Synopsis
This article presents an overview of the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as relevant to the practicing anesthesiologist. Key concepts surrounding the pathophysiology, anesthetic principles are used to describe potential ways to reduce secondary insults and improve outcomes after TBI.
Keywords: perioperative management, cerebral resuscitation
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem and a leading cause of death and disability.1 Approximately 1.7 million people sustain TBI annually in the United States, accounting for 275,000 hospitalizations and 52,000 deaths.1 Traumatic brain injury is a contributing factor in about one-third of all trauma deaths and affects primarily children aged 0-4 years, adolescents aged 15-19 years and elderly aged ≥ 65 years with males being more affected.1 Falls and motor vehicle-traffic injury are the leading causes of TBI in the United States.1 Multidisciplinary research efforts have led to the development of evidence-based guidelines for pre-hospital and intensive care management of TBI.2-13 However, evidence-based guidelines specific for intraoperative and anesthetic management do not exist and intraoperative recommendations are frequently based on extrapolation from these other guidelines, physiological and pharmacological data and limited direct evidence.
Pathophysiology of Traumatic Brain Injury
Following TBI, the primary injury to the brain is caused by the initial mechanical impact resulting in skull fracture, brain contusion, vascular and parenchymal injury causing intracranial bleed and increased intracranial pressure (ICP).14 This is followed by an inflammatory process, edema formation and excitotoxicity, resulting in further increase in ICP and reduced cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP).14,15 While the severity of primary injury is the major factor determining the outcome of TBI patients, secondary damage to the brain tissue caused by physiological perturbations (secondary insults) contribute further to the worsening of outcomes.14,15 The most important secondary insults are hypotension [systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg in adult patients] and hypoxemia (PaO2 < 60 mmHg)16 which are independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality from severe TBI.17-19 Other common secondary insults include hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, hypercarbia, hypocarbia, and raised ICP.20-25 All these can manifest both early and late in the course of TBI (Table 1). Moreover, the consequences of TBI may be evident in other organ and systems besides the brain and may require prompt attention (Table 2).Sections▼
Table 1. Time Course and Mechanisms of Secondary Insults in Traumatic Brain Injury.
Secondary Insult | Early Causes | Delayed Causes |
---|---|---|
Hypoxemia | Aspiration Apnea Pneumothorax Pulmonary Contusion Endobronchial Intubation Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema |
Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia Transfusion Related Acute Lung Injury Pulmonary Embolism |
Hypotension | Associated High Spinal Cord Injury Long Bone Fracture Thoracic/Abdominal bleeding |
Shock Sepsis |
Hypercarbia | Apnea Brainstem Injury Inadequate Ventilation |
Iatrogenic (opioids) Pneumonia |
Hypocarbia | Unwanted Hyperventilation | Unwanted hyperventilation |
Hyperglycemia | Stress | Persistent/New onset |
Seizures | Electrolyte Abnormalities Hypoglycemia |
Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone |
Vasospasm | - | In patients with traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage |
Intracranial Hypertension |
Mass effect of hematoma Herniation |
Cerebral edema |
Table 2. Multisystem Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury.
Cardiopulmonary |
|
Metabolic |
|
Autonomic Dysfunction Syndrome |
|
Endocrine |
|
Hematologic |
|
Gastrointestinal |
|
Importance of Perioperative Period
Current TBI management focuses on prevention of primary injury and avoidance of secondary injuries. The key elements of TBI management are early resuscitation and hemodynamic optimization, emergent surgical evacuation of mass lesions, control of ICP, support of CPP and optimization of physiological milieu. The immediate perioperative period may be particularly important in the course of TBI management because despite the aggressive interventions to rapidly correct hypoxemia, hypotension, hypo and hypercarbia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia in the emergency department, one or more of these complicating factors may persist or remain undetected as the patient is transported to the operating room. Hence, the perioperative period provides an opportunity to continue and refine ongoing resuscitation, and to correct pre-existing secondary insults. Moreover, surgery and anesthesia may predispose to new onset secondary insults, which may contribute adversely to outcomes.
Since secondary injury is potentially preventable and treatable, the perioperative period may be a window to initiate interventions that may improve the outcome of TBI. Perioperative management involves rapid evaluation, continuation of resuscitation (cerebral and systemic), early surgical intervention, intensive monitoring and anesthetic planning.
Initial Assessment and Ongoing Resuscitation
The initial assessment and stabilization is usually achieved as soon as the patient arrives in the emergency department. Nevertheless, another rapid but relevant assessment should be performed as the patient is received in the operating room. This should involve evaluation of airway, breathing and circulation, a rapid assessment of neurological status and associated extracranial injuries as well as evaluation of anemia, coagulopathy, glycemia and the presence of adequate vascular access. Information about time and mechanism of injury can be valuable. Brief neurological assessment is performed using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)26 score and pupillary responses. Associated thoracic, abdominal, spinal and long bone injuries may be stable or evolve during the perioperative period and must be considered in differential diagnosis of new onset hypotension, anemia, hemodynamic instability or hypoxemia during anesthesia and surgery.
Airway Management
While many patients arrive in the operating room already intubated, some, particularly those with extradural hematoma, may be conscious and breathing spontaneously. Airway management in TBI is complicated by a number of factors, including urgency of situation (because of pre-existing or worsening hypoxia), uncertainty of cervical spine status, uncertainty of airway (due to presence of blood, vomitus, debris in the oral cavity or due to laryngo-pharyngeal injury or skull base fracture), full stomach, intracranial hypertension and uncertain volume status. All TBI patients requiring urgent surgery must be considered to have full stomach and airway management must account for possible underlying cervical spine injury.27,28
Technique - best practices
The choice of technique for tracheal intubation is determined by urgency, individual expertise and available resources and generally incorporates rapid sequence intubation with cricoid pressure and manual in-line stabilization.29 The anterior portion of the cervical collar may be removed when manual in-line stabilization is established to allow greater mouth opening and facilitate laryngoscopy. Newer airway devises, particularly videolaryngoscopes, have gained popularity in recent years for use in trauma victims and may be useful in difficult airway scenarios.30 Nasal intubation should be avoided in patients with base of skull fracture, severe facial fractures or bleeding diathesis. In any case, it is advisable to have a back-up plan ready in case of difficult intubation, given the significant risk of intracranial hypertension resulting from increased cerebral blood volume (CBV) because of hypoxemia and hypercarbia.
Appropriate pharmacological selection is important for uncomplicated airway management. Sodium thiopental, etomidate and propofol decrease cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen (CMRO2) and attenuate increases in ICP with intubation. However, propofol and thiopental may cause cardiovascular depression leading to hypotension. Etomidate offers the advantage of hemodynamic stability during induction but may cause adrenal insufficiency leading to delayed hypotension.31 Ketamine, which causes limited cardiovascular compromise, has been associated with increased cerebral blood flow (CBF) and increased ICP, and may be relatively contraindicated for intubating patients with pre-existing intracranial hypertension.32 The choice of muscle relaxant for rapid sequence induction is between succinylcholine and rocuronium.33 Succinylcholine may contribute to increased ICP,34,35 the clinical significance of which is questionable.36,37 More importantly, hypoxia and hypercarbia during airway interventions are more likely to cause clinically significant increases in ICP. Hence, in patients with TBI, succinylcholine may not be avoided if difficult airway is anticipated.37
Anesthetic Management
The major goals of anesthetic management of TBI are to facilitate early decompression, provide adequate analgesia and amnesia, treat intracranial hypertension and maintain adequate cerebral perfusion, provide optimal surgical conditions, and avoid secondary insults such as hypoxemia, hyper and hypocarbia, hypo and hyperglycemia.
Anesthetic technique
Intravenous anesthetic agents including thiopental, propofol and etomidate cause cerebral vasoconstriction and reduce CBF, cerebral blood volume, CMRO2 and ICP.38 Opioids have no direct effects on cerebral hemodynamics when the ventilation is controlled.39 All volatile anesthetic agents (isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane) decrease CMRO2 but may cause cerebral vasodilation, resulting in raised ICP. However, at less than 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) concentration, the cerebral vasodilatory effects are minimal and hence inhaled anesthetics may be used in low concentrations in patients with TBI.40 Nitrous oxide should be avoided since it increases CMRO2 and causes cerebral vasodilation and increased ICP.41 Importantly, the effects of anesthetic agents on outcome of TBI have not been demonstrated and inhaled as well as intravenous anesthetic agents may be used judiciously. More importantly, the principles of anesthetic management should adhere to the guidelines for the management of severe TBI (Table 3).2-13
Table 3. Recommendations from the 2007 guidelines for management of severe traumatic brain injury[2-13].
Parameters | Recommendations |
---|---|
Blood pressure |
|
Oxygenation |
|
Hyperventilation |
|
Hyperosmolar therapy |
|
ICP |
|
Temperature |
|
CPP |
|
Brain Oxygenation |
|
Steroids |
|
Ventilation
Ventilation should be adjusted to ensure adequate oxygenation (PaO2 > 60 mmHg) and normocarbia (PaCO2 35-45 mmHg). Monitoring arterial PaCO2 is recommended and hypercarbia (PaCO2 > 45 mmHg) induced increases in CBF resulting in further increased ICP should be avoided.12 Hyperventilation should be used judiciously for short-term control of ICP and to facilitate surgical exposure during craniotomy. Excessive and prolonged hyperventilation may cause cerebral vasoconstriction leading to ischemia. Normocarbia should be restored before dural closure. It is ideal to monitor cerebral oxygenation and CBF during prolonged hyperventilation. In the intraoperative period, this may be accomplished by jugular venous oximetry9,42 and in the postoperative period by brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) or CBF monitoring (e.g. using Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography).9
Monitoring
In addition to standard American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) monitors, arterial catheterization is recommended for continuous blood pressure monitoring, blood gas analysis and glucose sampling in patients who require surgical intervention. Central venous catheterization may be useful for resuscitation but it is advisable not to delay surgical evacuation of expanding intracranial hematoma for the institution of invasive monitoring. According to the current guidelines, ICP monitoring is recommended in all salvageable patients with a severe TBI (GCS < 9) and an abnormal CT scan (hematomas, contusions, swelling, herniation or compressed basal cistern), and in patients with severe TBI with a normal CT scan if two or more of the following features are present: age > 40 years, unilateral/bilateral motor posturing, or SBP < 90 mmHg.5 The use of multimodal monitoring for postoperative and intensive care of patients with TBI is increasing and monitoring cerebral oxygenation (global or focal) or CBF and metabolism parameters may be helpful in making important treatment decisions.9 Jugular venous oximetry is often useful for assessment of adequacy of global cerebral oxygenation.43 The indications are generally the same as those for ICP monitoring and jugular venous oxygen saturation values < 50% may indicate the need to optimize ventilation, systemic hemodynamics or institute ICP lowering measures.43 Brain tissue oxygen monitors have the advantage of identifying focal areas of ischemia which may not be picked up by jugular venous oximetry.43 Brain tissue PO2 < 15 mmHg indicates ischemia.43 Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) offers the capacity to conveniently and non-invasively monitor cerebral oxygen in the intensive care unit.43 Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography is a non-invasive, nonradioactive, bedside monitor, which can provide useful instantaneous cerebrovascular information including changes in cerebral blood flow velocity, cerebral vasospasm and autoregulation.44
Intravenous Fluids, Blood Pressure Management and Vasopressor Use
Hypotension following TBI is well known to adversely affect outcomes. Therefore, blood pressure management, including choice of fluids and vasopressors, is of paramount importance. Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines for the management of TBI recommend avoiding hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg) and maintaining CPP between 50 and 70 mmHg.2,8 Hypotension during craniotomy also contributes to adverse outcomes and is frequently encountered at the time of dural opening.45 This “decompression hypotension” may be predicted by low GCS score, absence of mesencephalic cisterns on computed tomographic (CT) scan and bilateral dilated pupils.45 Moreover, the presence of multiple CT lesions, subdural hematoma, maximum thickness of CT lesion and longer duration of anesthesia increase the risk for intraoperative hypotension, and anesthesiologists can use the presence of these factors to anticipate and expediently address these complications.46 Perioperative hypotension should be treated promptly. Warm, non-glucose containing isotonic crystalloid solution is preferable for intravenous administration in TBI patients. The role of colloid, however, is controversial. A post-hoc analysis of the Saline versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation (SAFE) study demonstrated that resuscitation with albumin was associated with higher mortality and unfavorable neurological outcome at 24 months.47 Hypertonic saline may be beneficial resuscitation fluid for TBI patients because it increases intravascular fluid and decreases ICP. However, a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing prehospital resuscitation of hypotensive TBI patients with hypertonic saline with standard fluid resuscitation protocols found no difference in neurological outcome at 6 months.48 Data comparing the effectiveness of commonly used vasopressors in TBI are limited and indicate that the effects of norepinephrine and dopamine on cerebral blood flow velocity49,50 and cerebral oxygenation or metabolism51 are comparable but the former produces more predictable and consistent effect50 while the later may lead to higher ICP.49 A recent single-center retrospective study of patients with severe TBI who received phenylephrine, norepinephrine or dopamine reported maximum increase in MAP and CPP from baseline with phenylephrine use with no difference in ICP.52 Current evidence does not support preference of one vasopressor over the other to support cerebral perfusion and the choice may have to be individualized to patient characteristics.
Blood Transfusion
Anemia is associated with increased in-hospital mortality53 and poor outcome in TBI.54,55 Yet, there is little evidence to support red blood cell transfusion to correct anemia in TBI. Anemia may cause cerebral injury via various possible mechanisms including tissue hypoxia, reactive oxygen species induced damage, inflammation, disruption of blood-brain barrier (BBB) function, vascular thrombosis and anemic cerebral hyperemia.56 It may also impair cerebral autoregulation.57 However, a number of cerebroprotective physiological mechanisms become effective with anemia which include aortic chemoreceptor activation, increased sympathetic activity leading to increased heart rate, stroke volume and cardiac index, reduced systemic vascular resistance, and enhanced oxygen extraction. Moreover, a number of cellular mechanisms of cerebral protection become effective. These include increased Hypoxia Inducible Factor (HIF), nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide in the brain (nNOS/NO), erythropoietin and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mediated angiogenesis and vascular repair.56 Besides increasing the oxygen-carrier capacity of blood, red blood cell transfusion increases the circulating volume and can increase CBF in patients with impaired cerebral autoregulation secondary to the TBI. However, most studies have failed to demonstrate a consistent improvement in brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) with blood transfusion.58,59 In fact, the increased hematocrit after red cell transfusion may potentially decrease CBF and increase the risk of cerebral ischemia.60 The overall effects of anemia on the brain may depend on the relative balance between the competing protective and harmful factors of anemia and blood transfusion, and it is unclear whether transfusion trigger in patients with TBI should be any different from other critically ill patients. Although the optimal hemoglobin level in TBI patients is unclear, there is no benefit of a liberal transfusion strategy (transfusion when Hb <10 g/dl) in moderate to severe TBI patients and it is not recommended.55
Coagulopathy and Factor VII
Coagulation disorders may be present in approximately one-third TBI patients and is associated with an increased mortality and poor outcome.61 Brain injury leads to the release of tissue factor. Later, pro-coagulant factors are activated resulting in thrombin formation and conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) inhibits the antithrombotic mechanism, causing imbalance of coagulation and fibrinolysis. Patients with GCS ≤8, Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16, associated cerebral edema, subarachnoid hemorrhage and midline shift are likely to have coagulopathy.62 Currently, there are no guidelines for management of coagulopathy in TBI although hemostatic agents including antifibrinolytic agents such as transexamic acid and pro-coagulant drugs such as recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) are sometimes used. A Cochrane review found two randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of rFVIIa, but both the trails were too small to draw a conclusion regarding the effectiveness of rFVIIa for TBI patients.63 The Clinical Randomization of Antifibrinolytics in Significant Hemorrhage (CRASH-2) trial, a large international placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effect of transexamic acid on death, vascular occlusion events and blood transfusion in adult trauma patients, demonstrated that transexamic acid was associated with a reduction of mortality.64
Hyperosmolar Therapy
Mannitol is commonly used for hyperosmolar therapy and there is no level-1 evidence supporting the use of one agent over another. The recommended dose of mannitol is 0.25-1 g/kg body weight. Due to osmotic diuresis, which can result in hypovolemia and hypotension, it is recommended only in presence of signs of transtentorial herniation or progressive neurological deterioration not attributable to extracranial causes.3 In patients with severe TBI and elevated ICP refractory to mannitol treatment, 7.5% hypertonic saline administered as second tier therapy can increase cerebral oxygenation and improve cerebral and systemic hemodynamics.65
Glycemic Control
Hyperglycemia after TBI is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.66-68 It is unclear to what extent it reflects the injury severity,69 or contributes to worse outcomes by itself.69,70 Nevertheless, hyperglycemia can cause secondary brain injury, leading to increased glycolytic rates evidenced by increased lactate/pyruvate ratio, resulting in metabolic acidosis within brain parenchyma, overproduction of reactive oxygen species, and ultimately neuronal cell death.69-72 Some early studies reported lower mortality with that intensive insulin therapy (target blood glucose 80-110 mg/dl) in critically ill patients.73 However, more recent studies not only failed to demonstrate the mortality benefit of intensive insulin therapy but also found an increased risk of hypoglycemia.74.75 Hence, tight glucose control with intensive insulin therapy remains controversial. While a number of studies have investigated hyperglycemia in adult TBI in different contexts (admission vs. ICU, transient vs. persistent, early vs. late, etc.), the intraoperative data are scarce. Nonetheless, intraoperative hyperglycemia is common in adults undergoing urgent/emergent craniotomy for TBI with up to 15% patients experiencing new onset hyperglycemia which may be predicted by severe TBI, the presence of subdural hematoma, preoperative hyperglycemia, and age ≥ 65 years. Similarly, perioperative hyperglycemia during craniotomy for TBI is common in children, hypoglycemia in the absence of insulin treatment is not rare, and TBI severity and the presence of subdural hematoma predict intraoperative hyperglycemia.68 Given the current evidence for glucose control for TBI in perioperative period, a target glucose range of 80-180 mg/dl seems reasonable.
Therapeutic Hypothermia and Steroids
Hypothermia reduces cerebral metabolism during stress, reduces excitatory neurotransmitters release, attenuates BBB permeability, and has been used for brain protection in TBI patients for decades. Yet, clinical evidence in terms of mortality and functional outcomes is still inconclusive. A recent meta-analysis reported statistically insignificant reduction in mortality and increased favorable neurological outcome with hypothermia in TBI.76 The benefits of hypothermia were greater when cooling was maintained for more than 48 hours, but the potential benefits of hypothermia may likely be offset by a significant increase in the risk of pneumonia.76 These observations support previous findings that hypothermic therapy constitutes a beneficial treatment of TBI in specific circumstances. Accordingly, the BTF/AANS guidelines task force has issued a Level III recommendation for optional and cautious use of hypothermia for adults with TBI.4 Steroids have not been shown to improve outcomes or lower ICP in TBI.13 In fact, findings from a randomized multicenter study on the effect of corticosteroids (MRC CRASH trail) showed that administration of methylprednisolone within 8 hours of TBI was associated with higher risk of death, and the risk of death or severe disability was more compared to placebo.77 Therefore, the use of high-dose methylprednisolone is contraindicated in patients with moderate or severe TBI.13
Summary
The Perioperative period is a critical period for TBI management and TBI outcomes. While it may predispose the patient to new onset secondary injuries which may contribute adversely to outcomes, it is also an opportunity to detect and correct undiagnosed pre-existing secondary insults. It may also be a potential window to initiate interventions that may improve the outcome of TBI. While more research focused specifically on the intraoperative and perioperative TBI management is awaited, clinical management should continue to be based on physiological optimization.
Key Points.
Traumatic brain injury is a major public health concern.
Secondary insults are common after TBI and include physiological derangements such as hypotension, hypocarbia, hyperglycemia and hypoxemia.
The perioperative period is window of opportunity for anesthesiologists to prevent and reduce the burden of secondary insults after TBI.
The choice of anesthetic agent must consider the pathophysiological processes after TBI as well as the effects of the anesthetic agents.
Acknowledgments
Funding Support: 5R01NS072308-02
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Atlanta (GA): 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartle R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury Blood pressure and oxygenation. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S7–13. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartle R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury II. Hyperosmolar therapy. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S14–20. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury III Prophylactic hypothermia. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S21–5. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S37–44. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VII. Intracranial pressure monitoring technology. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S45–54. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VIII. Intracranial pressure thresholds. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S55–8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. IX. Cerebral perfusion thresholds. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S59–64. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. X. Brain oxygen monitoring and thresholds. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S65–70. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. XI. Anesthetics, analgesics, and sedatives. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S71–6. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. XIII. Antiseizure prophylaxis. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S83–6. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. XIV. Hyperventilation. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S87–90. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. XV. Steroids. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S91–5. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.9981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Greve MW, Zink BJ. Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76:97–104. doi: 10.1002/msj.20104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Werner C, Engelhard K. Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:4–9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, Blunt BA, Baldwin N, Eisenberg HM, et al. The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma. 1993;34:216–22. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199302000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marshall LF, Becker DP, Bowers SA, Cayard C, Eisenberg H, Gross CR, et al. The National Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Part 1: Design, purpose, goals, and results. J Neurosurg. 1983;59:276–84. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.2.0276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McHugh GS, Engel DC, Butcher I, Steyerberg EW, Lu J, Mushkudiani N, et al. Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury: Results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:287–93. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pietropaoli JA, Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Wald SL, Schmoker JD, Zhuang J. The deleterious effects of intraoperative hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head injuries. J Trauma. 1992;33:403–7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199209000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu-DeRyke X, Collingridge DS, Orme J, Roller D, Zurasky J, Rhoney DH. Clinical impact of early hyperglycemia during acute phase of traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11:151–7. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9228-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jeremitsky E, Omert LA, Dunham CM, Wilberger J, Rodriguez A. The impact of hyperglycemia on patients with severe brain injury. J Trauma. 2005;58:47–50. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000135158.42242.b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Griesdale DE, Tremblay MH, McEwen J, Chittock DR. Glucose Control and Mortality in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11:311–6. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9249-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sharma D, Jelacic J, Chennuri R, Chaiwat O, Chandler W, Vavilala MS. Incidence and risk factors for perioperative hyperglycemia in children with traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:81–9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818a6f32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Warner KJ, Cuschieri J, Copass MK, Jurkovich GJ, Bulger EM. The impact of prehospital ventilation on outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2007;62:1330–6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31804a8032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dumont TM, Visioni AJ, Rughani AI, Tranmer BI, Crookes B. Inappropriate prehospital ventilation in severe traumatic brain injury increases in-hospital mortality. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:1233–41. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Holly LT, Kelly DF, Counelis GJ, Blinman T, McArthur DL, Cryer HG. Cervical spine trauma associated with moderate and severe head injury: Incidence, risk factors, and injury characteristics. J Neurosurg (Spine 3) 2002;69:285–291. doi: 10.3171/spi.2002.96.3.0285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Demetriades D, Charalambides K, Chahwan S, Hanpeter S, Alo K, Velmahos G, et al. Nonskeletal cervical spine injuries: Epidemiology and diagnostic pitfalls. J Trauma. 2000;48:724–7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200004000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Crosby ET. Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:1293–318. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200606000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Platts-Mills TF, Campagne D, Chinnock B, Snowden B, Glickman LT, Hendey GW. A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16:866–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cohan P, Wang C, McArthur DL, Cook SW, Dusick JR, Armin B, et al. Acute secondary adrenal insufficiency after traumatic brain injury: A prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2358–66. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000181735.51183.a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schulte am Esch J, Pfeifer G, Thiemig I, Entzian W. The influence of intravenous anaesthetic agents on primarily increased intracranial pressure. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1978;45:15–25. doi: 10.1007/BF01774380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Perry JJ, Lee JS, Sillberg VA, Wells GA. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD002788. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002788.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Minton MD, Grosslight K, Stirt JA, Bedford RF. Increases in intracranial pressure from succinylcholine: Prevention by prior nondepolarizing blockade. Anesthesiology. 1986;65:165–9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198608000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stirt JA, Grosslight KR, Bedford RF, Vollmer D. Defasciculation“ with metocurine prevents succinylcholine-induced increases in intracranial pressure. Anesthesiology. 1987;67:50–3. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198707000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kovarik WD, Mayberg TS, Lam AM, Mathisen TL, Winn HR. Succinylcholine does not change intracranial pressure, cerebral blood flow velocity, or the electroencephalogram in patients with neurologic injury. Anesth Analg. 1994;78:469–73. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199403000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Clancy M, Halford S, Walls R, Murphy M. In patients with head injuries who undergo rapid sequence intubation using succinylcholine, does pretreatment with a competitive neuromuscular blocking agent improve outcome? A literature review. Emerg Med J. 2001;18:373–5. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.5.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Turner BK, Wakim JH, Secrest J, Zachary R. Neuroprotective effects of thiopental, propofol, and etomidate. AANA J. 2005;73:297–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schregel W, Weyerer W, Cunitz G. Opioids, cerebral circulation and intracranial pressure. Anaesthesist. 1994;43:421–30. doi: 10.1007/s001010050074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Engelhard K, Werner C. Inhalational or intravenous anesthetics for craniotomies? Pro inhalational? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19:504–8. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000245275.76916.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schulte am Esch J, Thiemig I, Pfeifer G, Entzian W. The influence of some inhalation anaesthetics on the intracranial pressure with special reference to nitrous oxide. Anaesthesist. 1979;28:136–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schaffranietz L, Heinke W. The effect of different ventilation regimes on jugular venous oxygen saturation in elective neurosurgical patients. Neurol Res. 1998;20:S66–70. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1998.11740613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Haitsma IK, Maas AI. Monitoring cerebral oxygenation in traumatic brain injury. Prog Brain Res. 2007;161:207–16. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)61014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dagal A, Lam AM. Cerebral blood flow and the injured brain: how should we monitor and manipulate it? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Apr;24(2):131–7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283445898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kawaguchi M, Sakamoto T, Ohnishi H, Karasawa J, Furuya H. Preoperative predictors of reduction in arterial blood pressure following dural opening during surgical evacuation of acute subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1996;8(2):117–22. doi: 10.1097/00008506-199604000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sharma D, Brown MJ, Curry P, Noda S, Chesnut RM, Vavilala MS. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Hypotension During Craniotomy for Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e318254fb70. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Myburgh J, Cooper DJ, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Norton R, Bishop N, et al. SAFE Study Investigators; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group; Australian Red Cross Blood Service; George Institute for International Health Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:874–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cooper DJ, Myles PS, McDermott FT, Murray LJ, Laidlaw J, Cooper G, et al. Prehospital hypertonic saline resuscitation of patients with hypotension and severe traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1350–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.11.1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ract C, Vigué B. Comparison of the cerebral effects of dopamine and norepinephrine in severely head-injured patients. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:101–6. doi: 10.1007/s001340000754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Steiner LA, Johnston AJ, Czosnyka M, Chatfield DA, Salvador R, Coles JP, et al. Direct comparison of cerebrovascular effects of norepinephrine and dopamine in head-injured patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1049–54. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000120054.32845.a6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Johnston AJ, Steiner LA, Chatfield DA, Coles JP, Hutchinson PJ, Al-Rawi PG, et al. Effect of cerebral perfusion pressure augmentation with dopamine and norepinephrine on global and focal brain oxygenation after traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:791–7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2155-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sookplung P, Siriussawakul A, Malakouti A, Sharma D, Wang J, Souter MJ, et al. Vasopressor Use and Effect on Blood Pressure After Severe Adult Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocrit Care. 2010 doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9448-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Alvarez M, Nava JM, Rué M, Quintana S. Mortality prediction in head trauma patients: Performance of Glasgow Coma Score and general severity systems. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:142–8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Carlson AP, Schermer CR, Lu SW. Retrospective evaluation of anemia and transfusion in traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2006;61:567–71. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000231768.44727.a2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Salim A, Hadjizacharia P, DuBose J, Brown C, Inaba K, Chan L, et al. Role of anemia in traumatic brain injury. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:398–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hare GM, Tsui AK, McLaren AT, Ragoonanan TE, Yu J, Mazer CD. Anemia and cerebral outcomes: Many questions, fewer answers. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1356–70. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318184cfe9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ogawa Y, Iwasaki K, Aoki K, Shibata S, Kato J, Ogawa S. Central hypervolemia with hemodilution impairs dynamic cerebral autoregulation. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1389–96. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281910.95740.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Leal-Noval SR, Rincón-Ferrari MD, Marin-Niebla A, Cayuela A, Arellano-Orden V, Marín-Caballos A, et al. Transfusion of erythrocyte concentrates produces a variable increment on cerebral oxygenation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1733–40. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0376-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zygun DA, Nortje J, Hutchinson PJ, Timofeev I, Menon DK, Gupta AK. The effect of red blood cell transfusion on cerebral oxygenation and metabolism after severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1074–8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318194ad22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pendem S, Rana S, Manno EM, Gajic O. A review of red cell transfusion in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurocrit Care. 2006;4:63–7. doi: 10.1385/NCC:4:1:063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Harhangi BS, Kompanje EJ, Leebeek FW, Maas AI. Coagulation disorders after traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008;150:165–75. doi: 10.1007/s00701-007-1475-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Talving P, Benfield R, Hadjizacharia P, Inaba K, Chan LS, Demetriades D. Coagulopathy in severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective study. J Trauma. 2009;66:55–61. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318190c3c0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Perel P, Roberts I, Shakur H, Thinkhamrop B, Phuenpathom N, Yutthakasemsunt S. Haemostatic drugs for traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD007877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007877.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.CRASH-2 trial collaborators. Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, Caballero J, Coats T, Dewan Y, et al. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): A randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:23–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60835-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Oddo M, Levine JM, Frangos S, Carrera E, Maloney-Wilensky E, Pascual JL, et al. Effect of mannitol and hypertonic saline on cerebral oxygenation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:916–20. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.156596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Liu-DeRyke X, Collingridge DS, Orme J, Roller D, Zurasky J, Rhoney DH. Clinical impact of early hyperglycemia during acute phase of traumatic brain injury. Neurocrti Care. 2009;11:151–7. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9228-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jeremitsky E, Omert LA, Dunham CM, Wilberger J, Rodriguez A. The impact of hyperglycemia on patients with severe brain injury. J Trauma. 2005;58:47–50. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000135158.42242.b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sharma D, Jelacic J, Chennuri R, Chaiwat O, Chandler W, Vavilala MS. Incidence and risk factors for perioperative hyperglycemia in children with traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:81–9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818a6f32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Young B, Ott L, Dempsey R, Haack D, Tibbs P. Relationship between admission hyperglycemia and neurologic outcome of severely brain-injured patients. Ann Surg. 1989;210:466–72. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198910000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lipshutz AK, Gropper MA. Perioperative glycemic control: An evidence-based review. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:408–21. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181948a80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Rovlias A, Kotsou S. The influence of hyperglycemia on neurological outcome in patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:335–42. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200002000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bilotta F, Caramia R, Cernak I, Paoloni FP, Doronzio A, Cuzzone V, et al. Intensive insulin therapy after severe traumatic brain injury: A randomized clinical trial. Neurocrit Care. 2008;9:159–66. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9084-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, Blair D, Foster D, Dhingra V, et al. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;306:1283–97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Billotta F, Caramia R, Cernak I, Paoloni FP, Doronzio A, Cuzzone V, et al. Intensive insulin therapy after severe traumatic brain injury: A randomized clinical trial. Neurocrit Care. 2008;9:159–66. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9084-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Peterson K, Carson S, Carney N. Hypothermia treatment for traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:62–71. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Edwards P, Arango M, Balica L, Cottingham R, El-Sayed H, Farrell B, et al. CRASH trial collaborators Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury-outcomes at 6 months. Lancet. 2005;365:1957–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66552-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]