Abstract
Salmonellosis is a major contributor to the global public health burden. Salmonella enterica serotype Newport has ranked among three Salmonella serotypes most commonly associated with food-borne outbreaks in the United States. It was thought to be polyphyletic and composed of independent lineages. Here we report draft genomes of eight strains of S. Newport from diverse hosts and locations.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Nontyphoid Salmonella serotypes cause approximately 1.4 million illness cases (5) and several billion dollars in economic losses (7) annually in the United States. Salmonella enterica serotype Newport ranks among the top three Salmonella serotypes associated with food-borne outbreaks in the United States (1). The number of S. Newport outbreaks has increased markedly since 1995, causing at least 100,000 infections annually (1). Sangal et al. (6) indicated that S. Newport was polyphyletic and consisted of three independent lineages. Horizontal gene transfer has played a critical role in its evolution (6). Whole-genome sequencing has been increasingly used as a tool for both evolutionary studies and epidemiological investigations (2, 4). We selected eight S. Newport strains from a diverse range of hosts and locations for whole-genome sequencing analysis.
Currently, there are 31 complete genomes and 96 draft genomes of Salmonella that have been deposited in GenBank. However, there are only two genomes of S. Newport available, namely, S. Newport strain SL254 and S. Newport strain SL317. In this report, we announce the availability of eight draft genomes for the following S. Newport strains: CVM35185 (bison, TN), CVM33953 (ground turkey, MD), CVM21550 (swine, TX), CVM21538 (chicken, GA), CVM37978 (spinach, CO), CVM19593 (cheese, Mexico), CVM19443 (shrimp, India), and CVM19470 (squid, Vietnam). The whole-genome sequence data enable us to better understand the evolutionary history and pathogenicity of these important pathogens.
The eight S. Newport strains were sequenced using 454 Titanium pyrosequencing (Roche, Branford, CT) to obtain high-quality draft genomes (18 to 23× coverage). Genomic DNA from each strain was isolated from overnight culture with a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Genomic contigs were assembled (de novo) with 454 Life Sciences Newbler software package version 2.3 (Roche). The data for each draft genome are as follows: CVM35185 (95 contigs, 4,708,608 bp and 175,262 bp N50 contig size), CVM33953 (88 contigs, 4,801,131 bp and 223,836 bp N50 contig size), CVM21550 (73 contigs, 4,919,392 bp and 302,731 bp N50 contig size), CVM21538 (70 contigs, 4,927,7477 bp and 317,487 bp N50 contig size), CVM37978 (49 contigs, 4,796,975 bp and 264,843 bp N50 contig size), CVM19593 (74 contigs, 4,654,030 bp and 149,724 bp N50 contig size), CVM19443 (70 contigs, 4,807,399 bp and 209,050 bp N50 contig size), and CVM19470 (84 contigs, 4,730,328 bp and 158,282 bp N50 contig size). Sequences were annotated with the NCBI prokaryotic genomes automatic annotation pipeline (3). A total of 4,485 (CVM35185), 4,603 (CVM33953), 4,756 (CVM21550), 4,737 (CVM21538), 4,597 (CVM37978), 4,451 (CVM19593), 4,645 (CVM19443), and 4,559 (CVM19470) genes were determined.
A detailed report of the phylogenetic analysis of the eight draft genomes will be included in a future publication.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The draft genome sequences of these eight S. Newport strains are available in GenBank under the accession no. AHTJ00000000, AHTM00000000, AHTT00000000, AHTV00000000, AHUC00000000, AHUD00000000, AHUB00000000, and AHUE00000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The study was supported in part by funding from the Joint Institute for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (JIFSAN), University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
REFERENCES
- 1. CDC. 2006. Salmonella surveillance: annual summary. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, Atlanta, GA [Google Scholar]
- 2. Harris SR, et al. 2010. Evolution of MRSA during hospital transmission and intercontinental spread. Science 327:469–474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Klimke W, et al. 2009. The National Center for Biotechnology Information's protein clusters database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D216–D223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lienau EK, et al. 2011. Identification of a salmonellosis outbreak by means of molecular sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med. 364:981–982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mead PS, et al. 1999. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:607–625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sangal V, et al. 2010. Evolution and population structure of Salmonella enterica serovar Newport. J. Bacteriol. 192:6465–6476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Voetsch AC, et al. 2004. FoodNet estimate of the burden of illness caused by nontyphoidal Salmonella infections in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38 (Suppl 3): S127–S134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]