Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications
. 2012 Aug 31;68(Pt 9):1106–1108. doi: 10.1107/S174430911203271X

Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic studies of FoxE from Rhodobacter ferrooxidans SW2, an FeII oxidoreductase involved in photoferrotrophy

L Pereira a, I H Saraiva a, R Coelho a, D K Newman b, R O Louro a, C Frazão a,*
PMCID: PMC3433209  PMID: 22949206

Crystals of the R. ferrooxidans SW2 iron oxidoreductase FoxE were obtained and the phase problem was solved by Fe SAD at 2.44 Å resolution.

Keywords: FoxE, iron oxidoreductases, Rhodobacter ferrooxidans SW2, photoferrotrophy

Abstract

FoxE is a protein encoded by the foxEYZ operon of Rhodobacter ferrooxidans SW2 that is involved in FeII-based anoxygenic photosynthesis (‘photoferrotrophy’). It is thought to reside in the periplasm, where it stimulates light-dependent FeII oxidation. It contains 259 residues, including two haem c-binding motifs. As no three-dimensional model is available and there is no structure with a similar sequence, crystals of FoxE were produced. They diffracted to 2.44 Å resolution using synchrotron radiation at the Fe edge. The phase problem was solved by SAD using SHELXC/D/E and the experimental maps confirmed the presence of two haems per molecule.

1. Introduction  

FoxE is a di-haem c-type cytochrome encoded by the foxEYZ operon from the bacterium Rhodobacter ferrooxidans SW2, a bacterium that is capable of photoferrotrophy. This is a metabolic strategy that is characterized by the utilization of ferrous iron (FeII) oxidation as the sole source of electrons for photosynthesis (Widdel et al., 1993). The ferric iron (FeIII) resulting from this metabolism precipitates as ferric (hydr)oxides at the neutral pH at which this organism grows. This ancient form of photosynthesis (Xiong et al., 2000) is hypothesized to have catalyzed the deposition of ancient sedimentary deposits known as banded iron formations in early phases of the history of the Earth (Kappler et al., 2005).

Heterologous expression of the fox operon in the bacterium R. capsulatus SB1003 resulted in enhanced photosynthetic FeII-oxidation activity, which suggested that the products of this operon are required for photoferrotrophy (Croal et al., 2007). That the expression of foxE alone is enough to enhance photosynthetic FeII oxidation indicates that this cytochrome is responsible for the FeII-oxidation step in this metabolism. Previous functional characterization of FoxE (Saraiva et al., 2012) demonstrated that it is thermodynamically and kinetically capable of oxidizing FeII in vitro.

In-depth characterization of the proteins involved in photoferro­trophy is required in order to understand this ancient form of photosynthesis which is likely to have had a profound impact on the geochemical evolution of the Earth in the past.

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Protein expression and purification  

FoxE was cloned, expressed and purified as described by Saraiva et al. (2012). The protein purity was checked by SDS–PAGE and the pure protein was concentrated using Vivaspin concentrators with a 30 kDa cutoff membrane, leading to a final protein solution consisting of 15–18 mg ml−1 FoxE in 5 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0.

2.2. Protein crystallization  

Initial FoxE crystallization screens were performed at room temperature (293 K) by the vapour-diffusion method with commercially available solution kits in a Mini-Bee MicroSys 4000XL Cartesian Dispensing Systems robot (Genomic Solutions, USA). Drops were produced by dispensing 100 nl protein solution plus 100 nl precipitant solution and were equilibrated against 100 µl precipitant solution; they were examined under a magnifying glass to detect possible crystallization hints. These were then further optimized in microlitre-scale drops by variation of the initial conditions, by the use of crystallization additives and by attempting seeding experiments.

Two crystallization screens, Structure Screen 1 and Structure Screen 2 from Molecular Dimensions Ltd (Suffolk, England), were initially tried. No crystallization hits were detected among those 2 × 48 trials, but precipitation was observed in ∼50% of the drops with solutions containing PEG and in ∼60% of the drops with pH below 6.5. MacroSol, JCSG-plus and Stura Footprints screens from Molecular Dimensions were then tried. Three distinct crystal shapes were obtained from these 192 conditions: needle-like crystals were obtained using solution 2.16 of MacroSol [0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5, 2.0 M ammonium sulfate, 5%(v/v) PEG 400], polyhedral crystals with similar shapes were obtained using four solutions from JCSG-plus that contained PEG, namely solution 1.2 [0.1 M sodium citrate pH 5.5, 20%(w/v) PEG 3K], solution 1.45 [0.17 M ammonium sulfate, 25.5%(w/v) PEG 4K, 15% glycerol], solution 1.21 [0.1 M citrate pH 5, 20%(w/v) PEG 6K] and solution 2.45 [0.2 M lithium sulfate, 0.1 M bis-Tris pH 5.5, 25%(w/v) PEG 3350], and agglomerated polycrystals were obtained using Stura Footprints solution B6 (1.32 M sodium/potassium phosphate pH 7). The conditions that delivered the best-looking crystals were optimized on the microlitre scale, aiming to control nucleation and to increase the crystal size. However, the use of JCSG-plus solution 1.2 could not be reproduced and solution 1.45 only produced crystals at 303 K. The use of PEGs of sizes 2–6K at 5–­20%, the addition of 5 or 15% glycerol, the removal of sodium citrate, the use of drops with different volumes of protein and precipitant (2:1.5, 2:1, 2.2:0.8 and 2.3:0.7), the addition of silicone, paraffin or PEG 400 to control vapour diffusion and the use of macro-seeding were attempted. These attempts revealed that the crystals were often not reproducible and showed a gel-like consistency within 4–7 d, therefore not being amenable to X-ray diffraction.

We proceeded with the non-PEG lead, Stura Footprints solution B6 based on phosphate precipitant. Although its microlitre scale-up was reproducible at all temperatures tested (277, 293 and 303 K), diffraction experiments showed that the crystals were disordered. Crystallization conditions at 293 K were then varied using PEGs of sizes 2–6K, 10–36%(v/v) PEG concentration, 0.1–1.4 M phosphate concentration, pH values in the range 5–7.2 and different (1:2, 1:1 and 2:1) dispensing ratios. Better crystals grew in 0.2 M sodium/potassium phosphate pH 5, 20%(v/v) PEG 5K, but degraded over time and did not produce usable diffraction. In order to sample wider crystallization conditions using phosphate precipitant, the Additive Screen from Hampton Research (Aliso Viejo, USA) was also used, restricted to its 80 nonvolatile conditions. The best crystals were obtained at 293 K in sitting drops consisting of 1 µl 15 mg ml−1 protein solution plus 1 µl precipitant solution (1.2 M sodium/potassium phosphate pH 7, 50 mM copper chloride) equilibrated against 500 µl precipitant solution in the well. Red polyhedral crystals reached dimensions of up to approximately 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.02 mm (Fig. 1). Crystal cryo­protection was accomplished by soaking the crystals in mother liquor complemented with 25%(v/v) glycerol.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crystallization drop of FoxE showing red well shaped polyhedral crystals with approximate dimensions of 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.02 mm.

2.3. X-ray diffraction data collection and crystal phase-problem solution  

The diffraction of a cryostabilized crystal was measured near the iron absorption edge using an ADSC Q315R detector at station ID23-1 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France. Diffraction images from two 360° crystal rotations, interleaved by a crystal translation in order to start each diffraction run from an unexposed crystal region, were integrated and scaled with XDS (Kabsch, 2010) and the resulting two sets of intensities were merged together with XPREP (Bruker).

The phase problem was solved by single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) using the HKL2MAP GUI (Pape & Schneider, 2004; Sheldrick, 2008), which (i) relies on SHELXC to analyse the data, estimate anomalous difference factors and produce initial phase shifts for reflections corresponding to the largest normalized anomalous differences, (ii) uses SHELXD to determined the anomalous heavy-atom substructure and (iii) uses SHELXE to produce iterative phase improvement by density modification, including automated poly-Ala chain tracing (Sheldrick, 2010).

3. Results and discussion  

Despite several attempts to optimize the initial FoxE crystallization conditions from PEG- or phosphate-containing solutions, the crystals were not always reproducible; their diffraction indicated disordered crystal packing and showed severe intensity reduction within a few days, when the crystals became gel-like red polyhedra. The addition of copper chloride as an additive to the mother liquor, however, led to increased crystal stability and to increased diffraction capability. FoxE crystallized in space group P3121 or P3221, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 112.77, c = 143.54 Å, and the crystals diffracted to 2.44 Å resolution (see Table 1 for further crystallographic details and diffraction data statistics).

Table 1. Crystallographic and diffraction data statistics.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

ESRF beamline ID23-1
Wavelength (Å) 1.73925
Resolution (Å) 57.83–2.44 (2.54–2.44)
Space group P3121
Unit-cell parameters (Å) a = b = 112.77, c = 143.54
No. of measured reflections 1293342
No. of unique reflections 38526 (3591)
Multiplicity 32.2 (6.3)
Mean I/σ(I) 28.3 (1.9)
R p.i.m. (%) 2.2 (25.0)
R merge (%) 13.6 (70.7)
Completeness (%) 96.1 (77.1)
Solvent content (%) 52.3
Wilson B factor (Å2) 49.1

R p.i.m. = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where N is the data multiplicity, Ii(hkl) is the observed intensity and 〈I(hkl)〉 is the average intensity of multiple observations from symmetry-related reflections. It is an indicator of the precision of the final merged and averaged data set (Weiss, 2001).

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where Ii(hkl) is the observed intensity and 〈I(hkl)〉 is the average intensity of multiple observations from symmetry-related reflections.

The diffraction data measured using X-rays at the Fe absorption edge contained significant anomalous signal up to 3.7 Å resolution, where the self-anomalous correlation coefficient remained above 30%. The probability distribution of the Matthews coefficient for 2.5 Å resolution indicated a 74% probability of four FoxE molecules in the asymmetric unit, in contrast to a 17% probability of an asymmetric unit containing only three molecules (Kantardjieff & Rupp, 2003). As the FoxE sequence contains two haem c cytochrome CXXCH motifs (Croal et al., 2007), SHELXD was set to search for eight Fe atoms. However, only six anomalous atoms were found with occupancies in the range 0.8–1.0; further hypothetical sites refined to occupancies below 0.2 and were discarded. Accordingly, the FoxE crystal contained three molecules in the asymmetric unit, corresponding to a calculated crystal solvent content of 52% (Matthews, 1968). SHELXE was run twice. The first run, using phase information from the six-Fe-atom substructure, solved the space-group hand ambiguity, produced initial experimental maps, traced a 641 poly-Ala residue model in 35 chains and listed a set of further anomalous sites. These were examined with Coot (Emsley et al., 2010) to determine the 12 thioether sites that attach the six haems to the three FoxE molecules. A second SHELXE run was thus performed including the phases from a further 12 S atoms and produced the final experimental maps (Fig. 2), in which 678 poly-Ala residues of the expected 777 were traced in a model with 18 chains and a correlation coefficient of 35%.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Experimental SAD electron density (blue mesh, 0.7σ) and anomalous density (red mesh, 5σ) of a representative region of FoxE showing a haem and its ligands. (a) and (b) show views with the haem plane perpendicular and parallel to the paper, respectively. The Fe-atom localization is recognisable in the anomalous map at the haem centre and the thioether S atoms are recognisable at the haem periphery. The maps were produced with SHELXE (Sheldrick, 2010) and the figures were produced with PyMOL (DeLano, 2002).

Three-dimensional structure determination and refinement of FoxE is in progress in order to unravel the molecular arrangement of this c-type cytochrome with unprecedented primary structure that is capable of oxidizing iron in vitro in a pH-dependent manner that appears to be designed to prevent incrustation of the cells by ferric iron.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the ESRF, Grenoble, France for provision of synchrotron radiation and thank Susana Gonçalves, ITQB–UNL, Portugal for diffraction data collection. G. M. Sheldrick is thanked for valuable discussions and for providing the SHELXE program. This work was funded by projects MIT-Pt/BS-BB/1014/2008 from the MIT-Portugal Program and PTDC/EBB-BIO/098352/2008 from FCT, Portugal. IHS is the recipient of a PhD grant from FCT (SFRH/BD/36582/2007). DKN is an HHMI Investigator.

References

  1. Croal, L. R., Jiao, Y. & Newman, D. K. (2007). J. Bacteriol. 189, 1774–1782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. DeLano, W. L. (2002). PyMOL http://www.pymol.org.
  3. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Kabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 125–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Kantardjieff, K. A. & Rupp, B. (2003). Protein Sci. 12, 1865–1871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Kappler, A., Pasquero, C., Konhauser, K. O. & Newman, D. K. (2005). Geology, 33, 865–868.
  7. Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Pape, T. & Schneider, T. R. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 843–844.
  9. Saraiva, I. H., Newman, D. K. & Louro, R. O. (2012). J. Biol. Chem. 287, 25541–25548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 479–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Weiss, M. S. (2001). J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 130–135.
  13. Widdel, F., Schnell, S., Heising, S., Ehrenreich, A., Assmus, B. & Schink, B. (1993). Nature (London), 362, 834–836.
  14. Xiong, J., Fischer, W. M., Inoue, K., Nakahara, M. & Bauer, C. E. (2000). Science, 289, 1724–1730. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES