LETTER
We read with great interest the article by Andrade et al. (1) describing the predominance of sequence type 258 (ST258) among KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in Brazilian hospitals. Recently, we conducted a similar study that evaluated the genetic relationship among KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae isolates from Brazilian hospitals.
A total of 34 KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from 13 distinct hospitals located at seven Brazilian states during the period of 2008 to 2010 and referred to Laboratório Alerta, UNIFESP, for further characterization. A single isolate per patient was analyzed. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed and interpreted using the CLSI agar dilution (M100-S22) method for all agents except polymyxin B, for which the EUCAST criteria for colistin were applied (2, 4). The presence of the blaKPC-2 gene was confirmed by PCR, followed by sequencing (5). Genetic relationship among KPC-2-producing isolates was assessed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), using SpeI as the restriction enzyme (3, 7).
The antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the isolates is presented in Table 1. All isolates were resistant to ertapenem, while 44.1% and 23.5% remained susceptible to imipenem and meropenem, respectively. Among the 34 KPC-2 producers, seven STs were observed, including the new ST ST617 (Table 1). In contrast to the results reported by Andrade et al. (1), ST258 itself was not identified among the isolates studied, but STs related to clonal complex 258 (CC258), ST437, and ST11 were observed. ST437 was the most frequently detected ST (18 isolates; 52.9%) and was isolated from seven medical centers in two Brazilian states, while ST11 was the most widely distributed. ST11 was detected in 10 (29.4%) isolates collected from eight hospitals located in five distinct states (Table 1). Interestingly, ST11 isolates showed a greater degree of variability by PFGE (six PFGE patterns) than ST437, which was grouped under a single PFGE pattern.
Table 1.
ST | PFGE pattern(s) | No. of isolates | Location(s)b | MIC range (μg/ml) (no. of resistant isolates/total no. of isolates)a |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P/T | CAZ | CRO | FEP | AZT | ERT | IMI | MER | CIP | GENT | POLB | ||||
ST11 | A, C, E, F, G, I | 10 | São Paulo, SP; Porto Alegre, RS; Recife, PE; Belo Horizonte, MG; Brasília, DF | 64–256 (10/10) | 16–256 (10/10) | 64–>256 (10/10) | 64–>256 (10/10) | 128–>256 (10/10) | 8–256 (10/10) | 2–64 (8/10) | 1–64 (9/10) | 4–>32 (10/10) | 0.5–256 (5/10) | 1–64 (1/10) |
ST17 | H | 1 | Campo Grande, MS | 256 (1/1) | 16 (1/1) | 16 (1/1) | 8 (0/1) | 128 (1/1) | 4 (1/1) | 1 (0/1) | 2 (0/1) | 4 (1/1) | 0.5 (0/1) | 32 (1/1) |
ST70 | B | 2 | João Pessoa, PB | 128 (2/2) | 8 (0/2) | 8–16 (2/2) | 2–4 (0/2) | 16–64 (2/2) | 2 (2/2) | 0.5 (0/2) | 1 (0/2) | 1 (0/2) | 0.5 (0/2) | 1 (0/2) |
ST133 | A | 1 | São Paulo, SP | 128 (1/1) | 8 (0/1) | 8 (1/1) | 64 (1/1) | >256 (1/1) | 8 (1/1) | ≤1 (0/1) | ≤1 (0/1) | ≤0.25 (0/1) | 1 (0/1) | 4 (0/1) |
ST340 | A | 1 | São Paulo, SP | 128 (1/1) | 128 (1/1) | 256 (1/1) | 64 (1/1) | 256 (1/1) | 8 (1/1) | 1 (0/1) | 2 (0/1) | 32 (1/1) | 128 (1/1) | 1 (0/1) |
ST437 | A | 18 | João Pessoa, PB; São Paulo, SP | 64–256 (17/18) | 8–>256 (17/18) | 32–>256 (18/18) | 8–>256 (17/18) | 128–>256 (18/18) | 4–>256 (18/18) | ≤0.25–64 (6/18) | ≤0.5–64 (7/18) | 32–>256 (18/18) | 0.5–128 (4/18) | 1–64 (2/18) |
ST617 | D | 1 | São Paulo, SP | 256 (1/1) | 16 (1/1) | 32 (1/1) | 16 (0/1) | 128 (1/1) | 4 (1/1) | 0.5 (0/1) | 2 (0/1) | 0.25 (0/1) | 0.5 (0/1) | 1 (0/1) |
Total % resistance | 94.1 | 88.2 | 100 | 85.3 | 100 | 100 | 41.2 | 47.1 | 88.2 | 29.4 | 11.8 |
P/T, piperacillin-tazobactam; CAZ, ceftazidime; CRO, ceftriaxone; FEP, cefepime; AZT, aztreonam; ERT, ertapenem; IMI, imipenem; MER, meropenem; CIP, ciprofloxacin; GENT, gentamicin; and POLB, polymyxin B.
DF, Distrito Federal; MG, Minas Gerais; MS, Mato Grosso do Sul; PB, Paraíba; PE, Pernambuco; RS, Rio Grande do Sul; and SP, São Paulo.
Single representatives of ST133, ST340, and ST617 were found among isolates collected from distinct hospitals located in the same city. Of notice, only strains belonging to ST11 and ST437 showed imipenem and meropenem resistance, whereas reduced susceptibility to polymyxin B was observed in seven (20.6%) isolates that belonged to three PFGE patterns: A (5 isolates), C, and H. These PFGE patterns were grouped under four STs, ST11 (2 isolates), ST17, ST133, and ST437 (3 isolates).
In the study by Andrade et al. (1), ST258 was the most frequently reported ST among KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. However, these authors have studied only K. pneumoniae isolates collected from two Brazilian states (São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro). In our study, we included strains isolated from São Paulo and six other Brazilian states (Distrito Federal, Mato Grosso do Sul, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, and Rio Grande do Sul). Despite the identification of novel STs, we observed the predominance of ST437, which is a single-locus variant of ST258, among Brazilian isolates. Our results corroborate the initial findings regarding the predominance of CC258 among KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae isolates (6). These data suggest that KPC-2-producing isolates originated from a common ancestor derived from ST258, which has undergone genetic evolution. These findings point out that horizontal acquisition of blaKPC-2 by genetically unrelated strains has contributed to the dissemination of KPC-2-producing isolates throughout Brazilian territory, but hospital outbreaks caused by single clones have also influenced the increased frequency of ST437 isolation observed in this study.
(Part of this study was presented at the 51st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL, 17 to 20 September 2011.)
Contributor Information
Renata C. Picão, Laboratório Alerta Division of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
Antônia de O. Machado, Laboratório Central Hospital São Paulo Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
Ana C. Gales, Laboratório Alerta Division of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil
REFERENCES
- 1. Andrade LN, et al. 2011. Dissemination of blaKPC-2 by the spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae clonal complex 258 clones (ST258, ST11, ST437) and plasmids (IncFII, IncN, IncL/M) among Enterobacteriaceae species in Brazil. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:3579–3583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2012. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-second informational supplement. M100-S22 CLSI, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
- 3. Diancourt L, Passet V, Verhoef J, Grimont PA, Brisse S. 2005. Multilocus sequence typing of Klebsiella pneumoniae nosocomial isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4178–4182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 5 November 2011, accession date Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 1. 3, January 2011. http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/
- 5. Monteiro J, Santos AF, Asensi MD, Peirano G, Gales AC. 2009. First report of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains in Brazil. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:333–334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Seki LM, et al. 2011. Molecular epidemiology of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in Brazil: the predominance of sequence type 437. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 70:274–277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Tenover FC, et al. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233–2239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]