Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Lab Hematol. 2012 May 10;34(5):473–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2012.01420.x

P2RY1 and P2RY12 polymorphisms and on-aspirin platelet reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease

AYSE ANIL TIMUR *, GURUNATHAN MURUGESAN *, LI ZHANG , PHYU PHYU AUNG *, JOHN BARNARD , QING K WANG , PASCALE GAUSSEM §, ROY L SILVERSTEIN , DEEPAK L BHATT **, KANDICE KOTTKE-MARCHANT *
PMCID: PMC3419334  NIHMSID: NIHMS365621  PMID: 22574824

SUMMARY

Introduction

Association of P2RY1 and P2RY12 polymorphisms with on-aspirin platelet reactivity was investigated.

Materials and Methods

Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmission aggregometry and TxB2 assay in 423 CAD (coronary artery disease) patients on aspirin. High residual platelet reactivity (RPR) was defined by≥20% and ≥70% maximal aggregation stimulated with 0.5 mg/mL AA and 10 μM ADP, respectively. Moderate RPR was considered aggregation ≥20% with AA, ≥70% with ADP, or ≥1 ng/mL stimulated TxB2. Fourteen P2RY1 and 35 P2RY12 SNPs were genotyped.

Results

High RPR was detected in 24% of the patients. Moderate RPR was observed in 31% with AA, 57% with 5 μM ADP, and 82% with 10 μM ADP. Stimulated TxB2 was ≥1 ng/mL in 23% of patients. P2RY12 SNP rs9859538 was associated with high RPR (OR=2.16, 95% CI=1.24–3.75, p-value=0.004). Four P2RY12 SNPs, rs1491974, rs10513398, rs3732765, and rs10935841, showed association with moderate RPR (OR=1.79–2.94, p-value=0.04–0.028), while five, rs7615865, rs1388623, rs1388622, rs7634096, and rs7637803, were associated with low RPR (OR=0.50–0.55, p-value=0.008–0.026), following ADP stimulation. TxB2 level <1 ng/mL was linked to five P2RY1 SNPs, rs1439010, rs1371097, rs701265, rs12497578, and rs2312265, (OR=0.36–0.54, p-value=0.003–0.039).

Conclusions

Polymorphisms in P2RY1 and P2RY12 are associated with on-aspirin platelet reactivity in CAD patients.

Keywords: Coronary artery disease, aspirin, platelet reactivity, P2RY1 and P2RY12 receptors, SNP

INTRODUCTION

Aspirin is an established and commonly used antiplatelet medication. It irreversibly inhibits the enzyme cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) by chemical modification and leads to inhibition of prostaglandin H2 production from arachidonic acid (AA) and eventually inhibition of TxA2 production in platelets (Patrono & Rocca, 2008). Clinical studies have demonstrated that aspirin therapy is associated with a 12–25% reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke or vascular death among high risk patients (Berger, Brown & Becker, 2008; Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration, 2009). However, there are individual variations in response to aspirin creating the term “aspirin non-responsiveness” or “aspirin resistance”. Although aspirin resistance has been reported to occur in 5.5% to 60% of the population tested, the exact prevalence of aspirin resistance is still unclear due to lack of a standard definition of aspirin response and differences in platelet function assays (Gasparyan, Watson & Lip, 2008). It has been shown that aspirin resistant patients have about a 4-fold risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or vascular events compared with aspirin responsive patients [Krasopoulos et al., 2008]. Variability in aspirin response has been attributed to clinical, cellular and genetic factors such as polymorphic nucleotide changes in the genes coding for GPIIIa, collagen receptors GPIa-IIa, GPVI, and GPIb-IX-V, purinergic P2RY1 and P2RY12 receptors, COX-1 and COX-2, and factor XIII (FXIII) (Cohen, 2009; Cattaneo, 2007; Goodman, Ferro & Sharma, 2008; Rozalski et al., 2005).

P2RY1 and P2RY12 are the G-protein-coupled receptors in which ADP is the physiological agonist (Smyth et al., 2009; Volonte & D’Ambrosi, 2009). P2RY1 positively couples to phospholipase C (PLC) via Gαq which triggers Ca2+ release from intracellular stores leading to platelet shape change and rapid, reversible platelet aggregation. On the other hand, P2RY12 negatively couples to adenylyl cyclase via Gαi resulting in slow, irreversible platelet aggregation. The P2RY1 and P2RY12 genes are both located on chromosome 3. P2RY1 spans 4 kb. It is mainly transcribed into two mRNA species which are different in length of 5′ and 3′UTRs. Single exon encodes for a 372-amino acid protein (Ayyanathan, Naylor & Kunapuli, 1996; Leon et al., 1996). A polymorphism (A1622G, rs701265) in P2RY1 has been shown to associate with higher platelet aggregation in response to ADP in healthy volunteers (Hetherington et al., 2005). P2RY12 spans 47 kb and has also two main RNA variants which are 47 kb and 3 kb in length [Hollopeter et al., 2001]. Although the longer transcript has three exons and the short transcript has two exons, a single exon encodes for the whole 342-amino acid receptor. Four polymorphisms in P2RY12 (i-C139T, rs10935838; i-T744C, rs2046934; i-ins801A, rs5853517; G52T, rs6809699) are in complete linkage disequilibrium and compose two haplotypes, H1 and H2. The less common H2 haplotype has been shown to be associated with increased platelet aggregation after ADP stimulation in healthy subjects and in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) (Fontana et al., 2003a; Fontana et al., 2003b).

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, a direct antagonist of P2RY12, has been found to be more effective in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than treatment with aspirin alone (Yusuf et al., 2001; Steinhubl et al., 2002). A P2RY1 polymorphism (C893T, rs1065776) was reported to associate with a more than 3-fold increase in aspirin resistance in Caucasian male patients with a history of MI (Jefferson et al., 2005). Moreover, P2RY12 receptors have been shown to be critical in the TxA2-dependent pathway of platelet aggregation (Armstrong et al., 2011). These studies suggest a link between ADP receptors and aspirin mechanism.

In this study, to investigate the potential roles of P2RY1 and P2RY12 genes in aspirin response and atherothrombotic events, we genotyped 423 coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with a history of MI on aspirin for 14 P2RY1 and 35 P2RY12 SNPs and assessed the associations of defined genotypes with platelet reactivity and clinical characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study subjects

A total of 523 CAD patients were enrolled from a prospective study called “The Validation of Cardiovascular Disease Genetic markers in the Cleveland Clinic Coronary Artery Disease Population Study: GeneQuest2”. A subgroup of this cohort composed of 332 male subjects was studied previously by Jefferson et al. (Jefferson et al., 2005). All had a prior history of MI documented through ECG (electrocardiogram) or biochemical markers and were scheduled to undergo PCI at the Cleveland Clinic. Exclusion criteria included: use of ticlopidine, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, steroidal or non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors; administration of heparin or low molecular weight heparin within 24 h before enrollment; major surgical procedure within one week before enrollment; malignant paraproteinemias; family or personal history of bleeding disorders; history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, history of myeloproliferative disorders. The 423 patients who were Caucasian and only on aspirin were further selected for this study. Daily aspirin dose taken was 325 mg and 81 mg in 68% and 18% of the patients, respectively. Seven patients (2%) were taking more than 325 mg aspirin, 12 patients (3%) had 82–320 mg aspirin, and 5 (1%) were on <81 mg aspirin per day. No data was available about the aspirin dose taken by 35 patients (8%). Except one, all patients were taking non-enteric coated aspirin. Aspirin therapy compliance was verified by clinical history prior to sample collection. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. All participants gave informed consent before the enrollment.

Sampling

Whole blood samples were collected in a 3.2% sodium citrate tube for the assessment of platelet reactivity by platelet aggregation and thromboxane B2 (TxB2) level and genomic DNA extraction. Two tubes of whole blood were additionally collected in a serum separator and EDTA (ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid) tubes for a complete blood count, cholesterol, inflammatory and cardiovascular marker assays, and platelet COX-1 analysis. Time between the last aspirin intake and blood draw was less than 24 hours in 77% of the patients (unknown for 13%). Majority of the patients (79%) were fasting at blood draw.

Platelet aggregation assay by light transmission aggregometry (LTA)

Within 1 h of blood collection, citrated whole blood was centrifuged at 200g for 10 minutes at room temperature. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) was transferred to a polypropylene tube and the remaining specimen was further centrifuged at 2,500g for 10 minutes to obtain platelet poor plasma (PPP). The PRP platelet count was measured and adjusted to a target platelet count of 250 (200–300) X 103/μl with autologous PPP. The platelet aggregation assay was performed in adjusted PRP using BioData PAP-4 platelet aggregometer (BioData Corp., Horsham, PA). The baseline optical density was set with PPP. Platelet aggregation was stimulated with 0.5 mg/mL AA and 5 and 10 μM ADP and recorded for 10 minutes (Hayward et al., 2010). At 10 minutes, indomethacin/EDTA solution was then added to prevent further platelet aggregation. Tubes were centrifuged and supernatants were kept frozen at −80°C for TxB2 assay.

Two measures of aggregation were analyzed: % aggregation at the end of 10 minutes (final aggregation) and maximal % aggregation.

Thromboxane B2 (TxB2) assay

Activation-dependent release of TxB2 “stimulated TxB2”, a stable metabolite of TxA2, was measured ex vivo in the supernatants of centrifuged platelet aggregates after completion of the AA-stimulated platelet aggregation assay. Samples were first purified by using Amprep C2 column (Amersham Biosciences, NJ) and TxB2 was detected by a competitive immunoassay (Assay Designs, Inc., MI) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The mean of duplicates and coefficient of variance were used. A ≥1 ng/mL TxB2 level was selected as cut-off based on the stimulation of platelets with 0.5 mg/mL AA from 40 healthy donors blocked by in vitro addition of 30 μmol/L aspirin (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St-Louis, MO). Mean minus one SD of the lowest TxB2 quartile from the healthy participants was 1.060 ng/mL and mean plus one and 2SD of the third TxB2 quartile from the patients was 0.925 and 1.102 ng/mL, respectively.

COX-1 analysis by Western blotting

PRP was prepared from the whole blood in EDTA as described above. A polypropylene tube containing PRP was further centrifuged at 800g for 10 minutes at room temperature. After several washing steps, the recovered pellet was lysed with sample buffer containing protease inhibitors and stored at −80°C until use. Western blot analysis was carried out according to a standard electrophoresis protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and a chemiluminescence detection system (ECL Plus, Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) using autoradiography. Briefly, the protein concentration of each lysate was determined by BCA protein assay (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) and 10 μg of total protein was subjected to Western blot analysis along with the known amounts of purified ovine COX-1 reference protein (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI). Mouse monoclonal primary antibodies against COX-1 (Cayman Chemical), followed by a secondary horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-mouse antibody were used for detection (Censarek et al., 2004). Band intensities of sample and reference proteins were quantified from the autoradiograph using an NIH image program.

Definition of residual platelet activity

Aspirin resistance has been previously defined as ≥20% AA- and ≥70% ADP (10 μM)-stimulated maximal platelet aggregation and validated by clinical outcome (Gum et al. 2001; Gum et al., 2003). Here, patients who met both criteria were defined as having high residual platelet reactivity. Patients with ≥20% AA-, ≥70% ADP (5 or 10 μM)-stimulated maximal aggregations, or ≥1 ng/mL stimulated TxB2 were considered as having moderate RPR. Low RPR was defined as <20% AA, <70% ADP and <1 ng/mL stimulated TxB2.

Genotyping

Genotyping was carried out by the melting curve analysis of FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) hybridization probes, TaqMan assay, and SNP array-based genotyping. SNPs for the first two strategies were selected from several databases including the Children’s Hospital Informatics Program (CHIP) at http://snpper.chip.org, the SeattleSNPs at http://pga.gs.washington.edu/, MIT Broad Institute’s Tagger program at http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/tagger/server.html, and the International HapMap Project at http://www.hapmap.org/. SNPs were picked on the basis of an r2 of 0.8 and a minor allele frequency of 1% from Caucasian population, CEU. A cardiovascular gene-centric SNP array, Infinium CVDSNP55 (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA), was also utilized to target SNPs from the P2RY1 and P2RY12 genes. (Keating et al., 2008). A total of 49 SNPs covering both P2RY1 and P2RY12 were analyzed in this study. Information about these SNPs and their LD (linkage disequilibrium) maps are given in Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Figure 1, and Supplementary Figure 2.

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood collected in sodium citrate using DNAzol reagent (DNAzolBD Reagent, Invitrogen, CA). Primers and probes for the melting curve analysis were designed using a software provided with the LightTyper instrument (Roche Applied Sciences, Indianapolis, IN) and processed according to the manufacturer (TIB MOLBIOL, Nutley, NJ) (Murugesan et al., 2006). Each analysis was validated by using reference DNAs with known genotypes. The TaqMan assay (Applied Biosytems Inc., Foster City, CA) was performed in a 5 μl volume containing 0.125 μl of 40× Allelic Discrimination Assay Mix, 2.5 μl of TaqMan Universal PCR (polymerase chain reaction) Master Mix, and 25 ng of genomic DNA. PCR was performed in a Dual 384-Well GeneAmp PCR System 9700 using a standard program recommended by the manufacturer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Genotypes were generated by the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System and automatic allele calling was performed with the default settings using data collection and analysis software version 2.1. The quality of SNP genotyping was verified by independently replicating the allelic calls of a number of randomly selected samples or by direct DNA sequence analysis of 12 samples. The nucleotide sequences of the primers and probes used in both techniques are available upon request. Illumina SNP array-based genotyping was performed by the genomics core facility in Cleveland Clinic.

All 423 Caucasian patients from the study were used to determine population substructure using the software EIGENSTRAT based on all TaqMan and CVDSNP55 array SNPs. After pruning of all the SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (LD) (r2>0.3), the EIGENSTRAT analysis and principle components analysis identified no significant population substructure occurred in the current samples (Price et al., 2006).

Statistical analysis

All data mining and statistical analyses were carried out with the R statistical package (http://www.r-project.org). Categorical variables are described by frequency distributions and contingency tables. Continuous variables are summarized by mean (SD). Platelet function data including platelet aggregation and TxB2 level were first considered as continuous outcomes and then as categorical outcomes by categorizing into two groups based on definition of high and moderate RPR (for high RPR: <20%/<70% and ≥20%/≥70%; for moderate RPR: </≥20% or </≥70% or </≥1 ng/mL TxB2) (Gum et al. 2001; Gum et al., 2003). The total number of MIs was also considered as binary data, =/>1, standing for without/with recurrence of MI. Pair-wise linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs was assessed using the LDheatmap package in R software (Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 2).

To detect the association between single SNP and the outcome, for each SNP, a generalized linear model with an appropriate link (logit link and identity link for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively) was fitted, with each outcome as the response variable, the SNP as the predictive variable and age, gender, and smoking status as covariates. The P values of the likelihood ratio test were obtained from a comparison with the null model (i.e., only covariates in the model). An adjustment for multiple comparisons was implemented by controlling the false discovery rate at less than 0.15 across each gene.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the study cohort

A total of 423 CAD patients with a history of MI on aspirin were analyzed. Demographics of the study population are shown in Table 1. The majority of the subjects were male (82%). The mean age of the cohort was 65.4 years. Body mass index (BMI) was 30±7.6 kg/m2 (Mean±SD) falling into the overweight and obese ranges. Smoking, including past and current smoking, was high among patients (70%). Hypertension and dyslipidemia were also prevalent in the group, 70% and 84%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus was present in 27% of the patients. Patients also had a history of other vascular problems such as peripheral artery diseases (PAD) (10%), carotid/cerebrovascular disease (CA/CVD) (10%), and stroke (7%). More than one episode of MI occurred in 25% of the patients. A substantial number of patients had previous history of PCI (69%), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (50%), or other coronary procedures (92%). White blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein (CRP), high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, and platelet COX-1 measures are also shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study cohort

n (%)* or Mean±SD
Male 345 (82)
Female 78 (18)
Age 65±10
BMI (kg/m2) 30±8
Smoking 294 (70)
Hypertension 298 (70)
Dyslipidemia 357 (84)
Diabetes mellitus 116 (27)
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) 42 (10)
Carotid/Cerebrovascular Disease (CVD) 43 (10)
Stroke 26 (6)
Age at first Myocardial Infarction (MI) 56±11
Total number of MI
 =1 315 (75)
 >1 104 (25)
Previous Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) 292 (69)
Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) 210 (50)
Previous other coronary procedure(s) 390 (92)
Angina pectoris, Stable 273 (65)
Angina pectoris, Unstable 134 (32)
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 142±23
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 80±13.5
WBC x 103/μL 6.6±1.8
CRP (mg/dL) 0.7±1.7
HDL cholesterol mg/dL (mmol/L) 40±13 (1±0.3)
Total cholesterol mg/dL (mmol/L) 171±51 (4.4±1.3)
COX1 (ng/mg protein) 8.7±1.7

BMI, body mass index; HDL, high density lipoprotein; CRP, C-reactive protein; WBC, white blood cell; COX1, cyclooxygenase 1; SD, standard deviation.

*

Total number of subjects may vary depending on the availability of data.

Platelet reactivity of the patients

Based on the criteria of both ≥20% AA- and ≥70% ADP (10 μM)-stimulated maximal platelet aggregation, 24% of the patients were defined as having high RPR (Table 2). On the other hand, moderate RPR was observed in 31% of the patients with≥20% maximal platelet aggregation in response to AA stimulation and in 57% and 82% of the patients with ≥70% maximal platelet aggregation after 5 and 10 μM ADP stimulation, respectively. TxB2 levels were also higher than 1 ng/mL in 23% of the patients.

Table 2.

On-aspirin platelet reactivity of the study patients

Platelet Reactivity n (%)* Mean±SD
AA (0.5 mg/mL)- and ADP (10 μM)-stimulated aggregration (%) <20 and <70 ≥20 and ≥70

 10 minutes 248 (59) 38 (9)
 Maximum 67 (16) 101 (24)
AA (0.5 mg/mL)-stimulated aggregation (%) <20 ≥20

 10 minutes 353 (84) 68 (16) 14±15
 Maximum 291 (69) 130 (31) 19±16
ADP (5 μM ADP)-stimulated aggregation (%) <70 ≥70

 10 minutes 363 (86) 58 (14) 50±19
 Maximum 179 (43) 242 (57) 71±14
ADP (10 μM ADP)-stimulated aggregation (%) <70 ≥70

 10 minutes 265 (63) 156 (37) 65±17
 Maximum 74 (18) 347 (82) 79±12
TxB2 (ng/mL) <1 ≥1 25±122

288 (77) 86 (23)

TxB2, thromboxane B2; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; AA, arachidonic acid; SD, standard deviation.

*

Total number of subjects may vary depending on the availability of data.

Platelet reactivity and characteristics of the patients

Patients with high RPR were significantly older than other study patients (mean±SD, 70±9 years versus 64±12 years, p-value=0.001). Interestingly, patients with recurrent MI displayed higher maximal and final platelet aggregation in response to AA-stimulation (22.8% versus 17.9%, p-value=0.026 and 17.5% versus 13%, p-value=0.037, respectively). We did not find a significant difference in COX-1 enzyme levels between patients with elevated and non-elevated RPRs (p-value=0.568).

P2RY1 and P2RY12 polymorphisms and platelet reactivity

The significant associations found between the P2RY1 and P2RY12 SNPs and platelet reactivity are shown in Table 3 under three groups (Tables 3a-c). A P2RY12 SNP, rs9859538, was found to be associated with high RPR in our patient population (Table 3a). The variant allele of this SNP was more frequent in patients displaying≥20% AA- and ≥70% ADP (10 μM)-stimulated maximal platelet aggregation (OR=2.16, 95% CI=1.24–3.75, p-value=0.004). Moreover, homozygosity or heterozygosity for the minor alleles of four P2RY12 SNPs, rs1491974, rs10513398, rs3732765 and rs10935841, showed association with moderate RPR in response to ADP stimulation (Table 3b). While two SNPs, rs1491974 and rs10513398, were associated with 5 μM ADP-stimulated final aggregation (OR=2.69–2.94, p-value=0.004–0.008), two others, rs3732765 and rs10935841, showed association with 10 μM ADP-stimulated maximal aggregation (OR=1.79–1.80, p-value=0.026–0.028). On the other hand, five SNPs were found to be associated with low RPR (Table 3c). Maximal aggregation in response to 10 μM ADP-stimulation was <70% in most of the patients with minor alleles of SNPs rs7615865, rs1388623, rs1388622, rs7634096 and rs7637803 (OR=0.50–0.55, p-value=0.008–0.026). Similarly, minor alleles of five P2RY1 SNPs, rs1439010, rs1371097, rs701265, rs12497578, and rs2312265, were associated with <1 ng/mL TxB2 levels (OR=0.36–0.54, p-value=0.003–0.039).

Table 3.

Significant SNPs associated with platelet reactivity defined by reference cut-off points in Caucasian patients (N=423) based on FDR<0.15

a. SNPs associated with high residual platelet activity
Platelet Reactivity* Gene rs SNP ID Genotype n (%) p-value (FDR)§ Odds Ratio (95% CI)
AA-and ADP-stimulated aggregation (%) <20 and/or <70 ≥20 and ≥70

0.5 mg/mL AA and 10 μM ADP, maximum P2RY12 rs9859538 A/A
G/A+G/G
110 (35)
203 (65)
22 (22)
77 (78)
0.004 (0.156) 2.16 (1.24, 3.75)
b. SNPs associated with moderate residual platelet activity
Platelet Reactivity* Gene rs SNP ID Genotype n (%) p-value (FDR)§ Odds Ratio (95% CI)
ADP-stimulated Aggregation (%) <70 ≥70

5 μM ADP, 10 minutes P2RY12 rs1491974 C/C
T/C+T/T
105 (30)
249 (70)
9 (15.5)
49 (84.5)
0.004 (0.133) 2.94 (1.33, 6.51)
rs10513398 G/G
A/G+A/A
104 (29)
254 (71)
9 (15.5)
49 (84.5)
0.008 (0.133) 2.69 (1.23, 5.88)
10 μM ADP, maximum P2RY12 rs3732765 G/G
A/G+A/A
36 (49)
37 (51)
124 (36)
219 (64)
0.028 (0.138) 1.79 (1.07, 3.00)
rs10935841 G/G
A/G+A/A
36 (49)
37 (51)
124 (36)
220 (64)
0.026 (0.138) 1.80 (1.07, 3.01)
c. SNPs associated with low residual platelet reactivity
Platelet Reactivity* Gene rs SNP ID Genotype n (%) p-value (FDR)§ Odds Ratio (95% CI)
ADP-stimulated Aggregation (%) <70 ≥ 70

10 μM ADP, maximum P2RY12 rs7615865 C/C
T/C+T/T
24 (34)
47 (66)
164 (48.4)
175 (51.6)
0.019 (0.138) 0.53 (0.31, 0.91)
rs1388623 C/C
A/C+A/A
26 (35.6)
47 (64.4)
179 (52)
165 (48)
0.008 (0.138) 0.50 (0.29, 0.84)
rs1388622 G/G
A/G+A/A
26 (35.6)
47 (64.4)
179 (52)
165 (48)
0.008 (0.138) 0.50 (0.29, 0.84)
rs7634096 G/G
A/G+A/A
40 (55)
33 (45)
234 (68)
110 (32)
0.026 (0.138) 0.55 (0.33, 0.93)
rs7637803 G/G
A/G+A/A
40 (55)
33 (45)
234 (68)
110 (32)
0.026 (0.138) 0.55 (0.33, 0.93)
TxB2 (ng/mL) <1 ≥1

P2RY1 rs1439010 T/T
C/T+C/C
200 (70)
86 (30)
67 (82)
15(18)
0.035 (0.114) 0.53 (0.28, 0.99)
rs1371097 C/C
T/C+T/T
199 (70)
86 (30)
66 (81.5)
15 (18.5)
0.039 (0.114) 0.54 (0.29, 1.01)
rs701265 A/A
G/A+G/G
200 (70)
87 (30)
67 (82)
15 (18)
0.031 (0.114) 0.52 (0.28, 0.97)
rs12497578 C/C
G/C+G/G
220 (77)
66 (23)
74 (90)
8 (10)
0.003 (0.067) 0.36 (0.16, 0.79)
rs2312265 A/A
G/A+G/G
200 (70)
87 (30)
67 (82)
15 (18)
0.031 (0.114) 0.52 (0.28, 0.97)

FDR, false discovery rate; CI, confidence interval; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; TxB2, thromboxane B2.

*

Only assays of platelet reactivity with significant associations are shown.

Wild type genotype is shown in bold.

P-values were obtained by logistic regression analysis adjusted by gender, age, and smoking.

§

Associations are based on FDR<0.15 except the one in Table 3a which is 0.156.

DISCUSSION

In the current study, P2RY12 SNP rs9859538 was found to be associated with high RPR. The minor allele of rs9859538 was associated with a 2-fold increase in having both ≥20 AA- and ≥70% ADP (10 μM)-stimulated maximal platelet aggregation. This SNP is located in intron 1 of the P2RY12 gene and not in LD with any SNPs constituting H haplotype (Supplementary Figure 2). Moreover, we found an association between moderate RPR in response to ADP and P2RY12 SNPs rs1491974, rs10513398, rs3732765 and rs10935841. Patients with the minor alleles of rs1491974 and rs10513398 were almost 3 times more likely to have ≥70% final platelet aggregation in response to 5 μM ADP while patients with the variant allele of rs3732765 and rs10935841 were 2 times more likely to have ≥70% maximal platelet aggregation following 10 μM ADP stimulation. SNPs rs1491974 and rs10513398 are located in the promoter and exon 1/intron 1 (IVS-1) boundary of the gene, respectively, and are in complete LD (Supplementary Figure 2). Similarly, SNPs rs3732765 and rs10935841 are located in IVS-1 and display complete LD (Supplementary Figure 2). There is a moderate degree of LD between these two SNP groups. The reason that we found an association with 5 μM ADP-stimulated final aggregation may result from the low number of patients having ≥70% aggregation in this group (58 or 14%, Table 2). It is also possible that the lower agonist concentration (5 μM ADP) induces COX and TxA2-dependent platelet aggregation, which is sensitive to aspirin, while the higher agonist concentration (10 μM ADP) could stimulate other activation pathways (Cattaneo, 2004; Cattaneo, 2007; Lordkipanidze et al., 2007).

Low RPR was associated with five P2RY12 SNPs, rs7615865, rs1388623, rs1388622, rs7634096 and rs7637803, in the study population. Patients with the minor alleles of these SNPs were more likely to have <70% maximal platelet aggregation in response to 10 μM ADP. These polymorphic spots also reside in IVS-1 and represent two LD groups (Supplementary Figure 2). All SNPs we found related with the platelet aggregation in response to ADP are spread along a region between promoter and 44 kb long IVS-1 (Supplementary Table 2) which makes the difference between long and short mRNAs. This region can have a regulatory function for the expression of P2RY12 receptor protein and thereby, any sequence change can alter the number of P2RY12 receptors on platelet surface which in turn may affect the platelet activity. In a recent study, it was shown that three ht-SNPs (Haplotype-tagging) locating in the promoter and IVS-1 of the P2RY12 gene were associated with almost 2-fold risk of developing restenosis after PCI (Rudez et al., 2008). One of the ht-SNPs linked, rs6787801, is in complete LD with rs1491974 and rs10513398 and moderate LD with rs3732765 and rs10935841 (Supplementary Figure 2). These data also suggest that nucleotide changes in the regulatory sequences of P2RY12 may be associated with restenosis through the over-expression of receptor resulting in increased platelet activity.

An association of P2RY1 polymorphism rs1065776 with a >3-fold increase of aspirin resistance in Caucasian male CAD patients was reported by Jefferson et al. (Jefferson et al., 2005). More patients with the minor allele of this SNP displayed ≥20% maximal platelet aggregation in response to AA stimulation. Although these patients were a subset of our study group, this SNP was not significantly associated with high RPR in the larger population. The difference in size and gender between two study populations may have affected the statistical outcome. Moreover, the current statistical approach adjusted the analysis by age, gender, and smoking status together; the prior subanalysis adjusted for age, HDL, and diabetes mellitus individually (Jefferson et al., 2005). On the other hand, five P2RY1 SNPs, rs1439010, rs1371097, rs701265, rs12497578, and rs2312265, were found to be associated with stimulated TxB2 level in our study. Minor alleles of these polymorphisms were associated with <1 ng/mL stimulated TxB2. Association was always evident without and with single and multi-confounder adjustments (age, gender, and smoking). One of these SNPs, rs701265 (A1622G), has been reported to be associated with increased platelet aggregation in response to ADP in subjects carrying the minor allele (Hetherington et al., 2005). A recent study reported that CAD patients homozygous for the minor allele of rs701265 had 8.5-fold higher risk of having ≥20% platelet aggregation in response to AA (Lordkipanidze et al., 2011). Interestingly, no increase was found in ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation and urinary 11-dTxB2 levels in those patients (Lordkipanidze et al., 2011). The five P2RY1 SNPs reside in a variety of regions in the gene. SNPs rs1439010 and rs1371097 are in the promoter, while rs701265 is located in the single exon of P2RY1. SNPs rs12497578 and rs2312265 are downstream of the gene. They are all in complete LD except rs12497578 which shows moderate LD (Supplementary Figure 1). In addition to COX-1 inhibition by aspirin, further decrease in TxB2 production could result from the repressed or defective expression of the P2RY1 receptor, leading to decreased amplification, which could explain the lower percentage of moderate RPR by the measurement of TxB2 (23% versus 31% by AA-induced aggregation). Further functional studies of these polymorphisms would be needed to elucidate a functional role of the P2RY1 receptor in TxA2-mediated aggregation.

Recurrent MI was reported in 25% of our study population. These patients had significantly higher AA-stimulated platelet aggregation than patients with single MI (p-values <0.05). In addition, there was a potential association between recurrent MI and P2RY12 SNP rs4603933 based on a recessive genetic model (OR=0.05, 95% CI=0.01–0.4, p-value<0.001, FDR=0.009) (data not shown). However, the number of patients homozygous for the minor allele (2% of the study population) was not enough to make a conclusion for this association. Finally, patients carrying or homozygous for the variant allele of P2RY12 SNP rs11715892 had lower levels of HDL cholesterol than patients homozygous for the wild alleles (mean±SD, 42±1 mg/dL versus 38±1 mg/dL, difference=−0.10, 95% CI=−0.16–0.04, p-value=0.002, FDR=0.065) (data not shown). Interestingly, another ADP receptor, P2RY13, was recently shown as the main regulator of hepatic HDL endocytosis in mice (Jacquet et al., 2005; Fabre et al., 2010). An antagonist of the P2RY12 receptor (antithrombotic agent cangrelor) was also shown to stimulate P2RY13-mediated HDL endocytosis in cultured cells and perfused mouse liver but not in P2RY13 knockout mice (Jacquet et al., 2005; Fabre et al., 2010).

In conclusion, we found associations of P2RY1 and P2RY12 SNPs with on-aspirin platelet reactivity in patients with CAD. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study to date of platelet function and the SNP number analyzed in both P2RY1 and P2RY12 genes. Further evaluation of the associated polymorphisms by genetic and functional studies may be needed to reveal additional information about the mechanisms involving P2RY1 and P2RY12 receptors.

There are certain limitations to this study. A risk of false positive findings is present due to our modest population size (N=423). The expression levels of P2RY1 and P2RY12 were not assessed. The high residual platelet activity observed in response to ADP may also reflect basal high sensitivity to ADP, but basal samples were not available. These genotyping results should be replicated in a separate patient population.

Supplementary Material

Supp Fig S1
Supp Fig S2
Supp Table S1
Supp Table S2

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health SCCOR grant P50 HL081011 (Roy Silverstein, MD; Project 2, KKM) and P50 HL077107 (QKW). We would like to thank Teresa Kaldus, Mary Ann Verbic, and Ying Hu for the technical assistance, and Marlene Goormastic for the guidance with database.

Footnotes

Disclosures

Dr. Bhatt receives research grants from Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ethicon, Medtronic, Sanofi Aventis, and The Medicines Company.

References

  1. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2009;373:1849–1860. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60503-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong PCJ, Leadbeater PD, Chan MV, Kirkby NS, Jakubowski JA, Mitchell JA, Warner TD. In the presence of strong P2Y12 receptor blockade, aspirin provides little additional inhibition of platelet aggregation. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2011;9:552–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04160.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayyanathan K, Naylor SL, Kunapuli SP. Structural characterization and fine chromosomal mapping of the human P2Y1 purinergic receptor gene (P2RY1) Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics. 1996;22:419–424. doi: 10.1007/BF02369897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger JS, Brown DL, Becker RC. Low-dose aspirin in patients with stable cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Medicine. 2008;121:43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cattaneo M. Aspirin and clopidogrel: efficacy, safety, and the issue of drug resistance. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2004;24:1980–1987. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000145980.39477.a9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cattaneo M. Resistance to antiplatelet drugs: molecular mechanisms and laboratory detection. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2007;5(Suppl 1):230–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Censarek P, Freidel K, Udelhoven M, Ku SJ, Hohlfeld T, Meyer-Kirchrath J, Schrör K, Weber AA. Cyclooxygenase COX-2a, a novel COX-2 mRNA variant, in platelets from patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2004;92:925–928. doi: 10.1160/TH04-05-0302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen M. Antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention: a critical review of the 2007 AHA/ACC/SCAI guidelines and beyond. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2009;74:579–597. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fabre AC, Malaval C, Ben Addi A, Verdier C, Pons V, Serhan N, Lichtenstein L, Combes G, Huby T, Briand F, Collet X, Nijstad N, Tietge UJ, Robaye B, Perret B, Boeynaems JM, Martinez LO. P2Y13 receptor is critical for reverse cholesterol transport. Hepatology. 2010;52:1477–1483. doi: 10.1002/hep.23897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fontana P, Dupont A, Gandrille S, Bachelot-Loza C, Reny JL, Aiach M, Gaussem P. Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation is associated with P2Y12 gene sequence variations in healthy subjects. Circulation. 2003a;108:989–995. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000085073.69189.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fontana P, Gaussem P, Aiach M, Fiessinger JN, Emmerich J, Reny JL. P2Y12 H2 haplotype is associated with peripheral arterial disease: a case-control study. Circulation. 2003b;108:2971–2973. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000106904.80795.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gasparyan AY, Watson T, Lip GY. The role of aspirin in cardiovascular prevention: implications of aspirin resistance. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;51:1829–1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodman T, Ferro A, Sharma P. Pharmacogenetics of aspirin resistance: a comprehensive systematic review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2008;66:222–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03183.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gum PA, Kottke-Marchant K, Poggio ED, Gurm H, Welsh PA, Brooks L, Sapp SK, Topol EJ. Profile and prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Cardiology. 2001;88:230–235. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01631-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gum PA, Kottke-Marchant K, Welsh PA, White J, Topol EJ. A prospective, blinded determination of the natural history of aspirin resistance among stable patients with cardiovascular disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2003;41:961–965. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)03014-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hayward CPM, Moffat KA, Raby A, Israels S, Plumhoff E, Flynn G, Zehnder JL. Development of North American consensus guidelines for medical laboratories that perform and interpret platelet function testing using light transmission aggregometry. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2010;134:955–963. doi: 10.1309/AJCP9V3RRVNZMKDS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hetherington SL, Singh RK, Lodwick D, Thompson JR, Goodall AH, Samani NJ. Dimorphism in the P2Y1 ADP receptor gene is associated with increased platelet activation response to ADP. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2005;25:252–257. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000148708.44691.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hollopeter G, Jantzen HM, Vincent D, Li G, England L, Ramakrishnan V, Yang RB, Nurden P, Julius D, Conley PB. Identification of the platelet ADP receptor targeted by antithrombotic drugs. Nature. 2001;409:202–207. doi: 10.1038/35051599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacquet S, Malaval C, Martinez LO, Sak K, Rolland C, Perez C, Nauze M, Champagne E, Tercé F, Gachet C, Perret B, Collet X, Boeynaems JM, Barbaras R. The nucleotide receptor P2Y13 is a key regulator of hepatic high-density lipoprotein (HDL) endocytosis. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2005;62:2508–2515. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5194-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jefferson BK, Foster JH, McCarthy JJ, Ginsburg G, Parker A, Kottke-Marchant K, Topol EJ. Aspirin resistance and a single gene. American Journal of Cardiololgy. 2005;95:805–808. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Keating BJ, Tischfield S, Murray SS, Bhangale T, Price TS, Glessner JT, Galver L, Barrett JC, Grant SFA, Farlow DN, Chandrupatla HR, Hansen M, Ajmal S, Papanicolaou GJ, Guo Y, Li M, DerOhannessian S, de Bakker PIW, Bailey SD, Montpetit A, Edmondson AC, Taylor K, Gai X, Wang SS, Fornage M, Shaikh T, Groop L, Boehnke M, Hall AS, Hattersleyn AT, Frackelton E, Patterson N, Chiang CWK, Kim CE, Fabsitz RR, Ouwehand W, Price AL, Munroe P, Caulfield M, Drake T, Boerwinkle E, Reich D, Whitehead AS, Cappola TP, Samani NJ, Lusis AJ, Schadt E, Wilson JG, Koenig W, McCarthy MI, Kathiresan S, Gabriel SB, Hakonarson H, Anand SS, Reilly M, Engert JC, Nickerson DA, Rader DJ, JN, FitzGerald GA. Concept, design and implementation of a cardiovascular gene-centric 50 k SNP array for large-scale genomic association studies. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krasopoulos G, Brister SJ, Beattie WS, Buchanan MR. Aspirin “resistance” and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal. 2008;336:195–198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39430.529549.BE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leon C, Vial C, Cazenave JP, Gachet C. Cloning and sequencing of a human cDNA encoding endothelial P2Y1 purinoceptor. Gene. 1996;171:295–297. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(96)00027-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lordkipanidze M, Pharand C, Schampaert E, Turgeon J, Palisaitis DA, Diodati JG. A comparison of six major platelet function tests to determine the prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with stable coronary artery disease. European Heart Journal. 2007;28:1702–1708. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lordkipanidze M, Diodati JG, Palisaitis DA, Schampaert E, Turgeon J, Pharand C. Genetic determinants of response to aspirin: Appraisal of 4 candidate genes. Thrombosis Research. 2011;128:47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Murugesan G, Aboudola S, Szpurka H, Verbic MA, Maciejewski JP, Tubbs RR, Hsi ED. Identification of the JAK2 V617F mutation in chronic myeloproliferative disorders using FRET probes and melting curve analysis. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2006;125:625–633. doi: 10.1309/TK0X-L917-XK2V-LRPQ. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Patrono C, Rocca B. Aspirin: promise and resistance in the new millennium. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28:25–32. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.160481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics; 2006;38:904–909. doi: 10.1038/ng1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rozalski M, Boncler M, Luzak B, Watala C. Genetic factors underlying differential blood platelet sensitivity to inhibitors. Pharmacological Reports. 2005;57:1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rudez G, Pons D, Leebeek F, Monraats P, Schrevel M, Zwinderman A, de Winter R, Tio R, Doevendans P, Jukema W, de Maat M. Platelet receptor P2RY12 haplotypes predict restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. Human Mutation. 2008;29:375–380. doi: 10.1002/humu.20641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smyth SS, Woulfe DS, Weitz JI, Gachet C, Conley PB, Goodman SG, Roe MT, Kuliopulos A, Moliterno DJ, French PA, Steinhubl SR, Becker RC. G-protein-coupled receptors as signaling targets for antiplatelet therapy. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2009;29:449–457. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.176388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT, 3rd, Fry ET, DeLago A, Wilmer C, Topol EJ. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of American Medical Association. 2002;288:2411–2420. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.19.2411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Volonte C, D’Ambrosi N. Membrane compartments and purinergic signalling: the purinome, a complex interplay among ligands, degrading enzymes, receptors and transporters. FEBS Journal. 2009;276:318–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06793.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;345:494–502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Fig S1
Supp Fig S2
Supp Table S1
Supp Table S2

RESOURCES