Abstract
With growing concerns of the safety of nanotechnology, the in vivo toxicity of nanoparticles (NPs) at environmental relevant concentrations has drawn increasing attentions. We investigated the possible molecular mechanisms of titanium nanoparticles (Ti-NPs) in the induction of toxicity at predicted environmental relevant concentrations. In nematodes, small sizes (4 nm and 10 nm) of TiO2-NPs induced more severe toxicities than large sizes (60 nm and 90 nm) of TiO2-NPs on animals using lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior, intestinal autofluorescence, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production as endpoints. Locomotion behaviors could be significantly decreased by exposure to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at concentration of 1 ng/L in nematodes. Among genes required for the control of oxidative stress, only the expression patterns of sod-2 and sod-3 genes encoding Mn-SODs in animals exposed to small sizes of TiO2-NPs were significantly different from those in animals exposed to large sizes of TiO2-NPs. sod-2 and sod-3 gene expressions were closely correlated with lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior, intestinal autofluorescence, and ROS production in TiO2-NPs-exposed animals. Ectopically expression of human and nematode Mn-SODs genes effectively prevented the induction of ROS production and the development of toxicity of TiO2-NPs. Therefore, the altered expression patterns of Mn-SODs may explain the toxicity formation for different sizes of TiO2-NPs at predicted environmental relevant concentrations. In addition, we demonstrated here a strategy to investigate the toxicological effects of exposure to NPs upon humans by generating transgenic strains in nematodes for specific human genes.
Introduction
The potential toxicity of materials at the “nano” scale is receiving increasing attentions [1]–[2]. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) are often used as pigments or additives for paints, paper, ceramics, plastics, foods, and other products [3]–[4]. Hence, TiO2-NPs come into close contact with humans. The adverse effects caused by exposure to TiO2-NPs in vivo seem to have become more important than those due to exposure in vitro. Acute exposure to TiO2-NPs has been shown to cause hepatic injury, nephrotoxicity, pathological changes in the kidney, myocardial damage, spleen lesions, and inflammation in the lung and liver in mice or rats [5]–[10]. After intraperitoneal injection of TiO2-NPs, mice showed signs of toxicity, including passive behavior, loss of appetite, tremors and lethargy [7]. It was reported that mice exposed to TiO2-NPs during gestation produced offspring that could display moderate neurobehavioral alterations [10]. After subchronic dermal exposure of TiO2-NPs, TiO2-NPs penetrated through the skin to reach different tissues and induced the formation of diverse pathological lesions in several major organs [11]. In mice, exposure to TiO2-NPs also induced fetal resorption, restricted the growth of fetuses, and altered the expression of genes related to development and function of the central nervous system in pregnant animals, indicating the potential fetotoxicity of TiO2-NPs [12]–[13]. Acute toxicity assay of TiO2-NPs using Daphnia magna demonstrated that mortality increased after exposure [14]. Long-term exposure to TiO2-NPs has been shown to disturb progression of the cell cycle and to duplicate genome segregation, leading to chromosomal instability and cell transformation [15]. Chronic exposure to TiO2-NPs resulted in the inhibition of growth, a decrease in the liver weight ratio, and histopathological changes in the gills in zebrafish [16].
With regard to the biological effects mediated by NPs, evidence was provided to support the notion that NPs-mediated cellular response was size-dependent, which may provide important insights on our understanding of nanotoxicity [17]. In mice exposed to subchronic concentrations of TiO2-NPs through the skin, significant decreases in body weight were observed after exposure to TiO2-NPs of diameter 10 nm, 25 nm and 21 nm (P25), whereas no obvious differences in body weight were found after exposure to TiO2-NPs of diameter 60 nm, and it is unclear the expression and order of 10 nm, 25 nm, and 21 nm (P25) TiO2-NPs [11]. In zebrafish, the acute toxicity of TiO2-NPs was greater than that of bulk TiO2 [18]. In Caenorhabditis elegans, acute exposure to TiO2-NPs of diameter 25 nm increased mortality, whereas acute exposure to 100-nm TiO2-NPs elicited no obvious effects in nematodes [19]. TiO2-NPs of diameter 7 nm seemed to be more toxic than 20-nm TiO2-NPs in nematodes [20]. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms underpinning the formation of size-dependent toxicity for TiO2-NPs are largely unclear.
The adverse effects of NPs exposure include (at the very least) oxidative stress, mitochondrial perturbation, inflammation, protein denaturation, protein degradation, altered regulation of the cell cycle and DNA damage [2]. For the development of toxicity of TiO2-NPs, oxidative stress may be induced by deposited TiO2-NPs. This is because the assay on levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in mice and TiO2-NPs enhanced the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cultured fibroblast cells [11], [15]. Oxidative stress was shown to develop in the brain, liver and gut tissues of rainbow trout or zebrafish as indicated by biomarkers of oxidative stress [18], [21]. However, the molecular basis for oxidative stress in the induction of TiO2-NPs toxicity is largely unknown.
C. elegans is a free-living nematode found mainly in the liquid phase of soils. It is one of the most thoroughly studied model animals. It has been developed in various environmental studies to address the toxicological effects of a wide range of toxicants from the molecular to individual level [22]. Lethal and sublethal endpoints, including development, reproduction, metabolism, and locomotion behavior can be used for environmental toxicological studies [23]–[36]. Recently, C. elegans has been used for the evaluation of the toxicity of Zn-NPs, Al-NPs, Ag-NPs, Si-NPs, Ce-NPs, TiO2-NPs, metallofullerenol and quantum dots [20], [30]–[31], [34]–[44]. It has been reported that acute exposure to TiO2-NPs at relatively high concentrations causes an increase in the mortality, inhibition of growth, reduction of reproduction, and alteration of gene expression patterns in C. elegans [20], [37]. However, the role of oxidative stress in the formation of the toxicity differences in nematodes exposed to TiO2-NPs at different nanolevels is unclear. In addition, the possible adverse effects of TiO2-NPs at predicted environmental relevant concentrations in nematodes are not known. In C. elegans, oxidative stress is controlled mainly by the genes of: sod-1, sod-2, sod-3, sod-4, and sod-5 encoding five SODs; ctl-1, ctl-2, and ctl-3 encoding three catalases; clk-1 and clk-2 encoding a ubiquinone biosynthetic enzyme and a homolog of yeast Tel2p; isp-1 encoding the “Rieske” iron-sulfur protein; gas-1 encoding a subunit of mitochondrial complex I required for oxidative phosphorylation; and mev-1 encoding a subunit of the enzyme succinate dehydrogenase cytochrome b [45]–[51].
In the present study, we investigated the molecular basis of oxidative stress in inducing the differences in toxicity for TiO2-NPs of different sizes using C. elegans as the assay system. Our data suggested that Mn-SODs proteins may contribute to the formation of different toxicities for different sizes of TiO2-NPs at predicted environmental relevant concentrations.
Results
Adverse effects of different sizes of TiO2-NPs on survival, growth and reproduction of nematodes
Previous study demonstrated that C. elegans can be employed to assess the toxicity of nanomaterials at predicted environmental relevant concentrations by exposing C. elegans from L1-larvae to adults [42]. The effects of exposure to TiO2-NPs at predicated environmental relevant concentrations upon nematodes are unclear. Hence, we first investigated the possible adverse effects of exposure to TiO2-NPs at predicated environmental relevant concentrations upon the survival, growth, and reproduction of nematodes by exposing C. elegans from L1-larvae to adults. Exposure to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at concentrations from 0.001 µg/L to 10 µg/L, and exposure to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at concentrations from 0.001 and 0.01 µg/L did not obviously influence the survival of nematodes (Fig. 1A). In contrast, exposure to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at concentrations from 0.1 µg/L to 10 µg/L significantly (p<0.01) increased the mortality of nematodes (Fig. 1A).
The endpoint of growth was relatively less sensitive than the endpoint of lethality when assessing the toxicity of exposure to TiO2-NPs at predicated environmental relevant concentrations. Exposure to all the examined sizes of TiO2-NPs at concentrations of 0.001–0.1 µg/L did not obviously influence the growth of nematodes as reflected by body length (Fig. 1B). Exposure to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at concentrations of 1–10 µg/L also did not noticeably affect the growth of nematodes (Fig. 1B). However, the body lengths of nematodes exposed to 1 and 10 µg/L of 4-nm or 10-nm TiO2-NPs were significantly (p<0.01) decreased compared with those of control nematodes (Fig. 1B).
We further examined the possible effects of TiO2-NPs exposure at predicated environmental relevant concentrations on the reproduction of nematodes using brood size as the endpoint. Exposure to 0.001 µg/L of all the examined TiO2-NPs, as well as exposure to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.01 and 0.1 µg/L, did not cause alterations in the brood size of nematodes (Fig. 1C). In contrast, exposure to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.01 and 0.1 µg/L significantly (p<0.01) reduced the brood size of nematodes (Fig. 1C). Exposure to all the examined TiO2-NPs at 1 and 10 µg/L also significantly (p<0.01) decreased the brood size of nematodes (Fig. 1C). These data implied that reproduction was relatively more sensitive than lethality and growth if assessing the toxicity of TiO2-NPs in nematodes.
Adverse effects of different sizes of TiO2-NPs on locomotion behavior of nematodes
Locomotion behavior is a relatively sensitive endpoint if evaluating the toxicity of a specific toxicant in C. elegans [52]. Next, we investigated the effects of TiO2-NPs exposure at predicated environmentally relevant concentrations on locomotion behavior by evaluating the body bend, head thrash, and forward turn of nematodes. Exposure to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.001 and 0.01 µg/L did not obviously influence the body bends and head thrashes of nematodes (Figs 1D and 1E). In contrast, exposure to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.001 µg/L moderately but significantly (p<0.05) suppressed the body bends and head thrashes of nematodes, and exposure to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.01 µg/L significantly (p<0.01) decreased the body bends and head thrashes of nematodes (Figs 1D and 1E). Moreover, exposure to all the examined TiO2-NPs at 0.1–10 µg/L significantly (p<0.01) reduced the frequencies of body bends and head thrashes of nematodes (Figs 1D and 1E). Different from the observations on body bend and head thrash, forward turn was less sensitive than body bend and head thrash if assessing the toxicity of TiO2-NPs in nematodes. Exposure to all the examined TiO2-NPs at 0.001–0.01 µg/L and exposure to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.1 µg/L did not noticeably affect forward turns (Fig. 1F). Significantly (p<0.01) reduced forward turns were observed in nematodes exposed to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.1–10 µg/L as well as in those exposed to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 1–10 µg/L (Fig. 1F).
Effects of different sizes of TiO2-NPs on intestinal autofluorescence of nematodes
Intestinal autofluorescence is a valuable marker of damage in intestinal cells in nematodes [53]. Our data suggested that exposure to all the examined TiO2-NPs at 0.001–0.1 µg/L as well as 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 1 µg/L did not induce noticeable increases in intestinal autofluorescence compared with those in controls (Figs 1G and 1H). In contrast, exposure to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at 1–10 µg/L significantly (p<0.01) induced an increase in intestinal autofluorescence compared with controls (Figs 1G and 1H). In addition, exposure to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 10 µg/L moderately but significantly (p<0.05) increased intestinal autofluorescence compared with those seen in controls (Figs 1G and 1H). These data implied that the possible obvious damage in intestinal cells was formed only in nematodes exposed to relatively high concentrations of TiO2-NPs.
Effects of different sizes of TiO2-NPs on ROS production of nematodes
We further investigated the possible effects of TiO2-NPs exposure at predicated environmental relevant concentrations on the ROS production of nematodes. Interestingly, although no obvious induction was observed in nematodes exposed to all the examined TiO2-NPs at 0.001 µg/L, significant (p<0.01) induction of ROS production was detected in nematodes exposed to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.01–10 µg/L compared with those in controls (Figs 2A and 2B). In contrast, only exposure to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 1–10 µg/L activated a significant (p<0.01) increase in ROS production in nematodes compared with those observed in controls (Figs 2A and 2B).
Associations of ROS production with lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior and intestinal autofluorescence in nematodes exposed to TiO2-NPs
Linear regression analyses were undertaken to examine the possible associations of ROS production with lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior and intestinal autofluorescence in nematodes exposed to different sizes of TiO2-NPs. The dependent variables were lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior and intestinal autofluorescence, and the independent variable was ROS production. Under our experimental conditions, ROS production was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.985, p<0.01), growth (R2 = 0.986, p<0.01), reproduction (R2 = 0.828, p<0.05), body bend (R2 = 0.935, p<0.01), head thrash (R2 = 0.916, p<0.01), forward turn (R2 = 0.996, p<0.01), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.967, p<0.01) in nematodes exposed to 4-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S1). ROS production was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.992, p<0.01), growth (R2 = 0.985, p<0.01), reproduction (R2 = 0.809, p<0.05), body bend (R2 = 0.960, p<0.01), head thrash (R2 = 0.949, p<0.01), forward turn (R2 = 0.978, p<0.01), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.918, p<0.01) in nematodes exposed to 10-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S1). ROS production was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.944, p<0.01), growth (R2 = 0.724, p<0.05), reproduction (R2 = 0.868, p<0.01), body bend (R2 = 0.837, p<0.05), head thrash (R2 = 0.839, p<0.05), forward turn (R2 = 0.992, p<0.01), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.878, p<0.01) in nematodes exposed to 60-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S1). ROS production was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.981, p<0.01), growth (R2 = 0.719, p<0.05), reproduction (R2 = 0.900, p<0.01), body bend (R2 = 0.795, p<0.05), head thrash (R2 = 0.837, p<0.05), forward turn (R2 = 0.997, p<0.01), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.904, p<0.01) in nematodes exposed to 90-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S1). Therefore, ROS production was significantly correlated with lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior, and intestinal autofluorescence in nematodes exposed to all the examined TiO2-NPs at predicated environmentally relevant concentrations.
Exposure to TiO2-NPs alters the expression patterns of genes encoding Mn-SODs
In C. elegans, oxidative stress is controlled by key genes such as sod-1, sod-2, sod-3, sod-4, sod-5, ctl-1, ctl-2, ctl-3, clk-1, clk-2, isp-1, gas-1, and mev-1 [45]–[51]. To examine the possible molecular basis of oxidative stress in the induction of toxicity differences in nematodes exposed to different diameters of TiO2-NPs, we investigated the expression patterns of key genes controlling the oxidative stress in nematodes exposed to different sizes of TiO2-NPs at 10 µg/L. Among the 13 genes examined, only the expression patterns of sod-2 and sod-3 genes were noticeably altered (Fig. 2C). Expression levels of the sod-2 gene and sod-3 gene were significantly (p<0.01) increased after exposure to 4-nm, 10-nm, 60-nm, or 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 10 µg/L compared with those observed in controls. The expression patterns of sod-2 and sod-3 genes encoding Mn-SODs in nematodes exposed to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs were also different from those in nematodes exposed to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs (Fig. 2C). Moreover, with the increases of exposure concentrations of different diameters of TiO2-NPs, the expression levels of sod-2 or sod-3 genes increased gradually compared with those of controls (Figs 2D and 2E). In nematodes, expressions of sod-2 and sod-3 genes were significantly increased by exposure to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.001–10 µg/L as well as exposure to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 1–10 µg/L (Figs 2D and 2E). These data suggested that genes encoding Mn-SODs may account for the development of toxicity differences in nematodes exposed to different sizes of TiO2-NPs.
The involvement of sod-2 and sod-3 genes in the control of oxidative stress was analyzed further by linear regression analyses on the associations of sod-2 and sod-3 gene expression with ROS production. The dependent variable was ROS production, and the independent variables were sod-2 and sod-3 gene expressions. Under our experimental conditions, sod-2 gene expression was significantly correlated with ROS production in nematodes exposed to 4-nm (R2 = 0.914, p<0.01), 10-nm (R2 = 0.805, p<0.05), 60 nm (R2 = 0.823, p<0.05) and 90-nm (R2 = 0.913, p<0.01) TiO2-NPs (Table S2). sod-3 gene expression was also significantly correlated with ROS production in nematodes exposed to 4-nm (R2 = 0.745, p<0.05), 10-nm (R2 = 0.807, p<0.05), 60-nm (R2 = 0.915, p<0.01) and 90-nm (R2 = 0.956, p<0.01) TiO2-NPs (Table S2). Similarly, sod-2 or sod-3 gene expression was positively correlated with ROS production in nematodes exposed to 4-nm, 10-nm, 60 nm, and 90-nm TiO2-NPs as assayed by Spearman's rank correlation (Table S3).
Associations of sod-2 and sod-3 gene expression with lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior and intestinal autofluorescence in nematodes exposed to Ti-NPs
Linear regression analyses were carried out to examine the possible associations of sod-2 and sod-3 gene expression with lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior and intestinal autofluorescence in nematodes exposed to different sizes of TiO2-NPs. The dependent variables were lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior and intestinal autofluorescence, and the independent variables were sod-2 and sod-3 gene expressions. sod-2 gene expression was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.860, p<0.01), growth (R2 = 0.921, p<0.01), reproduction (R2 = 0.973, p<0.01), body bend (R2 = 0.985, p<0.01), head thrash (R2 = 0.973, p<0.01), forward turn (R2 = 0.887, p<0.01), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.823, p<0.05) in nematodes exposed to 4-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S2). sod-2 gene expression was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.772, p<0.05), growth (R2 = 0.810, p<0.05), reproduction (R2 = 0.997, p<0.01), body bend (R2 = 0.914, p<0.01), head thrash (R2 = 0.928, p<0.01), forward turn (R2 = 0.753, p<0.05), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.662, p<0.051) in nematodes exposed to 10-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S2). sod-2 gene expression was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.872, p<0.01), growth (R2 = 0.890, p<0.01), reproduction (R2 = 0.944, p<0.01), body bend (R2 = 0.864, p<0.05), head thrash (R2 = 0.859, p<0.01), forward turn (R2 = 0.696, p<0.05), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.681, p<0.05) in nematodes exposed to 60-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S2). sod-2 gene expression was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.966, p<0.01), growth (R2 = 0.874, p<0.01), reproduction (R2 = 0.982, p<0.01), body bend (R2 = 0.944, p<0.01), head thrash (R2 = 0.965, p<0.01), forward turn (R2 = 0.940, p<0.01), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.872, p<0.01) in nematodes exposed to 90-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S2). Similarly, sod-3 gene expression was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.684, p<0.05), growth (R2 = 0.797, p<0.05), reproduction (R2 = 0.918, p<0.01), body bend (R2 = 0.885, p<0.01), head thrash (R2 = 0.859, p<0.01), forward turn (R2 = 0.716, p<0.05), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.664, p<0.05) in nematodes exposed to 4-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S2). sod-3 gene expression was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.702, p<0.05), growth (R2 = 0.807, p<0.05), reproduction (R2 = 0.978, p<0.01), body bend (R2 = 0.905, p<0.01), head thrash (R2 = 0.914, p<0.01), forward turn (R2 = 0.754, p<0.05), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.668, p<0.05) in nematodes exposed to 10-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S2). sod-3 gene expression was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.959, p<0.01), growth (R2 = 0.786, p<0.05), reproduction (R2 = 0.985, p<0.01), body bend (R2 = 0.948, p<0.01), head thrash (R2 = 0.966, p<0.01), forward turn (R2 = 0.952, p<0.01), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.820, p<0.05) in nematodes exposed to 60-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S2). sod-3 gene expression was significantly correlated with lethality (R2 = 0.970, p<0.01), growth (R2 = 0.871, p<0.01), reproduction (R2 = 0.973, p<0.01), body bend (R2 = 0.867, p<0.01), head thrash (R2 = 0.918, p<0.01), forward turn (R2 = 0.975, p<0.01), and intestinal autofluorescence (R2 = 0.875, p<0.01) in nematodes exposed to 90-nm TiO2-NPs (Table S2). Therefore, sod-2 or sod-3 gene expression was significantly correlated with lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior, and intestinal autofluorescence in nematodes exposed to all the examined TiO2-NPs at predicted environmental relevant concentrations.
Ectopically expression of nematode sod-2 or sod-3 prevents the toxicity formation in nematodes exposed to TiO2-NPs
To confirm the important roles of sod-2 and sod-3 genes in regulation of the formation of toxicity in nematodes exposed to different diameters of TiO2-NPs, we investigated the effects of ectopically expression of sod-2 and sod-3 genes upon toxicity development in nematodes exposed to 4-nm TiO2-NPs at 10 µg/L. Ectopically expression of sod-2 or sod-3 genes effectively prevented the increase in mortality, decrease in body length, reduction of brood size, decrease in locomotion behavior (as reflected by body bend, head thrash and forward turn), increase of intestinal autofluorescence, and induction of significant production of ROS formed in nematodes exposed to 4-nm TiO2-NPs at 10 µg/L (Fig. 3).
Ectopically expression of human SOD2 prevents the toxicity formation in nematodes exposed to TiO2-NPs
In humans, the SOD2 gene encodes the Mn-SODs. SOD-2 and SOD-3 in nematodes are highly homologous with SOD2 in humans (Fig. S1). With the aid of the dpy-30 gene promoter to drive the human SOD2 gene to express in all the cells of nematodes [54], we found that ectopically expression of the human SOD2 gene also effectively suppressed the increase in mortality, decrease in body length, reduction of brood size, decrease in locomotion behavior (as reflected by body bend, head thrash and forward turn), increase of intestinal autofluorescence, and induction of significant production of ROS formed in nematodes exposed to 4-nm TiO2-NPs at 10 µg/L (Fig. 4).
Discussion
Studies have shown that acute exposure to 50-nm TiO2-NPs at >100 mg/L causes a significant increase in mortality, and that the median lethal concentration (LC50) of nematodes acutely exposed to 25-nm TiO2-NPs was 77 mg/L [19], [37]. Acute exposure to TiO2-NPs (50 nm) at >47.9 mg/L resulted in a significant inhibition of growth, and a reduction of the reproduction of C. elegans [37]. In the present study, after exposure from L1-larvae to adulthood, a significant increase in intestinal autofluorescence was observed in nematodes exposed to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at the concentration of 1 µg/L. A significant increase in mortality, reduction in body length, and decrease of forward turns could be observed in nematodes exposed to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at the concentration of 0.1 µg/L. A significant reduction in brood size and induction of ROS production could be detected in nematodes exposed to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at the concentration of 0.01 µg/L. In particular, significant decreases in body bend and head thrash could be observed in nematodes exposed to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at the concentration of 0.001 µg/L (Figs 1–2). The limit of detection for most methods is not sufficiently low to detect environmentally relevant concentrations of engineered NPs in the range of ng/L to pg/L [55]. The predicted environmental concentrations in water for TiO2-NPs are 16 or 24.5 µg/L [56]–[57]. Therefore, using C. elegans as a bio-indicator, we can effectively assess the possible adverse effects of TiO2-NPs exposure at predicted environmental relevant concentrations on animals. Among the examined endpoints, body bend and head thrash are very sensitive, and can be used to evaluate the potential toxicity of TiO2-NPs exposure at the concentration of 1 ng/L. Similarly, after exposure from L1-larvae to adulthood, nano-CeO2 exhibited adverse effects on nematodes at environmental relevant concentrations [35].
In the present study, we compared the possible differences in toxicities of two groups of TiO2-NPs in nematodes. The first group comprised 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs (small diameters of TiO2-NPs), and the second group comprised 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs (large diameters of TiO2-NPs). When we detected the toxicity of small-size TiO2-NPs at relatively low concentrations, the large size of TiO2-NPs did not usually exhibit toxicity in nematodes. For example, when we observed a significant increase in mortality, reduction in body length, and decrease of forward turns in nematodes exposed to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.1 µg/L, no noticeable alterations in lethality, body length and forward turns were found in nematodes exposed to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.1 µg/L, and the lethality and body length of nematodes exposed to 1–10 µg/L of 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs were also not significantly affected (Figs 1A, 1B, and 1F). Moreover, when we detected a significant reduction in brood size and induction of ROS production in nematodes exposed to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.01–0.1 µg/L, no obvious alterations in brood size and ROS production were found in nematodes exposed to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.01–0.1 µg/L (Fig 1C, Figs 2A and 2B). In particular, when we observed the significant decreases in body bend and head thrash in nematodes exposed to 4-nm and 10-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.001–0.01 µg/L, the body bends and head thrashes in nematodes exposed to 60-nm and 90-nm TiO2-NPs at 0.001–0.01 µg/L were not significantly affected (Fig. 1D and 1E). Therefore, toxicity differences can be formed for different sizes of TiO2-NPs in nematodes exposed to predicted environmental relevant concentrations. These data are consistent with observations on the differences in the acute toxicity of TiO2-NPs with different nano levels in C. elegans [19]–[20]. Our data are also in agreement with the observations on the toxicity differences of TiO2-NPs with different nano levels in zebrafish and mice [11], [18].
ROS production was closely correlated with lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior and intestinal autofluorescence in nematodes exposed to different diameters of TiO2-NPs at predicted environmentally relevant concentrations (Table S1). Hence, we investigated the possible molecular basis of oxidative stress in regulating the formation of toxicity differences in nematodes exposed to different diameters of TiO2-NPs. Interestingly, exposure to TiO2-NPs only noticeably altered the expression patterns of sod-2 and sod-3 genes among the examined genes controlling the formation of oxidative stress in nematodes (Fig. 2C). In C. elegans, sod-2 and sod-3 genes encode Mn-SODs [48]. The expression levels of sod-2 and sod-3 also increased with the gradual increase in exposure concentrations of the examined TiO2-NPs (Figs 2D and 2E). Moreover, the linear regression analysis indicated that sod-2 gene expression and sod-3 expression were closely correlated with lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior, intestinal autofluorescence, and ROS production in nematodes exposed to all the examined different diameters of TiO2-NPs at predicted environmental relevant concentrations (Table S2). These data suggested that the specific expression patterns of Mn-SODs may explain the toxicity differences of Ti-NPs at different nano levels in animals. That is, the formation of toxicity differences from exposures to different sizes of TiO2-NPs may be primarily due to the formation of different expression levels of Mn-SODs in nematodes exposed to different sizes of TiO2-NPs. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that specific gene expression patterns may form in nematodes exposed to different diameters of TiO2-NPs. For example, exposure to 7-nm TiO2-NPs and exposure to 20-nm TiO2-NPs have been demonstrated to exhibit different expression patterns of gene cyp35a2, which encodes a xenobiotic metabolism enzyme in nematodes [20]. Analyses of the expression of an entire genome revealed the differential effects of TiO2 nanotubes on vascular cells [58]. Analyses of the expression of an entire genome may help us to further reveal the possible specific gene expression patterns formed in nematodes exposed to TiO2-NPs at different nano levels in C. elegans. Increasing evidence has suggested that TiO2-NPs toxicity is dependent not only upon size, but also varies with particle shape, surface coating and functionalization [59]. Therefore, the other possible molecular mechanisms explaining the influences of particle shape, surface coating and functionalization on the formation of TiO2-NPs toxicity need the further elucidation.
Previous in vivo toxicity assays on TiO2-NPs suggested that subchronic dermal exposure to TiO2-NPs resulted in the significant changes in levels of SOD and MDA in the skin and liver tissues of mice, implying that pathological lesions may be mediated through the oxidative stress induced by deposited TiO2-NPs [11]. Similarly, alterations in the levels of biomarkers of oxidative stress suggested the formation of oxidative stress in the liver and gut tissues of zebrafish or the brains of rainbow trout [18], [21]. Nevertheless, no direct evidence has been provided to prove the important role of oxidative stress in inducing the formation of in vivo toxicity by TiO2-NPs. Our data indicated that ectopically expression of the human SOD2 gene and nematode sod-2 and sod-3 genes not only prevented the induction of ROS production but also prevented the formation of toxicity in nematodes as assessed by the endpoints of lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior and intestinal autofluorescence in nematodes exposed to TiO2-NPs (Figs 3 and 4). These findings provided direct evidence of the key role of oxidative stress in inducing the in vivo toxicity of TiO2-NPs. In humans, SOD2 encodes Mn-SODs, a major mitochondrial antioxidative enzyme that constitutes an important “control switch” in the generation of oxidative signals [60]. In the present study, we investigated the toxicological effects of exposure to NPs on humans by generating transgenic strains in nematodes for specific human genes.
In summary, the present study showed that toxicity differences formed in nematodes exposed to different diameters of TiO2-NPs at predicted environmental relevant concentrations when using lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior, intestinal autofluorescence, and ROS production as endpoints. Our data also imply that the intestine, neuron, and reproductive organs may serve as the target organs for TiO2-NPs in nematodes. Among the examined endpoints, ROS production was closely correlated with other endpoints in nematodes exposed to TiO2-NPs. Exposure to TiO2-NPs altered the expression patterns of only sod-2 and sod-3 genes (which encode the Mn-SODs) among the examined genes regulating oxidative stress in nematodes. sod-2 gene expression and sod-3 gene expression were closely correlated with lethality, growth, reproduction, locomotion behavior, intestinal autofluorescence, and ROS production in nematodes exposed to TiO2-NPs. In particular, ectopically expression of human and nematode Mn-SODs prevented the induction of ROS production and the toxicity formation in nematodes exposed to TiO2-NPs. Therefore, our data reveal the possible molecular basis for oxidative stress in regulation of the formation of toxicity differences from different sizes of TiO2-NPs at predicted environmental relevant concentrations.
Materials and Methods
Reagents and preparation of TiO2-NPs suspensions
Nanosized TiO2-NPs powders (4 nm and 10 nm; Zhejiang Wanjin Material Technology Co., Ltd, Zhejiang, China; 60 nm and 90 nm, Zhejiang Hongsheng Material Technology Co., Ltd, Zhejiang, China) were used without coating. The purities of these TiO2-NPs were 99.5% (4 nm), 99.5% (10 nm), 99.6% (60 nm), and 99.5% (90 nm). The particle diameters of these TiO2-NPs were 4±1 nm (4 nm), 10±1 nm (10 nm), 60±9 nm (60 nm), and 90±10 nm (90 nm). The surface properties of these TiO2-NPs were hydrophobic. The surface area of these TiO2-NPs was 200 m2/g (4 nm), 160 m2/g (10 nm), 41 m2/g (60 nm), and 40 m2/g (90 nm) based on measurement by N2 sorption at 77 K using a NOVA 1000e Surface Area Analyzer (Nova, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). The prepared stock suspension concentrations of TiO2-NPs were 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 µg/L. A series of stock suspensions of TiO2-NPs was dispersed in K-medium (32 mM KCl, 51 mM NaCl) [23] by probe sonication at 100 W and 40 kHz for 30 min to form the suspensions used. During testing periods, the suspension of TiO2-NPs was stable and uniform in the K-medium throughout the experimental period, which was confirmed by observations under the microscope. All the other chemicals were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Strain preparation
The nematodes used in the present study were wild-type N2, originally obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resource, Bethesda, MD, USA) and transgenic strains of Ex(Psod-2-sod-2), Ex(Psod-3-sod-3), and Ex(Pdpy-30-SOD2), which were maintained on nematode growth medium (NGM) plates seeded with Escherichia coli OP50 at 20°C as described [61]. Gravid nematodes were washed off the plates into centrifuge tubes, and were lysed with a bleaching mixture (0.45 M NaOH, 2% HOCl). Age-synchronized populations of L1-larval nematodes were obtained by the collection as described [24]. Exposures to different nano-sizes of TiO2-NPs at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 µg/L were done from the L1-larval stage in 12-well sterile tissue culture plates in a 20°C incubator in the presence of food. The nematodes were used for toxicity evaluation using lethality, growth, locomotion behavior, reproduction, intestinal autofluorescence, and ROS production as endpoints and for the gene expression pattern analysis when they developed into young adults.
Lethality
A 1.0-mL aliquot of test solution for TiO2-NPs was added to each well of the tissue culture plates, which was subsequently loaded with 50 nematodes for each concentration. Fifty nematodes were loaded in each well, and three replicated were performed. After exposure, the inactive ones were scored under a dissecting microscope. Nematodes were judged to be dead if they did not respond to a stimulus using a small, metal wire. Lethality was evaluated by the percentage of surviving animals.
Locomotion behavior
Locomotion behavior was assessed by the endpoints of head thrash, body bend and forward turn [52]. To assess head thrash, each examined nematode was transferred into a microtiter well containing 60 µL of modified K-medium on the top of agar. Head thrashes were counted for 1 min after a 1-min recovery period. A thrash was defined as a change in the direction of bending at the middle of the body. To evaluate the body bend, nematodes were placed onto a second plate and the number of body bends over 20 s was recorded. A body bend was considered to be a change in the direction of the part of the nematode corresponding to the posterior bulb of the pharynx along the y axis assuming that the nematode was traveling along the x axis. To evaluate a forward turn, forward sinusoidal movement in a 30-s interval was measured. Fifty nematodes were examined per treatment.
Reproduction
After exposure in 1.0-mL aliquot of test solution for TiO2-NPs, reproduction was assessed by brood size of adult nematodes. To assess the brood size, we counted the number of offspring at all stages after the egg stage. Twenty replicates were examined per treatment.
Growth
After exposure in 1.0-mL aliquot of test solution for TiO2-NPs, growth was assessed by body length. Body length was determined by measuring the flat surface area of young adult nematodes using Image-Pro® Express software. Twenty replicates were examined per treatment.
Intestinal autofluorescence
Intestinal autofluorescence is caused by lysosomal deposits of lipofuscin, which can accumulate over time in aging nematodes [53]. Images were collected for fluorescence in the endogenous intestine using a 525-nm bandpass filter and without automatic gain control to preserve the relative intensity of the fluorescence of different animals. Nematodes were photographed on the same day to avoid the effects of variance in light sources on fluorescence intensity. Fluorescence was recorded and color images taken for the documentation of results with Magnafire® software (Olympus, Irving, TX, USA). Lipofuscin levels were measured using ImageJ Software (NIH Image, Bethesda, MD, USA) by determining the mean pixel intensity in the intestine of each animal. Twenty replicates were examined per treatment.
ROS production
To ascertain if TiO2-NPs treatment activated oxidative damage, ROS production was assayed. Nematodes were transferred to M9 buffer containing 1 µM of 5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate, acetyl ester (CM-H2DCFDA) to pre-incubate for 3 h at 20°C, and then mounted on agar pads for examination with a Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope (Leica, TCS SP2, Bensheim, Germany) at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and emission wavelength of 510 nm. The relative fluorescence intensities of the intestines were semi-quantified. The semi-quantified ROS were expressed as relative fluorescent units (RFU). Twenty replicates were examined per treatment.
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA of nematodes was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Total RNA was reverse-transcribed using cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA , USA), and real-time PCR was performed using primers for target genes of clk-1 (forward primer, 5′-CACATACTGCTGCTTCTCGT-3′; reverse primer, 5′-TGAACCAACAGATGAACCTT-3′), clk-2 (forward primer, 5′-TATCCTTTGTTGGTTTTGCC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-CAAATACACTCTACACCGCA-3′), ctl-1 (forward primer, 5′-CTCCTACACGGACACGCAT-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GCATCTCCCTGGCTTTCAT-3′), ctl-2 (forward primer, 5′-CGAACAGCTTCAACTATGG-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GTGGCTGGGAATGTGGTAT-3′), ctl-3 (forward primer, 5′-TTCTCCTACACGGACACGC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GCATCTCCCTGGCTTTCAT-3′), gas-1 (forward primer, 5′-CTTGGTCTTTGGCTGTTGA-3′; reverse primer, 5′-CTTGGTCTTTGGCTGTTGA-3′), isp-1 (forward primer, 5′-GCAGAAAGATGAATGGTCC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-CAGAAGCGTCGTAGTGAGA-3′), mev-1 (forward primer, 5′-GGAATTCGCTTCTTAGGAT-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GCAGTCTTGTTGCTCTTGT-3′), sod-1 (forward primer, 5′-ACGCTCGTCACGCTTTAC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-TCTTCTGCCTTGTCTCCG-3′), sod-2 (forward primer, 5′-GGCATCAACTGTCGCTGT-3′; reverse primer, 5′-ACAAGTCCAGTTGTTGCC-3′) and sod-3 (forward primer, 5′-TGACATCACTATTGCGGT-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GGGACCATTCCTTCCAAA-3′), sod-4 (forward primer, 5′-CACCAGATGACTCGAACA-3′; reverse primer, 5′-AATGAGGCAAGAGAGTCG-3′), sod-5 (forward primer, 5′-ATATTGCCAATGCCGTTC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-CTCTTCACCTTCGGCTTT-3′), SOD2 (forward primer, 5′-AGGAACGGGGACACTTAC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GAAGGTAGTAAGCGTGCT-3′), and reference gene of act-1 (forward primer, 5′-CTGCAGATGTGTGACGACGAGGTT-3′; reverse primer, 5′-CTGCAGGAAGCACTTGCGGTGAAC-3′). Relative quantification of target genes in comparison to reference act-1 gene was determined, and the final results were expressed as relative expression ratio (between target gene and reference gene) in the treatments as compared to the ratio in the control. Five replicates were performed per treatment.
DNA construct and germline transformation
The sod-2 (1166 bp, HindIII/SmaI) or sod-3 (1869 bp, BamHI/SmaI) gene promoter fragment was subcloned into the pPD95_75 vector, and the sod-2 or sod-3 full length cDNA was inserted into the site of SmaI/KpnI of the pPD95_75 vector behind Psod-2 or Psod-3 fragment to obtain plasmid of Psod-2-sod-2 or Psod-3-sod-3. To construct the plasmid of Pdpy-30-SOD2, dpy-30 gene promoter fragment (1907 bp, PstI/BamHI) was subcloned into the pPD95_75 vector, and the human SOD2 full length cDNA was inserted into the site of SmaI/KpnI of the pPD95_75 vector behind Pdpy-30 fragment. Transgenic nematodes of Ex(Psod-2-sod-2), Ex(Psod-3-sod-3), and Ex(Pdpy-30-SOD2) were generated as described [62]. The plasmids were injected as a mix at 20 ng/µl using Pdop-1::rfp as a transgenic marker. Ectopically expressions of nematodes genes of sod-2 and sod-3 and human SOD2 gene were confirmed by real-time PCR (Fig S2).
Statistical analysis
All data were expressed as means±standard error of the mean (S.E.M.). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significance of differences between the groups. Probability levels of 0.05 and 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Associations of ROS production and gene expression with other endpoints were assessed with linear regression analysis. Correlations between sod-2 or sod-3 gene expression and ROS production were also analyzed by Spearman's rank correlation.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The wild-type nematode strain used in this study was provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resource, USA). We thank Dan Chase for the pCL40 (Pdop-1::rfp) vector.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants from the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2011CB933404), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81172698), the Postdoctoral Foundation of China (No. 2011M500835), the Postdoctoral Foundation in Jiangsu Province of China, the Special Postdoctoral Supporting Plan in Southeast University, and the Supporting Program in the Key Laboratory of Developmental Genes and Human Disease in Ministry of Education (201104). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Stone V, Donaldosn K (2006) Nanotoxicology: signs of stress. Nat Nanotechnol 1: 23–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311: 622–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lomer MC, Hutchinson C, Volkert S, Greenfield SM, Catterall A, et al. (2004) Dietary sources of inorganic microparticles and their intake in healthy subjects and patients with Crohn's disease. Br J Nutr 92: 947–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113: 823–839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wang J, Zhou G, Chen C, Yu H, Wang T, et al. (2007) Acute toxicity and biodistribution of different sized titanium dioxide particles in mice after oral administration. Toxicol Lett 168: 176–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ma-Hock L, Burkhardt S, Strauss V, Gamer AO, Wiench K, et al. (2009) Development of a short-term inhalation test in the rat using nano-titanium dioxide as a model substance. Inhal Toxicol 21: 102–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chen J, Dong X, Zhao J, Tang G (2009) In vivo acute toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to mice after intraperitionneal injection. J Appl Toxicol 29: 330–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ma L, Zhao J, Wang J, Wang J, Liu J, et al. (2009) The acute liver injury in mice caused by nano-anatase TiO2 . Nanoscale Res Lett 4: 1275–1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tang M, Zhang T, Xue Y, Wang S, Huang M, et al. (2010) Dose dependent in vivo metabolic characteristics of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10: 8575–8583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hougaard KS, Jackson P, Jensen KA, Sloth JJ, Löschner K, et al. (2010) Effects of prenatal exposure to surface-coated nanosized titanium dioxide (UV-Titan). A study in mice. Part Fibre Toxicol 7: 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wu J, Liu W, Xue C, Zhou S, Lan F, et al. (2009) Toxicity and penetration of TiO2 nanoparticles in hairless mice and porcine skin after subchronic dermal exposure. Toxicol Lett 191: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shimizu M, Tainaka H, Oba T, Mizuo K, Umezawa M, et al. (2009) Maternal exposure to nanoparticulate titanium dioxide during the prenatal period alters gene expression related to brain development in the mouse. Part Fibre Toxicol 6: 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yamashita K, Yoshioka Y, Higashisaka K, Mimura K, Morishita Y, et al. (2011) Silica and titanium dioxide nanoparticles cause pregnancy complications in mice. Nat Nanotechnol 6: 321–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lovern SB, Klaper R (2006) Daphnia magna mortality when exposed to titanium dioxide and fullerene (C60) nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 25: 1132–1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Huang S, Shueh PJ, Lin Y, Shih T, Chuang S (2009) Disturbed mitotic progression and genome segregation are involved in cell transformation mediated by nano-TiO2 long-term exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 241: 182–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Chen J, Dong X, Xin Y, Zhao M (2011) Effects of titanium dioxide nano-particles on growth and some histological parameters of zebrafish (Danio retio) after long-term exposure. Aquat Toxicol 101: 493–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jiang W, Kim BS, Rutka JT, Chan WCW (2008) Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent. Nat Nanotechnol 3: 145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Xiong D, Fang T, Yu L, Sima X, Zhu W (2011) Effects of nano-scale TiO2, ZnO and their bulk counterparts on zebrafish: acute toxicity, oxidative stress and oxidative damage. Sci Total Environ 490: 1444–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Khare P, Sonane M, Pandey R, Ali S, Gupta KC, et al. (2011) Adverse effects of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles in soil nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans . J Biomed Nanotechnol 7: 116–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Roh J, Park Y, Park K, Choi J (2010) Ecotoxicological investigation of CeO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles on the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans using gene expression, growth, fertility, and survival as endpoints. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 29: 167–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Federici G, Shaw B, Handy R (2007) Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): gill injury, oxidative stress, and other physiological effects. Aquat Toxicol 84: 415–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Leung MCK, Williams PL, Benedetto A, Au C, Helmcke KJ, et al. (2008) Caenorhabditis elegans: an emerging model in biomedical and environmental toxicology. Toxicol Sci 106: 5–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Williams PL, Dusenbery DB (1990) Aquatic toxicity testing using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Environ Toxicol Chem 9: 1285–1290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Donkin SG, Dusenbery DB (1993) A soil toxicity test using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and an effective method of recovery. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 25: 145–151. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Anderson GL, Boyd WA, Williams PL (2001) Assessment of sublethal endpoints for toxicity testing with the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 833–838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hu Y-O, Wang Y, Ye B-P, Wang D-Y (2008) Phenotypic and behavioral defects induced by iron exposure can be transferred to progeny in Caenorhabditis elegans . Biomed Environ Sci 21: 467–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Shen L-L, Xiao J, Ye H-Y, Wang D-Y (2009) Toxicity evaluation in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans after chronic metal exposure. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 28: 125–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Xing X-J, Guo Y-L, Wang D-Y (2009) Using the larvae nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to evaluate neurobehavioral toxicity to metallic salts. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 72: 1819–1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Guo Y-L, Yang Y-C, Wang D-Y (2009) Induction of reproductive deficits in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to metals at different developmental stages. Reprod Toxicol 28: 90–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ma H, Bertsch PM, Glenn TC, Kabengi NJ, Williams PL (2009) Toxicity of manufactured zinc oxide nanoparticles in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Environ Toxicol Chem 28: 1324–1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Meyer JN, Lord CA, Yang XY, Turner EA, Badireddy AR, et al. (2010) Intracellular uptake and associated toxicity of silver nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans . Aquat Toxicol 100: 140–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wang D-Y, Xing X-J (2010) Pre-treatment with mild UV irradiation suppresses reproductive toxicity induced by subsequent cadmium exposure in nematodes. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 73: 423–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wang D-Y, Liu P-D, Xing X-J (2010) Pretreatment with mild UV irradiation increases the resistance of nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to toxicity on locomotion behavior from metal exposure. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 29: 213–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Qu Y, Li W, Zhou Y, Liu X, Zhang L, et al. (2011) Full assessment of fate and physiological behavior of quantum dots utilizing Caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism. Nano Lett 11: 3174–3183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Zhang W, Sun B, Zhang L, Zhao B, Nie G, et al. (2011) Biosafety assessment of Gd@C82(OH)22 nanoparticles on Caenorhabditis elegans Nanoscale. 3: 2636–2641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Wu S, Lu J–H, Rui Q, Yu S–H, Cai T, et al. (2011) Aluminum nanoparticle exposure in L1 larvae results in more severe lethality toxicity than in L4 larvae or young adults by strengthening the formation of stress response and intestinal lipofuscin accumulation in nematodes. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 31: 179–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wang H, Wick RL, Xing B (2009) Toxicity of nanoparticulate and bulk ZnO, Al2O3 and TiO2 to the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Environ Pollut 157: 1171–1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Roh J, Sim SJ, Yi J, Park K, Chung KH, et al. (2009) Ecotoxicity of silver nanoparticles on the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans using functional ecotoxicogenomics. Environ Sci Technol 43: 3933–3940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Pluskota A, Horzowski E, Bossinger O, von Mikecz A (2009) In Caenorhabditis elegans nanoparticle-bio-interactions become transparent: silica-nanoparticles induce reproductive senescence. PLoS ONE 4: e6622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Ma H, Kabengi NJ, Bertsch PM, Unrine JM, Glenn TC, et al. (2011) Comparative phototoxicity of nanoparticulate and bulk ZnO to a free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: the importance of illumination mode and primary particle size. Environ Pollut 159: 1473–1480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Yu S–H, Rui Q, Cai T, Li Y–X, Wang D-Y (2011) Close association of intestinal autofluorescence with the formation of severe oxidative damage in intestine of nematodes chronically exposed to Al2O3-nanoparticle. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 32: 233–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Zhang H, He X, Zhang Z, Zhang P, Li Y, et al. (2011) Nano-CeO2 exhibits adverse effects at environmental relevant concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 45: 3725–3730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li Y-X, Yu S-H, Wu Q-L, Tang M, Wang D-Y (2012) Transmissions of serotonin, dopamine and glutamate are required for the formation of neurotoxicity from Al2O3-NPs in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Nanotoxicology doi: 10.3109/17435390.2012.689884. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 44. Li Y-X, Yu S-H, Wu Q-L, Tang M, Pu Y-P, et al. (2012) Chronic Al2O3-nanoparticle exposure causes neurotoxic effects on locomotion behaviors by inducing severe ROS production and disruption of ROS defense mechanisms in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . J Hazard Mat 219–220: 221–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ishii N, Fujii M, Hartman PS, Tsuda M, Yasuda K, et al. (1998) A mutation in succinate dehydrogenase cytochrome b causes oxidative stress and ageing in nematodes. Nature 394: 694–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Stenmark P, Grunler J, Mattsson J, Sindelar PJ, Nordlund P, et al. (2001) A new member of the family of di-iron carboxylate proteins. Coq7 (clk-1), a membrane-bound hydroxylase involved in ubiquinone biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 276: 33297–33300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Feng J, Bussiere F, Hekimi S (2001) Mitochondrial electron transport is a key determinant of life span in Caenorhabditis elegans . Dev Cell 1: 633–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ahmed S, Alpi A, Hengartner MO, Gartner A (2001) C. elegans RAD-5/CLK-2 defines a new DNA damage checkpoint protein. Curr Biol 11: 1934–1944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Kayser EB, Morgan PG, Hoppel CL, Sedensky MM (2001) Mitochondrial expression and function of GAS-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans . J Biol Chem 276: 20551–20558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Yang W, Li J, Hekimi S (2007) A measurable increase in oxidative damage due to reduction in superoxide detoxification fails to shorten the life span of long-lived mitochondrial mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 177: 2063–2074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vigneshkumar B, Pandian SK, Balamurugan K (2011) Catalase activity and innate immune response of Caenorhabditis elegans against the heavy metal toxin lead. Environ Toixicol doi: 10.1002/tox.20722. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 52. Wang D-Y, Xing X-J (2008) Assessment of locomotion behavioral defects induced by acute toxicity from heavy metal exposure in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . J Environ Sci 20: 1132–1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Shen L–L, Hu Y–O, Cai T, Lin X–F, Wang D-Y (2010) Regulation of longevity by genes required for the functions of AIY interneuron in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. . Mech Ageing Dev 131: 732–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Hsu DR, Meyer BJ (1994) The dpy-30 gene encodes an essential component of the Caenorhabditis elegans dosage compensation machinery. Genetics 137: 999–1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Hassellöv M, Readman JW, Ranville JF, Tiede K (2008) Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17: 344–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Tiede K, Hassellöv M, Breitbarth E, Chaudhry Q, Boxall ABA (2009) Considerations for environmental fate and ecotoxicity testing to support environmental risk assessments for engineered nanoparticles. J Chromatography A 1216: 503–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Mueller N, Nowack B (2008) Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42: 4447–4453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Peng L, Barczak AJ, Barbeau RA, Xiao Y, LaTempa TJ, et al. (2010) Whole genome expression analysis reveals differential effects of TiO2 nanotubes on vascular cells. Nano Lett 10: 143–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Johnston HJ, Hutchison GR, Christensen FM, Peters S, Hankin S, et al. (2009) Identification of the mechanisms that drive the toxicity of TiO2 particulates: the contribution of physicochemical characteristics. Part Fibre Toxicol 6: 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kamiński MM, Röth D, Sass S, Sauer SW, Krammer PH, et al. (2012) Manganese superoxide dismutase: a regulator of T cell activation-induced oxidative signaling and cell death. Biochem Biophys Acta 1823: 1041–1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 77: 71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Mello CC, Kramer JM, Stinchcomb D, Ambros V (1991) Efficient gene transfer in C. elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequence. EMBO J 10: 3959–3970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.