Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Jun 22;127(24):8600–8601. doi: 10.1021/ja051462l

Chemoselective Covalent Coupling of Oligonucleotide Probes to Self-Assembled Monolayers

Neal K Devaraj 1, Gregory P Miller 1, Wataru Ebina 1, Boyko Kakaradov 1, James P Collman 1,*, Eric T Kool 1,*, Christopher E D Chidsey 1,*
PMCID: PMC3431914  NIHMSID: NIHMS398859  PMID: 15954758

Surface arrays of single-stranded DNA are at the center of some of the most active areas in biological research. These include conventional applications in genome sequencing and disease diagnostics, as well as more novel emerging examples, such as combinatorial drug and reaction discovery.1 Most methods of oligonucleotide immobilization rely on traditional nucleophilic–electrophilic reactions to achieve coupling of the oligonucleotide to the surface.2 Unfortunately, this strategy is susceptible to side reactions, for instance, with amino groups on the nucleotides or the small molecule contaminants inherent to oligonucleotide synthesis.3 Additionally, popular reactive electrophiles, such as N-hydroxysuccinimide esters, are prone to hydrolysis before and during the coupling reaction, which both reduce coupling yields and can make the yields irreproducible.4 Accurate and reproducible detection of target oligonucleotides depends on the accuracy and reproducibility with which the surface can be functionalized. In this paper, we report a chemoselective approach to the formation of oligonucleotide probe surfaces using copper(I) tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine (TBTA)-catalyzed triazole formation between a controlled density of azide groups on densely packed self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) and acetylene groups on the oligonucleotide probe to be immobilized. We have found this strategy to be highly predictable, very fast, and resistant to side reactions, unaffected even by the presence of excess nucleophilic or electrophilic impurities.

Recently, we have demonstrated that Sharpless “click” chemistry can be used to covalently attach acetylene-bearing molecules to azide-terminated SAMs.5,6 The surface reaction is quantitative and regioselective, exclusively yielding a single product at a single orientation. The chemistry is orthogonal to most typical organic transformations and thus is chemoselective.7 Recent studies have demonstrated that the chemistry is well suited for the coupling of biomolecules to surfaces.8 Although application of this chemistry to the attachment of oligonucleotides may appear straightforward, the majority of past work used free Cu(I), typically generated and maintained in aqueous solution by an excess of reducing agent. Unfortunately, in the presence of dioxygen, Cu(I) rapidly damages DNA via the generation of reactive oxygen species.9 In order for a surface array of oligonucleotides to be useful as a sensor, the structure of the oligonucleotides must be preserved. Recently, the Sharpless group has introduced a triazolylamine copper ligand, tris-(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine, that can accelerate the cycloaddition reaction.10 At the same time, this ligand was found to significantly deter the redox chemistry of Cu(I) with oxygen, which is essential for preventing damage to the oligonucleotides. Encouraged by the highly desirable features of the Cu(I)TBTA-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition, we studied its applicability to the attachment of oligonucleotide probes onto well-defined SAMs.

Oligodeoxyribonucleotides (13mers) bearing reactive acetylene linkers on the 5′-end were synthesized by adapting a previously reported procedure.11 Briefly, 5′-iodo oligonucleotides were generated on the DNA synthesis column by application of (PhO)3PCH3I to the 5′-deprotected oligomers. Reaction of the resulting support-bound iodo oligonucleotide with sodium 4-pentyne 1-thiolate yielded the desired product in 5 min. The modified oligonucleotides were cleaved and deprotected using standard ammoniacal conditions and were used without purification.

Azide-terminated SAMs on gold were formed as previously described by soaking silicon wafers, freshly coated with evaporated gold, in SAM deposition solutions of 1-azidoundecane-11-thiol in ethanol either without any other “diluent” thiol to form pure azide-terminated thiol SAMs or with octane thiol or 6-mercaptohexanol to form mixed azide/methyl-terminated or azide/hydroxyl-terminated thiol SAMs (Table 1).6 The azide-terminated thiol SAMs were exposed to a coupling solution of the 13mer (50 μM) and Cu(I) (400 μM) complexed by TBTA in aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide for 30 min at room temperature, after which the surfaces were rinsed thoroughly with both aqueous and organic solvents. This procedure is both simple and fast in comparison to many previously reported modifications that covalently attach oligonucleotides to surfaces. This method requires a single covalent coupling step (does not require a bifunctional linker), does not make use of buffers or humidification chambers, and occurs in just minutes as opposed to hours.12

Table 1.

Oligonucleotide Coverages for Various Thiol SAM Deposition and Oligonucleotide Coupling Conditions

thiol solution coupling solution coverage (oligos/cm2) hybridization efficiency
5 mM N3(CH2)11SH standard 1.1 ± 0.1 × 1013 24 ± 11%
5 mM N3(CH2)11SH no acetylene on oligo 2.3 ± 0.8 × 1010 N/A
5 mM N3(CH2)11SH standard + 13 × 2-methoxy propylamine 1.1 ± 0.2 × 1013 N/A
5 mM N3(CH2)11SH standard + 13 × acrylonitrile 1.1 ± 0.1 × 1013 N/A
<0.05 mM N3(CH2)11SHa
4.95 mM CH3(CH2)7SH
standard 3.6 ± 0.2 × 1012 97 ± 7%
0.05 mM N3(CH2)11SH
4.95 mM HO(CH2)6SH
standard 1.1 ± 0.1 × 1012 96 ± 13%
a

Azide thiol had partially oxidized to the azide disulfide, which is known to adsorb less avidly than the azide thiol.

The oligonucleotide coverage was measured with an assay developed by Tarlov and coworkers.13 Oligonucleotide surfaces are exposed to dilute solutions of a redox probe (Ru(NH3)6+3), which electrostatically binds to the phosphate backbone and is electrochemically quantified by a chronocoulometric method that distinguishes bound from soluble Ru(NH3)6+3. On the basis of this assay, we found that pure azide-terminated thiol SAMs were routinely functionalized with 1.1 × 1013 oligonucleotides/cm2. To rule out nonspecific adsorption, control reactions were run using a 13mer of the same sequence without the appended acetylene. After identical rinsing, roughly 500 times less oligonucleotide could be detected electrochemically. To demonstrate the tolerance of our procedure to impurities, reactant solutions were prepared containing a 13-fold molar excess of either the nucleophile 2-methoxy propylamine or the electrophile acrylonitrile. Neither impurity affected the amount of oligonucleotide attached to the surface during the coupling reaction.

Attempts to hybridize the 13mers on the pure azide-terminated thiol SAMs to the complementary 13mer target resulted in incomplete and variable levels of hybridization. This is not surprising given the high surface density of the 13mers on the pure azide-terminated thiol SAMs. Prior studies have demonstrated that hybridization efficiencies drop as the surface density of oligonucleotides increases due to increasing steric crowding and electrostatic repulsion.13,14 Fortunately, oligonucleotide probe density can be easily controlled by use of mixed azide/methyl-terminated or azide/hydroxyl-terminated SAMs. Oligonucleotide probe density was reduced by coupling to SAMs formed by immersing gold substrates in deposition solutions containing 1 mol % azidoundecanethiol and 99 mol % of either octanethiol or mercaptohexanol. These surfaces were able to hybridize greater than 90% of all probes to the complementary targets (Table 1).

In summary, we have developed a rapid and straightforward procedure for creating structurally well-defined surface arrays of oligonucleotides. Acetylene-bearing oligonucleotides were reacted with azide-functionalized self-assembled monolayers on gold, and the chemistry was shown to be extremely selective and is, thus, immune to typical yield-reducing side reactions, such as hydrolysis or deactivation by electrophiles or nucleophiles. Specific oligonucleotide coverages can be reproducibly achieved simply by controlling the amount of reactive azide in mixed monolayers. In principle, this technique can be extended to other surfaces on which self-assembled monolayers readily form. For instance, in preliminary work, we have used azidotrimethoxyundecylsilane monolayers on silicate glass surfaces to immobilize the oligonucleotides used here (see Supporting Information).15 We are working to develop mixed monolayers in this system, so that the density of oligos can be controlled in the same way as that we have shown above for gold substrates. We believe this strategy will be useful in the formation of diagnostic microarrays, where the predictable, reproducible, and fast formation of oligonucleotide probe surfaces is highly desirable.

Supplementary Material

supporting information

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Surface modification of a mixed SAM on gold by chemoselective coupling of acetylene-bearing oligonucleotides.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge insightful discussions with Rebecca Weisinger, Dave Robinson, Adam Silverman, and Marina Kaplun. Tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)-amine was received as a gift from Timothy Chan (Sharpless group, Scripps Research Institute). This material is based upon work supported by the NSF under Grant CHE0131206, the NIH under Grants GM068122 and GM067201, a grant from the Army Research Office, and a Stanford Graduate Fellowship.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental procedures, chronocoulometric response curves, and fluorescent images of oligonucleotide arrays on silica substrate. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.(a) Tillib SV, Mirzabekov A. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001;12:53–58. doi: 10.1016/s0958-1669(00)00168-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kanan MW, Rozenman MM, Sakurai K, Snyder TM, Liu DR. Nature. 2004;7008:545–549. doi: 10.1038/nature02920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Halpin DR, Harbury PB. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:1022–1030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Some of the many recent examples: Boncheva M, Scheibler L, Lincoln P, Vogel H, Akerman B. Langmuir. 1999;15:4317–4320.Johnson PA, Levicky R. Langmuir. 2003;19:10288–10294.Peelen D, Smith LM. Langmuir. 2005:266–271. doi: 10.1021/la048166r.Jin L, Horgan A, Levicky R. Langmuir. 2003;19:6968–6975.
  • 3.Ausubel FM. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Unit 2.11 Wiley; New York: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gong P, Grainger DW. Surf Sci. 2004;570:67–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB. Angew Chem. 2002;114:2708–2711. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020715)41:14<2596::AID-ANIE2596>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:2596–2599. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020715)41:14<2596::AID-ANIE2596>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Collman JP, Devaraj NK, Chidsey CED. Langmuir. 2004;20:1051–1053. doi: 10.1021/la0362977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Breinbauer R, Koehn M. ChemBioChem. 2003;4:1246–1248. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200300705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Meng JC, Siuzdak G, Finn MG. Chem Commun. 2004;18:2108–2109. doi: 10.1039/b408200a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Seo TS, Bai XP, Ruparel H, Li ZM, Turro NJ, Ju JY. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:5488–5493. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401138101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bryan MC, Fazio F, Lee HK, Huang CY, Chang A, Best MD, Calarese DA, Blixt O, Paulson JC, Burton D, Wilson IA, Wong CH. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:8640–8641. doi: 10.1021/ja048433f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Seo TS, Li ZM, Ruparel H, Ju JY. J Org Chem. 2003;68:609–612. doi: 10.1021/jo026615r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Chiou SHJ. Biochem. 1983;94:1259–1267. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a134471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kazakov SA, Astashkina TG, Mamaev SV, Vlassov VV. Nature. 1988;335:186–188. doi: 10.1038/335186a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Oikawa S, Kawanishi S. Biochemistry. 1996;35:4584–4590. doi: 10.1021/bi9527000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Ueda J, Takai M, Shimazu Y, Ozawa T. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;357:231–239. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1998.0811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) John DCA, Douglas KT. Transition Met Chem. 1996;21:460–463. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chan TR, Hilgraf R, Sharpless KB, Fokin VV. Org Lett. 2004;6:2853–2855. doi: 10.1021/ol0493094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Miller GP, Kool ET. J Org Chem. 2004;69:2404–2410. doi: 10.1021/jo035765e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Miller GP, Kool ET. Org Lett. 2002;4:3599–3601. doi: 10.1021/ol0264915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.(a) Boncheva M, Scheibler L, Lincoln P, Vogel H, Akerman B. Langmuir. 1999;15:4317–4320. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fuentes M, Mateo C, Garcia L, Tercero JC, Guisan JM, Fernandez-Lafuente R. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:883–888. doi: 10.1021/bm0343949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Dombi KL, Griesang N, Richert C. Synthesis. 2002;6:816–824. [Google Scholar]; (d) Peelen D, Smith LM. Langmuir. 2005;21:266–271. doi: 10.1021/la048166r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Steel AB, Herne TM, Tarlov MJ. Anal Chem. 1998;70:4670–4677. doi: 10.1021/ac980037q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Watterson JH, Piunno PAE, Wust CC, Krull UJ. Langmuir. 2000;16:4984–4992. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lummerstorfer T, Hoffmann H. Langmuir. 2004;20:3963–3966. doi: 10.1021/la0492916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supporting information

RESOURCES