Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2012 Aug 17;7(8):e43534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043534

Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Distribution of Deep-Water Gorgonian Corals in Relation to Seabed Topography on the Norwegian Margin

Ruiju Tong 1,*, Autun Purser 1, Vikram Unnithan 1, Janine Guinan 2
Editor: Sebastian CA Ferse3
PMCID: PMC3422289  PMID: 22912887

Abstract

Investigating the relationship between deep-water coral distribution and seabed topography is important for understanding the terrain habitat selection of these species and for the development of predictive habitat models. In this study, the distribution of the deep-water gorgonians, Paragorgia arborea and Primnoa resedaeformis, in relation to terrain variables at multiple scales of 30 m, 90 m and 170 m were investigated at Røst Reef, Traena Reef and Sotbakken Reef on the Norwegian margin, with Ecological Niche Factor Analysis applied. To date, there have been few published studies investigating this aspect of gorgonian distribution. A similar correlation between the distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis and each particular terrain variable was found at each study site, but the strength of the correlation between each variable and distribution differed by reef. The terrain variables of bathymetric position index (BPI) and curvature at analysis scales of 90 m or 170 m were most strongly linked to the distribution of both species at the three geographically distinct study sites. Both gorgonian species tended to inhabit local topographic highs across all three sites, particularly at Sotbakken Reef and Traena Reef, with both species observed almost exclusively on such topographic highs. The tendency for observed P. arborea to inhabit ridge crests at Røst Reef was much greater than was indicated for P. resedaeformis. This investigation identifies the terrain variables which most closely correlate with distribution of these two gorgonian species, and analyzes their terrain habitat selection; further development of predictive habitat models may be considered essential for effective management of these species.

Introduction

Deep-water gorgonian corals are found throughout the world’s oceans and Mediterranean Sea, with the majority reported at depths of 200–1,000 m [1]. Paragorgia arborea and Primnoa resedaeformis are amongst the largest deep-water gorgonians, with colonies reaching heights of 50–250 cm [2]. These species are commonly found in the North Atlantic [1], [3], [4], [5], often in water masses with temperatures of 6–8°C and high salinity [2]. Both species produce tree-like colony morphologies, which provide habitats within and between colonies, commonly utilized by numerous invertebrate species [3], [6], [7]. However, due to their arborescent morphology and assumed slow growth, these gorgonian corals are vulnerable to anthropogenic impacts such as bottom trawling and gillnet fishing, and are often reported as fishing bycatch [2], [8], [9], [10], [11].

Deep-water corals (DWCs) are typically observed in abundance in areas of pronounced topographic relief [1], [3], [5], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Seabed topographic features may control the coral distribution indirectly by governing current regimes, thereby influencing the flux of suspended food material [1], [12], [16], [17], [18], [19], and also by influencing sediment distribution that is important for initial coral settlement [20], [21]. For the past two decades multibeam echosounder surveys have been providing detailed bathymetry data suitable for broad characterization of large regions of the seafloor. Wilson et al. [21] comprehensively summarized the terrain variables (topography descriptors) derived from such multibeam bathymetry data into four types – 1) slope type, 2) aspect type, 3) curvature and bathymetric position index (BPI) type, and 4) terrain variability type. Characterization of the seabed topography in terms of such terrain variables at multiple scales may have ecological relevance to the distribution of benthic fauna, with these variables acting as proxies for bottom current velocity or substrate type at local and regional scales [18], [21].

Information on the distribution and population densities of deep-water gorgonians is required for conservation and management of these species, but such data is scarce given the high costs associated with sampling and surveying in deep sea. Predictive habitat suitability may be used as proxies for species distribution, or for optimizing mapping strategies [16], [17], [18], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], i.e. to indicate seafloor areas which may contain corals and coral ecosystems with the potential to be put at risk by human activities such as bottom trawling, long-line or gillnet fishing [8], [27]. Gridded bathymetry data and the derived terrain variables are often adopted as descriptors of seabed topography when developing predictive habitat models. Investigating the relationship between the distribution of deep-water gorgonians and the associated terrain variables will improve our understanding of the terrain habitat requirements of the species, and is also important in developing such predictive models [12]. However, to date, investigations of how these terrain variables relate to DWC distribution have focused primarily on hard scleractinian corals rather than gorgonians [12], [17], [18], [24], [25].

This study investigated the distribution of the deep-sea gorgonians, P. arborea and P. resedaeformis, in relation to seabed topography at Røst Reef and Traena Reef, and P. arborea at Sotbakken Reef on the Norwegian margin. These three reef complexes vary greatly in topography and environmental conditions, with Røst Reef located on the shelf margin, Sotbakken Reef at the northern tip of the Norwegian Shelf and Traena Reef on the inner shelf (Figure 1). This study aims to address the following questions: (1) which, if any, particular terrain variables correlate most closely with the observed distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis at Røst Reef and Traena Reef, and of P. arborea at Sotbakken Reef; (2) what, if any, trends exist in habitat selection of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis at Røst Reef and Traena Reef, and of P. arborea at Sotbakken Reef.

Figure 1. Three study sites on the Norwegian margin – Sotbakken Reef, Røst Reef and Traena Reef.

Figure 1

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

The survey of the reefs presented in this study was permitted by the Institute of Marine Research, Norway.

Study Areas

Røst Reef, Traena Reef and Sotbakken Reef are three reef complexes located on the Norwegian margin, at depths of 250–400 m (Figure 1), with living DWCs present (Figure 2). The Sotbakken Reef and Røst Reef have been reviewed as part of the Norwegian seabed mapping program MAREANO [28], [29], [30]. The water mass at the three reef complexes is of Atlantic origin [31], with a temperature >5°C and salinity >35‰ [32].

Figure 2. Applied categories of substrate presence.

Figure 2

The Røst Reef was discovered off the SW tip of the Lofoten islands by the Institute of Marine Research (IMR), Norway in May 2002 [33]. The reef complex is 35–40 km long and up to 3 km wide, situated along a rugged part of the shelf break characterized by steep seabed gradients [33].

The Sotbakken Reef is located on a triangular plateau on the upper part of a large submarine slide (∼30 km in width) situated in the cross-shelf trough Håkjerringdjupet off Tromsø between Fugløybanken and Nordvestbanken [34].

The Traena Reef complex is located in a sheltered embayment on the northern edge of the cross-shelf trough Traenajupet [35]. The complex consists of a field of reefs of similar size elongated in a similar direction, suggesting that reef development may be directly related to the local hydrodynamic conditions.

Data Acquisition and Analysis

The majority of the data used in this study was acquired during the Polarstern ARK XXII/1a expedition (2007) [36], comprising of ship-borne multibeam echosounder bathymetry data at Røst Reef and Sotbakken Reef, time-stamped videos from nine JAGO (IFM-GEOMAR) submersible dives and associated JAGO dive positioning data. Ship-borne multibeam bathymetry data collected from Traena Reef by IMR was also used in this study [35].

The multibeam bathymetry data was logged by a Hydrosweep DS-3 multibeam sonar data acquisition system at Røst Reef and Sotbakken Reef and further processed using the open source software MB-system. The processed data was projected from longitude and latitude on the WGS84 reference ellipsoid to UTM Zone 32N coordinates at the Røst Reef, and to UTM Zone 34N coordinates at the Sotbakken Reef, and gridded to 10 m resolution raster. The bathymetry data at Traena Reef was provided in fully processed format with 10 m resolution and WGS 84 UTM Zone 32N coordinates. The positioning data for the JAGO dives was cleaned of erroneous readings by removing outliers, assuming a maximum JAGO survey speed of ∼0.8 m s−1. The data was further cleaned using a Gaussian smoothing technique (used software package Adelie-GIS 1.8) to decrease the random error in the positioning data.

The presence of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis colonies was logged using the software package OFOP 3.2.0j (Ocean Floor Observation Protocol) throughout each dive video, with locations determined by comparison with the associated, cleaned and timecode-stamped JAGO submersible positioning data. In addition, the substrate was characterized throughout each dive video, with the following categories used: coral rubble, exposed dead coral framework, live isolated coral framework, dense live coral, coral terrace, soft sediment, hardground, pebbles/cobbles, boulders (Figure 2). Throughout the video transects, the predominant (greatest frame coverage) of these substrate categories present within the video was logged. These categories followed those used in a published study of the Sula Reef complex on the Norwegian margin [37]. Regions of seafloor were defined as ‘Coral terrace’ in the current study if they consisted of large L. pertusa frameworks, either exhibiting the ‘inclined wall’ growth morphology with live polyps on crest (see Figure 2H), as often observed at Røst Reef, or exhibiting the ‘cauliflower’ morphology with live polyps on the framework surface and radiating outwards from its center, as often found at Sotbakken Reef.

Multiscale Terrain Variables

In this study, 20 multiscale terrain variables (seabed topography descriptors) were calculated at scales of 30 m, 90 m and 170 m, corresponding to moving window sizes of 3×3, 9×9 and 17×17 cells, from the gridded multibeam bathymetry data for each of the study sites (Table 1). The scales used were adopted based on the assumption that terrain variables at the selected spatial scales may correlate with the distribution of the studied species [12], [18], [21], [38].

Table 1. Multiscale terrain variables applied in this study.

Terrain variable Moving window size (m) Software
30×30 90×90 170×170
Slope SLO3 SLO9 SLO17 Landserf 2.3
Aspect ASP3 ASP9 ASP17 Landserf 2.3
Mean Curvature MEC3 MEC9 MEC17 Landserf 2.3
Plan Curvature PLC3 PLC9 PLC17 Landserf 2.3
Profile Curvature PRC3 PRC9 PRC17 Landserf 2.3
BPI BPI3 BPI9 BPI17 ArcGIS 9.2
Rugosity RUG3 ArcView 3x. ext.
TRI TRI3 ArcGIS 9.2 macro

In the current study, slope has relevance in that it influences current flow amplification [12], [21], with consequences for the delivery of food particles to the corals. Aspect provides information on orientation of a region of the seabed, and therefore the degree to which the seabed terrain is exposed to local and regional prevalent currents. Aspect may therefore be important in determining benthic habitat morphology and community structure, and is likely of high importance for suspension-feeding fauna [12] such as the gorgonians in this study. DWCs are prevalent on topographic highs and therefore colony concentrations may be associated with the relative position of a region of seabed in relation to the surrounding area. Here, the frequently used descriptors of seabed relative positions – BPI, plan curvature, profile curvature and mean curvature [17], [21], were derived at the selected multiple scales to investigate their relative importance on the distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis. Certain species (such as P. arborea and P. resedaeformis) are most numerous in complex habitats with strong structural components (e.g., on rocky outcrops), whereas other species tend to occupy soft sediment on flat terrain [21]. Therefore, change in seabed terrain complexity is often associated with changes in species colonization. For this investigation, two frequently used descriptors for terrain complexity – rugosity and terrain ruggedness index (TRI, a measure of the local depth variation compared to the focal cell of the analysis window [12], [17], [18], [21]), have been applied to test their relative importance on the distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis.

Multivariate Statistics Method – Ecological Niche Factor Analysis

Ecological Niche Factor Analysis (ENFA) is a multivariate statistical method, which transforms a number of possibly correlated variables into the same number of uncorrelated factors. But unlike the similar method of Principal Component Analysis, the factors have ecological meaning, with the first factor accounting for the marginality information and part of the specialization information of species distribution, and the following factors accounting for the remaining specialization information [39], [40]. Marginality represents the degree to which the species realized ecological niche differs from the mean available habitat, therefore aiding in determining the preference of the species for specific environmental conditions within the available space. Specialization is defined as the ratio of the ecological variance of the mean available habitat to that observed for the focal species, therefore quantifying the narrowness of the species realized ecological niche with regard to particular environmental variables [40].

In this study, the terrain variables were first normalized by applying the Box-Cox algorithm [40]. ENFA (used software package Biomapper version 4.0) was performed on P. arborea at Sotbakken Reef by using the 20 terrain variables outlined in Table 1. For both species at Røst Reef and Traena Reef, depth was added as a further terrain variable. The marginality (normalized) and specialization of species distribution contributed by each terrain variable were then calculated using Biomapper. The specialization values were manually normalized. The contribution of each terrain variable was calculated as the mean value of the marginality value and normalized specialization value contributed by the corresponding variable, and further manually normalized. The higher the marginality value, the further the species distribution departs from the mean available habitat for that terrain variable [17], [18], [21]. The higher the specialization value, the more narrowly focused the species distribution is with regard to the corresponding variable [40]. The higher the normalized contribution value, the more closely related the terrain variable is with the species distribution. The important terrain variables were identified by comparing their corresponding normalized contribution values. The species habitat selection was assessed by analyzing the coefficients of the marginality factor (with a positive coefficient indicating preference for higher-than-mean values for that terrain variable, and vice versa) and the normalized specialization contributed by each terrain variable.

Results

In total, 754 gorgonian colonies were recorded from nine video transects, over a distance of 3.8 km, with 51.7% and 73.1% occurrences of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis colonies, respectively, observed at the Røst Reef (Table 2). Additional results were analyzed for each coral reef complex.

Table 2. P. arborea and P. resedaeformis occurrence observed at three study sites by JAGO dives.

Transect At reef complex Length (m) Observed colonies
P. arborea P. resedaeformis
Dive1 Røst Reef 485 27 38
Dive2 Røst Reef 489 104 104
Dive3 Røst Reef 406 65 132
Dive4 Sotbakken Reef 542 67 10
Dive5 Sotbakken Reef 674 51 8
Dive6 Sotbakken Reef 332 7 0
Dive7 Traena Reef 312 30 36
Dive8 Traena Reef 365 23 43
Dive9 Traena Reef 197 5 4
sum 3802 379 375

The length given in the table is the sum of length sections of JAGO dive transect with usable video.

Røst Reef

Figure 3A and 3B show that BPI and curvature at analysis scales of 90 m and 170 m were most closely correlated with the observed distribution of both P. arborea and P. resedaeformis at Røst Reef, with the correlation strength increasing with the analysis scale increases. Additionally, seabed aspect (ASP9) was found to be closely related with the distribution of both species (particularly P. arborea) at Røst Reef (Figure 3A, 3B). Figure 4 indicates that both species were observed with a relatively greater abundance in areas with seabed orientation of [45°, 90°] on variable ASP9. The high abundance of P. arborea was also observed in association with seabed aspect orientation of [0°, 45°]. For P. resedaeformis, high abundance was also observed in areas with [270°, 315°] azimuth orientation.

Figure 3. Contribution of each terrain variable to observed distribution of species.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Percentage distribution of ASP9 of the overall available habitat, P. arborea observed localities and P. resedaeformis observed localities at Røst Reef.

Figure 4

The positive marginality coefficients of BPI, mean curvature and profile curvature, and the negative marginality coefficients of plan curvature (Figure 5A, 5B) indicated both species tended to inhabit topographic highs with higher values of BPI, mean curvature and profile curvature, and lower values of plan curvature than mean available habitat at Røst Reef. Terrain variables PLC9, ASP9 and PRC9 were found to contribute differently to the marginality of the observed distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis. PLC9 and ASP9 contributed to the marginality of P. arborea distribution much more than to the marginality of P. resedaeformis distribution, whilst PRC9 contributed to the marginality of P. resedaeformis distribution to a much greater extent than to marginality of P. arborea distribution.

Figure 5. Biplots of the marginality and specialization of species distribution contributed by each terrain variable.

Figure 5

Those terrain variables making the largest contribution (the absolute of x or y>0.3, or the sum of absolute x and y>0.45) are highlighted in bold.

Bathymetry data showed the surveyed region of the Røst Reef to be characterized by steep ridges of up to ∼150 m width, running in a SW–NE direction on the shelf break, with the shelf sloping in a north westerly direction (Figure 6A). Parameter MEC17 highlighted the crests of the large ridges (those with widths of approx. >120 m). Where a larger ridge was closely spaced with small neighboring ridges, MEC17 commonly smoothed and captured these ridges as one large ridge-like feature, highlighting the crest of the ridge-like feature in red (Figure 6B). ASP9 illustrated the ridges as a spatially scalariform array facing toward the NW (Figure 6C). PLC9 captured the uppermost crests of the ridges as topographic divergences (pink) and the seabed depression areas between the ridges as the topographic convergences (green) (Figure 6D). The smaller-scale parameter MEC3 was effective at capturing the detailed terrain variations and highlighting the local topographic reliefs (dark yellow) (Figure 7).

Figure 6. Bathymetry and terrain variables at Røst Reef.

Figure 6

(A) bathymetry with three JAGO dive transects and main bottom current direction, (B) MEC17, (C) ASP9, (D) PLC9.

Figure 7. Terrain variable MEC3 at Røst Reef.

Figure 7

At Røst Reef, two JAGO dive transects (Dive1, Dive2) traversed the ridges, with the third (Dive3) surveying the upper slide (Figure 6A). Dense live L. pertusa colonies and L. pertusa terraces were observed mainly on the upper section of the ridges (particularly on the east facing side) (Dive1, Dive2), and of the relief structure situated on the upper slide (Dive3) (Figure 8). The L. pertusa terraces with live polyps on surface, predominantly faced in east to south direction. Substrate categories of hardground, pebbles/cobbles, and boulders were often observed on lower sections of the ridges and in seabed depressions between ridge structures. Both gorgonian species were observed abundantly distributed on coral framework or rubble on the ridges. A percentage of both species were also found on hard substrates and on boulders/cobbles on lower section of the ridges and in the seabed depressions (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Detailed plots of boxed areas B1, B2 and B3 (from Figure 6B).

Figure 8

The substrate presence, P. arborea and P. resedaeformis occurrence along the JAGO dive transects were shown for each corresponding area.

Sotbakken Reef

Figure 3C indicates that BPI and curvature (BPI and plan curvature at scales of 90 m and 170 m and MEC9) were most closely correlated with the observed distribution of P. arborea at Sotbakken Reef. P. arborea tended to inhabit positions with higher values of BPI, mean curvature, profile curvature, and lower values of plan curvature than mean available habitat, indicated by the coefficients of the marginality factor (Figure 5C).

Bathymetry data revealed that the seabed topography at Sotbakken Reef is characterized by a large plateau in the SE area, with a slope value of ∼14° (SLO17) to the NW (Figure 9A). A large mound is located on the NW extremity of this plateau, ∼20 m above the surrounding plateau and extending more than 1 km in a SW–NE direction. BPI17 highlighted the upper steep slope (red), and sections on crest of the mound (red) such as the high relief structures (∼100 m diameter) (Figure 9B). PLC9 captured the topographic divergence area elongated in a SW–NE direction on crest of the large mound, and highlighted the detailed sections of local topographic highs in pink and local depressions in-between in green (Figure 9C).

Figure 9. Bathymetry and terrain variables at Sotbakken Reef.

Figure 9

(A) bathymetry with three JAGO dive transects and main bottom current direction, (B) BPI17, (C) PLC9.

At Sotbakken Reef, three submersible transects crossed the crest of the mound and its SE flank (Figure 9A). Substrate type observed across this flank was predominantly soft sediment with some boulders or pebbles/cobbles (Figure 10). Coral rubble and soft sediment with some pebbles/cobbles were observed across the eastern crest of the mound. Large L. pertusa frameworks were observed throughout the high relief structure on the western crest (Figure 10), with colonies exhibiting the ‘cauliflower’ growth morphology [41] and forming terraces around the relief structure and outwards from its center. Additionally, both gorgonian species were found concentrated on the L. pertusa reef on the western crest. The large fan-shaped P. arborea colonies were often observed with the concave side facing in a NE to SE direction.

Figure 10. Detailed plots of boxed areas B1, B2 and B3 (from Figure 9B).

Figure 10

The substrate presence, P. arborea and P. resedaeformis occurrence along the JAGO dive transects were shown for each corresponding area.

Traena Reef

Figures 3D and 3E indicate that BPI and curvature (BPI9, BPI17, MEC9 and PLC9) were the variables which most closely correlated with the observed distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis at Traena Reef. Additionally, terrain variability RUG3 was also relevant to distribution of both species, and TRI3 also relevant to P. arborea distribution at this site. Both species were most prevalent in positions with higher values of BPI, mean curvature, profile curvature, RUG3, TRI3 and lower values of plan curvature than mean available habitat, as indicated by the coefficients of the marginality factor (Figure 5D, 5E).

The bathymetry data collected by IMR showed the Traena Reef complex to be characterized by many reefs elongated in a WSW–ENE direction, each with approximate dimensions of 30–60 m width, 100–180 m length and 5 m height (Figure 11A). BPI17 highlighted the upper sections of these reef structures in red (Figure 11B). PLC9 differentiated the crests of reef structures as divergent areas of the seabed (pink) surrounded by convergent areas (green) (Figure 11C). RUG3 effectively captured the relative flat reef crests and high terrain complexity of the reef slopes (Figure 11D).

Figure 11. Bathymetry and terrain variables at Traena Reef.

Figure 11

(A) bathymetry with three JAGO dive transects and main bottom current direction, (B) BPI17, (C) PLC9, (D) RUG3.

At Traena Reef, the three submersible transects crossed the crests and sides of a number of the elongated reefs (Figure 11A). Dense coral framework (mostly dead) was observed on the eastern tip of the reefs, with dense coral rubble logged throughout the western region of the reefs (Figure 12). Fine-grained sediment (silt to clay and biogenic debris) with some cobbles and boulders was observed on the seafloor between the reefs. Highest densities of both gorgonian species were observed at the eastern section of the reefs, usually on coral framework or rubble substrate.

Figure 12. Detailed plots of boxed areas B1, B2 and B3 (from Figure 11B).

Figure 12

The substrate presence, P. arborea and P. resedaeformis occurrence along the JAGO dive transects were shown for each corresponding area.

Discussion

Key Terrain Variables Across Study Sites

The terrain variables examined in this study had similar correlation patterns with distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis at each particular study site of Røst Reef and Traena Reef, but different correlation patterns with species distribution across different study sites (Figure 3). This would suggest that the terrain variables closely correlated with the distribution of these two species appear to differ across study sites with different geographical settings, but are similar at a particular reef complex. In this study, the variables slope, aspect, RUG3 and TRI3 varied in ecological relevance to distribution of these two species across the study sites, whilst the variables BPI and curvature, particularly BPI, mean curvature and plan curvature at analysis scales of 90 m or 170 m, proved to be most relevant to the observed distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis at Røst Reef and Traena Reef, and to P. arborea distribution at Sotbakken Reef (Figure 3).

The terrain variables of BPI and curvature have been reported to be strongly correlated with L.pertusa coverage [12], and are considered important in habitat suitability modeling for distribution of DWCs such as Madrepora oculata and L. pertusa [17], L. pertusa isolated colonies and/or L. pertusa reefs [18], [25] at analysis scales of meters to hundreds of meters. The importance of BPI and curvature in habitat predictions highlights the importance of the relative position of focal localities to the surrounding terrain in influencing distribution of the investigated DWCs. Given that the three reef complexes investigated in this study varied greatly in morphology and underlying topography, the distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis was most closely correlated with the topographic properties BPI and curvature. We hypothesize that at other comparable study sites (such as other locations with similar depth and substrate availability on the European margin), similar close relationship may also exist. Additionally, the degree to which the distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis correlated with terrain variables is scale-dependent. The selection of suitable analysis scales of terrain variables is therefore important in habitat prediction, to ensure features which most influence distribution of a target species are captured.

Scale-dependent Terrain Variables Correlated with Coral Distribution

The distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis in relation to terrain variables is scale-dependent. At Røst Reef, the BPI, mean curvature, plan curvature and profile curvature at analysis scales of 90 m and 170 m, and ASP9 proved to be most relevant to the observed distribution of both species (Figure 3A, 3B). This result suggests the importance of the ridge structures captured by these variables at a scale of 90 m, and the large ridges or ridge-like features captured by the variables at a scale of 170 m, in influencing both species’ distribution (Figure 6). At Sotbakken Reef, BPI and plan curvature at scales of 90 m and 170 m, and MEC9 were found most closely related to P. arborea distribution (Figure 3C), with these variables highlighting particular features of the large mound such as the high relief structures on the crest (Figure 9). At Traena Reef, the BPI9, BPI17, MEC9, PLC9 and RUG3 proved to be most closely related to distribution of both species (Figure 3D, 3E), with these variables capturing the individual reef structures (Figure 11).

At continental margins, DWCs rely on the delivery of phytodetritus, zooplankton, or particulate organic matter derived from near-surface primary production [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], often via lateral advection within the benthic boundary layer [44], [50]. In order to maximize encounter rates with food particles, DWCs adjust their colony growth morphologies to face into the prevailing bottom current [1], [2], [7]. At Røst Reef, the L. pertusa structural terraces with dense live polyp coverage were observed to be oriented predominantly SE, as were the concave side of the observed P. arborea colony fans. Such colony growth morphologies would indicate that the food material was likely transported prevalently in a NW direction via cross-shelf transport [7], [15], [19]. Two short duration ADCP deployments (18 and 24 hours) at Røst Reef taken during the same research cruise also indicated bottom current flow in a NW direction [36]. At Sotbakken Reef, the concave surface of the large P. arborea colonies was predominantly observed facing between NE and SE, indicating the prevalent bottom current as likely flowing in a westerly direction. At Traena Reef, dense dead and some living coral framework were observed in the eastern area of the parallel reefs elongated in WSW–ENE direction (Figure 12). Such a growth morphology indicates a westerly flowing prevalent bottom current [3], again supported by a 24-hour ADCP deployment at Traena Reef carried out during the same cruise [36].

Local topography can strongly influence bottom current velocity [51], [52], [53]. The terrain features such as ridges or ridge-like features, captured by these important terrain variables at Røst Reef, may result in acceleration of the bottom current velocity (cross-shelf, prevalently NW flowing) on the upstream side of the ridge structures or ridge-like features [19]. Enhanced bottom currents have been shown to be important for food supply to DWCs [52], [54], [55], [56], increasing the transport of particles in benthic boundary layer either down towards the seabed or in from the surroundings to where DWCs can catch them [19]. Additionally, high bottom current velocity prevents living coral colonies from being buried by sediment, ensuring periodic clearance of the coral surface of deposited material [51], [53]. The mound/reef topography induces localized increasing current velocity and mixing, which may promote the advection of food particles for utilization by suspension feeders (such as DWCs) in some regions of the mound/reef structure [46], [52], [56], [57]. Locations such as the relief structures on the crest of the mound highlighted by the most important terrain variables at Sotbakken Reef and the upper sections of the reef structures highlighted at Traena Reef are examples of those likely to benefit from this increased food flux.

The correlation between variables BPI and curvature and the observed distribution of both species increased with the analysis scale increases at Røst Reef, indicating the possibility of even stronger correlation at larger analysis scales. This suggests the potential importance of even larger scale terrain features at the Røst Reef, in influencing distribution of both species, those at a larger scale than investigated here. A tidal current regime has been reported at L. pertusa reefs on the Norwegian shelf [58], [59]. It is possible that large ridge-like features of hundreds of meters diameter may have a pronounced impact on residual and tidal flow, such as reported at the Galway Mound on the Irish Margin [56], thus influence coral distribution. Traena Reef will not be exposed to such a tidal effect as these large scale features are absent at the location. This absence is likely the reason why the increasing contribution of BPI and curvature observed at Røst Reef with increasing analysis scale is not also observed at Traena Reef. This hypothesis is supported by Mortensen & Buhl-Mortensen [1], who report the distribution and abundance of gorgonian corals to be positively related to large-scale topographic features such as shelf breaks and ridges, as qualitatively assessed from bathymetric map data in the Northeast Channel at Atlantic Canada.

In this study, the terrain variables of BPI and curvature at the 30 m analysis scale were shown to have a lesser relevance than those at 90 m or 170 m analysis scales to the observed distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis, particularly at Røst Reef. These variables at a scale of 30 m captured detailed terrain variation, rather than the larger features such as the ridge structures at Røst Reef, or the topographic relief structures on the crest of the mound at Sotbakken Reef, or the reef structures at Traena Reef. Additionally, bathymetric noise may account for some of the observed variability to a greater degree at this scale than at larger scales [38]. The resolution of ship-borne bathymetry data used in this study is not high enough to calculate the terrain variables at a scale relevant to the variation of macro habitat (1–10 m).

Assessing Terrain Habitat Selection

At each of the three geographically distinct study sites, P. arborea and P. resedaeformis tended to inhabit positions with higher values of BPI, mean curvature and profile curvature, and lower plan curvature (at 90 m or 170 m analysis scale) than the mean available habitat, shown by ENFA (Figure 5). This indicates that both species have a tendency to occupy topographic highs with slope increasing downhill (typically on upper slopes) or topographic divergence, such as the upper sections of the ridges or the large ridge-like features at Røst Reef, the upper flanks of the large mound and relief structures on the crest of the mound at Sotbakken Reef, and the upper sections of the reef structures at Traena Reef. Such habitat preferences have been reported for DWCs elsewhere [1], [3], [5], [12], [13], [17]. Such topographic highs are normally associated with hard substrates, and strong bottom current velocities [5], [15], [16], [60], indicating likely elevated food availability for benthic species.

Both P. arborea and P. resedaeformis were observed in high abundance on structural L. pertusa frameworks at the three study sites. Examples of such structures include the dense frameworks located on the upper sections of the ridge structures or the ridge-like features at Røst Reef (Figure 8), the flourishing L. pertusa reef on the western crest of the mound at Sotbakken Reef (Figure 10), and the coral frameworks at the eastern tips of the reefs at Traena Reef (Figure 12). The physical structure of L. pertusa coral framework increases local turbulence, thereby increasing inflowing food flux and making a greater volume of material available for DWCs [45]. Additionally, such dense coral frameworks may act as a trap for particles, including primary pelagic, resuspended and locally produced benthic material released by fauna [54], [61]. The resuspension of freshly deposited particles during periods of heightened flow velocity will often make available to corals the same material a number of times, possibly regularly in tidally driven locations [54]. At the time of the reef surveys, the bottom current velocities exceeded 15 cm s–1 (the critical speed required for resuspension of surface sediment in the NE Atlantic continental margin [62]) for a percentage of the time that the ADCP flow meters were deployed [36], indicated that periodic resuspension of settled material is likely a recurring feature at Røst Reef and Traena Reef.

A percentage of both P. arborea and P. resedaeformis colonies were observed in topographic low-lying areas with negative MEC17 values, e.g. the lower sections of the large ridge structures or ridge-like features and the depressions in-between these structures at Røst Reef (Figure 8). The substrate within these areas was dominated by hardground, pebbles/cobbles or boulders, which are likely to aid the gorgonian corals in settlement. At Traena Reef and Sotbakken Reef, almost all colonies were observed at topographic highs with positive BPI17 (Figure 10, 12). The widely distributed soft sediment around the reefs at Traena Reef complex, and the soft sediment around the relief structures on the western crest of the mound at Sotbakken Reef, may be an additional factor limiting the spreading of corals locally (Figure 10, 12). The remaining coral rubble on the eastern crest of this mound with few colonies of each gorgonian species observed at Sotbakken Reef is likely a result of heavy fishing activities in this area.

A difference in distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis at Røst Reef was indicated by the different contribution of PLC9/PRC9/ASP9 to the marginality of each species distribution (Figure 5A, 5B). P. arborea tended to inhabit the topographic divergences such as on the crest of ridges to a greater degree than did P. resedaeformis, whilst P. resedaeformis tended to inhabit areas with slope increasing downhill such as on the upper slopes of ridge features stronger than P. arborea. At Røst Reef, a higher abundance of P. arborea was observed on the crest and east-facing side of the large ridges (ASP9 [0°, 45°] and [45°, 90°]), whilst P. resedaeformis was abundant on the east-facing side of the ridges and the small relief structures on the relatively smooth upper slide with west-facing direction (ASP9 [45°, 90°] and [270°, 315°]) (Figure 4). The two species are filter feeding organisms, capturing food passively from that maintained in suspension by benthic currents. The fan-shape structures of P. arborea colonies have been hypothesized to increase food capture efficiency under flow [5], whilst P. resedaeformis, with an irregular bushy morphology, appears to utilize a more refractory, resuspended food supply than the more erect P. arborea [2]. The potential difference in diet and/or food collection strategy between the two species may partly explain the slight difference in the distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis. However, such a difference in the tendency of the distribution of the two species was not clear at Traena Reef.

Conclusions

This study investigated the relationship between the distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis and terrain variables at locations on the Norwegian continental shelf using the multivariate statistics approach ENFA. A similar correlation between species distribution and terrain variables was found at each particular study site of Røst Reef and Traena Reef. The variables of curvature and BPI at analysis scales of 90 m or 170 m, particularly BPI, mean curvature and plan curvature, were most closely related to the distribution of P. arborea and P. resedaeformis at Røst Reef and Traena Reef, and P. arborea at Sotbakken Reef.

Both species tended to inhabit regions of local topographic highs with positive BPI at each study site, with both species observed at Sotbakken Reef and Traena Reef almost exclusively on local topographic highs. A percentage of both gorgonian species were observed on the lower sections of the ridges or the ridge-like features, or in the bathymetric depressions between these structures at Røst Reef. In addition to the role terrain features and dense L. pertusa framework may play in influencing food supply, the distribution of soft sediment around the western relief structure on the crest of the mound at Sotbakken Reef and around the reefs at Traena Reef is also likely to play a role in limiting the distribution of both species locally.

Further investigation of additional environmental variables influencing coral distribution, such as the hydrodynamic conditions at both local and regional scales, would further improve our understanding of the ecological niches required by these gorgonian species.

Acknowledgments

This work is a contribution to the “Earth System Science Research School (ESSReS)”, an initiative of the Helmholtz Association of German research centres (HGF) at the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research. Data contributions from the Polarstern ARK XXII/1a expedition (2007) and by Jan Helga Fosså (IMR, Norway) are gratefully and duly acknowledged. The authors thank Dr. Zhi Huang of Geoscience Australia, Dr. Nora Hanelt, and Dr. Margaret Dolan of Geological Survey of Norway for helpful comments on this paper, and Andrea Bleyer of AWI for English proofreading.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by a scholarship from China Scholarship Council, and a scholarship prolongation from ESSReS (Earth System Science Research School) to R. Tong. Additional funding to A. Purser was provided through the European Community's Seventh Framework programme (FP7/2007–2013) under the HERMIONE (Hotspot Ecosystem Research and Man's Impact ON European Seas) project, grant agreement no. 226354. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Mortensen PB, Buhl-Mortensen L (2004) Distribution of deep-water gorgonian corals in relation to benthic habitat features in the Northeast Channel (Atlantic Canada). Mar Biol 144: 1223–1238. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mortensen PB, Buhl-Mortensen L (2005) Morphology and growth of the deep-water gorgonians Primnoa resedaeformis and Paragorgia arborea . Mar Biol 147: 775–788. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Buhl-Mortensen L, Vanreusel A, Gooday AJ, Levin LA, Priede IG, et al. (2010) Biological structures as a source of habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity on the deep ocean margins. Mar Ecol 31: 21–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mortensen PB, Hovland M, Brattegard T, Farestveit R (1995) Deep water bioherms of the scleractinian coral Lophelia pertusa (L.) at 64° N on the Norwegian shelf: structure and associated megafauna. Sarsia 80: 145–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tendal OS (1992) The north Atlantic distribution of the octocoral Paragorgia arborea (L., 1758) (Cnidaria, Anthozoa). Sarsia 77: 213–217. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Buhl-Mortensen L, Mortensen PB, Freiwald A, Roberts JM (2005) Distribution and diversity of species associated with deep-sea gorgonian corals off Atlantic Canada. In: Freiwald A, Roberts JM, editors. Cold-Water Corals and Ecosystems. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 849–879.
  • 7.Roberts JM, Wheeler A, Freiwald A, Cairns S (2009) Cold-Water Corals: The Biology and Geology of Deep-Sea Coral Habitats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 334 p.
  • 8.Fosså JH, Skjoldal HR (2010) Conservation of Cold-Water Coral Reefs in Norway. In: Grafton RQ, Hilborn R, Squires D, Tait M, Williams MJ, editors. Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management. New York: Oxford University Press. 215–240.
  • 9. Murillo FJ, Duran Munoz P, Altuna A, Serrano A (2011) Distribution of deep-water corals of the Flemish Cap, Flemish Pass, and the Grand Banks of Newfoundland (Northwest Atlantic Ocean): interaction with fishing activities. ICES J Mar Sci 68: 319–332. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sherwood OA, Edinger EN (2009) Ages and growth rates of some deep-sea gorgonian and antipatharian corals of Newfoundland and Labrador. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66: 142–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Andrews AH, Cordes EE, Mahoney MM, Munk K, Coale KH, et al. (2002) Age, growth and radiometric age validation of a deep-sea, habitat-forming gorgonian (Primnoa resedaeformis) from the Gulf of Alaska. Hydrobiologia 471: 101–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Guinan J, Grehan AJ, Dolan MFJ, Brown C (2009) Quantifying relationships between video observations of cold-water coral cover and seafloor features in Rockall Trough, west of Ireland. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 375: 125–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leverette TL, Metaxas A (2005) Predicting habitat for two species of deep-water coral on the Canadian Atlantic continental shelf and slope. In: Freiwald A, Roberts JM, editors. Cold-Water Corals and Ecosystems. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 467–479.
  • 14. Rüggeberg A, Flögel S, Dullo W-C, Hissmann K, Freiwald A (2011) Water mass characteristics and sill dynamics in a subpolar cold-water coral reef setting at Stjernsund, northern Norway. Mar Geol 282: 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Genin A, Dayton PK, Spiess FN (1986) Corals on seamount peaks provide evidence of current acceleration over deep-sea topography. Nature 322: 59–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bryan TL, Metaxas A (2007) Predicting suitable habitat for deep-water gorgonian corals on the Atlantic and Pacific Continental Margins of North America. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 330: 113–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Dolan MFJ, Grehan AJ, Guinan JC, Brown C (2008) Modelling the local distribution of cold-water corals in relation to bathymetric variables: Adding spatial context to deep-sea video data. Deep-Sea Res Pt I 55: 1564–1579. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Guinan J, Brown C, Dolan MFJ, Grehan AJ (2009) Ecological niche modelling of the distribution of cold-water coral habitat using underwater remote sensing data. Ecol Inform 4: 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Thiem Ø, Ravagnan E, Fosså JH, Berntsen J (2006) Food supply mechanisms for cold-water corals along a continental shelf edge. J Marine Syst 60: 207–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Bryan TL, Metaxas A (2006) Distribution of deep-water corals along the North American continental margins: Relationships with environmental factors. Deep-Sea Research Pt I 53: 1865–1879. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wilson MFJ, O’Connell B, Brown C, Guinan JC, Grehan AJ (2007) Multiscale terrain analysis of multibeam bathymetry data for habitat mapping on the continental slope. Mar Geod 30: 3–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Davies A, Wisshak M, Orr JC, Roberts JM (2008) Predicting suitable habitat for the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa (Scleractinia). Deep-Sea Res Pt I 55: 1048–1062. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Davies AJ, Guinotte JM (2011) Global habitat suitability for framework-forming cold-water corals. PLoS ONE 6: e18483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Heindel K, Titschack J, Dorschel B, Huvenne VAI, Freiwald A (2010) The sediment composition and predictive mapping of facies on the Propeller Mound – A cold-water coral mound (Porcupine Seabight, NE Atlantic). Cont Shelf Res 30: 1814–1829. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Howell KL, Holt R, Endrino IP, Stewart H (2011) When the species is also a habitat: Comparing the predictively modelled distributions of Lophelia pertusa and the reef habitat it forms. Biol Conserv 144: 2656–2665. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tittensor DP, Baco AR, Brewin PE, Clark MR, Consalvey M, et al. (2009) Predicting global habitat suitability for stony corals on seamounts. J Biogeogr 36: 1111–1128. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Davies AJ, Roberts JM, Hall-Spencer J (2007) Preserving deep-sea natural heritage: Emerging issues in offshore conservation and management. Biol Conserv 138: 299–312. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Buhl-Mortensen P, Dolan M, Buhl-Mortensen L (2009) Prediction of benthic biotopes on a Norwegian offshore bank using a combination of multivariate analysis and GIS classification. ICES J Mar Sci 66: 2026–2032. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Dolan M, Buhl-Mortensen P, Thorsnes T, Buhl-Mortensen L, Bellec VK, et al. (2009) Developing seabed nature-type maps offshore Norway: initial results from the MAREANO programme. Norw J Geol 89: 17–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Mortensen PB, Buhl-Mortensen L, Dolan M, Dannheim J, Kröger K (2009) Megafaunal diversity associated with marine landscapes of northern Norway: a preliminary assessment. Norw J Geol 89: 163–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Dullo W-C, Flögel S, Rüggeberg A (2008) Cold-water coral growth in relation to the hydrography of the Celtic and Nordic European continental margin. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 371: 165–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Orvik KA, Skagseth Ø, Mork M (2001) Atlantic inflow to the Nordic Seas: current structure and volume fluxes from moored current meters, VM-ADCP and SeaSoar-CTD observations, 1995–1999. Deep-Sea Res Pt I 48: 937–957. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fosså JH, Alvsvåg J, Ottesen D, Mortensen PB (2004) Protection and management of deep-water coral reefs in Norway. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, CM AA, 08.
  • 34. Ottesen D, Stokes CR, Rise L, Olsen L (2008) Ice-sheet dynamics and ice streaming along the coastal parts of northern Norway. Quaternary Sci Rev 27: 922–940. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fosså JH, Lindberg B, Christensen O, Lundälv T, Svellingen I, et al. (2005) Mapping of Lophelia reefs in Norway: experiences and survey methods. In: Freiwald A, Roberts JM, editors. Cold-Water Corals and Ecosystems. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 359–391.
  • 36. Moje A, Purser A, Thomsen L, Unnithan V, Viergutz T (2011) Hydrodynamics and coral communities. In: to the Arctic in 2007 Klages M, Thiede J, editors. The Expedition of the Research Vessel “Polarstern” (ARK-XXII/1a-c): 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Freiwald A, Huehnerbach V, Lindberg B, Wilson JB, Campbell J (2002) The Sula Reef Complex, Norwegian Shelf. Facies 47: 179–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Albani M, Klinkenberg B, Andison DW, Kimmins JP (2004) The choice of window size in approximating topographic surfaces from Digital Elevation Models. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 18: 577–593. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Basille M, Calenge C, Marboutin E, Andersen R, Gaillard J-M (2008) Assessing habitat selection using multivariate statistics: Some refinements of the ecological-niche factor analysis. Ecol Model 211: 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Hirzel AH, Hausser J, Chessel D, Perrin N (2002) Ecological-niche factor analysis: How to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data? Ecology 83: 2027–2036. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Rogers AD (1999) The biology of Lophelia pertusa (Linnaeus 1758) and other deep-water reef-forming corals and impacts from human activities. Int Rev Hydrobiol 84: 315–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Carlier A, Le Guilloux E, Olu K, Sarrazin J, Mastrototaro F, et al. (2009) Trophic relationships in a deep Mediterranean cold-water coral bank (Santa Maria di Leuca, Ionian Sea). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 397: 125–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Duineveld GCA, Lavaleye MSS, Berghuis EM (2004) Particle flux and food supply to a seamount cold-water coral community (Galicia Bank, NW Spain). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 277: 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Duineveld GCA, Lavaleye MSS, Bergman MJN, de Stigter H, Mienis F (2007) Trophic structure of a cold-water coral mound community (Rockall Bank, NE Atlantic) in relation to the near-bottom particle supply and current regime. B Mar Sci 81: 449–467. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. van Oevelen D, Duineveld G, Lavaleye M, Mienis F, Soetaert K, et al. (2009) The cold-water coral community as a hot spot for carbon cycling on continental margins: A food-web analysis from Rockall Bank (northeast Atlantic). Limnol Oceanogr 54: 1829–1844. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Wagner H, Purser A, Thomsen L, Jesus CC, Lundälv T (2011) Particulate organic matter fluxes and hydrodynamics at the Tisler cold-water coral reef. J Marine Syst 85: 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Dodds LA, Black KD, Orr H, Roberts JM (2009) Lipid biomarkers reveal geographical differences in food supply to the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa (Scleractinia). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 397: 113–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Kiriakoulakis K, Freiwald A, Fisher E, Wolff G (2007) Organic matter quality and supply to deep-water coral/mound systems of the NW European Continental Margin. Int J Earth Sci 96: 159–170. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Mortensen PB (2001) Aquarium observations on the deep-water coral Lophelia pertusa (L., 1758) (Scleractinia) and selected associated invertebrates. Ophelia 54: 83–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Thomsen L (2002) The benthic boundary layer. In: Wefer G, Billet D, Hebbeln D, Joergensen B, Schlüter M, et al., editors. Ocean Margin Systems. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 143–155.
  • 51. Mienis F, de Stigter HC, White M, Duineveld G, de Haas H, et al. (2007) Hydrodynamic controls on cold-water coral growth and carbonate-mound development at the SW and SE Rockall Trough Margin, NE Atlantic Ocean. Deep-Sea Res Pt I 54: 1655–1674. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. White M (2007) Benthic dynamics at the carbonate mound regions of the Porcupine Sea Bight continental margin. Int J Earth Sci 96: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.White M, Mohn C, Stigter H, Mottram G (2005) Deep-water coral development as a function of hydrodynamics and surface productivity around the submarine banks of the Rockall Trough, NE Atlantic. In: Freiwald A, Roberts JM, editors. Cold-Water Corals and Ecosystems. Berlin: Springer. 503–514.
  • 54. Mienis F, de Stigter HC, de Haas H, van Weering TCE (2009) Near-bed particle deposition and resuspension in a cold-water coral mound area at the Southwest Rockall Trough margin, NE Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res Pt I 56: 1026–1038. [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Roberts JM, Long D, Wilson JB, Mortensen PB, Gage JD (2003) The cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa (Scleractinia) and enigmatic seabed mounds along the north-east Atlantic margin: are they related? Mar Pollut Bull 46: 7–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Dorschel B, Hebbeln D, Foubert A, White M, Wheeler AJ (2007) Hydrodynamics and cold-water coral facies distribution related to recent sedimentary processes at Galway Mound west of Ireland. Mar Geol 244: 184–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Davies AJ, Duineveld GCA, Lavaleye MSS, Bergman MJN, van Haren H, et al. (2009) Downwelling and deep-water bottom currents as food supply mechanisms to the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa (Scleractinia) at the Mingulay Reef Complex. Limnol Oceanogr 54: 620–629. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Lindberg B, Berndt C, Mienert J (2007) The Fugløy Reef at 70°N; acoustic signature, geologic, geomorphologic and oceanographic setting. Int J Earth Sci 96: 201–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Roberts JM, Peppe OC, Dodds LA, Mercer DJ, Thomson WT, et al. (2005) Monitoring environmental variability around cold-water coral reefs: the use of a benthic photolander and the potential of seafloor observatories. In: Freiwald A, Roberts J, editors. Cold-Water Corals and Ecosystems. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 483–502.
  • 60. Freiwald A, Wilson JB, Henrich R (1999) Grounding Pleistocene icebergs shape recent deep-water coral reefs. Sediment Geol 125: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 61. de Haas H, Mienis F, Frank N, Richter T, Steinacher R, et al. (2009) Morphology and sedimentology of (clustered) cold-water coral mounds at the south Rockall Trough margins, NE Atlantic Ocean. Facies 55: 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Thomsen L, Gust G (2000) Sediment erosion thresholds and characteristics of resuspended aggregates on the western European continental margin. Deep-Sea Res Pt I 47: 1881–1897. [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES