Abstract
Background
The aim of the study was to investigate the suppressive effects of pSilencer2.1-U6-siRNA-stat3 recombinant plasmids on the growth of ovarian cancer in vitro.
Material and methods.
Three pairs of DNA template (stat3-1, stat3-2, stat3-3) specific for different target sites on stat3 mRNA were synthesized to reconstruct pSilencer2.1-U6-siRNA-stat3s, which were transfected into SKOV3 cells. The expressions of STAT3, BcL-2, cyclin D1 and C-myc in these cells were detected by Western blot and Northern blot. The cell cycle and the growth were determined by flow cytometry (FCM) and MTT assay, respectively. Cell apoptosis was determined by TUNEL staining.
Results
Of the three siRNAs, only siRNA targeting stat3-3 markedly suppressed the protein expression of stat3 in SKOV3 cells; MTT assay and FCM showed that transfection of stat3-3 siRNA could significantly suppress the growth of SKOV3 cells and arrest the cell cycle in vitro. TUNEL staining also showed massive apoptosis in SKOV3 cells transfected with stat3-3 siRNA.
Conclusions
pSilencer2.1-U6-siRNA-stat3-3 can significantly inhibit the STAT3 expression in human ovarian cancer cells resulting in the inhibition of the cancer growth and the increase of apoptosis of cancer cells.
Keywords: RNA interference, stat3, SKOV3 cells, ovarian cancer, apoptosis
Introduction
Ovarian cancer, such as serous carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, metastatic carcinoma etc., is one of the common gynecological malignant tumors with high mortality. It is highly malignant and its incidence is increasing.1 Although great advances have been achieved in the radiotherapy and chemotherapy of ovarian cancer, the 5-year survival rate of ovarian cancer is not improved significantly.2 Further understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the proliferation, differentiation and survival of gynecological cancer cells is critical for the development of optimal therapeutic modalities. Although the molecular changes in the development of ovarian cancer are not completely understood, a lot of genes have been found to be involved in the occurrence and development of gynecological cancers.3,4 Thus, these genes may be useful targets in the development of specific antitumor therapeutic strategies. Studies have demonstrated the signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling pathway plays a key role in the carcinogenesis by promotion of proliferation, differentiation and cell cycle progression, as well as the inhibition of apoptosis.5,6 The constitutive activation of STAT3 is implicated in a variety of cancer cell lines7–11, which suggests stat3 may be an important molecular target for the anti-tumor therapy. Recent studies demonstrate the blockade of STAT3 expression in human cancer cells that suppresses the in vitro proliferation of cancer cells and the in vivo tumorigenicity. Attempts to suppress STAT3 expression have been made using tyrosine kinase inhibitors12,13, antisense oligonucleotides14, decoy oligonucleotides15, dominant-negative STAT3 protein16,17 and RNA interference (RNAi).18,19 In vitro studies have shown that the inhibition of STAT3 activity in human cancer cells can induce the apoptosis and/or the growth arrest. In human head and neck squamous carcinoma cells, prostate cancer cells, and laryngeal cancer cells, blocking of stat3 by decoy oligonucleotides or antisense oligonucleotides or siRNA abrogates the production of transforming growth factor (TGF) and suppresses the oncogenic growth of these cells.15 Furthermore, some studies have revealed some apoptosis-related genes, such as Bcl-xL, C-myc and cyclin D1, etc, that are involved in the STAT3 blockage induced suppression of cancer cell growth.
RNAi is triggered by the presence of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells and results in rapid degradation of targeted mRNA with homology to double strand RNA leading to potent and selective silencing of genes. RNAi provides a novel approach to inhibit gene expression, and to date, RNAi with siRNA has been applied as a functional genomic tool.20
In the present study, siRNA targeting stat3 gene was synthesized and siRNA-stat3 expression vectors were constructed with pSilencer 2.1-U6, which was then used to transfect human ovarian cancer cells (SKOV3 cells) aiming to inhibit the STAT3 expression and induce apoptosis of cancer cells. SKOV3 cells transfected with siRNA-stat3 were subcutaneously injected into nude mice and the growth and the apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells were observed.
Materials and methods
Immunohistochemistry for stat3 in the ovarian cancer
Twenty-five ovarian cancer samples and twenty fresh normal ovary tissues were collected for the determination of STAT3 expression. These tissues were embedded in paraffin and cut into 5-μm sections. After deparaffinization, the endogenous peroxidase was inactivated by 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10 min. The sections were treated with rabbit anti-human STAT3 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz, USA) and then with goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. The development was done at room temperature, using an avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method (Vectastain Elite ABC kit; Vector Laboratories). The criteria for grading of STAT3 expression were as follows: negative (−): ≤5% positive cells; low (+): 5∼25% positive cells; moderate (++): 25∼50% positive cells; strong (+++): 50∼100% positive cells).
Plasmid construction and determination
Three pairs of double stranded siRNA oligonucleotide against stat3 (stat3-1, stat3-2 and stat3-3) were designed according to the sequence of human stat3 gene (Genebank: NM003150). These oligonucleotides contain a sense strand with 19 nucleotides followed by a short spacer (TTCAAGAGA). The reverse complement of the sense strand has five thymines as a stop signal of RNA polymerase III transcription. The sequences of oligonucleotides were as follows:
stat3-1:5′ - GATTGACCTAGAGAC-CCACTTCAAGAGAGTGGGTCTCTAGGT-CAATCTTTTT-3′ (forward) and 5′-AATTAAAAAG ATTGACCTAGAGACCCACTCTCTTGAAGTG GTCTCTAGGTCAATCGGCC-3′ (reverse); stat3-2:5′-GAGTCGAATGTTCTCTATCTTCAAGAGAGATAGAGAACATTCGACTCTTTTT-3′ (forward); and 5′-AATTAAAAAGAG TCGAATGTTCTCTATCTCTCTTGAAGATAGA GAACATTCGACTCTGGCC-3′ (reverse); stat3-3:5′-GCAGCAGCTGAACAACATGCATGTTCAAGAGACATGTTGTTCAGCTGCTGCTTTTT-3′ (forward), and 5′-AATTAAAAAGCAGCAGCTGAACAACATGTCTCTTGAACATGTTGTTCAG CTGCTGCTGCGGCC-3′ (reverse).
These Oligos were annealed in the annealing buffer (100 mM K-actate, 30 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.4], 2 mM Mg-acetate, and the mixture was incubated at 90°C for 3 min and then at 37°C for 1 h) and cloned into the Hind III-BamH I sites of pSliencer 2.1-U6 vectors18 which can express hairpin siRNAs under the control of U6 promoter. The pSilencer2.1-U6 was linearized with the Hind III-BamH I restriction enzymes. The products with the double-stranded structure were used to form a recombinant plasmid with T4 DNA ligase followed by annealing. A negative control scrambled siRNA (Ambion, USA), which has no evident homology to mouse or human stat3 sequences, was also designed aiming to exclude non-specificity.
Cell culture and transfection
Human ovarian cancer cells (SKOV3 cells) were grown in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM) (Invitrogen, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). When the cell confluence reached 80∼90%, SKOV3 cells were washed three times with serum-free medium and divided into three groups: mock group, pSi-scramble siRNA group and pSi-stat3 siRNA group. LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) was used in the cell transfection, and enhanced green fluorescent protein vector (pEGFP; BD Clontech, Inc; USA) was cotransfected with either pSilencer 2.1-U6-stat3 siRNAs or pSi-lencer 2.1-U6-scrambled siRNA at a volume ratio of 1:20 to label the positive transfected cells. The transfection was performed for 5∼20 h and then the medium was refreshed with medium containing 10% FBS followed by lysis for 24∼72 h after the transfection.
mRNA quantification
Total RNA was extracted from tissues with Trizol (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For Northern blot analysis, 20 μg of total RNA were separated by 1.2% agarose-formaldehyde gel, and blotted onto Hybridization-N membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, USA). Hybridization was performed using the express Hyb buffer (BD Clontech, USA) with 32P-labeled cDNA of Survivin and actin as probes. Blots were exposed to Kodak MS film and then quantitated using a Molecular Dynamics Phosphorlmager.
Assay of growth and cell cycle in vitro
SKOV3 cells were incubated in 96-well plates. The cell proliferation was determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-y1)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma, USA) assay and the number of viable cells were counted with a hemocytometer at 72 h after the transfection. The absorbance at 570 nm (A570) was determined with a microplate reader. The growth inhibition rate was calculated according to the following formula:
A570c: A570 in control group; A570e: A570 in experimental group
For the assay of cell cycle, SKOV3 cells were transfected with siRNA-stat3s or siRNA-scrambled vectors. After 72 h of transfection, these cells were collected, washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 4 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and fixed in cold 70% ethanol followed by centrifugation. The supernatant was removed and cells were washed once with PBS containing 4 mmol/L EDTA. Cells were then re-suspended in PBS containing 4 mmol/L EDTA, 20 ml/L of propidium iodide (Sigma, USA), 0.2% Triton X-100, and 40 mg/L RNase A followed by incubation for at least 30 min at 4°C. The cell cycle was detected with a flow cytometer (FACScan, Becton Dickinson, USA) followed by the analysis with Cell Quest software. For the determination of apoptotic cells, 95 μl of floating cells were mixed with 0.1% AO/EB (acridine orange/ethidium bromide [Sigma, USA]) followed by the observation under a microscope.
In vivo growth of cancer cells
SKOV3 cells (3×106) were subcutaneously inoculated into the back of 18 nude mice. The tumor volume (m12×m2×0.5236, where m1 represents the short axis and m2 the longer axis) was measured every 2∼3 d until the tumors reached about 50.56±36.45 mm3 (by day 12) in volume. Then, these nude mice were randomized into three groups (n=6): (1) mock transfection group (PBS buffer alone); (2) scrambled vector group (20 μg/mouse); (3) pSilencer2.1-U6-stat3-siRNA group (20 μg/mouse). The plasmids were diluted in 50 μl of PBS and injected percutaneously into the tumors by using a syringe with a 27-gauge needle. Immediately after the injection, tumors were pulsed with an electroporation generator (ECM 830, BTX, USA). Pulses were delivered at a frequency of 1/sec and 150 v/cm for 50 ms. This process was repeated once a week, mice were sacrificed on day 33. The tumor volume was determined and then tumors were collected for H&E staining and terminal deoxynucleotidy1 transferase-mediated nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay.
HE staining and TUNEL assay
Serial sections of tumor tissues were fixed in formalin, stained with H&E, and processed for the routine histological examination. TUNEL assay was done by using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche, Switzerland). Paraffin-embedded tissues were cut into 3-μm sections, deparaffinized and hydrated according to the standard protocol. After the incubation with proteinase K (200 μg/ml) for 30 min at 21°C, the TUNEL reaction mixture containing bromodeoxyuridine triphosphate, terminal deoxynucleotidy1 transferase, and reaction buffer was added onto the sections which were incubated in a humidified chamber for 60 s at 37°C, followed by washing and incubation with a FITC-labeled anti-bromodeoxyuridine monoclonal antibody for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was visualized under a fluorescence microscope. TUNEL-positive cells present green fluorescence. The apoptotic index was calculated as follows: apoptotic index = (number of apoptotic cells/ number of total cells) ×100%.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was done with SPSS 13.0 statistic software package. The significance of the differences between various samples was determined using the student’s two-tailed t test. The comparisons between medians were performed with the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Stat3 is over-expressed in ovarian cancer cells and ovarian cancer tissues
The STAT3 expression in normal ovarian tissue (n=20), ovarian cancer tissues (n=25) and ovarian cancer cells (SKOV3 cells) was determined by using immunohistochemistry. Normal ovarian tissues showed low to moderate expression of Stat3. In contrast, primary ovarian cancer tissues and ovarian cancer cells had moderate to high expression of STAT3 (Figure1). Immunohistochemistry revealed that stat3 expressions in 85% of ovarian cancers were classified as ++ to +++, which were significantly different (P<0.001) from that in normal ovarian tissues (+).
Stat3-specific siRNA specifically reduces Stat3 expression in SKOV3 cells
Previous studies have provided strong evidence that siRNA specific to stat3 gene can significantly suppress STAT3 protein expression.18,19,21 To determine if STAT3 expression in the ovarian cancer can be suppressed via the gene-silencing effect of vector-based RNAi, the siRNAs targeting different sites of stat3 gene were designed previously which inhibited STAT3 expression significantly in prostate cancer cells.22 In the present study, SKOV3 cells were also transfected with siRNA and results showed only siRNA targeting stat3-3 could decrease the STAT3 expression significantly at both mRNA (Figure 2) and protein (Figure 3) levels when compared with scambled-siRNA. The siRNA targeting stat3-1 and stat3-2 had no significantly inhibitory effects on the mRNA and protein expressions of stat3.
Inhibition of stat3 suppresses expressions of BcL-2, cyclin D1, and c-Myc in SKOV3 cells
Constitutive activation of STAT3 induces the expressions of several genes including anti-apoptotic gene BcL-2, cyclin D1 and c-Myc which promote cell division. In order to determine whether these genes were involved in the Stat3-mediated apoptosis blocking in SKOV3 cells, Western blot assay was performed. Figure 4 shows that the BcL-2, cyclin D1 and c-Myc were highly expressed in the scrambled-siRNA transfected cells, whereas the expression levels of these proteins were significantly decreased after the transfection with siRNA-stat3.
Stat3 siRNA inhibits in vitro growth and survival, induces apoptosis of SKOV3 cells and arrests SKOV3 cells in G1 phase
In order to determine whether stat3-siRNA had inhibitory effects on the growth of SKOV3 cells, MTT assay was conducted to determine the cell proliferation. Results showed the cells transfected with siRNA-stat3 became less confluent and some cells were rounded and detached from the plates, when compared with cells transfected with scrambled vectors (Figure 5). AO/EB staining (nucleus condensation) was performed to detect the apoptotic cells. Results showed both early apoptotic and late apoptotic SKVO3 cells were seen in cells transfected with siRNA-stat3-3 (Figure 5). Flow cytometry revealed the apoptosis rate of siRNA-stat3-3 transfected cells was significantly higher than that of scrambled siRNA transfected cells (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Group | Apoptosis rate (%) |
---|---|
Mock | 0.02 ± 0.00 |
Scrambed siRNA | 2.49 ± 1.54 |
siRNA-Stat3-3 | 16.6 ± 3.43* |
P <0.05 vs. mock and scrambled groups.
In vivo anti-tumor activity of stat3 siRNA
In order to evaluate the effects of stat3-siRNA on the ovarian cancer growth in vivo, stat3-siRNA was injected into ovarian cancer bearing nude mice. Mice were subcutaneously inoculated with 3×106 SKOV3 cells and the tumors were palpable at the sites of injection on day 12. Then, the mice were intra-tumorally injected with PBS, scrambled-siRNA or siRNA-stat3-3. This process was repeated at days 19 and 26, and animals were killed on day 33. The mean tumor volume in mice treated with scrambled siRNA was 767.65±100.23 mm3, and that in mice treated with siRNA stat3-3 was 298.23±19.89 mm3, showing the significant difference in tumor volume between these two groups. However, there was no marked difference between mice transfected with scrambled-siRNA and those treated with buffer (P>0.05) (Figure 6). To determine the mechanism of suppressed cancer growth in vivo, tumors were collected for H&E staining and TUNEL staining. Results showed siRNA-stat3-3 transfected cells underwent massive apoptosis with sparsely dispersed chromatin and necrotic tissue (Figure 6) and several TUNEL-positive cells or cell clusters (Figure 6), which was seldom found in the other two groups. These findings demonstrate the intra-tumoral administration of stat3-3 siRNA exerts potent suppressive effects on the cancer growth.
Discussion
Under physiological conditions, STAT3 activation is a rapid process and activated STAT3 has short half life. The study has demonstrated stat3 plays an important role in maintaining physiological functions of cells. STAT3 is a critical element in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), interleukin-6 (IL-6)/Janus kinase (JAK) and other carcinogenic tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. Evidence reveals STAT3 is expressed in a variety of human malignancies, including leukemia, multiple myeloma, multiple melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), breast cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer and lung cancer. The activated stat3 plays crucial roles in the occurrence, growth, apoptosis inhibition of cancer cells.23–25 Rosen et al.26 indicated the persistent activation of STAT3 signal transduction was very important in the occurrence of ovarian cancer and could promote the cell proliferation resulting in occurrence of cancers. The persistent activation of STAT3 helps the cancer development, and a high expression of STAT3 also indicates a poor prognosis of the cancer. Therefore, stat3 can be used as a novel target for the anti-cancer therapy and may become a novel cancer marker.
Our results showed the STAT3 expression was significantly increased in human ovarian cancer when compared with that in normal ovary tissues. Among the three pairs of double stranded siRNA oligonucleotide against stat3, only siRNA targeting stat3-3 could markedly inhibit the STAT3 expression in SKOV3 cells demonstrated by Western Blot and Northern Blot. Then, siRNA-stat3-3 was used to transfect SKOV3 cells for further experiments. Results revealed transfection with siRNA-stat3 significantly decreased the expressions of BcL-2, cyclin D1 and c-Myc in SKOV3 cells. In addition, stat3 siRNA inhibits the in vitro growth and survival, induces apoptosis of SKOV3 cells and arrests SKOV3 cells in G1 phase. Furthermore, the anti-tumor effects of stat3 siRNA were also confirmed in ovarian cancer bearing nude mice. Taken together, these findings demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor effects of stat3 siRNA.
Our results were similar to that of Cai et al.27 in which they also found the anti-tumor effects of stat3 siRNA in vitro and in vivo. However, in the present study, we designed three pairs of double stranded siRNA oligonucleotide against stat3, and the most effective siRNA in the inhibition of STAT3 expression was selected. In addition, the suppressed expression of stat3 was confirmed by Western Blot and Northern Blot at protein and mRNA levels, respectively. In the in vivo experiment, we detected not only changes of the tumor size but also the apoptosis of cancer cells in the tumors. In 2008, Huang et al. applied shRNA to knockdown stat3 expression in CAOV3 ovarian cancer cell line demonstrating similar results.28 Their results suggest RNA interference is an effective and feasible strategy to down-regulate stat3 expression in the treatment of ovarian cancer.
Bcl-2 is the founding member of the Bcl-2 family of apoptosis regulator proteins. The Bcl-2 gene has been implicated in a number of cancers. It is also thought to be involved in resistance to the conventional cancer treatment.29 Cyclin-D1, in humans is encoded by the CCND1 gene, that belongs to the highly conserved cyclin family whose members are characterized by a dramatic periodicity in protein abundance throughout the cell cycle. Mutations, amplification and over-expression of CCND1 gene, which alters the cell cycle progression, are observed frequently in a variety of tumors and may contribute to tumorigenesis.30 c-Myc protein is a transcription factor that activates the expression of a great number of genes through binding on consensus sequences and recruiting histone acetyltransferases (HATs). Myc gene is a very strong proto-oncogene and very often found to be up-regulated in many types of cancers.31 Based on the results of the present study, we speculated that the anti-tumor effects of siRNA targeting stat3 may be related to the cell cycle arrest and promotion of the apoptosis of cancer cells.
In summary, our results indicate stat3 siRNA treatment can significantly inhibit the growth of ovarian cancer cells and promote their apoptosis. Thus, we postulate that STAT3 can be used as a therapeutic target for ovarian cancer patients and RNA interference with siRNA targeting stat3 may become an effective strategy for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
References
- 1.Klint A, Tryggvadóttir L, Bray F, Gislum M, Hakulinen T, Storm HH, et al. Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in female genital organs in the Nordic countries 1964–2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:632–43. doi: 10.3109/02841861003691945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lenhard SM, Bufe A, Kümper C, Stieber P, Mayr D, Hertlein L, et al. Relapse and survival in early-stage ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280:71–7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0877-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang Z, Zhou B, Zhang J, Chen Y, Lai T, Yan L, et al. Association of interleukin-23 receptor gene polymorphisms with risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010;196:146–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shih leM, Davidson B. Pathogenesis of ovarian cancer: clues from selected overexpressed genes. Future Oncol. 2009;5:1641–57. doi: 10.2217/fon.09.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Darnell JE., Jr STATs and gene regulation. Science. 1997;277:1630–5. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5332.1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lu Y, Fukuyama S, Yoshida R, Kobayashi T, Saeki K, Shiraishi H, et al. Loss of SOCS3 gene expression converts STAT3 function from anti-apoptotic to pro-apoptotic. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:36683–90. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M607374200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garcia R, Yu CL, Hudnall A, Catlett R, Nelson KL, Smithgall T, et al. Constitutive activation of STAT3 in fibroblasts transformed by diverse onco-proteins and in breast carcinoma cells. Cell Growth Differ. 1997;8:1267–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Garcia R, Bowman TL, Niu G, Yu H, Minton S, Muro-Cacho CA, et al. Constitutive activation of STAT3 by the Src and JAK tyrosine kinases participates in growth regulation of human breast carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2010;20:2499–513. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Buettner R, Mora LB, Jove R. Activated STAT signaling in human tumors provides novel molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:945–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takemoto S, Mulloy JC, Cereseto A, Migone TS, Patel BK, Matsuoka M, et al. Proliferation of adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma cells is associated with the constitutive activation of JAK/STAT proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:13897–902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gouilleux-Gruart V, Gouilleux F, Desaint C, Claisse JF, Capiod JC, Delobel J, et al. STAT-related transcription factors are constitutively activated in peripheral blood cells from acute leukemia patients. Blood. 1996;87:1692–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Levitzki A. Tyrosine kinases as targets for cancer therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:S11–8. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)80598-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Blaskovich MA, Sun J, Cantor A, Turkson J, Jove R, Sebti SM. Discovery of JSI-124 (cucurbitacin I), a selective Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway inhibitor with potent antitumor activity against human and murine cancer cells in mice. Cancer Res. 2003;63:1270–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bromberg J, Darnell JE., Jr The role of STATs in transcriptional control and their impact on cellular function. Oncogene. 2000;19:2468–73. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Leong PL, Andrews GA, Johnson DE, Dyer KF, Xi S, Mai JC, et al. Targeted inhibition of STAT3 with a decoy oligonucleotide abrogates head and neck cancer cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:4138–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0534764100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ni Z, Lou W, Leman ES, Gao AC. Inhibition of constitutively activated STAT3 signaling pathway suppresses growth of prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2000;60:1225–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang J, Shen B, Li Y, Sun Y. STAT3 exerts two-way regulation in the biological effects of IL-6 in M1 leukemia cells. Leuk Res. 2001;25:463–72. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(00)00157-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee SO, Lou W, Qureshi KM, Mehraein-Ghomi F, Trump DL, et al. RNA interference targeting STAT3 inhibits growth and induces apoptosis of human prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 2004;60:303–9. doi: 10.1002/pros.20072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Konnikova L, Kotecki M, Kruger MM, Cochran BH. Knock-down of STAT3 expression by RNAi induces apoptosis in astrocytoma cells. BMC Cancer. 2003;3:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-3-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mesojednik S, Kamensek U, Cemazar M. Evaluation of shRNA-mediated gene silencing by electroporation in LPB fibrosarcoma cells. Radiol Oncol. 2008;42:82–92. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Grandis JR, Zheng Q, Drenning SD. Epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated stat3 signaling blocks apoptosis in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:868–74. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200005000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gao L, Zhang L, Hu J, Li F, Shao Y, Zhao D, et al. Down-regulation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 expression using vector-based small Interfering RNAs suppresses growth of human prostate tumor in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:6333–41. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fernandes A, Hamburger AW, Gerwin BI. ErbB-2 kinase is required for constitutive STAT3 activation in malignant human lung epithelial cells. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:564–70. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991112)83:4<564::aid-ijc20>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nagpal JK, Mishra R, Das BR. Activation of Stat3 as one of the early events in tobacco chewing-mediated oral carcinogenesis. Cancer. 2002;94:2393–400. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hsieh FC, Cheng G, Lin J. Evaluation of potential Stat3-regulated genes in human breast cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;335:292–99. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rosen DG, Mercado-Uribe I, Yang G, Bast RC, Jr, Amin HM, Lai R, et al. The role of constitutively active signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in ovarian tumorigenesis and prognosis. Cancer. 2006;107:2730–40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cai L, Zhang G, Tong X, You Q, An Y, Wang Y, et al. Growth inhibition of human ovarian cancer cells by blocking STAT3 activation with small interfering RNA. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang F, Tong X, Fu L, Zhang R. Knockdown of STAT3 by shRNA inhibits the growth of CAOV3 ovarian cancer cell line in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2008;40:519–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2008.00424.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ciardiello F, Tortora G. Inhibition of bcl-2 as cancer therapy. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:501–2. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hayakawa Y, Hirata Y, Nakagawa H, Sakamoto K, Hikiba Y, Kinoshita H, et al. Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 and cyclin D1 compose a positive feedback loop contributing to tumor growth in gastric cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:780–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011418108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bressin C, Bourgarel-Rey V, Carré M, Pourroy B, Arango D, Braguer D, et al. Decrease in c-Myc activity enhances cancer cell sensitivity to vinblastine. Anticancer Drugs. 2006;17:181–7. doi: 10.1097/00001813-200602000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]