Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transfusion. 2012 Jan;52(1):207–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03424.x

Another case of acute cardiopulmonary toxicity with cord blood infusion: Is dextran the culprit?

Sung Choi 1, Sandra Hoffmann 2, Laura Cooling 2
PMCID: PMC3433065  NIHMSID: NIHMS330329  PMID: 22221224

Infusion-related adverse reactions associated with cord blood (CB) transplants are considered to be less frequent and less severe when compared to cryopreserved bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells.1 The true incidence of these reactions is unknown, although it is reported that 30-60% of CB recipients are affected by infusion reactions.1,2 Recently, there have been six published reports of severe, life-threatening cardiopulmonary reactions associated with CB infusions (Table 1).3,4 A review by the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of 13 serious CB-associated infusion reactions events showed that the majority of cases (92%; 12/13) involved infusion of at least one RBC-replete CB unit.3 As a consequence, the NMDP and FDA provided recommendations for thawing and washing RBC-replete CB units.3 We report a case of a seventh, cardiopulmonary reaction associated with the infusion of a RBC-depleted, CB unit diluted with human serum albumin (HSA)-Dextran 40.2

Table 1.

Summary of Cord Blood Infusion Reactions with Cardiopulmonary Symptoms*

Patient
Cord Blood Characteristics
Infusion Reaction
Case Age Sex CB
Unit
ABO
Compatible
RBC
Depleted
CB Processing Final
Volume
Onset Symptoms Ref
1 16 F 1 N Y Both diluted 1:3
HSA-Dextran 40
169 mL < 5 min Nausea, vomiting, hypertension, chest
pressure, tachycardia, ↑QTc, ↑troponin,
septal hypokinesis, ↓ left ventricular
function.
This
Report
2 Y Y 201mL 2 hours Hives.
2 55 M 1+2 Y Y None 209 mL 10 min Chest pain, hypertension, nausea, hypoxia,
pulmonary edema, ↑troponin, ARI.
3
3 44 F 1 Y N Both diluted
HSA-Dextran 40
251 mL
52 mL
50 min Chest pain, ↑troponin, hypoxia, ↓EF
(69→15%), pulmonary infiltrates, ARI.
4
2 Y NA
4 65 M 1 Y NA Both diluted
HSA-Dextran 40
200 mL First unit Chest pain, ↑troponin, ↓EF (25%), ST
changes, hypoxia, pulmonary edema, ARI.
4
2 Y NA 50 mL
5 34 F 1 N N Both diluted 1:4
HSA-Dextran 40
Total
500 mL
50 mL Chest pain, ↓EF (66→50%). 4
2 Y N During
infusion
Hypoxia, nausea, vomiting, chest pain,
↑troponin, ↓EF (50→40%), pulmonary
infiltrates, global myocardial hypokinesis.
6 20 F 1 NA N None 50 mL During
infusion
Chest pain, hypertension, hypoxia, nausea,
vomiting, hemoglobinuria.
4
2 NA Y Diluted
HSA-Dextran 40
NA
3 NA N Diluted
HSA-Dextran 40
114 mL
7 60 NA 1 NA N Centrifuged,
resuspended HSA
175 mL 15 min Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain,
hypertension, hypoxia, ST depression,
↑troponin, mild atrial hypokinesia.
3
*

Abbreviations: CB, cord blood; EF, cardiac ejection fraction; HSA, human serum albumin; NA, not available; ARI, acute renal injury.

The patient was a 16-year old, 46 kg, group O Caucasian female with acute biphenotypic leukemia. As part of a clinical trial, the patient was randomized to receive a 5/6 HLA-matched, double CB transplant (Table 1). Both CB units were RBC-depleted and cryopreserved in a solution containing 10% DMSO and 10% Dextran-40. After thawing, both CB units were diluted 1:3 with 5% HSA-8% Dextran 40 solution, for a combined final infusion volume of 411 ml and less than 3% DMSO per unit. The total transplant dose was 2.6 × 105 CD34 per kg and 5.7 × 107 TNC per kg of recipient weight.

The patient was pre-medicated with acetaminophen, diphenhydramine, hydrocortisone, and mannitol per institutional clinical practice guidelines. Less than five minutes after starting the first CB unit, the patient experienced a severe anaphylactic reaction characterized by nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, wheezing, chest tightness, tachycardia, and tachypnea. The infusion was immediately stopped and the patient was treated with hydrocortisone, diphenhydramine, ativan, atrovent, and albuterol, and placed on 4 liters of oxygen by nasal cannula. After 10 minutes, the patient’s symptoms improved and the infusion of CB unit #1 was slowly restarted and subsequently completed within 60 minutes. After additional premedication, the patient received the second CB unit over 60 minutes. The second infusion was uneventful except for hypertension and a few hives two hours post-infusion. Both were successfully treated with additional antihistamine and anti-hypertensive medications.

Diagnostic studies at the time of the infusion reaction showed a prolonged QTc (baseline 0.416 to 0.514 sec), elevated troponin (baseline <0.01 to 1.7 ng/mL) and B-type natriuretic peptide (baseline 110 to 592 pg/mL). An echocardiogram revealed regional hypokinesis of the basal half of the posterior two-thirds of the septum, with overall mildly depressed left ventricular systolic function. The patient had no evidence of electrolyte abnormalities, renal insufficiency, intravascular hemolysis or acute pulmonary changes. Pertinent EKG and laboratory studies returned to baseline within 48 hours and were attributed to transient myocardial ischemia.

Our patient’s symptoms were consistent with a severe, anaphylactic reaction. We believe the reaction was precipitated by Dextran 40. Acute, severe reactions to Dextran 40 have a reported incidence of 1/2000 and can be associated with cardiac ischemia, pulmonary and renal injury.4,5 It is noteworthy that the majority (6/7) of cardiopulmonary infusion reactions reported to date were associated with CB units frozen and/or diluted in HSA-Dextran. As observed by Ma et al,4 reports of severe CB infusion reactions “coincide with the introduction of dextran in cryopreservation”, and include more recent protocols for dilution or washing CB products in HSA-Dextran.2 Ongoing investigations into severe CB reactions should include the potential role of Dextran in such reactions, as well as possible prophylaxis with Dextran-1, a hapten known to significantly decrease the risk of Dextran reactions.4,5

Acknowledgements

Funding Source: S.C. is supported by St. Baldrick’s Foundation and the National Institutes of Health K23 Grant AI091623-01

Biography

Sung Choi MD Department of Pediatrics, Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI

Sandra Hoffman MT(ASCP), SBB Laura Cooling MD, MS Department of Pathology University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest The authors certify that they have no affiliation with or financial involvement in any organization or entity with a direct financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Chrysler GR, McKenna DH, Scheierman T, Kadidlo D, Askari S, Miller J, Clay ME, McCullough J. Umbilical cord blood banking. In: Broxmeyer HE, editor. Cord Blood: Biology, Immunology, Banking and Clinical Transplantation. AABB Press; Bethesda MD: 2004. pp. 219–257. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barker JN, Abboud M, Rice RD, Hawke R, Schaible A, Heller G, La Russa V, Scaradavou A. A “no-wash” albumin-dextran dilution strategy for cord blood unit thaw: high rate of engraftment and a low incidence of serious infusion reactions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:1596–602. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Miller JP. National Marrow Donor Program. Minneapolis, MN: Jul, 2009. A centralized cord blood registry to facilitate allogenic, unrelated cord blood transplantation, BB-IND #7555 Safety Report. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ma RW, Kwan JM, Ma DD, Fay KC. Acute life-threatening cardiovascular toxicity with umbilical cord blood infusion: the role of dextran. Am J Hematol. 2010;85:722–4. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zinderman CE, Landow L, Wise RP. Anaphylactoid reactions to Dextran 40 and 70: Reports to the United States Food and Drug Administration, 1969 to 2004. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:1004–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES