Skip to main content
The Texas Heart Institute Journal logoLink to The Texas Heart Institute Journal
. 1985 Dec;12(4):359–361.

Proximal Shunt Dissection: A Potential Problem in Carotid Endarterectomy

Thomas R Calhoun 1, Clifford M Kitten 1
PMCID: PMC341890  PMID: 15226995

Abstract

The use of a shunt routinely, selectively, or not at all in performing carotid endarterectomy is a controversial and thus far unsettled dilemma. We have routinely used a shunt because it allows the operation to be done meticulously and without a sense of urgency. However, we recently encountered a case in which proximal subintimal dissection occurred secondary to shunt insertion, which resulted in a postoperative neurologic deficit. We present the case, with a discussion of the probable cause of dissection and its future prevention.

Full text

PDF
359

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker W. H., Dorner D. B., Barnes R. W. Carotid endarterectomy: is an indwelling shunt necessary? Surgery. 1977 Sep;82(3):321–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker W. H., Littooy F. N., Hayes A. C., Dorner D. B., Stubbs D. Carotid endarterectomy without a shunt: the control series. J Vasc Surg. 1984 Jan;1(1):50–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouchier-Hayes D., De Costa A., MacGowan W. A. The morbidity of carotid endarterectomy. Br J Surg. 1979 Jun;66(6):433–437. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800660620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferguson G. G. Intra-operative monitoring and internal shunts: are they necessary in carotid endarterectomy? Stroke. 1982 May-Jun;13(3):287–289. doi: 10.1161/01.str.13.3.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hafner C. D. Minimizing the risks of carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1984 May;1(3):392–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hertzer N. R., Beven E. G., Greenstreet R. L., Humphries A. W. Internal carotid back pressure, intraoperative shunting, ulcerated atheromata, and the incidence of stroke during carotid endarterectomy. Surgery. 1978 Mar;83(3):306–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Imparato A. M., Ramirez A., Riles T., Mintzer R. Cerebral protection in carotid surgery. Arch Surg. 1982 Aug;117(8):1073–1078. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380320057015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lees C. D., Hertzer N. R. Postoperative stroke and late neurologic complications after carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg. 1981 Dec;116(12):1561–1568. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380240045007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Perdue G. D. Management of postendarterectomy neurologic deficits. Arch Surg. 1982 Aug;117(8):1079–1081. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380320063016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Piepgras D. G., Sundt T. M., Jr Clinical and laboratory experience with heparin-impregnated silicone shunts for carotid endarterectomy. Ann Surg. 1976 Nov;184(5):637–641. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197611000-00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Steed D. L., Peitzman A. B., Grundy B. L., Webster M. W. Causes of stroke in carotid endarterectomy. Surgery. 1982 Oct;92(4):634–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Thompson J. E., Talkington C. M. Carotid endarterectomy. Ann Surg. 1976 Jul;184(1):1–15. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197607000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Texas Heart Institute Journal are provided here courtesy of Texas Heart Institute

RESOURCES