Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) is involved, together with plant hormones, in the adaptation to Al stress in plants. However, the mechanism by which NO and plant hormones interplay to improve Al tolerance are still unclear. We have recently shown that patterns of plant hormones alteration differ between rye and wheat under Al stress. NO may enhance Al tolerance by regulating hormonal equilibrium in plants, as a regulator of plant hormones signaling. In this paper, some unsolved issues are discussed based on recent studies and the complex network of NO and plant hormones in inducing Al tolerance of plants are proposed.
Keywords: Al tolerance, nitric oxide, plant hormone, interaction, DELLA protein
Aluminum (Al) toxicity is a major limiting factor for crop production in acid soil, accounting for 30–50% of the world’s arable lands. The root elongation growth in plants exposure to Al is rapidly inhibited. Plant species have evolved diverse mechanisms of Al tolerance including external exclusion and internal chelation.1 However, most of the proposed mechanisms remain to be thoroughly deciphered. As a diffusive signal molecule, nitric oxide (NO) is also involved in Al tolerance in red kidney beat roots,2 besides the reduction of endogenous NO underlies Al-induced inhibition of root elongation in Hibiscus moscheutos.3 We found that Al stress reduces endogenous NO levels in root apical cells and exogenous NO can ameliorate Al toxicity in plants.4 NO acts as a crossroad in hormone signaling to trigger metabolic and physiological responses.5 Since plant hormones can promote root elongation, research on interaction NO with plant hormones will facilitate to elucidate the role of NO improving Al tolerance.
Root apex is an important place where synthesizes plant hormones such as abscisic acid (ABA) and cytokinin (CK). Al treatment increased ABA content in the roots of maize, soybean, barely and pea, but not in sugar maple.6 ABA biosynthesis and signaling transduction are involved in aluminum tolerance of moss Physcomitrella patens.7 ABA may play an important role in regulating Al-resistance of soybean as an Al-stress signal.8 Al rapidly stimulated an increase of CK to inhibit root elongation in Phaseolus vulgaris. The change in CK level precedes the Al-induced inhibition of root elongation, which may contribute to inhibition by promoting ethylene production or auxin accumulation.9 Al-induced ethylene production is associated with inhibition of root elongation in Lotus japonicas,10 but it is not a key factor in the Al-induced inhibition of root elongation that lags an increase of CK. Asymmetrical exposure of CK at the root tip promotes cell elongation, and ethylene signaling work downstream of CK of transducer the signal further. Moreover, auxin works downstream of both CK and ethylene, since differential auxin transport may cause differential cell elongation across the root by disrupting actin filament organization.11 Al-induced ethylene evolution may serve as a signal to alter auxin distribution in roots by disrupting auxin influx carrier AUXIN RESISTANT (AUX1)- and PIN FORMED (PIN2)-mediated auxin transport, leading to arrest of root elongation.12
Auxin is an essential phytohormone in regulation of cell division and elongation.13 Al inhibits auxin transportation from shoot to root apices. Distal transition zone (DTZ) of the maize primary root plays an outstanding role in the Al response, a signaling pathway exists in the root apex to mediate the Al signal between DTZ and elongation zone through alterations in basipetal auxin transport.14 The alteration of IAA distribution leads to the arrest of root elongation under Al treatment. Synchronously, IAA might be involved in aluminum-induced efflux of malic acid from wheat by acting on anion channel.15 The regional patterning within the root cap is shifted by very short exposure to AlCl3, which could be mimicked by application of the auxin-transport inhibitor.16 Auxin transport may be the target of Al toxicity, but polar auxin transport is insensitive to Al in Al-tolerant mutant AlRes4 of tobacco.17 As disruption of polar auxin transport or signaling diminishes the effects of GA on root elongation, GA signaling during root elongation is known to require auxin. The attenuated growth response corresponds with reduced RGA (a specific DELLA protein) degradation in root cells. GA promotes growth by stimulating destruction of the nuclear growth-repressing DELLA proteins, which is a mechanism for environmentally responsive growth regulation.18
DELLA proteins are a common crosstalk node for several interacting hormones including auxin, ethylene and ABA.19 Auxin promotes the GA-induced destabilization of some of the DELLA proteins to affect GA responses.20 Ethylene and ABA may also target DELLA proteins to exert antagonistic actions with GA during root growth. DELLAs inhibit cell elongation by binding to the DNA-recognition domain of a transcription factor called PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR4 (PIF4), as well as PIF3 and PIF5. This binding prevents the transcriptional activity of PIF from interacting with promoter elements and stimulating transcription of growth-related genes, but GA abrogates such repression by accumulating free PIF4 in the nucleus.21 Because ethylene, auxin and GA responses can be attributed to effects on DELLA function, DELLA plays a key integrative role in the phytohormone signal response network.22
Taking NO as a mediator, we found that NO decreases the values of IAA/GA and IAA/ZR under Al stress. The value of ABA/(IAA+GA+ZR) is associated with the stress-resistance in plants. NO may improve Al tolerance by integrating the increase of ABA/GA, ABA/(IAA+GA+ZR) and the decrease of GA/ZR in plants.4 CKs and ethylene inhibit root elongation as consequence of endogenous IAA lowering and Cks enhancement. On the other hand, auxin and CKs strongly inhibits root growth through the promotion of ethylene production. But auxin recovers root meristem activity to promote root elongation by the establishment of an endogenous IAA/CKs ratio with higher IAA levels.23 In addition, Cd-dependent reduction of NO level could alter Met adenosyltransferases (MAT-1) to increase ethylene biosynthesis.24
Auxin, ethylene and NO can influence the production of the other two at different levels, which contribute to the amplification of an activation signal.25 Transcripts putatively related to CK, auxin and ethylene metabolism were affected under Al treatment.26 Because S-nitrosylation is a ubiquitous NO mediated posttranslational modification that might regulate broad spectrum of proteins, it may be another biological switch like phosphorylation.27 Moreover, the ubiquitin-proteasome system plays a prominent regulatory role in plant hormone signaling pathway.28 GA promotes proteasome-dependent degradation of DELLA in nuclei. A battery of signaling molecules are activated during Al stress and this flow of signals is not linear as considerable cross-talk takes place between signaling cascades.29 Plant hormone signaling is integrated at several levels such as hormone distribution and gene expression during plant growth and development.30
Different from animal, NO responds to stress through interaction with hormones in plants (Fig. 1). NO synthesis is not only induces by CK in tobacco, parsley and Arabidopsis,31 but is also induces rapidly by ABA in pea, Vicia faba and Arabidopsis. NO is probably a potential regulator involved in CK action in regulating energy absorption, trapping and conversion.32 Al stress may disrupt NO homeostasis,33 which increases GA content. As a target of NO signaling, PIN1 links NO and auxin signaling in maintaining the size and activity of root apical meristem.34 NO is an important molecule operating downstream of auxin through a linear signaling pathway during root growth and development.35 NO supplementation can maintain auxin equilibrium by reducing the activity of IAA oxidase. GAs negatively regulated NO production, which promotes DELLA protein accumulation.36 Co-operating with NO for stress tolerance, ethylene may be a part of the downstream signal molecular in NO action.37 NO and TDZ could decrease ethylene output by inhibiting ACC synthase activity.38

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the signaling network involving NO and plant hormones during plant responses to aluminum stress. Aluminum stress activates hormone signal transduction pathways and subsequently the G-protein transduces extracellular signals modulated by plant hormones such as IAA, GA, ABA and ZR. Al treatment reduces endogenous NO levels in plants. On one hand, NO induces the synthesis of plant hormones to regulate DELLA degradation, together with NO-mediated inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis. On the other hand, NO also promotes the degradation of DELLA protein through S-nitrosylation to improve Al tolerance. Furthermore, NO enhances PIN expression repressed by ZR to accelerate the transportation and synthesis of IAA, thereby reduce Al-inhibition of root elongation. G; G protein; (→) indicates synergism between signals; (←→) indicates activation of a physiological response; (––|) indicates repressive response.
In conclusion, NO and plant hormones coincidently occur and can be mutually controlled in response to Al stress. In Al tolerance induction, NO and plant hormones often show overlapping and synergistic functions. The interactions and balances between NO and plant hormones under Al stress form a complex signaling network, which determine the Al-tolerant capacity of plants.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30960181; 30560070) and the innovative project of Guangxi Graduate Education (GXU11T31076).
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- ABA
abscisic acid
- Al
aluminum
- AUX1 (auxin influx carrier)
auxin resistant
- CK
cytokinin
- DTZ
distal transition zone
- GA
gibberellic acid
- IAA
indole-3-acetic acid
- NO
nitric oxide
- PIF
phytochrome interacting factor
- PIN
pin-formed
- RGA
GA receptor
- TDZ
thidiazuron
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/psb/article/19312
References
- 1.Kochian LV, Hoekenga OA, Pineros MA. How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:459–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang HH, Huang JJ, Bi YR. Nitrate reductase-dependent nitric oxide production is involved in aluminum tolerance in red kidney bean roots. Plant Sci. 2010;179:281–8. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tian QY, Sun DH, Zhao MG, Zhang WH. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) underlies aluminum-induced inhibition of root elongation in Hibiscus moscheutos. New Phytol. 2007;174:322–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.He HY, He LF, Gu MH, Li XF. Nitric oxide improves aluminum tolerance by regulating hormonal equilibrium in the root apices of rye and wheat. Plant Sci. 2012;183:123–30. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lamattina L, García-Mata C, Graziano M, Pagnussat G. Nitric oxide: the versatility of an extensive signal molecule. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:109–36. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bertrand A, Robitailie G, Boutin R, Nadeau P. Growth and ABA response of maple seedlings to aluminum. Tree Physiol. 1995;15:775–82. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cuming AC, Cho SH, Kamisugi Y, Graham H, Quatrano RS. Microarray analysis of transcriptional responses to abscisic acid and osmotic, salt, and drought stress in the moss, Physcomitrella patens. New Phytol. 2007;176:275–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02187.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hou NN, You JF, Pang JD, Xu MY, Chen G, Yang ZM. The accumulation and transport of abscisic acid in soybean (Glycine max L.) under aluminum stress. Plant Soil. 2010;330:127–37. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0184-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Massot N, Nicander B, Barcelo J, Poschenrieder C, Tillberg E. A rapid increase in cytokinin levels and enhanced ethylene evolution precede Al3+-induced inhibition of root growth in bean seedlings (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plant Growth Regul. 2002;37:105–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1020511007138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sun P, Tian QY, Zhao MG, Dai XY, Huang JH, Li LH, et al. Aluminum-induced ethylene production is associated with inhibition of root elongation in Lotus japonicus L. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:1229–35. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kushwah S, Jones AM, Laxmi A. Cytokinin interplay with ethylene, auxin, and glucose signaling controls Arabidopsis seedling root directional growth. Plant Physiol. 2011;156:1851–66. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.175794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sun P, Tian QY, Chen J, Zhang WH. Aluminium-induced inhibition of root elongation in Arabidopsis is mediated by ethylene and auxin. J Exp Bot. 2010;61:347–56. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Blilou I, Xu J, Wildwater M, Willemsen V, Paponov I, Friml J, et al. The PIN auxin efflux facilitator network controls growth and patterning in Arabidopsis roots. Nature. 2005;433:39–44. doi: 10.1038/nature03184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kollmeier M, Felle HH, Horst WJ. Genotypical differences in aluminum resistance of maize are expressed in the distal part of the transition zone. Is reduced basipetal auxin flow involved in inhibition of root elongation by aluminum? Plant Physiol. 2000;122:945–56. doi: 10.1104/pp.122.3.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang Y, Wang QL, Geng MJ, Guo ZH, Zhao ZQ. Effect of indole-3-acetic acid on aluminum-induced efflux of malic acid from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plant Soil. 2011;346:215–30. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0811-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Doncheva S, Amenós M, Poschenrieder C, Barceló J. Root cell patterning: a primary target for aluminium toxicity in maize. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:1213–20. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ahad A, Nick P. Actin is bundled in activation-tagged tobacco mutants that tolerate aluminum. Planta. 2007;225:451–68. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0359-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Achard P, Cheng H, De Grauwe L, Decat J, Schoutteten H, Moritz T, et al. Integration of plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal signals. Science. 2006;311:91–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1118642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weiss D, Ori N. Mechanisms of cross talk between gibberellin and other hormones. Plant Physiol. 2007;144:1240–6. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.100370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fu X, Harberd NP. Auxin promotes Arabidopsis root growth by modulating gibberellin response. Nature. 2003;421:740–3. doi: 10.1038/nature01387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Lucas M, Davière JM, Rodríguez-Falcón M, Pontin M, Iglesias-Pedraz JM, Lorrain S, et al. A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature. 2008;451:480–4. doi: 10.1038/nature06520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Achard P, Vriezen WH, Van Der Straeten D, Harberd NP. Ethylene regulates arabidopsis development via the modulation of DELLA protein growth repressor function. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2816–25. doi: 10.1105/tpc.015685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Peres LEP, Amar S, Kerbauy GB, Salatino A, Zaffari GR, Mercier H. Effects of auxin, cytokinin and ethylene treatments on the endogenous ethylene and auxin-to-cytokinins ratio related to direct root tip conversion of Catasetum fimbriatum Lindl. (Orchidaceae) into buds. J Plant Physiol. 1999;155:551–5. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80053-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rodríguez-Serrano M, Romero-Puertas MC, Pazmiño DM, Testillano PS, Risueño MC, Del Río LA, et al. Cellular response of pea plants to cadmium toxicity: cross talk between reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and calcium. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:229–43. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.131524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Romera FJ, García MJ, Alćntara E, Pérez-Vicente R. Latest findings about the interplay of auxin, ethylene and nitric oxide in the regulation of Fe deficiency responses by Strategy I plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2011;6:167–70. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.1.14111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kumari M, Taylor GJ, Deyholos MK. Transcriptomic responses to aluminum stress in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Genet Genomics. 2008;279:339–57. doi: 10.1007/s00438-007-0316-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Abat JK, Saigal P, Deswal R. S-nitrosyltaion - another biological switch like phosphorylation? Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2008;14:119–30. doi: 10.1007/s12298-008-0011-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Santner A, Estelle M. The ubiquitin-proteasome system regulates plant hormone signaling. Plant J. 2010;61:1029–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04112.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dat JF, Capelli N, Folzer H, Bourgeade P, Badot PM. Sensing and signalling during plant flooding. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2004;42:273–82. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Santner A, Estelle M. Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling. Nature. 2009;459:1071–8. doi: 10.1038/nature08122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tun NN, Holk A, Scherer GFE. Rapid increase of NO release in plant cell cultures induced by cytokinin. FEBS Lett. 2001;509:174–6. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03164-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shao RX, Wang KB, Shangguan ZP. Cytokinin-induced photosynthetic adaptability of Zea mays L. to drought stress associated with nitric oxide signal: probed by ESR spectroscopy and fast OJIP fluorescence rise. J Plant Physiol. 2010;167:472–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.He HY, Zhan J, He LF, Gu MH. Nitric oxide signaling in aluminum stress in plants. Protoplasma. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s00709-011-0310-5. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ferńndez-Marcos M, Sanz L, Lewis DR, Muday GK, Lorenzo O. Nitric oxide causes root apical meristem defects and growth inhibition while reducing PIN-FORMED 1 (PIN1)-dependent acropetal auxin transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:18506–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108644108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Correa-Aragunde N, Lanteri ML, Garcia-Mata C, Have A, Laxalt AM, Graziano M, et al. Nitric oxide functions as intermediate in auxin, abscisic acid and lipid signaling pathways. Plant Cell Monogr. 2007;5:1861–70. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lozano-Juste J, León J. Nitric oxide regulates DELLA content and PIF expression to promote photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011;156:1410–23. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.177741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang HH, Liang XL, Wan Q, Wang XM, Bi YR. Ethylene and nitric oxide are involved in maintaining ion homeostasis in Arabidopsis callus under salt stress. Planta. 2009;230:293–307. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-0946-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mortazavi SN, Talebi SF, Naderi RA, Sharafi Y. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis by nitric oxide and thidiazuron during postharvest of rose. J Med Plants Res. 2011;5:5177–83. [Google Scholar]
