 292 TADD | |||
| 293 to 296 SSDD | |||
| 325 to 328 SDSE | |||
| 327 to 330 SEAE | |||
| 349 to 352 SSDD | |||
| 350 to 353 SDDE | |||
| 429 to 432 SKVD | |||
| 492 to 495 SWTE | |||
| N-myristoylation site | 23 to 28 GLGHTM | G-{EDRKHPFYW}-x(2)-[STAGCN]-{P} | 1.397e−02 |
| 246 to 251 GVRKTM | |||
| 379 to 384 GMCKTR | |||
| 390 to 395 GNKAAL | |||
| 488 to 493 GIRYSW |
The iridovirus genes are expressed in three temporal kinetic classes: immediate-early (IE), early (E) or delayed-early (DE) and late (L) during the viral infection, which can be defined by de novo viral protein synthesis and DNA replication inhibitors [31], [32]. Drug inhibition assay showed that 50L could not be inhibited by CHX or Ara C, suggesting that it was an IE gene, and the transcriptional pattern of which was identical to that of 3β-HSD an IE gene identified previously [6]. Many researches on large DNA viruses infecting mammals have been reported [33]–[35], but studies on characteristics of iridovirus IE genes are rare.
Intracellular localizations of 50L during RGV-infection detected by immuno-fluorescent assay revealed that location changes of 50L followed two patterns. One pattern was that 50L exhibited a cytoplasm-nucleus-vitromatrix distribution pattern, and the other was that 50L co-localized with viral matrix, which has not been reported in iridoviruses to date. Proteins are synthesized in the cytoplasm, so it was not surprising that 50L presented in the cytoplasm. However, it is believed that only ions and small molecules (relative molecular mass less than 40–60 kDa) are freely permeable to the nuclear pore complex (NPC), and macromolecules were imported by energy-dependent mechanisms [36], [37]. As stated in the above, the MW of 50L is about 85 kDa, which is too large to be translocated trough the NPC. 50L-EGFP fusion protein could also translocate from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in pEGFP-50L transfected cells, but how did it enter into the nucleus? A lysine-rich NLS was predicted at the N-terminus of the RGV 50L, and the NLS deleted mutation experiment showed that the normal 50L containing an NLS motif could be imported into the nucleus successfully, while the mutant 50L without an NLS could not be imported into the nucleus and was diffuse in the cytoplasm. The results revealed that nucleus translocation of 50L was NLS-dependent, as NLS could import macromolecular cargoes into the nucleus by binding to nuclear transport proteins through the nuclear pore [38]. The exportation of 50L from the nucleus to the cytoplasm may be related to the putative leucine-rich nuclear-exported signal (NES) motif formed by residuals 384–394, which could export macromolecules from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [39], [40]. But how the exportation actually took place needs further investigation.
Viral matrix, the place for virus assembly, contains viral DNA, large quantities of virus structural proteins and other components [14], [41]. In this study, a part of 50L was detected to accompany the viral matrix: the signals of 50L were very weak at first, then it gradually increased with the enlargement of viral matrices. This phenomenon was consisted with previous electron microscopy studies of NCLDVs-infected cells, which showed that small low density viral matrix formed in the cytoplasm as early as 3 h p.i., the size of which increased with time and with the production of progeny virions [5], [42]. As shown in Table 2, 50L was predicted to contain five putative M-G-X-X-X-(S/T/A) N-myristoylation sites, which were shown to be required for the assembly of many viruses [43], [44]. Furthermore, 50L, as a virus structural protein, appeared early and persisted in the cells till the late stage of infection, so it is no doubt that 50L plays an important role in RGV assembly and life circle.
Effects of RGV 50L on mRNA levels of RGV 53R detected by qRT-PCR showed that 50L could affect the transcriptional level of the important structural protein encoding gene. Second structure of 50L was predicted to contain a glutamine and glutamic acid-rich tri-repeated domain in the N-terminus and a SAP domain in the C-terminus which was proved to be a new type of eukaryotic DNA binding domain and associated in gene transcription [45], [46]. Whether the effect of 50L on the gene is related to these structures and whether 50L could effect transcriptions of other genes need further studies.
Furthermore, expression of RGV 50L could be reduced by siRNA-319. However, the virus yields of offspring did not show significant difference among the siRNA-319, siRNA-NC and un-transfected samples. This result may implicate that RGV 50L is not a gene associated with virus replication directly in vitro. Similar phenomenon was also observed in another ranavirus IE gene FV3 ICP18 knocked down using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (asMOs) [47]. Our findings suggested that 50L is directly related to virus assembly and implied that RGV 50L may contribute indirectly to ranavirus replication by affecting the expression of other structural proteins. Additionally, it is also possible that as the expression of RGV 50L was not inhibited completely by siRNA, a small quantity of RGV 50L may be enough for RGV replication. However, how RGV 50L exactly works still needs further studies.
In conclusion, we have cloned and characterized RGV 50L gene as an IE gene of RGV, and revealed that 50L appeared early and persisted in RGV-infected cells following two distribution patterns, one pattern was that 50L exhibited a cytoplasm-nucleus-viromatrix distribution pattern, and the other was that 50L co-localized with viral matrix. This phenomenon was the first report in iridoviruses. The data reveals that RGV 50L is a novel IE gene encoding a virus structural protein associated with virus assembly.
Materials and Methods
Virus and Cells
RGV was used in this study. Epithelioma papulosum cyprinid (EPC) cells grown in TC 199 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 25°C were used for virus propagation. Cell culture, virus propagation and DNA purification were performed as we described previously [2], [48].
Gene Cloning, Protein Sequence Analysis and Plasmids Construction
The full length of RGV 50L was amplified from genomic DNA with specific primers containing restriction enzyme cleavage sites, respectively (Table 3). PCR was carried out under the following conditions: 4 min at 94°C and then 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 56°C, 1.5 min at 72°C for 32 cycles, followed by 72°C for 10 min. The amplified fragments were cloned into prokaryotic vector pET32a (+), eukaryotic vector pEGFP-N3 and pcDNA3.1 (+) by corresponding restriction enzymes respectively. These different constructs were named pET32a-50L, pEGFP-50L and pcDNA3.1-50L, respectively. All the constructs were confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion and DNA sequencing.
Table 3. Primers used for plasmid construction, RT-PCR and quantity real time PCR.
| Primer name | Sequence (5′-3′) (enzyme cleavage site was underlined) |
| 50L-pro-F | ATTGGATCCATGCAAGTCTACTCTCC (BamHI) |
| 50L-pro-R | AAGCTT GTAACACAGATAATCTTCAG (HindIII) |
| 50L-GFP-F | ATTGCTAGCATGCAAGTCTACTCTCC (NheI) |
| 50L-GFP-R | CAAGGATCCCTCACACAGATAATCTTC (BamHI) |
| 50L-3.1-F | ATTGCTAGCATGGAAGTCTACTCTCC (NheI) |
| 50L-3.1-R | CAAAGGATCCTAACACAGATAATCTTC (BamHI) |
| 50L-ΔNSL-F | GCCTGTAGAGCAGCCTACAGCCGTTAGAAAGTCTAGAGCAAA |
| 50L-ΔNSL-R | TTTGCTCTAGACTTTCTAACGGCTGTAGGCTGCTCTACAGGC |
| 50L-RT-F | GGCAGAGAGCACATGCTGATGG |
| 50L-RT-R | GTCCAGCTGTACCTGATGCCCATG |
| DUT-RT-F | TGGTCCCCTCCTTTGGCAG |
| DUT-RT-R | ACCCCTGTCGGTAGAGTCCA |
| MCP-RT-F | GACTTGGCCACTTATGAC |
| MCP-RT-R | GTCTCTGGAGAAGAAGAA |
| 50L-qRT-F | AAAAGCTGGACGAGGCTACA |
| 50L-qRT-R | AGCTATGCCGTCTGCCTCTA |
| 53R-qRT-F | CCAAGGTCACCATGACACAG |
| 53R-qRT-R | CCAGAACGATGATGACGATG |
| β-actin-F | CACTGTGCCCATCTACGAG |
| β-actin-R | CCATCTCCTGCTCGAAGTC |
Note: Restriction sites are italicized.
The sequence data were compiled and analyzed using DNASTAR software. The non-redundant protein sequence database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (National Institutes of Health, MD, USA) was searched using BLASTP. Multiple sequence alignments were conducted using CLUSTAL_X v1.83 and edited using GeneDoc. Further patterns/signatures and structure analysis of 50L amino acid sequence were carried out by Network Protein Sequence Analysis server (NPS@ server) [49], and NLS was predicted using PredictProtein server (https://www.Predict protein.org) [50]. NES prediction of RGV 50L was performed using the CBS online service NetNES 1.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNES) [51].
NLS coding sequence was removed by site-directed mutagenesis using an overlap extension-PCR method in a two-step PCR procedure [52]. Briefly, in the first step, two simultaneous PCR reactions were performed. One reaction was performed with primers 50L-EGFP-F and 50L-ΔNLS-R to amplify the N-terminal of the 50L, the other reaction was performed with primers 50L-ΔNLS-F and 50L-EGFP-R to amplify the C-terminal. To obtain the full-length mutated fragment without the NLS, equal amounts of the two products from the first step were mixed and used as templates for the second PCR reaction, with primers 50L-EGFP-F and 50L-EGFP-R. Finally, the full length mutated fragments were ligated into pEGFP-N3 vector, and the construct was named EGFP-50L-ΔNLS.
Prokaryotic Expression, Protein Purification and Antibody Preparation
50L-His fusion protein expression, purification and antibody preparation were performed as we previously described [24]. Briefly, 50L-pro plasmid was induced with 1 mM IPTG at 37°C to express the recombinant protein after transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). The recombinant protein was purified according to the protocols of the HisBind Purification Kit (Novagen). To obtain antibody of RGV 50L, the purified fusion protein (about 400 µg) was mixed with equal volume of Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma) to immunize mice once every 7 days, and the antiserum was collected after the fourth immunization.
This experiment was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals of China. The protocol was approved by the Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment (Approval ID: SCXK 2008-0004). All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
Real-time Quantitative PCR and Western Blot Analysis of 50L Temporal Expression
Total RNAs and protein were prepared from cells infected by RGV at an M.O.I. of 1 at various time (0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 h) post-infection (p.i.) or mock infected, and subjected to real-time quantitative PCR and western blot analysis, respectively. The synthesis of cDNA was carried out as described previously [11]. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed with Fast SYBR® Green Master Mix using the StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems Ins., USA). Each reaction consisted of 1 µl of product from the diluted RT reaction, 10 µl 2×Fast SYBR® Green Master Mix, 250 nM of sense and antisense primer and sterile water. The mixture was incubated in a 48-well plate at 95°C for 20 sec, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 3 sec and 60°C for 30 sec. The melting curve analysis of PCR products from 60°C to 95°C were performed after PCR. Primers were named 50L-qRT-F/50L-qRT-R, 53R-qRT-F/53R-qRT-R and MCP-qRT-F/MCP- qRT-R, respectively (Table 1). For relative quantification of each sample, the relative standard curve quantification method was employed, and all experimental data were normalized to the β-actin gene. The data were expressed as means±SD from three independent experiments.
Western blot analysis was carried out as described previously [53]. Briefly, protein samples prepared above were electrophoresed in 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore). The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk in TBS (0.02 M Tris–HCl pH 7.4; 154 mM NaCl) for 1 h at room temperature. Then, the membrane was e incubated successively with 1∶1000 diluted RGV 50L mouse anti-serum for 2 h, and 1∶1000 diluted alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) antibody (Vector Laboratories) for 1 h. Finally, substrates NBT and BCIP (Sigma, USA) were used for color reaction. Internal control was carried out simultaneously by detecting β-actin protein.
Molecular Weight Identification of 50L
Western blot assay was applied to identify the molecular weight of 50L in eukaryotic cells. Plasmid pcDNA3.1-50L/pcDNA3.1 was transfected into EPC cells by Lipofectamine® 2000 Reagent (Invitrogen) following the instructions, and the samples were subjected to western blot analysis after incubated for 12 h. Mock- and RGV-infected cells at 12 h p.i. and purified RGV particles were analyzed together. Procedures for western blot were carried out as described above.
Drug Inhibition of de novo Protein Synthesis and Viral DNA Replication
Cycloheximide (CHX), as de novo protein synthesis inhibitor, and Cytosine β-D- arabinofuranoside (Ara C), as viral DNA replication inhibitor, were selected to classify the transcriptional model of RGV 50L. The experiment and RT-PCR analysis were carried out as described previously [8]. Specific primers were used to detect RGV 50L transcripts (50L-RT-F/50L-RT-R in Table 1). As control, two pairs of primers were used to detect the transcripts of the known early (E) transcription gene, dUTPase, and late (L) transcription gene, major capsid protein (MCP), respectively (primers DUT-RT-F/DUT-RT-R and MCP-RT-F/MCP-RT-R in Table 1) [8], [19]. β-actin was also performed as internal control. Protein from each sample was extracted and western blot analysis was carried out as described above.
Subcellular Localization
Subcellular localization of RGV 50L was performed by 50L-EGFP fusion protein expression and immunofluorescence. For EGFP fusion protein expression, EPC cells were cultured on coverslips in 6-well plates and transfected with plasmid pEGFP-50L, and plasmid pEGFP-N3 was used as control. After 16 h and 24 h incubation, the cells were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33342 in PBS for 5 min at room temperature.
To examine the effect of the NLS motif on RGV 50L translocation, the recombinant plasmids pEGFP-50L and pEGFP-50L-ΔNLS were used to track the movement of normal or mutant RGV 50L-EGFP fusion protein. The cells were fixed and stained as describe above at 48 h after transfection.
In order to observe the intracellular localization of 50L during RGV-infection, immuno- fluorescence microscopy was carried out as previously described [54]. EPC cells, grown on coverslips in 6-well plates, were either mock or infected with approximately 1 MOI RGV and fixed at 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 16 h and 24 h. After blocked in 10% bovine serum albumin at room temperature for 1 h, the cells were then successively incubated with mice anti-RGV-50L serum in 1% normal bovine serum and Rhodamine Red-X Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst-33342. All samples were examined under a Leica DM IRB fluorescence microscope.
Effects of 50L Over-expression on Transcriptional Level of RGV 53R
About 8.0×105 EPC cells were seeded into 24-well plates and transfected with empty vector pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3.1-50L using the method mentioned above after 16 h. The pcDNA3.1 and pcDNA3.1-50L-transfected EPC cells were termed as pcDNA3.1/EPC and 50L-pcDNA3.1/EPC, respectively. Following transfection for 24 h, the transfectants were mock-infected or infected by RGV at an M.O.I. of 1. Total RNAs were extracted at 24 and 36 h p.i., and mock infected cells were used as control. Subsequent real-time quantitative PCR for RGV 53R was done as above using primers 53R-qRT-F and 53R-qRT-R (Table 3) and relative quantities for each sample were expressed as N-fold changes in target gene expression relative to the same gene target in the calibrator sample, both normalized to the β-actin gene. The significant differences between control and treatments groups are determined by T-TEST.
Knockdown of 50L Expression by RNAi
Three duplex siRNAs targeted to 50L and a negative control (siNC) (Table 4, GenePharma, Shanghai, China) were chemically synthesized for knockdown of RGV 50L, and the experiment was carried out as described previously with some modifications [10], [23]. Briefly, EPC cells were cultured in 24-well plates at a density of about 8.0×105 cells/ml. The siRNAs were transfected at a final concentration of 150 nM, respectively. Then, the un-transfected and transfected cells were infected with approximately 1 MOI RGV after 5 h and incubated 1 h at 25°C, and the samples were mixed gently every 15 min and harvested at 24 h p.i. The silence effect of siRNAs was detected by western blot analysis, and un-treated cells were used as negative control. Subsequently, EPC cells were un-transfected or transfected with the siRNA with silence effect or siRNA-NC. RGV infection was carried out as described above, and every sample was triplicates. Finally, all samples were serially diluted 10-fold after three cycles of freeze-thaw, and 100 µL of each dilution was added to four repetitive wells of confluent EPC monolayers grown on 96-well plates to perform the TCID50 assay.
Table 4. siRNA sequences (sense strand) used in this study.
| siRNA name | Target sequence | Position in gene sequence |
| si50L594 | GGCUUGACCUCGUUGUAAUTT | 594–614 |
| si50L811 | CAGAGUCGCUUAUAACAAATT | 811–831 |
| si50L319 | CGGCCUUGUUUCCAGAUAUTT | 319–339 |
| siNC | UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT |
Funding Statement
This work was funded by National Major Basic Research Program (2010CB126303, 2009CB118704), Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-EW-Z-3), National Key Technologies R & D Program of China (2012BAD25B00), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31072239), and the FEBL research grant (Y15B121F01). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Zhang QY, Li ZQ, Jiang YL, Liang SC, Gui JF (1996) Preliminary studies on virus isolation and cell infection from disease frog Rana grylio . Acta Hydrobioliogica Sinica (Chinese with English Abstract) 20: 390–392. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhang QY, Xiao F, Li ZQ, Gui JF, Mao JH, et al. (2001) Characterization of an iridovirus form the cultured pig frog (Rana grylio) with lethal syndrome. Dis Aquat Org 48: 27–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zhang QY, Li ZQ, Gui JF (1999) Studies on morphogenesis and cellular interactions of Rana grylio virus in an infected fish cell line. Aquaculture 175: 185–197. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zhang QY, Zhao Z, Xiao F, Li ZQ, Gui JF (2006) Molecular characterization of three Rana grylio virus (RGV) isolates and Paralichthys olivaceus lymphocystis disease virus (LCDV-C) in iridoviruses. Aquaculture 25: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Huang XH, Huang YH, Yuan XP, Zhang QY (2006) Electron microscopic examination of the viromatrix of Rana grylio virus in a fish cell line. J Virol Methods 133: 117–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sun W, Huang YH, Zhao Z, Gui JF, Zhang QY (2006) Characterization of the Rana grylio virus 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and its novel role in suppressing virus-induced cytopathic effect. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 351: 44–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Huang YH, Huang XH, Gui JF, Zhang QY (2007) Mitochondrion-mediated apoptosis induced by Rana grylio virus infection in fish cells. Apoptosis 12: 1569–1577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhao Z, Ke F, Gui JF, Zhang QY (2007) Characterization of an early gene encoding for dUTPase in Rana grylio virus. Virus Res 123: 128–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zhao Z, Ke F, Shi Y, Zhou GZ, Gui JF, et al. (2009) Rana grylio virus thymidine kinase gene: an early gene of iridovirus encoding for a cytoplasmic protein. Virus Genes 38(2): 345–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ke F, Zhao Z, Zhang QY (2009) Cloning, expression and subcellular distribution of a Rana grylio virus late gene encoding ERV1 homologue. Mol Biol Rep 36: 1651–1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lei XY, Chen ZY, He LB, Pei C, Yuan XP, et al. (2012a) Characterization and virus susceptibility of a skin cell line from red-spotted grouper (Epinephelus akaara). Fish Physiol Biochem ) 38: 1175–1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. He LB, Ke F, Zhang QY (2012) Rana grylio virus as a vector for foreign gene expression in fish cells. Virus Res 163(1): 66–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lei XY, Ou T, Zhu RL, Zhang QY (2012b) Sequencing and analysis of the complete genome of Rana grylio virus (RGV). Arch Virol. In Press. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 14. Chinchar VG, Hyatt A, Miyazaki T, Williams T (2009) Family Iridoviridae: poor viral relations no longer. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 328: 123–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jancovich JK, Chinchar VG, Hyatt A, Miyazaki T, Williams T, et al. (2011) Family Iridoviridae. In: King AMQ, Lefkowitz E, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Eds. Virus Taxonomy: 9th Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA. 193–210.
- 16. Eaton HE, Metcalf J, Penny E, Tcherepanov V, Upton C, et al. (2007) Comparative genomic analysis of the family Iridoviridae: reannotating and defining the core set of iridovirus genes. Virol J 4: 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Miller D, Gray M, Storfer A (2011) Ecopathology of ranaviruses infecting amphibians. Viruses 3 (11): 2351–2373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gui JF, Zhu ZY (2012) Molecular basis and genetic improvement of economically important traits in aquaculture animals. Chin Sci Bull 57: 1751–1760 doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5213-0. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Chinchar VG, Yu KH, Jancovich JK (2011) The molecular biology of frog virus 3 and other iridoviruses infecting cold-blooded vertebrates. Viruses 3(10): 1959–1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mao J, Tham TN, Gentry GA, Aubertin A, Chinchar VG (1996) Cloning, sequence analysis, and expression of the major capsid protein of the iridovirus frog virus 3. Virology 216: 431–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Devauchelle G, Stoltz DB, Darcy-Tripier F (1985) Comparative ultrastructure of iridoviridae. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 116: 1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yan X, Yu Z, Zhang P, Battisti AJ, Holdaway HA, et al. (2009) The capsid proteins of a large, icosahedral dsDNA virus. J Mol Biol 385: 1287–1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kim YS, Ke F, Lei XY, Zhu R, Zhang QY (2010) Viral envelope protein 53R gene highly specific silencing and iridovirus resistance in fish cells by a miRNA. PLoS One 5(4): e10308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Whitley DS, Sample RC, Sinning AR, Henegar J, Chinchar VG (2011) Antisense approaches for elucidating ranavirus gene function in an infected fish cell line. Dev Comp Immunol 35(9): 937–948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zhao Z, Ke F, Huang YH, Zhao JG, Gui JF, et al. (2008) Identification and characterization of a novel envelope protein in Rana grylio virus. Journal of General Virology 89: 1866–1872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Song W, Lin Q, Joshi SB, Lim TK, Hew CL (2006) Proteomic studies of the Singapore grouper iridovirus. Mol Cell Proteomics 5(2): 256–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Topol LZ, Bardot B, Zhang Q, Resau J, Huillard E, et al. (2000) Biosynthesis, post-translation modification, and functional characterization of Drm/Gremlin. J Biol Chem 275(12): 8785–8793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kaothien P, Ok SH, Shuai B, Wengier D, Cotter R, et al. (2005) Kinase partner protein interacts with the LePRK1 and LePRK2 receptor kinases and plays a role in polarized pollen tube growth. Plant J 42(4): 492–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Xia L, Cao J, Huang X, Qin Q (2009) Characterization of Singapore grouper iridovirus (SGIV) ORF086R, a putative homolog of ICP18 involved in cell growth control and virus replication. Arch Virol 154(9): 1409–1416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Xia L, Liang H, Huang Y, Ou-Yang Z, Qin Q (2010) Identification and characterization of Singapore grouper iridovirus (SGIV) ORF162L, an immediate-early gene involved in cell growth control and viral replication. Virus Res 147(1): 30–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Williams T, Barbosa-Solomieu V, Chinchar VG (2005) A decade of advances in iridovirus research. Adv Virus Res 65: 173–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lua DT, Yasuike M, Hirono I, Aoki T (2005) Transcription program of red sea bream iridovirus as revealed by DNA microarrays. J Virol 79(24): 15151–15164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Castillo JP, Kowalik TF (2002) Human cytomegalovirus immediate early proteins and cell growth control. Gene 290(1–2): 19–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Robinson AR, Kwek SS, Hagemeier SR, Wille CK, Kenney SC (2011) Cellular transcription factor Oct-1 interacts with the Epstein-Barr virus BRLF1 protein to promote disruption of viral latency. J Virol 85(17): 8940–8953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Su D, Cha YM, West AE (2012) Mutation of MeCP2 alters transcriptional regulation of select immediate-early genes. Epigenetics 7(2): 146–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Nigg EA (1997) Nucleocytoplasmic transport: signals, mechanisms and regulation. Nature 386(6627): 779–787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zanta MA, Belguise-Valladier P, Behr JP (1999) Gene delivery: a single nuclear localization signal peptide is sufficient to carry DNA to the cell nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(1): 91–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Görlich D, Kutay U (1999) Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15: 607–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Moroianu J (1999) Nuclear import and export pathways. J Cell Biochem Suppl 32–33: 76–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liu YL, Zhang ZP, Zhao X, Wei HP, Deng JY, et al. (2012) Human cytomegalovirus UL94 is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein containing two NLSs and one NES. Virus Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2012.02.023. Accessed 5 Mar 2012. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41. Novoa RR, Calderita G, Arranz R, Fontana J, Granzow H, et al. (2005) Virus factories: associations of cell organelles for viral replication and morphogenesis. Biol Cell 97(2): 147–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Suzan-Monti M, La Scola B, Barrassi L, Espinosa L, Raoult D (2007) Ultrastructural characterization of the giant volcano-like virus factory of Acanthamoeba polyphaga Mimivirus. PLoS One 2(3): e328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Andrés G, García-Escudero R, Salas ML, Rodríguez JM (2002) Repression of African swine fever virus polyprotein 220-encoding gene leads to the assembly of icosahedral core-less particles. J Virol 76 (6): 2654–2666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Capul AA, Perez M, Burke E, Kunz S, Buchmeier MJ, et al. (2007) Arenavirus Z-glycoprotein association requires Z myristoylation but not functional RING or late domains. J Virol 81: 9451–9460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Aravind L, Koonin EV (2000) SAP - a putative DNA-binding motif involved in chromosomal organization. Trends Biochem Sci 25 (3): 112–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Ahn JS, Whitby MC (2003) The role of the SAP motif in promoting Holliday junction binding and resolution by SpCCE1. J Biol Chem 278(31): 29121–29129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sample R, Bryan L, Long S, Majji S, Hoskins G, et al. (2007) Inhibition of iridovirus protein synthesis and virus replication by antisense morpholino oligonucleotides targeted to the major capsid protein, the 18 kDa immediate-early protein, and a viral homolog of RNA polymerase II. Virology 358(2): 311–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Du C, Zhang Q, Li C, Miao D, Gui J (2004) Induction of apoptosis in a carp leucocyte cell line infected with turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) rhabdovirus. Virus Res 101(2): 119–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Combet C, Blanchet C, Geourjon C, Deléage G (2000) NPS@: Network Protein Sequence Analysis. TIBS 25. 3(291): 147–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rost B, Yachdav G, Liu J (2004) The PredictProtein Server. Nucleic Acids Research 32 (Web Server issue): W321–W326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51. Ia Cour T, Kiemer L, Mølgaard A, Gupta R, Skriver K, et al. (2004) Analysis and prediction of leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Protein Eng Des Sel 17(6): 527–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Heckman KL, Pease LR (2007) Gene splicing and mutagenesis by PCR-driven overlap extension. Nat Protoc 2(4): 924–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Chen ZY, Lei XY, Zhang QY (2011) The antiviral defense mechanisms in mandarin fish induced by DNA vaccination against a rhabdovirus. Vet Microbiol 157(3–4): 264–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Chen ZY, Liu H, Li ZQ, Zhang QY (2008) Development and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to sping viraemia of carp virus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 123: 266–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







