Abstract
Background
The axillary lymph node status is the most important determinant of prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a safe alternative for axillary clearance with an equal efficacy limiting the morbidity caused by axillary clearance.
Patient and methods
From May 1996 till September 2009, 523 clinically node negative, early breast cancer patients attending our clinic at All India Institute of Medical Sciences were included in the study. They underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy by either combined technique or blue dye alone. All patients irrespective of the axillary status underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).
Results
Of 523 patients, 267 underwent combined technique of sentinel node mapping and 256 underwent blue dye technique alone. The identification rate of sentinel lymph node was 94.3% (253/267) for combined technique and 87.8% (225/256) for blue dye alone. Of 523 patients SLN was identified in 478 patients. The identification rate was 91.3%. The sensitivity = 91.5% (141/154), false negative = 8.4% (13/154), negative predictive value = 96.14% (324/337), and accuracy being 97.2% (465/478).
Conclusion
Sentinel node mapping is a simple and safe technique of identifying the axillary node involvement. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with less arm oedema and shoulder morbidity compared to ALND. However, the results of long term effects of sentinel node approach on tumor recurrence or patient survival are awaited.
Keywords: Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Axillary lymph node dissection, Axillary node sampling, Lymphatic mapping, Early breast cancer, Immuohistochemistry
References
- 1.Nemoto T., Vana J., Bedwani R.N., Baker H.W., McGregor F.H., Murphy G.P. Management and survival of female breastcancer: results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons. Cancer. 1980;45:2917–2924. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800615)45:12<2917::AID-CNCR2820451203>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carter C.L., Allen C., Henson D.E. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer. 1989;63:181–187. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Orr R.K. The impact of prophylactic axillary node dissection on breast cancer survival — a Bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:109–116. doi: 10.1007/s10434-999-0109-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sanghani M., Balk E.M., Cady B. Impact of axillary lymph node dissection on breast cancer outcome in clinically node negative patients: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Cancer. 2009;115(8):1613–20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hughes R.J., Jones C., Holland P.A., et al. Prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis by size and grade of tumor — an aid for the discussion of axillary surgery in patients with operable disease. Eur J Cancer. 2007;5:21. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chetty U., Jack W., Prescott R.J., et al. A management of the axilla in operable breast cancer treated by breast conservation: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2000;87:163–169. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Forrest A.P.M., Everington D., McDonald C.C., et al. The Edinburgh randomized trial of axillary sampling or clearance after mastectomy. Br J Surg. 1995;82:1504–1508. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800821118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Axelsson C.K., Mouridsen H.T., Zedeler K. Axillary dissection of level I and II lymph nodes is important in breast cancer classification. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28A:1415–1418. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90534-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cabanas R.M. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer. 1997;39:456–466. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197702)39:2<456::AID-CNCR2820390214>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Giuliano A.E., Kirgan D.M., Guenther J.M., Morton D.L. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenec-tomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1994;220:391–401. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199409000-00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Krag D.N., Weaver D.L., Alex J.C., Fairbank J.T. Surgical re-section and radiolocalisation of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using gamma probe. Surg Oncol. 1993;2:335–339. doi: 10.1016/0960-7404(93)90064-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Albertini J.J., Lyman G.H., Cox C., Yeatman T., Balducci L., Ku N., et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer. JAMA. 1996;276:1818–1822. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.22.1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Giuliano A.E., et al. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2345. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mansel R.E., Fallowfield L., Kissin M., Goyal A., et al. Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: The ALMANAC trial. J National Cancer Inst. 2006;98(9):599–609. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krag D., Anderson S.J., Julian T.B., et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel lymph node resection and conventional axillary lymph node dissection in patients with clinically node negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;10:881–888. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70278-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goyal A, Mansel RE, Douglas-Jones A, Woods V, et al. Intraoperative assessment of sentinel lymph node using real time quantitative PCR versus delayed assessment of sentinel lymph node: a cost-effectiveness model. 30th San Antonio Breast Cancer Conference, 2007; Abstract 3012.
- 17.Schem C, Maass N, Bauerschlag DO, et al. One step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) for intraoperative detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. 30th San Antonio Breast Cancer Conference, 2007; Abstract 3029.
- 18.Morton D.L., WEn D.R., Wong J.H., Economus J.S., Cagle L.A., et al. Technical details of intra-operative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 1992;127:392–399. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420040034005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reynolds C., Mick R., et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy with metastases. Can Axillary dissection be avoided in some patients with Breast cancer? J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(6):1720–1726. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim T., Giuliano A.E., Lyman G.H. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage breast Carcinoma-A meta-analysis. Cancer. 2006;106:4–16. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ludwig J.Ueber kurschlusswege der lymphbahnen und ihre beziehungen zur lymphogen krebsmetastasierung Path Microbiol 19622532914467194 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martin R., et al. Intradermal isotope injection is superior to intramammary in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer. Surgery. 2001;130:432. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.116412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McMaster K., et al. Dermal injection of radioactive colloid is superior to peritumoral injection for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: results of the multiinstitutional study. Ann Surg. 2001;233:767. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200105000-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weiser M.R., Montgomery L.L., et al. Is routine intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer worthwhile? Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:651–655. doi: 10.1007/s10434-000-0651-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.McGuckin M.A., Cummings M.C., Walsh M.D., Hohn B.G., Bennett I.C., Wright R.G. Occult axillary node metastases in breast cancer: their detection and prognostic significance. Br J Cancer. 1996;73(1):88–95. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Boer M., Deurzen C.H.M., Dijck J.A.A.M., Borm G.F., Diest P.J., et al. Micrometastases or isolated tumor cells and the out-come of breast cancer. N Eng J Med. 2009;361:653–663. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
