Skip to main content
Journal of Lipid Research logoLink to Journal of Lipid Research
. 2012 Oct;53(10):2226–2230. doi: 10.1194/jlr.D026260

A comprehensive method for determination of fatty acids in the initial oral biofilm (pellicle)

Marco Reich *,1, Christian Hannig , Ali Al-Ahmad §, Richard Bolek *, Klaus Kümmerer *
PMCID: PMC3435555  PMID: 22829652

Abstract

The acquired pellicle is a tenacious organic layer covering the surface of teeth, protecting the underlying dental hard tissues. Lipids account for about one quarter of the pellicle's dry weight and are assumed to be of considerable importance for their protective properties. Nevertheless, only preliminary information is available about the nature of lipids in the pellicle. Gas chromatography coupled with electron impact ionization mass spectrometry was used to establish a convenient analytical protocol in order to obtain a qualitative and quantitative characterization of a wide range of FAs (C12–C22). In situ biofilm formation was performed on bovine enamel slabs mounted on individual splints carried by 10 subjects. A modified Folch extraction procedure was adopted to extract the lipids from the detached pellicle, followed by transesterification to fatty acid methyl esters using methanol and concentrated hydrochloric acid. Tridecanoic and nonadecanoic acid were used as internal standards suitable and reliable for robust, precise and accurate measurements. The present study demonstrates, for the first time, a procedure based on a combination of innovative specimen generation and convenient sample preparation with sensitive GC-MS analysis for the determination of the fatty acid profile of the initial oral biofilm.

Keywords: clinical trials, fatty acid, derivatization, saliva, mass spectrometry, in situ


Biofilm formation on dental hard tissues is fundamental for caries and periodontitis, two diseases with extremely high prevalence and considerable economic relevance (16). Dental hard tissues are the only nonshedding surfaces in the human organism. Accordingly, the process of bioadhesion at tooth surfaces is of particular significance for oral diseases (7). The first step is the formation of the pellicle layer, which is mainly composed of adsorbed proteins and other macromolecules from the oral environment (saliva, crevicular fluids) and is clearly distinguished from the microbial biofilm (plaque) (7, 8). The selective process of pellicle formation is driven by physicochemical interactions such as van der Waals forces as well as electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions (7, 9). Serving as a protective lubricant, diffusion barrier, and buffer, the pellicle layer participates in all interfacial events taking place in the oral cavity (8). Furthermore, several antibacterial proteins and enzymes are present in this proteinaceous layer of high tenacity (10, 11). Nevertheless, several bacteria have adapted to this protective structure, as certain pellicle components provide specific receptors for bacterial adhesion to the tooth surface, making the pellicle a conditioning film for bacterial biofilm formation (12, 13). All in all, the pellicle is a key structure, mediating the process of bioadhesion at the tooth surface and the interaction between bacteria, saliva, and teeth. Some properties of the pellicle, such as ultrastructure, amino acid composition, and enzyme activity, have been investigated in detail (7, 8, 13). Therefore, three types of studies have to be differentiated: in vitro studies (pellicle formed in vitro from collected saliva on different materials), in vivo studies (pellicle harvested by scraping with a curette from the tooth surface), and in situ approaches (samples exposed to the oral cavity with splints) (7, 14). In vitro studies do not adequately mimic the situation in the oral cavity due to lacking maturation processes; thus, the in vitro pellicle differs considerably from the in vivo situation (15). Harvesting the in vivo pellicle yields only very small amounts of sample material and the basal structures of the pellicle are not removed sufficiently (14). Accordingly, in situ setups with enamel slabs are preferable and allow evaluation of the pellicle with many elaborate methods. However, there is only limited information on the nature, function, and composition of lipids in the pellicle. Data is predominantly derived from studies carried out in the 1980s and refers exclusively to the workgroup around Slomiany (16, 17). Therefore, further research is required to get a wider understanding of their biological effect in the oral cavity. Lipids in the pellicle are assumed to hamper bacterial adhesion and to protect the tooth surface against erosive noxae. Methods such as GC-MS offer the opportunity to analyze the lipid composition of the pellicle layer more precisely than in previous studies. The aim of the present study was to establish and validate a precise method for the evaluation of the FA pattern of the in situ formed pellicle. Harvesting of the pellicle and the small amount of sample material represents considerable challenges (14).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and standards

A Supelco 37-component fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) mix, a Supelco 23-component Bacterial Acid Methyl Ester (BAME) mix, as well as additional standards of single FA target compounds (12:0, 14:0, a15:0, 15:0, 16:0, 16:1n-9, 18:0, 18:1n9c, 18:2n-6, 20:0, 22:1n-9) and the two internal standards (IS) (13:0, 19:0) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany). Hydrochloric acid, chloroform, methanol, and n-hexane were purchased from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany) in GC ultra grade and LC-MS grade. Water utilized for preparation of standard and extraction solutions was deionized with a Milli-Q purification system (Millipore, Schwalbach/Ts, Germany).

Instrumental conditions

Gas chromatography/electron impact ionization-mass spectrometry (GC/EI-MS) analyses were performed with a Fisons GC 8065 gas chromatograph interfaced with a single-quadrupole Fisons 800 MSD. The samples (1 µl) were injected via a CTC A200S autosampler (splitless, split open after 90 s). The injector and transfer line temperatures were kept at 260°C. A Select FAME fused silica capillary column (50 m × 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 µm film thickness; Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) was used for separation of the target compounds. Helium (purity 5.0) was used as carrier gas with a constant pressure of 100 kPa. The GC temperature program started at 50°C (hold time 5 min) and was increased to 260°C (hold time 8 min) at a ramp rate of 6.5°C/min. A solvent delay of 8 min was applied. The electron energy was 70 eV and the temperature of the ion source was set to 250°C. In the GC/EI-MS full scan mode, m/z 60-400 was recorded. For GC/EI-MS in the selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode, fragment ions including m/z 74, m/z 87, m/z 81, and m/z 79 for FAME were recorded throughout the run (18).

Calibration standards and quality control samples

The Supelco FAME mix and the Supelco BAME mix, including 49 different FAMEs, were used as reference standards to identify the FAs of the pellicle samples. After screening the pellicle samples for the most abundant FAs, a stock solution containing 11 FAs of two levels of concentration (1 mg/ml each of 12:0, 14:0, a15:0, 15:0, 16:1n-9, 18:2n-6, 20:0; 5 mg/l each of 16:0, 18:0, 18:1n-9, 22:1n-9; in methanol) was prepared from the individual FA standards for quantitative analysis. Calibration standards were made up of seven different concentrations, depending on the particular FA, ranging from 12.5 ng/ml to 250 ng/ml and 62.5 ng/ml to 1250 ng/ml, respectively. The final concentrations were yielded by diluting the stock solution with methanol. Quality control (QC) samples were prepared at four different concentrations (30, 175 ng/ml and 150, 875 ng/ml; in 0.4% EDTA solution). The FA stock solution and the QC samples were aliquoted and stored at −20°C under nitrogen.

Subjects and sample collection

Bovine incisors were acquired from two-year-old cattle (BSE-negative). After extraction, the teeth were stored in thymol solution. For sample generation, round enamel slabs (5 mm diameter) were gained from the labial surface of the teeth with a trepan bur. The surface of the enamel slabs was wet-ground with up to 4,000-grit abrasive paper. Afterwards, the samples were disinfected in a sequential procedure in an ultrasonic bath. After 3 min in sodium hypochlorite (2%), the slabs were washed twice in deionized water for 5 min each followed by ultrasonication in ethanol (70%) for 10 min and final cleaning in deionized water for another 10 min. Before exposure to the oral fluids, the slabs were stored in deionized water for 24 h to form a hydration layer (19, 20).

For pellicle formation, the slabs were fixed into small cavities on individual upper jaw splints with silicon impression material (Aquasil, Dentsply De Tray, Konstanz, Germany), so that only the surface was exposed to the oral fluids. 12 slabs per splint were fixed on buccal and palatal sites of the premolars and the first molar (14, 19). After oral exposure for 30 min, the slabs were rinsed for 10 s with saline solution to remove loosely attached salivary fractions. Then the slabs were removed from the splints with a dental probe and transferred to 15 ml Falcon tubes. For the purpose of desorption, the samples were incubated in an ultrasonic bath with 1 ml 0.4% EDTA (pH 7.4) for 60 min (14). The pellicle is a biofilm of high tenacity; therefore, direct and complete extraction of pellicle components is difficult. A previous study indicates that the adopted desorption procedure allows complete and quantitative detachment of the in situ formed pellicle as validated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (14). The desorbed pellicle was pipetted into 1.5 ml amber screw vials and stored at −20°C until analysis.

The age of the subjects participating in this study ranged between 26 and 57 (4 male, 6 female). The subjects showed no signs of caries and periodontitis and the plaque indices were near zero. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the medical faculty of the University of Freiburg (# 222/08).

Sample preparation

The pellicle sample, dissolved in 1 ml 0.4% EDTA solution, was spiked with 30 µl of tridecanoic and nonadecanoic acid (25 µM each in methanol) as IS prior to extraction. A modified Folch extraction procedure (21) was applied in which 3.9 ml of a CHCl3/MeOH (2:1, v/v) solution were added to the desorbed pellicle sample. After vortexing, the mixture was centrifuged at 900 g for 5 min. The lower phase, containing virtually all the lipids, was isolated in a screw-capped glass test tube (16.5 × 105 mm), and the solvent was evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen. Transesterification was carried out based on the method of Ichihara and Fukubayashi (22) and adapted to the pellicle matrix. The sample was dissolved in 0.2 ml of chloroform, 2 ml of methanol, and 0.1 ml of concentrated hydrochloric acid (35%, w/w), which were added in this order to the lipid solution. The final HCl concentration was 1.5% (w/v) in a total volume of 2.3 ml. The solution was overlaid with nitrogen and the tube was tightly closed. After vortexing, the tube was heated at 100°C for 1 h. Once cooled to room temperature, 2 ml of hexane and 2 ml of water were added for extraction of FAMEs. The tube was vortexed and after phase separation, the hexane phase was isolated and evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The residue was redissolved in 0.1 ml of hexane and 1 µl of this solution was injected for GC-MS analysis.

Data evaluation

Retention times (RTs) of the separated FAs as well as the respective mass spectra gained from full scan measurement were used for qualitative analysis. Although EI-ionization was applied, the molecular ion (M+) of each FA was visible in the mass spectrum. Quantification of data obtained from SIM mode measurements was performed using the peak area ratios relative to that of the IS. Least squares regression analysis was implemented, using the peak area ratios against increasing standard concentrations to obtain calibration linearity. Peak area ratios of the unknown samples were referred to this calibration curve. Prior to the sample run, a blank sample and the seven calibration standards were measured. Measurements of the pellicle samples were bracketed by injections of QC samples to validate the results.

Method validation

Statistical analysis was done referring to the guidelines for method validation of the Society of Toxicological and Forensic Chemistry (23). The main performance characteristics evaluated were selectivity over the analyte, linearity of the response, closeness to the true value, precision of the obtained results, and detection and quantification limits. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were defined to be the lowest concentration with a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio > 3 for LOD and 10 for LOQ. The precision expressed as the coefficient of variation (% CV) and the accuracy as the percentage relative error (% bias) were determined from the QC samples at two different concentrations based on the calibration range of each FA. For intraday repeatability, five replicates were analyzed, whereas the interday reproducibility was measured from samples run over 5 nonconsecutive days.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Method validation

The characterization of lipids and their FA profiles via GC-MS is a widely accepted practice (24, 25). Nevertheless, analysis of FAs can be complicated due to cross-contamination because lipids are omnipresent in nature and are constituents of commercial plastics, surfactants, and lubricants (24). As with any analytical procedure, the validity of the results depends on proper sampling and preservation of the sample prior to analysis. The importance of sample preparation is often underestimated and therefore carried out hurriedly and incorrectly. It must be kept in mind that in case of errors occurring during the extraction procedure, even the best analytics is worthless. The described analytical method is reliable when plastic products are avoided whenever possible and all the glassware used is cleaned (e.g., rinsed with methanol) prior to use.

For method validation, parameters such as accuracy, precision, selectivity, and the analytical limits (LOD, LOQ) were evaluated (Table 1). The GC/EI-MS analysis in the SIM mode provided LOQs ranging from 7.6 to 91.8 ng/ml whereas those of most FAs ranged from 7.6 to 28.8 ng/ml, except for 18:0 (83.9 ng/ml) and 22:1n9c (91.8 ng/ml).

TABLE 1.

Validation results of the overall method in the intra- and interday assays

Intraday QClow (n = 5) Intraday QChigh (n = 5) Interday QClow (n = 5) Interday QChigh (n = 5)
RT Linearitya LODb LOQc CVd Accuracyd CV Accuracy CV Accuracy CV Accuracy
FA min r ng/ml ng/ml % % % % % % % %
12:0 22.7 0.9994 5.7 12.1 5.3 94.8 1.8 102.1 13.4 87.2 3.5 99.6
14:0 25.6 0.9993 6.6 12.4 5.7 90.0 6.3 96.0 12.3 84.4 5.9 93.4
a15:0 26.5 0.9999 2.2 7.6 1.1 101.5 3.2 99.9 5.1 101.2 3.3 99.0
15:0 26.9 0.9998 4.6 10.6 1.6 97.1 4.7 97.4 2.6 96.1 3.5 98.0
16:0 28.1 0.9997 8.4 28.8 12.0 102.8 3.2 101.5 12.2 99.1 2.5 101.5
16:1n9c 28.9 0.9991 8.1 13.3 5.9 104.5 3.8 105.6 7.8 102.3 4.7 104.0
18:0 30.4 0.9988 26.4 83.9 2.7 107.1 2.2 106.9 11.2 99.4 1.9 106.3
18:1n9c 30.8 0.9998 8.3 28.6 2.2 101.0 1.9 100.1 6.8 95.9 1.2 99.9
18:2n6c 31.6 0.9998 2.6 9.2 4.6 103.2 1.8 101.0 5.0 100.5 1.6 101.1
20:0 32,4 0.9997 4.5 10.6 6.2 102.9 2.1 99.8 9.0 94.6 1.9 100.9
22:1n9c 34.7 0.9979 29.1 91.8 9.7 102.2 2.8 101.0 6.3 93.9 4.3 100.7
a

Calibration range from 12.5 ng/ml to 250 ng/ml and 62.5 ng/ml to 1250 ng/ml.

b

The limit of detection was measured at S/N ratio > 3.

c

The limit of quantification was measured at S/N ratio > 10.

d

Precision and accuracy were expressed as the mean values of data obtained from QC samples (QClow: 30, 150 ng/ml and QChigh: 175, 875 ng/ml, depending on the particular FA) through intra- and interday assays.

The calibration curve obtained from a blank sample and seven calibration standards was linear over a 20-fold concentration range with coefficients of determination r2 > 0.995 for all analyzed FAs.

Precision and accuracy were determined by analyzing the QC samples acquired for the intra- and interday assays. The intraday (n = 5) precision ranged from 1.1 to 12.0% (% CV), and accuracies ranged from 90.0 to 106.9% (% bias). Interday (n = 5) precision and accuracy were between 1.2 to 13.4% and 84.4 to 106.3% (Table 1). Bias values within an interval of ± 15% of the nominal value are accepted as a tolerance limit except for compounds with concentrations close to the LOQ, where 20% is acceptable (23). With respect to the nature and available sample volume of the matrix, these results demonstrate the applicability of the method.

FA profile of the initial oral biofilm (pellicle)

The lipid content of the pellicle has not been investigated thoroughly, even though lipids seem to be a significant constituent of the pellicle formed in vivo (16). Regarding the nature, function, and composition of lipids in the acquired pellicle, the current state of research provides only preliminary information. Studies on pellicle composition are hampered by the fact that only limited amounts of pellicle material can be harvested and recovered from human teeth in vivo for analytical investigation. The thickness of the pellicle layer is variable and depends on the oral exposure time as well as the localization in the oral cavity. It ranges between 10 to 20 nm after 3 min and up to 500 nm on buccal sites after 2 h (8, 20, 26). Despite these limitations, precise analysis of FAs in the pellicle is possible with the presented procedure. The chromatographic separation of the 13 FAs as their methyl ester derivatives was achieved with excellent peak shapes and high responses (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

GC/MS chromatogram of a pellicle sample (formation time 30 min) acquired in SIM mode. The sample was separated through a thermally stable Select FAME capillary column (50 m × 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 µm film thickness). The GC oven program started at 50°C (hold time 5 min) and was increased to 260°C (hold time 8 min) at a ramp rate of 6.5°C/min. Characteristic fragment ions (m/z 74, m/z 87, m/z 81, and m/z 79) were monitored throughout the run.

Although FA analysis of the lipid classes in pellicle samples was reported here, saliva samples can also be analyzed using this protocol as well as other biofilms relevant for the pathogenesis of certain diseases. Examples are contact lenses or bypass due to coronary heart disease.

Using the devised method, 11 FAs (12:0, 14:0, a15:0, 15:0, 16:0, 16:1n9c, 18:0, 18:1n9c, 18:2n6c, 20:0, 22:1n9c) were detected and quantified by GC-MS analysis of the pellicle samples. Among these, palmitic- (16:0) (32%), stearic- (18:0) (21%), oleic- (18:1n9c) (14%), erucic- (22:1n9c) (10%), and linoleic acids (18:2n6c) (5%) account for the majority of FAs in the pellicle. The FA profile of the pellicle seems to be characteristic for this biological structure (Fig. 2). The composition is very stable. However, the total amount of investigated FAs shows distinctive interindividual differences among the 10 study subjects (Fig. 3). Values vary from 680 to 1600 ng per cm2 pellicle formation surface. As compared with other pellicle parameters, the natural variability is rather low (11). Further research based on the presented method is necessary to evaluate the influence of saliva, oral localization, and pellicle formation time on the FA composition of the pellicle layer. Thereafter, epidemiological studies on the lipid composition of the pellicle in patients suffering from diseases such as xerostomia, periodontitis, dental erosions, or caries are possible. This offers further insight into the respective pathological mechanisms and new approaches in dental prophylaxis are conceivable. This is of considerable relevance as hydrophobic interactions are essential for the process of pellicle formation and bacterial adhesion as well as for the protective properties of the pellicle layer (7). Furthermore, the method allows for investigation of potential effects of rinses with mouthwashes or edible oils on the composition and functional properties of the pellicle layer.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

FA composition of pellicle sample (formation time 30 min). Values represent the means ± SD of 10 subjects expressed as percent of the investigated FAs. This profile seems to be characteristic for the biological structure of the pellicle.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Amount of total investigated FAs of the 30 min pellicle of the 10 study subjects (A–J). Values vary from 680 to 1600 ng per cm2 pellicle formation surface, illustrating interindividual differences (dashed line marks the mean amount of total fatty acids of the 10 subjects).

In conclusion, a comprehensive GC-MS method was developed as a practical and feasible assay, which allows the quantification of pellicle FAs and helps to understand the initial process of bioadhesion in the oral cavity, which is also governed by hydrophobic interactions. The presented study demonstrates, for the first time, a procedure based on a combination of innovative specimen generation and convenient sample preparation with sensitive GC-MS analysis for the determination of the FA profile of the initial oral biofilm.

Footnotes

Abbreviations:

BAME
bacterial acid methyl ester
CV
coefficient of variation
FAME
fatty acid methyl ester
IS
internal standard
LOD
limit of detection
LOQ
limit of quantification
QC
quality control
RSD
relative standard deviation
RT
retention time
SIM
selected ion monitoring
S/N ratio
signal-to-noise ratio
TEM
transmission electron microscopy

This study was supported by a scientific grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG; HA 5192/2-1; KU 1271/6-1).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Blinkhorn A. S., Davies R. M. 1996. Caries prevention. A continued need worldwide. Int. Dent. J. 46: 119–125 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Holtfreter B., Kocher T., Hoffmann T., Desvarieux M., Micheelis W. 2010. Prevalence of periodontal disease and treatment demands based on a German dental survey (DMS IV). J. Clin. Periodontol. 37: 211–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bagramian R. A., Garcia-Godoy F., Volpe A. R. 2009. The global increase in dental caries. A pending public health crisis. Am. J. Dent. 22: 3–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Petersen P. E. 2003. The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century–the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 31(Suppl. 1): 3–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marsh P. D. 2004. Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm. Caries Res. 38: 204–211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marsh P. D. 2005. Dental plaque: biological significance of a biofilm and community life-style. J. Clin. Periodontol. 32(Suppl 6): 7–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hannig C., Hannig M. 2009. The oral cavity–a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clin. Oral Investig. 13: 123–139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hannig M., Joiner A. 2006. The structure, function and properties of the acquired pellicle. Monogr. Oral Sci. 19: 29–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hay D. I. 1973. The interaction of human parotid salivary proteins with hydroxyapatite. Arch. Oral Biol. 18: 1517–1529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yao Y., Grogan J., Zehnder M., Lendenmann U., Nam B., Wu Z., Costello C.E., Oppenheim F. G. 2001. Compositional analysis of human acquired enamel pellicle by mass spectrometry. Arch. Oral Biol. 46: 293–303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hannig C., Hannig M., Attin T. 2005. Enzymes in the acquired enamel pellicle. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 113: 2–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Douglas C. W. 1994. Bacterial-protein interactions in the oral cavity. Adv. Dent. Res. 8: 254–262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lendenmann U., Grogan J., Oppenheim F. 2000. Saliva and dental pellicle-a review. Adv. Dent. Res. 14: 22–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hannig M., Khanafer A. K., Hoth-Hannig W., Al-Marrawi F., Acil Y. 2005. Transmission electron microscopy comparison of methods for collecting in situ formed enamel pellicle. Clin. Oral Investig. 9: 30–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carlén A., Rüdiger S. G., Loggner I., Olsson J. 2003. Bacteria-binding plasma proteins in pellicles formed on hydroxyapatite in vitro and on teeth in vivo. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 18: 203–207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Slomiany B., Murty V., Zdebska E., Slomiany A., Gwozdzinski K., Mandel I. 1986. Tooth surface-pellicle lipids and their role in the protection of dental enamel against lactic-acid diffusion in man. Arch. Oral Biol. 31: 187–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Slomiany B., Murty V., Mandel I., Sengupta S., Slomiany A. 1990. Effect of lipids on the lactic acid retardation capacity of tooth enamel and cementum pellicles formed in vitro from saliva of caries-resistant and caries-susceptible human adults. Arch. Oral Biol. 35: 175–180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thurnhofer S., Vetter W. 2005. A gas chromatography/electron ionization−mass spectrometry−selected ion monitoring method for determining the fatty acid pattern in food after formation of fatty acid methyl esters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53: 8896–8903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Deimling D., Hannig C., Hoth-Hannig W., Schmitz P., Schulte Mönting J., Hannig M. 2007. Non-destructive visualisation of protective proteins in the in situ pellicle. Clin. Oral Investig. 11: 211–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hannig M. 1999. Ultrastructural investigation of pellicle morphogenesis at two different intraoral sites during a 24-h period. Clin. Oral Investig. 3: 88–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Folch J., Lees M., Sloane Stanley G. H. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226: 497–509 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ichihara K., Fukubayashi Y. 2010. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for gas-liquid chromatography. J. Lipid Res. 51: 635–640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Peters F. T., Hartung M., Herbold M., Schmitt G., Daldrup T., Mußhoff F. 2009 Anforderungen an die Validierung von Analysenmethoden. Anhang B zur Richtlinie der GTFCh zur Qualitätssicherung bei forensisch-toxikologischen Untersuchungen: 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Christie W. W. 1989. Gas chromatography and lipids: A practical guide. 1st ed. Oily Press, Dundee, Scotland. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Christie W. W., Xianlin Han. 2010 Lipid analysis: Isolation, separation, identification and lipidomic analysis. 4th ed. The Oily Press, Bridgwater, England. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hannig M., Balz M. 2001. Protective properties of salivary pellicles from two different intraoral sites on enamel erosion. Caries Res. 35: 142–148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Lipid Research are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES