Skip to main content
Case Reports in Pathology logoLink to Case Reports in Pathology
. 2012 Mar 22;2012:491984. doi: 10.1155/2012/491984

Primary Leiomyosarcoma of Breast in an Adolescent Girl: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Swapnil Ulhas Rane 1, Charu Batra 1, Uma Nahar Saikia 1,*
PMCID: PMC3420689  PMID: 22953134

Abstract

Leiomyosarcoma of the breast is a rare neoplasm, primarily reported in older women. Only 44 cases have been reported in world literature and to the best of our knowledge, no case has been reported from India till date. We report a case of primary breast leiomyosarcoma in an adolescent girl who underwent a lumpectomy for rapidly increasing lump in the left breast. Here we report the histological findings and immunohistochemical profile of this entity, along with a review of existing literature.

1. Introduction

Primary sarcomas of the breast are rare tumors accounting for less than 1% of all breast neoplasms, just a handful of which are leiomyosarcoma. This tumor occurs usually in postmenopausal women, with most of the reported cases being between the age of fifty and eighty years [135]. Its occurrence in very young girls [8, 20] is extremely rare and may be clinically mistaken for fibroadenoma. In this paper, we present the clinical features of an adolescent girl with primary leiomyosarcoma of the breast, its pathological features, and an up-to-date review of literature on the topic.

2. Case Report

2.1. Clinical Presentation and Examination

A 19-year-old adolescent girl presented with a rapidly increasing, painless mass in the left breast for 6-month duration. On clinical examination, the mass measured 8 cm in diameter, was well defined, lobulated, firm, and mobile with the overlying skin and nipple-areola being normal. No axillary lymph nodes were palpable. The patient did not have any family history of breast cancer or any other comorbidity. An ultrasound examination of the breast identified the mass to be well circumscribed, oval and was diagnosed as likely to be a fibroadenoma. Systemic physical, radiological, and ultrasound examination did not identify any suspicious mass in any other part of the body. The patient underwent an excision of the breast lump with the aim of diagnosis and relief of symptoms.

2.2. Pathological Findings

Grossly, the specimen composed of single, large, globular, and well-encapsulated mass measuring 7 cm in diameter (Figures 1(a), 1(b)). The mass was pearly white in color on both the outer surface as well as the cut surface with areas of whorling. No areas of hemorrhage, cystic degeneration, or necrosis were noted grossly. However, focal areas of myxoid change were seen. Microscopically, (Figures 1(c), 1(d), and 1(e)) the tumor was well-circumscribed, well-encapsulated, and composed of spindle cells arranged as intersecting long fascicles in a collagenous background. Individual tumor cells were moderately pleomorphic with round to oval nuclei, vesicular chromatin, and moderate amount of eosinophilic spindled cytoplasm. Binucleation and multinucleation were frequently noted, as was mitotic activity (20–25/10 high power field). Few myxoid areas were noted with interspersed thin-walled blood vessels and microscopic areas of necrosis. No epithelial component was noted in any part of the tumor. The mass was completely excised with a rim of normal breast tissue containing terminal duct lobular units surrounded by mild fibrosis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Gross photographs showing the external aspect (a) and cut surface (b) of the specimen showing a well-circumscribed and encapsulated mass with a thin rim of breast parenchyma surrounding it. The tumor is homogenous, whitish with areas of myxoid change. (c, d, e) Progressive increasing magnification of histology (40x, 100x and 400x) showing the well-encapsulated mass composed of intersecting fascicles of spindle cells with frequent mitoses. (f) Peroxidase-based immunohistochemistry for smooth muscle actin (SMA) showing diffuse, strong cytoplasmic positivity.

Immunohistochemistry (Figure 1(f)) performed by the peroxidase technique showed the tumor cells to be strongly positive for smooth muscle actin and vimentin, while they were negative for pan-cytokeratin and desmin.

3. Discussion

Breast sarcomas are rare tumors accounting for about 0.5–1.0% of all breast neoplasms. Of these, cystosarcoma phylloides is the most common neoplasm, while only a handful of cases have been reported in the literature to be primary leiomyosarcoma of breast [135]. A comparison of clinicopathological features of primary leiomyosarcoma of breast reported in the English literature till date is presented in Table 1. In the largest series on breast sarcomas from the Mayo clinic, spread over a span of 90 years (1910–2000), Adem et al. [1] reported twenty five cases of primary breast sarcomas, of which only two were leiomyosarcoma. In the largest series on primary breast sarcomas from India, none of the 19 cases reported was a leiomyosarcoma [41]. Most of the patients reported till date of primary breast leiomyosarcoma have been postmenopausal, typically in the six-eighth decade. However, our patient is one of the two reported cases [8] of a young girl in her late teens to be diagnosed with a primary breast sarcoma. As with other sarcomas, prior chemotherapy for either a primary breast carcinoma or any other malignancy is a risk factor reported in the literature [6]. The exact cell of origin of this tumor is still debated with origin from smooth muscle of blood vessels, or that of the nipple areola complex and myofibroblasts undergoing myoid transformation being candidate histogenetic mechanisms [3, 25].

Table 1.

Comparison of clinicopathological variables of all the cases of primary leiomyosarcoma of breast reported in the English literature.

Author Year Age/Sex size (cm) Mitosis (/10hpf) Treatment Ct/Rt Final followup
Haagensen [35] 1971 77/F 8 very frequent SM Alive, 14 years
Pardo Mindan et al. [25] 1974 49/F 7 16 SM Alive, 6 months
Barnes and Pietruszka [36] 1977 55/F 3 10 SM Died 4 years 4 months later with basilar arterythrombosis
Hernandez [13] 1978 53/M 4 15 MRM Alive, 1 year 2 months
Chen et al. [4] 1981 59/F 5.6 3 SM Alive, 15 years
Callery et al. [37] 1984 56/F 2 SM Alive, 39 months
Callery et al. [37] 1984 54/F 3 SM Alive, 53 months
Yatsuka et al. [38] 1984 56/F 1.5 21 RM Alive, 4 years 7 months
Gobardhan [9] 1984 50/F 9 5 MRM Alive, 2 years
Nielsen [24] 1984 24/F 1.5 (1962) 1 (1965) 2 (1966) 2, 8, 14 WLE (1962), SM (1965) Died 20 years later
Yamashina [33] 1987 62/F 2.5 11 SM Alive, 2 years 2 months
Arista-Nasr et al. [2] 1989 50/F 4.5 (1980), 2.3 (1986) 4 WLE Alive, 6 years 4 months
Parham et al. [26] 1992 52/F 3 29 SM Alive, 6 months
Lonsdale and Widdison [21] 1992 60/F 2, 4 (18 mths later) 10 SM Alive, 3 months,
Waterworth et al. [34] 1992 58/F 4 10 WLE + AC Alive, 1 year
Wei et al. [16] 1993 36/F 4 MRM Died 14 months later
Boscaino et al. [39] 1994 56/F 2.5/4 2 WLE (1981)/RM (1984) Alive, 9 years
Boscaino et al. [39] 1994 45/F 1.9 (1985)/2.2 (1989) 2 E (1985)/WLE(1989) Alive, 40 months, post wide local excision
Levy et al. [19] 1995 35/F 4 2 SM Alive, 6 months
Falconieri et al. [7] 1997 83/F 6 20 RM Alive, 10 months
Falconieri et al. [7] 1997 86/F 8 11 SM Alive, 8 months
Ugras et al. [31] 1997 47/F 2 3 SM Alive, 1 year 6 months
González-Palacios [10] 1998 62/F 3 10 SM Alive, 17 years
Gupta et al. [12] 2000 80/F 6.5 5–8 SM + AC Alive, 2 years
Székely et al. [30] 2001 73/F 4.8 20–22 SM Alive, 1 year
Kusama et al. [17] 2002 55/F 0.5/- few WLE (1996, 1997)/SM (1998) Alive, 4 years 8 months
Shinto et al. [28] 2002 59/F 12 19 SM Ct Alive, 8 months
Wei et al. [16] 2003 52/F 4 22 WLE Alive, 3 months
Markaki et al. [22] 2003 42/F 14 50 MRM Ct Alive, 3 years
Markaki et al. [22] 2003 65/F 5,2 10 E Alive, 18 months
Liang et al. [20] 2003 25/F 4 5 E Alive, 32 months
Adem et al. [1] 2004 67/F 2 E Died 7 months later
Adem et al. [1] 2004 55/F 4 SM Died 77 months later
Jayaram et al. [15] 2004 55/F 12 MRM Local recurrence
Lee et al. [18] 2004 44/F 3 6–12 SM Alive, 13 months
Lee et al. [18] 2004 52/F 4.5 6–12 SM Alive, 17 months
Stafyla et al. [29] 2004 53/F 23 MRM Rt Alive, 2 years
Munitiz et al. [23] 2004 58/F 4 14 MRM Alive, 1 year
Gupta [11] 2006 37/F 8 15 WLE Alive, 36 months
Vu et al. [32] 2006 -/F 23 SM Alive, 10 months
De la Pena and Wapnir [6] 2008 50/F 3.2 SM Alive, 11 months
Wong et al. [40] 2008 52/F 1.5 7 SM Alive, 4 days
Cobanoglu et al. [5] 2009 64/F 3.5 12 MRM Alive, 22 months
Fujita et al. [8] 2010 18/F 7.2 10 SM Rt Alive, 5 years
Present Case 2011 19/F 7 20–25 WLE Alive, 3years

Ct: Chemotherapy, Rt: Radiotherapy, SM: Simple Mastectomy, RM: Radical Mastectomy, MRM: Modified Radical Mastectomy.

There is no clear consensus on the best treatment modality. However, the basic aim of treatment should be a complete excision with negative margins. Most cases reported have undergone mastectomy; however cases treated by lumpectomy have been reported albeit with a marginally higher incidence of recurrence and metastases [2, 4]. Prognosis is determined primarily by the adequacy of surgical resection. Although, there is no definite consensus on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, most patients reported till date have done well without any chemotherapy or radiotherapy, at least in the initial few years (see Table 1). The benefit of chemotherapy or radiation in preventing a recurrence many years later needs to be balanced by the risk of second malignancy. Most patients undergo mastectomy or at least wide local excision, as in our case. There is probably no role for axillary dissection, as there is no reason to believe that leiomyosarcomas follow a lymphatic route of dissemination. Even in cases which had palpable axillary nodes, axillary node dissection did not show any evidence of metastasis (Table 1).

In conclusion, leiomyosarcoma of the breast is a rare entity with patients typically being in the 5th−7th decade; however it can rarely occur in younger patients as in our case. Morphologically it can be suspected by the typical histological features of circumscription, high cellularity and being composed of fusiform spindle cells having blunt end nuclei. Confirmation by an immunohistochemical profile of smooth muscle actin, vimentin, and desmin positivity is helpful; however, cases negative for some of these immunostains especially desmin have been reported. Demonstration of myofilaments on electron microscopy can help in those cases.

Disclosure

The authors declare that this paper has not been published or being considered for publication in any other journal prior to submitting to Case Reports in Pathology. The authors further declare that they have no financial or nonfinancial competing interests related to this report.

Consent

A written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the paper.

References

  • 1.Adem C, Reynolds C, Ingle JN, Nascimento AG. Primary breast sarcoma: clinicopathologic series from the Mayo Clinic and review of the literature. British Journal of Cancer. 2004;91(2):237–241. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arista-Nasr J, Gonzalez-Gomez I, Angeles-Angeles A, Illanes-Baz E, Brandt-Brandt H, Larriva-Sahd J. Primary recurrent leiomyosarcoma of the breast. Case report with ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study and review of the literature. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1989;92(4):500–505. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/92.4.500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cameron HM, Hamperl H, Warambo W. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast originating from myothelium (myoepithelium) Journal of Pathology. 1974;114(2):89–92. doi: 10.1002/path.1711140206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen KTK, Kuo TT, Hoffmann KD. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast. A case of long survival and late hepatic metastasis. Cancer. 1981;47(7):1883–1886. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810401)47:7<1883::aid-cncr2820470728>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cobanoglu B, Sezer M, Karabulut P, Ozer S, Murat A. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the breast. Breast Journal. 2009;15(4):423–425. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00752.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De la Pena J, Wapnir I. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast in a patient with a 10-year-history of cyclophosphamide exposure: a case report. Cases Journal. 2008;1(1):p. 301. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-1-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Falconieri G, Della Libera D, Zanconati F, Bittesini L. Leiomyosarcoma of the female breast: report of two new cases and a review of the literature. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1997;108(1):19–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fujita N, Kimura R, Yamamura J, Akazawa K, Kasugai T, Tsukamoto F. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast: a case report and review of the literature about therapeutic management. Breast. 2011;20(5):389–393. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gobardhan AB. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the breast. Netherlands Journal of Surgery. 1984;36(4):116–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.González-Palacios F. Leiomyosarcoma of the female breast. American journal of clinical pathology. 1998;109(5):650–651. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/109.5.650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gupta RK. Needle aspiration cytology and immunohistologic findings in a case of leiomyosarcoma of the breast. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2007;35(4):254–256. doi: 10.1002/dc.20618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gupta RK, Kenwright D, Naran S, Lallu S, Fauck R. Fine needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of leiomyosarcoma of the breast: a case report. Acta Cytologica. 2000;44(6):1101–1105. doi: 10.1159/000328606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hernandez FJ. Leiomyosarcoma of male breast originating in the nipple. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 1978;2(3):299–304. doi: 10.1097/00000478-197809000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hussien M, Sivananthan S, Anderson N, Shiels A, Tracey N, Odling-Smee GW. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the breast: diagnosis, management and outcome. A report of a new case and review of literature. Breast. 2001;10(6):530–534. doi: 10.1054/brst.2000.0276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jayaram G, Jayalakshmi P, Yip CH. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast: report of a case with fine needle aspiration cytologic, histologic and immunohistochemical features. Acta Cytologica. 2005;49(6):656–660. doi: 10.1159/000326256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wei XJ, Hiotis K, Garcia R, Levine PH. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast: a difficult diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2003;29(3):172–178. doi: 10.1002/dc.10359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kusama R, Fujimori M, Hama Y, et al. Stromal sarcoma of the breast with leiomyosarcomatous pattern. Pathology International. 2002;52(8):534–539. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2002.01386.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee J, Li S, Torbenson M, et al. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast: a pathologic and comparative genomic hybridization study of two cases. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics. 2004;149(1):53–57. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4608(03)00286-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Levy RD, Degiannis E, Obers V, Saadia R. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast: a case report. South African Journal of Surgery. 1995;33(1):15–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liang WC, Sickle-Santanello BJ, Nims TA, Accetta PA. Primary Leiomyosarcoma of the breast: a case report with review of the literature. Breast Journal. 2003;9(6):494–496. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09613.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lonsdale RN, Widdison A. Leiomyosarcoma of the nipple. Histopathology. 1992;20(6):537–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1992.tb01042.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Markaki S, Sotiropoulou M, Hanioti C, Lazaris D. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2003;106(2):233–236. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00226-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Munitiz V, Rios A, Canovas J, et al. Primitive leiomyosarcoma of the breast: case report and review of the literature. Breast. 2004;13(1):72–76. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2003.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nielsen BB. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast with late dissemination. Virchows Archiv. 1984;403(3):241–245. doi: 10.1007/BF00694900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pardo Mindan J, Garcia Julian G, EizaguirreAltuna M. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast. Report of a case. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1974;62(4):477–480. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/62.4.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Parham DM, Robertson AJ, Hussein KA, Davidson AIG. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast; cytological and histological features, with a review of the literature. Cytopathology. 1992;3(4):245–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1992.tb00514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pollard SG, Marks PV, Temple LN, Thompson HH. Breast sarcoma. A clinicopathologic review of 25 cases. Cancer. 1990;66(5):941–944. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900901)66:5<941::aid-cncr2820660522>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shinto O, Yashiro M, Yamada N, et al. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the breast: report of a case. Surgery Today. 2002;32(8):716–719. doi: 10.1007/s005950200133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stafyla VK, Gauvin JM, Farley DR. A 53-year-old woman with a leiomyosarcoma of the breast. Current Surgery. 2004;61(6):572–575. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Székely E, Madaras L, Kulka J, Járay B, Nagy L. Leiomyosarcoma of the female breast. Pathology and Oncology Research. 2001;7(2):151–153. doi: 10.1007/BF03032583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ugras S, Dilek ON, Karaayvaz M, Dilek H, Peker O, Barut I. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the breast. Surgery Today. 1997;27(11):1082–1085. doi: 10.1007/BF02385794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vu LT, Luce J, Knudson MM. Image of the month. Archives of Surgery. 2006;141(12):1263–1264. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.12.1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yamashina M. Primary leiomyosarcoma in the breast. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1987;17(1):71–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Waterworth PD, Gompertz RHK, Hennessy C, Henry JA, Lennard TWJ. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the breast. British Journal of Surgery. 1992;79(2):169–170. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Haagenson CD. Diseases of the Breast. 2nd edition. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: W.B. Saunders; 1971. Nonepithelial neoplasms of the breast; pp. 299–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Barnes L, Pietruszka M. Sarcomas of the breast. A clinicopathologic analysis of ten cases. Cancer. 1977;40(4):1577–1585. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197710)40:4<1577::aid-cncr2820400430>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Callery CD, Rosen PP, Kinne DW. Sarcoma of the breast. A study of 32 patients with reappraisal of classification and therapy. Annals of Surgery. 1985;201(4):527–532. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198504000-00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yatsuka K, Mihara S, Isobe M. Leiomyosarcoma of the breast. A case report and an electron microscopic study. Japanese Journal of Surgery. 1984;14(6):494–498. doi: 10.1007/BF02469792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boscaino A, Ferrara G, Orabona P, Donofrio V, Staibano S, De Rosa G. Smooth muscle tumor of the breast: clinicopathologic features of two cases. Tumori. 1994;80(3):241–245. doi: 10.1177/030089169408000316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Luh SP, Wong LC, Huang PC, Huang CS. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the nipple-areola complex: report of a case and review of literature. Journal of Zhejiang University B. 2008;9(2):109–113. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0720246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pandey M, Mathew A, Abraham EK, Rajan B. Primary sarcoma of the breast. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2004;87(3):121–125. doi: 10.1002/jso.20110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Case Reports in Pathology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES